Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
It's been a really busy week, punctuated by car trouble, so I appreciate your patience with my lack of compelling content here. Hope to get things back in gear in the next day or two.
394 Or a trade. But Pierre won't be traded (alas). Ethier likely won't either. Gonzo certainly won't since he's only on a 1 yr contract anyway and has been productive at times. So it'd have to be another position player. You're right, basically, there's not room for him right now. I wish there was one more Wilson Valdez we could DFA. ;-) (Well there is Martinez... but they probably like having that extra infielder for safety.)
It seems like Kemp's time is more likely next year, when Gonzo is gone.
1. Which league will win the first interleague go around?
2. Next to be called up?
a. Matt Kemp
b. Yhency Brazoban
c. James Loney
d. Tony Abreu
e. Write-in candidate
3. Next Dodger to hit a home run.
a. Jeff Kent
b. Olmedo Saenz
c. Nomar Garciaparra
d. Wilson Betemit
e. Andy LaRoche
f. Luis Gonzalez
g. Anyone else.
Things always change and sometimes it is hard to envision the change. Just look at any Dodger lineup on May 1st and then again on Aug 15th and it is always shocking when you see who is playing and who isn't. My gut still tells me that Kemp will be playing almost full time by Aug 15th.
Pierre/Gonzo/Clark seem locked into their spots no matter what they do.
1. Always AL until the NL proves they have gotten better.
2.Yhancy
3. Nomar
1. AL
2. B
3. Furcal
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-freeway18may18,0,2050002.story?coll=la-home-sports
Apparently, Oakland doesn't consider itself desperate.
I think it's got to be Juan Pierre. How many people have their names mentioned in a song?
Betemit has played short before, it wouldn't kill us if he played there once in a great while. Sure, this could result in some odd defensive alignments if Kent and Furcal get hurt at the same time, but what are the odds of that?
He is what he is. A pinch hitter, pinch runner, and defensive replacement. The perfect 5th outfielder.
I also would like to see a 4 man OF rotation with Andre/Pierre/Gonzo/Kemp. There is absolutely no reason any of our current outfielders need to be starting virtually every game.
Hendrickson is probably a more valuable asset, he is lefthanded, he is still a couple of years away from free agency, his contract isn't horrible.
Tomko, they would have to probably pay most if not all of his contract plus his buyout and probably get less in return.
It appears that Chad is going to stay regardless of what happens but Kuo could certainly see the lights of Vegas again.
Kemp, Gonzo, Ethier, Pierre.
Clark I think is more of a defensive sub/bat off the bench/occasional starter. It makes a lot of sense to rotate the top 4 guys- based on matchups and get them all 4 or 5 starts/week. I don't think they will put Kemp in Clarks current roll b/c he needs the regular ABs.
Some people seem to think that no matter what Gonzo and Pierre do they will start the whole year, but I don't know if that is the case/not sure where that is coming from. I don't see Grady or Ned married to any one or not willing to make needed changes, even if it takes them a little longer to get there. I guess time till tell.
I don't agree on Tomko. He is not pitching like Odalis was when we had to make that deal. Pitching is such a mess right now with so many teams I think when he's moved we won't be paying any of his salary. JMO
When was the last time the Dodgers needed a third catcher? I'm willing to punt every 500th game if it means the Dodgers have a stronger team.
If injuries happen, the call ups will be:
1B: Loney
2B/SS: Abreu
3B: LaRoche (already here)
LF/CF/RF: Kemp, then Loney.
SP: Chad/Kuo (on roster), Stults/Houlton
RP: Brazoban/Meloan/Miller
We may not like everything on the big league club but that is some impressive depth in system
And there's nothing wrong with that bench 17 - just, again, I don't see the Dodgers going with just one backup infielder. Unless one of the other OFers could also play the infield, but they can't. Kemp is clearly "better" than Martinez but again, the team could leave themselves vulnerable in a long extra inning game if they had only one backup infielder.
I wonder if the Dodgers will get anything for Valdez, or if he'll end up back in Vegas.
They need a 3b before they need an upgrade in LF. The normal outfield for the Twins is Cuddyer/Hunter/Kubel and while Kubel started off slow he will outhit any of the Dodger outfielders by the end of the season.
Punto however is a fine utility player who is miscast as a started 3b. That is where they need to upgrade and Betemit would be a perfect fit but the Twins have nothing we need since they will need Baker/Garza/Slowry to replace Ponson(already released)/Ortiz(soone to be released)/Crain(TJ surgery).
