
|
Head to Head
2005-06-23 11:19
* * * ESPN.com has a nice little head-to-head player comparison feature that I never noticed before. * * * What's wrong with Hee Seop Choi? Righthander on the mound for San Diego. Right-handed batters Mike Edwards, Jayson Werth, Olmedo Saenz, Jason Phillips (at first base) and Jason Repko in the lineup. Choi on the bench. Unless Choi is hurt, Jim Tracy has declared a police action against him.
|
It didn't work very well and after a while you could guess what pitches were coming by the way the person who was the pitcher was moving his fingers.
My nephew got one of those old hand-held electronic baseball games for Christmas last year. He went nuts over it. But there were many high scoring games. We played games that were 25-23 in five innings.
Before I was given the gift of Strat-o-Matic, we played All-Star Baseball. With the two spinners? And the Wrigley Field backdrop? Did you have that?
Someone needs to take the F-J disc out of Jim Tracy's hands.
Back in "my day", we had a little thing called RBI Baseball on Nintendo. Tony Armas was king!
June 23, 1914
Brooklyn needed just 71 minutes to polish off Pittsburgh, 2-1, in a game at Ebbets Field behind some good pitching from Nap Rucker. But the win improved Brooklyn to just 23-28 and they were in seventh place, 9 games behind the Giants and only 2 games ahead of last place Boston.
Zack Wheat drove in both runs for Brooklyn in the first when he singled home Ollie O'Mara and Jake Daubert. Pittsburgh scored its only run in the eighth when Max Carey and Mike Mowrey singled. Carey scored on a force out from Jim Viox.
Rucker gave up just 6 hits and walked 2, but stuck out none. The veteran lefty would make only 16 starts in 1914 and finshed 7-6. Jeff Pfeffer was the staff ace with a 23-12 record.
1914 was a year of change in baseball and in Brooklyn. There was a new competitor to the AL and NL in the presence of the Federal League. And the Dodgers had a new manager and an added nickname. Wilbert Robinson, who was a longtime coach for the Giants John McGraw, had a falling out with McGraw and took the head job on the other side of the East River. Robinson would end up managing the team for 18 seasons and eventually become a part owner of the team. New York newspapers began calling the team "The Robins" in honor of Robinson. (Later they would be called the Robins in derision.)
Robinson got immediate results, improving the team's record by 10 wins, finishing 75-79 and in fifth place, 19 ½ games behind Boston, which rallied all the way from last place in June to win the pennant by 10 ½ games. Boston was the first team other than Pittsburgh, Chicago or New York to win the National League since Brooklyn won in 1900.
Brooklyn's offense used four very good hitters. Wheat turned in one of his typical strong years, batting .319 and driving in 89. Daubert batted .329 at first base to lead the league. Casey Stengel batted .316 with a league-leading .404 OBP and Jack Dalton contributed a .319 average. Brooklyn went 1-3-4-5 in the NL batting average race.
But pitching was still the name of the game in the Deadball Era. And the Brooklyn pitchers were good, but not great. And without a healthy Rucker, the team was going to have to find another ace to go with Pfeffer to be a pennant contender.
Thanks to the New York Times, BaseballReference.com and Retrosheet
"The Dodgers lineup again figures to be without J.D. Drew, who is nursing a sore knee, but it's unlikely that manager Jim Tracy will call on Olmedo Saenz for a day game after a night game, even though he had three hits and scored three runs Wednesday night. One option would be to play Jason Phillips at first base and catch rookie Mike Rose. "
Don't break our Olmedo!
I had a Strat-O-Matic year with Manny Mota, who as a pinch hitter had batted either high 300's or low 400's. He got considerably more at-bats with my team that year also!
Izturis is 12 for 36 against Lawrence with a home run.
Kent is 2 for 9 with both hits being homers.
Werth is 3 for 8.
Choi is 0 for 5.
Dessens is 1 for 1 with a double.
Phillips is 1 for 2
Saenz is 0 for 1
Padres team batting average .262
Dodgers team runs scored 321
Padres team runs scored 321
Burroughs is 8 for 15
Fick is 2 for 5
Giles is 17 for 34 with 4 home runs
Greene is 1 for 5
Jackson is 2 for 4
Blum is 5 for 7
Nady is 3 for 6
Ojeda is 1 for 6
Roberts is 7 for 19
Sweeney is 1 for 4
Lawrence is 0 for 2
The Lees have 42 homers between them now.
