Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
In the column in which Bill Plaschke underestimates the desire or prudence of Dodger fans who choose to focus on the long term more than 2006, there's this quote from Dodger manager Grady Little after Monday's loss.
"I could be doing better."
It's not clear whether Little meant that he could be feeling better - as in, the losses are getting him down - or whether he meant he could be performing better as manager. Maybe it's both.
In any case, what's striking to me is that I can't really point my finger at anything significant Little has done wrong during the team's worst run in 62 years. A few quibbles, sure, but nothing major.
Unless the Dodgers' listless performance has somehow been fed by Little's personality - a specious claim at best - or he and his staff actually lack the ability to coach, the losing seems to be going on independent of him.
* * *
As for the main thrust of Plaschke's column, which basically advocated going for a 2006 division title at almost any cost, team director of public relations Josh Rawitch had a fair response at Inside the Dodgers:
And finally, after debating his "white flag theory" with Plaschke last night before reading this morning's column, here's what I don't understand. He readily admits that he's "not talking about trading the Russell-Martin-Andre-Ethier-Jonathan-Broxton-Matt-Kemp kind of kids." The problem is, those are the names that people are asking for when it comes to getting an impact player. If Ned, Kim, Roy and the group could get Carlos Lee or Alfonso Soriano or Dontrelle Willis or Barry Zito or pick-your-impact-player in exchange for lower-level prospects or Triple-A guys that aren't valued as highly as these guys, something tells me we'd see those big names in Dodger blue tomorrow morning.
The key quote from Ned yesterday that most every story had with the exception of this article which suggests that we're giving up is this one: "It really is a matter of who is available, and the difference-making players available are very, very few. Because of that, the requests coming back are for multiple (major-league) players. I'm not yet to the point of sacrificing two or three really good players for what probably would be a two-month rental."
Maybe I'm crazy, but I think most Dodger fans agree with that belief. None of us want to wait until next year. No one wants to see this team lose the way it has. We are well aware that in Los Angeles, you don't get rebuilding years and we truly value the fact that you all spend your hard-earned money and time on tickets to come see this team play.
But it seems to me in this instance that Bill had the premise for his article and heard what he wanted to hear on Ned's conference call. Please don't get me wrong - I'm not looking to bash Plaschke. I actually respect him immensely, his years of covering the game and his right to voice his opinion. He's truly one of the best writers in the country. But to leave out one of the main things Ned said because it contradicted his opinion doesn't make sense to me. If we can get a quality starting pitcher for a bag of balls, trust me, Ned will pull the trigger.
The only thing I'd add is that I think that the ability of many Dodger fans' to handle a rebuilding year, as long as it has been spelled out to them, has always been greatly underestimated.
* * *
He also mentions that there's a roundtable with Little, Ned and McCourt tonight on KFWB? Don't think I can listen to it out of the area but if anyone does and hears something worth noting, feel free to pass it along.
If diplomacy is defined as the ability to lie for one's country (or employer, in this case), I suppose he's got it down.
This is the crux of what Plaschke will never be invited to dinner at my house. People who argue using incomplete information and ignore the possible counter-arguments are the worst kind of advocates in the world. In fact, it reminds me of extremism.
That deal would never get by the Trilateral Commmission.
Definitely. I mean, better to rebuild than try to sling a bunch of mud together and hope it dries and becomes a beautiful sculpture. I think as the organization is doing so much to celebrate the 1981 team, they're really thinking that raising your own farm system is the best way to try to win a championship, and I don't think that will be hard for fans to recognize.
I think we'll just have to accept that the Dodgers only had one truly great (or even good) free agent signing, and that was Kirk Gibson.
Atlanta would probably much rather have Broxton anyway, and the answer to that one is NO.
I don't see LA doing it either.
I'm more of a home made salsa guy.
Cubs and Mets 0-0, top of the 10th. And no, I haven't been drinking. Doctor's orders, you know.
Problem with rebuilding next year, is that it could conceivably be 3 90-loss seasons in a row (though they are straight-lining for "only" 86 losses this year, but that number is rising with a bullet). That might be tough to swallow, even if the 3rd one (next year) could be the most intriguing.
Also, the division stinks, which is almost certainly temporary. LA, SD, and AZ all look to be on the rise through the rest of the decade. Passing on a division title through this stretch might end up coming back to haunt.
4/15 - Did I miss something?
Then we just have to get Dodger games broadcasted nationally like TBS . . .
That combined with not running on Lofton last night convinces me of one thing: the Padres aren't very smart.
And the Tomato hammered out a double.
And Peavy has thrown more pitches than Penny in the first.
Good signs all around.
And they had a left side of the infield.
have the Dodgers ever led by more than 2 runs?
And I believe the answer is no.
Plaschke is proof of human perfectibility.
They've also got zero payroll commitments outside of Giles, Peavy, and Hoffman for next year.
The Giants - now there's an old team with a barren system due for a crash.
I just see a whole lot of Lance Niekro's and Merkin Valdez's.
0.1 5 5 4 1
The Giants farm system is getting better but is still considered fairly shallow at the moment. Sanchez, the reliever they called up, is good, and there's Cain, a few hitters here and there, most of their other talent lies in low minors...
He's just getting hit too often. His BAA is .261 this year, up from .217 last year.
As for Alderson and Depo, they are impressive baseball minds, but don't have many pieces work with imo, and San Diego looks to struggle in the next 4-5 years, by my read of it.
The giants have Tim Lincecum now. He'll move fast.
54 It'll be tough for the Giants to improve their farm system when they, seemingly as a matter of strategy, forfeit first-round draft picks. Their first pick in 2005 was #132. In 2006, it was Lincecum at #10, a pick protected from free-agent signing compensation.
If San Diego and Arizona both make the postseason these former Dodgers that were on the 2004 squad will be playing in the postseason of 2006 FOR A NATIONAL LEAGUE TEAM. UGH!!!
Paul LoDuca - Mets
Duaner Sanchez - Mets
Dave Roberts - Padres
Juan Encarnacion - Cardinals
Shawn Green - Diamondbacks
trade Brad Penny too. Another 5 inning start for our horse? :::rolls eyes again:::
He's already hit 18Hrs.
But if that money isn't there, and the minor league system is ashes-to-ashes, dust-to-dust, then I'm in agreement with the consensus here.
anyways, this much closer to David Price!!
David Price.
Roberts got to 2b on a groundball to shallow cf lol.
This is sickening.