Of course if the Dodgers decided to pull the trigger now due to encouraging reports about Schmidt, Brazoban's effectiveness in Vegas and Chad's and Kuo being already in LA, then I think they would probably not have to pay as much salary because they would be dealing from strength.
Also, Abreu > Martinez, too, but that wouldn't open up a spot for Kemp.
I wonder who the Dodgers would want back from the A's if they did trade a reliever to them. Bring back Antonio Perez! :-/
I thought it was a lousy article and could have been so much more if the writer really wanted to delve into it. That is the problem with major LA newspaper sports articles, not enough depth or research.
12 - People discussed that last night. I haven't linked to it for what I think are obvious reasons, but this is the quote that bothered me the most.
"I don't understand," he said. "I worked my butt off for it. I know a lot of people think I don't deserve it. It doesn't matter to me what they think. Guys make twice as much, and nothing is ever said about their contracts."
I mean, I understand why he says this - he's got to stand up for himself, but it's just so problematic.
Earlier, there's this from Shaikin:
"Yet, if you base the early returns on the standings, the investments are paying off. The Angels are in first place with Matthews, the Dodgers are in first place with Pierre, and isn't that the point?"
The Dodgers are in first place with me as a fan and my kids waking up feisty and the skies being hazy this morning. There's stuff that's relevant, and stuff that's irrelevant. Pierre is not relevant to the Dodgers being in first place this year, and part of the reason the Pierre harangues never shut down is because this is what they come up against.
In 190 plate appearances, Pierre's TB + BB + HBP + SB - CS are 72. That is an objective negative. You can touch it up with sacrifices or running from first to third if you want or his general good-guyness, but I'm pretty convinced there are other good guys that can do better. His EQA is .240. It's just not good. An article like this only serves to rejuvenate the anti-Pierre campaign.
I've never felt that Pierre would make or break the Dodgers this year, but to credit him for being in first place, or for him to say people are picking on him unfairly - I just can't get on board. The criticisms may be all too frequent, but they're not off target.
That being said, I hope your "car trouble" isn't serious or analogous to Dylan's "motorcycle accident" after releasing "Blonde on Blonde".
1. AL - because ToyCannon 9 is right.
2. Kemp - LuGo's slump is lengthening with his slugging down to .402. Ethier's is .433. Kemp made the club in the spring and was playing and producing when he was hurt. Unless his shoulder isn't consistently healthy yet [knock wood], they can't keep him down much longer, can they?
3. Betemit - Angels' pitching very right-handed and Wilson has to start one or two of these games, right?
But he has also pretty much done what he has always done, so to say that Ned and the Dodgers didn't get what they paid for would be wrong. His numbers are not off what his career numbers project.
Now, do most people think that athletes are overpaid regardless of performance, sure a lot do. Does the fact that the guy works hard and doesn't seem to get into any off the field incidents matter, some but not enough to counter the original criticism.
I thought Ned made an interesting point when he said that the Giants bid up both Matthews and Pierre, in otherwords, inflated the CF market and so even he thought the price was high.
31
Fair enough about starting the war drums 'a beating for the head of JP, no need for that. He's here to stay for the rest of the season for sure.
As to the article being discussed last night, I did not wade through the threads before posting ...apologizes if this was not "fresh grist for the grinder".
One comparison which would be interesting on a what impact to the club would be today without JP here, how is Kenny Lofton doing over at Texas?
Hmmm... .238 with 3 HR's, 9 RBI, 19 Runs and 12 SB.
Yea, I thought that was interesting also. No question being blindsided by Drew and Kemp and Ethier ending 2006 in tail spins made him panic somewhat. The other interesting thing will be to see how it plays out from here.
Lofton has better stats than Pierre thanks to his walks, power and stolen-base success rate. Plus, if you factor in that others like Kemp would be playing in the time he sits on the bench, I would say that the Dodgers' CF situation would be stronger (and cheaper) with Lofton.
Lofton .306 OBP, .354 SLG 12/13 SB
Pierre .304 OBP, .313 SLG 15/20 SB
I think the hole at 3B for the better part of the season as had more effect on the offense than Juan Pierre's habit to ground the ball to second once or twice a game.
