Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Buster Olney of ESPN.com offers an analysis of the Manny Ramirez situation that might be the most cogent I've seen from a national writer.
Executives around baseball ... are having a difficult time envisioning how Ramirez would make more in salary in 2009 than if he accepted arbitration. He made $20 million last season -- although the present-day value was just a little more than $17 million -- and following a historic performance in which Ramirez hit .396 for the Dodgers in two months, driving in 53 runs in 53 games, his arbitration award would be breathtaking. Boras would be in position to set a new and stunning standard through that process, and could ask for A-Rod money.
But accepting arbitration would represent a staggering surrender for Ramirez, who had hoped for a nine-figure contract, and for Boras, who has been talking a deal for as long as six years for the 36-year-old outfielder. One year for $28 million is a long way from 4 years, $100 million, or six years, $150 million. Some friends of Ramirez do not believe that he will allow Boras to take arbitration, as tempting as it may be. "This is not going to be an easy time for Scott," a friend of Ramirez said.
The Dodgers now are perfectly positioned. They have twice dangled Ramirez opportunities for record-setting contracts -- the first being the $45 million offer, which would have established a new standard for outfielders, and the second being the arbitration. If Ramirez accepts the arbitration, the Dodgers would have only a one-year obligation on the aging slugger, and while none of the Dodgers staffers would ever say it out loud, keeping Ramirez on a one-year deal, with the carrot of free agency in front of him, might be the best way to keep him running hard. ...
I think it goes without saying out loud that the Dodgers would prefer to have Ramirez on the shortest-length contract possible. In any event, Olney continues ...
If he doesn't accept arbitration, they can say, legitimately, Hey, we really tried to keep him. They are willing to risk paying Ramirez as much as $30 million, which would seem to be the high end of any arbitration award, for just one season. If he signed elsewhere, most likely with a second-division team, then the Dodgers would get two draft picks as compensation, not bad considering that to date, they haven't paid Ramirez a dime in salary.
Two quibbles with this paragraph. Simply offering Ramirez arbitration, even with the high salary potential, won't alone be enough to constitute a sufficient effort toward keeping Ramirez in the eyes of many Dodger fans. Secondly, Olney seems to forget that the two draft picks in compensation would be replacing Andy LaRoche and Bryan Morris, for what that's worth.
But Olney goes on to make a sound point, especially considering how the free agent market has evolved this offseason.
There has been a push from the media in L.A. for the Dodgers to go to a third or fourth year to sign Ramirez, but a question that should be considered is this: Who, exactly, is competing with the Dodgers' offers? What force in the market would appear to compel them go beyond what they have on the table? And wouldn't it be poor management to compete with your own offer?
Many of the traditional big-money teams won't be involved. The Red Sox aren't interested, of course, and the owners of the Mets are faced with the real concern that their new ballpark is named for a company that has been involved in bailout talks, as Richard Sandomir wrote this morning; internally, the Mets are talking very conservatively, reserving their available cash for pitching. If you thought the Yankees might emerge as a Ramirez bidder, keep in mind that they already have Xavier Nady, Hideki Matsui and Johnny Damon as corner outfielders, and earlier this week, they decided not to offer Bobby Abreu arbitration because of the risk that he might get $16 million a year. Ramirez might wish for a big Yankee offer, but New York is not suddenly going to generate a $100 million proposal for him, or even anything remotely close to what Ramirez could make in arbitration with the Dodgers. ...
Olney also addresses the Angels, Giants and Orioles but finds them unlikely partners with Ramirez.
Olney concludes by linking to a Kurt Streeter column in today's Times that actually credits Jamie McCourt for stating the obvious - ballplayers sure make a lot more money than an egalitarian society would want. T.J. Simers gets closer to the real lesson - any serious conversation involving the Dodgers and their fans about the economy should start with what the Dodgers will do for their actual customers.
Update: Kevin Goldstein has his Dodger prospect report up at Baseball Prospectus. He puts 2008 top draft pick Ethan Martin first, ahead of Ivan DeJesus, Jr., James McDonald, Scott Elbert and Andrew Lambo, though he writes about Martin that "the gap between what he is now and what he can be is about as wide as the Grand Canyon, and there is plenty of time for things to go wrong."
Also, Don Stanhouse fans need to check out Cardboard Gods today.
First the housing market, then the stock market, now the corner outfield market. Manny might need a bailout.
Leave it to the Dodgers to end up paying out the most expensive single-season salary in baseball history at a time when free-agent salaries are crashing.
This whole thing kind of feels like the Vlad situation all over again.
I wonder who will play SS for the Padres. Oscar Robles:)
Tell that to Edgar Renteria. He just made out rather nicely.
(That will only worry me if it's a precursor to a CC signing, which sounds possible now.)
--
If they did sign Manny to a shorter contract could that make it possible to then also offer CC a large contract, or is it still one or the other..?
Sigh. Time to find a bar that will show the Colts/Bengals game...
The West is so weak that everyone is a contender right now except the Padres. The Diamondbacks lost Dunn, draft picks, Owens, Randy Johnson, and Hudson, while picking back up nothing. The Rockies lost Holliday and Fuentes and how much will the players they got for Holliday help this season. The Giants lost nobody, filling out their bullpen and brought in Renteria a huge upgrade over what they got from SS last year even if he isn't what he used to be. Then again he's only one year removed from a very good 2007 season in the NL where he has been a much better player. The staff may have the best one / two punch in baseball. With a little tinkering I think they can contend.
I dont think thats an improvement.
...and how his knee has been hurting lately. If we "win" the contract negotiations with Boras, I sincerely worry about the effort he will be putting forth. Of course Manny can hit .310/.390/.560 even when he is agitated at ownership.
I always wanted a Cabrera in the Dodger lineup but the first name was Miggy not Orlando.
This is the feeling I should have had two years ago when the Giants were trying to sign Pierre.
Looks like it is Hu or Bartlett for us.
Please God let Cabrera sign with someone else tomorrow.
The scary thing would be if it pushes Ned to make some stupid moves in response, instead of smart, measured ones. I'd rather them do what they're doing now, which is measuring and gauging and not rushing into panic mode. But they could still hit panic mode.
Btw, I wonder if Pierre will be dangled during the meetings...
He's a veteran.
He's more BA than OPS.
I'd be surprised if the Dodgers dont sign him.
Tex should be the Dodgers franchise player for the next 8 years and should sign him at 8/160.
Sign Lowe to 4/60. Sign Furcal at 3/45. Then trade for Atkins and tie him up for 8 yrs and trade for Putz. Trade Pierre, Hu, Loney and any of the AAA starters since they won't be needed for several years and we will have a new crop coming up in 3-4 years.
This would have an infield of Tex/Blake/Furcal/Adkins and outfield of Manny/Kemp/Ethier with Lowe as a #1 and Putz to close with Brox.
You figure out the cost, but it would be less than signing CC or Manny to long term contracts and the Dodgers would be set for 6-8 years in the infield - we have several options in 3 years at SS even without Hu.
