Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
* * *
I've certainly never thought of Tommy Lasorda on the same level as Vin Scully or Sandy Koufax, but I guess he did play as important a role as anyone in popularizing the Dodgers through the 1970s and 1980s, afer Scully was established and Koufax had departed the scene.
From Bob Keisser of the Long Beach Press-Telegram:
It isn't a reach for Dodgers fans to think in religious terms when assessing the value of the three precious gifts Brooklyn gave Los Angeles when the Dodgers moved here in 1958.
Vin Scully, Sandy Koufax and Tommy Lasorda turned out to be as valuable here as gold, frankincense and myrrh - consider them the Three Wise Men of Los Angeles Dodgers baseball.
* * *
Paul DePodesta falls on his sword throughout the media world this morning, without specifics.
Will Jim Tracy show any accountability for the disappointment of 2005? Frank McCourt on Friday, DePodesta on Saturday. It would seem to be Tracy's turn at the plate.
Doubt it. His scrapbook of newspaper clippings tells him he's a genius.
Tracy won't be falling on his sword. He seems quite humble, yet I've never heard him ever admit to making a mistake.
That's the only time I remember him admitting to anything.
Here's a quote from the Viewpoint section of today's Times that I thought was pretty hilarious -
"Trivia question: What do you get when you combine the consistency and professionalism of Jeff Kent with the raw talent and heart of Milton Bradley?
Trivia answer: Paul Lo Duca, Adrian Beltre, Alex Cora and Dave Roberts."
As I think about it more, it's not the nature of managers to admit they made a mistake.
I doubt that Tony La Russa has admitted making a mistake. Nor has Joe Torre or Bobby Cox. Buddy Bell probably thinks he's blameless.
I don't believe any of the printed letters in the Times wanted Shawn Green back, which I found unusual.
But the Cult of Alex Cora has made a resurgence.
"Chemistry is definitely important," DePodesta said. "I've said for a long time that it is the difference between major league players and championship players. You have to have the competitiveness and self-esteem to achieve at the highest level."
He said he sought those traits in bringing in players with playoff experience such as Kent, Ledee and Lowe.
"There comes a time when you have to realize that not every player can do everything you want."
That pretty much seals Bradley's death warrant.
He actually said, "If they sucked, I must have sucked."
He then went on to put down Moneyball.
I'm trying to think of teams that could use a power-hitting center fielder.
In the NL West, the Giants and Padres could use Bradley. Arizona has no place to play him since they have to keep Shawn Green around and they young outfielders. The Rockies have enough young guys to play center.
The Cardinals have Jim Edmonds. The Brewers have Brady Clark (well, he might be good next year). The Cubs ???. Hmmm.... The Astros probably don't need Bradley. The Pirates wouldn't know what to do with him.
The Reds have this guy named Griffey.
As for the East, I think the Braves like their CF. The Nationals don't. The Phillies don't have a regular one. The Mets most certainly do. The Marlins probably think Juan Pierre is going to be an offensive force.
The Yankees are going to need a center fielder for 2006.
To non-tender and then watch him go to a division rival would be silly. Sure, he probably won't bring back much in trade, due to the circumstances, but the real issue is having some control over where he goes next year.
First, there's this quote, "There are definitely things, if we could do over again, we would," he said. "You learn as you go and you hope you don't make the same mistakes the next time. I'll keep to myself what they were so I don't share with the competition what we did wrong."
http://tinyurl.com/7tkjf
I would submit that DePodesta is admitting to making mistakes, but not necessarilly the mistakes alleged by the CW MSM.
Do I know what those mistakes are? I do not. But it might have something to do with the defensive metrics used, or possibly overpaying for starting pitching, and possibly not having enough depth, and almost certainly not insisting enough that the best players must play.
Also, I'm not sure that Milton Bradley doesn't meet DePo's definition of a "championship player." Actually, I think both Kent and Bradley meet the definition.
Further, in terms of trading Bradley, I doubt we'd get anything like fair value. I would think we would offer arbitration (and due to injury and perceived problems his salary will likely be reduced, which would increase his trade value).
In my opinion, when you accept the premise of the CW MSM you've already failed to understand DePo.
All he's doing is pretending to fess up to the MSM's accusations, when in actuality he is admitting to very different mistakes, measured on his own terms and by his own metrics.
Additionally, just because it appears that DePo isn't looking at firing Tracy, don't count on him being back. Why couldn't it be the case that he's attempting to keep Tracy's reputation as a "genius" high to ensure that teams like the Reds would consider hiring him?
I am almost certain that this is DePo's dream situation. He doesn't want to have to deal with the know-nothing media and their irrational obsession with Jim Tracy (and Alex Cora, and Dave Roberts, and etc., etc.). The perfect solution is for Tracy to be offered a job elsewhere.
Then everyone in the Dodgers organization could talk fondly about him, wish him well, and then hire a Macha-clone.
But the A's can't manufacture runs in the playoffs. You need Alex Cora to do things like that!
Sheesh, everybody knows that!
I can understand people missing Lo Duca. I can understand people missing Beltre's 2004 production, but it's quite likely that these same letter-writers to the Times hated Beltre during his early struggles with the team. And then underestimated how good he was in other years. And they'd they complain that Beltre wasn't playing well enough to earn his money this year.
And I seem to see a dearth of letters by Angels fans complaining about how awful Steve Finley is this year. Baseball Prospectus rates Finley at #881 in VORP. Two Dodgers are worse: Nakamura (887) and Grabowski (910). They rate 914 players, the worst being Cristian Guzman.
It's also not the same thing as being willing to hold hands with your teammates and sing campfire songs with them. And I think therein lies DePo's criterion for deciding whether or not to keep Bradley: If he and Kent let their personal differences affect on-field performance, they are not 'championship players.' But as long as they perform on the field, it doesn't matter whether they argue like the Hatfields and the McCoys off of it.
Difference is Furcal seems to do that on a regular basis and he strikes me as a far better than average fielder.
Unfortunately, Izzy's trade value is nil right now, but Furcal has proven himself over a number of seasons.
