Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Vin Scully watched the 1956 Don Larsen World Series perfect game that he co-broadcasted with Mel Allen, and offered his thoughts to Diane Pucin of the Times:
"Another thing, in those days, radio and television wasn't a cottage industry. Now everybody has a television set, don't they? The approach in those days was, we were always told to be quiet, don't talk. Ball one, strike one, fouled back, don't say much else. Today under those circumstances, we'd be talking up the drama, the tension, telling people who Don Larsen is, what he does. We were somewhat intimidated by talking in those days." ...
--Wow, now it's fear of silence expressed with hyperkinetic verbosity. And still not saying anything of substance.
/rant
"Torre and his coaching staff wanted Lowe back but that sentiment wasn't shared by owners Frank and Jamie McCourt, with whom the pitcher had personality conflicts."
There's more in the bottom half (or should I say "last half", as I've been fascinated to hear all the old broadcasts on MLB.com, right up to one in 1991, refer to the bottom half of innings) of a current Times article by Dylan Hernandez.
The McCourts didn't seem to get along well with any of the players Depo brought in.
On a related note, I don't think "personality" was high on his priority list.
On another related note, I tend to think the McCourt's hired Ned at least in part because they thought he'd care more about such things.
---
Seems odd that personality conflicts with an owner would be more important than how one gets along with the manager, with whom they interact with on an every day basis. But whatever. Better to cut ties a year early than too late.
I assume this varies by owner, some of whom probably don't care about player personalities.
The McCourts care about personality. And the children.
they liked jeff kent
Again, sorry,normally I resist the urge to rant, BUT I find I'm ENDURING current baseball telecasts-esp WS fare-as opposed to the telecasts as I'd grown accustomed to enjoying since childhood w/ my grandfather.Seeing the perfect game recently just brought that to the fore.
Oh, and thanks for this site, love peeking in here for the humor and perspective even though I'm not a stats guy.
http://www.minorleaguebaseball.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20090113&content_id=495199&vkey=news_milb&fext=.jsp
I wasn't commenting on that issue either way.
Excellent post.
It reminds me of how I have a Pollyanna vision of how the locker room works. I see it through the eyes of a little league boy that loves baseball all too often, and I seem to forget that 25 grown men that are competing for playing time and long term salaries can make for an interesting locker room situation. I wonder what it is really like in there.
http://www.sltrib.com/ci_11450860
This might explain the trash can incident.
I now await the inevitable lightning strike.
I can understand where you are coming from on the stories, but I guess his voice is much more soothing than others that I don't let it get to me. I always am comforted to know he won't be spouting off nonsense like Joe Morgan.
You can be a critic all you want, but I find the idea that anyone who likes Vin as much as most of us do only does so by 'sentimental reasons.' I was probably 15 when I first connected who was calling his game, so I find this interjection impossible for me.
I think most of us just takes Vin for what he is: still probably the very best at what he does, an act so born to knots and warts that we do not expect holistic perfection.
I would like the record to show that I was there, and I did not boo Chad off the field. I cheered him on.
If true, that is a cool and rare instance of my favorite NFL team helping my favorite college team. :)
I was not a good person to be around, to say the least.
I really like Kuiper and Krukow.
Also, I don't get to hear them as much, but the Astros TV duo (Bill Brown and Jim Deshaies) are excellent. They have good chemistry, a good sense of humor, and are generally informative. Also, they are open to new stats and often the production team shows OBP in their graphics. Even better, if a "new" stat is shown, the duo will explain it to the audience.
What does everyone think about this alternate reality:
Late September, 2009 -- Manny swings the Dodgers into the playoffs, the wigs are selling like hotcakes, "Manny! Manny! Manny!" chants are causing fans to forget their timing on the wave. Boras -- God forbid -- decides to try something that goes completely against his orthodoxy -- he calls up Ned and Frank and tells them that Manny is very happy in L.A. and would like to discuss a contract extension before he reaches free agency.
Do Ned/the McCourts jump on the offer, and if so, how much are we on the hook now for Manny?
With the market depressed, it seems like Manny and his agent could have made a lot more money discussing an extension during the height of Manny-mania. It would have given the illusion that Manny thought L.A. was right for him and maybe we were getting some kind of a "hometown" "discount".
Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but sometimes it seems like Boras takes these stances for the benefit of his entire body of clients and the detriment of one or the other. It's like the amateur draft prospects he advises: does it make a ton of sense for them individually to bypass a couple hundred thousand dollars to go back to school, play another season, weigh injury on one hand, a slightly larger payday on the other.
Maybe it does makes sense for some of them, but it sure does a lot more good for Boras, letting the teams know he's willing to pull stunts like this in the future.
That's a weird article by Olney. He acknowledges Peavy is better and younger than Lowe, and notes that Lowe will cost more than Peavy over the next 4 seasons. But he completely glosses over the cost of the players in a deal to get Peavy.
I'd rather have Escobar than O.Cabrera at SS, as Olney suggested, even if the cost was the same.
Just Broxton, Kuo and Repko
I can't help it. I liked both as a kid, and it takes a lot to change those childhood bonds. I have no doubt though that if I went to a college with D-1 sports (unlike UCSD) I would have broken up with USC.
And if the Raiders would have drafted Brady Quinn in 2006 I would have left. Other than that, I'm stuck with them.
I've been meaning to stab more people, if that helps. :)
Game 5 was surreal for me. I believe Chad gave up a leadoff home run. I just tried to enjoy the game, but the excitement was sucked out of that stadium early on, and it did not feel like a playoff game at all.
I've long thought that Colletti was doing everything he could to dump DePo players. I can't remember a single report of him even trying to re-sign one whose contract was up. Oh wait - Jeff Kent would be the exception.
Yeah, it would. Get right on that, please.
Repko still has an option year left, so he'll most likely earn his $500-600k or whatever while in Albuquerque. (Unless Pierre is traded of course)
"Now stand back, I gotta practice my stabbing."
35 So Mays was told he'd be pick #7 in the 2010 draft then? or 09? If this year then why would he go back? I can't imagine he'll be higher than that next year. If they meant next year, then there's the risk he'd get injured or have a poorer season, in which case making a statement like that seems kind of off. Ah well, I'm always in favor of players staying in school. Presuming they're getting an education though, of course. ;-)
Who are the other top safeties out there in this draft?
Broxton*
Repko*
Kuo*
Martin
Young
Loney
Miller
Only the first 3 saw major league action in 2005. All were drafted or signed as an amateur (Kuo) by the Dodgers.
Bradley/Perez (another Depo player) netted Ethier and HSC isn't in the major leagues.
I don't think it mattered if Colletti was GM or not on any of those 3 players:
1) Bradley was a PR nightmare, which of course is the McCourts' biggest fear. His throwing the bottle at the feet of a fan may have been overblown, but from a PR standpoint it was a killer. There were also allegations of domestic violence, which made him poison to the McCourts. Any GM would have had to get rid of him at their behest
2) The misuse of Choi was well-documented but I don't think it was anything personal that ousted him. Colletti didn't do anything 25 or so other GMs wouldn't have done. Factor in the fact that Choi hasn't seen an MLB plate appearance since 2005 and it's hard to see how this was personal
3) The Hochevar thing was bizarre, with switching agents and backing out of deals. The Dodgers simply refused to budge from their $2.98m offer (which Hochevar accepted) on a matter of principle. Logan White was heavily involved in this. I doubt it was anything personal in regards to DePo.
Boras wouldn't come right out and say it, but it would be strongly implied that if Ned got it wrong Manny would be heading north.
Milton had already survived the bottle throwing incident. That occurred in the heat of a pennant race in 2004. His undoing was crying to the press after the Kent incident when it was requested by both Tracy and Depo to keep it in house.
Tracy was Milton's biggest backer in the organization, I had to listen to him rant for 20 minutes in the spring of 2005 about how Milton was just misunderstood.
61
Blaming Ned for getting rid of Milton because he was a Depo player is just an inaccurate portrayal of what happened. No matter who the GM was his 1st order of business in the fall of 2005 was going to be unloading Milton. History can't be rewritten unless you have deal with a publisher.
History can't be rewritten unless you have deal with a publisher
That has to be your new tagline. :)
Well, I didn't necessarily mean players that DePodesta had acquired - just the guys who were there when he departed. Other than Broxton and Kuo, it looks like 23 of the 25 players on the squad never played under DePodesta. Sure, quite a few came up from the minors, and it was Colletti's good luck to be in charge when they were ready, but he has traded away or let walk every other player he inherited.