2007: .278/.304/.313/.617
Career:.302/.349/.375/.723
That is 24 points of average, 44 points of OBP, 62 points of SLG and 107 points of OPS. Overall, his OPS is about 15% lower than his career averages. Now, I didn't expect him to hit those averages anyway, but this is on the low end of my expectations.
Everyone I know who applauded the Pierre move has been aghast at his defense so I'm not sure if they are getting what they thought they were getting. Plus his OBA is about 50 points below his career and that is a huge difference for where he's batting. Just saying I don't think he's "pretty much done what he has always done".
In 130 plate appearances, Lofton's TB + BB + HBP + SB - CS is 69.
Pierre: 5 years $44 million
Lofton: 1 year $6 million
Who would be easier to move to 8th so, say, Martin could hit #2 ? Who would be easier to bench for, say, Kemp?
Dang-it.
I would help out but I do have to, yknow, go graduate from my college in a couple of hours....hopefully by the end of the weekend i will be re-caught up on DT also!
Sure, not spending money is good, maybe could of should have kept from raising the parking fee by not picking up Pierre...?
Or use the money saved to hire someone to come up with a traffic flow pattern in and out of Chavez ravine that actually works.
Nahhhhh
Not to mention Cruz Jr. and Ross, which I did the other day. Ross doesn't have much of a track record yet, so who knows what will happen to him. But Cruz has established his superiority to Pierre, at least in my book.
Congratulations. I don't think I would have graduated if DT existed 25 years ago.
The players with the best cases for moving up are, in order:
1. Kemp
2. Bigbie
3. Brazoban
4. Loney
5. Abreu
6. Meloan
Kemp will likely find his way back when we return to 11 pitchers. Bigbie will probably be released/traded. Brazoban will likely step if/when Seanez falters or Tomko is traded.
Loney appears to have no spot waiting for him until Saenz departs, and Abreu & Meloan (as well as the unnamed others) will have to wait for next year.
Then there are the limbo-like D. Young, Houlton, & Stults, who seemed destined to toil away in the minors until we eventually cut them loose.
Mathews's OPS+ is thirty points higher than his career average, and most of ten better than his career best, last year. His sOPS+ for CF is 122; he's been a significantly better than average offensive CF. His RC/27 is more than a run better than his career average.
Did everyone just forget how lost he was at the plate last year and how he was strictly a RH hitter.
No one was upset when Ethier eventually replaced him last year.
I think a lot of heads would have been turned had the Dodgers turned around in the off-season to sign him back as starting CF.
64 Bigbie will become a free agent at the end of the month.
JP 1st 12 games of 07 .180/.192/.200/.392
JP since 1st 12 .317/.362/.357/.719
JP Career .302/.349/.375/.723
If you give him the first 12 games with a new team to find his way he has been pretty close to his career average since.
http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2007/05/bill_plaschkes_new_book.php
Plaschke has a book coming out about Tommy Lasorda.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN199907110.shtml
Rice a Roni?
Burritos with weird things in them?
Chowder in sourdough bowls?
Roast squab in a port/fig reduction sauce served over organic field greens?
I had seen it, yet had somehow suppressed it, feeling that if I ignored it would go away just like this funny-looking mole on my arm.
Congrats, I walk tomorrow morning at 8:30. I personally want to wring the neck of the idiot who thought that all the graduating engineers would love to be awake at 8:00 in the morning on a Saturday.
There, I said something nice about his play.
His two-run, line-drive single last game was a very good PA as well.
See I can be critical of Juan, I just try to be funny too.
Just no one worries, I really don't have a funny-looking mole on my arm.
you forgot one more question, who does Scareduck/Rob root for during the freeway series??
"Ryan, PA: Hey Jayson, As a Dodgers fan I would prefer to have Loney, Kemp and Ethier in the OF rather then Pierre and Gonzo. I think they could have saved alot of money and just played the talent they already had. I think the kids would be better both offensively and defensively.
Jayson Stark: (1:31 PM ET ) The Dodgers' philsophy in signing Pierre and Gonzo was, they didn't want to force their young guys into spots where they HAD to produce in a pennant race. The reason Gonzalez only got a one-year deal was that he was supposed to serve as a bridge to the next generation. Pierre's contract is another story. There's a lot to like about Juan Pierre. But I think most people in baseball feel they gave him too many years. At the time, though, they essentially had NO outfield, and he was the best option on the market. So he's there. It will be interesting to see how his role plays out over the life of this deal, don't you think? "
No just D4P. I think he is the only one beating the drum for Jose Cruz.
