Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
This is a snapshot of the Dodgers, with the understanding that further changes are to come.
First Base
Status: Solid
As it stands, we have the return of the Hee Seop Choi/Olmedo Saenz combo, which despite being sat upon by Jason Phillips, lifted the Dodgers to No. 6 in the National League in OPS at first base in 2005. The teams ahead of the Dodgers at first base last season: Chicago (Derrek Lee), St. Louis (Albert Pujols), Colorado (Todd Helton and Coors Field), Arizona (Chad Tracy and Tony Clark (?!)) and Florida (Carlos Delgado). The Dodgers got 31 home runs at the position, and while Saenz is likely to decline from his 2005 totals, the much younger Choi is likely to improve. As a backup, you have Jeff Kent, which ain't bad. It's unlikely and somewhat irrational to even speak of it, but James Loney could send Choi back to the trading block were he to crush Choi in Spring Training.
Second Base
Status: Solid to exceptional
Jeff Kent surprised by improving from age 36 to age 37, striking one blow against the myth that free agent signees need an adjustment period, but we should prepare for some kind of regression after his 38th birthday in March. If Kent somehow ends up at first base, that position wouldn't suffer, but the Dodgers would then try to make up Kent's .800-.900 OPS at second base with Willy Aybar, or, if Andy LaRoche speeds to the majors at third base, day-old acquisition Bill Mueller.
Shortstop
Status: Solid to Exceptional
It's $13 million Rafael Furcal's infield now, and we just build around it. As a shortstop, he's at or near the top of the league - by being an above-average fielder for his position and an average hitter when you throw position out of the equation. Atlanta, with Furcal as its leadoff hitter in 2005, was third in the league in leadoff OPS. Oscar Robles is the incumbent backup, with Cesar Izturis entering the picture in the summer and a rush to 21-year-old Joel Guzman an emergency option should calamity strike.
Third Base
Status: Solid
The question upon deeper examination is what effect Dodger Stadium, whose symmetrical, easily patrolled outfield reduces doubles and triples, will have on Bill Mueller, whose slugging percentage depends greatly on doubles. My hunch - and I'll freely admit that's all it is - is that the effect will not be significant, and that Mueller should hold down the position. But if you need something else to worry about, Mueller was fourth in the American League in 2005 in grounding into double plays (22). Willy Aybar, who himself hit eight doubles in 86 major-league at-bats last season, should get a chance to spot start and provide a spark off the bench.
Outfield
Status: Man down
J.D. Drew is not Kirk Gibson, but he's an exceptional hitter (1.006 and .931 OPS the past two seasons) who, going by his history, you should expect to play in more games in 2006. If you combine Jose Cruz, Jr., Ricky Ledee, Jayson Werth (who might be on the disabled list in April) and minor leaguers Delwyn Young and Andre Ethier), you have a decent shot at coming away with a decent third outfielder. But without a solid addition out there on the grass, the Dodgers are stretched thin as far as finding a prince to stand beside King Drew. Look for someone to sign up in the next week, and hope for the best. Jason Repko figures to return as a backup, while Joel Guzman may train in right field in 2006 at Las Vegas.
Catcher
Status: Solid
Dioner Navarro won't turn 22 until February, but he already has a career .751 OPS in 206 plate appearances. A .751 OPS would have put the Dodgers sixth in the National League at catcher in 2005. Navarro will be tested by his first full season in the majors, but he is also poised for improvement at the outset. Catching instructor Sandy Alomar, Jr. will sit next to him while the Dodgers bat and even don the tools of ignorance once a week himself - apparently that's part of his coaching agreement - while Russell Martin, 359 days older than Navarro, will prepare in Las Vegas for his challenge to the incumbent. Jason Phillips, we somewhat knew ye ...
Starting Pitcher
Status: Picture Rodney Dangerfield pulling at his necktie
If no changes were made, the rotation would lead off with Brad Penny, Derek Lowe, and Odalis Perez, three pitchers capable of stringing together four starts in a row at an ERA of 1.50 and then following them with four starts at an ERA of 5.50. Next, you have D.J. Houlton, who could conceviably parlay his 2005 learning experience and 6.3 strikeouts per nine innings into a serviceable year at age 26. And coming up from the 22-and-younger crowd, there's Edwin Jackson (still that young), Chad Billingsley and Jonathan Broxton, one of whom could be probably be counted on to at least match Houlton's '05. The Dodger rotation remains anomalous to the great tradition here, but, um, at least it's not a team of five Scott Ericksons.
Bullpen
Status: Solid to exceptional
The choice above depends on how quickly Eric Gagne returns to being Eric Gagne. Assuming he becomes the anchor again, the right-handed options behind him are plentiful, with Yhency Brazoban (whom many think has solved his 2005 problems in winter ball), Duaner Sanchez, Franquelis Osoria and in all likelihood, Jonathan Broxton. Steve Schmoll could also be considered a favorite to win a bullpen spot in March, though 22 walks vs. 29 strikeouts in 46 2/3 innings last season should be considered a serious warning sign. From the left side, Hong-Chih Kuo will be given every chance to pitch 'til he drops - and hey, speaking of injury-riddled prospects, any of you willing to place a longshot bet on Greg Miller? Look for at least one TBD veteran journeyman to provide some competition for this group.
Overall Assessment
Status: Solid
What does solid mean in this context? It means that the Dodgers have a NL West title contender with the ability to improve between now and April, let alone between April and September. It's too soon to make any worthwhile predictions for 2006 (I'm not even much good at making worthwhile predictions the night before), but you can already feel, like a Chavez Ravine version of Derek Smalls, the Dodgers breaking free of their 2005 cocoon of losses. Better late than never.
As for our can't-get-no-respect starting pitching, I don't exactly relish the idea of two of the Jackson/Houlton/Broxton/Billingsley group being in the rotation together. I'd like to see Bills get another year in the minors and a September call-up, and for some reason I see Houlton's value in long relief and spot starts. I'd like to see Weaver accept an arbitration year - Chad can replace him in 2007 - or barring that, a veteran like Tomko could be a good-value signing. As for the fifth spot, I want the ball to be in Jackson's hands until he proves he can't (or can!) cut it at the major league level. I think we've got to figure out what we have in this kid since we've got a good number of pitching prospects coming up the pipe.
As for Broxton, I'm OK with him staying in the pen for now...yet I don't relish the idea of Miller stepping into a 2006 relief role in favor of building up his arm strength in the minors for a shot at a starting role down the road. I can't say why I feel differently about these guys...maybe it's a lefty/righty thing.
Is Wunsch out as Loogy? What is his status?
4 - Wunsch is still an option, I think - but if he has a 2006 contract, I missed it.
I don't want the Dodgers to be a moth.
As per Wunch (above) and Carrara (a question from a comment in recent days):
http://tinyurl.com/buajr
Wun[s]ch, ed.
9 - I sort of think about Paul Lo Duca. It's just an isolated example so it only plays into my hunch, but this is a guy who is basically a doubles hitter, and life as a Dodger didn't hurt him.
2001 - 28 doubles
2002 - 38 doubles
2003 - 34 doubles
2004 - 29 doubles (18 with the Dodgers)
2005 - 23 doubles with Florida
I'd be more worried about Mueller's age than the park effects on doubles. But they say Mueller has good work habits ...