I'm not even criticizing here (though I could and have in the past). I'm just noting that that's a lot of turnover in a short time. Let's hope the core young talent is allowed to stick around (and is good enough to merit it) so that fans can grow attached to them a little. I too am nervous that not one has signed a long-term deal buying out arbitration years. Not panicked, but concerned.
The best decision Ned may have made was pulling the plug on the Hochevar fiasco. It he didn't we wouldn't have Kershaw and we'd be stuck with a very average pitcher who cost a boatload of money.
Depo was our GM during our worse draft under Logan White. Since moving to San Diego, their drafts have been very light but we don't know how much weight he even carries in the SD drafts.
http://dodgers.scout.com/2/830031.html
Probably only the influence. The only time Logan White has ever drafted a college pitcher with his first pick was under Depo. The scouting director works for the GM, not the other way around.
-Hefe, Manchester, N.H.
SG: Short of chicken blood squirting from the Green Monster, yes, I'd say it's about as bad an omen as you can have.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3829660
That should have been comment #6.
"McGoohan spent some time working for Disney on The Three Lives of Thomasina and The Scarecrow of Romney Marsh. "
As a kid the three lives of Thomasina made we want a cat for a pet ( my population varies from 6-10) and the Scarecrow made me want to be a terrorist for good. Back in those days the Disney station would air the Scarecrow as a three parter. At least that is how I remember it. I loved that series. I wonder if I'd still like it, I hadn't thought about it in over 35 years.
:logs off until 11:51 AM PST tomorrow ...
This is the only possible reason I can really accept for why Brian Sabean has kept his job.
As for Hochevar, I thought it was pretty well established that DePodesta was the one who made White draft him in 2005, over White's objections. After DePo was removed from the picture, the Dodgers kept their offer out to Hochevar, but they certainly didn't break their necks making sure he signed.
Starring Spencer Tracy?
But, yeah, had the same sorta feeling.
But then I'm kinda grumpy since today's been kind of bad anyway and now I've misplaced my cell phone somewhere in the midst of all the craziness. :-( Sigh.
{goes back to hide under covers til Friday}
I feel for ya, underdog, but I'm consumed with apathy.
87 - Ultimately, it comes down to how an organization is run. The Raiders and Lions have been terrible because their front offices are a mess. Same could have been said for many years about the Rams, Cardinals, Bengals, and Browns. One could make that argument about the 49ers now. The teams that are well run (Steelers, Colts, Patriots, Cowboys, Giants, arguably the Eagles) tend to make the playoffs most years.
Dangit. Dungy, and now this.
I wonder if acting schools use the "Star Trek II, The Wraith of Khan" as an example of how not to act. Though after the first Star Trek movie, it along with Star Trek IV, are the best of the ST movies.
The future can only be saved by whales!
That and Transparent Aluminum.
The only one with the original cast that wasn't horrendous in my opinion was Wrath of Khan. And that's a low threshold. If you made me watch a different one I'd pick Search for Spock, but I might bite my own tongue and pass out instead.
He said that his job in directing that film was to control two actors who were both singing arias.
KHAN!!!!!!!
Sometimes you have to overact and he did it extremely well in Wrath of Khan. Would it have been the best of the series if he hadn't dominated it?
Kirk Douglas to my surprise has outlasted so many. With his son being married to Zeta-Jones he may outlast him as well.
Now they sold the block to 4kids, who somehow survived, despite making horrible shows.
One of the debates you don't have much anymore is the ones between fans of the original series and fans of Star Trek TNG (I'll leave out the 3 series that came after that for now)
But with the movie coming out this year (I guess its a prequel of the first series), I am sure it will raise itself again.
http://tinyurl.com/a8unhg
There is still the 10-year waiting limit. And that's a bigger problem.
Not that I want my brother to vote on the Hall of Fame. I only trust him with one upstate New York sports hall of fame and that's in Oneonta.
Does anyone use an online only checking account?
The demise of papers may make this happen sooner then later. Wouldn't you expect that as some of the old guard get transitioned from newspaper to web they will still want to vote but would not be able to under the current rules.
