Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Former Dodger player and coach Tim Wallach was named manager of the franchise's relocated AAA squad in Albuquerque, reports Diamond Leung of the Press-Enterprise.
* * *
Keith Thursby of The Daily Mirror passes along a full-page spread from 50 years ago Sunday highlighting Duke Snider's guest shot (pun intended) on The Rifleman.
* * *
Update: Lovable Franklin Stubbs has been named hitting coach for Class A Inland Empire, the Dodgers announced today.
I'm embarrased to say it but that Mall Cop trailer cracks me up every time. I accept your scorn. :)
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/R43M
Our old fence needs to be replaced now.
It was probably just localized 24 karma.
--
Scout.com's Tot Holmes has 1B Steven Caseres as #28 in his Dodger prospect countdown. He's one I've found intriguing...
Must have been all the shame of Janeane Garofalo exploding.
Heh.
Did they explain how Tony Almeida is alive?
Nope.
Yeah. I kept staring at him, thinking it was him, but I looked it up on IMDB to confirm.
Anyway, back to baseball. Have we signed Manny yet?
Thank You for the Duke Snider reference. I really appreciate it! My favorite player along with Feynman and Einstein.
Maybe you could add the Snider Web site to the right side of the page?
http://snideralbum.tripod.com/index.html
Thanks again.
"In 2003 and 2004, Stubbs was a roving instructor for Atlanta, before becoming a coach at Single-A Myrtle Beach from 2005-06. The past two seasons, the former Dodger first baseman has been the hitting coach for the Braves' Double-A affiliate, the Mississippi Braves. The 2009 season will mark Stubbs' 22nd season in professional baseball."
http://www.trolleydodger.com/2008/12/12/whats-my-line-duke-and-campy/
I initially thought he was overdue for the Hall of Fame. Now I'm not so sure. He never hit those magic markers of 500 HRs or 3000 hits. His career high for OPS+ in a season was 157, which is very good.
I guess what bothered me was that he had some years when he was great, and then a few other years where he was probably average. With that said, he had an OPS+ of over 100 in every year he played but two. That's very very good.
I'm undecided. I was too young to see Jim Rice play, but I suppose worse candidates have been inducted.
It's the same reason why Harold Stassen never became president.
Nomar thinking about coming back, says Dodgers still a possibility.
Nomar could go to Philadelphia and be healed by the same magical water that Jayson Werth bathed in.
And then we could discuss every single day from now until the year 2039 about how the Dodgers should have kept Jayson Werth.
That's not a Rule 6 violation. I'm expecting the world to end in 2039.
You'd have to ask the voters who voted in Maz even though Grich was better offensively in every way and an excellent defensive 2nd baseman in his own right.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem
Or we could discuss the hatred for ND, that rarely gets brought up.
2039 is when the world's supply of Soylent Green will run out.
I've written a book on this topic.
http://losangeles.dodgers.mlb.com/la/fan_forum/anniversary_patch.jsp
Next year both the Yankees and Mets will wear patches saluting their first year in their new ballparks.
http://yankees.lhblogs.com/2009/01/12/yankees-break-out-a-new-patch/
The Mets lose again.
The Burrell signing didn't appear to set off a firestorm of corner outfield signings so I think it will be a while before this all get resolved.
Wow, the Mets patch is beyond pathetic.
Must have been hard to type that with all your fingers crossed.
It looks like some sort of boring font and that it was created using Microsoft Word for 2 minutes.
That would be like saying we don't need an outfielder because we have Juan Pierre on the roster.
I understand the frustration but there isn't any incentive for Manny to sign with anyone unless he and Boras feels that their are no better offers out there. And right now, they apparently feel that there is a market for Manny.
What good would it do the Dodgers to place a deadline that they can't really force them to make?
There are no threats the Dodgers can make to force Manny to come to the table and there isn't any other market forces to cause the Dodgers to bid against themselves.
A starting lineup can certainly be clear. Right now, we have a black hole in LF. I'd like to know if we're going to get some offense at that position. And I want to know before this month is over, at the very latest.
And I don't think even if they sign Manny, the second base question and the 4th and 5th starters will be cleared up until March.
http://www.mattwelch.com/archives/2006/12/24-week/#2834
At least he tore up the minor leagues something the above have yet to accomplish.
