Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Those who had opinions this past offseason on the signing of Nomar Garciaparra came in three groups: those who wanted Garciaparra at any position, those who didn't want Garciaparra at any position, and those who wanted Garciaparra at a position other than first base. It's important to remember that some who disliked the idea of Garciaparra as a first baseman (okay, I was one of 'em) didn't dislike the idea of Garciaparra on the team.
Garciaparra's numbers in 20 games this year are rather gaudy: 1.099 OPS, five home runs - a much-needed bat while the Dodgers waited for Jeff Kent to come around. His defense at first base has looked rather acrobatic as well, at least on receiving throws. I still wonder if Garciaparra could have also been productive in left field - maybe, maybe not - still know that the inevitable slump that every player has will taper his stats, and still doubt that his health problems are behind him. As it is, he has still only played in 52 percent of the Dodgers' games this year. Like the team, we haven't seen him go much about .500.
Despite missing so many games, though, Garciaparra has been the Dodgers' most valuable player on offense (according to Value Over Replacement Player from Baseball Prospectus). Like J.D. Drew in 2005, a little Nomar has gone a long way.
* * *
Rather than fixate on the bullpen ad nausem, how about a Dodger starting pitching update?
Here are the numbers:
Brett Tomko, (4-1, 2.93)
Derek Lowe, (1-2, 2.98)
Brad Penny, (3-1, 2.66)
Aaron Sele, (1-0, 1.98)
Jae Seo, 1-2, 5.31 (But obviously he pitched well yesterday)
Not too shabby.
Sele goes up against Jeff Weaver on Friday. While I'd say both pitchers are due - Sele to come back to Earth, Weaver to not be horrible - I'm looking forward to that one.
Hopefully that makes him put too much pressure on himself, rather than just being the incentive he needs.
I am also among those who thought we did not need an upgrade at first, and doubted whether Nomar represented an upgrade. That ground is well worn, obviously, and I won't go into it.
That said, the guy is kicking butt right now on offense and, for what its worth, on defense. He's always had the kind of game that relies on reflexes and athleticism, so I worried that post-injuries, and a few years down the road, that he might not have this kind of run in him. Well, he does, and its fun to watch. Plus, I'm a sucker for the hometown thing.
I don't know if this has gotten discussed much, but as much as I liked Depodesta in theory, I have to say that in terms of getting things accomplished Colletti has proved nearly exceptional. Colletti was quite adept at signing who he set out to sign even if I didn't 100% agree with his targets. If MLB threw all the players into a pot and let the GMs take turns picking I'd probably want Depodesta but in the current world where a GM has to get free agents to sign and get other GMs to trade, I think Colletti has done quite well.
And Garciaparra is a case in point. I'm sure lots of GMs wanted to take a chance on the guy. Who wouldn't when the upside had a chance, no matter how slight, of being very high. Right now we are benefitting from that upside and Colletti deserves credit for that.
Happily, I was one of those guys who just wanted Garciaparra on the team. I figured that it would end up being a bust, but I couldn't stop thinking about the WhatIf. Let's hope the WhatIf keeps happening.
http://tinyurl.com/zhbdb
I've been rooting for the Sharks for years, and was rooting for them this year, but found this completely embarrassing conduct by the fans.
If you don't agree with all of Colletti's targets, the virtue of his being able to sign them all is certainly mixed.
In any case, trying to nip in the bud this turning into a Colletti-DePo thread (don't really have time to manage that one today) I doubt Colletti acquired significantly more of his preferred targets than DePo did. We know, for example, that Colletti didn't solve left field the way he wanted to.
The Sharks fans were just copying some other U.S. fans (I forget which city) that did that in the playoffs a few years back.
Does anyone seriously think that people in San Jose has a gripe against the nation of Canada?
It's Canada! It's mostly harmless.
Ha! Exactly. It's only May. We won't be able to properly judge Colletti until at least the end of the season, and preferably we give him three.
There's a new sentiment.
I guess this last homestand was just too much even for the Examiner diehards.
http://tinyurl.com/6sfh2
I think Ethier will be fine learning up in the majors, as long as the Dodgers show patience with him.