See Joey, no anti college bias here!
I'm glad that one of our pitchers has finally called out Lofton. Lofton just waited for the ball to roll to him.
I don't know why we just didn't keep Dan Evans. The only thing keeping us out of the playoffs in the last years of Evans were...
1) Johnson and Schilling
2) Super Juiced Bonds
All you can do is laugh.
Not that anyone cares but I'm postponing my trip to Cincy.
Lofton waited because he limps everywhere. He looked hurt last time I saw him.
(3) The worst offense in baseball history.
Evans? Eh. Not the best judge of talent.
Carlos Zambrano has I think 5HRs.
Those were quieter times.
I haven't really done a ton of research on the draft yet. I usually dont start with that until later.
Can we just let the Depo mistake (if you feel that way) go?
And yes, sell, sell, sell. Get Kenny and Izzy out of here. Useless to us.
I don't know if that's actually a good idea for their development, but it would be fun to root for them.
I guess after today Aybar's OPS will have dipped 80 points during the streak.
If he fires someone, he becomes the center of a story framed by "lousy owner keeps blaming other for his mistakes." If he stays quiet, the focus stays more or less on the field where Plaschke can make DePodesta holdovers like Drew and Penny out to be scapegoats while Colletti and McCourt are largely ignored.
Josh, if you're reading this, please know I'm on your side.
Some of you are having fun baiting other commenters, which is both good and bad.
I think it will be a HOT and LONG summer following our dodgers this year.
I agree, to some degree.
Wonder if he'll bat in the bottom of the 5th?
I was wondering that my self, anybody?
That IS an offensive substitution.
If Rafael Furcal was the consolation prize, is there really anything to be celebrating?
I'm picturing Jon tampering with the traffic signals near his home too just to see what would happen.
http://tinyurl.com/rrmfq
How fitting. Not only does Lofton have as many homers as Drew the past 2 months so does Furcal.
We can be so lucky.
Yeah, but who gets to decide which is which?
And while I'm venting I say give Tomko a shot at the closers role when he returns.
I doubt Tomko would get much work in that role. So I'd endorse it. The less of Tomko, the better.
Did the Padres rip off the Rangers or what?
Chris Young and Adrian Gonzalez..
What else can go wrong? NO please don't speculate.
theres no game on thursday
As a trained pessimist, I can tell you about a million things that could possibly go wrong.
Some of them involve having Dodger Stadium hit by an errant Taepodong 2 missile.
187 - Now you really are searching for things to complain about. Assuming we get the opportunity to use a closer again this year, Saito doesn't deserve a demotion.
190 - Aren't we off Thursday?
What happened to all the Chemistry Ned brought in...?
Wash Fri - Billz
Wash Sat - Lowe
Wash Sun - Hendrickson
at Cin Tue - Penny
at Cin Wed - Billz
I hope I'm right. I really want to see Billz pitch in person. And if I'm really really lucky I'll get to see Brad Penny pitch 6 innings......in person.
When will Hendrickson win his 1st for odgers?
When will Lowe win again?
Stay turned.
He doesn't pitch crappy much
I demand we use adverbs!
WELCOME TO GLENVILLE
Please Drive Friendly
But things aren't lookin up as Ethier goe down.
Clearly, it was Matt Kemp holding the team together. Why cant Placschke write an article mentioning the demotion of Matt Kemp destroying team chemistry?
And the previous day, and the day before that...
9 times this season Mark Hendrickson has pitched more than 6.0 innings.
Our supposed ace has accomplished the feat 6 whole times in 21 starts.
We need an ace or 2 and the answers are Zito/Schmidt. Case closed.
will the dodgers win again?
can we have a taker for Lofton?
can we find a taker for Izzy?
Can we call up LaRoche already?
have a nice fall?!
Adande had a point about paternity leave.
But who has prevented more runs?
Schmidt has been the best at that. Followed by Penny, then Zito, then Lowe.
You need to get you're head cleared.
throw the ball to the catcher
Hendrickson will never win again, Dave Stewart said so.
I looked up Griffey Jr and Bonds, but Barry was born 4 years before Bobby hit the majors, and Ken Griffey Jr was born in the off season. Dave Laroche was not playing or in the offseason when Andy and Adam were born.
Hillenbrand's hit 3-15 so far with SF
Am I the only person who's just gone completely numb watching this tailspin? Granted, it could be the mescaline, but I don't think so.
If the glove indeed contains some kind of magical power, maybe we should trade Izturis and keep the glove. Then we could give it to Aybar and he can start hitting .350 with his glove AND his bat.
They have scored 156. The leader is Philadelphia, with 178. Bringing up the rear is St. Louis, with 114. Haven't yet found all teams' records when trailing after six, but it doesn't seem like the Dodgers are especially poor.
Just throw me a bone here, Bellhorn!
p.s. Plashcke is the reason I cancelled my LA Times subscription
All we need now are Mike Marshall and Billy Ashley!
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B05280LAN1998.htm
Personally, I'm still waiting for Tracy Woodson and Dave Anderson to show up.
And for Nate - Sal's Pals move to NYC
PHILADELPHIA (AP) -- The New York Yankees acquired catcher Sal Fasano from the Philadelphia Phillies on Wednesday for minor league second baseman Hector Made.
Sigh, no one ever looks at the Griddle unless Harold Reynolds or an international Korean sporting event is taking place.
Provided that three other things happen before that one swing of the bat.
Or gag on his silver spoon.
The only thing that surprises me is that Tommy is not involved. But then I guess they do want some other people to talk.
Sorry no transcipt will appear on the Griddle. If you would like a transcipt, please send $10 and an SASE to "McCourt/Colletti roundtable, PO Box 44000, Ansonia Station, New York, NY 10023"
No money orders please.
Thats what I want for the Dodgers.
Is this a longest stretch for a closer.
How much longer before Saito is used in a save situation?
I have no beef with Little. And if he doesn't get to the playoffs, the media can't micro-analyze every pitching change he makes (or doesn't make).
"Dear Bill,
Do you really think that all, most, or even a majority of Dodger fans are so short-sighted and in need of instant gratification that they would rather have a few playoff games this year, most likely a first-round loss, and in return see an undermining of the next few seasons? Perhaps the beachball throwing and drunken fans might be behind this plan, but I have to believe there are many of us that would support seeing young guys play, and know (or at least hope) that a strong foundation is being built.