What does this have to do with baseball and the Dodgers? Schmidt and Jones are in the millions range, and it would be hard to convince me they didn't know before they signed on the dotted line. (or were incompetent to sign a document like this)
Cabinets are not as hard as some people think. It's doable with one person, but two definitely helps. Install the upper cabinets first, and just attach a board (1x4 works good) to the wall, perfectly level, at the height you want the bottom of the cabinets to be. Then set the cabinets on the board, starting in the corner, and screw them in. Make sure you are screwing them into the studs. The bottom cabinets can be a bit more difficult, but nothing having plenty of shims on hand can't fix. Just make sure you end up with them perfectly level before you try to install the counter top. Also, after you have the old cabinets out, you want to make sure the wall you are installing on is perfectly flat and exactly perpendicular to the floor. The counter top itself can be very tricky, especially if it is a large kitchen and you will have seems. If you are thinking of granite, stone, etc. I would definitely have this part done by a professional.
Will the heathen gods have more Soylent Green than what we have now?
I've been trying to corner the market on Soylent Green at the Chicago Board of Trade.
(these questions just popped into my head because I was checking Stubbs' career numbers after reading 62 )
The Dodgers have a few players like Stubbs in the minor leagues. Big LF 1st/OF types with long swings and lousy plate discipline. The man had 10 seasons in the major leagues only three teams posted an OBP > 300. And he's our hitting instructor. Awesome, I hope he came at a discount
It's hard to predict what kind of coach Stubbs will be based on his playing record. Perhaps Stubbs has ideas about hitting that he couldn't execute himself.
Charlie Lau was a well-regarded hitting coach in his day, and his career OPS+ was 89. Stubbs' was 96.
Walt Alston struck out in his only plate appearance, and he made an error in the field. Sparky Anderson put up a 43 OPS+ in only one full season in his career. Tony Larussa's career OPS+ is 53. All 3 turned out to be HOF managers.
Obviously manager is a different position than hitting coach, but the point is that what matters is the individual's ability to teach. Sort of a do as I say, not necessarily as I did mentality.
A cool video game would be a world where all of the geographic mythical Gods came to life so Zues could battle Shiva for World Domination.
And if we don't get Manny, I will accept Dunn rather well.(although I appreciate defense, and have seen that Manny can be not that bad.
Don't get bummed when Marvel releases Thor in two years.
I can't imagine that movie cost much to make so it should be fine once it comes out on video.
We're not concerned with strikeouts and home runs. It's not because we want to punish weak hitters. We're not comparing power hitters and weak hitters. We're just comparing whether ONE particular hitter has been lucky or not.
Line drive percentage helps measure how when a player gets "good wood", ie, drives the ball, hits it square, etc. If a player drives the ball, he's more likely to get a base hit of some kind. Simple enough, right?
Also, note that line drive percentage only keeps track of times when the ball is actually put in play (ie, ground balls, fly balls, live drives). We're ALREADY only looking at balls in play. That's why we're concerned with BABIP and not BA.
Now, you'd think that a player who hits lots of line drives would have a high batting average out of those balls he hits. It makes sense right? Flyballs and groundballs are easier outs. Less of those and more line drives mean ought to mean more hits. This is true in the long run but not always in the short run.
If someone has a high BABIP and a low LD%, they're probably getting lucky. ie, flyballs are dropping in front of outfielders, ground balls are finding holes, etc. If someone has a low BABIP and a high LD%, they're probably unlucky. Line drives are getting gobbled up by good fielders. So, over time, you'd would think that these things tend to balance out (for most players). They do, and in the long run (hundreds and hundreds, maybe thousands of at-bats), BABIP tends correlate with LD%.
So, it's only comparing what happens when a ball is hit in play. We're not comparing players who strike out 50% of the time with those who strike out 1% of the time. If a player who strikes out 50% of the time has a good line drive percentage, his batting average on balls in play ought to also be high. But that alone doesn't mean his batting average will also be high, because he strikes out a lot.
This is useful to see if a player is hitting "over his head." If a player is hitting .400 and has a really high BABIP but a fairly low LD%, we can be pretty sure that he's not gonna be able to keep hitting .400.