Would not surprise me in the least to see Jon Weisman HOF voter having to defend his reason for voting for Pedro Guerrero as a write in.
129 - Think about it: There would be three Pedros on my first ballot!
Shatner and Jarvis need to make an album together. It's destiny.
Do you find it hard to deposit cash?
Oh well.
And those mind-control cockroach things that go in the ear.
I expect that both could hold their own in any baseball knowledge test. Expanding the voting can only be a good thing. The voting would be preceded by a month long debate on the merits of all the candidates hosted by the MLB Network. The debates would have a series of three pro/con debates. For those who cannot find anyone debating on their behalf no time would be wasted. MLB.Network has a future even if no one in South Pasadena can see it.
What would be the fairest and most useful trade of a UCLA basketball player for a USC football player?
I figure a USC quarterback would be involved.
I always wondered who would win out if the star trek mind control bug ran into the Babel Fish from Hitchhikers guide. They both entered via the ear, so the pathways were the same. For all we know the Babel Fish had some deep fish type of teeth. But now I'm babbling.
Off the wall question but I will bite.
I would rather send Kevin Craft for Taj Gibson but I guess it would have to be Jerime Anderson (a prospect who can play right away for USC) for Mustain
Marques Johnson for Charles White?
I like to think UCLA quarterback and USC pt guard are similar in depth and quality at this point but Hacket is a good player just not a real pt.
Or he met him for the first time at DeMar DeRozan's press conference, either one.
Order a case of whatever he was drinking for Billingsley, McDonald and Stults. Not Kershaw though. Too young to imbibe.
We'll miss Lowe, no matter how good the youngsters turn out to be in '09.
I will just go with Jerime Anderson for OL Tyron Smith.
Not until March.
Is Marc Sanchez currently projected to be the first QB taken in the NFL draft?
I believe he is. Stafford is an underachiever.
Chris Moretensen is reporting Sanchez to turn pro tomorrow. On the bright side, Mort is often wrong.
Sanchez has better stats, including a very high completion percentage, which is the most important stat to judge quarterbacks entering a draft (according to a study I read). In favor of Stafford is that he has started more games, which is also important.
Actually, Sanchez grades as 95 on Scouts Inc, while Stafford grades at 94.
I'm not sure if I've seen a movie in the last ten years that made smile as much as Galaxy Quest. The dweeby but lovable kids still kill me everytime I see them. Maybe that is why I like BBT so much. If they would only drop the obnoxious laugh track I'd like it more. They are funny, they don't need to tell us how funny they are.
Yeah, quite the turn around. After the first two episodes, I was already wondering why she was still around.
I was looking on ESPN.com's draft page, with lists the Top 32 via Scout's Inc.
lol well this is weird, because I am looking at same thing.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/draft
I mixed up Bradford and Stafford! D'oh.
No way we were winning it next year
I refuse to believe that.
No way we were winning it next year
I refuse to believe that.
How many players should I keep?
Should I "black-out" the first 2 rounds of picks, making them ineligible for picking (we do this in football, which keeps the top players available from year-to-year)?
How do keepers slot in next years draft? I've read some leagues put a two-round penalty on keepers (your keeper drafted in the 10th round becomes your 8th round pick next year, and so on).
Thanks in advance...
Right now, I think our schedule is easier in even years.
I am in keeper league and we keep it far simpler than that. Certain number of keepers with limits on certain positions. Then draft from worst to first.
Successful tip: Make it an auction league instead of a draft.
Seeing as how USC needed Oregon State to lose on their last week of the season just to win the Pac-10 this year with Sanchez makes me think your confidence in winning the Pac-10 next year a bit premature. Oregon and Oregon State return basically everybody and should at least compete with USC next year (particularly with Sanchez gone.)
So if you want to make the case that Sanchez really is that good, you can't just look at the stats. This isn't baseball, after all.
4 in football and in baseball it is 8.
But most of the QBs from top programs play with tons of talent. Not just USC.