I agree, he has already been Ned stamped unless Frank says No because Ballfield number 47 needs to be funded.
Not sure how that would be cheaper since you would spend $50 million per year on Atkins, Tex, and Furcal over the next three years alone while Manny or CC would only cost half of that.
Tex - $20M
Lowe - $15M
Furcal - $15M
Atkins - $8M
Putz - $5M
Pierre - $5M (to trade him)
So that's nearly $90M added to the current $65M or so payroll. And LA trades nearly every young player of value in the Putz, Atkins, and Pierre trades. Good gravy!
I'm with you on this. Ned's issue has never been aggressiveness. I like the patience he is showing with Manny and the SS situation. I think we will miss out on CC, but I like the idea of Pettite/Johnson on a one year deal and going after Oliver Perez if the price is right.
35
I don't disagree with your premise entirely as I think that Loney could be traded for pitching and Tex could be our offensive centerpiece. However, overspending on Furcal and Lowe while trading a lot of our young talent seems like the type of thing we at DT have been railing against since Colletti took over.
Ned doesn't give out deals longer than 3 years, unless you're a proven gamer with a ring like Juan Pierre.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I give you A.J. Burnett.
If Atkins could play 3b, I wouldnt mind bringing him in. I definitely wouldnt sign him up for 8 years.
Rosenthal believes the Dodgers will renew talks for Robinson Cano at the Winter Meetings, and the Dodgers will again ask for Matt Kemp.
So it must be a 3 team trade, we recieve Cano, The Yankees recieve Kemp, Team X recieves prospects and Kemp and they trade Kemp to the Dodgers.
Garrett Atkins: 97 OPS+, -11 defense
Garrett Atkins is a bad player.
2006: 79 BBs, 76 Ks
2008: 40 BBs, 100 Ks
What happened...?
He missed.
He's entering what should be his prime.
It is troubling that he's gotten worse the last 3yrs:
2006 - 136 OPS+
2007 - 112 OPS+
2008 - 97 OPS+
He was bad in 2008, but it might be a bit early to label him a bad player altogether.
Sure, we'll give you Kemp for Cano...and Joba. I swear, teams continue to just ask for stupid deals from the Dodgers.
Right, Santana/Melona for Blake is the benchmark to work from.
Dejan Kovaevic really wants the Dodgers to trade for Jack Wilson.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Dodgers Top 11 Prospects
by Kevin Goldstein
Sweet! Let's go after LeBron James!
2005- .648 OPS
2006- .933 OPS
2007- .773 OPS
2008- .661 OPS
Highlight "suggestions" include:
1. Sign Lowe for four years and $62 million. He's the best fit for this team and this payroll, and there should be some value to Lowe in not having to relocate. If there's not, ply him with additional money.
2. Trade Paul and Victor Garate to the Brewers for Weeks; then make Weeks a centerfielder. It's a low bid, and honestly, I'm skeptical enough of DeJesus' power and ability to play shortstop than I might deal him if that's what it took to get Weeks.
3. Sign Durham for two years, $8 million. The extra year is designed to get this over with quickly, as the falloff from Durham to the next option is steep enough to want to avoid the question. If Durham is done, this is an easy contract to eat. Speaking of which...
4. Release Jones. Ideally, you could get him to agree to a buyout, where he takes 60 cents on the dollar and gets to hit the market again, choosing that ahead of a season in which he bats 125 times as the Dodgers' fifth outfielder. There's no place for him on this roster.
5. Sign Javier Valentin. He starts 30-35 games against good right-handed pitchers and is a very good pinch-hitter the rest of the time.
6. Re-sign Takashi Saito. Offer him a high-upside deal. It's not likely there's much guaranteed money available for him, and he's one of those "good or unavailable" guys.
These things done, my 2009 Dodgers:
Weeks CF
Ethier LF
Kemp RF
Loney 1B
Martin C
Durham 2B
DeWitt 3B
Hu SS
Bench: Pierre, Valentin, Delwyn Young, Tony Abreu, Jason Repko
Rotation: Lowe, Billingsley, Kershaw, Kuroda, Kuo, Schmidt
Bullpen: Broxton, Saito, Cory Wade, McDonald, Stults, Elbert
Guess that's why its free now, he turned it into an si.com column.
Your future team lost me with Atkins and the fact Teixeira has no desire to play for the Dodgers. So the cornerstone of your 8 year deals are either not desirable or not reality based.
I already have to apologize to JoeyP if Teixeira does not end up on the East Coast. Then again after playing on the right coast maybe he has gained appreciation for playing baseball in good weather but if so it will be with the Angels not the Dodgers.
How many times does it have to be pointed out that Saito, despite being old, is still under Dodgers control? Unless they non-tender him, he is going nowhere but LA or back to Japan. Why the need to offer a "high-upside deal?" You'd think a guy getting paid by two places for the same article would have a clue.
Really surprised he has Ethan Martin over McDonald and even DeJesus for that matter, though he concedes that the top five could be moved around...
BP:
1. Ethan Martin, RHP
2. Ivan De Jesus Jr., SS/2B
3. James McDonald, RHP
4. Scott Elbert, LHP
5. Andrew Lambo, LF
Three-Star Prospects
6. Josh Lindblom, RHP
7. Devaris Gordon, SS
8. Josh Bell, 3B
Two-Star Prospects
9. Pedro Baez, 3B
10. Kyle Russell, RF
11. Xavier Paul, CF
To compare, here are TBLA's voted rankings:
1.James McDonald
2. Ivan DeJesus
3. Andrew Lambo
4. Scott Elbert
5. Ethan Martin
6. Josh Lindblom
7. Austin Gallagher
8. Josh Bell
9.Chris Withrow
10.Xavier Paul
11.Nathan Eovaldi
12. Jamie Pedroza
13. Tony Delmonico
14 Devaris Strange-Gordon
Overall, I don't think this article is very encouraging.
1. 4 of the top 6 are pitchers (including Ethan Martin at 1), and young pitching is always tough to forecast.
2. There's no 5 star can't miss position player. Andrew Lambo may be able to hit, but it sounds like that may be all.
3. Josh Bell and Pedro Baez sound like true longshots.
4. Very weird to me that Devaris Gordon didn't start playing baseball until high school. Your father (Tom) pitches in the majors, and you're our least refined prospect?
What's not to like about trading a CF and a 2B for a 2B who you intend to play in CF while covering 2B with a 3B?
I would accept Manny dogging it to the tune of .299/.398/.529, playing in 91% of the team's games, as Manny did for Boston last year.
The man was an elite closer for no cost for 2.5 years, giving him a pay cut is horrible.
If only all our players "dogged" it like that
At any rate, Hoffman had a 5.08 ERA in the first half last year before posting a 1.59 ERA in the second. Hard to assess, but I don't see any guarantee that Hoffman would be a better pitcher or tutor than Saito.
http://tinyurl.com/5h89c4
I couldn't disagree with that idea more. Hoffman is the definition of a guy who has "lost some stuff," and we'd have to pay at least twice as much for him.
