Who's getting paid, Maddux? or the Padres?

Tom, interesting stats. What is the boost in HR/PA that a player gets at home vs road? Also, did you calculate these numbers yourself, or where did you pull them from? What years are included in these stats?
Thanks.
vr, Xei

If so, no big deal. A (presumably) rich team pays off a not-as-rich team for one of its players. That's the natural order of things in the jungle.

If the cash considerations were going the other way, that's another story.

There must be something better to do there than read this stuff.

I guess the guy just loves his new toy.

Plus my friends aren't coming up until tomorrow. I have to pace myself.

Oh, and someone tell Mr. Colletti that acquiring washed-up FORMERLY great players is actually pretty easy. That's why he's able to do it.

The Dodgers will pay the Padres later for the use of their hose to put out a fire.

Meanwhile, Matt Kemp and Manny Ramirez will save the world from fascism.

"The 37-year-old veteran is heading to the Red Sox for a player to be named later or cash considerations."

Well, he BA'd .331 last season...

Judas!

Oooh, now I expect BH to call you a liar and say he doesn't believe you, followed by an amazing version of his most well known post.

By HR/(PA-IBB-SH), Dunn has been .0654 in CIN and .0544 elsewhere; the "norm" as above is .0288 at home and .0275 away. So, a 20.1% gain for Dunn instead of a 4.7% gain. His wOBA on the three true outcomes (including HBP, excluding IBB) has been .495 at home and .458 away. The 03-07 ML had a .429 wOBA on TTO at home against .401 on the road. So, Dunn has been 8% better on those against the norm of 6.9%.

I have a way of splitting up wOBA (right now, ROE not included) between Plate contribution (K, BB, and number of balls put into play) and Yard contribution (i.e., how well the ball traveled - 1B, 2B, 3B, HR, Outs in play); might publish the details some day. Anyway, Dunn's Plate is .327 H / .325 R, vs. 03-07ML's .334 H / .329 R. Dunn's Yard is .396 H / .379 R vs. 03-07ML's .335 H / .328 R.

While GABP has helped Dunn's raw totals, it has not done so to a greater extent than the typical park factors used to adjust his numbers would suggest.

http://tinyurl.com/6bb899

http://insidethedodgers.mlblogs.com/archives/2008/08/maddux_is_official.html

* Spend a day at the stadium with Josh Rawitch, the key behind-the-scenes link between the players and the press. See how game-day stats are assembled, how to handle questions from reporters on deadlines. Experience the fast-paced excitement of Major League Baseball from the inside.

* Meeting Joe Torre and taking part in his pregame media session

* Standing on the field at Dodger Stadium for the National Anthem

* A private tour of the stadium, including areas that the public tour doesn't go (underground batting cages, player's lounge, Dodger offices, press box, broadcast booths, DodgerVision booth...

* every day of my job requires me to interact with all of the Dodger broadcasters

* I spend about an hour of each day in the Dodger clubhouse, as would the fan who purchases the package to go Inside the Dodgers.

High bid currently $430.

It worked for me about 3 hours ago.

Penny doesn't really need his number right now, right?

Highest Slugging Pct in August, NL Players, 2008

(minimum 40 AB)

Ty Wigginton, Hou .932
Ryan Ludwick, StL .803
Andre Ethier, LAD .786
Manny Ramirez, LAD .780

"Each of the Dodgers' last nine games have been decided by one or two runs. They are 6-3 in that stretch, including wins in six of the last seven. Beginning July 23, in fact, 20 of the Dodgers' 24 games have been decided by three runs or less. Los Angeles is 11-9 in those 20 games and 15-9 overall in that time. The Dodgers are 17-18 in one-run games and 11-14 in two-run contests."

The Lahman database doesn't provide data for particular outfield usages prior to 1995 (i.e., the "OF" designation is widespread), making it difficult to say with any certainty how things broke down. Nevertheless, and relaxing things a bit for the sake of convenience (RoY only, any named position, including pitchers and DHs):

1962-64 Giants, OF: Cepeda, Kuenn, Mays, McCovey
1964-65 Giants, 1B: Cepeda, Kuenn, Mays, McCovey
1958-59 Senators, OF: Bob Allison, Albie Pearson, Roy Sievers
1959, 1961-1964 Dodgers, OF: Jim Gilliam, Frank Howard, Wally Moon
1976 Yankees, DH: Chris Chambliss, Thurman Munson, Lou Piniella
1977 Mets, P: John Matlack, Tom Seaver, Pat Zachry
1980-81 Dodgers, P: Steve Howe, Rick Sutcliffe, Fernando Valenzuela
1983 Dodgers, P: Steve Howe, Fernando Valenzuela, Pat Zachry
1986 White Sox, DH: Carlton Fisk, Ozzie Guillen, Ron Kittle
1993 Orioles, P: Gregg Olson, Rick Sutcliffe, Fernando Valenzuela
2000 Yankees, DH: Jose Canseco, David Justice, Chuck Knoblauch

Thanks, just found Jon's post linking it from the previous thread.

That would fit with the current philosophy.

So, it looks like it's a salary dump. If the Dodgers don't like the Padres player decisions they can write them a nice check and say no thanks.

I kayaked in Morro Bay once and saw quite a few otters; it was awesome.

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3543296

Not too worried.
vr, Xei

In any case, we might be sending the Padres two minor leaguers or we might be sending them cash. I don't see that it's worth trying to play the guessing game until the answer just comes.

Ken Gurnick wrote this of Maddux:
"Maddux went a tough-luck 6-9 with 11 no-decisions and a 3.99 ERA for San Diego." Where exactly did the tough luck come in? The Padres have scored 3.82 runs per game, and Maddux has allowed 4.70. I actually think Maddux is still a slightly above average SP (NL SP have .486 Wins/Decision), but to call that 6-9 tough luck is a huge stretch.

It all depends on who's doing the considering, and who doesn't have any cash.

it's the "best fit" regression formula for converting the fielding independent pitching stats into ERA (developed by Tom Tango, I believe).
vr, Xei

It looks like the diff. b/w ERA and FIP is bigger on the road - so it's the latter, right?

Please 'splain the implications of the stats you just provided, if you're so inclined. My brain is suffering from a lack of lunch.

>> Rangers All-Star second baseman Ian Kinsler was placed on the 15-day disabled list Monday with a sports hernia, and could be headed for season-ending surgery. <<

http://tinyurl.com/5ljfus

This is bad news. See Abreu, Tony.

91 If I recall correctly, his BABIP split has been .230 at Home and .350 on the road this season. Keep in mind that the denominator in FIP is IP, which is BABIP-impacted.

Any idea what the "r-squareds" usually are on such models...?

Interesting in Maddux's case. That his home and road FIP are so similar means that he gives up more HRs and BBs in Petco than I would have expected. I'd think that for a control pitcher, Petco would be nirvana - just toss up hittable (but not crushable) balls and let the defense run under them.

Dodger Stadium's slightly better-than-average HR factor plus a pretty lousy defense suggest that a Maddux who could not even take full advantage of PETCO (more lucky than good, evidently) might be hard to watch here.

Anyone recognize who he is with?