Vote for Pedro!

Pretty funny -- now that Bob has given them a weather report, the Yankee fans over at Bronx Banter (not enjoying a Losers' Dividend by any stretch) are hoping for a Boston rainout tonight, leading to the Red Sox playing Toronto tomorrow afternoon and then the Yankees tomorrow night. Um, I guess.

I've always been confused about whether it is correct baseball etiquette to root for or against your favorite teams' divisional rival in the playoffs. Of course, I will never root for the Giants, but I want the Padres to represent the NL West well (even though we all know that the division is a complete farce(by farce, I mean a mixture of ground raw chicken and mushrooms with pistachios and truffles and onions and parsley and lots of butter and bound with eggs, typically used in stuffing, as for roasting). What should I do?

Confused in California

All I said was that there was a 30% of showers tonight in Boston.

They aren't going to rain out that game unless an ark floats down Landsdowne. They'll wait all night and into the wee hours of the morning.

No late night game will mean anything, although it seems that the DBacks have their eyes trained on second and have set up their rotation to go after the Giants. The Giants won't have Lowry (pitching tonight) or Schmidt (who should be done) for that series.

The Padres starters this weekend should be interesting. Obviously, no Peavy or Astacio. Not even Dodger-Killer Brian Lawrence. That leaves the likes of Chan Ho Park, Tim Stauffer, and maybe a few innings from Adam Eaton to keep him sharp.

4 - Bob, I know spelling is your specialty, but does my grammar update above meet your approval?

I don't know why I put a 4 with my commebt above.

2 - Root for whoever feels right to you. There are no rules. When in doubt, just root for great baseball, regardless of the outcome.

5 - Fighting mistakes with typos.

6
Jon - Any chance this board will ever enable posters to edit their posts after posting them?

Further to the grammar lesson, the publishing publication Publishers Weekly (http://www.publishersweekly.com/) - no apostrophe, and if any group of people would know if there needed to be one . . .

7 - Someday

Jon - what's your take on the Narron announcement? Obviously the Reds weren't even willing to wait another 2 weeks to find out about Tracy's status.

In RDGCs I either said "Dodger pitcher" or "Dodgers pitcher". I was told by my copy-desk working brothers that both are correct.

As for rooting for a team in the playoffs that isn't your own, I think it all depends upon the opponent.

For me, you have to establish a baseline. That is, a team that you dislike so much that you will not root for them even if they offered you $10 million to change allegiance and the team financed cures for AIDS, Alzheimers and cancer all at once. For me that is the team in the Bronx. Such teams exist in other sports. For example in college football, it is Notre Dame. In the NBA, it is the New York Knicks. In the NHL, I have chosen the New York Rangers. The NFL position is open for auditions. It used to be the Dallas Cowboys, but there's no point in that now. In college basketball, the position used to be held by Kentucky, but I think Duke occupies it.

Then there are regional dislikes. For me that would be the SF Giants, USC in football, Stanford in basketball (no one in particular in the other pro sports.)

These teams usually occupy spot #2 in my pantheon of dishonor. But when a team like Stanford played Kentucky in the Final Four, I was a big Stanford fan that day.

I rooted hard for both the Padres and DBacks to beat the Yankees in the World Series. I was ecstatic when the Yankees lost in 2001. I was beside myself with joy.

As for other teams, my allegiances shift in a series of alliances that are borne partly out of convenience and partly out of caprice.

Despite a caught stealing, the White Sox strike for two runs in the top of first on a Carl Everett triple.

10 - They must like Narron, and they might not want to bid for Tracy. According to the article, the Reds were 27-43 before Narron was hired, 45-42 after.

I assume that all the big games Saturday will be day games? Then I can actually watch some of them as the UCLA football game doesn't start until 7:15. And being a Pac-10 football game, it will last until 10:45 or 11.

I have to work Sunday, so it would be best if all the races are decided Saturday.

For me, the teams that come under TOTAL DISLIKE:
Notre Dame
Boston Celtics
SF Giants (I can never root for them)
NY Yankees
St. Louis Rams

REGIONAL DISLIKE:
UCLA
Anaheim Angels of Fullerton
Oakland Raiders
L.A. Clippers

Always root against:
Giants
Angels
Braves
Padres

The rest is dependent upon intangibles like player composition, management strategies, etc. and can vary year to year (the White Sox for example).

In this years playoffs, I'll be rooting for:

NL:
Cards vs. Padres
Astros vs. Braves

Cards vs. Astros.

AL (matchups are far from being set, so in order or preference):
Indians
Red Sox
Yankees
White Sox
Angels

The AL looks real ugly, especially if the Indians miss the playoffs.

BTW, 2001 was the year I was actually rooting for the Yankees due to the 9/11 factor.

16

As I tell people about how I feel about the Yankees, I cheer at the end of "Pride of the Yankees".

Jason Grilli is no friend of Cleveland. Now 3-0 in the second.

11 - Good philosophy. The only thing I would add is that you celebrate their defeats. I generally assign my malice towards teams that constantly defeat my favorite team. Here's my baseline.

Baseball: 1) Yankees 1a) Giants.

If these teams met in the Series, I would default to the Giants.

Basketball: Portland Trailblazers. I dislike them so vehemently that I have to use their full team name.

Football: Used to be the 49ers. I really hate the Ravens now.

College Basketball: North Carolina

Hockey: Detroit Red Wings

This raises another question. Which is more fun, rooting for a favorite team, or rooting against a rival?

NL:
Cards over Padres
Astros over Braves

Cards over Astros.

The Tigers have a better record than the Dodgers.

17 That's very good. I admire the style.

It's more fun to root for your team than against your rival. It's not fun to wait around to watch someone lose. I still enjoy Steve Finley's grand slam from last year or Gibson's homer in 1988 far more than Luis Gonzalez's bloop single off of Mariano Rivera.

I consider myself, (self, self, self)
the pettiest man (man, man, man, man)
on the face (face, face, ace, ace) of the earth (earth, earth, rth).

I find it hard to get fired up over non-baseball rivals nowadays.

I used to despise Notre Dame, Duke, the Trailblazers, the Cowboys, the Spurs but its hard to sustain that level of negativity.

I'm a big UCLA fan, but I find it hard to root against USC (I've got soft spot for lefty QB's - really enjoyed the Cade McNown reference up there). I'm sure I'll get tired of it next year, after 3 straight Nat'l Champs, and Leinart is lining up under center for the AZ Cardinals.

I was brought up to despise UCLA and Notre Dame. I merely dislike UCLA nowadays. I'm going to enjoy the thrashing USC gives the Irish.

My dislike of Notre Dame stems from going to Catholic elementary school and being told that I had to root for Notre Dame out of some religious allegiance.

I disliked Kentucky because my mother taught me that Adolph Rupp was a bad man.

Although I won't root for the Yankees, I think the title of "Least Likeable World Series Champion" in my lifetime would have to go to the 1986 Mets. Then it would be the 1980 Phillies.

Last home game of the year tonight; this is the first season I've not made it even once to Dodger stadium in a long time. I guess some would say I picked a good one to miss, but a bummer nonetheless.