Maybe we should hire a coach whose specific duty is to coach the pitchers.
I had a coach like that in high school. Real name was Dick Little.
They had a title for the type of coaching he did...
He turned down $4 million from the organization that thinks he's a god. I wouldn't even want him for $4 million.
Isn't he more of a saver...?
No, he wanted to stay. They didn't really want him anymore, and he was upset by that.
He pulls his cap down, a la Dave Stewart, so sometimes it is hard to see los ojos.
I've discussed people's unfair perceptions of Broxton at exhaustive lengths this year - you should check the archives. Of course he will benefit from more seasoning, but there is no call for paying more than $4 million to an over-the-hill reliever.
I think you and I focus on different aspects of the game while watching.
Mike Singeltary would approve of Hoffman to the Dodgers.
1. ESPY
2. Golden Globe
3. Gold Glove
4. C. Montgomery Burns Award for Outsanding Efforts in the Field of Excellence
I saw a news special on LA Live yesterday, and I still don't understand what it all is. A lot of construction for now.
Just another case of the "closer" tage screwing a team. Just throw you best relievers in the highest leverage situation please.
No, that was an IMPORTANT award.
Thank You For Not ...
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
A closer is one the relief pitcher that gets paid out of proportion to the rest of the relief corp, and limiting Broxton's saves to limit his salary via the arbitration process might be worth signing Hoffman for one year.
ESPN Zone
Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar
Katsuya
Lawry's Carvery
New Zealand Natural
Rock'N Fish
Rosa Mexicano
Starbucks Coffee
The Farm of Beverly Hills
Trader Vic's
Wolfgang Puck Bar & Grill
Yard House
there's also an "upscale" bowling alley and two concert venues. They'll also be filming west coast sportscenter there.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Trader Vic's has too many werewolves in it for my taste.
-
I sentence any rule violators here to ten minutes on the Sporcle site, must complete a challenging quiz in the allotted time without embarrassing oneself before returning to DT.
Sounds a bit like Old Town corporate restaurants not worth eating at.
Not that I go there that often.
The only event I have seen there was the Scully/Wooden event.
The best food in the Staples center, IMO is the french dip sandwiches at the last remaining vestige of the Forum...
I opened up the "Friends" guest stars quiz and got scared.
I then took the Office character quiz, and I am sad to say I blanked on the "Supplier Relations"
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
LA Live will have a bit more of the "Blade Runner Interactive" feel to it.
What happened to the rule about discussing the Dodgers?
That's the first rule of Fight Club.
Still need more people living in downtown to make LA Live viable, if you ask me.
It is great for happy hour, but it ends too soon (6:00)
Edward Norton is one of the top 3 actors of his generation?
Compares it to a cruise ship, "The entirety of the AEG development downtown -- Staples plus L.A. Live -- is designed like an airtight cruise ship, turning not a welcoming face but the architectural equivalent of a massive hull to the neighbors. Its spillover effect may be measured not in gallons but in drops."
More: "When we trap the energy of an urban crowd inside this sort of self-contained world, and when we allow developers and their architects to heighten the differences between that world and the streets around it so dramatically, we help keep the rest of our blocks underused and, as pieces of the city, undernourished."
SportsNation Keith Law: The confused person here is Gardenhire. And seriously, shut your damn mouth before you devalue Young any more. I would be through the roof if I was a GM and my manager started popping off about a player like that. Just. Stop. Talking.
Holy crap, isn't Young their best outfielder?
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=23917
p.s.: I discovered the Pantry last month and LOVE their hamburger... and there's no reasonable explanation for it.
SportsNation Keith Law: Middle reliever, maybe setup guy.
That might make Bob happy.
Just like it sounds.
SportsNation Keith Law: Jones. But really, zero for both.
SportsNation Keith Law: That division is definitely within reach, and I have no objection to the Giants trying to improve their '09 club as long as they don't damage their '10-11 clubs in doing it, by trading prospects or blocking them. And seriously, no Jorge Cantu. Please.
This sounds strangely familiar. Oh, that's right this was the Dodgers plan in 07 and 08 and it blew up in their face.
SportsNation Keith Law: Haven't watched. Tivo'd an episode, never got around to it.
I agree, animal style will cover up those problems. Or, well done my friend.
Span is the one guy the Twins should keep. Young/Gomez I guess you can keep around and hope they figure it out. But neither can walk or hit home runs. Having both in the OF really limits an offense.
Yes, but isn't it a toy cannon?
Juan Pierre
Andruw Jones
I'd have said the Royals SS Tony Pena, but he lost his job midway thru last year.
Michael Bourn of the Astros had no business collecting as many ABs as he did.
At least it seems we're not interested in Cabrera.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2008/12/dodgers-still-l.html
Anyone know what Neifi!'s up to these days, and whether Ned still has him on speed dial...?
Funny thing about Span, at this time last year he had lost all his buzz, now he's the guy to keep, and the number pick in the 2003 draft is being relegated to 4th outfielder status. He may still work out but as of now Tampa Bay just picked the Twins pocket and you didn't see that happen very often in the past.
In money matters, the current bailout of wall street costs more(adjusted for inflation), the Louisiana Purchase, The Korean War, the New Deal, Vietnam War, and the Marshall Plan combined.
That must mean that the bailout would be that much more effective right?
Would you trade good young players for JJ or say screw it, just give Furcal the extra year?
I was trying to figure out who Ned might be interested in. Cristian Guzman? Marco Scutaro?
.239/.294/.359 in 599 Abs.
If you take into account what to expect from each position, that was awful. Pretty crazy he can have that steep of decline from his rookie season when he was on the cover of SI.
Have to admit I wouldn't mind Maicer Izturis playing SS for us if the Angels are happy with Aybar.
Something similar to the Dominican & Mexican leagues.
I remember 5 or 6 years ago, Baseball Prospectus predicted a Baseball Weekly cover featuring Kearns, Griffey, & Dunn and the title "Best OF Ever?"
That one didn't work out so much.
I would watch, but it would face stiff competition for ratings and attendance from both football and basketball.
Still, what's Norton's OPS+? It's gone down the last couple of years. ;-)
I guess the big plus they have going for them is the studio they purchased so that all of the work will be done in Southern California and none of the people involved have to travel.
Kevin McKidd from Rome is going to be Thor.
Kenneth Branagh is directing.
AGAHST!!
They are one of 4 things I miss desperately about So. Cal. Right behind the double-double, my mom and visits to Chavez Ravine.
Kenneth Branagh is directing
"Where art Thor?"
B) I actually really like In-N-Out fries, but to each their own. Father's Office wins on the burger+fry combo, though.
I knew Branagh was directing but I must have missed the pick of McKidd. Thanks for the info.
Don't get me started.
I thought he was great in that movie.
Y would have such an appeal on either TV or film if done properly.
[/grouchy old fart rant]
I think you are jumping the gun on McKidd. I don't see anything that says he's Thor other then himself touting that he's under consideration.
http://www.newsday.com/sports/baseball/yankees/ny-sppettitte1205,0,5277770.story
IMDB said it was done, but yeah I see that most articles say he is in contention.