Hope - that is what sports is all about. In Pittsburgh and Kansas City, there is no hope. None, Zero, Zilch. Here, as soon as the confetti got swept up, there would be much less hope for the next few years should strong minor league prospects be dealt for two months of Greg Maddux, et al in a probably vain attempt to become first-round playoff exiters. In any case, how can you expect to get Soriano, Abreu, Lee, etc for non-Kemp/Ethier/Broxton-type players?
There is little logic to your argument, and it insults many fans who are more than willing to take a medium to long term look at the team. I grew up in Philly and have had pretty much nothing but misery for the last 23 years as a sports fan. But hope - not quick fixes - keeps me coming back every season. Living in LA and becoming a Dodger fan for the past 8 years, I've seen the New York mentality of "never rebuild/always compete" and this approach has been not much better than a sham. Its nice in theory, but other than the Yankees, it just doesn't work. If the team would be honest and admit to a rebuilding effort and then stick to it, I think the fans would enthusiastically support it over the alternate of an unending morass of mediocrity. The real fans would understand, perhaps the beachball throwers would still go to games (or better yet, they would stay home), and all could enjoy some seasons of hopeful prosperity.
Granted, nothing is ever certain, but you can't build a bridge to the future if the foundation and footings ahead of you are not solidly built."
But my list is full.
Even Saito has been affected!
Martinez-Vizcaino-Karros-Martinez-Bonilla
That's a 1-6-3-1-5
Vizcaino-Young-Eisenreich-Bonilla-Vizcaino
That's a 6-4-3-5-6
It's amazing what terrible baserunning will get you.
I typed that with a straight face!
---
"Have you ever seen him speak? The man's literally insane, you can see it in his eyes."
This statement refers to:
A) Grady Little
B) Jim Tracy
C) Ned Colletti
D) Bill Plaschke
E) Lyndon LaRouche
289 - The Tigers are pulling away. I'm saying "Go Twins" or, gulp, "Go Yankees?".
Um...
Yeah.
Any day now. A win will surely come our way. Yep. Any day now. Yepper. Uh huh.
SIGH
Back when I worked for Disney, there was one particular day when the stock took a particularly bad dive -- a major investor sold his shares. We started talking about the terrible price and I got frustrated, asking my boss -- mostly rhetorically -- "How low can it possibly go?"
He responded, "Zero."
I think of that when things get bad. How many games can the Dodgers possibly lose? All of them.
Kent is hurt, he plays 2B
Drew slumping - got banged up on a slide into 2B in Colorado
Nomar gets hurt covering 2B as a firstbasemen on a strange play.
1) I hate Ozzie Guillen, a loudmouth and a jerk
2) The Twins remind me too much of the Braves: seriously flawed teams making it into the postseason because there are too many even stupider GMs in their division (at least this was the case from 2001-2004), getting an automatic 'bye in the playoffs because there's always an obviously better team in some other division.
------
And thus the beatdown ends.
I got that too, I was just so un motivated at the moment.
Any advice?
We'll call him Giovanni Curare from now on.
I'm still partial to Done Giovanni...
When you have Liriano/Santana, along with a young core like Hunter, Stewart, Mauer, Morneau, and Cuddyer..You dont really need much else to contend. The first two are even hurt.
I used to think that the ideal way to build a baseball team was to have above average players at every position. I now think the best way to ensure winning is to just have 4-5 great players, and then just fill in the rest of the roster with guys that are average. 2-3 great pitchers is sometimes all a team really needs.
Now, I do think that they could and should do something with Cruz, Jr. because he is just someone filling out a roster spot and I would not be surprised if Ned tries to find a taker for Lofton (probably after the trade deadline because Kenny will go through waivers)
Past results are not guarantees of future performance.
RB- Scott Elbert
FB- Chad Billingsley
WR1- Joel Guzman
WR2- Preston Mattingly
TE- Clayton Kershaw
LOT- Jonathan Broxton
LOG- Delwyn Young
OC- Russ Martin
ROG-Casey Hoorelbeke
ROT- Jumbo Diaz
I think he's frustrated.
Lots of teams say they are going into a rebuilding mode and marketing the young players.
Look at the websites for the Rockies and Marlins.
Hard to root for that kind of stupidity.
completely agreed.
No way, Broxtons pretty "light" on his feet even though hes 288lbs.
da**, I thought Drew might have broken that awful streak.
He can play both ways.
Billingsley also at Inside LB'er.
Since the June 27 trade...
Dodgers 7 - 18
Rays 9 - 15
I agree. Russ Mart can be a Zibikowski clone, he is THAT edgey.
Are we going 3-4 or 4-3? Ive got the traveling DP circus of jacksonville in Hu and Abreu as my two corners.
I'm gonna listen to that, I wanna get a feel/vibe of management (pr)
PF -- Mark Hendrickson
PG -- Kenny Lofton
Really, why do you say that?
Probably because we have more fun putting them in football positions than watching them play.
That would be a good reason.
Both will be great mlb players, both play at strong college programs with great production and both have impressive tools.
I believe you can register on the KFWB site and listen on line. I know you can't listen to the games on their site, but I believe you can catch everything else.
And yeah, nothing seems to make that Detroit fan happy. Except maybe Texas hold em.
How do these talk show hosts get jobs anyway?
Because they are uneducated about baseball.
They have interviews and send in audition tapes after seeing a want ad most of the time.
They literally think he is the best GM in the league.
----
As for the Dodgers season at this point, I dunno why this dialogue from Futurama came to mind just now:
Professor Farnsworth (on phone): Oh how awful. Did he at least die peacefully?
(pause)
To shreds you say.. tsk tsk tsk. Well, how's his wife holding up?
{pause}
To shreds, you say.
Expansion has made those days a distant memory where finding 3 legit starters on one time is rare and 4 rarer still. I guess the last 4 starts to dominate a season was the Braves in the 90's, with Smoltz, Maddux, Glavine and Avery.
But now, the first caller makes sense.
I agree, i hadn't thought about that. Repko is the wedge buster, SS, and probably half back on offense.
"They are season-worst 7 1/2 games out of first place and 13 games under .500 in Grady Little's first season as manager."
It's just 8 games under .500!
Step away from the radio.
Take a deep breath.
Since you are listening, you should call in. And tell him I said he is a moron.
Is this some weird new reality TV show being promoted?
I'm not mad, I'm just trying to make light of our horrible season.
And as for the Price race, I'm not sure that we can out do the Pirates, Cubs, and Royals.