I always root against USC, the Giants, and the Marlins. I went to college in Philadelphia, and definitely developed a distaste for the Phillies, but it mostly had to do with their absurd fans. My family went to the second game played at the new park in Philly last year and the fans loudly booed Billy Wagner because was only throwing 98 and couldn't get one over 100 on the stadium gun. So there he is blowing people away, winning a day game on a beautiful afternoon in a brand spanking new stadium, and he's getting booed. I bet he'll be happy to get to Boston next year.

jon, i think you shoulda written it: "STOP: grammar time." :)

The 1989 version of the Athletics were pretty dislikeable. For that matter, the 72-74 version was too.

Going for a triple . . . Detroit got 2 on the bottom of the second but could not score. They're up again now in the third, still 3-0.

31 continued. Re, 1989 and that was against the Giants! I barely watched that series except for the earthquake coverage.

thrown out at third.

Magglio up in Det with 2 on in the third.

I keep forgetting that Magglio Ordonez isn't on Chicago.

He's on Ozzie Guillen's "Hate List", which is about as long as Homer Simpson's "Get Even With List".

Ground ball to second. Getting very quiet sitting around the locker room in Cleveland.

Cleveland still has a pretty good chance of making the playoffs. They still should be favored tonight against Tampa Bay (Sabathia vs. Fossum) and if they are playing Chicago over the weekend, the White Sox will likely be resting a few of their players.

That assumes that Ozzie Guillen is being rational.

Sam, me too. First season in years. 10 years at least. For me, it has to do with changing jobs. I used to work in Irvine (which making the drive sucks from there) but now I am in Carlsbad.

Also, I went to the LIMA game last year vs the Cards. So thats my last memory and thats a good thing.

ooh, i love these discussions:

teams i hate:

baseball: yankees, giants, angels
basketball: kings, jazz (and it's not just a divisional thing; i like the suns)
college: stanford, texas. i really don't mind USC or UCLA, and generally i root for the pac-10 schools unless they are playing cal.
pro football: new england, san francisco

i think that about covers it. anyway, i'll be rooting for the padres and indians in the playoffs. or the braves i guess, if san diego loses quickly.

I believe the White Sox have already clinched at least a post-season, tie-breaker game, and their magic number is actually one. The worst record they can finish with is 95-67, and the Yankees and Red Sox can't BOTH finish with better records since they play each other three times (one of them will end up with at least 67 losses). If the White Sox win today, the most losses they can end up with is 66, and either the Yankees or Red Sox have to lose more.

I've still got my allegiances in every sport, if not so much hate for the rivals.

Go Niners, Lakers, UCLA, LAKings in the major sports.

And in ultimate frisbee, of course, go Gauchos of UCSB!

Somebody mentioned defaulting to the Giants should they ever play the Yankees in the WS. I think the better approach would be to hope that that match-up never, ever, ever happens. McCovey lining out to Kubek should, by rights, be the end of it.

40
You're a good man, Vishal

Teams I hate:

Baseball: Yankees, Giants, Braves
Pro Football: New England, San Francisco

42
It is unnatural to like the Dodgers, Lakers, AND 49ers. That's just not right.

43 - For me, my cursed matchup is Giants/Angels.

I have so little respect for the Angels and their fans (for the most part - anyone in here is ok :-) ), and some very good friends that are Giant fans, that I might not be horribly crushed if the Giants were to win.

er...probably not. I would choose not to root. Or acknowledge it's happening.

45 - I am who I am, and always have been.

Started rooting for the Niners very early on, and have never looked back.

45 I've struggled with the ethical question of pro football allegiances for LA fans. To me, continuing to root for the Rams or Raiders is the worst choice. Its like stalking your ex-wife. I suspect the local 9ers contingent exists because they were still a top team when the locals left. Here are two choices that I would propose as acceptable:

1. pick some random team of middling success (Saints seems like a good one)
2. stop following pro football.

48 - Have always disliked the Raiders.

The Rams were fun for about 3 1/2 weeks in 1989 with Jim Everett, Flipper Anderson, Henry Ellard, and Cleveland Gary but always went with Montana and the Niners.

I have a friend who is a big fan of both USC and Notre Dame football. He lives in Canada.

I have tried to point out to him that he is living a logical fallacy, but he says he isn't.

Speaking of logical fallacies, and I'm sure it was dissected here, but I missed most of yesterday, but in Plaschke's column about the Angels clinching, he said wasn't about to compare the Angels to the Dodgers because there was no comparison.

Then he went and listed a bunch of comparisons.

46 Blue, if you don't mind, I wonder how old you are? I worry that the Dodgers have been off the national stage for so long, that we don't even have a real hatred for the Yankees anymore. If you can remember 77 and 78, and I guess, at 34, I'm about minimum age for that, the Yankee thing runs way deeper than any Angel antipathy ever will.

I can't remember much about 77 and 78, but it's not because I'm too young.

50 Bob, I've had friends who like both the NYY and the Red Sox. They all have one thing in common - they're women.

pedro astacio is the "author" of the only no-hitter i ever threw in "tony larussa baseball 96" or the "mvp" line that succeeded it. that's 9 years of playing off and on. i'm really not a loser.

anyway, i do not like the giants, braves, yankees (love gehrig, though) or the white sox. i cheer for the dodgers, blue jays and red sox. my son has become quite an angels fan, so i feign delight in their victories for his innocent soul (he's only 5).

vikings, redskins, winnipeg blue bombers, la kings round out the other majors. no basketball for me - the nba has moved away from my demographic. far far away.

50 - In case you haven't noticed, Bill Plaschke runs on pure saccharin.

The 2002 World Series was a no brainer for me. It was the Angels all the way. There was no way I was going to enjoy a World Series with Russ Ortiz winning the clincher on a home run by Shawon Dunston. Such events would have shaken my faith in humanity. I might have gone and joined a monastery if it hadn't been for Messrs. Spezio, Erstad, and Glaus.

I really don't dislike the Angels and I think the older people here don't have any particular antipathy toward them.

51 - no doubt. i almost cried when the 78 team lost 4 in a row after welch struck out reggie. i was only 7. 81 didn't quite make up for the pain i felt. i think the 88 season (and being at game 1) finally put me into the happy zone.

Nothing really matters to me except Stanford and the Dodgers win every game they play. After that, I just root mainly for good games.

I used to root hard for UCLA as my No. 2 because my mom went there, but now I'm a bandwagon fan. I do always root for every Pac-10 team, including USC and Cal, in non-conference games.

Everyone's coming down on Stanford - but how must Navy feel? They couldn't beat the team that couldn't beat Davis.

I saw the Blue Bombers play when I was in Toronto.

They lost. Even more disappointing, I went to a CFL game and there were no rouges! I wanted my $10 back!

(Or as the guy who walked around Rogers Centre asking trivia questions called them, "rogues".)

I don't like the Angels, but will root for them in the playoffs. I mostly ignored them in the 60's - 90's. I kind of secretly enjoyed Autry never winning because I hated his old cowboy movies.

50, 55 As much ink as Plaschke spills to promote the Angels, I wonder if that column might have pissed off some Angel fans. They win the division, and the story is about the Dodgers.

It's not patriotic to root against Navy.

Unless you went to West Point or Colorado Springs.

56
I agree. It never occurred to me until I started visiting message boards a year or so ago that Dodger fans thought of the Angels as anything other than "just another team."

For me, it has always been like the Dodgers, hate the Giants and Yankees, and ignore everyone else.