2007 and '08 have now pretty much proven that age 21 season to be a fluke, though.
Say it aint so Joe! say it ain't so!
The on-screen chemistry between Rowdy Roddy and Keith David will never be replicated. NEVER!
I'm trying to think of a 6FU character who didn't at least occasionally give one the desire to punch them in the face. I can come up with Maya and Rabbi Ari and that's about it.
Macier Izturis wouldn't be a better bet than Hu or DeJesus, but he would definitely be better than Orlando Cabrera. And Izturis only has two years of arbitration left. Worst case, Izturis is hurt, gets non tender in the next off season, and the Dodgers waste a couple of million and a low prospect. But the award is league average production from a major league SS. And it prevents us from offering a bad deal to Cabrera which is the real award.
Randy Johnson and ...
ALIVE!
I would pay to see non-zombiefied people eating each other.
They are re-making Cannibal Holocaust. That can fill your lust.
True they were maddening characters but had just enough humanity that I kept watching and enjoying. All flawed but not overkill, I'm wondering if I missed the Ben Foster season because I'm drawing a blank.
And still had a grizzly playoff beard with subpar decisions in sport teams!
Really? What if you get 2007 Mussina and not 2008 Mussina?
I realize my Hoffman Eyes comment may be classified in Jon's warning, so I apologize if it was taken negatively--I just like bringing up the Closer's eye motif whenever I can.
I agree, it was a terrible call. No one thought he was any good except Yankee fans.
Giambi wouldn't be a bad choice as the first LH bat off the bench, assuming it is for $2m or less.
I did ask "other then Arod". I like Abreu's numbers but everyone keeps telling me he's one of the worse fielding outfielders in baseball and with his declining offensive skills, I'm not sure he'd be worth his salary demands.
You keep score like a girl.
I expected you to be a little more realistic. You are Eric Stephen after all and have a reputation.
Maybe we missed the same season.
Maybe I'm way off base here, but he strikes me as a pitcher who would be able to make the switch. Good breaking ball, good pitchability.
He'd have to be stretched out like any young pitcher, but him, Jmac, and Kershaw seem like a pretty good trio to rotate and occupy 2 rotation spots IMO.
Can anyone set me straight on why this is a bad idea? Too out of the box?
I love 6FU to death and consider it my favorite show, start to finish. But recent quarter-life crises means I won't be rewatching anything with such a focus on death for a while.
256 Given what I remember about Molly's tales on beach-ball-counting scorebook ways, I take that as a compliment! I am impervious!
Where is the market for Giambi? He strikes me as a guy who isn't going to find many takers.
Besides, I almost said Chuck Knoblauch. :)
Oh, now I remember. Maybe that is why he was so testosterone driven in Yuma?
A return to Oakland.
He might turn into just another junkballer with an 86 mph fastball and then we've transformed a good reliever into a useless starter.
This is total speculation of course.
The battle commences tonight! Can the Bruins return the favor to the Longhorns?
I can't decide if I like the normal or sweet potato fries better at Father's Office. But either with that burger and a Duvel or Hoegaarden and I am set.
I don't know but I'm' sure it will all be centered around the AL. The man can still hit(130OPS+) and last I looked the AL was littered with lousy DH including the team to the South unless Vlady takes to the role full time.
He certainly has the command to be a good starter, but I don't know if he has the repertoire.
"apparently want the Pirates to pick up a substantial share of Wilson's salary.."
Substantial = all of it?
Good burgers, overrated fries. Nothing more, nothing less.
My question is why we need a remake of Fame.
But honestly, while he seems like a good actor, he hasn't done enough film work for me to judge him yet...
In addition to the others already mentioned, I think Iron Man himself, Robert Downey Jr has to be mentioned, especially when you combine IM with Tropic Thunder from this past year, Scanner Darkly from not too long ago and so on. Dude's crazy but pretty amazing.
because according to Fame's theme song, it's 'gonna live forever'!!
Rick Barnes has been tolerant of these experiments so far but I hope it ends tonight. If it does, I think Texas will come out on top. The guard play is a little weak but the Longhorns have an incredible amount of skills and depth in the frontcourt.
--
If I'm going to do a remake of anything, it would have to be a movie that was kind of crummy the first time because of budget constraints and not much talent but had a good story, and isn't beloved by millions. And it certainly wouldn't be Fame.
--
I wonder if I'm the only one here who kinda likes Jack Wilson? Not that I'd want to give up much for him, mind.
Well James is going to be guarded by Shipp supposedly, so he has a good chance to get back on track tonight.
I am looking at you, Gus Van Sant.
Making money off the gullible public.
The burgers are great. The fries are good. What else you got?
How about this as a pointless remake? (Though people on imdb seem to inexplicably like it.) http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0084994/
Sweeney may retire:
ESPN's Jerry Crasnick talked to Mark Sweeney's agent Barry Axelrod, who says his client will probably only play next year if a Major League deal is offered. Sweeney, 39, hit .130/.250/.163 in 108 plate appearances for the Dodgers while earning $600K plus incentives.
I remember when NBC showed that.
Humphrey Bogart on one hand.
David Soul on the other.
Hmmm....
Sweeney...earned...incentives...?
Must...kill...self...Or...wait...must...kill...Ned...
A blogosphere turns its lonely eyes to you.
He didn't forget how many outs there were one time last season. Give the man a break.
"Somewhere That's Green" has a claim on best comedy song ever written. Just saying: when we have Comedy Song Thoughts, "Somewhere That's Green" belongs in the discussion.
He's fooling himself.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
It's not unlike getting a 400 on one's SATs by just showing up.
http://franklinavenue.blogspot.com/2008/12/first-look-at-grammy-museum.html
"amount plus incentives" sort of generically; the only incentive there's any evidence he actually earned and was paid for was the opening day roster one.
296 True, I once saw some of that original Maltese Falcon and it's quite dull and very dated. Huston + Bogart = success.
Other good remakes: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (still one of my fave horror films) and The Thing.
After the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame fiasco, I'm not setting foot in the Grammy Museum.
Jack Wilson is like an cheesy horror film. After a long battle, we were finally safe to assume it was dead with the trade to Det. Just when we think it's safe and sound they cut to a picture of Wilson on the ground dead, and than you see his eye peak open.
Robert Downy Junior is and has always been one of our top actors.
I like Mr. Garrison's, "It's Easy, Mmm-kay."
Been there, done that. 304
Which would explain his "never get on base in the first place" strategy.
290 It is kind of silly when we debate matters of taste heh?
Did you watch the Colbert Christmas special? The comedy songs were written by that show's head writer and Adam Schlessinger, the Fountains of Wayne guy. They are, for the most part, brilliant. Especially good was the Willie Nelson song. Stephen hallucinates that Willie is the "fourth wise man" come to visit Baby Jesus....
But do not spurn my gift completely
Yea, ye three wise men, please demur
I bring the plant that smokes more sweetly
Than either frankincense or myrrh
That's fine rhymin'.