As for Choi, he's looked bad at the plate lately, but that's no excuse for starting Edwards, Rose and all seven Ja(y)sons ahead of him.
At least Repko is off today.
The other excuse could be keeping Phillips' bat in the lineup while giving him a rest from catching. I have a tough time imagining that Phillips is a better choice than Choi.
It's not that Tracy has lost confidence in Choi. It's that he's never had confidence in Choi at all, because Choi ate JT's pet eel or something.
Darn it!
At least he's batting 8th.
At least I can't watch today.
Please don't misunderstand, I'm not advocating that we drop Izturis during his slump and play Perez. I haven't given up on Izzy. Just pointing out that if JT is going to play Phillips instead of the cold Choi at 1B, playing Perez instead of the cold Izturis at SS isn't that much different. And if Izzy stays in the line-up through his slumps, there's really no reason why Choi shouldn't have that same opportunity when he's the more fearsome power hitter when hot.
I guess it helps that the Dodgers aren't facing one of the more fearsome offenses in the majors.
The Padres are good, but they're no Kansas City Royals.
Occasional mental miscue? if you consider only once an inning to be occasional....
Thank you Yhency!
that has you worried? Lawrence is mowing the Dodgers down with ease, and Dessens not allowing a run in the first has you worried?
While the reverse L/R numbers posted by Fearing Blue are probably not statistically significant, it's classic Tracy to rely on such numbers. Let's face it: 88.2 innings pitched is more than 11 AB.
Its not that I don't like him, hell, I don't even know him
okay, now you can be worried....
He has significantly fewer appearances against the other three NL West opponents.
I was aggravated when he got in Kent's way on that weird play. I thought of this the other day when Vin said something about how Lowe was on his knees... I was thinking Vin was making a clever pun about praying, but he might have also been quietly making a point. That's what I got out of it, it should be instintive to get down. But most of the defensive flubs I've seen by Choi are the weird can happen to anybody things. Tracy is clearly unhinged. I'm still not quite on the FJT bandwagon, but I'm worried about the rest of the year.
db, the original RBI Baseball for Nintendo is indeed the best game ever. I liked how the field was always post-rain delay.
Did anyone have the Parker Bros. Starting Lineup Talking Baseball game, or was I the only one?
Bases Loaded 2 for the NES was great, in part because the NY team had a LH submariner that was unhittable. The LA players also had names that were derivative of Hollywood stars.
MVP Baseball is simply awesome, with the exception that it's nearly impossible for me to get a hit on MVP mode.
That said, the logic of not starting Choi in favor of an out-of-position .700 catcher is proof of:
(1) undisclosed injury [unlikely, unless it's a splinter]
(2) lunacy
(3) "Please Please PLEASE fire me so I can go manage in Ohio."
I imagine that thing drove your parents crazy in the car. I can still hear the voice say, "Trammell, the DH."
At this point, I don't mind my tax dollars being used to keep him out of the dugout.
I'm just imagining the conversations between Kent is going to start...
Was Iassogna at first the other night, too?
I can't answer that question."
Those games would take years, though.
His footwork is bad; I've seen him start off with the wrong foot, plus he is just slow. I am not convinced he has good instincts, either.
However, I would be more forgiving of the defensive deficits if he put up 35 HR a year.
His only above-average skills are handling poor throws.
Oh, that's right, we're not trying to win today.
He'd do just that if his manager didn't refuse to play him.
He'd theoretically reach 30 quite easily, In fact, he's on pace to hit exactly 30 as it stands now.
Thanks to Jon's ESPN head-to-head link for that.
Repko is hitting .193/.287/.360, but is apparently doing something the right way. Maybe he gives better massages.
Hee Seop should change his name to Harry Chandler. I bet that'd give him more at-bats.
Might as well just leave Elmer out there to die, then.
Colborn: Well, the game is essentially out of reach for our offense, so, lets just work on some mechanics while you're up here.