California Angels -- good
Anaheim Angels -- OK
Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim -- give me a break

[44]- hah, thanks man.

[48]- i root for the raiders, but i feel justified because (1) they left LA when i was a kid and (2) i've lived in the east bay.

i think i like the two most antithetical teams in the NFL, the bad boy raiders, and the aw-shucks packers.

[58]- there's a difference between couldn't and didn't, if that makes you feel any better :)

If it's the White Sox, Yankees, Red Sox, and Angels in the AL Playoffs, it's gotta be the Angels.

61

Yeah, I think you've hit it the nail on the head there. The Angels won the AL West. They've won 2 years in a row. They've made the playoffs 3 of the last 4 seasons. They don't need to be compared to other teams in the area. Even the laziest of baseball fans in the area could tell you which franchise has fared better in recent years.

Maybe I should send Bill Plaschke my list of 10 things the L.A. Times Sports Section needs to do to improve so I can enjoy my reading experience. Sort of like how he presented his list of non-negotiable demands to the Dodgers before the season on changes he wanted at Dodger Stadium.

Selfishly, I would like to see a Cardinals-Angels World Series because I could likely visit with my brother who would be out with his paper covering it.

He told me he's likely writing sidebar #4 for the post-season. Last year, he was writing sidebar #7.

After that $1 billion tax bill the Times just got hit with, I don't think any changes on the sports page are going to be for the better.

i used to be angels-agnostic for most of my life. i went to some angels games because i grew up in orange county and it was closer, but they games were never much fun. anaheim stadium was a bland, corporate-feeling place with no life, there weren't many fans who were actually interested, and the team sucked. i thought dodger stadium always had a great atmosphere with a lot of diverse, colorful fans (in every sense of the word, not just one) from different walks of life who were all rooting together for the same thing. it was a great sense of togetherness that dodger stadium evoked, rare in such a far-flung, disparate place as southern california.

i did root for the angels in '02 against the giants, but i've since grown to hate them too. the team and the fans (many, not all of course) bother me. i'd still root for them against the giants, but that's not saying much.

[67]

1. get rid of bill plaschke. :)

he probably won't take kindly to your other suggestions if you start it off with that one, though.

That 1 billion dollar hit was courtesy of Tom Unterman. The same guy who brokered the Trbiune deal and wound up with a seat on the board. A prince of a guy.

CWS 4 DET 1 Top 8

67 - as somebody who managed to go through life mostly unaware of Bill Plaschke, when did he appoint himself Keeper of the Dodger Flame? I remember a piece a few years back when he was gnashing and wailing about the teams changing the ushers' uniforms slightly. Did Kevin Malone steal his girlfriend or something?

51 - I'm just short of 30 (next month. I was born about 6 hours after Fisk waved it fair).

So yes, I'm too young to really appreciate the Yanks-Dodgers rivalry. I mostly think of the Yankees now as the Evil Empire.

As far as the Angels go, I did root for them in the '02 Series, but I've found them (and their fans, and their owner, and their announcers) to be insufferable since then.

Matthew Bender is the Jason Phillips of this story. Immediate illusory dividends; Huge long term costs compounded over time

i thought dodger stadium always had a great atmosphere with a lot of diverse, colorful fans (in every sense of the word, not just one) from different walks of life who were all rooting together for the same thing. it was a great sense of togetherness that dodger stadium evoked, rare in such a far-flung, disparate place as southern california.

Nice.

64 - That's a good breakdown.

It can also go by team colors -

blue, red, and gold (complete with halo) - classic

periwinkle - neutral, charming enough

red - where it all went horribly wrong

No outs bottom of the 8th in Chicago, and Polanco gets a leadoff single. That might be all for Freddy Garcia.

The Yankees have reacquired Mike Stanton from Washington for their weekend series against Boston.

Sheesh.

I suspect the local 9ers contingent exists because they were still a top team when the locals left.

Yep.

My NFL allegiences have shifted around much more than baseball. I used to like the Giants, but then the Jets got Namath and I switched to them. Then I moved to California, and liked the Rams and the Jets. But then the Rams moved to OC, Georgia took over under suspicious circumstances, but the Raiders came to LA, so I liked them, especially when they won a Super Bowl. But then they moved back to Oakland, which encapsulated a string of disturbing actions by the litigious, vendetta-loving Al Davis (how can anyone forgive him for benching Marcus Allen?), so I decided I really hate them. Somewhere in the middle of all that Joe Montana, Dwight Clark, Roger Craig and Ronnie Lott captured my attention, and even though the Niners are bad and their ownership is dumb, I'm still a fan.

Baseball for me is simple. I hate the Yankees. Therefore, I rooted for the Mets, then moved to LA and rooted for the Dodgers. I didn't become an Angels fan until the arrival of the Salmon/Percival/Edmonds/Erstad team, a run they're still on although the original cast has mostly been replaced. Joy it was when the Angels came back in the division series in '02 to beat the Yanks, and then went on to beat the other Hated Ones, the Giants. So, I'll be rooting for the Angels throughout the playoffs, hoping they get a chance to knock off the Yankees and then (God won't be this nice) sweep the Most Hated Ones, the Padres in the World Series, in a fashion so humiliating the entire team is induced to jump off a cliff in Torrey Pines.

80 Think he went to the Sox: "The Washington Nationals today acquired right-handed pitchers Rhys Taylor and Yader Peralta from the Boston Red Sox in exchange for left-handed pitcher Mike Stanton. Nationals Vice President and General Manager Jim Bowden made the announcement."

article says he would not be available should Boston go to the playoffs.

http://tinyurl.com/awnrz (or go to mlb.com's nationals page)

Magglio doubles in a run; now 4-2 with one out bottom 8th.

I rooted for that '02 Angels team for lack of a better alternative. I do not think I can root for them again.

The Yankees in general are appalling, but I found it easy to appreciate their teams of the mid to late 90s.

Other teams I despise: Cubs, Giants, Diamondbacks, Mets, and -- just because of Joe Morgan -- the Reds. Come to think of it, I'm not crazy about the Red Sox, either.

I have been fortunate enough (OK, I'm old enough) to have seen the Dodgers play at the Coliseum and the LA Angels play at Chavez Ravine - they just couldn't call it Dodger Stadium, which, of course, it is. I still feel about the Yankees they way I did when Sandy Koufax lept off the mound after completing a four game sweep. I still feel the same about the Giants as I did when the only Dodger games televised during the season were those from Candlestick Park, in B&W, on channel 11, and when they won the 1962 playoffs against the Dodgers. May both teams burn in hell. Were they to ever play again in a World Series, I'd just turn everything off, declare the season a mistrial and go golfing. Which is what I do if the Braves play the Yankees. I hate the Braves only slightly less than I hate the Giants - but I'm not sure it's a measurable difference. As for the Angels, well, no matter what they do, they'll always be just the Angels.

I hope the Dodgers can get back some of their former shine. Everytime I see Mike Edwards wearing number 25, I wish Frank Howard would show up, rip the number of Edwards' back, and see how far he (Frank) coud shotput him (Edwards).

Well, I hope someone warned the Red Sox to be very careful during Stanton's first appearance. In his first game for the Nationals this season, he came in with the bases loaded and gave up a walk off balk before throwing a single pitch.