Oh well... So long and thanks for all the fish.
As for the Dodgers OF, I like Ethier but think he could probably benefit from some more seasoning in AAA, then come back again later in the year. Though Ledee doesn't excite me much at this point. Having Repko back will help though.
And Stewart pop bunted out.
And to respond to Jon (and sorry for starting a debate you don't want started), it's all a matter of degree on whether or not you want a GM with the ability to get players here who sometimes targets the wrong guys. But of course you are aware.
To illustrate, if Depodesta wants to sign 90% of the right players but gets them 40% of the time while Ned signs 70% of the right players but gets them 60% of the time, we are statistically better off with Ned who would end up batting .420 with Paul sitting at .360.
This is just a thought I've had lately and Ned certainly could end up being bad, but the biggest concern about Paul I always had was that he didn't seem to be as able to get the deal done. I admit, this is just an impression but I don't think that anyone can argue that the ability to deal is as important as identifying who to deal for.
Now looking back at my post, I see the flaw in my logic is that the hypothetical 70-60 Ned from above ends up spending more money and with more players a manager might feel like he needs to play. But with Little doing a quality job of playing the right guys so far (No Phillips at 1st!!!) and the "wrong" players probably still being decent, Ned's still looking okay to me.
I guess what my endless blather is saying is that Ned may not be as pretty but he's better in bed.
This isn't related to that, but i like prettier women who are not as good in bed better than uglier women who are better in bed.
LOL!!!!!!!!
And while Colletti was theoretically "on the job" for just a short time when he made his acquisitions, he was coming off another gig in which he used much the same philosophy, and he signed some of his ex-players. In other words, it seems like it was 50% familiarity and 50% taking his old strategic plan and just crossing out the word "Giants" wherever it appeared and writing in "Dodgers". I don't think he shifted much from what he would have done had he stayed at the Giants org than if he hadn't moved to the Dodgers.
Why do you wanna get rid of Ledee? He's a fine left handed bat off the bench...and he's really our only good left handed option.
I would like to get rid of Cruz and upgrade in LF also....some people have jumped down my throat for saying I want to upgrade in LF which I don't get. It's the only hole on our team where there is a potential to significantly upgrade over what we have now.
If the Giants were in a similar injury bind to the Dodgers, they would have been brining in AAAA players or making trades for mediocrities and hoping that they can keep catching Randy Winn in a bottle.
It's Tomko whom I'll never forgive him for signing.
"Canada: Mostly Harmless!"
6 I want to echo your sentiments about the What If scenario. When healthy, Nomar can obviously hit and has potential to be a great value at $6 million a year.
I concede your first paragraph. I have no real data. This is all just my impression and may be completely wrong. I was simply wondering if others had the same impression or have thought about such a metric when considering the success of a GM.
(also, sorry to make five off-topic posts about the national motto. i got carried away :) )
Nomar should be enjoyed, this streak he's on may be the best we ever get out of him.
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust."
All "E Pluribus Unum" and "Annuit Coeptis" have ever done for the country is to give conspiracy nuts more ammo.
I like it when people argue with me at work that U.S. currency has no intrinsic value because it isn't backed by gold. I respond to that by offering to take all their Federal Reserve notes off of their hands to save them the worry.
A mari usque ad mare
Sample size is a very tricky thing, and it can take months for numbers to stabalize. Let's just enjoy the production we're getting now, and wait until the end of the season to judge the end results of his moves.
33 I wasn't thrilled about Tomko either, but figured him to be a cheaper replacement for Jeff Weaver, and you have to admit, he's been a helluvalot better than Weaver or than expected...
The best thing Colletti has done is what he hasn't done - trade the farm for short term veterans. (Save for the EJ and Tiffany for Baez and Carter trade, and frankly the jury's still out on all of those guys...) That and signing Nomar. Did I mention I like Nomar?
Since Satan should be needing mittens before that ever happens, I feel safe in saying that I'll never forgive Colletti for the signing. ;)
I work in a public library. I meet gold bugs. I meet people who want books written by Father Coughlin.