August 27, 1895
Before a crowd of about 1,200 at Eastern Park, Brooklyn used two big innings to rout eleventh place St. Louis, 12-5. The win improved Brooklyn's record to 56-45 and in a tie for fifth place, 8 games behind first place Baltimore and 9 games behind second place Cleveland. The standings were confusing at the time. Baltimore had a higher winning percentage than Cleveland, but had played 8 fewer games. The newspapers reported Brooklyn's record as 57-45, but Brooklyn would later lose a win when a June 1 win against the Pirates was subsequently declared a no contest. The Dodgers had won a forfeit in Louisville on May 23, when Louisville failed to bring enough baseballs to the stadium.
Brooklyn got to St. Louis starter Bill Kissinger early. They knocked him out with five runs on seven hits in the second inning. Reliever Red Ehret calmed things downed until the sixth. Then Brooklyn scored seven runs to put the game away.
Player manager Dave Foutz left his starter Ad Gumbert in the game for seven innings. Foutz brought in rookie Jack Cronin to pitch the last two innings and he gave up two runs in the 8th and 3 runs in the 9th. Cronin would not return to the majors until 1898 and would pitch for six different teams and would eventually return to Brooklyn in 1904.
When the dust cleared at the end of the 1895 season, Brooklyn finished 71-60 and tied for fifth with Boston, 16 ½ games behind first place Baltimore.
Center fielder Mike Griffin was the big star for Brooklyn in 1895. Griffin batted .333 with a .444 OBP. He drew 93 walks and scored 140 runs. First baseman Candy LaChance batted .312 and drove in 108 runs.
Brooklyn's pitching staff was not much to brag about in 1895. Brickyard Kennedy led the staff with 19 wins (against 12 losses), but had an ERA of 5.12. Ed Stein was 15-13 with a 4.72 ERA.
The National League at this time was the domain of the Baltimore Orioles. Brooklyn was going to need some help from syndicate ownership to make themselves pennant contenders again.
Thanks to the New York Times, BaseballReference.com and Retrosheet
Izturis 257/302/322 in 444 ABs, 25 BB, 51 K (8 SB, 8 CS here is an example of when it is not)
FWIW, here's what Rotoworld's Matthew Pouliot has to say about Furcal: "Furcal's performance over the first few months led to rumors that the Braves would just trade him and go with Wilson Betemit at shortstop the rest of the way. There was probably never any real chance of that happening, though. Furcal bounced back with a huge July and the rumors died leading up to the deadline. The Braves remain very unlikely to re-sign Furcal this winter. He'll be looking for at least $8 million per year, and Atlanta can get just as much offense at shortstop from Betemit. Expect the Diamondbacks, Cubs and maybe the Tigers or Nationals to pursue the leadoff hitter. The Marlins would be a darkhorse if they decided to move Juan Pierre. Prediction: Diamondbacks - five years, $40 million"
http://tinyurl.com/dnm9n
That seems rather steep. I'd rather see if Guzman (JtD) can play SS in the bigs.
Clayton has never had an OPS+ over 100. He got to 98 with Texas in 1999.
He has a lifetime OBP of .313 (coming into this year) Which is actually higher than Cesar Izturis .293 OBP coming into this year.
5 yrs and 40 mil does seem a little steep, but on the other hand if I picture him starting at short for the D'Backs, maybe it's at least worth considering. I really would hate to see him wind up with another team in the West.
I may be totally wrong, but I would bet that Guzman will never spend a full season at short for the Blue. If he does his playing in L.A., I have a hunch it will be in the outfield (or at third, if they decide to move LaRoche for someone like Dunn).
By the way, Mr. Fundamentals, Mr. Heart-and-Soul, Derek Jeter had the worst zone rating among regulars from 2001-03...and he won a gold glove in 2004 because it improved to the league average.
Furcal - SS
Bradley-CF(still think we should keep him)
Drew - RF
Dunn - LF
Kent - 2B
Choi - 1B
Perez - 3B
Navarro - C
Penny - P
Of course, that would cost a couple of good prospects to get Dunn, but let's see what DePo can pull off.
This is of course what you get now when you start to say that "character" is a big issue in player evaluation.
I think chemistry is more important than character and with that in mind, I hereby substitute Sidney Ponson for Penny as my opening day starter
http://tinyurl.com/7rwwo
If they're comparing him to Juan Gonzalez, I suggest we trade him quickly before he hurts his back.
Arbitration eligible should mean we only have to go one year
i'll be very dissapionted if depodesta leaves/gets fired and i'll be even more dissapointed if tracy sticks around.
i've been waiting for the dodgers to hire a gm that knows the ability to get on base and hit for power with good pitching wins games, and that is depodesta.
for the most part depodesta has put together that type of team, but the other part of the team is what tracy loves and is just enough to get in the way of winning games.
I've also felt Milton was not displaying enough hustle sometimes, but that really doesn't fit his personality. It may be that he's hurting even more often than we realize but just not saying anything. I seem to remember reading somewhere this morning that the knee problem could be "weeks old".
I can't justify playing Perez instead of Kent, but I also don't see the logic in playing Valentin or Edwards ahead of Perez at third. I think the jury is still out on Robles. He might be worth platooning with Perez since one hits right and the other left, although I think Robles makes a great first sub at second, third and short, which would give him plenty of playing time.
the dodgers should work with perez on defense and groom him for ss next year, then move him to 2b when kent leaves and give guzman ss in 2007.
i'd personally like to see in 2006
martin c
choi 1b
drew of
kent 2b
giles of
bradley of
perez ss
mueller 3b
if martin isn't ready then
perez ss
choi 1b
drew of
kent 2b
giles of
bradley of
navarro/mueller
navarro/mueller
i don't think dunn is worth what we would have to give up.
laroche takes over at 3b when he is ready (2007 probably).
and we definately need a penny type starting pitcher for 2006, weaver will be gone, lets upgrade with someone better than weaver, a penny type, then when billingsley is ready (2007) trade lowe (1 year left on his contract), some team would want him for 1 year.
just my 2 cents.
Russ Martin: super-nice to animals.
JtD: fights corporate crime during the off season.
Chad Billingsly: Good listener/totally respects women.
Andy LaRouche: that scruffy goutee? Worn in protest of Burma's oppression of Aung San Suu Kyi.
Giles in LF would also be a huge upgrade.
Dunn would be a major acquisition:
I can dream...