For some reason Frank Howard picked Monrovia to live in (at least for awhile) when he was on the Dodgers. He was around the corner from my house. He was a very big man. Especially through an 8-year-old's eyes.

85 - I'm old enough to remember seeing cheerleaders at the Big A. ;) Man, that was weird.

87 - Frank Howard used to be the first-case coach for the M's when they played in the Kingdome, and at 60-odd years of age looked bigger and stronger than anyone else in uniform. My stepdad remembers seeing him hit a ball out of the Coliseum.

tying run at the plate in the bottom of the ninth in detroit -- no outs.

2 outs now in Detroit, 2 on, Polanco up.

Polanco out.

...and it's over. white sox magic # is 1.

Remember the "Embraceable Ewes" Ram cheerleaders at the stadium? They were paraded into the newsroom at the Glendale paper I was working at the first year of their existance. That was a red-letter day.

You guys are way too mature and well reasoned. The teams I hate are determined by the people I know. For example, there was a guy in law school I coundn't stand who was a big Michigan fan. So naturally I vocally took up rooting against Michigan. Loved to piss him off. To this day I hate Michigan for that reason.

Otherwise its Notre Dame and any team from Texas (except, perhaps Rice). Second tier dislikes include Yankees and Raiders.

I don't really get this Stanton deal. The Nationals get 2 young pitchers and all they give up is 3 days of Mike Stanton? Do they lose a draft pick they would have gotten if he'd signed somewhere else next year?

And why don't deals like this happen more -- or do they? Sure, it's a drag getting a piece and then not being able to bring it into the postseason, but there are always teams heading into a close series who could use an extra piece and other teams who are eliminated and are going to lose players anyway. Could the Red Sox have gone after AJ Burnett or Jeff Weaver to start one game, if they'd been willing to give up enough minor league talent to compensate the other team for losing the draft pick, right to resign through arbitration? Am I just revealing the limts of my understanding of the issues?

Ahh, so the Red Sox have Stanton? Go figure? Is this part of some bizarre prisoner exchange they have with their discarded players? Will there be an Embree-Stanton duel for the AL East?

The teams I hate are determined by the people I know.

This is why I hate the Sacramento Kings.

In Steve Henson's story in today's time, he mentioned that the 1892 Dodgers hold the franchise record for most steals in a season with 409.

However, in those days you got credit for a stolen base on any play where a runner took an extra base. So if you went from 1st to third on a single, you got credit for a stolen base.

Dislikes for me generally have little to do with the teams and everything to do with the fans:

COLLEGE
* Post-Nike Oregon: most obnoxious fans in Pac-10, retina-charringly ugly uniforms, and those stupid billboards a few years ago. Inferiority complex, anyone? I grew up in Washington, and never disliked UofO in the slightest until Nike's weird Type-A snobbery took over.
* Whichever punk Cal/Stanford/UO/etc. team thinks this is their year to finally win the Rose Bowl.
* Honorable mention: USC - Mostly because of "my maid went to UCLA," and "Daaaah! Dah-duh dah-dah duh dah-duh!" And one of their alumni put Orange County into bankruptcy.
* Like all good Americans, I despise the weepy sanctimony of Coach K and the Duke basketball program.

BASEBALL:
* Yankees: overrated stadium, overrated fans, overrated uniforms, overrated team
* Red Sox: presumably you're as obsessed with the Sox as they are, right?
* Giants: see "Sox, Red." SF really is the Boston of the East.

BASKETBALL:
* No comment, but let's just say removable car flags have a lot to do with it.

FOOTBALL:
* Rams: The Ego that Inhabits Mike Martz has singlehandedly turned my favorite team into my least favorite in roughly 3 years.
* Broncos: Romanowski + Barking "Genius" Mike Shanahan

HOCKEY:
* Los Angeles Mighty Ducks of Anaheim: crap team that should never have existed created via crap idea playing under crap name in crap uniforms at a crap stadium that, while admittedly nice, looks more like a convention center than a hockey forum. These guys are the Flying Dutchman of professional sports. Move them to Winnipeg /Hamilton/Portland/Quebec/Seattle/Anywhere and put them out of their misery already.

Sure, it's a drag getting a piece and then not being able to bring it into the postseason...

But won't the Sox be able to use Stanton if they can say he's replacing a disabled player? I am pretty sure that's happened in the past, where a post-season roster has gotten a player who was a September call-up or post Aug. 30th trade because of an injury.

Wow, you guys really limit your hatred. I, for instance, hate the entire ACC, starting with Duke, Florida State, and Boston College, primarily because of people I know and living in ACC territory and being subjected to their broadcasts. In fact, most of my hatred is for teams in the area I live in, I doubt I would hate the Cubs so much if I didn't live in Chicago and hear about how great it is to go to Wrigley and get tanked. In 1985 I lived in Kansas City and rooted for the Cardinals in the series even after what they did to the Dodgers that year.

72 Anybody have more info on the Times fine? First I've heard of it, and I'm interested as I used to do media relations for RCG.

SF really is the Boston of the East.

Very true (though I think you meant 'of the West.' And San Diego is the west's Baltimore.

The 1941 Dodgers won the pennant despite stealing just 36 bases all season, which I believe is the franchise low for a full season. They won 100 games. Those Dodgers led the NL in walks and home runs.

They were second in the NL in runs allowed also and third lowest in walks given out.

Of the Dodgers eight regular starters that year, all but one walked more than he struck out. The exception was Dolph Camilli who had 104 walks and 115 strikeouts (and 34 home runs).

Pee Wee Reese led the team in steals with 10.

That team seemed very Moneyball-ish.

103 Here's a short & sweet summary, with a link to the original item:

http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2005/09/tribune_shrugs_it_off_1.html

To pay it, they're going to sell bonds. Call your broker.

Stanton wouldn't be eligible even if there were an injury because you have to be in the organization as of August 31.

100
Adam M -

Having grown up in Eugene and gotten undergrad and grad degrees from UofO, I have to agree with you on the Nike-dom of the football program. It has changed for the worst.

I also agree with you on the Rams (my favorite team) and Martz (the worst coach in the history of organized sports). He has single-handedly destroyed what should have been a dynasty.

Does no one in St. Louis blame Georgia for anything bad with the Rams? What's wrong with them?

Thanks, Ratt

109
Yes, Georgia is horrible, but the Rams nevertheless won a Super Bowl under her ownership and then subsequently self-imploded. I attribute the implosion to Martz.

Nice piece over at Baseball Analysts by Jeff Shaw of USS Mariner.

112
I'd read it, but I'm afraid I would have to give up Paul Konerko to read it.

113 LOL.

108 - How egomaniacal a coach do you have to be to not give the ball to Marshall freaking Faulk? "Thank you, Obi Wan, but instead of the lightsaber, I'l be using this device I've improvised from a flashlight, a cell phone and two bottles of Febreze."

Plus, if Martz had just ran Faulk more in the 2001 Super Bowl, we would probably have been spared the canonization of Bill Belichick and Tom "Trent Dilfer 2.0" Brady. The Pats probably would have dumped Brady & Belichick, thrown a mint at Parcells, and gone back to Bledsoe.

As the owner of an old and often incontinent cat, I can tell you that Febreeze has magical powers.

Who are these "Rams" everyone is referring to?