Dessens: Did you see my 2 hit start last week?
Thanks.
too bad choi isn't scappy.
C. Izturis SS 0-1
M. Edwards LF 0-2
J. Werth RF 0-2
J. Kent 2B 0-2
O. Saenz 3B 0-2
J. Phillips 1B 0-2
M. Rose C 1-2
J. Repko CF 0-2
E. Dessens P 0-1
Choi had better be hurt.
What do Bradley and Drew have in common? They have both played more than 140 games only once. Building a team with paper mache is not Tracy's fault.
And playing Mike Edwards and pick-a-Jason ahead of Choi and Perez is just plain inexcusable. This team is depleted due to injury, but Tracy is going out of his way to put together the weakest lineup he can with the pieces available. I don't think he's aiming for the weakest possible lineup, but whatever his intention, that's what he's doing. OK, I guess it could be worse - he could start Robles instead of Kent...
Shawn Green was healthy his whole career until that shoulder problem came out of nowhere and sapped his power forever.
148: Again, I grant that Drew was risky. But some injuries raise red flags for the future (like his balky knee), while others are irrelevant. There is no way that Werth's broken wrist on a HBP was predictable. Same for Bradley's torn finger tendon. These are freak injuries, not inevitable outcomes with fragile players.
Did Vin say that? Makes no sense to me.
My dream lineup? Thats not my dream lineup, I was just supposing what Dan Evans would have had if he hadn't been dumped. I doubt he would have offered Beltre to the Padres for Sean Burroughs and a minor leaguer before last season like Depodesta did.
When the season began, our bench was expected to be Ledee, Grabowski, Bako, APerez, Saenz. Pretty decent group there.
Edwards, Repko, Rose, et al weren't even supposed to be on the ML roster, let alone regular starters.
So you're penalizing Depodesta not for having weak backups, but for having weak backups for the backups!
Depodesta has made some incredible moves (mostly of the small variety). Some of his moves are just not defendable unless the money situation is so bad that is all economic.
28 million annually tied up in Drew, Lowe and Penny is not promising, unless we go on another rookie of the year run.
Huh? You mean a top-10 OF who hasn't been on the DL all season and our two best starting pitchers?
Hasn't Thompson been hurting, though? Maybe that's why he'd be the one to go.
(Though I do think that repeating points to emphasize them follows the law of diminishing returns.)
2B/SS/3B: Antonio Perez
LF/CF/RF: Ricky Ledee
1B/3B: Olmedo Saenz
LF/1B/C: Jason Grabowski
C: Paul Bako
Besides Saenz, all of our bench players have spent significant time on the DL.
And I gather Phillips is playing fine; no dig on him, it's just jarring.
Had they been able to afford him, I'm sure the Braves would've tried to keep Drew. He had a fantastic year for them.
I know you have some Chipper Jones quotes you always like to bring up, but I also recall hearing some strong praise from Bobby Cox.
As far as Thompson over Erickson, my hate for this team, Tracy, DePodesta, etc. is beginning to lack boundaries.
The Braves and Cardinals got rid of a top 10 OF...not any time soon.
Our two best pitchers don't mean much when they are going against Weaver, Odalis and Erickson. I hope for 17 million they are better.
We've heard that he's way below league average in sacrifice attempts (good). And in this series, anyway, he seems to have taken out his starters at exactly the right time - BEFORE they melt down, at the first sign of trouble, and not AFTER.
That being said, I cannot fathom ANY reason why you'd keep Erickson and send Thompson down. I'll give Depo full credit for wisely locking up solid potential free agents at good rates, but he deserves to be knocked about for this incomprehensible attachment to Erickson.
And they are 2 for 2 today
Who would you rather have, stubbs? List some actual names and salaries.
Clement and Radke don't count because they didn't want to play out west.
Nooooooooooooooooooooo!
Of course - Play for one run!
http://tinyurl.com/9mzu5
That's probably all BS, but sometimes conspiracy theories are comforting.
223 -- DePo is going to get crucified for firing Tracy. There is no amount of Tracy idiocy that will change that.
Hence, the Cincinnati Kid Option.