And those are the sane ones.
A team that has different heroes each week is a sign of a good team. No one player is hot for an entire season. To have diff players pick up for someone who is slumping is a good sign.
Or, we could move to oregon and pray for rain delays after the 5th inning every day...
I think either solution is viable.
Such as a $10 trillion debt situation where the Federal Reserve has quit printing the M3 monetary aggregate, and where the GAO projected solutions for down the road are not pleasant and politically impossible to carry out. We're already printing a lot of money as it is, and we can't just print our way out of the problem, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's tried as a short-term, stupid, solution.
Not my floor fortunately.
If it was good enough for Weimar Germany, then it's good enough for the USA!
At least our country will end up producing some really good Expressionist Art and writers like Thomas Mann and Bertolt Brecht.
Meanwhile, just remind your Giants fans friends that their team is in last place and made very few moves in the off season beyond signing Matt Morris (yawn).
Well, not really. It's the sign of a mediocre (.500) team that gets to that record without long winning streaks and losing streaks. A team where everyone was hot for a while then cold for a while would get to the same place, just along a much more maddening path. A team where players take turns getting hot, then slumping is at least interesting, in that you never know what's going to happen. And I'll take mediocre and interesting over mediocre and predictable (Kent/Drew or Green/Beltre or bust) any day.
That's what I get when I try to throw razzing back in their face. Friggin' Bonds.
I'm not going to be crucified on a Cross of Gold again!
Not that we have anything particularly clever to yell back when the Giants are in LA, either.
just my dumb opinion. I'm sure I'm wrong.
I don't know how Giants fans could still be giving Dodger fans flack about signing Tomko if he does better for us than he did for them. It's about time the tides turn, I've had enough Tom Goodwin and Marquis Grissom nightmares for a lifetime.
Anaheim I find more annoying, what with the thundersticks. I also think the Braves' chop is stupid.
The problem, as you are aware, is not hitting it's relief pitching.
And if you read the LA Times, you would have no idea that there were any problems with the team.
The LA Times sports section writes about:
1) The Clippers
2) The Lakers and how they can get better
3) .....
4) .....
5) Long lines at concession stands at Dodger Stadium
6) The Dodgers
7) The Angels
8) The Galaxy
9) Chivas USA
10) The Ducks (who happen to be in NHL semifinals)
A game I recently went to, some group tried to get a "Gooooo-Dodgers-Go (clap clap)" chant started, and it didn't work because no one could really figure out the rythmn. If you don't have a classic chant, it's hard to get outside support.
"Beat L.A." conjures up too many bad memories of watching the Dodgers at the 'Stick and the Giants coming back to win the game in the bottome on the ninth. The horror of it all.
Then the team was given "West" jerseys and referred to that way in the WS, but the parents decided to continue with the G-H chant. It failed. They probably still blame the change of jerseys.
Nice William Jennings Bryan reference, Bob.
83 regfairfield - I find that strange. Haven't the Dodgers scored more runs than all the teams in the West and up there with all teams in the NL?
Toronto leads the majors at 217.
Are there any stat websites out there that distinguish between "earned" runs scored and "unearned" runs scored?
85 Anyone remember the obscure cartoon that used to be shown with Underdog (natch), "Go Go Gophers"? It had the theme song "Go go gophers, watch them go go go." Maybe we could use that for the Dodgers? Too obscure?
(Of course, that cartoon was fairly close to racist, too, in its depiction of Indians, or at least hasn't aged very well.)
{cough}
{ahem}
That was a miscarriage of justice on a par with the Scottsboro Boys case!
Or maybe my speeding ticket back in 1984.
How many leads has this team lost after the 6th inning? I know that a few of them were sizable leads.
Looks like the Dodgers have the 6th best avg. margin of victory in the ML, yet only the 13th best record. I suppose that suggests they have won a lot of blowouts, and lost a lot of close games.
The Examiner also featured a column on Bonds today in which he said he knew his teammates supported him because he'd read their statements of support in the media.
It's like he's isolated himself from his teammates for so long that he has absolutely no clue of how normal people support each other when they all work and travel together.
