Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The Dodgers would rather spend money on washed-up infielders than a potential starting pitcher.
For the amount of money that the team has paid or will pay guys like Ramon Martinez, Wilson Valdez and Shea Hillenbrand this year, the Dodgers could have had Kyle Blair, a first-round talent whom they stole with a fifth-round draft pick because of signability concerns. And even though Blair came down from a requested $1.5 million signing bonus to $1.1 million, according to Tony Jackson of the Daily News, the Dodgers are walking away.
"We were unable to come to terms," Dodgers assistant general manager Logan White told Jackson. "We wish Kyle Blair the best and know he is going to have a good career. We just weren't able to get it done. He is a good kid. I talked to Kyle today, and there is disappointment all around that we weren't able to get it done. But there certainly is a positive feeling toward Kyle, and I think he feels the same way towards us. I think everybody made as much effort as they could, but it was just a no-go."
Again, let's reiterate. It's not that the Dodgers don't have the money to spend. It's that they choose to spend it on declining or completely declined players. They choose to spend big chunks on low- or no-ceiling players like Martinez, Valdez, Hillenbrand, Mark Hendrickson ($2.925 million this season) and Brett Tomko (nearly $10 million guaranteed for 2006-2008, even if they buy out his 2008 option) - players that anyone can see are of minimal help. They would rather eat crackers for dinner than take a chance that for the same amount of money, they might end up with steak - if they could show the slightest bit of patience and discipline.
What am I missing? The eminently respected White is publicly on board with letting Blair go, but I still don't understand. This isn't a case of a player like former draft choice (and 2007 MLB top pick) David Price, who was determined to go to college. Blair was ready to make a deal. So unless Blair has suffered an arm injury, unless the Dodgers suddenly had reason to reverse their opinion of him, this makes absolutely no sense. It would be one thing if the Dodgers were being thrifty as a rule - if they didn't waste their money on the untalented. But they can't keep themselves from shopping for the shiny toys with the lead paint.
Mark Sweeney had a brain cramp Wednesday night - remarkably stupid, but something that with two seconds of extra thought he would never allow to happen. But the Dodgers, with all summer to prepare for this moment rationally, cannot see the forest for the trees. This is the blunder of the week - and potentially much more significant. I don't care if Blair never makes it out of AA ball. If he has the potential that he is professed to have, the Dodgers have made a huge mistake.
There is a real philosophical disconnect symbolized by not signing Blair. Yes, the Dodgers have Matt Kemp, Andy LaRoche, Clayton Kershaw, James Loney, Russell Martin, Jonathan Broxton. But they cannot rest on those laurels. Nobody's perfect, but it does get to a point where if your major skill is retaining talent that you should obviously retain, then that's not a lot to hang your hat on - especially when in fact you're not retaining all the talent that you should obviously retain. They either need to stay aggressive in their approach to the draft, or stop wasting money that could be better spent. And why not both?
* * *
Tonight's game:
Update: The notion that MLB discouraged the Dodgers from paying X amount of dollars for Blair is unsatisfying. If the reality is essentially that MLB is making it impossible for a drafted player to be signed, that has to be challenged. And, in fact, other teams are doing just that, going above the slotted money to sign their draftees.
Brilliant Jon.
I pledge five dollars to sign Kyle Blair.
I got about tree fitty.
Yet...so sad that it had to come to this.
The Seattle Mariners, desperate for a closer at the trading deadline [ten years ago], dealt two of their best prospects to the Boston Red Sox for reliever Heathcliff Slocumb.
The Mariners won one postseason game that year, and have yet to reach the World Series.
Those two prospects who were traded to a Red Sox team that finished 20 games out of first place?
Future World Series championship players Jason Varitek and, um, er, Derek Lowe.
"Well, yeah," Lowe said.
What do these pitchers have in common:
Bryan Morris
Scott Elbert
Justin Orenduff
Chuck Tiffany
Greg Miller
All have been drafted in the first or supplemental rounds and gotten bonuses at or near the amount Kyle Blair reportedly came down to in his negotiations with the Dodgers.
They also have had some type of surgery and though its remains possilbe that Miller, Orenduff, Elbert and Morris will pitch in Dodger Stadium, there are no guarantees it will happen.
I agree with Jon that the team should not a let a few dollars stop them from acquiring good young talent but that is about 5 million in bonus money that is currently either waiting to throw again this fall or is back in Jacksonville so just because someone is highly touted, doesn't put him in Chavez Ravine.
Dental Plan!
I'm only going to make the brownies if bhsportsguy gives me the go ahead.
Nothing more fun than baking on a 100-degree day. But it's a mix, so the prep work is next to nothing. It involves measuring, pouring, and inserting in the oven and that will be it.
So does Carolyn
No doubt it is a risk, but at the cost it seems smart. I mean it was a huge risk to sign Schmidt and Wolf and they have proven things in the league.