GoodFellas
Casino
Mean Streets
Taxi Driver
Raging Bull
Last Temptation of Christ
King of Comedy
Bringing Out the Dead (very underrated)
Cape Fear (a well-done remake)
Gangs of New York, or Marty's segment from New York Stories
(Thank you, Sporcle)
Who said this?
"He is a complete player on both sides of the ball, a clutch performer and a winner," ____ said in a statement ___ announcing the deal. "He has the hardware to show it with the awards he has garnered and a World Series ring. We look forward to seeing him in a ___ uniform."
But The Departed is a fine gangster pic. And the Academy was dying to give Scorsese an Oscar after spurning his two best movies (Ordinary People is pretty good, but c'mon, Dances with Wolves?).
If, say, Goodfellas had won Best Pic/Best Director, as it should have, and then everything that happened to The Departed could still have happened except the Oscar win, would it still be overrated?
Sabean RE: Renteria?
I loved Infernal Affairs and was initially disappointed with The Departed, but it really grew on me. I'd put it above Bringing out the Dead (which, again, I liked) and Gangs of New York.
I guess a loss of velocity is a possibility if Wade were made into a starter. Maybe it's just because the two guys who I think of first when I think of starter vs. bullpen velocity (pacing yourself vs. airing it out) are Gagne and Billingsley, but for some reason I could see it being that there's a greater discrepancy in a flamethrower like Bills airing it out vs. pacing himself than there would be with a control guy like Wade.
Billingsley is a big strong dude, max effort, and so of course when he only has to make a few pitches he can light up the radar gun. Wade on the other hand is long and lean, and I'm willing to bet he could throw harder than 88-90 if he wanted to (I actually don't remember what kind of velocity Wade did show this past season but those numbers sound right to me).
It's just something that I get a sense of when I watch Wade pitch. I don't get the sense that if he were asked to throw 6 innings in a single outing he'd be out of breath, barely able to muster 84-86. Maybe a little dip, say 87-89, and then a little more as the season wore on. It doesn't seem like he's using a ton of energy when he throws his fastball.
But I am in the pure speculation boat as well, just glad to generate some discussion on this idea.
The Aviator
He really deserved to win Best Director in 2005
The McCourts - Inept, but they're saving us from themselves.
But what if there was a car that you could actually talk to? I remember they did that at Universal Studios when I was a pup.
337 - I think he's all but guaranteed a nomination. Anything more than that from me at this point would be more speculation than educated guess.
Baseball is art. There - problem solved.
Kinda along those lines, I saw the first non-black garbage collector today that I've ever seen in North Carolina.
The garbage collectors in SF are like the cast of It's A Small World. I know because they come to my neighborhood seven days a week, literally.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=3744237
--
Btw, speaking of the NBA, I wonder if Oklahoma City is having any second thoughts about acquiring their team from Seattle?
I think the dullest part of the Baseball Hall of Fame is the Hall of Fame part. The museum is the good stuff.
I went to the In & Out of the East coast today...
5 Guys Burgers and Fries...
WOW!!!! 5x better than In & out! Bigger burger...amazing toppings...and the fries....they got these cajun fries....omg......They just opened one up in Cerritos...you guys need to go!!! I honestly and debating if I should go back tonight and get one for dinner..
The Smithsonian Institution has art galleries as part of it. There is the Hirschhorn (modern art), Freer and Sackler, and the Portrait Gallery (which isn't on The Mall.) There is also the National Gallery of Art which is on the Mall, but not part of the Smithsonian.
I went to a lot of museums when I was in DC last time. I think I hit eight in one day.
Karate Kid..dutifully titled: 'Untitled Karate Kid Remake' on IMDB. Starring none other than Will Smiths son Jaden.
http://www.variety.com/VR1117995614.html
The romantic in me doesn't make me want to look at Honus Wagner's plaque though.
363 What qualifies as a "museum visit?"
I agree with this completely. Actually the tour of the outside and description of how the Getty was built was the most enjoyable for me.
Offers for CC Sabathia and Mark Teixeira seem unlikely, but Sabean refuses to rule them out. However, Sabean also says: "We're not out there swimming with the sharks. There are too many teams with more seemingly to offer financially than where we're at right now."
(He also seemed to dispute the Sanchez for Santu rumor tho not specifically.)
What's that? It's basketball? Never mind.
http://tinyurl.com/54wbr8
I forgot that Hillary Swank starred in the other remake.
I will not be going to see the new one
At least until the Abstracts started coming out.
And I didn't really read the "Baseball Encyclopedia."
http://tinyurl.com/67f4cb
Walked in, looked around, saw stuff, picked up a flyer.
http://tinyurl.com/5btlky
377
I won't shed a tear.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/news/story?id=3745431
It's not even in the Top 5.
And I'm going to be hearing "Tribute to Troy" approximately 35 times Saturday and "Fight On" about 37 times.
Let's just say I'm not going to "Bear Down" for anyone.
I'm looking forward to an In N Out Burger when I come home to LA in a couple of weeks... first time since January 1st! The glory of In N Out did fade when I developed my dairy allergy, though.
Joe Sheehan: Not defensively. He's the real deal. Offensively...the power we thought was there probably isn't, and I think you're now looking at a .270/.320/.350 guy. That can play, I think, with his glove, but he has to bat eighth and his down years will be really down.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=553
http://blogs.dailynews.com/dodgers/2008/12/dodgers-are-not.html
He did have a post earlier linking to a story from the Pittsburgh AP writer about the Wilson interest. Sounds like TH did some more digging.
I don't mean to bash Scorscese but Goodfellas, while being very good, wasn't even the best gangster movie of that year. Give me Miller's Crossing.
Hey, Juan Pierre's still on the roster.
http://blogs.dailynews.com/dodgers/
I kid, I kid.
Thank you for mentioning the Coens' most underrated film.
Gabriel Byrne was awesome in that...
I see Kemp in the leadoff next season with Hu at short...and about an $85 million payroll.
Cue Greg Brock and his love for "The Hudsucker Proxy" in 3... 2...
Wow.
http://www.rotoworld.com/
Perhaps my favorite thing about Logan White is how he's kept so many great talents away from the scummier schools in the Big 12. He stole Matt Kemp away from Oklahoma, James Loney away from Baylor, Scott Elbert away from Missouri, and Clayton Kershaw away from Texas A&M.
So I wasn't the only one to think it was mah...
A friend loaned me "The Hammer" is that any good?
Oh man...
I felt that way. I appreciated the acting, but I definitely felt that way too.
I am unsure of the statistical studies on this, but isn't a team better served when they have at least a little speed at the top of the lineup...or at least a savvy baserunner who can go from 1st to 3rd regularly.
Besides, you only lead off once, and in the later innings, a PH is usually hitting in front of the lead off hitter.
Hilarious - and the first real good laugh I've had in a while.
Now The Hebrew Hammer, there was a movie! Perfect for the holiday season.
DeJesus SS
Ethier RF
Martin C
Loney 1B
Kemp CF
Lambo LF
DeWitt 3B
Hu 2B
I thought he meant switch defensive positions.