If they had called the movie "Chyrsalis" nobody would have gone to see it.
Because it is a small sample size, it is not concerning.
But seriously, would any of you be interested in Garland? More importantly, would Colletti be interested?
Not sure I would classify Furcal and Mueller as injury proned. Alomar is a back-up/coach so I won't consider him. Furcal has missed significant game time once in his career (2001). Mueller has had some injuries, but not sure I would classify him as injury proned (i.e. Drew who has played more than 135 games once in his career). So far I think Ned has done a good job. I'll wait to give my final assesment until he fills the outfield & SP void.
Not sure how he's going to address the outfield situation. I really don't like Sanders or Lofton. You could take a risk on a player whom I would consider injury proned in Garciaparra, but with an outfield of Garciaparra & Drew we'd be lucky if they played together in 100 games in 06.
As for pitching help...Jon wrote something around Thanksgiving about an innings eater. I like Brett Tomko. With the pitchers available, I would hate to have the Dodgers locked into another overpaid #3 starter. Tomko is cheap, has a solid history at Dodger Stadium, has never had any significant injuries, and will get you 200+ innings per year. I posted analysis around Thanksgiving comparing him to Weaver, and their numbers were very similar...Just an idea as I would hate for the Dodgers to get locked into another $9 million per year contract on the pitchers remaining on the FA market.
Comparing these park factors and the type of players involved (Furcal-fast, Mueller-not so much), I suspect that Dodger Stadium will hurt Furcal only somewhat, but Mueller more so. In other words, Furcal's doubles may well have more to do with his speed, but Mueller may have really benefited from Fenway.
One more note on handedness. Both Furcal and Mueller are switch hitters. Furcal's splits aren't too far apart , but Mueller has a much better split as a lefty -- even with Fenway's help for righties (3 year average OPS: .884 as LHB and .785 as RHB). Given this and his injury concerns, it might make sense to platoon him. Unfortunately Aybar has similar splits and A. Perez is gone, but that's water under the bridge now. Maybe when Laroche is called up he can platoon with Mueller.
Great summary, Jon. But I think everyone here is spitting into the wind if we think that repeated incantations of the stats so clearly recommending a Choi/Saenz platoon will penetrate the skulls of either Mr. Ned, or the bigger-megaphone baseball scribes and radio-talkers. Choi is in their sights, and if Colletti doesn't take him down with one shot, they'll rule this off-season a flop. And Mr. Ned knows it.
Choi needs to hire Sitrick.
Regarding ballpark symmetry: does anyone else ever stop and think how bizarre it is that baseball fields do not have standardized dimensions? Can you imagine, for example, footballs fields ranging from 50 to 150 yards in length, or basketball rims ranging from 5 to 15 feet in height?
And honestly, I think we're past the point of the status of Choi making or breaking the offseason in the eyes of the press. In their eyes, the Dodgers have solved their GM problem, their Bradley problem, their third base problem, improved at shortstop. They still may not love us, but there's no way they call this a flop.
BTW, how do you bold or underline text when commenting? I would have much rather done either than the all caps above.
Hope they put Kuo and Broxton back in the rotation intead of in the bullpen, at least at the beginning of the year in AAA or AA.
Our infield is solid and the best in the West with the best 2nd/SS combo in the NL.
Very worried about the outfield because of the timing. As far as I'm concerned Werth has to be considered a spare part at best because even if he comes back we don't know if his power will come back with him since were dealing with a wrist again. I'm confident that Cruz will give us around an 850 OPS this year. Drew worries me because not only is he rehabbing the shoulder and wrist he is unable to work out so he won't be in peak physical condition by the time he's ready to use his shoulder. His power could suffer and who knows how this will effect his throwing arm. We don't want a popgun in CF. I'd be thrilled if D Young or Guzman could just step in and play LF coming out of ST but I think that is a pipe dream. Sounds like we have offers out to Sanders/Lofton/Nomar and whoever signs 1st will be our starting left fielder. I'd prefer Nomar but he brings his own physical fragility to the table. Sanders looks like he's due for his down year as established by oldbear. Lofton would be serviceble, barely. We might be better off making a deal for an impact outfielder. Or maybe an outfielder that no one realizes is coming off of a solid year like Jay Gibbons and who looks to be able to post an 850 OPS in 2006.
James takes out interleague games, but I'm not sure if ESPN does (I doubt it). So I think James factors are probably more accurate. The 2005 number aren't all that different from the 3 year average, and it's hard to tell if any differences are a result of changes in the park or just the typical randomness that plagues small sample sizes.
My bet is that the changes at DS make it more hitter friendly overall. So the relative disadvantage of 2B and 3B would remain. Should decrease foulouts, and increase all types of hits, walks and strikeouts.
To me, what happens to the pitching staff during this offseason will really color my opinion of him.
I thought that was part of the allure of baseball.
29
Bill James has the latest park effects and your 1/2 right, for one season DS was more neutral for doubles going from a 3 year average of 78 to 87. For triples it went from a 3 year average of 46 to 31.
Hopefully nomar signs for leftfield, sanders wants to many years and he will have a down year, damon is just flat out not worth it and no power, lofton would be good as a backup or pinch hitter only.
Laroche platooning with choi at 1b mid season is my prediction, either that or laroche platooning with mueller and guzman platooning with choi mid season.
I agree with most of what you said, although in Ned's defense, his options with respect to the pitching staff don't seem very attractive. Like you said: either sign someone to a ridiculous contract or gut the farm system. The other option is to rely on the players already on the roster, which doesn't look all that great either.
Yeah, I know baseball asymmetry is generally accepted as part of the quirkiness and "allure" of baseball. But it's still pretty weird when you think about it.
Regarding the outfield, you only offer him one solution and you acknowledge that he tried to get him.
Regarding pitching, like you said, we'll see.
My point is, your ambivalence isn't much different from other people's "being really happy," except that those other people are happy with what he's done so far. I don't know how many people would be really happy with him if he considered his work done.
Of course, there are those who are just happy he hasn't torn up the farm system.
Maybe this is a two-fold pr strategy. Please the mainstream types by the stuff Jon mentioned, jettison Bradley, sign Mueller etc. At the same time, scare the bejesus out of us with rumored Snow, Soriano, Lofton flirtations, prospect deals that don't happen.
That way he gets credit from one group for the things he did do, and from the other group for the things he didn't do.
That'd be nice. Forgive the insanity. I haven't slept much lately.
Also what would the WSox want for Garland?
Mueller .295/.369/.430
Furcal .284/.348/.429
--------------------
Nomar .283/.320/.452
Damon .316/.366/.439
Lofton .335/.392/.420
I think a bigger advantage that ned has vs depo is that the position player prospects are closer to being ready, guzman and laroche could step in this season instead of AAAA guys like repko,edwards,myrow.