The Royals finally signed Gordon. $4 mil minor league deal

115
Amen. A high school coach (and a bad one at that) could have guided the Rams to a victory over the Pats. Martz wasn't content to win; he wanted to win big. The only way they lose that game is to do exactly what Martz did (and continues to do).

118

Tom Gordon? He decided to leave the Yankees at this crucial time to return to the organization that gave him his start!
God bless that man!

:-)

115 - Seriously, how have the Patriots not made anybody's list yet??

As the only Philly fan here, it seems, I'll spare everybody a mile-long list and just point out one thing: nobody else here hates their hometown team(s) as much as we do.

Nobody.

The Angels JVs lead the Atheltics JVs, 5-0.

Anyone want a left fielder (for a year): "One possibility will be for Melvin to dangle slugger Carlos Lee, who has one year at $8.5 million left on his contract, as trade bait over the winter rather than give him a huge extension."
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2175987

121 - Is it true a lot of Philly fans dislike Bobby Abreu? Why on Earth would this be? I cannot fathom this. The guy has done nothing but rake for years.

123 - Sign me up, as long as he slugs with character.

On that note, some people on ussmariner are expressing a desire to pickup Milton Bradley. Their current CF is a slick-fielding youngster who from his stats appears to swing an extension cord instead of a bat. Also, their GM is a respected "baseball guy" and the local media is immune to "character," so Milton's baggage seems to weigh a lot less.

Remembering Sandy:

Sandy Koufax made his second major league apperance on June 29, 1955 against the New York Giants in a game at Ebbets Field. Pitchong in relief, Sandy entered the game in the 9th inning with the Dodgers trailing 6-0.

Sandy loaded the bases with no outs and then proceeded to pitch out of trouble. Sandy retired Don Mueller on a short fly ball to left, Hank Thompson on a pop up to Jackie Robinson and Gail Harris on a grounder to Pee Wee Reese.

The Dodgers scored a run in the 9th to avert the shutout. Sandy gave up 2 hits and 1 walk in his one inning of work, stranding all three runners he allowed to reach base.

Thanks to Koufax, written by Sandy and Ed Linn and retrosheet.

Stan from Tacoma

I just noticed that in last night's Red Sox/Toronto game, with the Sox down by five runs and a man on first in the 7th, MVP candidate David Ortiz, he of the 46 home runs and 144 RBIs--bunted. And he bunted into a force play.

And Francona works for a sabre-guy.

124 - I think Philly (and das411 can chime in) has to make some serious decisions this offseason. They have a lot of money tied up between Rollins, Abreu, Burrell, Lieberthal, Lieber, and of course Thome.

I think the best player to trade would be Abreu. He makes a ton of money, isn't the most popular guy in Philly, and has the highest relative trade value.

Not to mention they're going to have to pay someone a pretty penny to take Thome off their hands to clear a path for Ryan Howard.

Martz's refusal to adjust his offensive gameplan in the Superbowl is the reason the Rams lost to the Partiots.

I think he has a great mind for offense, but he seems to need a head coach to reel him in. I am so tired of watching his stupid replay challenges and wasted timeouts. He has also put together the most horribly retarded special teams unit in the history of modern football.

The Rams have been like the Braves lately, consistent playoff appearances and division crowns (at least by today's NFL standards), a couple of Superbowls, but only one title to show for it.

Still, just because I may not like or agree with Martz, I could never root against the team.

111. How did the Rams 'self-implode"??? I'm a Rams fan we've been to the playoffs like 5 of 6 seasons I believe since Martz took over.

In the salary cap era, its tough to maintain that level of competitiveness, and the Rams have. Look whats happend to the NY GIants, Ravens, Titans, Panthers, Bucs....

Yeah we shoudl have won 2 Super Bowls instead of just 1, but I dont think we were ever a real 'dynasty'...

In 2000, Warner got hurt and missed 4-5 games. We lost at the Saints when Kurt turned the ball over 4-5 times, and Az Hakim dropped a punt. How can you blame Martz for that?

In 2002, Warner was just awful. Faulk started showing his age. Team finished 7-9.

In 2003, Martz got a pretty average Rams team a 12-4 record. It was also Bulger's 1st year as the bonafide starter. That Carolina Panther game was just a fluky win for the Panthers. Double OT.. Jeff Wilkins, who had been money all season, missed a potential GW field goal in OT. Now Martz coudl have gone for the win in regulation but played it safe. Still the Panther scored 1 of their TD's on a fumble recovery for a TD, and had some other fluke plays. I dont think coaching cost the Rams this game..

In 2004, againt Bulger went down. The offensive line sucked. It was Steven Jax rookie year. Still managed to win a road playoff game.

I like Martz. I think he's a big positive for the Rams. I dont think we were ever a 'dynasty". The league started to catch up to the Rams scheme. Play deep cover 2, dont let the Rams get vertical on you. It was the TB Bucs game plan and the whole league started adopting it. That, in addition to the aging of once great starters like Warner, Faulk, Timmerman, Nutten on the line, and it was just an overall erosion of talent.

Thats what happens when you draft in the bottom of the rounds each year.

Its why the NFL is the best sport there is. Every season is different. Every team has a chance.

stupid replay challenges

Like when he challenged (and lost) the opening kickoff 2 weeks ago?

129
Couldn't agree more. I can't believe Martz hasn't been canned yet. Very frustrating.

130 - He's like Tracy. The team wins in spite of him, yet he gets the credit.

I do give them credit for a nice 5 year run which, in the NFL, is impressive.

117 -- What is this "football?"

134 - Spoken like a true LA resident. You sure you're not from around here?

130 I don't blame Martz for everything, and I agree with you about the erosion of talent.

135 -- But I am from around here. I was, nominally, raised a Rams fan. I remember Flipper Anderson.

133. How can the team win inspite of him when he calls the plays?

In football, you actually need to run plays and exploit matchups. Martz has done that.

Like I said, to go from the Warner, Faulk, Bruce team to the Bulger, Jackson, Holt, Curtis, McDonald team without a drop off is a good feat.

We've also lost some good players like London Fletcher, Dre Bly, Wistrom due to the salary cap.

Martz isnt a perfect coach, but he's one of the best at developing QB's. And to me, thats probably the most important position on the football field. I dont think the Rams win 'inspite of him', bc that would make one assume that the Rams have just an abundance of talent that other teams dont. I disagree. Our offense is still good, but the special teams and defense has been terrible. No matter whom was coaching.

To go from Warner to Bulger to probably Harvard in the next few years should keep the Rams train rolling.

People forget that the Rams BARELY beat the Bucs, AND TITANS during the super bowl run. If we lose just one of those close ones, like we did during the 2nd super bowl loss, no one is even complaing about losing out on a potential 'dynasty'.

Playoff football always comes down to a few plays here and there. During the 1999, those plays went the Rams way. In 00, 01, and 03 they went against us. Thats football. When everyone has the same level of money to spend on talent, there isnt much of a difference talent wise in the league.

The Rams are dead to me.

Not to beat a dead horse, or give anybody a hard time, but I can't believe people here are Ram fans. I've put with up with a lot of crap from the Dodgers over the years, but if they ever left town, that's it. We'd be done. I might even go all Roger Kahn on you and carry a grudge for fifty year, barely countenance the the mentioning of their name.

On the other hand, it is only football.

There's really only one football question of any consequence in my mind: Where does He Hate Me play now?