2K4: Giambi
2K5: Jeter
2K6: Jeter
2K7: Jeter
2K8: Reyes
You be the judge.
I like it...but would swap Ethier/Kemp. 5 spot has been very comfy for Dre (.337/.413/125Ops+)..
I guess you wouldn't be interested in the map exhibition in the art gallery at the Central Library.
We're planning to swing by the Louvre, Orangerie, Orsay, Rodin, Picasso, and Pompidou next week when we visit Paris. It'll be my first time in Europe.
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/1182603.html
Orsay seems to be the consensus #1. I tend to get fatigued pretty quickly in museums, so we'll have to see how it goes.
On remake thoughts: plays are re-staged all the time so I don't see any reason why there should be a blanket reason against attempting film remakes, though I agree one should bring something new to the screen for a remake.
I guess being tied 2-2 after taking 5 penalties in the first two periods isn't so bad.
I think that means playing a quarter of the minutes short handed (less time you had an advantage yourself, I guess).
Oh wait, there's number 6 with 10 seconds left in the period . . .
438 If they could at least knock Rivers on his backside a few times tonight, that will make me happy at least.
Speaking of being knocked on one's backside, have to get ready for nighttime soccer.
You are going to freeze.
But I don't think the restaging of plays adds that much because, obviously, with a play, you sort of need to restage it. I can't just blink and be there to see James Earl Jones in Fences.
But the Twelve Angry Men film with Henry Fonda was pretty special. Since I can just watch that, seems like you ought to have a reason to remake more than, "I can do that too."
Somehow I don't see CNN Intl running on their scroll what team K-Rod signs with.
But I could be wrong.
Gangs of New York is one of the 5 worst movies I've ever seen, IMO.
http://www.beyondtheboxscore.com/
I was in Florida when Depo was fired, and in Oregon when Pierre was signed. Maybe I'll get to celebrate a John Garland acquisition in the City of Lights.
Signed: LHP Joe Torres
The Rangers should have Torres legally change his name to Torre.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/blog/prospects/?p=1816
Don't know what the definition of "slimy" is, but Scott Drew could never be described as slimy. Don't know much about Art Briles, but he doesn't give that vibe either.
Daniel Day Lewis alone makes that movie one of Scorcese's best. He's the one actor who can carry almost any movie.
But I think "Gangs" is pretty great aside from that. I'd put it behind only GoodFellas, Raging Bull, Taxi Driver, Mean Streets and Casino.
McFadden got hurt too? :)
I'm torn about whom I would rank higher: Daniel Plainview or Bill "The Butcher" Cutting.
Certainly not Russell.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2008/12/starks-latest-b.html
- Stark says that the Dodgers are only going to make an offer to C.C. if C.C. tells the Dodgers if he wants to play in L.A.
- The Furcal market has dried up, and only the A's and the Dodgers are effectively in it.
- Blake has to wait on Furcal signing before his situation is handled. If the Dodgers miss out both on Blake and Furcal, the Dodgers will focus on trading for either Beltre, or Ty Winnington.
-Andruw Jones might start playing winter ball this weekend.
-
Sarkisian has accepted the Washington job.
Hmmm...hadn't thought of that. We'll be visiting Notre Dame, of course, but hadn't heard anything about boat rides. It's gonna be chilly out, so we'll play that one by ear.
Regarding Ty Wigginton:
Home: .343/.390/.691/1.081
Away: .234/.316/.380/.696
Do you actually believe that the Dodgers will only make an offer on CC if he says he wants to play in LA! There are many things that are said during the Hot Stove League but that has to rank pretty high on the stupid list-it just doesn't make sense.
Sounds like a Chance? card in Monopoly - Paris edition.
We better box out on the last shot of the game then.
A:Kary Booher: Man, this is a tough crowd today. Accusations of no love for the Dodgers or the Brewers' Lorenzo Cain already. Fun stuff. In speaking with a number of scouts, no one singled out Lambo, so I took that as a sign that he was in that after-20 pack of a really good, not great guys. But DeJesus did get consideration for the back half of the list, falling out because he didn't hit enough and did commit nine errors, one that saw on a routine play in which he lolly-gagged scooped it and then threw the ball into the dugout. Scouts liked his range and think he'll be in the majors. I docked him a little for that and, with Eric Young Jr. surging at the end, I left No. 20 open for the taking. So Young snagged it.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/prospects/winter-baseball/arizona-fall-league/2008/267288.html
Brown sees that the Dodgers aren't really interested in Jack Wilson.
UCLA will probably win the rest of their games this month but their next test will be whoever they play first on the road in conference play.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-uschoops5-2008dec05,0,2636309.story
We did better than expected facing a top team on the road.
Yeah, right.
No one liked Age of Innocence?
According to ESPN sources.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=3746240
Also, Young can't throw until Jan. Despite being told after surgery that he could start around this time before.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
FYI - Sark is denying he has accepted, likely b/c our season isn't over. I'd expect a comment from him on Sunday.
Also, Leonard Washington is a dirty, dirty player and if Tim Floyd had a soul he would be ashamed of himself for giving him a scholarship.
I don't mind that play in general, but I agree Sark perhaps runs it too often.
Another criticism of Sark -- and I'm not sure how valid this is -- is that he runs too many plays to the short side of the field. Intuitively, the criticism seems apt but if the blocking is there I don't think it is necessarily a bad call.
It has seemed in the past few years the offense has struggled to find an identity. Perhaps part of the lack of rhythm is the RB rotation, but on the surface it seems like the offense should be doing more, even averaging 38 pts/game this year.
I want to go on record that, that, yeah, it may well have been the cheapest shot I've ever seen on national TV, but it ain't nothing' compared to what I've seen actually playing the game. And, yeah, it made me howl in pain along with the rest of the country. And, yeah, Leonard Washington is not the first guy I would have wanted to recruit if I had better options. And, yeah, of course, he had to be ejected. So what?
With all that said, and in the certain knowledge that there was no possible justification for what happened and I can in no way condone what he did...
I am, in fact, a 3rd generation fan, and I remember the stall game, and I remember Ron Taylor. And I remember 1972.
So I got to admit: if it's me there on the floor, I give the guy high five.
It was cool. It was disturbing, horrifying. Awful. Frightful. Indefensible. But still, cool.
In 50 years, will he be able to say he was glad he did it? Who knows? But, me, I'd've been proud to take the rap. This is, after all, sports we're all discussing, not politics or literature. This is not real life.
Tough spot, tough to defend. So, this one's mine. Go, Leonard!
New news?
You are defending deliberately hitting someone in the testicles during a basketball game?
Texas still has a lot of problems with their team. Connor Atchley has disappeared this year. Damion James thinks he's Glen Rice. Dexter Pittman can't stay on the floor for more than two minutes at a time. But they have a lot of things going for them, too. I heart Justin Mason.
This was my first time seeing Jrue Holiday play. I assume he's usually a lot better than that.
Let's delve into trashing each other's coaches.