Books we will not be discussing:
Anything by Kevin Kennedy, Steve Lyons or anyone else affiliated with Fox Sports.
congratulations das411
Basically the Dodgers and the D-Backs took opposite directions/philosophies. So far edge LA, check back in Sept.
Dim sum?
Some Italian dish that evokes North Beach?
I'd like to see someone present a case for Pierre being better than Cruz, using whichever criteria they wish to use.
Dewan's book also said Pierre was above average. I used that to try to half heartedly try to support the JP signing. He has looked better but only relative to how bad he looked in the beginning. I have zero faith right now in Dewan and Zone rating. My eyes are old but I've seen enough baseball and JP is not an above average CF.
http://www.laobserved.com/sports/2007/05/bill_plaschkes_new_book.php
It's kind of a fun place to hang out. I figure if I'm going to waste time on The Internets, might as well waste it on something germane. I believe that the author of the blog is a staunch libertarian, and so a big part of his opposition to planning is ideological.
That was really cool.
Are you pregnanat?
I'll put up 5 of my own dollars to any Major Leaguer willing to adopt that tune. Maybe others want to pitch in.
It would be easy. Jose only hits LHP right now and can't play CF very well. He would make a great platoon partner for JP but as an everyday CF like JP is, he doesn't cut the mustard. He has gotten off to a nice start in SD but before long you will see that he and Sledge will be in a strict platoon and that will keep his % numbers high due to the fact he will only be facing LHP. Jose Cruz has plenty of attributes but being a full time outfielder is no longer one of them. He doesn't stay healthy enough and he doesn't hit RHP at a decent enough clip.
More telling and not backed up by any statistical evidence is the fact he was released by the Dodgers even though he was doing his part in clubbing LHP and while many teams needed a spare part not one team picked him up after we released him. Depo gave him another chance but no one else was willing to. I found that odd.
Then here's what you need:
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/665327.html
2007
Pierre
vs. RH
.316/.341/.353/.694
vs. LH
.163/.196/.186/.382
Cruz
vs. RH
.277/.342/.477/.819
vs. LH
.333/.415/.611/1.026
2004-6
Pierre
vs. RH
.298/.342/.396/.738
vs. LH
.298/.347/.352/.699
Cruz
vs. RH
.226/.330/.415/.745
vs. LH
.291/.392/.493/.885
Your point is that Cruz has a bigger platoon split than Pierre. That's true. My point is that Cruz roughly as mediocre as Pierre vs. RH, but much much better versus LH.
CWS vs CHC - advantage Chisox, probably 2-1
FLA vs TB - Marlins 2-1
ATL vs BOS - I'm gonna go with the BoSox 2-1
BAL vs WAS - Orioles 2-1
CIN vs CLE - Injuns 2-1
STL vs DET - Tigers 3-0
TOR vs PHI - Phillies 2-1
NYY vs NYM - Mets 3-0. Stay away from Bronx Banter
Min vs Mil - Brewers 2-1
Tex vs Hou - Well someone has to win, so Astros 2-1
KC vs COL - Meche going Saturday, Royals 2-1
LAD vs ANA - Dodgers 2-1
SD vs SEA - Padres 2-1
SF vs OAK - A's 2-1
I'm going with an overall draw.
That would have been preferable to 5 years of Juan but not realistic since Ned had already released Juan last summer.
I like to work with scenarios that are probable based on the GM's history and while his history is short, no GM has ever released a player during the summer and then signed him over the winter to be a key component of his team.
Home: .257/.350/.400 and all 3 HR
Away: .217/.250/.300
I say the Dodgers would be getting something like .240/.300/.350 out of him with questionable defense.
1) the Times has unfairly reported on the Dodgers in the past.
2) refusal to address issues regarding handicapped people (presumably with the right placards/license plates) being shunted away from the correct parking area
3) no, you can't publish our dialogue on this matter.
At some point it just becomes talking to a brick wall. I like Josh personally the time or two I've met him, but honestly this kind of stonewalling is just too typical of the McCourt-era Dodgers.
I like Ethier's song but I don't know what it is.
The Curtis Mayfield/Kanye West medley that Martin used last year (and occasionally this year) is good too.
I'm not clear about whether it was originally on the record or not, though.