141 - Carolina Panthers. And they love he, apparently.

Icaros and DP4 you guys should check out www.realramsfans.com I think its the best Rams messageboard out there, especially since the one on the Post-Dispatch isnt moderated well, and the official one at the Rams website shut down.

If Barron plays well this week, I think the Rams might go on a little win streak. I also liked how Archuleta has played this year. Maybe its due to his playmate GF Jennifer Walcott????

141 Thx -- I'm very happy for them.

Laroche is one of the many AFL prospects writing player journals. His first includes this quote, sure to make chemist Dodger fans pee thier pants

"Not only were there a lot of prospects, but we got along really well and we had great team chemistry. We hung out together on the field and off the field. We're all great friends. In the clubhouse, we were always joking around together. It's by far the best team I've ever had the chance to play for. It was incredible going out every day with that group of guys."

http://tinyurl.com/bmne8 It's at MiLB.com for the tinyurl impaired

I was never that mad about the Rams leaving because I lived in the Bay Area so long, so I was used to not hearing anything about them anyway. When I moved back to LA, they left the next year.

I was always disappointed that nobody seemed to care or try to do anything to keep the Rams. I remember when the Giants were threatening to move to Florida under similar circumstances, and SF went out of it's way to keep that from happening.

As long as they're called the Rams, they'll be my team, even if they move to Istanbul.

145 Another interesting part:

"A lot of people talk about him moving to third someday. Me and Guzy are always kidding around about that stuff. I'm always telling him he's going to take my position. It's really out of our control. We just go out and play where they tell us to play. Whenever they want to move us up, they'll do it. There's nothing we can do about it."

146 Istanbul - great football town. What are they offering in a stadium deal?

If he hits the ball, he can say the moon is made of green cheese.

148
I think the NFL wants the team to be called the Constantinople Rams, but apparently that's nobody's business but the Turks.

And with due respect, I like Joel the Destroyer better than "Guzy." That's just me.

Another problem with placing an NFL team in Istanbul is that in NFL parlance, a player getting cut during training camp is visited by the mythical "Turk".

So what would a Turkish team use? Would it be "The American"?

The Armenian?

150 Another rimshot for Bob. Thanks for putting that song in my head.

124 , 128 - Oh yes. Yes yes yes.

The first three paragraphs here are the best explanation I've seen of the general Philly attitude towards Abreu:

http://tinyurl.com/do63x

My theory is as follows: The reason the rest of the league is so big on him, and Web-inclined fans like you guys, is because you don't watch him play, in the field, every day. There is a big difference between reading about his 2-for-4s and 1-for-3s with a walk and a steal every day, and seeing the two hits are garbage time singles (or come with nobody on base, more on this later) and the steal was when Thome or Howard were at bat and led to an intentional walk.

In many ways, he is the ideal SABR player. Always puts up .300-30-100, gives you 140+ games every year, 25-35 steals, and his defensive stats are good. What's the problem?

The problem is, and my link explains this better than I can, the way his game is totally at odds with the ideal Philly player. Our 1993 team was a group of the nastiest, craziest slimeballs ever, and we loved them. Have you ever even seen Abreu get his uniform dirty?

Adam says "The guy has done nothing but rake for years." This is true in more ways than one. Abreu joined the team in the infamous trade for Kevin Stocker, and as a result never really grew on the fans as a homegrown player the way Burrell, Utley, Howard and Rollins have. He also wasn't a big acquisition when we brought him in, a la Thome, Wagner, or even Millwood/Milton/Lieber. Abreu has always just sort of been there, solidly good but never great the way Thome was in 2003 or, you could argue, Utley this year.

I'll answer Blue22's post in a second, just wanna break this up a little.

i stopped caring about the rams when ferragamo left and dieter brock came down from the hinterlands.

124 - i think the phillie phans are down on abreu because all he does is rake. they feel he doesn't sacrifice the body in the field, or so i've been told. aren't philadelphia fans the ones that booed santa claus?

i am an la kings fan, but i lived in oc when the ducks came around, and bought a share of season tix. went to the opener and sat through the "ice man" production. worse thant the rob lowe/snow white oscar production. even the cheerleaders on skates were better. this just cemented my hatred of the ducks.

155 That all sounds a lot like how I used to feel about Sheffield. I said stuff like "all his homers come in the first inning," "when you need a hit, he pops up," and, my favorite, "he's a bad fielder."

In truth, he may have been a world class jerk, but in order to argue that he shouldn't be on the team, I basically pulled stuff out of a barrell. The guy put a lot of runs on the scoreboard. Period.

I think the Ducks new owner is getting away from that stuff. They won't be the Ducks next year. I don't even think Ducks is on the sweaters this year. They are just "Anaheim".

They want to market themselves as being an Orange County team. Which isn't a bad idea considering the troubled state of the NHL.

157
There are few batters whom I find more fearsome than Gary Sheffield. Even at this stage of his career.

I still remember him in a game against Houston and he was sent up to pinch hit against Billy Wagner. He had his bat waggling. My friend asked me, "How can he hit a fastball if he's doing that?"
I told her to just wait.

And Sheffield got a fastball he wanted and ripped a single that gave the Dodgers a lead.

I wonder why the Lo Duca/Mota for Penny/Choi trade is considered to be so horrible while the Piazza/Zeile for Sheffield/Bonilla/Eisenreich trade seems to have passed in to the hazy parts of everyone's memory?

Please God let us get Abreu.

I think Abreu needs to have his character approved by Plaschke first. I'm certain something is lacking. If he had good character, wouldn't the Phillies had gone to the playoffs?

And besides, Kevin Stocker had more character.

Abreu would be well-liked in LA, as are most Latin ballplayers.

Drew/Kent/Abreu middle of order would be nice.

159 - Mostly time, I think.

Amazing to think that Piazza has now spent more time in a Mets uni than a Dodgers.

128 Rant, part 2:

There is more to it than this, but I'll address Blue22's point now. IF Ed Wade is kept on for another year, which will probably happen since ownership sees this as a successful season, then Abreu stays. If Wade is fired, I think Abreu is likely to be dealt. The two are tied so closely together since Abreu is the one deal nobody can disagree Wade got the better end of, similar to Kazmir for Zambrano in Tampa.

With that said, I think Abreu's personality and lack of connection with the fans, embodies the entire Ed Wade era. Philly fans are sick of a team that doesn't look like they care about results. That's why we ran Travis Lee out of town. In addition, management has been unwilling to make that one bold deal to pick a year and go all-out to win.

Look at what the Phils have given up since Wade came along: Scott Rolen, Curt Schilling, Johnny Estrada, Adam Eaton, Carlos Silva, and Marlon Byrd. What do we have to show for these? Well, Urbina for Polanco but he will walk, Padilla is the only leftover from the Schilling deal, and...Endy Chavez?

What I (and I think most Philly fans) want to see is a quick, 1-2 year rebuild around a core of Burrell, Utley, Howard, Madson, and Myers. Everybody else can go. The Indians have done it this year, the Dodgers are very close, a quick turnaround CAN be done.