He did threaten to kill his high school basketball coach.
If you look at the replay over and over there appears to be no contact at all below the waist. I think Griffin was just trying to draw attention to the play and make sure the refs reviewed the tape at the monitors.
That doesn't mitigate what Washington did at all, though. It was a really blatant cheap shot, and he deserves whatever he's got coming.
FWIW, I thought the intentional foul on Hackett was bogus. He was clearly going for the ball.
If you ain't seen worse you never played.
But, no, I'm defending the program. And the sport.
There are those who would take it all away from us. On the grounds that the game is played by men, and they should act like they're something else. My contention is that we can't; we shouldn't; we must resist.
510 - kid obviously has maturity issues, we knew that going in. Totally not disputing that.
Not going to be men if you get your sack ripped off.
Replay is on that post. Looks pretty blatant on that last angle.
http://tinyurl.com/5p9rz3
Ripped off would be an entirely different movie. What I'm saying is, we were doing that in the 8th grade. Without the cameras.
453 and 509 cracked me up.
Then there was a play where Damion James rebounded the free throw and was gang-tackled by three UCLA guys resulting in a held ball.
I thought the game was actually very well officiated up until then. They were really letting 'em play in the first half, which is the way it should be. It would have been really embarrassing for college basketball if those two late calls had decided the game, but fortunately, they didn't.
I think the referees noticed too and began to call more fouls. UCLA seemed to suffer from this early in the second half when they had their run. They came out hot and I felt like the increased activity by the refs helped Texas gather themselves. The calls at the end of the game were pretty bad too though. All in all, I think the officiating was pretty good. This early in the year, it would be a shame for players to get injured on two teams of Texas' and UCLA's caliber.
Not that I've ever defended John Chaney, but, Eric, you got to admit that a coach didn't tell his players to hang all over Griffin, he ought to be sued for defamation of character.
I'm defending Leonard Washington on different grounds: that the world, especially inside the lines, can't be made from foam rubber.
That's not the cosmos I want to leave to my children,
I thought both LA teams had a good showing in losses. Once UCLA's freshmen get more assertive, they will be a strong team. I was impressed, this was a game they'd win in 3 months.
USC was a bit of fools gold tonight, IMO. We typically won't shoot that well from the outside, and Hackett will never play that well again in a PG role. If those weren't flukes, then we will be pretty good. Derozan, although not really effective, at least got aggressive.
The Jack Wilson talks won't die. Now Wilson say's he's willing to restructure his contract to get traded to the Dodgers. (two years, 12 million.) Also, Dejan Kovacevic pretty much calls Tony Jackson misinformed.
Would players' union even allow that?
They would because it actually increases the guaranteed money. That 2010 option has buyout written all over it, and the players' association probably realizes it.
Okay, I've played, I've read what you've written, I've considered the sentiments you've expressed. It all sounds fine on paper.
What I'm wondering now, though, is if you've just written words, or if you've given any thought to the meaning behind them.
I've said here I don't like it and I don't condone it.
Now I'm asking if it really is beyond the pale; is it unacceptable; is it criminal; is it worthy of our contempt?
Or is it merely what we've all done, imagined doing, wished we'd done, regretted doing or not doing after the fact?
All too easy to say there is no place in real life for what does, in fact, happen all the time.
Go ahead, cast the first stone.
Jack Wilson isn't very good.
Signed,
A concerned fan
Chin-Lung Hu can give you similar production at 1/14th of the cost. You understand that right?
Tripon
540 LOL
>> But the hope of an overture from the Angels, apparently, explains Sabathia's delay. <<
http://tinyurl.com/59vjvo
I'm gett'in prepared for the money reality.
Hope I'm wrong.
Lets just say that Leonard has quite a reputation on the AAu circuit.
Where would Jack Wilson fit in the big pile of regrettable Colletti acquisitions? Not as bad as Pierre, I'd say. Worse than Jones or Schmidt (though I could see taking the other side of that). Really the central question would be his position relative to Gary Bennett.
ESPN did a full Baseball Tonight and for what it is worth Jack Wilson will not be a Dodger and Kurjian thinks Furcal ends up an A and Manny does sign with the Dodgers. I wonder what the annual salary the A's have offered Furcal. Part of me says they have given him four years but the dollar amount maybe far closer to 10million per year instead of the 12 or 13 that people have been talking about.
http://insider.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3746876&name=olney_buster
The implication is that Cano is an elite player, is he? I might do a Pedroida for Kershaw move as a base of something but Cano for Kershaw no way.
Good trade for Depo's squad.
The Yankees wouldn't be trading Cano in the first place if they valued him anywhere near as much as the Dodgers value Billingsley/Kershaw/Kemp. Ned's not that stupid, and even if he was, someone in the organization would stop him from making such a huge mistake.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
http://www.faniq.com/blog/The-25-Best-Rickey-Henderson-Stories-Of-All-Time-Blog-15243
All these rumors dont amount to anything really. Just writers trying to get hits on their articles.
I remember when Hudson for Perez/Jackson was supposedly a done deal & it never happened.
Does "restructure his contract" mean "play for less money"...?
and the market for these properties just might go down some more - and the market for properties like this might not come back up for maybe ten years. Oh ... and I borrowed money to buy the homes ... I didn't pay cash.
If I were in a situation like this, what advice might you offer me? What should I do?
Add on oh! Forgot to mention that the majority of my collateral for my big business dealings have been real estate holdings.
I love all of those, and I don't care if they're true or not.
C-Martin
CF-Kemp
RF-Ethier
LF-Manny
1B-Loney
3B-Blake
2B-DeWitt
SS-Wilson
Would this be a good offense?
Cano has great offensive numbers (for a second baseman) when he works with Mattingly and Torre.
He will be 26 this October.
But he's a second baseman and second baseman are a dime a dozen.
Cano hits 15 homers or DeWitt hits 11 - what's the diff?
What's his contract status?
How much money would McCourt need to spend in order to keep Cano around for four more years?
The pitchers who you are mentioning are young, cheap, under control and look like they might be seviceable at the MLB level.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Which, I suppose, is good news for those who want to keep Manny for one year.
First-he is expensive
09:$6M, 10:$9M, 11:$10M, 12:$14M club option ($2M buyout), 13:$15M club option ($2M buyout)
I think we have to assume that this team has a budget. Money spent on Cano is money not spent elsewhere. Is this really where we want to spend this kind money? I don't.
Second-He's a good hitter but not that good. His OPS+ last year was only 86; his career is 109. Why did it drop 34 points last year? Maybe the Yankees are having Buyers remorse?
Third-He is not a FA. We have to give up players to get him.
If he was a FA and we had unlimited money I would love to have him at 2B. Since neither of those are true I think we should pass.
ha ha ha ha... errrrr that's not funny, darn it.
Remember that time you killed your ex-wife and her boyfriend? That was illegal, too.
I know, I know: those law-thingies are tough to keep track of.
And his 4% walk rate is 11th worst in the majors.
I love the comments Yankees fans are making defending Robinson Cano. Its awesome and hilarious at the same time.