Millwood: K/9 - 6.84, BB/9 - 2.44, VORP - 52.3, IP_GS - 6.4
Washburn: K/9 - 4.77, BB/9 - 2.59, VORP - 48.8, IP_GS - 6.1
Weaver: K/9 - 6.31, BB/9 - 1.73, VORP - 28.4, IP_GS - 6.6
Other "options":
Garland: K/9 - 4.68, BB/9 - 1.91, VORP - 50.1, IP_GS - 6.9
Contreras: K/9 - 6.77, BB/9 - 3.30, VORP - 41.5, IP_GS - 6.4
Houlton: K/9 - 6.28, BB/9 - 3.63, VORP - 1.0, IP_GS - 5.5
[Small Sample Size Warning!]
E. Jackson: K/9 - 4.08, BB/9 - 5.34, VORP - -4.2, IP_GS - 4.4
What OF prospects do we have that would make a 5yr Damon offer seem soo horrible?
What has Damon done that makes him attractive? His career OPS is less than Cruz Jr.'s.
46
Ned said soon after being hired that he was moving away from an emphasis on power to an emphasis on speed and athleticism.
I'd be more worried if we didn't have Penny/Lowe/OP as the 1st 3 starters. All were trying to do is fill in the 4th and 5th starters until Billingsly is ready. We don't need to spring big money for lackluster free agents. If Weaver wants to sign a one year deal in arbitration then I'm all for it but I wouldn't touch him for a 4/5 year deal. We have to much pitching coming up to be splurging silly money on pitchers for long term deals. Same with Millwood. Washburn blows and I don't understand the interest. His ERA in 2005 was a mirage and he'll never see a sub 4.00 ERA again. Flyball pitchers with a Dominance < then 5.00 are rarely successful. His dominance has fallen from a peak of 6.1 to a low of 4.8 last year.
But again, we're not done yet.
My whole issue with the pitching is that I don't expect a whole lot because the solutions that I see are limited and of the pick your poison variety, it's the same with the outfield, unless he does something incredibly stupid, I won't think any less of him, but for me to be happy that he is our GM versus an average GM, he'd have to do something astounding to fix either of our holes, which I hope happens, but I won't be disappointed in him if it doesn't.
To me, his biggest accomplishment so far is that he isn't as bad as some posters on here feared he would be.
Hike.
But as Jon has pointed out, we'll see...
I'm alright with Colletti, as Jon says, so far.
Hey if Ned wants to splurge on Damon without taking any salary away from anywhere else would you really care. If he has to move Kent or Drew to make the deal then it is a no brainer no, but if he was to just add Damon I'd be happy with it. He will probably be effective for at least 3 of the 5 years of the deal. Or maybe Ned will get creative again and offer 3 years for 40 mill.
He was 2nd in baseball with 394 putouts in CF
Bill James gives a range factor of 2.93 which is 4th best in baseball. BP had him as a plus CF until 2005.
His translated historical numbers from BP are
288/355/438
He's had only one bad year in a long career and that was in Oakland which I guess could be the reason for the bias against him since so many DT posters are Oakland fans.
He's does have a popgun for an arm-big negative
His splits are excellent as he one of the few LHH who can actually hit LHP.
He's amassed 600 plus at bats six years in a row.
A lineup of
Damon
Furcal
Drew
Kent
Cruz
Choi
Mueller
Navarro
would be impressive.
And, hey, it's not my money.
Too though, anything that suggests McCourt mightn't be all about the payroll squeeze after all (though I think by now there's some evidence the "McCheap" thing is a misnomer) gladdens me besides. It doesn't absolve him of other idiocies, but it suggests we might live through this.
I wonder if folks have any interest in floating/exchanging holiday gift ideas, esp. for spouses/partners/SOs/girlfriends, whatever. My thought was that if people offered up any particular home runs they have hit over the years, then we all might find a way to get some extra credit here. Most of my good gifts tend to be one offs -- tickets to something, or a stay overnight somewhere cool, a childhood photo recovered and framed, so I don't have too much to offer, but I'll start:
I did great a few years ago with the DVD box set of My So Called Life. The show lasted just one season, so you get the whole thing and it's not too expensive, and for a mid to late thirty-something lady, it strikes some pretty good chords. For me it was funny, I never watched the show originally, and I expected to identify with the high schoolers, but ended up identifying -- sort of -- with the parents. Yikes.
Another hit took a little more work: I found a recipe for a dessert she really likes (cheesecake brownies, but any recipe would work). Bought all the ingredients and a quality baking pan, and got matching stupid chefs hats for her and our son, and then gave it to both of them as a thing to do together.
Another hit was nice pajamas from Nordstroms. Hard to go wrong there.
Bought all the ingredients and a quality baking pan, and got matching stupid chefs hats for her and our son, and then gave it to both of them as a thing to do together.
Meanwhile, you were in watching football...I like it...
Whew, you scarred me Jon!
Hopefully not for life...
Lee, Pujols, Delgado, Clark, Helton, Giambi, Berkman, Teixiera, Howard, Nick Johnson, Sexson, Konerko, Shelton, Casey, Overbay, Dan Johnson.
A couple of players are likely to fall off this list (Clark mainly) but there are also a couple who will come up (Morneau). Cost is a big factor here, but is having the 16th best first baseman really solid?
You were clearly joking about Lima. The only thing I was wondering about was if the Lima comment was a snide comeback to suggestions of getting Tomko or just sort of general inanity.
For the record, if Tomko could in fact be had for a year at 3.5 million (or maybe two years at 6), I'd be pretty happy with him as our fourth starter. Seems like a no-brainer.
jd drew
jose cruz
ricky ledee
jayson werth
jason repko
cody ross
andre ethier
delwyn young
joel guzman
the remaining decent outfielders on the market:
damon
jacque jones
reggie sanders
kenny lofton
nomar
preston wilson
matt lawton
juan encarnacion
jeromy burnitz
both lists arent pretty. Should we try and give some 1 yr deals to guys like wilson, lawton, encarnacion, burnitz, lofton, nomar and sanders and see if we can catch lightening in a bottle?
Furcal gets a $5 million signing bonus and $4 million salary for 2006, $13 million in 2007 and 2008, and a deferred payment of $4 million in 2009, according to the Daily News.
http://www.dailynews.com/dodgers/ci_3282106
How far away were the Dodgers from winning the division last year? Well I count 19 blown saves as a team. Let's say a healthy Gagne is good for 75% of those; call it 14. Yet they only finished 11 out. Is it possible that the Dodgers were literally one player (Gagne) away from winning the division in 2005?
I definately recall Yhency giving up several home runs in tie games, however.
Candlesticks make a nice gift.
We really do need to figure out the OF and the starting rotation and then I'll feel pretty darned good about our chances. The SP could indeed be solved more internally (with the young 'uns) then externally (where the choices are pretty thin and over priced), but those guys, at least one of them, have to show they're ready in Spring. Broxton has a world of talent but I'm not so sure he can be a starting pitcher yet - needs to learn to balance control in a longer game a bit better. (Hey, where does Chuck Tiffany stand in all this? Still another year away? No longer a prospect?)
I also agree with Curtis re: Tomko. Let us not go there, lest we give ourselves severe stomach pains.
And as much as I want to solve our OF, I hope Damon isn't part of it, at least not long term.
Washburn was like Paulie, always had something to say in the newspaper. especially vocal around the almost strike a while back. Plus he is a Boras client and Stoneman is no fan of Boras.
tiffany will start the year in AA jacksonville. He is a little behind billingsley/broxton/etc.
he needs to learn to stop giving up homeruns and gain more stamina. but he is still very much a prospect.