The problem is his career average really isnt good either. I dont really think you can throw out the first 12 games, or 20 games, or whatever place you want to start counting stats. They all count. Pierre has hit with the same approach in the first week of April, as he's doing right now. The short term results will vary since his production is based almost soley on BABIP.
Some weeks his bunts and dribblers will find holes, other weeks they wont. But we know he wont hit for power nor walk, so essentially Pierre is a volatile stock.
Or Junk bond (without the high yield of course).
In any event, if either Martin (Choi forbid) or Lieberthal gets hurt, Colletti has to get another catcher. So, the value of having Martinez catch the last couple innings of one horrible game over anybody else's doing it seems pretty small.
I still wish we could petition the league to have someone play the role of pinch-thrower, or literally have a 4th OFer out there. Despite Pierre's slight improvement, between he and Gonzo I still worry greatly.
So true.
You know when we signed him I wasn't happy because of the length of the deal not because I didn't think he'd be okay for us for 2007. I thought I'd enjoy watching him play because I do love to watch speed in action even though I was warned by my Cub fan friends that I was due for a frustrating season. I figured they were frustrated just because they were Cub fans but after watching him for 40 games, there is nothing about his game I enjoy. I thought I'd be watching a Micky Rivers clone playing CF but for some reason I can't get behind him. On the plus side at this exact same time last year I thought Furcal was a total loss based on his defense and offense and now he's my favorite player so I still hold out hope that JP is just having a tough time though I don't really believe it.
Gonzalez has the same problem as Drew ... Not driving in runs. But ...
Looking at the overall picture this year..
Pierre > Drew
Gonzalez > Lofton
Intimidation and/or trying to order people around is not usually the MO of a PR spokesperson. It's generally only a last resort after gentler measures have tried and failed.
Legally, I'm fairly certain Rob is under no obligation whatsoever to withhold the dialogue. Ethically, he's under no obligation to withhold it either, unless Josh asked him beforehand to keep it private.
http://www.pasadenastarnews.com/preps/ci_5924339
Wow, I greatly disagree with you.
you cant use RBI and RS stats to measure two players in two totally different scenarios.
You can if you're trying to stir up the pot.
First, completely wrong method of comparison.
Pierre: 176 AB
Drew: 120 AB
Don't bother Nate, as D4P said he's just here to cause problems. Don't waste any bandwith on him.
I do miss Kent's heavy metal. The other night when we lost to the Cardinals, the songs were all off. Sounded like they were trying some new stuff out. I definitely blame the DJ for the loss. It threw off the hitters.
If this conversation is for real and continues the believe the pot is about to over flow.
For example.... a solo home run is less valuable than the run scoring single... The home run leaves the bases empty ... the run scoring single results in a man on 1st base.
On the other hand, he's a tailor-made subsitute. Putting the ball in play? Speed on the bases? Sure -- at 120 AB a year.
Say, isn't a Drew vs. Pierre comparison an apple vs. oranges discussion anyway? They're so dissimilar as to what they bring (or don't bring) to the table. Oh, God, why am I being sucked into this conversation! I'm going to lunch...
Having a runner on first with less than two outs is already an enormous disruption on the defense. Although Pierre's speed can cause the illusion of affecting the pitcher, in the end a player who gets on base more will have a much larger effect on the defense.
But then, you knew that.
Take two of these and call me in the morning.
http://digamma.net/btfwiki/Mark_Garber
Projected Pick: Josh Smoker."
(Jonathan Broxton should have been named Josh Smoker.)
The Dodgers have already chosen Kemp over Ethier once this year out of ST, I don't see any reason they won't again if the numbers dictate.
The way I remember it is that Ethier was starting ahead of Kemp out of ST but Ethier wasn't hitting after the season started. Kemp was getting more and more playing time and it looked like Kemp was slowly taking over until he got hurt giving Ethier time to get on track.
For some reason they are listing Moustakas as a 3b/C even though Matt Dominguez was the 3b all year at Chatsworth. Moustakas played SS and Pitched but maybe he caught once in a while or is projected to catch. Seems curious.
Thanks, I had no idea what you all were talking about.
I debated whether or not to read that article because they never have anything interesting say. I see that others feel the same way.
https://screenjam.baseballtoaster.com/archives/663962.html#comments
All news reported at Screen Jam must be attributed to Bob, no matter who actually posts it.
Say, isn't a Drew vs. Pierre comparison an apple vs. oranges discussion anyway? They're so dissimilar as to what they bring (or don't bring) to the table.