But Ed Wade is not the man to do it. The biggest holes on this team are entirely of his doing:

3B: Waited too long to trade Rolen, then signed a rapidly aging David Bell to bring in some "playoff experience". The Cards have made the playoffs 3 of the 4 years since, while we are stuck on 86-76

C: Not only did he trade Estrada to Atlanta, where he has become an All-star and helped further that infernal streak, Wade has also become addicted to washed-up veterans. He can't dump Lieberthal (who I think is a FA after this season...?), he has picked up Pratt and Kelly Stinnett and Gary Bennett and Tom Prince etc etc to fill in during the inevitable injury to #24.

P: How many young arms has Wade just thrown away? The trades for just Wagner, Lidle, and Milton cost us FIVE younger, cheaper arms, one of which has already turned out to have the lowest walk/K rate..ever?

We have had a top-5 payroll the last 3 seasons and yet still cannot win when it counts. The best thing for this team would be a trade like what I proposed earlier this season: Abreu for young 3B, C, and/or P prospects. I would go after Barton first, but I think the Dodgers match up well too. Nate disagrees :)

But shipping out Abreu and Thome for younger, cheaper players and building around the core that is mostly already here (add Cole Hamels and Shane Victorino to that list) would produce a team the fans can relate to, would be fun to watch, and most importantly can make that big late season deal to put us over the top.

I envy you guys, at least your GM knows where he is taking the team and has moved to act on it. I hope we bring somebody in as soon as possible to do the same, before it is too late.

Thanks to www.fireedwade.com

And sorry but that rant was about 8 years in the making, I kept it as short (and as clean) as I could :-D

And Abreu would save McCourt laundry charges.

Oh yeah, in my list of teams that I hate; include any team Gary Sheffield is on. Anyone who threatens not to play hard in order to renegotiate a contract is a total POS.

I'm assuming Bobby Abreu's dry cleaning is point #500 on www.fireedwade.com, because there's plenty there. Just the two trades he made with for Chavez and Urbina alone were legendarily bad.

159 Seems to have passed into the hazy part of your memory. We also got Charles Johnson. And a PTBNL as I recall. Hmm, maybe's its in the hazy part of my memory, too.

Actually, I think people still complain about that trade a lot. One of the biggest factors in the LoDuca trade backlash was that people felt like they were re-living Piazza. A huge, and somewhat misapplied complement to LoDuca.

A big mitigating factor for me is that Bonilla, as a Dodger, started the only triple play I've seen in person.

The NY Times ran a graphic of Piazza's "best" season which was supposed to be 1999.

Although he was better in 1997 with the Dodgers. He had an OPS+ that year of 186! His OPS was 1070.

Piazza has the highest single season OPS+ of any Dodger. EVER. Back to 1884. Interestingly, the higest OPS+ for a career by any Dodger is 161 by Sheffield. Piazza's career was 160.

I hate Larry Walker for robbing Piazza of the MVP in 1997.

that's larry walk-AIR for the french canadian readers.

Well, back to back 40 bomb 100 RBI years is making me hate what I feel was the worst trade in recent dodger times. I know I am a minority in this.

Konerko for Jeff Shaw.

162 - I would pay good money to see an outfield of Drew, Bradley, and Abreu.

It would look an awful lot like the Giants did for about six innings last night.

159 - Did Sheffield ever hit more homers in a meaningless Home Run Derby than he had in an entire SEASON beforehand, then hit what, 2 in the next month after?

The attitude you find in a Sheffield, a Bonds, even a Milton Bradley is what a lot of fans out there respond to, and what can separate the truly elite (and feared) players from those who just put up good numbers.

When (Phillies again, sorry) Pat Burrell had his two years from hell, he was throwing helmets all over the place and took extra BP until he worked his way through it. Abreu has never done anything remotely like this, as far as we know.

And don't even think about batting him leadoff. OK. Seriously gonna go do hw now.

171 -- There is no way you are a minority in that.

171 - Worst Dodger trade ever? Is this even a debate? I...

Vote
for
Pedro

Mr.Ungar, Delino DeShields for you on line 2.

I was ok with the Konerko trade at the time. I thought he was the reincarnation of Franklin Stubbs.

174 -- Is that recent times?

167 - The Urbina trade opened a spot for Utley since Charlie Manuel refused to sit Bell for Polanco. I think that turned out well.

Until Manuel ran our three decent relievers into the ground, Felipe Alou-style.

177 To me it never happened. It just didn't.

171-179:

Delino for Pedro

(or "D4P" if you prefer)

well, my reason for hating the konerko for shaw deal more was the thought I had about it at the time, not so much now in retrospect.

I was excited to get Delino, even though he tanked so bad that my excitment went to hatred like the rest of us, but at the time, a middle relife arm (a damn good one) for a starting all star 2b with alot of speed didn't seem so wrong.

A light tossing closer at the break for one of our top young prospect when we were at least 5 games out of the race seemed desperate and dumb.

Ed Wade hired Charlie Manuel! Sit Bell, play Polanco, and don't trade your best chit for a washed-up middle reliever! GMs "fixing" the problems of their idiot managers don't get a lot of sympathy around these parts.

My dad is a huge Cubs fan, and he's got one of those Crown Books bargain basement coffe table things on the Cubs that he keeps in the bathroom. Book came out in the late 80s. Every time I'm over to visit, I turn to a photo of Jamie Moyer, the caption of which says (paraphrasing), "Promising left hander Jamie Moyer had a good year for the Cubs in 8x. He was traded, along with Raphael Palmeiro, to Texas. The Cubs, though, got Mitch Williams and Paul Kilgus in the deal, so the trade looks pretty good so far."

D4P was the worst trade of all time if that was the time frame considered. I hated DeShields at the time, for all the reasons you can probably guess.

184 - I was dating a girl from Delaware during Delino's first season with the Dodgers. Delightful Delino DeShields from Delaware. There was a bond ... the bond faded.

185
I believe Jon's post is false on its face because I am convinced that the state of Delaware does not exist and was created just for tax purposes.

There is no Delaware.

Since we discussed football briefly, I will note that Skip Bayless's latest advocates getting rid of kickers because (get this) they have no "heart" or "soul." No. Really.

186 - George Thorogood's band destroyed an imaginary state? Bitchin'!

187
My biggest problem with them is the single-bar face mask.

Courtesy of firejoemorgan.com:

Morgan has this to say about the upcoming Red Sox/Yankees series

Besides the pitching, the other X-factor is the hitting.

Priceless

189
Didn't QBs wear those as well? Now they just wear a skirt.

[100] - hah, that reminds me, i used to absolutely despise the broncos and cowboys. the broncos because i hate john elway and the cowboys because they were one of the biggest and most annoying and arrogant-seeming bandwagon teams ever. now they suck and i don't care one way or the other.

187 A seeming contradiction with the oft-practiced strategy of calling a time-out to "freeze" the kicker. If America's football fields are, in fact, plagued with the kicking automoton/zombies, then it may be too late to just "get rid of them." Head for the shelters.

Shawn Chacon

2004 w/COL 63 IP, 71 H, 52 BB, 52 K, 7.11 ERA
2005 w/COL 73 IP, 69 H, 36 BB, 39 K, 4.09 ERA
2005 w/NYY 78 IP, 63 H, 30 BB, 40 K, 2.76 ERA

Apparently, Kibbles & Bits makes one lose his hair.

http://www.yard-work.org/?p=406

194 The humidity of New York seems to agree with him.

The seasons of Shawn Chacon and Aaron Small with the Yankees this year offend my sensibilities as a baseball fan. Especially Aaron Small. He's like Derek Lowe light. And he's 9-0.