SS- Furcal
LF- Giles
CF- Drew
RF- Dunn
2b- Kent
1b- Choi
3rd- Perez
C- Navarro
Pitcher
Bench: Robles, Cruz, Ledee, Werth, Saenz
Starters: Penny, Houlton, Lowe, Perez, Billingsley
I definitely believe AP can be a MLB average 3rd basemen. I think he should get as much time there in winterball as possible.
OK, somebody care to calculate what kind of budget we would need to pull off oldbear's lineup?
We don't have Dreifort or Green on the books next year, so maybe it's possible.
Delwyn Young: wears his goatee in protest of LaRouche's refusing to call Burma, Myanmar. Has called LaRouche a "filthy imperialist". Possible chemistry problem.
Are we generally targeting something like Dessens, Sanchez, Brazoban, Schmoll/Osoria, Broxton, Gagne for the bullpen? Or do we decline Dessens' option? Since Sanchez has that change working so well consistently, I'm not as fond of trading him as I had been
Wilson Alvarez - Gone.
Yhency Brazoban - Keep.
Jonathan Broxton - Keep.
Giovanni Carrara - Probably gone, but I can see the merits of sticking with him if the price is right.
Elmer Dessens - Replaceable, but the comment for Carrara applies here.
Darren Dreifort - Good riddance, although I'll enjoy the memory of attending his start where he K'd a career-best 12 including 7 in the first two innings.
Eric Gagne - Get well soon.
Joel Hanrahan - Just about done as a prospect, I believe.
D.J. Houlton - Listen to offers in the offseason, and if nothing comes of the let him fight for a rotation slot during spring training.
Edwin Jackson - Keep, but listen to offers. (As you can tell, I'm a firm believer in TINSTAAPP.)
Ryan Ketchner - Recovering from TJ surgery.
Derek Lowe - Stuck with him, for the time being.
Franquelis Osoria - Filler.
Brad Penny - Keep.
Odalis Perez - Keep, and pray he finds some consistency.
Duaner Sanchez - Keep, but listen to offers.
Steve Schmoll - K, blto.
Derek Thompson - Showed some potential, but hurt.
Jeff Weaver - I'd try to bring him back, if the money isn't crazy. Considering his agent, though, I'm not optimistic.
Kelly Wunsch - Replaceable.
Paul Bako - Hiya, Coach.
Russell Martin - Keep.
Dioner Navarro - Keep. He and Martin could make a nice platoon someday.
Jason Phillips - Ugh. Philllips' VORP: 4.3. Ishii's VORP: -0.6.
Mike Rose - Gone.
Willy Aybar - Keep.
Hee-Seop Choi - Keep.
Cesar Izturis - Has value, but not if he's thought of as a star. Or a leadoff hitter.
Jeff Kent - Oooh, tricky. I know he's the offensive MVP, but I've never really warmed to his contributions.
Antonio Perez - Whether he stays or goes depends on him finding a position.
Oscar Robles - Decent, as a backup.
Olmedo Saenz - Like him, but I would've already traded him to a contender that needs a bat off the bench.
Jose Valentin - Gone.
Delwyn Young - Keep.
Milton Bradley - Offer him arbitration.
Jose Cruz - Gone.
J.D. Drew - Keep.
Mike Edwards - (The 40-man has him as an outfielder. I thought the CW was he's a butcher out there.) Gone. He's not young, turning 29 in November.
Ricky Ledee - Keep, as the top reserve outfielder.
Jason Repko - Keep, as a potential 5th outfielder.
Cody Ross - Gone.
Jayson Werth - Keep, but don't rely on his health.
That's the problem with Perez, in that he's not good enough to push Kent aside. (Not many are.) But his defense at third, at the moment, is a liability, IMO. So, you've got a fine bat that you can't fully utilize.
Assume we lose Weaver ($8.5 mil), Valentin ($3.5 mil), Green ($10 mil), Dreifort ($13 mil), Alvarez ($2 mil), and we trade Bradley for prospects ($2.5 mil). That's $39.5 mil, but a lot of that goes to salary increases. The following sums are guesses, likely terrible guesses. We then sign Saenz for a $2 mil upgrade, Furcal for $8 mil, Giles for $10 mil, and Dunn ends up with a $10 mil contract. Then it seems we could do this. However, that's assuming we go with nothing new in the bullpen or rotation. I'm also assuming we pick up Dessens' option.
I would definitely start him at third for every game for the rest of the year. That would give us a better picture as to how good a hitter he is, how good a third baseman he might be and how much trade value he has.
Assuming you're somewhere close, how far does that put us from 100 mil?
i wasn't addressed about this but i would keep dessens, he's a good reliever and can spot start.
gagne,sanchez,dessens,broxton,brazoban,kuo,and either schmoll or osoria, the other as a callup when or if an injury.
upgrade weaver's spot in the rotation, a penny type, this is key, cause i don't think billingsley will be ready.
I agree that Billingsly won't be ready, but how do you upgrade Weaver's spot in the rotation without spending much more than you want to?
SS- Furcal- 8.5 mil (4yrs 34 mil)
LF- Giles- 8.5 mil (3yrs 25.5 mil)
CF- Drew- 11 mil
RF- Dunn- 8 mil (arby)
2b- Kent- 9 mil
1b- Choi- 1.2 (arby)
3rd- Perez- 350k
C- Navarro-350k
total: 46.9
IMO, a little bit too high.
SPs: http://tinyurl.com/2rvxg
Of note:
Jeff Weaver (Dodgers) - In my opinion, Weaver is the best long-term investment among this year's group of free-agent starting pitchers. ... $32 million over four years wouldn't make him a bargain, but who is going to provide better value? He might stay put in Los Angels, although that would lock the Dodgers into a lot of long-term contracts with starters. Prediction: Blue Jays - four years, $32 million
Matt Morris (Cardinals) ...Prediction: Nationals - four years, $36 million
A.J. Burnett (Marlins) - With Tim Hudson and Chris Carpenter agreeing to multiyear deals, Burnett is clearly the top pitcher on the market...Prediction: Yankees - five years, $65 million
Jarrod Washburn (Angels) - ...Prediction: White Sox - four years, $28 million
Esteban Loaiza (Nationals) - Prediction: Dodgers - two years, $9 million
OFs http://tinyurl.com/csczk
Johnny Damon (Red Sox) ...Prediction: Red Sox - five years, $47.5 million
Brian Giles (Padres) ...Prediction: Astros - two years, $18 million
Matt Lawton (Cubs) ...Prediction: Cubs - two years, $12 million
Adam Dunn is making $4.6 million, and I believe the arbitration numbers thrown around are between $9 and 11 million.
i know, its a lot to do, but im not comfortable with odalis or lowe.