Who could beat Repko in the 40yrd dash? I bet he could run a 4.6
I guess I was wrong when I said it would take too much to get Choo.
People Against My Circle Foundation
Welcome to the People Against My Circle Foundation, or as I like to call it, the People Against My Circle Foundation. My attorney's the one who convinced me, against my better judgment, to put that more "user-friendly" acronym at the top, as it allegedly will bring more people to my site. Personally, I feel having it there severely undermines my other pending case against the ever-encroaching Acronym Industry via my other group, Americans Against Appalling Acronymization, but since I'm paying him $387 a minute, I will defer to his alleged lawyerly wisdom. But I digress.
Say, isn't there an AT&T ad online with Nomar in it?
"I'm just trying to do something a little different," said Little.
I hope that if I do a really poor job at work, my employer will let me sleep in too.
I'm sure these guys have been at the ballpark plenty during this losing streak. Trying something different sounds pretty reasonable to me.
Were can I look that up? (the at&t show)
.33era 27IP 11H 1ER 5bb 41k
http://www.seehowtheylive.com/miaNomar_baseball.php
I cant see him playing through pain, putting up just average or below average numbers. It might help the team, but it wouldnt help Nomar's free agent status.
Kent has to be ecstatic he signed his deal before the season.
It'd be nice to be able to move one of Ledee, Lofton or Cruz, and get Kemp back up too.
Why not?
It's just like Berkeley in the 1960s!
401 Maybe, but I'd rather they not give away a few of the more valuable veterans. The kids can't do it all. I like his versatility, and people on the team all seem to love him. The others I can bid adieu to.
If we don't sell off guys like Lofton, Baez, Saito, Cruz, Ledee in the next few days I'll be severely disappointed. If we're not offering arbitration then there's no reason NOT to trade them.
I don't think "Lony Gwynn" is catching on with the masses.
Sal needs to go to a team that appreciates his manly italian facial hair.
Maybe not, but at least our battlecry will be heard (or just my battlecry).
now, if it brings us a young stud pitcher, do you do it?
Yes.
This season is over.
Bottom line we have no starting pitching prospects coming up anytime soon, and we need 2 starting pitchers for next season and i mean legit starting pitchers, not tomko types.
Either sign both zito and schmidt or sell nomar for a legit starting pitcher and sign 1 of zito or schmidt.
I'm not worried at all about the offense in the future, but this franchise needs legit starting pitching for the future.
And you can never have enough pitching, so there shouldn't be any discussion about blocking elbert or whoever else.
Well, it happened. Now what? The season seems to have collapsed inward upon itself, like a building scheduled for demolition. Several days ago I described the sensation of watching the Dodgers's season slip between our fingers. Now I feel as though the whole thing is pretty hopeless. This actually feels even worse than last season at this time. Glad Flanders is getting a free pass, I guess. Everyone deserves a couple of years to iron out their Master Plan, no? No? Only certain people? Hello? Anyone home?
Grrr.
2. What does the gambling term "to martindale" mean, or did I miss the joke?
Managers don't mean the difference between good and horrible. They just don't. And the Dodgers, at this point, are horrible.
There's a picture of Sal on the YES website.
Alternatively, you can watch ESPN and watch the Yankees play. Fasano is starting.
Citing Gibson, as an example of how not to treat JD Drew, doesnt seem appropriate.
The Martingale betting strategy is to double your bet each time you lose until you finally win a bet. The theory being sooner or later you have to win a bet. The problem is that depending on your bankroll, you may run out of money quickly before the tide turns. Plus, if you actually do win a bet in time, all you've won is the amount of the original bet. It's a classic losers strategy.
I'm tanned, rested, and ready for a comeback!
As locked in as Johnson is right now, not the decision I'd make. Kearns has a pretty darn good eye.
Now a merch-sales-inducing uniform redesign? Sure.
Right?
Adrian Beltre plays everyday through pain. No wonder his teams always win?!
Likewise, Drew never plays through pain.
Its of course no surprise that Beltre is in the playoffs every year, and Drew is sitting at home...
Er no...
http://www.seehowtheylive.com/miaNomar_baseball.php
If I recall correctly from the time of the move, the Rangers own the rights to the "Senators" name, and thus there would have to be some sort of compensation.
Strangely enough, at least according to Wikipedia, the original Washington Nationals became the Minnesota Twins, so I don't know about that part of things. :)
53
What the ...
Please. I beg of you. The Dodgers are dead, long live the Dodgers.
War is peace. Love is hate. Buy is sell.
It ain't no country club either
This is LA!
I didn't realize that Dodger fans were so stupid.
And now on Line 4, we have Bill Bavasi! What's up, Bill?
"Well, I wanted to talk about Willie Bloomquist with Ned, but everytime I call, he's out clubbing with Andy Friedman. Ned, what about that Bloomquist/Guzman deal we talked about?"
"Can we get cash considerations?"
One wonders if Jim Bowden is thinking, man, if I can just add a couple of pieces, might be able to make a run here.
"We always want to win"
"We're as disappointed as you are"
"We want to play Championship Baseball in every day and every way"
"I've talked to every major league team"
"I'm flying to Acapulco for a month with Andy in October, since we don't have anything else to do."
Well, OK, I made that last one up, but the others capture the general tenor of the conversation. It's obviously a cocoon not unlike those the major political parties have built up around themselves, since the first caller gave a very sincere, heartfelt plea that the Dodgers not do anything stupid, and the host twisted it into a desperate plea for Ned to work his miracle magic.
No one on the Sox last year was a superstar.
I would agree with that.
Shaq>>>>>>3 marginal players.
Albert Pujols>>>>>3 marginal players.
Professional baseball and basketball is more about quality, and less about depth.
Football is the only sport where you really need good players at every single position in order to win consistently.
Well, maybe.
It's probably not a good day, week, or month to try and figure out the Dodger Thoughts equivalent )(not that it takes much figuring).
Come Monday
Hello Jose Mesa, Roberto Hernandez, and/or Greg Maddux
Good bye Delwyn Young, Greg Miller, Tony Abreu
Shaq>>>>>>3 marginal players.
Albert Pujols>>>>>3 marginal players.
Professional baseball and basketball is more about quality, and less about depth.
Football is the only sport where you really need good players at every single position in order to win consistently.
Well, great pitching + decent power offensive players that play good defense>>>>>>>> Pujols with mediocre pitching.
Just look at the Tigers.
Did she pronounce Betemit correctly?