For example, when regfairfield says that James Loney hit a legit .380 in AAA, he's referring to James Loney's LD%/BABIP numbers. Loney had a GREAT LD%. So even though his BABIP was pretty high, he backed it up because he was hitting line drives. He wasn't hitting pop-ups to no man's land. He was smacking the ball.
Does that make more sense?
Great posts like that are why you got quoted on the sidebar. :)
Very informative.
They haven't hit a clunker with their own studio but they had two clunkers with Punisher and Elektra made by outside studio's. The Elektra bomb was one of the reasons why they decided to stop licensing rights to characters and create their own studio.
They got lucky when New Line didn't know what to do with Iron Man and the rights reverted back to them but they deserve the credit for getting it right.
Tis a shame about Spiderman. They make lots of dough on the toys side but very little on the box office side even with the billions it has brought in because of the deal they signed with Sony. They had to do it to make themselves solvent but it is a tough pill to swallow for them to see Sony making all the money.
With Iron Man they finally see all the profit themselves.
With the purchase of the MB studio they have made a huge commitment to film everything in Los Angeles, this should help them continue to draw in the top talent.
Does anyone in Hollywood not want to work for them right now?
LD%:
Line Drive Percentage. Baseball Info Solutions tracks the trajectory of each batted ball and categorizes it as a groundball, fly ball or line drive. LD% is the percent of batted balls that are line drives. Line drives are not necessarily the hardest hit balls, but they do fall for a hit around 75% of the time.
Based on that, it seems like there must be some standardized way to calculate it, I would imagine having something to do with distance traveled and time in the air.
http://www.clipsnation.com/2009/1/12/718347/is-chris-kaman-s-foot-caus
Isn't it still a person who makes the subjective decision? Just like an umpire following guidlines for ball and strikes you will have different interpretations or am I completely off base?
He is now. But his career was not thriving and he was not a box office draw.
Qualls had a better year than Valverde. Maybe the D-Backs should have just had him close instead of Lyon.
in re Marvel Studios: Captain America should be very easy to adapt to modern times, though they'd be better off doing the first act as the WWII stuff with him riding the rocket and then the second and third act being his return.
Michael Young wants out of Texas, and the Rangers would have to eat part of the salary.
Would Young for Dewitt and Pierre work? And move Furcal to 2B?
Just a thought.
I'd rather trade for Wolverine. :-)
Fly balls would have small y's but large x's.
Ground balls would have small x's relative to their y's. Line drives somewhere in-between.
(I made that up, ie, didn't read it anywhere).
Michael Young is due $80 million over the next 5 years, his age 32-36 seasons. No thanks.
Also, Michael Young is a horrible defensive SS, despite his Rafael Palmeiro / Derek Jeter-esque Gold Glove.
+/-
2006: -10 (28th among MLB SS)
2007: -15 (32nd)
2008: -7 (27th)
Does he wear a less ridiculous outfit?
No idea. That is easily the worst GG choice ever, and perhaps one of the very worst award choices in MLB history.
Here's a pic.
http://tinyurl.com/7yodyq
In fact theres a pretty ridiculous alternate intro to the Hulk movie thats on the DVD where if you squint hard enough you can see Captain Americas shield underneath the ice after the Hulk induces an avalanche.
via espn insider
Yeah, I've been researching a bit on his contract. You are right, he is due about $62m over the next 5 years. There's some confusion as to how much of the remaining $18m was paid as a signing bonus, and how much is deferred as salary.
If we assume Young is due "only" $62m over the next 5 years ($12.4m/year), I still wouldn't touch him with a 10-foot pole. We don't have an open spot in the infield, except perhaps at 2B.
From Fangraphs, the projections for Young for 2009 range from an OPS of .756 to .776, and that's in Arlington (roughly a 100-103 OPS+). Blake DeWitt's projection range is wider, from .690 to .761 (roughly a 95-105 OPS+). That's not much of an upgrade, especially considering Young is entering ages 32-36 and likely to decline, while DeWitt will be 23-27 and likely to improve. I don't want to spend $12.4m/year on an "upgrade" that really isn't an upgrade.
Oh yeah, and that's assuming Young will move to 2B. He's already bitching about Texas wanting him to move to 3B, so why would he want to move positions somewhere else?