Sept. 5 San Jose State W, 64-7
Sept. 12 @ Ohio State W, 24-21
Sept. 19 @ Washington W, 48-3
Sept. 26 Washington State W, 34-6
Oct. 3 @ California W, 21-9
Oct. 10 Arizona W, 34-21
Oct. 17 @ Notre Dame W, 14-3
Oct. 24 Oregon State W, 27-21
Oct. 31 @ Oregon W, 17-13
Nov. 7 @ Arizona State W, 21-7
Nov. 14 Stanford W, 34-17
Nov. 28 UCLA L, 17-14
26.
Either way, next year is not the worst time to break in a new qb with all 5 OL starters back. All in all, still a good offseason, mainly b/c of the coaching staff changes, IMO.
I do not see what listing 4 players proves though. I am just saying that players should not be discounted, because they play with good players. Each player has to be judged independently.
Top Chef Thoghts. I haven't figured out who to pull for now that wiley regular guy Eugene is gone.
I'm more rooting against at the moment . . .
It seems like a while since they had a really constrained/gimmicky challenge -- they've had a lot of freedom the last few shows to buy and cook whatever they wanted.
I'm looking for a "make me souflee using a loaf of bread, a snickers bar, and an acetylne torch" type challenge.
Sanchez actually has a higher QB rating than Leinart did.
Pete Carroll. He convinces tons of players to do it.
186 - that seems like a pretty sweeping generalization. QB success in the NFL has to do with 1) your own physical tools and work ethics, and 2) the organization you go to. I think the college you went to is much further down the list.
But most of the QBs from top programs play with tons of talent. Not just USC.
True, and most disappoint in the pros. But the level of competition matters too. One thing that has struck me watching Pac-10 football, especially in the Carroll era, is the huge disparity in talent (and size and speed) between $C players and most players on most other Pac-10 teams. Of course, other teams get some serious talent, but not across the board, and sometimes the differences (especially on the lines) are just absurd. $C-Cal this year looked like men vs. boys in the trenches, just from size alone.
So if other top QBs are also on teams that dominate the talent pools in their conferences, you'd be right. That doesn't seem as clear to me.
And that has basically been proved so far in the NFL. He can make all the throws, but he stinks at going through progressions, locking onto receivers, and just general decision making.
I would be very surprised if UCLA came anywhere close to USC at the Coliseum this coming November.
Someone said that Leinart always had bad fundamentals, etc. But the point is that they didn't matter in college. He could be mediocre and enjoy ridiculous success. That's my point. It doesn't mean that Sanchez is necessarily the same - just that you can't know from the stats/wins.
Jamarcus Russell got benched at LSU during his career, so I am definitely going to blame him. He frankly is not a hard enough worker.
I think people are starting to realize that the UCLA turnaround will take a little while, most rebuilds do. He's won a couple recruiting battles this year, next year he'll win even more, and etc. Dorrell really left them in bad shape. I really think Rick will turn things around, and I hope he does. It's just gonna take a few years.
Matt Cassel
I am definitely pulling for Leah, which means she is probably screwed.
Wow. Just wow.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
I guess everyone should have bet on the over on that one.
I think Sanchez is much more like Palmer in that his physical tools are very strong. I think he is pretty accurate, I question his decision making, not accuracy. This is where I think he should have come back. I throw his stats out, shredding Big 10 teams and the Washington schools doesn't mean much to me.
I think the scouts just got caught up in his physical abilities. Plus, he improved his footwork a lot before the draft.
Never improved his brain though.
Who was the last stud $C WR to thrive in the NFL? Keyshawn had a good career, but as a possession guy. I admire that he was willing to play that role, but it wasn't what was expected out of college. Lynn Swann comes to mind. But there were a lot of busts too (and yes, I realize I'm talking about Tailback U.).
USC has too many big possession receivers. That is how they like a lot of their WRs. I think Williams could be their best WR prospect to come out in awhile.
I should add it obviously works fine in college.
Hey, Steve Smith caught a touchdown pass this year!
And Keary Colbert caught a TD pass also.
Try telling that to trainwreck and Greg Brock.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/
What am I missing?
This deal makes me think that Colletti is bad at his job.
Oh, I guess that wasn't news after all.
As you were.
Unless he thinks Mota is like Yoda?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mota
Oh, that must be it.
Almost.
I actually have seen every episode. And I am no stranger to either Mota. One of those things, I guess.
Got to keep on risin'...
LA Pitcher! Sunday afternoon
Drive thru your suburbs
Into your Blues, into your Blues, yeah.