Yeah, Pierre doesn't get hurt.:)
Now that's a very inside joke.
Or he's just wrong.
16. Josh Smoker, lhp, Calhoun (Ga.) HS (22)
Like Vitters, Smoker has been under the weather and suffering from bronchitis. It didn't matter in his last outing, as he went the distance and struck out a career-high 20, allowing one hit against Dade County High (Trenton, Ga.).
I don't especially care about access, as others have suggested; it's meaningless to me, because I don't get press passes and the like in general. (I've only done so once, at a minor league game two years ago, Jered Weaver's inaugural professional start.) But I do consider it a point of honor to keep private at least the literal text of those things that should be or should have had the expectation of being private, even in the case of my e-mail exchanges of Rawitch, a person whose job it is to maintain relations with the press. But because of that status, it doesn't bother me too much to mention facts already in public evidence.
I live in an apartment.
I think i still like McGeary better then Smoker at this point. While both are comparable, Smoker throws a tick harder but I like Mcgeary's delivery and secondary pitches better.
Eric, you need to see Gross Pointe Blank. It doesn't have much of an office feel to it, but that is what I thought of right away.
I'll put it this way, this is the same kind of stuff I heard prior to Kevin Love committing.
Oh yes! All my dreams are coming jrue.
And then in 2009, just by graduation, at least 3 more players depending on who is still left and there is also the possibility of others leaving early too.
(That last part just to keep Pellam appeased.)
That's too bad. He probably had the second best season of any player in the entire conference last year.
Jrue Holiday.
I can't see Aaron Brooks going very high either.
I have heard that Brooks and Nick Young have been impressive in workouts, especially Young. Young probably moved himself into the lottery.
I'm pretty sure Aaron Brooks will be in the NBA next year :)
From Josh R.'s ITD:
Furcal, SS
Pierre, CF
Garciaparra, 1B
Kent, 2B
Saenz, DH
Gonzalez, LF
Martin, C
Ethier, RF
LaRoche, 3B
Brad Penny is on the mound.
Maybe Andy will get some pitches to hit with Furcal batting behind him.
http://tinyurl.com/22xo4s
Dodgers' Jekyll: Power stuff on the mound. Their 315 strikeouts are the most in baseball, and six of their pitchers starter Randy Wolf, relievers Chad Billingsley, Jonathan Broxton, Rudy Seanez, Chin-hui Tsao and closer Takashi Saito average more than 7.5 Ks per nine innings. Just on the cusp: Mark Hendrickson, who, with a 2.61 ERA, has been quietly excellent.
Dodgers' Hyde: They hit like Little Leaguers. Of the Dodgers' 372 hits, 272 are singles. Only the Cardinals, Nationals and White Sox do we see a recurring theme here? have less extra-base hits than the Dodgers.
Don't get me wrong, a few years of Jeff Shaw "closing" the door by getting guys to hit the ball at someone makes me very happy to see the current crop strike guys out.
But I just think that total is not giving an accurate impression of our staff.
The MSM is so manipulated by the access issue. Everyone is afraid to ask the tough questions or be critical for fear of losing access. I spent the last three days involved in a situation that was covered by a number of media outlets. Both the LAT and Daily Journal got the facts wrong. Worse yet, they report things they know are confidential and should not be published. They allow themselves to be manipulated through "leaks" and will even report inaccurate information to preserve their access.
I believe we went through this last year but the only team from the original 8 AL teams (and their siblings) that the Dodgers have not played in the World Series is the Detroit Tigers. And they have not played any of the "expansion" franchises.
If and when Schmidt, Kuo, and Chad move into the rotation, our starters will be much more of a strikeout variety.
Are they back at the DRays regular home stadium?
Even though the Giants have won 20 NL pennants (if you go back to the 19th century), they've missed the Tigers and Orioles of the "Original Eight" in the AL.
The Cardinals have 21 pennants (not all in the NL) and have missed the Indians and White Sox.
I must give the Dodgers FO credit for not trading Penny after he faltered last season. Sometimes the best trades are the ones you don't make. That's what seperates the good teams (Sabean & Co.) from the great teams (Colletti & Co.)
The Yankees have also played 4 of the 8 teams to have joined the NL through additions from expansion.
270 Thank you, Artie. (Rip Torn)
Kinda rolls off the tongue.