If we move Furcal to 2B to accommodate Young, we are moving a very good defensive SS (Furcal) to make room for a very bad one (Young; see 105 ).
There is roughly zero chance Young will become a Dodger, at least this offseason. And even if there was a chance, it would be an awful waste of money.
Again, we are talking about a middle infielder, not a corner infielder or corner outfielder.
I am not even saying do the deal. It was just a thought. But I do think Young (at his position) would be a big upgrade over Pierre.
Adding a little more, from Fangraphs:
2008 Dollar Value
Michael Young: $7.5m
Blake DeWitt: $8.8m
I little bit of explanation of how that is calculated here:
http://tinyurl.com/axwa4g
Part of the reason might also be the confusion since Grich was referred to as "Bob" and "Bobby" on different baseball cards.
However, this confusion didn't hurt Roberto "Bob" Clemente. :)
I am not as high on DeWitt and ohers might be. The Fangraphs appears to be saying similar production, and I have to believe there's at least a chance those projections could be wrong. Have their projections ever been wrong?
So, similar (if not better) production at 2B, and Pierre is gone, making room for D. Young in the OF. I just don't see that as being a terrible, terrible thing.
Shouldn't you be at another party?
http://baseballanalysts.com/archives/2008/12/if_gordon_then.php
http://www.myfoxatlanta.com/myfox/pages/Sports/Detail?contentId=8237824&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=VSTY&pageId=6.1.1
The $28.5 million owed Pierre must be thought of as a sunk cost. That money is long gone.
If we deal for Young, we gain a player who is only marginally better (if at all) than the player in the infield he's replacing (DeWitt). Is it worth paying an average of $6.7m / year ($33.5/5) extra just to have Pierre gone? That seems like taking an awfully large risk for something that may or may not be an upgrade.
http://tinyurl.com/8xs38p
Bobby Grich played on the Orioles when they were the class of the AL East and then was one of the first big time free agents when Gene Autry brought him to the Angels. Until Grich came to the Angels, post-season was just something they watched on TV. The Angels with Grich won the AL West in 1979 1982 and 1986.
Bobby Grich was probably one of the 3-4 best 2B in his time, only Morgan and Sandberg were better and they bracketed his career.
Yeah, but for planning purposes it's best to think of that money as already spent. Then, if they can trade him, it's like found money! :)
And thought it may hard to believe, Michael Young for 5 years at an avg. $12.4M per year is much worse than JP at $9.33M for the next 3 years.
But he didn't call bank!
I have two cool shot stories, sadly neither of which were preserved on film:
1) In 4th grade, my friend Trevor threw up a half-court shot at the end of recess that hit the rim, bounced over the backboard, hit the metal support behind the backboard, bounced back over the backboard and through the net. We were unaware at the time this was actually an illegal shot.
2) Just before my uncle moved out of his house in Redlands, we went on a family trip to Tahoe. Just as we were getting in the car, I chucked a small basketball roughly 60 feet into the net of his backyard basketball hoop. That was the last time I ever saw that house. I didn't think to pause with my hand in the air after the shot (then again this was probably 9 or so years earlier than Jordan on Byron Russell anyway).
http://hotstove.mlblogs.com/archives/2009/01/dodgers_mota_close_to_deal.html
Mota would be in line for... something. I guess its a guaranteed deal.
Bobby Grich may have to become the next Joe Gordon.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/2009/01/dodgers-winter-league-updates-1.html
There must be some fear that with an all-kid bullpen the rapscallions will spend too much time horsing around in full view of ToyCannon's seats. We simply must have a veteran to keep the peace out there; otherwise the trainers will have to spend too much time treating noogies and purple nurples.
Mota
2008: 4.52 FIP, 4.40 x-FIP, $200k dollar value
2007: 4.35 FIP, 4.32 x-FIP, ($900k) dollar value (deficit)
And yes I used Google to confirm the speeling of "noogies."
Babe Herman, 143, in 1930.
He finished FIFTH in the NL that year in runs scored.
Even with your warning my head nearly exploded when I clicked the link from Google.
I mixed up the Fangraphs dollar values. Mota had a negative dollar value in 2008, not 2007.