I have not watched it since Season 2, but I have never heard that slang before. I usually go with doj or doja.
As you might now recall, Guillermo typically calls it mota.
Which, when you think about it, is pretty ironic.
Maybe the Irony Committee even thinks so...
Ah, very good.
Broxton as the closer
Wade as the 8th inning set up man
Kuo as the quasi-fireman
Cluadio Vargas a long relief type
Troncoso, another long relief type
Mota as potentially the 7th inning set up.
With Shawn Estes, Greg Miller, and Eric Stults fighting for the last bullpen spot.
Tigger yum yum was my favorite.
UCLA has more students.
And we're all slackers.
Cal students doubly so.
Bob Timmermann
UCLA '87, UC Berkeley '88
At some point that became slang more often for heroin. Like the term bought into a higher real-estate bracket, or something.
If Trailer Park Boys has an accuracy at all, they still use it in Canada. Canuck can possibly let us know.
In "Deadwood", heroin is called "dope."
That's about all Rule 1 will allow me to reference from that series.
We started watching "The L Word" maybe a month or so ago, and are now part way through season 5.
Overall, I would say it's not as good as Weeds, but it's entertaining and has its moments.
Suddenly, everything makes sense.
It would have cost the Dodgers about $3 million to keep Beimel. Even if you think Beimel couldn't produce near the level he did last year, he would still be a better bet than Mota would this year. The Dodgers lost on this one.
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/
I wonder which will be legalized first?
Not really a question.
You mean marijuana or same-sex marriage?
I was aiming for more of a subtle comment than that.
Per Hardball Times:
Beimel x-FIP
2006: 4.83
2007: 4.47
2008: 4.77
Mota x-FIP
2006: 5.73 (Cle) / 3.36 (NYM; "enhanced")
2007: 4.32
2008: 4.40
Wow, I need to get a new history degree.
You mean I'll be able to show baseball games in public without the expressed written consent of MLB?
You can always dream.
Would they actually respond?
MLB has an office that grants clearances. I'm betting that your request would receive a favorable response if you enclosed a check.
Gee, that sure similar to something else.
So while the Depression did not cause the repeal directly, it certainly set the stage for rapid changes, including the repeal.
PS: Hopefully this is not considered a Rule 5 violation. The two parties of 1918-1933 barely resemble those of today about which I have no opinion (here).
Joe Beimel and Takeshi Saito were very good from 2006-2008, could they make it 4 years in a row?
Right now, Mota fills the veteran cap in a pen full of kids. We'll see how he will be used as we get closer to the start of the season.
I was talking about how he used stem cells to try to fix his elbow.
http://tinyurl.com/8gcbz7
Interesting.
Maybe Ned hopes he is as good as Gary Bennett.
Sounds like Icaros is the one who is smoking something.
If everything makes sense,that just means the universe has been destroyed and replaced by something even more bizarrely inexplicable.
Diamond has the summary on his blog.
Direct MP3 download here: http://tinyurl.com/8rgz3w
Or go to the KLAC homepage and play from here: http://tinyurl.com/a57ygy
D'oh! I'm not sure of another non-Bruno interview.
Ned hasn't learned jack, at that price no way to spin this as an intelligent move. Just another mediocre move from mediocre man. Dodger fans will be so pleased to know they can count on Mota be give them a completely mediocre performance in the 7th inning for the same kind of performance I could pick from any number of unemployed relief pitchers. I kid you not.
Bleah
He is on my non money-league fantasy team, so he should be fine.
vr, Xei
I think I asked this before, but do you type "vr, Xei" every time or do you have a macro?
2005: $2.6
2006: $3.0
2007: $1.8
2008: $3.2
He scored the goal when a crossing pass in front of the net bounced off a defender's skate straight into the goal.
Has he gotten into a fight with Malkin yet?
I only pretend to be a hockey fan.
320 Hard hitting game, and Ovechkin's been flat on the ice quite a bit, but nothing between him and Malkin.
We should start hearing either contract announcements or salary arbitration figures for Martin, Broxton, Ethier, and Repko soon. Deadline is tomorrow to file for arbitration (not sure of the exact time).