One of my Yankee fan friends was very upset about the Astros going to the World Series because that meant that there was an NL pennant winner that had played in a World Series and NOT played the Yankees.
He gets upset about very odd things.
I want a scouting report on him!
The best part about it is that it's almost always the same comment.
Meanwhile, while I will worry quietly about the game tonight but will be at the movies and out so I'll miss most of it. Buena suerte.
One way to correct this problem would be to have everyone's IP address show up beside their screenname.
I think its the same guy thats caused some problems at the BBWC site in a thread about the Tampa Bay trades. Canuck put that guy in his place and he (Bluetahoe aka tskent aka...) was pretty much ignored off the site, but then he comes back here apparently bc he didnt get enough attention there.
Here are Billingsley's walk and K rates in terms of batters faced in 2006 and 2007:
Year -- SO% -- BB% -- ERA -- Batters Faced
2006 -- 14.6 -- 14.4 -- 3.80 -- 403
2007 -- 27.7 -- 11.7 -- 3.80 -- 94
Wow, same ERA, but night and day with the strikeout and walk rates. Of course this year is a smaller sample, and in relief which is probably an easier environment to strike out lots of hitters. Yet I'm willing to go out on a limb and say he's improved a significant amount from last year.
I think his next step to becoming an elite pitcher is cutting down more on the walks. That, and getting back into the rotation.
The difference is that the Outwatch is so obnoxious by its very nature -- I mean, I'm counting outs -- that I feel I have to welcome everybody, no matter how little they contribute to the conversation, and no matter what unspeakable acts they imply I like to do with my mother.
71and91: #^@#^ %^#@$%^ @!!^ and ^#@#%^
Humma Kavula: Thanks for the comment! All the best.
From what I saw he has a pretty live fastball, probably 92 or so, and a pretty sharp slurve (bites like a slider but has more of a diagonal movement than a normal slider). He has somewhat of an unorthodox arm action, it reminded me a little bit of Ramon Martinez in how stiff it looked. He pitched really well when I saw him, only allowing a few hits and no runs, even keeping Justin Upton hitless.
Sorry I can't give anything more detailed.
He does however need to be added to 40 man roster at the end of this season since this is 5th year of pro ball and 6th draft since he was drafted.
thats good enough, thanks overkill.
It just blows my mind that someone has both the time and the inclination to troll message boards
My theory is that it's Plaschke. It takes him half the time to write a column than everyone else due to all the whitespace, so he's still got time to troll.
Will be nice if they can win tonight because I don't like that Hendrickson-Weaver matchup tomorrow.
On the other hand, it's very clear what the commenter is trying to say. He may not have tact, but he does write clearly. There is only one thing that can be implied by a four-letter word.
Plus, in order for it to be Plaschke, he would have to use a comp-yoo-turr.
I see what you mean. I've been ignoring the comments section on ItD because this blog is so much better. I just took a look and saw this post:
Posted by: jjweisman@dodgerthoughts.com | May 18, 2007 04:31 PM
It's literally all that is discussed there, and considering im here saying that- that's saying something. About what I have no idea.
I just think it would make me a hypocrite to post obnoxious ideas under a false name -- it's true, my name is not really Humma Kavula -- and then ban others from posting whatever they like.
Besides, it's not like there is an ongoing, vibrant discussion that he's ruining. It's usually just me, jimbilly4 (who I happen to know in real life), and ArtHTracy chiming in with the out leaders...
In order to keep my tiny point alive, I think it's best to keep this going as it is and see what happens. He got bored once and it's likely to happen again.
Speaking of the Sox, because of the rain out, NESN is airing a rerun of the Dodgers-Sox game from June 11, 2004. Odalis Perez and Derek Lowe are both throwing pretty good games. 0-0 in the sixth.
http://tinyurl.com/3cnqry
I particularly like the idea of disemvoweling, although it's probably more trouble than it's worth.
323 I've got a hundred Stanley nickels that he hits a double but not a homer. But will be happy with either.
Stats 101: Reyes of sunshine
>>> Stat/Run Value
Stolen Base 0.185
Caught Stealing -0.45
Single 0.46
Double 0.75
Triple 1.03
Home Run 1.40
Unintentional Walk 0.30 <<<
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/6818648
Home Run 1.40
that doesnt make sense to me...
I don't think the Orioles were an original AL team. Weren't they the St. Louis Browns?
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.