-The season is over, need to think to the future
-Should have kept Cody Ross over Jose Cruz
-Any chance of trading for Wilson Betemit (I like that idea)
Ned's response:
Cruz had more of a proven track record
Ned is getting hot.
JtD and LaRoche have not come up once.
I believe she nailed the word "Betemit."
That was a good phone call. I wonder how she got through.
I really can't blame Ned for choosing Jose Cruz over Cody Ross.
1Q: Repko looks good in a skirt and pom-poms and he's probably easy. Why don't we play him and bench all those old, married hags?
1A: We all love Repko and all our problems basically stem from him being on the DL.
2Q: Will you move Spring Training?
2A: We love Vero Beach. We hate Vero Beach. We'll let you know.
3Q: We're not done. The 1988 Dodgers were 47-55 and look what they did. Nobody cares about the next 60 years as long as you leapfrog the eight teams in the standings ahead of us and win the world series.
3A: [Not answering question] We would trade for a stud #1 pitcher but there isn't one out there.
I'm guessing it went something like this:
"Ned is doing a great job. I am so glad that Stuipdesta is gone. Lofton's leadership has been invaluable to the team. Nomar was the best pickup of the offseason. How did Ned steal Hendrickson from the Devil Rays? Go Izzy!"
A: I tried to trade Odalis Perez for as long as I've been here. I couldn't find a taker in Major League Baseball, so I finally traded him to Kansas City.
Q: So dumb that only Bill Plaschke could understand it.
A: Even dumber.
I want my 1 hour back.
Obviously Steve was being facetious, but for infomational purposes, the 1988 Dodgers were 59-43 at this point in the season.
They lost Game 102 14-6 to the Astros.
Danny Heep pitched the last two innings.
A: Even dumber.
We have no secrets here. I laughed.
So Ned didnt address the Hendrickson for Navarro trade? I'd love to hear his reasoning for Martin being granted an untouchable, and Navarro dealt for a D-Ray, when the players are so very similar.
They really took a call about Loduca and Beltre? Some LA fans really dont deserve a winning team. Or a high school diploma, for that matter.
Mediocre? I'd give them a little more and say decent. Sure their defense is great, which contributes a great deal to their league-best .249 opponent's batting average and 3.70 team ERA. But they're also tied for 7th with least HR allowed (101 over 906 IP), and their BB/9 is the 7th best in the bigs. Their K/9 rate is middle of the run, granted, but I wouldn't mind that staff. I especially like Justin Verlander in that rotation. Their pitching staff is also tied for second with only 8 blown saves.
The Minnesota Twins, though, have only blown 5. With Nathan in the bullpen, and with Liriano and Santana in that rotation, and
with the only pitching staff that has a TEAM K/BB of over 3, I'd pick Minnesota.
Oddly enough, the Cubs' K/9 is actually better (7.54 vs 7.41 for Minnesota). Too bad their BB/9 is 4.22 to Minnesota's 2.19.
I tried to be patient with him, but my patience with him, just from a personal standpoint, and without regard to his baseball philosophy (which remains in question), is up.
If you can't even summon the courage to defend not signing the reigning American League champion for organization killing two years later, you have a problem.
??????????
Is that a reference to Vladimir Guerrero?
Yo, Adrian!
Is he out too?
523 -- When asked the final question, McCourt said something like "I can't get into another man's mind and figure out what he was doing or thinking at any time" which is absurd. On one hand he's supposed to be this hands-on, excited owner who is bringing "Championship Baseball" to Los Angeles and then on the other hand, he can't even summon up the gumption to say "Hey, and on Beltre, you're pretty much up in the night, because we all sat around and debated for weeks, and finally we just decided to go another way, and gosh darn it if he hasn't turned out to be a gigantic pantload on the Seattle roster." It was a cowardly answer, made more so because of all his big talk about accountability and courage.
Mediocre pitching? They have the best staff ERA in baseball. Sure, the Angels have great starting staff, and the Tigers don't exactly have Santana-Lirano, but I'd take Bonderman-Verlander right after the Twins.
And please don't tell me that Verlander, who has a 2.69 ERA, only 111 hits in 130.1 innings, and 30 K's in his last 36.2 innings, is mediocre.
Seeing him pitch, I'm just amazed he doesn't K 10 per 9, he can throw 100 MPH with movement, has an incredible curve, and a great change.d
2006 Verlander: 6.08 K/9, 2.44 K/BB, .82 HR/9, 1.21 GB/FB
I miscalculated Weaver's K/BB, but both pitchers are very similar.
If anything, their PR people deserve a raise for keeping the heat off them.
Eventually, even the best spin artist will be of no assistance.
531 The reason they have the lowest ERA is because their defense makes their mediocre pitchers look better.
What about hits per 9?
Look, Verlander has been K'ing people better lately, at 7.48 per 9. Besides, this is Justin's rookie year no? He's got the stuff to be a great K pitcher.
But in any case, Verlander is NOT mediocre, and has prevented many runs.
Merely, eh?
Was that caller Danica?
Inquiring minds want to yada yada yada...
Let me make this clear. I'm not saying Verlander=Weaver. Justin Verlander will be one of the best pitchers in baseball.
I'm saying Justin Verlander, in his age 21 season, should have a much higher ERA according to his perheprials.
And why did Colletti refuse to offer Dessens arbitration, only to trade for him less than a year later, when his price had gone up, despite the fact that he hadn't pitched any better?
That doesn't make him mediocre.
I kid, Ken. You're a gem.
Or making good pitches. If you have mediocre stuff, aren't you going to have more hits than a guy with great stuff like Verlander?
Here's the AL league averages:
6.38 K/9
2.00 K/BB
1.14 HR/9
But his ERA must be way over 120+.
Look, he might just be average if you look just at periphials or whatever, but you can't call him that if you look at reality, like runs prevented. What, are you gonna call Maddux mediocre in his prime now?
Is it not clear to all that this trade was made not because Colletti recognized Dessens' undeniable talent and his own mistake in allowing Elmer to escape unarbited, but rather because Odalis Perez stunk out loud and had become, in Steve's words, a "gigantic pantload" on the Dodger roster?
Maddux wasn't mediocre in his prime becuase he had 4-5 K/BB and .25 HR/9 ratios. That means stud through and through.
would that be Vlad? i missed the "interview"
But its just rare for a pitcher to be dominant, but not K people. There are a few left handers that can do it, but they are few and far between.