I had a hunch that you were kidding.
Hey, I hacked it.
I'd say more like two players away: Gagne, and somebody who could throw people out trying to steal second.
Washburn was like Paulie, always had something to say in the newspaper. especially vocal around the almost strike a while back.
That is what soured me on LoDuca. I didn't like him being traded because good catchers are hard to come by. But, I wasn't sad to hear his mouth leave town. I felt the same way about Brett Butler, even more so. What he did to the replacement players wasn't right.
Wow. Thanks
Overall, I give Mr. Ned good marks for his moves to date. Sorry to see Milton leave but that definitely was not a decision made on "baseball performance" terms.
I'm still hoping for the best for Hee Seop.
My initial guess is that it didn't make that big of a difference and the team as a whole would have still sucked.
http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/5170814
RIP, Darrell Russell
There is some truth to that I think, but how to measure this pressure is beyond me.
Did the White Sox play well last year because they had a fair amount of stolen bases (by today's standards)? Well, who knows?
could this man over take choi as the best positional player to come out from korea!?!
The 2005 Dodgers were a terrible team. We've rehashed the reasons why the team stunk a million times on here.
I'm sure the inability to prevent stolen bases (I'm blaming the pitchers too) hurt the team. However, I don't think it hurt the team as much as injuries, crappy pitching, and having a lackluster offense.
The 2005 Dodgers were a terrible team. We've rehashed the reasons why the team stunk a million times on here.
I'm sure the inability to prevent stolen bases (I'm blaming the pitchers too) hurt the team. However, I don't think it hurt the team as much as injuries, crappy pitching, and having a lackluster offense.
I blame our pediatrician who made us switch insurance to stay with her and that insurance just didn't cover as much.
How nice of her.
(ruining the joke by explaining it: women in the bay area went ga-ga over Snow for years)
130. Thanks, I know what you mean, my cousin just had twins and for one of them they are just waiting for her to die, a very sad story. We're debating bringing the 8-year old when we go to visit them on Saturday.
If you're really looking for a live rooster, then Brookville Market on Connecticut Avenue in Cleveland Park is as close are you're gonna get. Pam the butcher really gets 'em fresh (there's always Union Meat at Eastern Market). As far as non-edible yet practical gifts go, Rodman's, also on Connecticut but between Tenleytown and Friendship Heights, has a basement full of pots, pans, and other random culinary devices. They've also got quite the international candy selection!
The limit is 25.
Wasted talent. Any word on Barrett Robbins?
"Cerrano's looking for some extra power for tonight. He's looking to sacrifice a live chicken. Man, we can't have people puking in the locker room before the game!"
How will I be able to carry on my vendetta against Frank Robinson?
Or to quote Sideshow Bob's son, "Vendetta! Vendetta! Vendetta!"
Vendetta! Vendetta! Vendetta!
Less so in fact, as at least he's coming out to meet with the Dodgers. The only mention of the Angels is a sentence at the end of the blurb, that Stark is reporting the "Angels may be interested in Damon". Juicy!
Then a dormant period around Christmas. Unless someone can explain to me how I tell a 6-year old who is new to the country what a blog is. The kid probably doesn't even know what baseball is.
Thats just wrong. You could always tivo the Johnny Damon beard TV commercial put it on loop and leave the little runt in front of the TV.
Bob, how long has the 6-year old been with you? I remember you mentioning him a month or two ago.
Does he speak any English? Figured baseball and the Dewey decimal system would have been the first two things he learned.
Sad story and a sad ending. I have a hard time though really saying good things about the guy as he was involved with him and his friends raping a woman. It is sad he was not given a chance to makeup for some of the bad he had done in his life.
Reggie Sanders/Kenny Lofton = Brian Jordan/Raul Mondesi.
Yes?
163. langerhans had a 267/348/426 line, and Johnson hit 241/334/397, between the two they had about 700 PA. Francoeur hit well, but the other guys werent anything special. I think between that between Young, Guzman, Ethier, and Ruggiano we could get about 750 OPS for ~500 PA. BP's Pecota forcast before the season said Delwyn Young would have a .266 EQA for 2006, and that forcast should improve.
"Mueller was reluctant to disclose details of his conversation with Colletti about Little, whether he communicated with Kent or Lowe before choosing the Dodgers or whether he has lobbied free agent outfielder Johnny Damon to follow him to Los Angeles.
"But it sure would be nice if he came to L.A.," Mueller said of Damon."
Hmm...
http://tinyurl.com/7aknh
Sorry... Yes, that should really be the other order of business these days. I'm curious who he'll want. Was anyone retained (besides Manny Mota)? Did they let Tim Wallach go already? Pitching and hitting coaches will be crucial... hope he decides soon...
It's my brother's son and he lives in Michigan. It's his fourth kid. I don't have any kids, which is probably a good thing. I think I do much better as an uncle than I ever could as a father.
Are you saying that your brother gave you one of his kids because he has 4? :)
Drew's contract is a compromise between a standard, no-out, five-year contract and no contract at all.
I think I have to take one back after I visit.
The 6-year old doesn't know much English and just started his first formal schooling ever the Monday after Thanksgiving. But he seems to speak Spanish pretty well. And he was able to convey to his mother that he wanted fried plantains.
Anyone with tips on frying plantains correctly can feel free to contact me and I'll pass them along.
Giles signed for 3/$34M, which includes the hometown discount, but he's 3 years older than JD.
Giles had a .325 eqA last year, an OPS of over .900, and a rate2 over 100 (for LF).
Drew had a .322 eqA last year, an OPS of over .900, and a rate2 of 105 (for CF).
Of course, Giles has played in 150 games or more in 5 out of the last 6 years. IF JD stays healthy (135 games+), it could be awfully tempting for him to opt out. Quite a risk on his part, but LA would be rewarded with an MVP-caliber season if Drew is even considering it a year from now.
A) Nomar
B) Johnny Damon
C) Carl Yastremski
D) Ted Williams' frozen head
E) A & B
I give up. Wake me when the OF renovation project is complete.
Because it would take too much to get Dunn as the Reds have no need to trade him after trading Casey, plus he is not the type of player that will age well.
http://tinyurl.com/blb4u
If the Dodgers are that desperate for an impact CF'er, I'd try to talk the Cards into trading Jim Edmonds. Edmonds is older, on the downside of his career. It might not cost as much as Damon.
With the Cardinals opening a new stadium and Edmonds a fan favorite, I doubt he'd be available. But he's one player I think that could make the Dodgers a pennant contender. Strengthens the Dodgers and weakens the Cards.
"I asked Santa Claus for another pitcher and another outfielder, and he told me he was going to help me out," said Colletti with a big smile on his face. "Coming here for all the years I did with visiting clubs, I always got the sense that the L.A. Dodgers had a great heart for the community."
Gosh, I really don't like any of our options at OF. I suppose I would offer a bunch of them a 1-year deal and see who bites (sounds like what Ned had done?) I sure don't want any of these wounded on anything more than a 1-year deal. Are there any non-tender possibilities on December 20? We may have to make a deal with Texas.
194, Yeah, Victor Diaz sounds pretty good right now.