In my ideal scenario, Bradley makes some sort of bury-the-hatchet remark to the media re: Kent, and then DePo/McCourt congratulate with him with something like a 3 yr/9 mil deal (random number I'm throwing out). However, I think McCourt is genuinely miffed at Milton (the only accurate thing I believe we can infer from Plaschke's column), so ownership may kill this idea. However, I think DePo's real opinions are something of a cipher, as they always are.
What I'd like to know if if Gurnick's information that Milton is probably done as a Dodger comes from just players, or if he has a source from the front office/ownership.
WWSH
We have a good year for arbitration, assuming Bradley is traded. He, Choi, Phillips, and Carrara are all eligible, and if they aren't traded, the latter 2 can be non tendered
southernguide.tv
why?
If you can "upgrade" from Weaver by trading Izturis, Repko and Phillips, I think we need to get rid of DePo today and move you into that chair.
Jackson is another story, but as of today his trade value is still pretty low also.
Do you have a name in mind for this pitcher to replace Weaver?
I would also imagine that the LA Times will be cheerleading for DePo to be among those looking to throw crazy amounts of money at those guys and if we don't sign them, they will again throw a temper tantrum, and Weaver will go down in history as a homegrown, All-American heart-and-soul-boy who Dodgers management stupidly let leave town. (His temper tantrums will of course be forgotten, only the good memories are the ones that count).
That said, Weaver is the pitcher I'd most like among him, Lowe, and Perez, but I think he'll be gone.
Wilson Alvarez - will retire
Yhency Brazoban - Keep
Jonathan Broxton - Keep
Giovanni Carrara - Good bye
Elmer Dessens - is useful as a spot starter, would keep for under $1 million
Darren Dreifort - will retire
Eric Gagne - Keep
Joel Hanrahan - isn't DONE as a prospect (only 22-23 years old), but won't be protected
D.J. Houlton - Keep, he could be a solid #5
Edwin Jackson - Keep, his value is too low to trade him
Ryan Ketchner - will not be protected, will probably stay with the Dodgers
Derek Lowe - trade him if Weaver stays, durable, but nothing special. A #3 starter
Franquelis Osoria - Keep, good control, groundball pitcher
Brad Penny - Keep
Odalis Perez - Keep, can be very good when healthy
Duaner Sanchez - Keep, agree I'd also listen to offers for Sanchez
Steve Schmoll - Keep
Derek Thompson - won't be protected, because of TJ surgery will stay with the Dodgers
Jeff Weaver - offer him arb, will probably leave as a FA
Kelly Wunsch - Keep for 1/2 Million, why not? Solid LOOGY
Paul Bako- Gone
Russell Martin- Will share catching job with Navarro
Dioner Navarro - Will share catching job with Martin
Jason Phillips - Goodbye Mr. Clutch. Nontender
Mike Rose - Bye
Willy Aybar - Keep, could replace Antonio Perez, plays better defense
Hee-Seop Choi - Keep, but don't hand him the 1B job, bring in solid backup
Cesar Izturis - Keep, his value is too low right now
Jeff Kent - listen to offers, he could bring in a lot of talent.
Antonio Perez - Keep if Tracy is gone, otherwise trade him to a team that will play him, Aybar could replace him
Oscar Robles - Keep....as a backuo
Olmedo Saenz - Probably won't retire like he said he would, would get larger offers with more playing team from a team in the AL
Jose Valentin - Bye
Delwyn Young - should spend another year in the minors, what position will he play?
Milton Bradley - offer him arb. and keep him! Otherwise, try to trade him for Brad Wilkerson (Bowden is dumb)
Jose Cruz - Bye
J.D. Drew - Keep
Mike Edwards - Bye
Ricky Ledee - Keep, very solid backup
Jason Repko - Keep, can sort of play defense and pinch run
Cody Ross - Bye, someone will probably claim him
Jayson Werth - Keep...as a backup
Offseason Questions:
1. Will Bradley/Kent be back?
2. Who will play 3B?
3. Who is the 1st baseman?
4. Will Weaver be back?
5. Will Lowe or Perez be traded?
6. Who will be the Dodgers starting LF in 2006?
Answers
1. Bradley: No, will be traded, Kent: Yes
2. ???
3. Choi
4. No
5. No
6. Not Werth, Depo will make a trade for a LF
Depo must improve the bullpen this offseason. Look at what the Padres did last offseason.. Chris Hammond, Rudy Seanez...and picking up Quantrill half way through the year. Their bullpen is solid.
Now you're talking a prospect plus Bradley plus one of those three guys, instead of all three of those guys. That's a very different deal.
Just out of curiosity, who are we comparing with Weaver? Names please.
http://interface.audiovideoweb.com/gplnk/690
those are worse than lowe's career stats.
loaiza's having a career year this season, but his career stats are terrible.
SS Furcal
CF J.Jones
RF Drew
LF Dunn
2B Kent
1B Choi or a FA
3B Robles or Perez
C Navarro
P Lowe
Earlier this year, there was some talk about the Dodgers taking lots of pitches, getting the opposing starter pitch counts up and feasting on middle relief. (Obviously, this was much earlier.) I am not sure how much driving up opponents' pitch count in itself actually matters for winning, but I was curious about difference between hitters in their "pitch absorption," so I did some looking and spreadsheeting to see who on the Dodgers makes opposing pitchers inefficient.
That it makes the going tough for opposing pitchers is one benefit of having lots of high OBP guys in the lineup, more people on base, more plate appearances, more likely to get shots at the worst the opposition has to offer (tired starters and middle relievers). But there are also guys like Jeff Reboulet in 2001. He got on base alright, but his exceptional pitch absorption was primarily due to fouling off strike three several times before going down. He averaged 4.48 pitches per PA that year to lead all players with at least 200 at bats, edging out Rickey Henderson for the title.