Thats why I'm very concerned with Billingsley's K rate. It was ok in the minors, but at the MLB level he just isnt getting the strike outs. To be a #1, 90% of pitchers need those K's. They cant rely on inducing weak contact against every hitter, and letting their defense do all the work. Just doesnt happen often.
A pitcher that doesnt give up HR's, and doesnt BB people, will be probably very successful, regardless of the k's.
Sounds like The Education of Little Tree is still stuck in neutral.
Derek Lowe was really good for a period of time and he didn't strike people out. The aforementioned Greg Maddux as well.
Jon, could you provide a meal plan for July 31?
If your pitcher gives up an average amount of HR/9, an average amount of BB/9, an average amount of K/9, but somehow is giving up a very low H/9 number, something is wrong. Its either luck, or its the defense behind the pitcher that is playing great.
You suggest that Verlander might just be making great pitches, and inducing weak contact, and thus thats why his H/9 is low. However, if that were true--that Verlander was inducing weak contact---that should also show up in his HR/9. If you are getting weak contact all the time, your HR/9 would be extremly low too. Right? However, Verlander is giving up HRs, around the same number as what Weaver did in 2004.
Its basically Verlander's defense and ball park, that is making him appear to be better than how he's actually pitching.
The Angels might be one bat away from making a serious run though Colon went down again today with a problem in his right elbow.
Just for the sake of thinking of something happier, which year was better, Koufax '63 or Koufax '65? The homer rate in 63 was better, and he had 11 shutouts, but he had 382 strikeouts in 65.
Not going to trade the future. Mentioned specifically Ethier, Martin, and Billingsley. I took it as clear confirmation that they were off the table. Only one "difference-maker" out there (did not say which one). Would trade the moon for a #1 starter.
Do they now think this season is lost if you read between the lines of their companyspeak?
Yes
...bought to you by Brad Stapleton, President. Woody, you were so much more than a pretty decent lefty. You were the 10th winningest lefty from 2001 to 2003. And you were my favorite Giant, behind Jeff Kent, superstar.
If that doesn't merit a collectible plate from the Franklin Mint, I don't know what does.
but they do have Saunders.
Verlander is having an equivalent season to Jeff Weaver right now. However, since Verlander is young, it is highly likely that he will be much better in future seasons. Justin Verlander does not equal Jeff Weaver.
If you go to Angels.com and click on J Weaver on their depth chart, Jeff Weaver shows up. I clicked than and I wondered, how did his ERA get to 6 something?
I understand Martin being off the table at this point. He's the only good catcher the Dodgers have left.
However, I dont think Billingsley or Ethier should be untouchable. I think they both should be on the table. I'd deal both of them for Carlos Zambrano and not think twice about it, if Ned was serious about acquiring a #1 starter.
It seems like we do this every month, but my untouchables would be Matt Kemp, Broxton, Martin. All the other prospects would be on the table. Of course, I'd deal anyone for Miggy Cabrera. But if we're just talking value, I value Broxton/Kemp moreso than Ethier/Billz at this point.
I call that equivelant, you may not. I don't want to argue semantics.
I assume you're talking about the cowardice surrounding the Vlad non-signing. Yes, the problem there is that he can't say why he didn't sign Vlad; the bottom line is that he was Selig's sock puppet, which he can't come out and say in so many words. Don't ever expect an apology for that.
593 -- It's not semantics. You're wrong.
...and did I see Gavin Floyd up there somewhere?? He, and perhaps this discussion about Verlander, reminds me of the time ESPN's power rankings boldly predicted that "Brandon Duckworth will win a Cy Young award in the next 5 years"...
Am I off-base about seeing Broxton's K numbers and thinking he has alot more talent and upside than Billingsley does?
That was about Alex Cora, right?
I agree about Ethier. I would trade him if we could get a great player in return. Elbert, Dewitt, LaRoche, Billingsley, and Martin are the ones that are almost untouchable in my mind.
You are not wrong often, but on this one, you are wrong.
Yeah, but he is a reliever, but if he started I'd like him more.
Not all plates increase in value; some go down.
Good post by you at Dodgers.com. But I'm not sure you're going to get anywhere with that crowd. Keep fighting the good fight though.
As far as Zambrano, I would offer Bills and Guzman and throw in one of our spare parts, Ledee, Cruz instead of Ethier, I like that kid's upside!!
I agree. If we could get Zambrano for less than Billz/Etheir, by all means that would be splendid. However, I'm thinking of a fair trade that the Cubs might accept, and Billz/Ethier might do it if for instance Zambrano has told the Cubs he wont resign with them. I'm not sure if he's mentioned that however.
I can't disagree with that.
But is anyone looking for a shortstop/speedy leadoff guy? It would be more useful to put Izturis at short and then a more offensively charged 3B in.
I'll try to get inside Colletti's head. He doesn't know if the division is salvageable or not, so he wants to watch this weekend. If they sweep and everyone else in the NL West falters, then they're close enough to have "pressure," which he doesn't want for LaRoche or Aybar at 3rd. But if they're still 6 games out or more come Sunday (I'd say 90% chance), he'll be willing to bring up more of the kids from AAA, and thus trading whichever shortstop helps him the most.
Izturis' BA is now really low, so Furcal, even with the higher salary, is a more useful offensive player, and his defense has been less problematic since he has gradually gotten over some nagging injuries. Thus Furcal is shipped out, I don't know where but somewhere and probably with cash. Prospects would be amazing, but he'll see what he can do. Then Izzy is back at short, Laroche or Aybar take 3rd, and Kent gets back.
This is more my thinking, but he'd also send Drew (especially if he hits a homer this weekend) to the Yankees for some prospect they've got (they've got a couple, supposedly), I don't know who, and bring up another Vegas headliner of your choice.
Of which Ned is no doubt well aware...
I'll bet there's a Kirk Reuter plate in there...
well I did like his 18 pitch at bat about 2 year ago.
were is Rueter anyways? i remember the last time I atended one of his games (2 years ago)
Drew - 89
Nomar - 79
Baez - 518
then me seeing him 2 years ago is that much more important.(the Dodgers won that game so whoo hoo!)
Your right of course but don't you think that while Broxton does not have the ability of Billingsly, that he did show enough during his days as a minor league starter that he would be more valuable as a starter then a setup man? While Billingsly supposedly has Number 1 stuff, you'd think that Broxton could be a 3 or 4 and that certainly has more cache then a setup man.