>>>I work in a public library.<<<
I thought you were the library.
There are 8 NL teams and 6 AL teams with records over .500.
Ah ah, you correct sir, ah ah ah...
I think my eyes lost focus while scrolling.
This is a good thing though, right? I'll take my chances on being able to protect big leads late in games, if given repeated opportunities to do so.
I do actually sort of think this is a good thing, but for a different reason: It's a little easier to find some arms to plug bullpen holes than to plug other holes a team might have.
It will be different - no more Lance Carter, for one.
And yes, I agree, bullpen arms are easiest to upgrade as the season progresses.
You changed my quote.
117 Jon Weisman
I wonder if those early leads were lost by the stater or middle relief. Probably the starter but it shows a need for good middle relievers too.
Yet how many times have we all walked into a room, flipped the light switch and burnt the bulb out, yet continued to flip the switch four or five more times just in case? Makes me feel stupid every time, but I can't stop.
Not a problem. Just was curious how many leads of any type had been lost after the 6th.
122 Johnson
:)
Furcal
Lofton
Garciaparra (NL Player of the Week)
Drew
Kent
Saenz
Cruz
Martin
Tomko
Not a bad lineup. Interesting that Saenz is playing 3b two days in a row, after Aybar's defense had some issues on the weekend. I'm sure that's not the only reason (match ups, etc)...
Unless I mistype something.
Does anyone else think Bob is taking to this "blogging" phenomenon like a duck to water?
It's a rare honor accorded to no one before!
I seriously hope the Dodgers get into the post-season for several reasons, not the least of which is that Bob's Random Game Callbacks might then include some pretty famous games, like Game 4 of the 1929 WS, when the Athletics overcame an 8-0 Cubs lead in the 8th inning with 10 runs of their own.
If I do them in the postseason, they won't be all that random.
62 Sums up what I think is the political majority here... not that there's anything wrong with that! :-P
124 Unless he was on your fantasy team. Seriously, though, between that and Matsui I was definitely thinking about injuries as I took my soon to T-ball....
What was the Over/Under on Seo giving up the HR to Bonds? I was certianly surprised he didn't.
However, the Aybar family should get some tickets for this weekend at Dodger Stadium as both brothers are up with their respective teams.
Dodgers...7-14-0
Rockies...2-8-0
WP-Tomko, LP-Fogg
I wouldn't mind seeing the league standings appear that way in the LA Times, personally.
-------
Uh, no. You can finish in the top four and not make the playoffs.
Is it considered the performance of a league average player, or is it supposed to imitate the performance of a AAAA type player.
I understand the various degrees of VORP and WARP, but don't have my head around this "replacement level player"
Thanks
"A replacement-level player is one who is "easily available" to any team--a AAA journeyman or end of the bench player. There's a research article I wrote explaining replacement level in gory detail in Baseball Prospectus 2002. Replacement level is significantly below average--about 80% of average for the position. If you think of it in OPS terms, roughly 70 points of OPS below the average for the position is replacement level. "
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4187
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2032
1. Program could only run on a system with internet access.
2. Read standings from mlb.com, espn.com or some other sports website.
3. Parse website of standings and extract standings info for each team.
4. Sort standings in format wanted.
5. Output into a text ascii file, using the html template of your choice.
6. You cut n paste that output text ascii file into your website or blog code, or however you modify your code.
I could do it in my spare time, which could be anywhere from a week to a month. Email me if interested. xeifrank@yahoo.com
vr, Xei
:)
Hey thats not that bad.
Just imagine if you were Irish, and saw the Notre Dame Fighting Irish and the little leprechaun every week on NBC.
Talk about stereotyping....
The Dodgers are all done with Houston.
John Laroche is done with fish.
Sarcasm - yes or no?
The fact that it is Saenz rather than Robles/Ramon makes it a little less annoying, but I want Aybar at 3rd more often than not.
Meanwhile, Gaffe-y Furcal racks up the E's with impunity.