Without looking too closely, folks who have high P/PA numbers do tend to have them year after year. Bobby Abreu is consistently above 4, so was Ricky Henderson. Not surprisingly, these guys also have high OBP, but again, just glancing at the leaders, it seems that P/PA and OBP are actually different. For example, Barry Bonds, even as his on base numbers went through the roof in 2004 averaged fewer than 4 pitches per PA. It would take more work then I want to do to find out if the apparent independence of these measures is consistent or random noise, but the differences appear to be real.
Getting on base is valuable for scoring runs, but for pitch absorption, its value is that an out has been saved, requiring more pitches. If we imagine that one batter will make every plate appearance in a game, and the batter has, for example, an on-base percentage of .333, it will take on average about 40.5 plate appearances for the pitcher to get 27 outs (PA/27). In 2004, it would have taken almost 69 plate appearances for Bonds to make 27 outs. Multiplying the expected plate appearances by the average p/pa for the batter yields the number of pitches it would take to get that batter out 27 times (P/27). This overstates the number of pitches slightly (in the case of the Dodgers 152 expected to 144 actual) primarily because some batters make out after reaching base and so don't gain another PA. It also could be because not all games have 27 outs.
Dividing the PA/27 by the number of spots in the lineup gives an estimate of that player's contribution to the opponent's pitch count, without consideration of batting order. So by this estimate, Robles has contributed four more pitches to the opposing pitchers' pitch count than Izturis per game. This doesn't seem like much to me, though the difference is probably slightly greater when the leadoff spot is at stake.
Perez does not have the highest OBP of the 2005 Dodgers (.384 to Drew's .412) nor the highest P/PA (4.23 to Werth's 4.56) but he has had the most pitch absorption power.
Werth's 4.56 pitches/PA is only slightly above his 4.43 career average. Valentin also has a history of seeing lots of pitches, though his 2005 is a bit more of an aberration from his career average of 3.94.
Note that in his glorious summer of 2001 Jeff Reboulet forced pitches out of Dodger opponents at a higher rate than any of this year's Dodgers.
Player OBP P/PA P/27 Divided By 9
Perez. .384 4.23 185 20.6
Werth .327 4.56 183 20.3
Vlntin .346 4.44 183 20.3
Drew. .412 3.88 178 19.8
Rbles. .354 4.23 177 19.7
Choi. . .340 3.95 162 18.0
Nvrro .393 3.65 162 18.0
Saenz .344 3.84 158 17.6
Kent . .376 3.60 156 17.2
Ledee .348 3.65 151 16.8
Brdley .350 3.59 149 16.6
Repko .285 3.95 149 16.6
Cruz.. .325 3.70 148 16.4
Iztris. .302 3.64 141 15.7
Edwds .301 3.59 139 15.4
Phllps .293 3.52 134 14.9
Grabs .228 3.59 126 14.0
Team Avg .327 3.79 152 16.9
Actual Dodgers P/Game 144
For Comparison
..............P/27 Divided by 9
Abreu... 05 201 22.4
Dunn... 05 189 21.0
Dellucci 05 188 20.9
Giambi. 05 200 22.3
Bonds.. 04 270 30.0
Reboulet 01 191 21.2
Sorry about the columns. It's tough to get them straight.
Sanchez - It's always fun to make other GMs overpay for talent you picked up on the cheap.
Houlton - Ibid.
A. Perez
Robles
Who else?
Also J. Jones? Bleh. I'd much rather have Milton, and if we're going to get rid of him, we'd do much better to move Drew to CF and sign Giles to play RF.
I'm really starting to dig this character stuff. You don't have to make any sense, and it can't be contradicted.
Since it's being done in hotel fountains, I assume he does this on road trips.
Maybe his character is acceptable on homestands and we can sign him just for home games.
Other than Penny, I'd rather get rid of any starting pitcher on the current staff than Houlton. I think he's shown a lot more than anyone else with far fewer results. And he works cheap!
Penny
Lowe
Perez
Houlton
Jackson
Poor man's Weaver is right. Look at the difference in what they'll earn next year.
pitching is mainly what wins games and we need another brad penny in that rotation.
i wish i could clone penny.
Houlton: 4.42 ERA, 1.07 HR/9, 2.75 BB/9, 6.95 K/9, .60 HBP/9, 5.79 IP/S
Weaver: 4.41 ERA, 1.40 HR/9, 1.87 BB/9, 6.02 K/9, .67 HBP/9, 6.42 IP/S
Houlton walks more batters, but Ks more and gives up fewer HRs. Their HBPs are surprisingly close (I only include that because Weaver hits so many). Their ERAs are practically identical. The biggest difference is the IP per start, although Houlton has been much better since he's limited pitches in the 1st
this is based on what? one big league start? at jacksonville, his walk rate was 2.61/9IP
What about Willy Aybar at 3rd. Seeing how successful Navarro has been, I would think that Aybar could but up a 260/340/400 line. The big plus from him is excellent defense. Are there anyother decent options at 3rd in the FA market? I would think that Aybar could match most of them offensively, while being cheaper and providing better defense.
I would like to see this infield:
1B: Kent
2B: Perez
3B: Aybar
SS: Robles
I would trade one of either saenz or choi (probably saenz because you could get more for him). I would also trade izturis to who ever looses the rafael furcal sweepstakes. I wouldnt mind signing Garciaparra to a 1 year deal to play SS. I think the infield defense would be upgraded in this alignment. While we loose some at shortstop (with either robles or garciaparra), we would gain at 3B,2B, and 1B. As long as the outfield is productive offensively, i think it would work.
Are Barry Bonds' numbers skewed by the number of intentional walks he received? He often would see just four pitches.
Robles will see more pitches because pitchers actually try to get him out and throw the ball over the plate, which he tries to foul off.
Considering the only reason Houlton is even on the roster is because of Rule 5, I think you have to disregard the first part of the season. In fact, how about disregarding all of his relief innings and the first 2 or 3 starts (to get his feet wet). What do the stats look like if you do that?
One thing Weaver and Houlton have in common is that their second halves have been a lot better.
IMHO, Houlton has shown a lot, considering his total lack of experience, and he's getting better, even after some teams have seen him twice.
If Jackson can fill the spot vacated by weaver, that means the Dodgers wont have to get involved in the FA market for pitchers, which is a good thing. If pitching is overvalued, shouldnt you be putting your money in hitters?
Webb has thrown 111 pitches, so it will be time for the crack AZ bullpen, with its 6.36 ERA.
