Baseball Toaster Dodger Thoughts
Help
Jon Weisman's outlet
for dealing psychologically
with the Los Angeles Dodgers
and baseball.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Dodger Thoughts
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2002
09  08  07 
About Jon
Thank You For Not ...

1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with

DIPSy Doodles
2004-01-27 05:27
by Jon Weisman

Have baseball's mathematicians built a better crystal ball to predict future pitcher performance?

In trying to answer this question from a 2004 Dodger perspective, I'm gonna try to keep this as simple as possible - for my sake as well as yours.

The theory: Major League pitchers essentially only control walks, strikeouts and home runs. On balls hit in the playing field, defense and chance play more of a role than the pitcher's skill.

As Jay Jaffe writes in his detailed examination on The Futility Infielder:

The Defense Independent Pitching Statistic (DIPS) system was invented by Voros McCracken. His studies of pitching statistics suggest that major league pitchers do not differ greatly on their ability to prevent hits on balls in play. The rate at which a pitcher allows hits on balls in play has more to do with defense and luck than to his own skill, and can vary greatly from year to year.

The upshot: By predicting what earned-run averages would be based only on innings pitched, strikeouts, walks allowed and home runs allowed (using a method of run estimation, a time-honored sabermetric concept, according to Jaffe), one can eliminate the chance elements from the equation and arrive at an defense-independent ERA, or DERA, that more accuarately reflects a pitcher's performance.

That number is more useful in predicting a pitcher's performance for the following season than his actual ERA is (obvious mitigating factors like injuries and age notwithstanding).

The mitigating factors: Subsequent studies on pitchers with long careers have shown that they do have some ability to prevent hits on balls in play, though this is still less than their impact on walks and strikeouts.

Let's see how DIPS works with Dodger pitchers from 2002 and 2003 as we look to 2004:

Comparison of Dodger ERAs with DERAs, 2002-2003

Player 2002 ERA 2002 DERA 2003 ERA2003 DERA
Alvarez5.285.422.373.01
Ashby3.914.585.184.04
Brown4.814.292.392.94
Daal3.904.546.344.51
Dreifort------4.033.34
Gagne1.971.871.201.01
Ishii4.275.013.864.66
Mota4.153.601.972.75
Nomo3.394.263.094.12
Perez3.003.564.524.09
Quantrill2.702.961.753.08
Shuey3.313.303.003.96
Weaver3.523.815.994.33


Pitchers whose 2002 DERA was higher than their 2002 actual ERA
(and therefore should have expected a poorer 2003):

Wilson Alvarez, Andy Ashby, Omar Daal, Kaz Ishii, Hideo Nomo, Odalis Perez, Paul Quantrill, Jeff Weaver.
Correct? Ashby, Daal, Perez, Weaver
Incorrect? Alvarez, Ishii, Nomo, Quantrill
Comment: Alvarez's injury recovery was probably a factor. Ishii and Nomo, both high-walk pitchers, continue to defy gravity in their ERAs. Note that while Daal had a 2.44 jump in actual ERA, his DERA remained almost the same.

Pitchers whose 2002 DERA was lower than their 2002 actual ERA
(and therefore should have expected an improved 2003):

Kevin Brown, Eric Gagne, Guillermo Mota, Paul Shuey (negligible)
Correct? Brown, Gagne, Mota, Shuey
Incorrect? None
Comment: One starting pitcher recovering from injury and three relievers.

As we consider the key guys on the 2004 Dodger staff, the system has had trouble predicting Nomo and Ishii - which may signal a flaw in the system, or may mean that those two are particularly due for a decline. Alvarez's ERA should normalize.

On the other hand, Weaver and Perez would be due for improvement, as would Dreifort if he is healthy. Even Gagne underperformed his 2003 DERA and could be considered a candidate to improve (!) this year. (Meanwhile, as many predict, Brown may be headed for a decline pitching in 2004 in front of the Yankee defense.)

I asked Jay Jaffe to comment further and he wrote, "Ishii and Nomo don't look so hot because of their high walk rates, but Nomo's K rate is good - he's not going to be your problem. Perez doesn't look so hot because his K rate is down, but he'll be OK. Call him and Nomo 'somewhat better than average but not spectacular.' Gagne ought to remain ungodly - it's not results on balls in play that makes him dominant, it's keeping balls from getting in play. Mota looks pretty good (though not as great as his ERA would lead you to believe), Dreifort too. I don't see any serious red-flags here, even with Nomo and Ishii's presence in the Higher dERA than ERA board."

Below is the full chart for the 2003 Dodgers, courtesy of Jaffe. Please go to The Futility Infielder to read much, much more about DIPS.

(BFP is actual batters faced by the pitcher. BIP is actual batting average against the pitcher on balls in play. ERAR is how many fewer earned runs the pitcher will have allowed over the number of innings pitched, compared to a replacement-level pitcher - that is to say, not an average player, but your average last man on the roster.)

Dodger DIPS Chart - 2003

LOSPlayerBFP BIPdIP dHdER dHRdBB dIB dHP dSOdERAERAR
LOSV Alvarez*31.400675 1 6 0 137.57-1.5
LOSW Alvarez* 377.286 92 81 31 425 3 5 823.0123.8
LOSA Ashby318.329 75 81 34 717 2 3 414.0410.9
LOST Brohawn*48.276 12 105 2 4 0 0 133.86 1.9
LOSK Brown856.289209184 681060 6 51842.9456.0
LOSS Colyer* 84.373 20 177 010 1 0 163.15 4.8
LOSD Dreifort 261.319 63 52 23 527 2 0 673.3414.0
LOSE Gagne306.243 82 429 220 2 31371.0139.4
LOSK Ishii* 656.288144129 7514 102 5 61404.6611.0
LOSE Jackson 91.259 21 199 211 1 1 194.04 3.0
LOSM Kida53.357 13 124 0 3 0 082.84 3.6
LOST Martin*210.236 49 43 21 522 2 2 523.84 8.3
LOSG Mota 410.256102 87 31 625 3 1 992.7529.5
LOSS Mullen* 17.200333 0 5 0 119.09-1.1
LOSR Myers 42.2909 105 1 4 0 154.95 0.4
LOSH Nomo897.253207195 952199 7 11774.1228.3
LOSO Perez* 772.294184188 842448 6 31414.0925.8
LOSP Quantrill291.260 71 69 24 215 2 3 443.0817.8
LOSP Shuey281.247 65 57 28 532 2 4 603.96 9.9

I continue to think that Steve Colyer is a good candidate for the Opening Day roster.

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.