Obviously I'm joking a bit, but it does put to rest some of the talk about not being able to score runs with little power.
vr, Xei
http://tinyurl.com/gattz
Bonds is getting it done now (on deck, at least according cbs sportsline)
. 5:19 p.m.
Do us proud, Houston.
Anyhoo, not a good start for Buchholz.
187 One positive about Furcal and Mueller, though, is that even when they're struggling at the plate, they still are taking walks and doing what they can to get on base. That being said, Furcal in particular has been weaker than expected defensively.
192 You never know. Vin still might have to call it.
vr, Xei
Just thought that might look familiar to some of you.
Baseball has sanctioned Bonds to play. He's a reality. The choices are either to get him out or make the best of things. I detest the message that's being sent by talking or joking about not pitching to him.
Aaron's late career surge was probably helped by Atlanta, but it wasn't helped when he was younger because County Stadium in Milwaukee was a pitcher's park
The Giants ought to thank everybody for the base, and when Finley cools off, find some better lineup protection.
The Bonds event is basically a non-starter -- he will pass Ruth. Even Scott Podsednik and pitchers can occasionally hit homers. Frankly, BB is looking so weak right now I'm amazed he's getting ANY intentional walks. Talk about surviving on past glories.
1. Walking/beaning Bonds
2. Steiner's "every flyball is a HR"-itis
Jon, sorry about the HBP remark, if it's been hackneyed here. Haven't been around enough to have a pulse on the mood of the site. I just blurted out a thought that occurs to me everytime I see Bonds' bloated mug.
How is acting childish in a child's game misguided?
How is acting childish in a child's game misguided?
Anyhow I don't really want to get into it. The question was more of a statement regarding why HBP and IBB comments have been taking place.
Buchholz has yet to give up a single.
The Houston announcers are openly derisive of Bonds. Which I think is unusual and not entirely professional.
Please ignore most of my comments tonight, I am very badly sun burned and kind of out of it.
Yesterday the Padres had Brian Giles walk 5 times in a 9-inning game and pitcher Clay Hensley strike out 5 times. It is, for now, believed to be the first time that's ever happened in the same 9-inning game according to Dave Smith of Retrosheet.
Marty,
Do you know of any good drinks for relieving sunbruins?
243 Yes
244 Yes
Thankfully I am moving in about 1.5 weeks and recently left my job.
The Reds lead the majors with 22 unearned runs allowed.
The Angels and Brewers have given up 21. Coincidentally, they are both at 188/167 (R/ER).
Furcal is hurting.
I'd still like to know how many unearned runs the Dodgers (and other teams) have received (without having to plow through the box scores, of course).
Look up sortable team stats.
Pick the pitching stats.
Then sort them by runs scored.
Then you can sort of eyeball the differences.
http://tinyurl.com/fx8b4
Oh never mind, you were asking the reverse.
That's harder to do.
Give me some time....
On a double, it's the first baseman's job to trail the runner to second base.
ain't it funny how even out fielders get involved in run downs! WOW MLB has to go back to the basic's
yup!
Don't you love it when a plan comes together?
Grab some pine meat!
http://tinyurl.com/fjkoo
LOL!
I wasn't able to convince my fiancee that we needed Bourbon but I was able to talk her into some pacifico and calamari ceviche.
The ceviche goes excellent with sunburns.
George Frazier is an older guy with dark hair and a mustache.
he has been wearing it all along. this season anyway....
cr
However, at his current pace, he'll bringing people their daily special from IHOP to the table.
Volume up a little too high when watching the Sopranos, I think.
At least he is being honest.
The game in New York would be suspended if they can't finish it tonight.
That's weird hu? He still looks kinda skinny but I think all the weight went to his legs or something? I don't know.
Hopefully he is falling apart.
Plus Nomar has played for Boston which magnifies anything he does.
I'm beginning to regret giving Olmedo boy for life status.
That would be some study if anyone ever did the research to find some sort of statistical analysis on it.
very scientific too.
& those affects are?
299 My response was to crack up, play baseball, and no, there was no trouble at bedtime (that night!). Guess he knows that the racket only works if everyone holds up their end.
best approach IMO see ball hit ball.