I think it's been called worse.
But one of the reasons Furcal favored Los Angeles over Atlanta was because he did not want to move to 2nd base.
You know, Michael Young isn't coming to LA so I'm not sure why we're talking about that at length, but hey, if it's fun for ya carry on. But it ain't happening.
http://tinyurl.com/7z67v3
http://thesportshernia.typepad.com/blog/2009/01/other-inventive-patches-found-in-mets-brainstorming-lab.html
Hilarious.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/2009/01/dodgers-agree-t.html
I love the move, mostly because it means Juan Cruz isn't signing here.
I called his cell earlier. Said he was just hanging out at home tonight.
Dodgers finalizing SP search and "are focused on a group of free agents including Jon Garland, Randy Wolf and Braden Looper."
Kyle Farnsworth (Royals) - 2/$9.25m (+ an option)
LaTroy Hawkins (Astros) - 1/$3.5m
Doug Brocail (Astros) - 1/$2.75m (+ option)
Bob Howry (Giants) - 1/$2.75m
Chan Ho Park (Phillies) - 1/$2.25m
Chad Gaudin (Cubs) - 1/$2m
Jorge Julio (Brewers) - 1/$950k
Scott Proctor (Marlins) - 1/$750k
I'm guessing Mota signed for at least $2m for one year.
Please let them all get injured tomorrow.
All just a waste of money.
Wonder if Dodgers are in the mix for Pettit, seems to make more sense since he only wants a year rather than two or three years with Looper Wolfe or Garland.
I love the "mule" term. So apt.
And to correct: in my mind, I was actually thinking that the blog referenced "finalizing search for the mule SP role" ... but personally, I'm still holding out hope for a relatively affordable Sheets in a "non-mule" SP role.
As horrible as he is as a columnist?
You gotta be kidding me. 75 cents to buy a paper that is cutting back on all fronts!?
http://www.laobserved.com/archive/2009/01/lat_now_50_more.php
You always have to pay a premium when you buy off the streets. You're putting food on tables, yo.
Call me crazy, but I don't understand your post.
195
Try to call the LA Times and see if you can get a deal on delivery. I got solicited via phone and I get Thursday through Sunday delivered -- in San Diego -- for only 25 cents per week.
Wow, that may be the cheapest thing on Earth.
I asked them to go to 24 cents per week, but I was rebuffed.
That's a good sign to stop then. :)
I'm going dark.
For the 2008 postseason awards 28 and 32 ballots (2 active members from each AL and NL team respectively) were cast.
Schmidt headlines US staff additions
http://tinyurl.com/8apab8
It would be tragically comical if Jason Schmidt was somehow healthy enough to pitch in the WBC, then somehow hurt himself during the tournament so he was lost for the Dodger season.
This is not the first time it has happened.
Sorry for the length of this list but here are just some of the players eligible for making a nice sum of cash this year.
Player/Pos./Service Time
Conor Jackson inf 3.067
Nick Markakis of 3.000
Jonathan Papelbon rhp 3.064
Kevin Youkilis 1b 4.093
Kevin Gregg rhp 5.002
Bobby Jenks rhp 3.090
Garrett Atkins inf 4.072
Huston Street rhp 4.000
Justin Verlander rhp 3.002
Joel Zumaya rhp 3.000
Jeremy Hermida of 3.033
Dan Uggla inf 3.000
Chone Figgins inf 5.145
Mike Napoli c 2.151 *
Ervin Santana rhp 3.104
Jared Weaver rhp 2.129 *
Jonathan Broxton rhp 3.020
Andre Ethier of 2.153 *
Russell Martin c 2.150 *
Prince Fielder 1b 3.068
Corey Hart of 3.038
John Maine rhp 3.013
Joe Blanton rhp 4.016
Cole Hamels lhp 2.143 *
Ryan Howard 1b 3.145
Ryan Madson rhp 5.027
Shane Victorino of 3.092
Jayson Werth of 5.102
Zach Duke lhp 3.094
Paul Maholm lhp 3.037
Nate McLouth of 3.056
Rick Ankiel of 5.033
Chris Duncan of 2.144 *
Ryan Ludwick of 3.109
Heath Bell rhp 3.099
Erik Bedard lhp 5.171
Felix Hernandez rhp 3.060
Dioner Navarro c 3.103
B.J. Upton of 2.126 *
Ryan Zimmerman 3b 3.032
I wish we would sign Ben Sheets, because he is extremely undervalued right now, but I understand that will not happen. I honestly think 80% of DT posters or more have the mindset to be better GMs than the staff we have in place right now. I remember when I was advocating we trade for BJ Upton and Dustin Pedroia before teams understood how good they were, and I think the majority of my fellow DTers felt the same way.