Giants lead the Mets 2-1 in the 7th.
yes his w/9 in jacksonville has been fine, but he was terrible in las vegas, and i do consider the pcl being a hitter freindly league, but also practicly all of his appearances in the big leagues he's had control problems.
i'm not saying jackson s___ks, i'm just saying another year in the minors would be good for him, no need to rush him, heck if you say jackson is ready then billingsley is certainly ready, i don't think either one of them are yet.
billingsley is definately a better prospect then jackson.
April - In limited action (8-2/3 IP), befitting a Rule 5 rookie, Holton compiles an ERA of 2.08 despite allowing a BAA of .389.
May - Growing pains. 12.96 ERA in 8-1/3 IP.
June - Into the rotation. With an ERA of 4.30 in 29-1/3 IP (5 GS), he compiles a record of 4-1.
July - 0-3 with a 6.20 ERA. He pitches in five games, four starts, for 24-2/3 IP.
August - Bad luck. 0-3 in four GS (25-1/3 IP) , although he has a quality ERA (2.49) and BAA (.187).
And he's shown a real ability to get out of jams (especially for a younger pitcher).
I look forward to seeing him as one of our 5 starters next year.
and no, i consider billingsley a better prospect than jackson but i do consider both capable of pitching in the bigs right now. I dont think we are rushing edwin, this is where he should be.
Nomah might have his hands full getting a decent offer this fall. He might like to come home to play and it wouldn't surprise me to see DePo make him an offer for one year. He couldn't be much less productive than Valentin.
same. but i am goign to be watching the dodgers tonight because of young edwin.
3B Perez (LaRoche waiting in the wings, Perez moves to 2B in 2007)
CF Bradley (Drew if Bradley traded)
RF Drew (Giles if Bradley traded)
2B Kent
LF Giles (? Dunn Lawton)
1B Choi
SS JtD
C Navarro/Martin
Rotation
Penny
Lowe
FA/surprise trade acquisition
Houlton
Jackson
Help coming from minors
i never heard that at all. could i get a link to back that up please.
1b: Dunn (Jackson, Werth, Navarro, Brazoban *rather give up someone like orenduff than jackson but doubt the reds would take that)
2b: Kent
ss: Perez (his original position)
3b: Aybar or Nomar (if we could sign him cheap on a short contract)
c: Martin (I think he is ready now. I really do not see him improving much if we keep him in the minors longer)
Giants win 2-1.
152- I read about it in the LA Times. It might have been in a Tim Brown article.
I definitely wouldn't want Nomar now.
in his last 28IP or something like that, hes given up only 2 ER.
http://tinyurl.com/9od93
Why was the game only 7 innings?
Steve Finley has a 379 OPS in August.
I think what we need to do is follow the model that Beane has laid down this year. Namely bringing in good defensive players, since we got a bunch of young pitchers coming up and they'll need the help.
Here's my lineup:
3b Robles/Perez
SS Furcal
Lf Wilkerson (for Bradley)
2B Kent
CF Drew
RF Giles
1b Loney
C Navarro/Martin(he is ready)
I think you keep Jackson and Houlton in the rotation and Broxton also is given a chance to win a spot in the rotation. If not he goes to the bullpen, drop Carrara and bring in (drumroll please...) Lima he can fill the vet bullpen presence and "character" problems in one shot. Bring up Kuo and resign Wunsch. Also I would trade either Lowe or Perez. More Perez because he is injured too much lately. Also i know i am in the minority but I would have Loney play 1st, i think his glove is already there and his bat is better than most people think.
Geez, Uncle Miltie, don't be so grouchy. We are getting Furcal, Jackson will win 20 and I hear we're negotiating with the Yanks to trade Odalis for the Babe and Mickey M.
The Furcal thing is more of a wish.
I agree with you on Jackson. I am hopeful he has a good start today and works out for next year.
Im a glass half full kinda guy.
I'm sure it has already been posted here but if not here is the link the BA article on our Suns.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/features/050826jax.html
Evidently Depo/White had a plan for filling the outfield with 6 year minor league veterans. Just reading the article makes me giddy about the future, especially the way the players who were on Vero Beach talk about the talent they left behind when they got promoted.
Thanks, Bob, for that good article. The current feud in baseball really has become to some extent a "theological dispute."
WWSH
I know the Dodgers, Giants, DBacks, and Rockies aren't great, but the Padres have to win some games don't they?
SS- Furcal (32 mils 4 years) 8.0 mils
RF- Giles (17 mils 2 years) 8.5 mils
CF- Drew- (44 mils 4 years) 11 mils
LF- Dunn- (8 mils 1 year) 8 mils
2b- Kent (8.5 mils 1 year) 8.5 mils
1b- Choi- (1 mils 1 year) 1.0 mils
3rd- Perez- (800K 1 year) 800K
C- Navarro- (500K 1 year) 500K
Lineup: 46.3 mils
Bench: 5.6 mils
C- Martin- (350K)
1b- Saenz- (1.5 mils)
LF- Ledee- (1.5 mils)
RF- Werth- (750K)
LF- Cruz- (1 mils)
SS- Robles- (600K)
Pitching Staff: (40 mils)
#1 Penny- (8 mils)
#2. Lowe- (9 mils)
#3. Perez- (10 mils)
#4. Houlton- (500K)
#5. Billingsley- (315K)
#6. Dessens- (1.5 mils)
#7. Sanchez- (500K)
#8. Gagne- (9 mils)
#9 Wunsch- (500K)
#10. Brazoban- (500K)
#11. Kuo- (315K)
Thats a payroll of 92 mils. Looks doable to me.
Biggio
Berkman
Ensberg
Lane
Burke
Everett
Ausmus
Oswalt
vs
A Perez
Robles
Kent
Phillips
Werth
Cruz
Navarro
Valentin
Jackson
I hope I don't walk outside and find out that everyone has died of plague or something.
3B Perez
SS Robles
2B Kent
1B Phillips
CF Werth
RF Cruz
C Navarro
LF Valentin
P Jackson
vs
CF Taveras
2B Biggio
1B Berkman
3B Ensberg
RF Lane
LF Burke
SS Everett
C Ausmus
P Oswalt
200 We have Edwards back, I guess Tracy didn't mind
By the way Bob, was Jackson's first (and only) hit in the majors an infield single? For some reason, that's what I remember.