I like your theory
" it's stupid not to give Choi the same chance...It's not that Tracy has lost confidence in Choi. It's that he's never had confidence in Choi at all, because Choi ate JT's pet eel or something. "
i'm sure the eel thing was an accident. right now, asian choi-fans are pissed off enough to eat tracy's dog; but they would never do that because the dog shows signs of intelligence, unlike the owner.
and subbing in antonio perez for choi to bunt again last night... contempt? or stupidity?
Meanwhile, Choi probably could have gone 0-4 at first.
Have Weaver, Saenz, Lowe, or Werth ever had their name in a headline not be used in pun form?
The smart thing, which happens much more here than in the mainstream media (and understandably so) is to recognize that managerial moves matter on the margin, and that managers shouldn't be judged on wins and losses any more than pitchers should. Managers should be judged on their "component stats" Problem is that it takes close scrutiny to figure out what those are, since there's no box score for managers.
Or, perhaps you'd think Carrara is pitching.
Perhaps...what does everyone else think about this idea?
then it was DePo being crucified for the trade bringing us Choi...
now it is Choi our savior being mistreated by Tracy
yes we can, we are really good at giving up lead off walks
According to Steiner, Old Maid told Tracey he is ready to play today by saying" I'm ready Skip, I woke up this morning feeling sexy."
Monday started making "I'm too sexy for my shirt" jokes.
Me? I'm going to cut my ears off now.
Okay, that's one, but he wasn't going to sign an extension past this season because he wanted to be closer to home.
Who else for this season? And who replaces Hudson next season?
I just was making a point that most of you have done a 180 on Choi since September
Gio has a fresher arm, and I AM a good luck charm for him.
maybe DePo and Lisa have a thing going
I think you're wrong, Howard. The Choi supporters are the ones who've always wanted to see him play.
The Choi detractors are the ones who think Tracy can do no wrong.
And this is ignoring the belief that Choi would actually improve if he weren't jerked around so much.
HA! So as I type this, Tracy brings Choi in to PH against a lefty. I'm glad to see him, but this is quite the opposite of "putting him in a position to succeed." Perez is available.
i would need to look at who was available and for how much..obv Clement, Miller, Pavano and Lieber come to mind.
I think Hudson not signing with us past this year is b.s...money talks and so does playing in a big market.
keep in mind we'd still have the duke and mota to trade for a starter this year.
Icaros, I think you just like to argue whatever point I make....
Ah, so that's Tracy's "logic" for bringing Choi in just then.
either the conspiracy theorists are right, or there IS no strategy and tracy is sitting on the bench with a pair of dice to guide the way.
273: Hmmm would I want my wife to sleep with the boss to save my job? In the Great Escape when Ali McGraw did it to get Steve McQueen out of jail it seemed okay. But Erickson ain't no Steve McQueen. In fact he is the anti-McQueen.
There wasn't a chance of getting Hudson even for this one season. Beane knew Huddy wanted to go to the Braves, and respected his wishes. (Some might bash Beane for that--I personally don't lean either way on it. On the one hand, baseball is a business. On the other hand, it was a classy gesture towards a man who'd been an ace for the team for years.)
I was kidding, I think....
we have four guys in the lineup right now that started their careers as catchers.
I agree, except that dice would come up with the right answer 1/6 of the time...
I already addressed Clement--he's out.
Miller was injured coming in and hasn't done anything yet.
Pavano made it known to everyone he wanted to be a Yankee, and he hasn't been nearly as good as he was last year.
Lieber seems like a good choice, but you'd have heard a lot of whining about his injury history.
I think Hudson not signing with us past this year is b.s...money talks and so does playing in a big market.
Not true, ask Clement and Radke. The Braves don't have the funds to match a lot of teams. Hudson signed with them for cheap so he could be close to home.
keep in mind we'd still have the duke and mota to trade for a starter this year.
Probably wouldn't get anyone nearly as good as Penny this year, since Mota has been awful.
You have lots of criticism, but you haven't studied the reality of the pitching market in baseball. If you come up with any other realistic ideas better than what we have, let me know.
I am no fan of Tracy, far from it. But there is no way someone associated with a professional team....player, coach, manager...is deliberately sabotaging things just to get even with someone