"Dr' 'e' 'w"
Yay Drew!
Being at .500 and three runs up hasn't worked so well for us. Maybe third time will pay for all.
you guys been making to much fun of him THAT'S NO COOL!
It couldn't happen to a nice guy
FRANCISCO CORDERO? Dosn't he pitch for DC & is great.
I think it was a splitter or an off-speed pitch. Good pitch, can't blame Cruz Jr.
He's heading to the pen because Liriano is going into the rotation. Finally! Wasting away as a reliever on my fantasy teams.
I think I'd stick pencils in my eyes...
Now that I think about it, we really haven't seen anyone but Saito and Beimel recently.
Yeah there arms are gonna fall off.
Where's the fun in that?
True, bring on Baez!?!
Tommy use too do that alot. I remember one game (I was there) where Tim Leary pinch hit & hit a bullet to Left field.
That does not seem likely.
Please let me be wrong.
At this moment in time, six weeks into the season Brett Tomko has been the best free agent starting pitcher signing in baseball.
At this moment in time, six weeks into the season Nomar has been the best positional free agent signing in baseball.
At this moment in time six weeks into the season Rafy Furcal has been the worse positional free agent signing in baseball.
By August Ravy will have gone down with a season ending injury as he compensates for his numerous little injuries but we won't notice as Izzy replaces him.
Drew was bunting for a hit. And I'm sure it was his own idea.
I beg to differ. Kenny Rogers has been the best free agent starter and I wanted to sign him.
I thought "old friend" required ""
Okay, 9th inning, up 5-3. It's time for all of us to hold hands and bow our heads in prayer.
Konerko was a free agent too and he is doing better than Nomar.
Or does he lose that job since he did give up a home run?
And now we'll gain a game on either AZ or SD.
431 Sammy? Is that Saito's nickname?
Tomko with 3ks, and a 4-13 GB/FB ratio in Colorado. Only giving up 3runs pitching like that, in those conditions, is a minor miracle.
They say whats with Tomko --he was no good last year with the Giants, how can he beat the Rockies.!!! He's kicking higher!
I guess we should be pretty thankful for this win.
Saito yeaaaah-would have been my choice.
Right now, I certainly appreciate Little's flexibility--Tracy probably would have had Carrara out there to pitch the ninth.
And really, Little's main problem has been with an awful pen. When Baez started to struggle, it's not as if he had obvious alternatives, and he's now adjusted to Baez's faults.
WWSH
He also seems to have pretty good control. Broxton's problems with that is the main reason I don't want him closing.
How was Saito's stuff in ST? I thought of him as a junkballer until I first saw him pitch, and lo-and-behold he had a decent enough fastball.
WWSH
Which is probably about as much as one can hope from a manager.
What's striking about Little having Saito out there is his dismissive comments regarding Boston's one ill-fated experiment with a closer-by-committee at the beginning of the season. He really was buying the company line that one needed a Proven Closer, which justified that awful trade to get Baez and Carter.
I like how Little has junked that and gone to what Vishall calls an unofficial closer-by-committee, when it became clear that Baez just stank.
WWSH
A closer who has control issues.
A closer who gives up a greater than average amount of home runs.
I don't know the answer to this.
I still think FGL should be renamed FNC.
Well, in Saito's case, I guess we have sample size issues on this point and everything else. Today's HR was forgivable, being in Coors, and with a run to work with. A reliever I think can be aggressive if he has two runs to work with, and doesn't allow baserunners.
WWSH
Saito has pitched a grand total of 20 major league innings. This isn't like Baez, who has pitched for four boring, underwhelming, pedestrian years in baseball's version of Desperation, Nevada. And they've been 20 pretty good innings, and I guess he's the horse we ride, but it's hard to say what kind of pitcher Saito is or what the future will bring.
475 future readers
All his life has he looked away... to the future, to the horizon. Never his mind on where he was. Hmm? What he was doing. Hmph. Adventure. Heh. Excitement. Heh. A (Sabre) craves not these things. You are reckless.
Can we also talk about beaning Bonds now?
Well, the HRs are worrisome, but hopefully this will all be moot when Gagne comes back.