204 Why?
From what I know of linguistics and child development, it's nearly impossible to hold on to a second language acquired at a young age unless you are forced to use it everyday. Young kids are like sponges with languages because they're not learning them like we did in high school and reciting sentences. They're just trying to talk to someone and somehow all the grammar rules fall into place.
I always find that amazing. I have a lot of respect for anyone who has learned English as a second language because, face it, it's not an easy language to pick up. The words are pronounced strangely (through, plough, dough, cough), the spelling is weird and the use of prepositions doesn't correspond well to other languages.
b. read through last night's thread and you'll get a glimpse.
I think we should get Lofton. I'm fond of former U of Arizona point guards.
http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/
http://www.bostondirtdogs.com/
Bob T, as always you are correct on early language development and acquisition. As a child I lived in Latin America, and I was as fluent as a seven-year-old can be in a second language. We moved back to the States when I was eight, settling in white-bread Kansas City, MO of all places, where my Spanish went completely unused and was lost for all time in very short order. Strangely, I still have dreams filled with Spanish conversations that make perfect sense to my unconscious mind.
Been enjoying this site for months; this is my first post! Very odd.
Perhaps to coincide with what will surely be a revamped, and much improved, lineup next year?
I don't suppose the 51's games can be found on the internet, something similar to the Suns. How are we going to keep up with the gang in Vegas next season?
Steve Kerr played baseball in high school. He's rested up.
Ted Williams' frozen head didn't pass the physical. It was dropped and had a hairline fracture.
My son is already trying to convince me to go to Fresno to see them
They don't think that it will heal in time for the season.
The Cards have signed Braden Looper to a 3 year deal
I don't think Softbank or Lotte are going to be losing any sleep.
222 Don't know for sure but am hopeful the new site will have a place for listening online. They are currently covered by 1460 in LV: http://foxsportsradio1460.com/home.php
But as a fox affiliate I doubt they let people listen online for free... check the 51s web site next week tho.
As a fan of the Man in Black, I respectfully disagree with that assertion about Mr. Ed.
I don't know, I have a sinking feeling that Grabowski is going to be a superstar in Japan, like Randy Bass. Stranger things have happened. Of course, I can't think of any right now.
Why would someone whose goal is to infuriate people stop before s/he infuriates people?
kinda always like your goal the last 2 years?
No. My goal is to have fun. I like people to play along, not get upset.
Also-- I'm glad to see you on the Encarnacion bandwagon. There's still room for plenty more!
I was lucky enough to see Johnny in concert once -- at the House of Blues in Chicago. It was one of the best concerts I've ever been to. Simply amazing. Truth be told . . . I didn't see Mr. Ed anywhere.
i value my life!
(I had a unix shell account, so my surfing was text only; and we LIKED IT that way!)
Slams fist onto desktop...
lofton-2mil
tomko- 4.5 mil
=12.5 mil
basically, its either damon, or those 3. with all the holes we need filled, id rather choose those three and hope we catch lightening in a bottle.
if you add 12.5 mil to the current payroll, its about 95-100 mil. End of offseason, get ready for spring training.
but the article goes on and states that lakers dont want to give up odom or bynum for artest.
kwame for artest! do it mitch!
because like mueller, he loves mr. ned and wants to play for him again.
or we can just threaten him.
wow i just read a LA daily news article that lakers, specifically jackson, really want artest and have strong interest to trade for him.
I knew Phil would be interested.
LA still has Jeff Kent...
Brown and George for Artest. Would Indiana do that? They might, if they're in the same kind of weak bargaining position that Mr. Ned was in with Milton.
Apparently Flanders wants Nomar to play first, so I am no longer as excited about getting Nomar. Put him in left Flanders come on!.
But Colletti believes his biggest current hole is not a position in the field, but one in the batting order. Specifically, the five slot behind cleanup hitter Jeff Kent. The top of the tentative lineup would have Furcal, Miller, J.D. Drew and Kent. A healthy Garciaparra would be the best available candidate to bat fifth.
mr. ned's a smart man. a top 5 of furcal, mueller, drew, kent and nomar would be pretty swell.
Yep. Artest is exactly the kind of player the Lakers need. And like I said the other day, I really think Phil would be excited about the challenge of reforming Artest into a well-behaved person.
So much for Choi hitting 2nd. Oh well, I guess 7th (in a platoon with Tomato) is better than nothing.
you have to be kidding me.
kent isnt that exciting, there isnt much chance of fight or on-field incident, unless we can get Bonds involved.
I can see Kent getting upset with Choi. Hee's happy-go-lucky nature could be mistaken for indifference and giving less than 100%.
I hope Choi still has some friends on the roster. Like you said, Milton seemed to be his best pal.
The one thing that you cannot do is to give up one of your best pieces for a head case.
I know Tomko would take a 2 year contract at around $3 - $3.5 mil per year. I know Tomko's agent, they would accept a 2 year deal worth around $6-7 mil.
-----
I found this in the DT archives. This was something I posted during Jon's "Innings Eater" post. It's more or less a comparison between Weaver & Tomko. Read into it as you wish. IMO, they are pretty similar.
Tomko will probably command around $3-4 million a year for the next contract, he made $2.6 in 05. His stats aren't all that bad, especially at his home park or at Dodger Stadium. Adjust them a bit for pitcher friendly Dodger Stadium and he looks even better at a great price. His record last year is very deceiving as the SF bullpen blew a lot of his leads, he could have easily had 12 wins in 05. We are full of #3 pitchers and I don't think Weaver is an ace of any staff. I think the Dodgers would be better off pursuing a guy like Brett Tomko, cheap and he'll do the job.
Here's how they compare:
Tomko W L IP SO ERA
2002 10 10 204.1 126 4.49
2003 13 9 203.2 114 5.29
2004 11 7 194 108 4.04
2005 8 15 191.2 114 4.48
Weaver W L IP SO ERA
2002 11 11 200.2 132 3.52
2003 7 9 159.1 93 5.99
2004 13 13 220 153 4.01
2005 14 11 224 157 4.22
IMO, they look pretty even with the exception of 05. I blame a lot of what happened in 05 on him playing for the Giants. That team sucked the first half of the season, no run support, horrible defense, and a bullpen that loved to give up runs.
Here's Tomko's stats at Dodger Stadium (DS) and his Home Stats from 2002-2005.
Tomko GS W L ER ERA
05 DS 3 0 1 8 4.08
05 SBC 14 6 5 3.58
04 DS 3 1 0 5 2.01
04 SBC 13 6 4 5.31
03 DS 1 0 0 5 8.44
03 Busch15 4 4 2.88
02 DS 2 2 0 1 0.6
02 QC 18 6 5 4.13
DS Stats 02to05- 9GS-3W-1L-19ER-2.88ERA
Home Stats 02to05- 60GS-22W-18L-170ER-3.92ERA
His stats at home are solid, as are his stats at Dodger Stadium.
280. if Loaiza is worth 3 years at $7 per, Tomko will be asking upwards of that amount. if you know him or his agent, id like to speak to Brett, i could get him a lot more than $2-3 mil.
Maybe 96 all day long and 97 for 1/2 a day.
Really. He does throw that very hard. But, it is straight.