In the words of Chandler Bing: "Oh-My-God!"
I'm going to dinner.
great sequence to ensberg. that change was a beauty!
anyone think the gun is slow? jacksons topping out at 92 on the UPN gun.
Nice hit antonio!
http://www.linkmeister.com/blog/archives/001529.html
And once again FSNW2 isn't showing me the game.
Oswalt usually throws 94-95
Phillips and Novarro both hitting in the same inning? Goodness!
And I'm also surprised Navarro swung on 2-0 as well.
why? you are up to hit to drive the ball, what if that first pitch is the only good pitch you get to hit?
Still 5 runs cant complain.
But the smartness in the at bats started to lack after we scored those 1st 3 runs.
254- Perez swung at strikes.
Valentin is horrible. Is Ledee's hammy THAT bad?
should have scored 7 runs if not 8.
jackson got up to 94 to strike out jason kendall, i mean chris burke.
also, i dont agree with that approach at the plate. you dont go up to the plate looking to walk. you go up there looking for one pitch to drive, and if you dont get it, then you can walk. theres a difference. and in a bases loaded situation, already up by 4 and wanting to put the nail in the coffin, if you recognize a pitch you want to drive, go for it.
Completely off topic, but this is driving me crazy: what's the fanfare music that plays when the Dodgers take the field? (the classical piece)
8 pitch inning for Oswalt. JP/kent look like crap, and Werth goes hacking.
I'm wondering if both are off the roids, and thats why? Especially Valentin.
The Dodgers offense is back!
Ugh...balk
at this pace he won't last more than 1 more inning, maybe start the 6th, but if he gets into any trouble he's gone.
Not that there's anything wrong with that....
The NY Post is part of Murdoch's media empire and Koufax refused to have anything to do with him after that.
0-1 change to biggio had him swigning through it. and the same on the 0-2 pitch for the K.
Very impressed even if the Astros arent a great offensive club.
The pitches are a little high, but I'm just happy to see him K'ing people.
5.5 out if the Rox can hold on still leaves a glimmer of hope.
Jackson needs to be in the majors for good. Enough with Double A, and keep him out of Vegas at all costs. Things are not always going to go as well as they have for him tonight, and there may be some rough sailing in his first full MLB season, but Jackson needs to make his mistakes and his adjustmenst at THIS level. We can't baby the kids forever.
Valentin Prediction: Not a productive out
Harville has some hops
http://tinyurl.com/7ov4o
We were a smaller group then and the invites were hard to come by. You had to know a secret handshake and all that.
330. Beating Clemens is a tough order. The Rocket has been virtually unbeatable on the road.
Jeff Gillooly and Shane Stant were the bad guys in the Kerrigan incident.
Gillooly is now Jeff Stone.
I really shouldn't know stuff like this. I feel like I need a shower.
Don't walk guys Edwin!
Take him out
Werth takes zig zag routes...he's not a CF
As for Werth, he's learning to play center. He may get better. And it may be his position next year, although I suppose it could be Drew's.
6k's against 1bb was good.
Giving up a 3 run bomb to some scrub named Chris Burke is a Grabowki Principle.
#1: Bradley, Milton (CF $4.00 million)
#2: Brazoban, Yhency (RP $0.35 million)
#3: Broxton, Jonathan (RP $0.32 million)
#4: Choi, Hee-Seop (1B $1.25 million)
#5: Dessens, Elmer (RP $1.30 million)
#6: Drew, J.D. (RF $11.00 million)
#7: Gagne, Eric (RP $10.00 million)
#8: Houlton, Dennis (SP $0.33 million)
#9: Izturis, Cesar (SS $3.10 million)
#10: Kent, Jeff (2B $9.00 million)
#11: Ledee, Ricky (OF $1.50 million)
#12: Lowe, Derek (SP $9.00 million)
#13: Navarro, Dioner (C $0.32 million)
#14: Penny, Brad (SP $5.50 million)
#15: Perez, Antonio (2B/3B $0.34 million)
#16: Perez, Odalis (SP $8.00 million)
#17: Phillips, Jason (C $1.15 million)
#18: Robles, Oscar (2B/SS $0.34 million)
#19: Sanchez, Duaner (RP $0.40 million)
#20: Schmoll, Steve (RP $0.34 million)
#21: Werth, Jayson (OF $0.40 million)
#22: X: Left Fielder (LF $0.00 million)
#23: X: Starting Pitcher (SP $0.00 million)
#24: X: Third Baseman (3B $0.00 million)
The salary is $68.29 million + $7.55 million for benefits (from Hardball Dollars), for a grand total of $75.84 million dollars.
The total this season will be around $97 million, so estimating a similar total next season leaves $21 million available.
The in-house options are as follows:
LF: Jayson Werth with Jason Repko taking over as the 5th outfielder.
SP: Edwin Jackson with a deep AAA pitching staff to fill holes due to injuries.
3B: Willy Aybar, Antonio Perez, or Oscar Robles.
I expect DePodesta to go hard after Hideki Matsui or Brian Giles to play LF. That would tie up about $9 - $10 million, leaving $11 - $12 million available.
I'm currently leaning towards packaging Hee Seop Choi and others up for Adam Dunn. I'm hoping that the price will be more reasonable in the offseason. Perhaps Hee Seop Choi, Justin Orenduff, and Jose Diaz? Dunn would utilize $8 - $10 million of the remaining budget through arbitration.
Then, next year my ideal lineup would be as follows, along with off-the-cuff 2006 projections:
Antonio Perez (3B) .275/.345/.385 (.730 OPS)
Milton Bradley (CF) .285/.345/.485 (.830 OPS)
J.D. Drew (RF) .285/.410/.515 (.925 OPS)
Jeff Kent (2B) .280/.365/.490 (.855 OPS)
Brian Giles (LF) .285/.400/.480 (.880 OPS)
Adam Dunn (1B) .245/.375/.550 (.925 OPS)
Dioner Navarro (C) .275/.365/.355 (.720 OPS)
Cesar Izturis (SS) .280/.320/.360 (.680 OPS)
Bench:
OF: Jayson Werth
OF: Ricky Ledee
IF: Oscar Robles
IF: Willy Aybar
1B: ???
