Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
You know what this is?
000 100 000 - 1
100 020 00x - 3
Or this?
101 000 000 - 2
200 010 00x - 3
This is not liking a girl on first glance, discovering as you go that she has substance and some nice qualities - and then realizing, after it's too late, that you're too shallow for her anyway.
8 -- LOL
I need to get to "Acceptance." I thought I was there, but it appears that I'm not.
Baseball Robinsons I like:
Jackie
Wilbert
Baseball Robinsons I think are overrated:
Brooks
Baseball Robinsons who had a job for far longer than they deserved:
Kerry
Jeff (both of them)
Baseball Robinsons I despise:
Frank
I'm still mad about his 1972 season with the Dodgers too!
James Loney has been on fire and is finally hitting again.
I'm expecting Depo to make a big trade and we will be without a few prospects in about one month. I thought Broxton would get traded but now it looks like we will need him in the bullpen. Still have plenty of ammunition, just curious which bullets our GM will use.
Mrs.
The LA Times reports that DePodesta is looking at more of a rotation filler (Cincinnati's Aaron Harang, Colorado's Joe Kennedy, Toronto's Ted Lilly, Detroit's Mike Maroth and Pittsburgh's Mark Redman). None of these guys should require a large outlay of prospects, though the downside is that none of these guys would make much of an impact. Harang and Redman have pitched very well this year, but their career averages loom large in the background. Lilly was projected to the best of the bunch coming into this season, but he's pitched horribly so far. Kennedy has one year of good performance surrounded by a lot of sub-mediocrity. Maroth is the most consistent of the bunch, but the consistency is only in his mediocrity.
I'm not bitter...
1. NL East - .532 (173 - 152)
2. AL Central - .524 (166 - 151)
3. AL East - .500 (163 - 163)
4. AL West - .496 (127 - 129)
5. NL Central - .482 (186 - 200)
6. NL West - .469 (151 - 171)
#18: Here's AL vs. NL, overall:
1. AL - .507 (456 - 443)
2. NL - .494 (510 - 523)
So, the AL is +13 games over the NL, but most of that came from the +10 performance yesterday.
Toronto is in the AL East race. Why would they be trading Lilly?
Harang has some upside and actually strikes out hitters so he probably wouldn't fit in with this current weak ass strike out staff.
I have no idea what to make of Joe Kennedy since he pitches at Colorado. He was a ballyhooed prospect who was solid in the beginning for Tampa Bay and then was ineffective, was shipped to Colorado and actually had a decent year in mile high last high. Sucks again this year.
Not sure how any of these are a big enough improvement on what DJ Houlton/Thompson have given us. Unless they feel that OP will not be coming back soon then I can understand the need for another pitcher. Otherwise in two weeks if Werth is still werthless then we need a LF with some pop.
Dodgers extending Weaver's deal?
Dodgers GM Paul DePodesta told The Los Angeles Times he probably would begin talks soon with right-hander Jeff Weaver on a contract extension. Weaver reportedly has said he would like to remain with the team.
The Dodgers, however, might not be willing to match Weaver's current salary of $9.25 million.
"Jeff has done a terrific job," DePodesta told The Times. "We'd all be interested in [an extension]."
Granted, it's from ESPN's "Rumor Central" but I just do not get why we would extend Weaver. That would give us the same 4 mediocre pitchers we've suffered through this year, for at least the next two years?!?
2003: 7.12 K/9
2004: 4.80 K/9
2005: 4.53 K/9
And he's 31 years old, so it's unlikely that his improvement is real. A lot more flyballs are getting caught rather than going over the wall (.40 HR/9 this year vs. .95 HR/9 over his career). A lot more balls in play are turning into outs (.260 BABIP this year vs. .292 BABIP over his career). Some of this could be real improvement, but most GMs will pay for it like it's all real improvement. Thus, he's probably not a good value.
Harang would be another good candidate, because as you mentioned, he has some upside. He's younger, at 27, and his improvement has come through significantly increasing his K-rate (8.68 K/9 this year vs. 7.03 K/9 for his career) as well as dropping his HR-rate (.65 HR/9 this year vs. 1.13 HR/9 for his career). I'm more comfortable with a pitcher dropping his HR-rate when it's associated with generally increased dominance. Also, his BABIP this year (.307) is in line with his career average (.300), so luck doesn't seem to be a huge factor.
The two reasons Toronto might consider trading Lilly are:
1) Toronto always considers trading players. They have to in order to stay competitive on a year-to-year basis.
2) Lilly has not been performing well this year and there's supposedly been some friction with the coaching staff.
How does Lowe feel about going into tonight's game knowing if he allows 3 runs he's probably going to lose (rhetorical question)?
It's a team. Both units need to pick each other up when the other is struggling.
Outside of Erickson's comments earlier this year, and Weaver's comments that I think we're a bit overblown, I haven't heard any snippiness coming from either side.
1) If anything, our experience this year shows that you need to have more than 5 starting pitchers, because at any time at least one of them will be ineffective or injured.
2) The free agent starting pitchers after this season are essentially Burnett or Bust. When you compare Weaver to the other guys we could end up signing, he starts to look a lot better.
3) Our top minor league pitchers won't be ready to contribute in the starting rotation until 2007, so we need to fill that gap somehow.
My take is that if DePodesta is able to trade for a starting pitcher signed beyond this season, he'll let Weaver walk. Otherwise, DePodesta will push hard for resigning him.
I could really see him going back to Detroit.
Weaver returns to Detroit this offseason, for 3yrs/$21M.
I wouldn't doubt that the rumors about friction with the Blue Jays coaching staff are true -- he was frequently at odds with the A's coaching staff during his tenure there. There were times when he was forbidden from shaking off signs from the catcher, because the coaches were so fed up with his refusal to listen to their suggestions. While the Dodger pitching coaches have hardly inspired much optimism this year, I don't think another fragile, volatile pitcher is what this team needs.
# 31 The Twins don't stink, they have the best defense up the middle in all of baseball, the best bullpen in all of baseball and enough hitting to get the job done. We start A Perez at SS, Edwards at 3b, Werth in RF, Grabowski in LF and you think the Twins stink. With the injuries, we are not fielding a very good team right now. For this team to be competitive Milton Bradley needs to play and Jason Werth needs to hit like he did last year. Until Werth stops his Royce Clayton act we are at a huge disadvantage. He has been by far the worse starting RF/LF in baseball since his return with a negative VORP. It is hard to generate alot of offense when your corner outfielders (Grabowski/Werth) both have negative VORPS and are both the worse at their position except for Brian Jordan in the NL.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.