How did I miss that?
This downward snowballing has got to stop.
First the ship sank then the sea dried up, all that was left were tears.
Sure they all could blow out their arms which is why you have to keep restocking with talent until one of them makes it.
I'd rather have one high upside arm make it then 3 rotational fillers. I understand your point, I don't agree with it. If this was a 2nd round talent asking for 1.1 then he'd be out of line but most draft hounds said that Blair was a 1st round talent. If Brackman gets 3.3, then Blair would seem to be worth 1.1. It almost seems like a no brainer to me.
Maybe it should be the other way around.
How about -- the Dodgers are on probation. They don't get another dollar of my money until they show they deserve it.
Examples of not deserving my money:
Trading away young, power-hitting infielders
Choosing not to sign young, talented pitchers
Picking up stiff after stiff from the trash heap
The list goes on...
Thus the problem. Maybe you can see it, maybe I can see it, maybe all of DT can see it. But what if the deeply serious baseball people see different? Let's take it player-by-player.
Hendrickson: Relatively low contract, pitched well for his previous team and might pitch even better in a pitchers park like Dodger Stadium. Provides depth and he's left-handed.
That's not a bad argument to get Mark Hendrickson.
Shea Hillenbrand: A two-time All-Star who was OPSing over .800 with Toronto last season . He's not doing anything now but, of course, neither are we so why not get him and see if he can't help drum up a winning streak?
I think if the Dodgers were truly out of it, they would've passed on Hillenbrand.
Brett Tomko: Grady Little likes his arm. And if my manager says he likes his arm, I like his arm.
What do all of these players have in common? They have all (quite arguably) had success in the bigs and in the case of the two pitchers, they've enjoyed success with the Dodgers.
Oh yeah--I forgot one.
Martinez/Valdez: I haven't been able to tell the difference between these two since they joined the team.
Wilson Valdez scored the winning run in the last game the Dodgers won in San Diego.
Brady Clark drove him in.
I think the image of the guys sitting around in Panama hats smoking cigars is fading.
We're going festival tonight to raise money. We can do it!*
*We can't really do it.
All I am saying is that they had two more months to look at him and maybe their projection changed, maybe they don't even see him as a first round guy in three years, again you'd have to ask them but I think it was more than just the money.
I'm not baking any brownies until I get the go-ahead from bhsportsguy.
Or me.
Well said above Jon. I keep feeling like we must be missing some piece of information, something, other than that they cheaped out, but haven't seen it yet.
About 7 hours left. I say this is all a big bluff by the D's and we'll sign him about 11:45 tonight........yes I believe in fairies and pixie dust.
Contreras - I'm sure we can get Pierre through waivers. Let's just trade him even up with each team taking on the contract of the guy they got. The White Sox need a center fielder for next year (and the three years after that).
Yeah, Logan White.
I don't think Jackson made up the quotes.
And how do they compare to the brownies that trainwreck wants me to buy in Golden Gate Park...?
I'm using a mix, so I doubt they won't be as good.
http://tinyurl.com/2bzzzj
I should say, since I'm using a mix, the brownies won't be as good as bhsportsguy's cookies.
If it were cooler, I would make cookies from scratch and then there would be a contest.
When the Depo era was over, I still was excited because of the push for the youth movement. Colletti has by-and-large reaped benefits from that, and to his credit hasn't wasted it (yet). But my excitement dampens with each cruddy veteran that we overpay for, and every young guy we miss out on or trade (for any reason).
Rooting for mediocre veterans is not thrilling. It is not interesting. If the team isn't solidly in first, it's downright sad.
With the payroll they can wield, I honestly can't figure out why the Dodgers wouldn't take a two-pronged approach: keep the farm system crowded with tons of hot young talent (by drafting smartly and being willing to pay), and, by having a young MLB team with a relatively low payroll, targeting top-priced free agents that are the best in the game.
It just makes too much sense. Why wouldn't you take this approach?
Sorry, I don't think Sweeney has been here long enough to be at or near the top of the lackluster list. After all, he's hitting .400 and he was just showing a lot of hustle last night, going to second even though the ball was obviously foul.
Nats have the same game of chicken running with Jack McGeary who may go to Stanford. Twist is, the team has said (through "sources" that they can get agreement on the money but are unsure if they want to buck the league on slot issues - esp. since it'd be a 6th round pick somewhere above $1.5M.
They leaked last night that it was done and McG was to college. Then today other sources told the beat guy they were still working it, with the caveats described above. Crazy.
Is it worse to lose the prospect over $300G or over not wanting to ruffle Selig's feathers?
If the Cardinals win, they'll be just 3 1/2 out. The Astros are just 8 out.
Withrow has better projection but Blair has tad better present stuff. I'd probably take Withrow over Blair but Withrow hasn't pitched in 2 weeks..
I have air conditioning.
I just don't like to mix perspiration into my brownies.
Just blood and tears...?