And he will probably be 10-0 after tonight's massacre of what is left of the Orioles.

155 This reminds me of Jim Edmonds' relationship with the Angels and fans. He didn't act as though he cared enough, I guess. All he's done since is put himself in the Hall of Fame (not to mention a brief World Series).

Let's hope Abreu comes here and does the same.

The Orioles are batting their outfielders 7-8-9 tonight.

Surhoff, Matos, and Newhan

You know who's got to be enjoying a Red Sox/Indians playoff hunt the most? Alex Cora. The guy is pretty much guaranteed a playoff bonus. And he might get two.

What is the Yankees playoff rotation? They get to choose between the rapidly aging Johnson and Mussina, Chacon (one year off a 7+ ERA), 33 yr old AAAA journeyman Small, and the 25 yr old rookie Wang (who, depite Yankee fans thinking otherwise, is not the best rookie pitcher)

Group Random Dodger Game Callback

September 29, 1607

Run with it...

Which Hall of Fame is Jim Edmonds going in? Not the one in Cooperstown methinks. He will be going to the Hall of the Very Good.

It's in Syracuse.

194 BP pretty much predicted this, or at least that Chacon would do well, when the Yanks got him. His K/W and h/9 numbers were solid for Colorado, I believe.

201
I don't remember much about that game, other than Jesse Orosco striking out Julio Franco to seal the Dodger victory.

Well, if you meant 1907, then, as every Dodger fan surely knows, we played a doubleheader with the Cubs. Won the first, 5-2, and tied in the second 2-2. Either darkness, Alex Cora fouling off hundreds of pitches, or both.

204
Oh, and that was back when Orosco still pitched right-handed. You weren't allowed to be (or pitch) left-handed back then, as left-handedness was associated with heresy and witchcraft.

http://www.jamestown1607.org/

starting lineups posted here.

Pocahontas
james
newport
smith
rolfe
smith
white
james
smith

205 - I meant 1607.

Sheesh, Pocahontas in the leadoff spot again? She's getting more mileage out of that "I saved John Smith from being executed" than Rick Monday did with the flag!

She's got no power and she gets a poor jump on the bases.

And she throws like a girl!

And while it's been said that Jim Tracy can carve lineups out of driftwood, I hear that the manager of the Jamestown squad can paint with all the colors of the wind.

Well the Orioles kept it close for three batters tonight...

202 Edmonds is at 331 homers at 35 years old, and should get past 400. Career numbers are .291/.384/.542 in 13 seasons. PECOTA's list of comparable players includes Reggie Jackson, Stargell, Bonds, Mantle, Mays, McCovey, McGwire, Frank Robinson and Killebrew in the top 20.

Throw in his stack of Golden Glove awards, many of which he won out from under Andruw Jones, and you've gotta figure he's got a chance.

Whether or not he ends up in the Hall, he's a far better player than the Angels had him figured for.

You'd have to be an idiot to bat Pocahontas leadoff. No plate discipline

Hmm...might be smart if I read previous comments before doing a Pocahontas joke.

213 I don't know, she had some pretty heavy hitters following her for much of her career.

If Winthrop keeps benching John Alden and playing that no-talent hack Smith instead, I'm going to start firegovernorwinthrop.com

Surprised at Jerry Narron's re-signing. Lou Pinella is so fondly thought of in Cinci. I was in town last Friday, and several of Narron's regulars had already started the offseason, watching their efforts playing defense. Hmmmm.

212 - Didn't the Angels trade Edmonds for character/chemistry reasons? I remember him seeming like something of a prima donna/me-first type. Definitely no David Eckstein.

The Angels thought Edmonds didn't do enough to rehab injuries. And he wasn't as gutty as Gary DiSarcina. The New England version of Cesar Izturis. Except he didn't field as well.

I hear there are rumors that Smith is doping with some leafy substance that he smokes in between games.

Anyone watching the Yankees game? They are criticizing Miguel Tejada for not "hustling" and showing replays of Jeter running. I guess they have to provide evidence for why Jeter is the best shortstop in the majors.

220
The farmer who sold it to him (by the name of Reynolds) avers that it's perfectly safe.

187, 189

I have a problem with kickers but it's not because of a lack of heart and soul. I don't like the idea of the same 22 guys (+ subs) playing a game for 59:57 to a tie, and then having the game come down to a little white guy who hasn't done anything the entire game. I understand the historical reasons for the kicker, but letting him decide a tie game with 3 seconds left seems so much like flipping a coin or paying a game of scrabble as a tiebreaker.

221 - Say, is this your first time watching a Yankees game on TV? ;)

I just mean fawning over Jeter seems to happen pretty much every time he's on TV. It's a psych experiment in action: you notice it because you've been told a million times to look for it. When Jeter forgets to back up a throw, or doesn't take the relay man out on a DP, it doesn't get brought up.

223 - I hear you, but with no kickers, there's no field goals, and without field goals or some other way of non-endzone scoring, football would be a very different game. You could maybe give teams an automatic 3 points if they get the ball to the opponent's 35, then give them the option to go for 6 or lose the 3 if they fail to score. But that makes my head hurt.

I'd feel the same way about little white guys, but football has become so specialized with long-snappers, kickoff-only placekickers, coverage men, 3rd-down backs, Doug Flutie, etc. that it's not like you'd go back to the days of two-way football and Bronco Nagurski by eliminating kickers.

Wasn't 1607 the year that all the players from Saint Augustine were supposed to join the big club and take them to the top? Everyone was really high on this kid Don Pedro the Destroyer.

Beltre has gone 2-3 with some singles and a walk tonight, for an OPS of .721. He trails Jayson Werth by only .002 now

Based on current trends, it will be Chicago vs. the Angels and the Yankees vs. the Indians in the playoffs next week. Current as of this moment. Subject to change.

225 - Yeah I agree, you can't really do without them. It's just... a strange part of the game that I don't full accept. And probably the main reason why I don't like football as much as basketball or baseball.

A rare off night for Sunny Kim in Colorado, 5 IP, 7ER, v the Mets.

You guys are doing great with 1607 but for a quick trip back to the present I think I'm going to have to root for the Yankees against the Sox this weekend for the 1st time in my life. I'd rather see the Tribe this year then the Sox and I don't think the Sox will sweep NY given the collapse of their pitching.

Hope Lake Manor survives the night as it is one of the great places that no one knows about in the San Fernando valley. I take that route using Valley Circle to go to the Dodger games. I'll be home tonight as my wife said she'd kill me if I went to the game even though we are in no danger.

Nothing special back in '05

3B Aybar
1B Choi
SS Robles
2B Kent
RF Cruz
C Navarro
LF Werth
CF Repko
P Perez

Derek Lee HR #46. Cubs 2-1 over Houston.

Have we reached the point where Choi starting at first base is "nothing special?" So soon they forget . . .

Yay Choi is playing.

Does tonight set a record for "earliest lineup released by Tracy"?

Choi watch: Choi is currenly OPSing .799. Hopefully he can get that up to the land of .800.

Back in 1607, the Jamestown manager is finding it very hard to predict his squad's likely performance from season to season. If only that Newton guy would get born already so we could get some mathematics invented.

And though the team hasn't a thing to eat, the team alchemy hath never been higher.