Aren't we still paying Tom Goodwin?
maybe somene should teach him a 2 seamer and have him throw it at 93 with more movement...
There have been indications over the last 24 hours, however, that the Yankees and Indians have grown less optimistic about their chances of signing Garciaparra. The Indians are believed to be concerned that Garciaparra won't prefer a job as an every-day right fielder. And the Yankees apparently believe that Garciaparra would prefer to play first base in Los Angeles over a job as a first baseman-DH in New York, in part because he owns two homes in southern California.
the 4th team involved was supposedly the Astro's. this seems to say that Nomar would play first, i like Nomar but not if he's playing 1B fulltime. I like him a lot better as a 3B/LF/choi-platoon-mate. So if we get Nomar, the dodgers are just a bunch of Braves, Giants, and Red Sox. Im ok with that.
Interestingly enough, Nomah's splits are better vs. righties than lefties, which wouldn't make for a very good fit in a Choi/Nomah platoon.
291 cracked me up.
I can't believe we got Bill Mueller for 9 million, and the Cards just paid a replacement level pitcher 13 million.
i think sometimes, you have to blame the coach for these type of situations. Do you think Edwin Jackson will be listening to any pitching coaches after taking Colburn's advice back in spring training 2004?
My guess is that Choi will eventually be in a trade for a pitcher.
I wonder how many people we interview for each coaching position.
Manager = 25
Coach = 12? or does it depend on which coach?
Pitching coach = 19 interviews
Bullpen coach = 3 interviews
He's now suggesting that Garciaparra is going to be signed to play first for the Dodgers.
Or is this coming "off the record" from someone like Colletti?
Choi has very little trade value right now. Beane might have been interested but he has first basemen and DHs coming out of his ears.
Why not? I can see Choi and a prospect for a starter. And now it's a rumor.
Can we get Grabowski back from Japan?
if Dodgers sign Garciappara, get ready for Choi to virtually dissapear from the discussion, if he hasnt already. but this is the media, "journalists" (i prefer to call them idiots) talking. But Colletti has talked more about filling holes in the outfield than 1B. Im building my trust with Colletti, i think he knows whats up.
Problem solved.
Mueller, and Garciaparra, then this
establishes that players will now sign
with the Dodgers, despite the past mess
and continuing McCourt ownership. Kudos
to Colletti. Now we just need some pitching.
--- this post made with Lynx, just to prove
to Mr. Timmerman that it was possible --
Don't forget the anti-Olmedo train too.
Could not resist:)
borat lives!
http://cbs4boston.com/local/local_story_349224857.html
I need to go work on my gopher.
A little off subject but someone finally appears to be giving Frank and Jamie the proper PR advise: "Get out of the way." They seem to be taking a much lower profile since Ned came on board. Of course they are not really out of the way they are just in the background but its an improvement.
If you're out there, have you ever thought about making the registration process a little less expeditious? There's a five day wait before you can buy a handgun in this country (right? I forget), but anybody can post here within ten minutes of the fancy striking him? Could make the threads that come when the Dodgers make a big move less, um, you know.
Which team would win the game?
Dodgers
C Navarro
1B Choi
2B Kent
SS Furcal
3B Mueller
OF Werth
OF Cruz
OF Drew
SP Houlton
51s
C Martin
1B Loney
2B Young
SS Aybar (no one else to put here)
3B LaRoche
OF Rico Washington (minor league free agent)
OF Ernie Young (minor league free agent- good veteran leadership)
OF Tydus Meadows (did we resign him?)
SP Billingsley
and lucky you miltie. i have two more finals tomorrow, my most difficults ones. acct 200 and philosophy of science.
is= his
las vegas 51s are absurd:
C martin
1b loney
2b young
ss guzman
3b laroche
lf meadows
cf ruggianno
rf ethier
how many runs per game? 10?
Weren't you saying to trade for Adam Dunn earlier? Talk about bad strike zone judgement.
We already fit the minor leaguers we have to on the 40 man roster. Next year will not be a problem either as those minor leaguers will actually start playing for us.
I was just about to type the same thing, so I know how you feel. Just handed in the last of my finals. 4 of which were painfully long papers. Feels good to finally finish. It's been a long week.
those are park factors for major league and minor league stadiums.
I dont know how to read those. I assume 1 is the average and everything else is deviated from one. can someone explain it more thoroughly for me.
My last final was economics, so...
If the Johnny Damon costs $13 million and Bill Mueller, Nomar Garciaparra, Brett Tomko, and Rudy Seanez also cost $13 million, what is the opportunity cost of Johnny Damon?
A. $13 million
B. Nomar Garciaparra, Brett Tomko, and the leftover cash
C. Bill Mueller, Nomar Garciaparra, Brett Tomko, and Rudy Seanez
D. $13 million and Bill Mueller, Nomar Garciaparra, Brett Tomko, and Rudy Seanez
There is no problem with that, it just depends on who are trading for and what we have to give up.
Dodgers v. Beltre...and the Mariners on Thursday, March 30 at 7:05 p.m. Cubbies and Fathers follow for 2 games.
See http://www.lv51.com/news/?id=787 for more.
Do you think they'll keep Guzman at SS in order to get more bats into the AAA lineup? With the way our ML outfield situation is shaping up, I would start him in RF. Of course, there's also a chance that Young could start in LF giving us a prospect-laden outfield in AAA:
LF Young
CF Ethier
RF Guzman
Ruggianno seems like he could start the year back at Jacksonville. Even though he OPS'ed very well (.950 OPS), his terrible strikeout rate (56Ks in 161ABs) demonstrates that he needs some more adjustment time.
Jon Weber was also re-signed to a minor league contract, thus he may fit into the AAA outfield situation. He's not as solid offensively as Meadows, but he's much stronger defensively and can do a passable impersonation of a Center-Fielder.
But only in the self-immolation sense
Is it Squints, the red headed, freckled catcher?
Od. Perez for Ron Artest.
if you are offering, on her behalf, i accept
vr, Xei
Chad Billingsley
Scott Elbert
Matt Kemp
Chin-Lung Hu
Tony Abreu
Chuck Tiffany
Justin Orenduff
Travis Denker
Blake Johnson
Julio Pimentel
Justin Ruggiano
I haven't been able to come up with a way to protect all of them and none of them are players I'd really like to expose.
Furcal(.290/350/410)
Mueller(290/360/415)
Kent (280/385/500)
Dunn (250/410/530)
Drew (280/405/540)
Big Korean (270/370/450)
werth/cruz (250/345/440)
Narr.(260/350/420)
What do you think. (Projected Number comments of yours truly).
Junior college is easier than high school.
are you a business major too?
Wow, mine started last wednesday and lasts a month and two days.
i took economic perspective last semester, i got an A in it although to this day, i dont know how. next semester i have to take another stupid econ course. along with managerial acct.
Diaz (pitcher; who?)
Alomar
Phillips
Izzy
Kent
Myrow
Edwards
Grabowski
Repko
Ledee
Ross
I did not want to do Calculus so I took Stat, which was an AP class I already took in high school so it was easy.
its a what if scenario!!!