I will give some credit to Ned and the Dodger staff for understanding that it is time for the youngsters in my age group to take over. But I still feel like we are wasting resources, and we frankly should be the best team in the National League. It is time to take over, simple as that!!
I commend you and other "youngsters" in having the foresight to see the value in players before us older guys get it.
I just wonder if perhaps, just maybe, there are others following other teams who just might see the value in the Pedroias and Uptons of the world as you do.
It's really easy to sit on the sidelines as we all do and say, trade for this player, give up that player, etc etc. But it takes two (or sometimes more) to make a trade, and if your counterpart also sees the value in the new and upcoming Pedroias or Uptons of the world, trades may not be so easily done.
What you say sounds nice if we lived in a vacuum and could structure deals any way we see fit without interference from other teams' scouts or GMs.
I honestly think 80% of DT posters or more have the mindset to be better GMs than the staff we have in place right now.
I think 100% of DT posters have valid opinions at one time or another; and sometimes those opinions seem to me, to be better than the chosen direction of the team (with the very limited visibility I have of what the team is actually capable of doing). That being said, while I love listening to all the DT posters and learn much from their various and competing points of view, there isn't one of us that I would want to hire for GM
Therefore I humbly place myself in the less qualified 20%
Wow. You've got high standards. Unless you think most current MLB GMs are qualified, in which case your standards are low. Or maybe they're paradoxically high and low at the same time.
Setting aside the "political" aspects of the GM job, the GM job is pretty easy, especially since most owners are neanderthals who let GMs make dumb decisions based on antiquated player evaluation criteria.
As long as GMs are allowed to hire players based on "veteraness", "havingbeentherebeforeness", "heart", "grittiness", etc. etc. etc., one doesn't really have much of a leg to stand on when trying to argue that the bar for GMs has been set really high.
I don't think most GMs are successful, but I think by and large that is because the job is far more difficult than you give it credit for.
You know, you might make a similar case that outside of the "political" aspects of the job being President isnt all that hard either...
Its hard to think the best team in the NL would want to have Guillermo Mota pitching for it.
Out:
Takashi Saito
Joe Beimel
In:
Claudio Vargas
Guillermo Mota
In most cases, it seems that getting and keeping a GM job is much more about who you know than what you know.
I do think the GM job is difficult if success is defined in terms of building championship teams. There are too many variables outside a GM's control for that to be a reasonable expectation.
HOWEVEVER: there are important variables that are under a GM's control, and from what I can tell, most GMs do a bad job addressing them.
With Kershaw/Billingsley/Kuroda/???/????, the bullpen will get plenty of use this season. I can see why Manny is so important this offseason bc the pitching has taken a serious step backwards.
According to David O'Brien of the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Braves agreed to terms with Derek Lowe on a four-year, $60MM deal. For all the talk of the Braves' failed offseason, they've added three quality starting pitchers.
Earlier this morning there were the same rumors from ESPN and SI.
Braves have the 7th pick. Since we would get the 2nd rounder, the worst that could possibly be is pick #62. It depends on where the remaining Type A/B free agents sign.
http://www.ajc.com/sports/content/sports/braves/stories/2009/01/13/braves_lowe.html
Also, the sandwich pick we get will at worst be #45
Much better than if we had gotten the Mets pick, I think.
The Mets already signed K-Rod, who ranks higher than Lowe, so we would have got their 2nd rounder too, 18 picks lower than Atlanta's.
LA also gets a sandwich pick too?
The best sandwich pick we could get for Lowe is #37, behind the Mariners (Ibañez), Rockies (Fuentes), and D-Backs (Hudson, thus far unsigned).
In fact, we're pretty locked in to #37 since we get that for Manny anyway if he doesn't return.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.