Spurs 63, Lakers 61 @ halftime
FG%:
Lakers 63.4%
Spurs 58.1%
Since Time Warner added Bravo HD, I record the East Coast feed. The Laker game is preventing me from watching Top Chef right now though.
I have noticed that some pitchers who come back to the Dodgers do well, seeming to recapture some of their promise. Think Chan Ho Park, and a few others I can't recall. Oh Mota----be one more!
Eric lives in a magical world where Time Warner adds HD channels. In my Time Warner world, they just tell me my town is too small to worry about.
vr, Xei
Don't mess with the NFL's intellectual property. I know one guy who did and his body was only found after further review.
Drowned by contact?
If one of the uninspiring three starting pitchers (Garland, Wolf, Looper) is signed to a 3-year deal, or if we sign no more outfielders, that would be the equivalent of a 6-month sentence for William Zantzinger.
Thank you for an analogy that is understood by about five people.
I have no idea what you are talking about, but I agree. : )
I was going for that Dennis Miller ratio. It would have been understood by 6 people but one of them died almost two weeks ago.
Although I imagine that for the Lakers, an executive would be expected to do some schmoozing of clients and not entertaining his mother-in-law.
The Dennis Miller ratio also applies to the number of people who regularly read the Griddle.
The Griddle is the sole reason I understood 343 without a google search.
Just like hockey. Team point differential with that player on the court.
With the exception that in hockey, there is no +/- figured when teams are in power plays/shorthanded.
Not that many people care, but in 1970-71, Bobby Orr had a +/- of +124. Larry Robinson gave him a run in 1976/77 at +120.
vr, Xei
Kobe.
vr, Xei
Major League II.
"You have no marbles!!"
vr, Xei
I was referring to the Spurs getting snake bit on that 3 pointer and being able to bounce back and get a Win.
vr, Xei
Now she's mad I made her turn it on.
They are an English football squad that goes by the full name of Tottenham Hotspur.
I called my mom to make sure she was watching.
Well, it's not like Walton was only known for his announcing. He had a little bit of cachet from his playing days too. :)
And now I shall duck.
Ned strikes again.
This is not exactly going out on a limb though.
The Angels seem like a pretty bright organization yet they are giving almost $6 million next year to Chone Figgins, who had an OPS+ of 82 last year and a SLG of .318 to play 3B.
I know he steals some bases but he doesn't seem like much of a value to me.
Feel free to disagree but I don't get it.
Having Chone Figgins isn't the problem, playing him at 3rd base or starting him at Left Field is. Angels should get him to play some 2nd base when Howie Kendricks is out.
should the Dodgers sign Manny Ramirez Mr. Ultimo?
Colletti, as quoted on Diamond Leung's blog.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/2009/01/dodgers-gm-colletti-on-giants.html
Ned is showing how he keeps the organization aligned top to bottom, faintly echoing Jamie McCourt's musings on baseball salaries vs. the current economy.
Oh well, nobody's perfect.
--
Btw, on another subject, this irritated me for some reason (in that story on Mota coming and Jones going). Grrrr:
>>For what it's worth, Jones attended the Duke-Georgia Tech basketball game Wednesday night wearing an Atlanta Braves cap. <<
Didn't Don Cheadle star in The Andruw Jones' Story recently?
Or is "Hotel for Dogs" the Andruw Jones story?
And come to think of it, what the heck is Cheadle doing in that movie by the way?
Bye-bye Jonsey
Hi jokah - be seeing you in beautiful New Mexico.
So does that mean 2y/$50 mil gets us Manny?
>>On the day Fred Lewis staked his claim to the Giants' left-field job, the agent for left fielder Manny Ramirez used the local airwaves to sing the praises of his high-priced and still unsigned client.
Scott Boras did not address the Giants' pursuit in the Ramirez sweepstakes during his nearly 15-minute interview on KNBR on Wednesday. But when asked if Ramirez would like to play for the Giants, Boras said, "I think Manny wants to win, and Manny wants to play for a team that wants him."
Boras went on to say "the Giants are a team that has just an extraordinarily young nucleus of pitching. They remind me a great deal of the 2003 Florida Marlins. ... There is a potential there to, if he were on that team, make it a winner. When we were looking for potential suitors, it was clear Manny felt that the Giants were a team that had a chance to go somewhere."<<
http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_11457335
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.