Furcal-12/60
Mueller-13/67
Kent- 25/over100
Drew- 33/90-100
Dunn 40/ over100
bIG kOREAN-25/ 75
CRUZ 18/70
nAV. 10/50-60
the course isnt bad at all. in fact, its probably my most interesting class. BUT, since its an elective, its not high on my learning and studying list. I just wrote a 10 page paper on Latakos's research programs and how they relate or explain the events in the edible knowledge paradigm.... or something wierd like that.
That is, if the 51s played a 5-1 game at home and then a 3-2 game on the road, Las Vegas's park factor for runs would be (5+1) / (3+2) = 1.2. You calculate it the same way for all the other counting stats.
As far as the weights, he just used a weighted average of the park factors for the past three years with weights of 8 for the previous season, 5 for two seasons ago, and 3 for three seasons ago. That is, (8 PF1 + 5 PF2 + 3 * PF3) / 16.
If you wanted to translate a players numbers to "park neutral" based on this system, you would divide the player's home counting stats by the park factor (or for simplicity you could just adjust half).
A. outside
B. inside
c. near the top of the curve
d. near the bottom of the curve
LOWe
PEnny
Perez
CBILL
Jaskson
If cbillz or jackson struggle we could alway get another starter at the trade deadline. This is going to be Jacksons breakout year because he is train with Eric G.
LOWe
PEnny
Perez
CBILL
Jaskson
If cbillz or jackson struggle we could alway get another starter at the trade deadline. This is going to be Jacksons breakout year because he is training with Eric G.
its not outside... im going to say B, inside.
D?
Wild guess
I would love Dunn, but not at the cost. If he were a FA, for example, I would exert full court press to get him. I would give him Konerko $ and perhaps Green $. No one here is saying that they would not LOVE Dunn is Dodger Blue - but we are not comfortable giving up what it appears the reds want.
Scott Elbert born May 15, 1985 (age 19 on June 5, 2004)
Justin Ruggiano born April 12, 1982 (age 22 on June 5, 2004)
Blake Johnson born June 14, 1985 (age 18 on June 5, 2004)
So, after looking more closely, Johnson would not be exposed (by 9 days... phew), but Elbert and Ruggiano would be since they were 19 in the year they were signed. That is, each of them only gets three years of unprotected minor league service time (2004, 2005, and 2006).
I think Balco is actually Icaros. Or Jon. Jon and Balco never post at the same time. hmmmm
Loney (Casey at best)
LaR (David Wright or Mike S)
Guzman(Billy Asley)
here's one for the people with econ degrees (my last question)
ok..I can't think of one off the top of my head, so this one isn't as creative and I'm pretty much just copying it off of one of my homeworks
Q: If a perfectly competitive firm (the Dodgers) discovers that the marginal revenue earned from selling one addition unit is significantly more than the marginal cost of producing that unit, it can likely increase its profit by:
A. Decreasing the sales price (of Jason Repko jerseys)
B. Increasing the sales price (of Alex Cora special collectors mugs)
C. Decreasing the output level by at least one unit (downgrading from Hee Seop Choi to J.T. Snow)
D. Increasing the output level by at least one unit (upgrading from Jayson Werth/Ricky Ledee to Reggie Sanders)
NATE- DO NOT ANSWER THE QUESTION
I guess D, because I figured bottom of the curve meant near the origin. Oh well not like I have any clue about any of this stuff.
[470] - D
Is it D?
This may be an example of the mysterious delayed double-post as my first one seems to have been lost in the ether.
loney= lyle overbay
laorche= right handed eric chavez
guzman= a better, more consistent version of reggie sanders
Yes, you are correct
Jumbo Diaz. Never heard of him but a great name. Would have been better name for Broxton than The Bull. Can't you hear Vin now "Jumbo, as his friends like to call him, just hit triple digits on the gun."
There is a strip club somewhere in LA called "Jumbo's Clown Room." Great name but who would call their strip club "Jumbo's Clown Room"?
megrew is coming off of TJ surgery and luis gonzalez isnt anything special.
I did not need no fancy degree to get one of the two correct lol.
Gary Sheffield's autobiography
306/.397/.579
495. i like the guzman comparison with richie sexon, i think Derrek Lee also works. Both guys are tall athletic righthanders with big power and lots of strikeouts.
thats really wierd.
Loney in some sense is the opposite of Guzman. That is, I think his upside is fairly limited (fringe-average 1B), but he's a much safer bet to reach it.
I get it.
Maybe I should take an econ class in my life, seems interesting.
Why do I get the feeling you know exactly where it is located, LAT?
I would take LaRoche over Guzman.
James Loney=David Justice
Delwyn Young=Ray Lankford (minus the speed)
Joel Guzman=Dale Murphy
Andy LaRoche=Scott Rolen
Andre Ethier=Larry Walker
Justin Ruggiano=Mike Cameron
Can someone over 30 (who saw him play) give me some info on Howard Johnson? Who would you compare him to today? etc..
lets see if guzman can out hit Dlees AAA numbers next year.
324/400/477
29 doubles 13hr
k/pa= .22
bb/pa= .11
Wow, maybe even I underestimate how people here view our prospects.
Johnson was like Bagwell, without the weight lifting.
514- high school econ is great and very fun...college not so much, but that just might be my teacher...
Yeah we have a sports econ class. There were a few sports management classes and other courses like that I wanted to take next semester but they conflicted with a class I had to take.
I'm not sure that is the best comparison. Bags in his prime was a GREAT hitter who not only hit for average but was truly feared as a long-ball threat. HoJo was good but he was not great (certainly not for any number of years). Also he was not the feared HR hitter on his team (that would be Strawberry when they played together). Perhaps an Aramis Ramirez comparison, depending on how good you think he is [Remember to discount the numbers for inflation in late 90s and 2000s]
Holy crap... and I find Santa Barbara cold.
I threw out bagwell because they were both 5'10 white guys playing third. That's the depth of my knowledge. I thought I covered myself with the "without weight lifting" but apparently you didn't fall for that. Good on you.
Martin=Varitek minus 20homeruns
Loney=Sean Casey
Young=Carlos Baerga
Guzman=Richie Sexson
LaRoche=Aramis Ramirez
Ethier=Ricky Ledee
Ruggiano=Jayson Werth (hopefully more durable)
i have a really hard time comming up with what Martin can be, he's a plus defensive catcher with good contact ability, draws lots of walks, but with questionable power. Maybe Paul LoDuca with more walks?
its okay, last one of the year. i can do it.
515. Brenden, actually its more embarassing than that. I have been there and have no idea where it is. Its in a strip mall (no pun intended) and it was bad all the way around. That is about all I can recall.
I really thought we had a good chance of getting him I guess we will have to come up with a new plan.;)
Sweet, what major?
That is the perfect answer LAT. That has happened to me once or twice(at least)
And the time before that was when I went to Baltimore in summer 1997 to see the Bash Brothers and got a foul ball from him instead. Is anybody up for a "Random Ernie Young Game Callback"? :)
Yeah, Senior. I took CA History that was a pretty easy class.
566-
UCSB has always been a challenging academic school, even when it was a huge party school. It is funny, because the party atmosphere has dwindled a lot since they put a police station in IV, but UCSB has risen in party school rankings.