C: Jason Phillips
I'm pretty confident this lineup would be able to handle Izturis' sub-.700 OPS. It also has great depth to cover for injuries.
Of course, that still leaves us with a pitching rotation of:
Brad Penny
Odalis Perez
Derek Lowe
DJ Houlton
Edwin Jackson
One suggestion would be to try to convert Sanchez back into a starter now that he's harnessing a quality offspeed pitch. Assuming Gagne is healthy, the bullpen should be fine with or without Sanchez.
scrub=Astros top prostect having a mediocre rookie season
whoa a dessens spotting, i guess i did figure out tracy, when the dodgers recalled osoria i thought to myself, could it be because they are planning to use dessens in late innings instead of when a starter gets pulled before or during the 5th inning.
osoria is probably our new long reliever.
If I was Ashby, I'd be enjoying my family and playing golf every morning.
Rather than riding around on the AAA team bus hoping for another shot at the Bigs.
Those arent good numbers for an outfield prospect.
Of course, the first couple of innings in tomorrows Dodger game will be broadcast with 1955 technology, so I'll be watching that too.
If that can get him going, then hopefully good things will come.
Rockies are changing pitchers. From somebody to somebody else. I think it's Scott Dohmann. But he could be coming out.....
Kent with a Shawn Green home run.
352- from all indications, it looks like Bradley (unfortunately) won't be back. I'd rather get rid of Kent.
If its for defense, the guy won a GG like 2 years ago. He cant be worse than Repko or Edwards out there?
And Valentin and AP at 3rd are both equally bad.
Looks like Tracy watched too much LLWS and thought he had to get all of his players in the game, or else we'd have to forfeit.
Then again--arms are so fickle-especially for the Dodgers.
tracy allways has to have a long reliever that never pitches other than long relief.
remember never seeing dessens.
long relief = when a starter is pulled during the 5th inning or befre.
Who are these men who have taken over the Rockies pitchers bodies?
Sorry to those in acceptance, this was for those in denial.
Is this guy off the roids?
anyways i'm glad to see dessens in late innings, he has been our best reliever so far this season, and surprisingly sanchez has been our 2nd best.
that changeup that sanchez has developed/added might just make him a good reliever after all.
Fearing, I don't see the reason "why" in the idea to send any of the young pitchers to Las Vegas. Because of the extremes of the park,weather, league compared to dodger stadium you are not going to get a true read on their abilities. Unless you want to run them through some type of pitchers boot camp before they come up???? Vegas as a minor league stop is a bad idea unless they can come up with a retractable roof.
i guess i don't know my terms, dessens was used ONLY when the starters were pulled during the 5th inning or before and never in late innings, to me thats what a long reliever is.
He's warming up, although not very hard.
Cortes got the first two batters.
well maybe we can hype the hitters and use them as trade bait.
Four straight road wins for the Rox!
Rox 4, Pads 2
He can't do that tonight! It's Viva Los Dodgers Night!
But I agree, that really killed us. Especially 2 against the Rockies at home, at least they're hot against the Padres as well
The only way I see us making a legit move is if we win 6-8 games in a row. But that seems doubtful
Tiki torches at twilight,
Hula girls at the bar,
All the guys from the office,
Are throwing up their cars.
Get to cooking a roast pig,
Like it's done in the book,
Say hello to your sweetie,
With a casual look.
Swinging deals and eating meals,
Is all within the norm,
Put away the axes,
And pay those taxes.
Let's all get normal at the lu'au.
"The number of one-run games since 2001, and the won-lost record in those games is pretty impressive," Tracy said. "Mr. [Eric] Gagne obviously has a little something to do with that, too. Because I feel like that is, personally, somewhat of a testament to a manager, because that's where your resolve gets tested. Four-run game, five-run game, what kind of resolve gets tested there?"
"It's very flattering, if you get right down to that," Tracy said. "If young players weren't developing, [and] the performance on the field was completely lackluster, [if] you didn't see passion, you didn't see energy, then that falls into my boat. And that's something that I would expect to be completely held accountable for, 100 percent.
"But as I was alluding to in here yesterday, I think last night's game is another indication of it. We have played with whatever lineup, with whatever group of names from one day to the next, [and] over the course of the five years I've been here, I get everything they've got, every single day -- with the exception of probably a couple, and what ballclub doesn't go through that?"
"I laud my players, and I told them that, way back, playing in Philadelphia," Tracy said. "The effort that they have given from day to day is noteworthy because, believe me ... if you go back and you research some of those lineups that we had out on the field ... I think it'll tell you an awful lot about the character that these players have displayed between the lines, in going out there and giving you every single thing they've got."
Not relly the same thing, but at least he decided to say something
While far from a fluent speaker like Villaraigosa, McCourt did his best, briefly remarking in Spanish, "Welcome, friends. My house is your house."
Someone should tell the reporter that Antonio Villaraigosa isn't fluent in Spanish either.
Now it can be told. Dino's roamed the earth alongside man!
http://tinyurl.com/b6pmq
-talking about cesar and the DL
LOL
Anyone interested in Bellhorn? He was pretty good lst year and is better than Edwards and Valentin in my opinion. Walks a lot (49 in 293 ABs), has some nice doubles power(20, plus 7 homers), and makes Dunn look like Robles with his Ks (an awful 109). Even if he hit like Izzy average wise, at least he takes pitches (4.23 per PA) and walks, plus he's cheap (FA on Tuesday). I like him as backup 3B over Valentin at the very least.
In Sunday's Times:
Character and team chemistry have been strong themes recently under Dodger owner Frank McCourt, especially in light of several embarrassing incidents involving players. He pointed to the '55 team as embodying the qualities he wants in his current Dodgers.
"It's important to celebrate not just winning, but a type of winning we can respect," McCourt said. "This is a team we can all relate to. They had that thing called character. This is a team worthy of this weekend's celebration."
Yeah, they were all perfect. They all loved each other.
Hah!
If that doesn't work out, he's got next spring.
is he admitting that he doesn't know how to put a lineup together?
i can never figure out what the hell he's saying.
anyways he's a goofball, just more stupid babble from the worst manager i've ever seen.
he answers his own questions with more questions, this guy is an embarrasement to the dodger organization, who hired him in the first place, dan evans.
i'll be the first to write a big thank you to whomever fires his @$$.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.