Hopefully this is a one year deal but it bugs me that 3 of the best arms in system(Kuo, Miller, Broxton) are being used in relief where repetition of innings would seem to be the best path.
vr, Xei
Beltran-28
Delgado-25
Wright-21
Nady-14
Nomar-12
Valenin-11
Floyd-10
Drew/Kent-9
I'd love to come up with a pithy, intelligent remark, but I am unable to do so. Hitting the ball out of the yard is premium, and we suck at it. Horribly. Look at that. Our home run leader is fifth on the list. Hilarity ensues. The Mets have a seven hitter who produces more than we do. Can we please just wave the white flag, trade Nomar, Kenny, and Co., and prepare for next year?
And we can hire Tobias to do his "We're having a fire...sale..." routine, complete with his stop-drop-and-roll edition of "Amazing Grace."
Is Baez volunteering himself?
http://tinyurl.com/h4ys3
Plaschke's article isnt worth being linked.
Its litterbox material.
http://tinyurl.com/rkbfc
Plaschke beats up on Penny, again, this morning. I wonder if Rawitch will spend a few paragraphs calling Plaschke nicer than Jesus, and cuter than garbage bag full of kittens.
"You know, the team is a bad team," Perez said of the last-place Royals. "[But] I could be happy there because I can be the ace on staff or one of the good guys on the staff."
What a guy. He will be sorely missed.
my understanding is that Broxton dosn't throw as hard when he starts, & Kou is starting already no?
http://tinyurl.com/qzu38
I gotta think at the very least it equals retroactive 15 day DL.
Brad Penny is being paid like an ace, and he needs to act like it
Really? The going rate for an "ace" these days is $5.5 million/year?
Instead, in a twist worthy of "24," Peripherals died!
Now what?
http://tinyurl.com/e5o73
Sounds like he at least is now able to both apologize and talk thiugs through. I dunno if Penny is paid like an ace or not, but he is supposed to be the Dodgers ace and needs to pitch like it, regardless of who is playing CF or not. Giving up two big hits to the pitcher is inexcusable, don't care how good a hitting pitcher Peavy is. But I think he can get through this and be solid next time around.
Has he gone insane? Doesn't he get it? WE ARE THROUGH, WE ARE DONE, THE SEASON IS OVER!!!!!!!
And we don't get a good d* about the angels, and thoese 2 month's of irrelevance will pay off into 10 years of greatness!!!!
dose he pitch better in Aug?
The mark of the beast
I think we all agree that Plaschke is the devil, so DT'ers agree in two things we hate Plaschke & the Giants.
vr, Xei
We should be building towards 07 and 08 as we just don't have it for this year barring a miracle. I am troubled by all of the prospects Ned is giving up when we are getting very little in return. I'd like to see him trade for the future instead, but I don't think he has it in him. I think he'd rather give up prospects for more mediocre veterans to please people like Plaschke and pretend we are doing something to save the ship.
Let's not forget that just three weeks ago, Ol' Bill YET AGAIN lamented the allegedly franchise-crushing July 2004 trade that brought Penny, the Dodgers' best starting pitcher, over from the Marlins.
It's 2006, Bill.
Once I'm there, I'm drawn to it, like a moth to a blowtorch.
I'm very lucky. My wife is forgiving and patient; she loves going to the games with me; and she is impervious to BS. She is the perfect Plaschke filter.
Hey, Bill, Russ Martin - you remember him? He's better.
(I do think you're right, OZ - Plaschke is stuck in 2004... It'll be 2020, the Dodgers will be saying goodbye to Martin and Kemp and Billz and whoever, and he'll write a column lamenting about how they could have had 48-year-old LoDuca behind the plate).
The best 3B for the Dodgers with a VORP of 3.5 is Willy Aybar (still the 8th worst player, 3B is the worst position for the Dodgers) and considering that's only with about 6 weeks of games, it is possible had they just handed him the job over the winter, he could have moved even higher.
I agree with the "getting very little in return" part of this sentence, but the "all the prospects Ned is giving up" is untrue.
Edwin Jackson is no longer a prospect. He is a mop-up relief pitcher for the second-worst team in baseball, the guy they leave in to take a beating. Tiffany's not much of a prospect anymore either due to injury. Baez might not be great, but I predict he will be traded this week, and what the Dodgers get back will be of more value than Jackson and Tiffany.
Navarro you could make a case for, but he was redundant on this team. Branch Rickey would've gotten more for him, but not much more.
The two who went to KC in the epic Dessens deal were not prospects.
Really, when this season's over, the story will be the same as last season. The Dodgers have a core group of prospects who are mostly not ready to play in the majors. Management's strategy is to to tap dance until the prospects arrive in full by 2007 or 08. The tap dancers look okay at the start of the season, but begin to wear out around June or July. The media and fans get restless.
The GM has a gut check in mid-July. Trade just a couple prospects for a name player to keep the media at bay, maybe win a few more games? Sounds soooo easy.
Last year, DePo passed the gut check, but paid for it with his job. (He made mistakes that contributed to his downfall as well.)
This year, I predict Colletti will also pass the gut check, and get to keep his job.
As a result, it can be tought to compare two players with significant differences in playing time. However, there's a VORPr, or VORP rate, measurement that describes VORP more like batting average or ERA making it easier to compare players with dissimilar playing time.
Wow, sounds like Ned's kind of player! :)
Of coures Ned and Jim Bowden will both have a lot of time to talk to this weekend.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news;_ylt=At4LC8SgY.D4bvJBH.tNgF0RvLYF?slug=ys-mlbrumors&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
When he's a free agent in the offseason.
For example, I determined that if you repeated the Baez trade seven times, if even one of the prospects panned out, you'd end up behind in the end. This was giving Edwin Jackson an 85% chance of never contributing a thing at the major league level.
Sure, losing these guys probably won't hurt, but if you're going to make moves like Ned makes, you have to be 100% sure they'll never be a useful major league player.
"A few clubs have surprised me calling for Carlos (Lee). I'm not sure if they're interested, but they're in the same division and want to make sure that if somebody else gets him, they're paying a steeper price." - Brewers GM Doug Melvin (aren't those two first names? =P).
I'm wondering (hoping) that Ned is just trying to push the price for Lee, without actually trying to get him - if there are that many teams actively pursuing him the cost probably will be too much for a deal to really work out in the Dodgers' favor.
If another team traded for Carlos, would Carlos be any more likely to sign with that new team over any other?