Ha, i am doing the same. i dont really have that much stuff in my fridge. i am eating cookie dough ice cream right now. maybe make a PB and J later. i also have some baby carrot packages left. my fridge is pretty empty. my roommate and I dont buy a lot of food.
even all the beer is gone :(
I do not believe in untouchable because there is always someone out there I would want to trade for, but Billingsley and Elbert are the closest to untouchables in my opinion.
1 and 5 people have herpes or something crazy like that in the whole world. So UCSB having a high concentration does not surprise me, though it does scare me now.
Some of the most important words in parenting: "Do as I say, not as I do/did." It a license to be a hypocrite.
my cafeteria food is horrible. i'm moving into a new room with a full kitchen. i'm going to buy tons of canned food, spaghetti, rice, etc
Where is Thomas Nac when we need him to randomly walk past and say "...Denny Crane."?
...ok, enough random responses to 200+ posts ago.
i wont starve tonight, yay.
of course, i live like 10 mins from campus so i dont get to enjoy the plethora of food choices.
(DO NOT READ THIS IF YOU DO NOT LIKE TERRIBLY MESSED UP STORIES)
Apparently the crime that put the nail in the coffin for UCSB was this frat made all these guys drink till they passed out. Common frat garbage. Anyways, one guy they kept feeding booze to and he passed out and they left him outside. Then members of the frat took turns raping the guy. Then they shoved a bottle or something up his butt and just left him outside for a few days as he was passed out basically in a coma. The cops found him almost dead. The people in the frat all got arrested and it was decided to build a police station in IV and to try to curb some of the partying ways.
I eat all my vegetables raw.
20x better.
and Loney = JT Snow with a higher BA. If Martin doesn't break his ankle in a grotesque manner he could have quite a career.
I literally meant I buy fresh vegetables and just eat them raw, because my housemmates leave every pot and pan so dirty I am unable to use them to cook anything.
on the vegetables-
i found a container that had been filled with water for 3 months (the water smell bad), so i cleaned it out, threw the vegetables in the container, put a little water in it, and placed it in the microwave for 5 minutes.
if i ever get married, my wife is going to have to cook (and cook well)
Was that what you were getting at lol? I was not totally sure.
our own personal molly maid. i told him he needs to hold on to her.
Would a decent comp for HoJo be a switch-hitting Aubrey Huff?
OK, out for real, goodnight all.
You are so lucky! I wish we had a girl roommate just so my friends would not be so messy.
we're so lazy that we were thinking of hiring someone or paying a couple girls to clean the place
earlier this semester, our garbage disposal was broken for about a month and a half. And, the mold in there was quite disgusting. i didnt feel safe breathing the air in my house.
________________
Colletti has contacted teams with a surplus of starting pitchers, including the Chicago White Sox (Jon Garland, Jose Contreras), Boston (Wells), Yankees (Carl Pavano) and New York Mets (Kris Benson).
Garland, Contreras and Wells will become free agents after the season and Pavano sat out the second half last season because of a sore pitching shoulder.
The good - Things will be clean.
The bad - If you have the natural guy action of not caring about mess until sentient beings grow out of it, it will come back to haunt you. How depends exactly on who you are living with, but it will happen.
ice cream sandwiches or string cheese?
You kids. I think HoJo refers to Howard Johnson who played for the Mets in the 1980's. He and Strawberry were like the NYM Bash Bros. I thought he played 3rd base, though.
howard johnson = hojo
i didnt choose harden because of injury concerns, the same reason why i didnt choose peavy or beckett.
it was a choice between willis and zambrano for me. and I went with Big Z because hes huge as an Ox and i love his mean streak.
I would...
it was uhh.... interesting. i dont thin you want to be living with 15 girls on your floor, too much drama. wayyyy too much drama.
Free-agent outfielder Jacque Jones, a former USC All-American, also is close to falling off the Dodgers' radar.
That is totally true, but it is a double edged sword because you have to care about studying.
chicken nuggets- gone
corn dogs- 5 left
ice cream sandwiches- 2 left
string cheese- about 15-20 (it was a huge pack from Costco)
anyone else an at the drive in fan?
With that, I'm cashing it in. Good night all.
ill probably put in some Smiths later.
next years free agents.
#1 player i want is derrek lee.
On the FSN late night show, Michael Eaves, Gubicza, and Kennedy were Hot Stove-ing the Dodgers, and said stuff I'm happy to hear the MSM say. Not because it provides information, but because it actually seems right.
They said that the only priorities left are OF and SP. They went through the possibilities, admitted that Damon, Sanders, Lofton, and Nomar are all old and declining, but that short contracts laden with incentives might be a good idea. Kennedy said that they don't need and shouldn't pay for Damon. "He brings 2 things to the table: leadoff hitter and CF. The Dodgers don't need either." He wants Nomar.
As for pitching, they recognized that there aren't a lot of good options. Might have to overpay for Millwood or Weaver. That was about it.
No mention of 1b.
although overpaying for a SP isnt something i want to do.
that would make me happy.
1b-Lee
2nd-Young
3rd-Laroche
ss-Furcal
C-Martin
Lf-Lee
Cf-Milledge
Rf-Guzman
SP-Zito
SP-Penny
SP-Lowe
SP-Jackson
SP-Billingsley
We trade Navarro, Loney, and Izturis for uhh I really would not care at this point.
Yeah pretty much LaRoche. DeWitt will be on is way eventually and I think he will develop some good pop for a second baseman.
we would need a big lefty bopper in there. if drew doesnt opt out, he would be it.
milledge= CF
drew= RF
2.Milledge
3.Drew
4.Lee
5.Laroche
6.Guzman
7.Martin
8.Young
9.Oswalt
This lineup is potentially insane.
http://www.baseballwebtv.com/
that, is freakin awesome. I am definately getting a subscription. Ill scout our potential 2006 draftees! i do have some players in mind i would like logan white to get.
LZ for 07
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2260532
"But it was a merry day for the Royals. Santa already has delivered a big portion of Baird's wish list."
Does one laugh at or cry for the Royals fan when reading something like this?
That Christmas-come-early bounty? Scott Elarton, Doug Mientkiewicz, Mark Grudzielanek, and Paul Bako. I'll take the lump of coal, please.
And the fact that all 4 of those Royals signings serve as upgrades shows the sorry condition of the Royals
You guys really need to let go of that dream.
Yes, let it go. If it loves you, it will come back to you.
Almost a Balco-esque level of production there....hey, wait a minute...
New post up top.
I read that "article" and I totally agree with you. It's totally agenda driven without any notion of the facts and the truth of the matter.
Mueller was a Giant, sure, but M. Alou, F. Alou, and J. Fassero were all Expos, should we say tha the Giants are a retread of that franchise merely bc they have 2 players and a manager that spent time, ney, came up through the Expos system!
Furthermore, he fails to realize the difference between offering a K and signing a player. Lofton and Sanders have been offered K, but as one esteemed blogger has suggested its entirely possible that those offers are windo-PR-dressing. BTW there is no way the Dodgers sign BOTH those ex-Giants anyway.
More importantly, those 2 players are hardly "Giants". So they spent some time there--thats like saying anyone who signs Burnitz is a Dodger raider or Mark Grudzielanek for that matter.
Its one thing for a local writer to knock team policy, its entirely something else to have a foreign writer lambast your team, especially one from SF.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.