Baseball Toaster Dodger Thoughts
Help
Jon Weisman's outlet
for dealing psychologically
with the Los Angeles Dodgers
and baseball.
Frozen Toast
Search
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Dodger Thoughts
Archives

2009
02  01 

2008
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2007
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2006
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2005
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2004
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2003
12  11  10  09  08  07 
06  05  04  03  02  01 

2002
09  08  07 
About Jon
Thank You For Not ...

1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with

Gagne Is Not the MVP
2003-09-05 14:43
by Jon Weisman

I've been so disenchanted with the Dodger columns in the Times this week that when I saw another I disagreed with - the worst of the bunch - I decided I had to just let it go.

Fortunately, Idiots Write About Sports countered Bill Plashcke's "Gagne for MVP" column" today most effectively in a posting entitled, What's French for 'Are You Freakin' Nuts?'

They, like me, were particularly stunned that anyone could consider Gagne, in all his greatness, more of a daily savior than Barry Bonds.

Gagne's own logic that relievers are better contenders for the MVP than the Cy Young is every bit as flawed.

You know I think the world of Gagne, but please, can we maintain just a little perspective?

(Thanks to Baseball Musings for the refer.)

Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.