Kent looks like he's returning to form, and if Nomah and Drew healthy, we could actually have a pretty good lineup. Gagne would stabilize the pen and actually give us a pretty good team.
For me at least, the losses have been so demoralizing at times that I'm almost surprised we're only 2.5 back in the standings.
WWSH
But the home run was ok, because we were up by 2 at the time, so the solo homer doesn't hurt. It's better than not going after the hitter, walking people, then giving up the 3 run shot. In that case, you go after the hitter.
that said, imho, considering how many moved ned made this last year, on balance i think hes done remarkably well (although that duaner move hurts pretty bad -- funny how in just three years the pen has gone from invincible to fragile). afterall, this year really doesn't matter, does it? i feel a strange sense of ease as i check the dodger scores as i placidly wait for THE FUTURE to arrive.
for all the talk here of man crushes on nomar, qualified with the obligatory not-that-there's-anything-wrong-with-that mention of straightmancrush, i will use my gender to say i flat-out have a crush on nomar. watch out mia!
My three stars for the game:
1. Tomko - drew the leadoff walk in the 7th, pitched a good game, and what a slide!
2. Nomar - comes through again with a key hit.
3. Saito - nice to see Little leave him in there and nice recovery after giving up the HR.
Honorable mention to Drew for the two-run single extending the lead.
Is it just me or is Rich Donnelly being very agressive sending runners home this year? With Tomko this game and with another play this past weekend it seems he's been sending runners home who be all rights should been out if a decent throw was made.
While opinions on this matter will vary, I'm guessing there are some pitchers/teams out there who would rather walk Bonds every time than have him go 1 for 10 against them, with that "1" being some kind of special homerun.
But the point is, in that case, you go after the hitter, because if you don't, you'll walk people, and give away the game.
Of course, in 1 run games, you may be a little more carful, but in that case, go after the hitter.
A reasonable perspective.
Just a thought.
Plus if he's more careful, won't he walk more people?
I think the problem with a trade for a reliever is that there really aren't many consistently good relievers, except for a few closers. One year a reliever is a good and then the next year he is average at best.
I completley agree and normally I'd be absolutely against it..but our bullpen obviously needs some help. I'm not saying to trade straight up for a reliever, but hoping that if we make another deal (say for LF) maybe we can get a decent reliever as a toss in.
That would be Tony Clark hitting .198.
And Shawn Green (now) hitting .336
Touche :)
Sadly, I think he is just turning into a hitter on the downside of his career.
506 For a hitter on the downside, he's having a pretty good upside this year.
Nobody mentioned that Florida's Odalisizer was "Old Friend" Matt Herges
As someone else pointed out Konerko makes twice as much as Nomar and is signed for a silly amount of years while Nomar is just a one year deal so I stick by my statement that Nomar has been the best positional free agent signing of 2006 at this moment.
Shawn Green is slugging over 600 in the last 21 days. Not sure what you think a singles hitter slugs but it isn't 600.
I wouldn't say he is on a huge upswing though. His OPS last year was the same as it was in 2004. His numbers at the moment (without the OPS plus factored in) are pretty similar to last year (.832 OPS last year, .840 OPS this year).
1. Great slide by Tomko at home plate
2. Dodger sim goes 5-3 in predicting tonights Dodger win.
3. Another NL West team goes above .500 and the Giants are the only team under .500 and just by one game.
4. Spurs blew it in OT by not fouling.
5. Any idea who got to 714 HRs in few at bats? Aaron, Ruth or Bonds?
vr, Xei
Ruth had 8398 ABs, Aaron had approx 11000 ABs (probably more, but I'm being generous.. Bob can probably give a more exact number), and Bonds was at 9140 as of last year.
Ruth: 8399
Bonds: 9211 (and counting)
Aaron: Slightly more than 11288
vr, Xei
Roger Maris had 0 IBB when he hit 61 home runs in 1961. Something about having to pitch to that Mantle guy.
Apparently, baseball is not the only sport with old-school/new-school/stathead issues.
http://tinyurl.com/mp7oo
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.