Amazing.
Unlike established superstars Phil Hughes and Ian Kennedy. :)
15 years for OJ with the possibility of parole in 5..
That's their punishment for not just using the original sidekick actor from the Police Squad show instead of bringing in OJ.
It's hard to watch those Naked Gun movies nowadays without feeling creeped out
Yeah, because of Priscilla Presley.
Another 'confused' blogger compared Cano to Ryan Howard, and Bills/Kershaw to Price/Shields (ok, that one is at least close)..
Ya, I can just imagine OJ in 5 years..
"Rehabilitated? Well, now let me see. You know, I don't have any idea what that means".
"I thought I was confronting friends."
I saw that. I mean, who doesn't bring an arsenal of firearms with them when confronting friends...?
If I had to rank them right now on production:
Billingsley
Shields
Price
Kershaw
Price is higher due to production in the playoffs.
If I had to guess 3, 4 years from now:
Price
Kershaw
Billingsley
Shields
I personally think Kershaw's going to win a Cy Young before Billingsley will, and when Kershaw's hits the FA market(if the Dodgers are foolish enough to let that happen.) He'll match C.C. next contract.
Wow, that's a lot of hyperbole for an age 21 pitcher.
As Rob Neyer (and maybe Bill James before him) likes to say, it's foolish to predict anything for a 21- (or 20-)year old pitcher. You'd be right more often than not in predicting Kershaw won't even get to 50 wins.
Not that I'm that pessimistic, though.
I'll even admit my homer-ism..they are very comparable, but Shields is 3 years older than Bills, and I can't imagine Bills not being better at 27 than Shields now. Kershaw has more upside than Price too..
Scratch that, should have read "I can't imagine Bills not being MUCH better at 27 than Shields now."
Good point. Since integration, there have been only 34 pitchers age 20 or younger to achieve a 100 ERA+ in 100 IP.
Only 6 of the 32 (not counting active pitchers Kershaw & Greinke) didn't get to 50 career wins.
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/unwY
I'm hoping for maybe a Clemens-like average of around 143 :)
-------------
http://tinyurl.com/67wy9x
"Hu, in fact, has been mentioned as part of a package that would go to Pittsburgh for Wilson. Backup outfielder Delwyn Young is also on the table. Colletti might part with both of them provided the Pirates picked up most of the guaranteed money still owed Wilson ($7.85 million)."
Jay Jaffe: I think Buster is just spitballing on a slow day, but there is quite obviously a source within the Dodger org that insists on fueling such rumors every so often as an effort to undermine Colletti and to put murder in the hearts of Dodger fans like me.
I have my ideas as to who that source is, but I can't discuss them here.
Woooooooooooooo, I got quoted!
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=550
Jay Jaffe: No, because they predate his arrival.
$50 million mortgages don't pay themselves...
Especially when you consider that being much older would mean he was pitching professionally in Mexico at, what, age 55?
The Dodgers have turned into the Departed.
"The rat symbolizes obviousness."
I've been meaning to ask you this for a while: do you pronounce your screen name like "trip on," as in to fall over something, or somewhat sounding like "tripod"?
Either way, Fernando is legendary on one or perhaps both ends of the age spectrum.
Tripon is an actual last name though, to my surprise. Romanian I believe. Not my actual last name, but somebody's.
Lincecum was at the Husky-OK State basketball game last night to be honored. As a Cy Young Award member he had garnered the highest honor of ANY UW alum in the big three sports. Ever.
And he looked like he should have been jumping up and down and yelling Defense in the student section. Amazing story.
And his Dad is still pissed the Mariners didn't pick him when they could of.
Now who am I still missing on the 3000 strikeout club Sporcle? He finished with 3,342 of them and got #3,000 in 1984...hmm...
Jay Jaffe: Much more reasonable, yes.
In an IM last night, Kevin called Russell "The Texas Wind Machine" which had me falling out of my chair laughing.
I like Jay Jaffe. Especially since he seems like "one of us."
--
I don't know if it's fair to compare Price and Kershaw at this point since, well, they're not at the same point. Kershaw is 20, Price is older with more high level (college + pro) experience. Who knows where Kershaw will be in a few years. But yes, I'd be pretty happy if he ended up Price.
>>A friend of C.C. Sabathia tells Heyman the pitcher received two offers from unknown teams prior to Thanksgiving, in addition to the ones from the Brewers and Yankees. Sabathia is taking his time with this, as he should.<<
Doubtful it's the Dodgers, but you never know.
Of course, none taken...I think if Price is able to polish up his changeup delivery and keep his velocity through his career then he will probably end up better than Kershaw. But just from the small spattering of Sept/Oct I've seen of Price (and a little from Vandy), I like the overall look of Kershaws stuff more. Much more aesthetically pleasing delivery to me..
Did I mention I'm a lefty?
It's neither here nor there, but I wonder if his chances of keeping his Dodger job would have increased if he had had such a blog back then...
As a Cy Young Award member he had garnered the highest honor of ANY UW alum in the big three sports. Ever.
Warren Moon is in the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Although that's technically not an award. He did win the 1990 AP Offensive Player of the Year, though.
Dodgers have needs entering Meetings
>> Ideally, the Dodgers would like to add an ace, they just don't want to pay for one. <<
http://tinyurl.com/62vf3u
I have to think that money is also the primary reason the Dodgers appear to have no interest in Randy Johnson.
Yet, the A's are supposedly the favorites to land him.
I was just parroting what the public address announcer said when they introduced Lincecum to the BofA Arena at HecEdmunson Pavillion crowd. I figured there must be somebody at least in the conversation and Moon does seem the most obvious.
I just sometimes fail to appreciate that not all schools have a fraction of the history of UCLA and USC for which I am most familiar with.
I am having fun mentioning to Husky fans that Sark is responsible for USC not having 5 BCS titles by now.
The As don't have $47ish million a year tied up in Schmidt, Jones, Pierre, and Torre.
5008 innings
999 walks
He's just scared of going over a thousand. :)
They do have Chavez and Crosby eating $16 million, with a much lower payroll.
That would have been cool. You think the McCourts would have allowed it though?
Brian Dohn, who covers UCLA for the LA Daily News said in his weekly Q&A (which really is a great feature that he does for his blog) that the law firm was a better QB than Kevin Craft and in his opinion would have started this year.
That is a very depressing thought if you saw the law firm play against Notre Dame in the Rose Bowl last year.
Vs. LHB- 911 PA's, 115 BB, 158 K's, .778 OPS against.
Vs. RHB- 974 PA's, 87 BB, 243 K's, .645 OPS against.
The only silver lining is he's only givin up 10 HR's vs LHB, compared to the 26 vs RHB.
Old friend Greg Maddux is supposedly about to announce retirement, too.
That's it for the moment in Old Friend news.
From Depo:
I've turned down multiple opportunities in the past two years for higher profile positions elsewhere in this industry, and I recently signed an agreement to stay here for the "San Diego discount". My wife's family has lived here for decades, and we're very much a part of the community.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.