My gut says no -- that Carlos will sign with whichever team offers him the most money -- but I can't help but wonder if there would be some sort of inside track or something, and I wonder what that's worth, if anything.
Here's wjat needs done. We keep Penny and Lowe and sign Zito/Schmidt. Grear starting pitching is key.
We trade JD Drew, Joel Guzman, and another prospect to the Yankees for a worse prospect the Guzman and the other we are giving away. We do this so the Yankees will take on Drew's whole contract.
We sign Lee next offseason
Rotation
1. Schmodt
2. Zito
3. Lowe
4. Penny
5. Billz
Lineup
1. Furcal - ss
2. Loney - 1b
3. Lee - lf
4. Ethier - rf
5. Kent - 2b
6. Kemp - cf
7. LaRoche - 3b
8. Martin - c
I still feel sad that Mueller didn't stay healthy because I really liked him and thought he'd help the Dodgers a lot. Of course, I, and no one really, should be surprised that his knees gave out and that was it, so in hindsight it seems like a dumb move but I was looking forward to Mueller, and hopeful. I do hope we trade Baez because I think we could actually get something good in return. In a Carlos Lee (sign-and-)trade package perhaps? That's the only way I'd like to add Lee, is if we could sign him to a long term deal. 2 month rental for top prospects doesn't seem worth it.
But even that deal I described may only result in one or two more wins.
This may please some of you out there, I sure sounded like the Dodgers will be big players in acquiring a Zito or Schmidt, Ned made it pretty clear, you can't win without one of those guys (not sure if that is a shot at Penny, I doubt it, he was talking about making a deal now and the only thing he would really look at would be a deal for a No. 1 guy)
So in Nate's and my best case scenario, the Dodgers fall under the 16th pick so if they sign a premier free agent, they don't lose their number one pick.
One thing, if Drew opts out, does anyone know can the Dodgers offer him arbitration, thus securing some draft picks?
Yeah, is there a way to trade for someone like Lee and then have him sign an extension, or is that just wishful thinking on my part? Otherwise, I think you're right, Colletti may just be trying to jack up his asking price. Let the Cards and Astros bankrupt their futures for him.
Wet kiss of a profile of Mark Lerner (son of Ted) that ran in today's Post. http://tinyurl.com/fv7ma
I will try to do some research but when was the last time the Dodgers got a minor league player who has played as well as he has in the last 30 years?
Bob, anyone.
23.83
23.25
18.92
20.10
19.06
19.31
13.86
I guess he magically figured out how to hit HRs more frequently, right before he's due for free agency. Neato.
698 I don't know - I was used to them being the one trading those away instead of acquiring them.
I'd like to see if Ned could send Izturis, Ledee or Cruz, and maybe Guzman for someone who can actually contribute in 07/08 whether it is a top prospect or a solid player. Not sure if that would be possible, but I know there are those on this board that feel Izturis has decent trade value at this point.
We should all want Matt Kemp's first 6 years in the Majors somewhat resemble that table.
Whether he can sustain that HR rate is a valid question, but there's no reason to expect that he won't continue to hit at least 1 HR every 20AB, on average. So he has value.
http://mozmonkey.com/tinyurl/
;-)
Yes, but he'll be paid based on his 2006 HR rate, which he likely won't sustain. Whoever signs him will likely be stuck with a 20 AB/HR guy for the cost of a 13 AB/HR guy.
To me, those numbers represent a significant red flag.
But then he made this deal with St. Louis, Mark Mulder for Dan Haren, Kiko Calero and Daric Barton. Certainly just Haren might have been equal value for Mulder, to get the other two guys plus the fact that Mulder is out and is a free agent, score this one for the A's. The more you look at this deal, only the Nathan, Liriano trade and the Kazmir trade could rank above it, though Mulder is a better player than A.J. and Victor Zambrano.
My point is that, you could go and find deals like this for every general manager in every sport, I always think the best deal is one where there are no clear winners or losers but instead both teams address needs.
The only deal, though again I understood it based on the players he had and the reports coming out regarding their health, is the deal that sent Duaner out of town but with Gagne saying he was on track and with Yhency coming off being the top relief pitcher in the Dominican Winter League (he had great numbers), it sure seemed that the Dodgers were set in that department.
I'm sorry, sir, we're out of the bacon-wrapped filet tonight. Can I interest you in an old shoe?
Close to 40HR is not an unreasonable expectation for Carlos Lee in 2007. I suspect that most scouts would agree.
You pretty much KNOW that Lee will hit 30 HR a season for at least the next few seasons. That certaintly is worth something. He's not a proverbial "question mark".
I agree. We need to get a quality starter far and above anything else (really we need 2). We don't have any other options in the minors right now.
On another note, Jeff Passan of Yahoo Sports is saying he thinks the Angels can get Tejada for Joe Saunders and Brandon Wood. Stoneman might actually do this one. This would put the Angels as the team to beat in the AL West if they aren't already. The only thing that might hold this up is if they need Saunders to replace Colon in the rotation, which is possible as Bartolo looks bad and his arm looks like it is about to fall off.
I don't like trading prospects, but in this case the Angels need the bat.
I guess we'll see what happens. But if I were a GM, I would have misgivings about players who suddenly got a lot better during their contract year, even if they had always been pretty good in the past.
I'd argue that you want to buy players' baselines. Performance among top players can fluctuate between "very good" and "great", so make sure you're at least getting "very good", even if you're paying for "great".
It's the players that fluctuate between "OK" and "good" that you want to keep away from your bank account.
You will probably be able to fill in some other spots to have a full roster less than 100 million and maybe you have to that deal because Vlad isn't getting younger.
The more I think about it, I might do it, though Wood is a consenus top 5 prospect in all of baseball.
So there was something wrong with you when you said you wanted to get rid of Penny bluetahoe.
--
that's the kind of thought that will get you fired. Just ask Plaschke.
Another possibility is to get Aramis Ramirez from the Cubs. Not sure what they would have to give up though for him. I generally don't like trade deadline deals, but I think the Angels are in a unique position where they should probably do a deal to get some hitting. They have plenty of prospects and really just need a hitter to take off as a team.
On Brandon Wood, I agree it would be hard to give up on him. Just looking at his stats though, I think of Dallas McPherson with all of those strikeouts. That may be unfair.
I don't think it is a problem blocking the left side of the infield until 08 as they don't really have any options in the minors at this point. I wouldn't count on McPherson at all at third and don't think Wood would be ready until 08 if they keep him.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.