I've got exactly 38 bucks in my wallet I'll pledge it as well.
Maybe I should have asked if was a coinicidence that last nights play involved 1 of LAs most lackluster players.
What's your definition of lackluster? I am absolutely no fan of his signing but JP has been on base 7 times in the past 3 games. How many other guys on the team can say that?
70 - why nothing but fastballs?
Is BORA$$ Blair's agent? That would explain a lot. If so, why did White draft Blair knowing he would have to deal with BORA$$? Do White and Ned never learn from their previous mistakes?
Boras is not Blair's agent.
73
probably choice A.
Except you, I guess.
because he can't throw anything else for strikes.
He is very lackluster.
http://www.beloblog.com/Pe_Blogs/baseball/dodgers/2007/08/blair_project_finished.html
Just trying to give him the benefit of the doubt over the last 3 games compared to the play of the rest of the team.
Overall, I would say he definitely lacks luster.
that doesn't even make sense considering he will probably cost more in 3 years and a top 10 pick.
Yeah, just like we got Utley the next time around. Does that ever actually happen?
You really believe anything these guys say?
No, I don't. What's your point?
That quote is just depressing.
Yeah, we really think he will be good, but we don't want to pay him for it.
well if that board took into account players they could sign, then i believe it. If it was strictly a talent board then absolutely not.
Will I get more used to it?
On the walk back last night, I saw an Indian/Pakistani restaurant on one of the streets off Leavenworth. Do you know anything about it? I might head up there for dinner...
from TJ in the comments section
To answer npurcell's question, yes, it has a LOT to do with the commish's office. Not enough teams were willing to risk Selig's wrath by going too far over slot. The more teams that do it, the less the fallout is going to be for each one that does.
From the various reports I have heard, Olson has looked real good at times, but at times still seems to take too long to decide.
Darrell Scott says he is going to take an official visit to UCLA and we seem to be among his favorites.
I don't care what he says, and what you're referring to isn't even what I was commenting on. All I said was I doubt we get Blair next time because I've never really heard of that happening.
I realize we are in the middle of an epic slide down the standings but I have felt this way since McCourt fired Depodesta. At first I did not understand what direction this team was going and now I find myself disagreeing almost every move the front office makes.
Bud Selig and wrath don't belong in the same sentence.
There's a lot of them, but I've only been to Naan n Curry, which isn't bad. Do you remember the name?
It didn't make sense that this was a money decision. That it's a fearing Selig decision makes it much worse, but more reasonable.
No, I don't think I saw the name. It had a yellow sign with black font and the words "Indian" and "Pakistani".
I say we flip Bud a double bird.
And maybe we wouldn't if the team was driving towards a pennant.
Then my guess is probably as good as yours. It may have been Shalimar (on Jones St.), which is supposed to be good.
Why are people fighting over sweaters?
>> The Colorado Rockies acquired right-handed pitcher Ramon Ortiz from the Minnesota Twins in exchange for infielder Matt Macri. <<
http://www.nbc10.com/mlb/13903110/detail.html
Mmm, now I'm craving Indian.
It wasn't Jones, because that runs parallel to Leavenworth. I'm guessing it was either Geary, O'Farrell, or Ellis.
Haha, I've been eating home made Makhani Chicken all week.
Me too. Now I might have to go to Shalimar.
Do you put special seasoning on top?
I'm going to Shalimar right now. Maybe I'll see you there.
No.
I guess I'll probably work my way through the leftover Chinese. That doesn't get better with time.
"It'd be a lot cooler if you did."
Who are you directing that toward? And who here has McCourt or Colletti's autograph?
I promise the next time I'm at dodger stadium which will be soon, I will yell in McCourts general direction, "WE WANT SIGNED DRAFT PICKS NOT MEDIOCORE AGING VETERAN PITCHERS,MIDDLE INFIELDERS,OUTFIELDERS or TOMKOS!"
>> In this installment of Stats 101, we're going to talk about minor leaguers.
More specifically, we're going to talk about how to evaluate prospects and get a better handle on what the future may hold for them. <<
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7125094
Had Colletti been there, we might have gotten somewhere. I don't know. Keep in mind McCourt defers personnel decisions to Ned.
No, there was outright criticism of his ability as a player and of the decision to sign him to a five-year contract. The best argument Josh came up with in his defense was that he didn't beat his wife.
Is there enough capital on the planet to cover that?
You're adding nine zeroes to $63 billion.
who knew a while meant two games.
--Josh Rawitch, grasping at straws 07/21/07.
>> in an era of escalating free-agent salaries, going above Major League Baseball's recommended "slot" for a top draft pick often is the right thing to do.
High-school players are a gamble. Even the best college players face a significant transition to pro ball. But talent comes at a price, and it's absurd that some teams are more devoted to the wishes of commissioner Bud Selig than the competitive desires of their own fans. <<
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/7123784
Haha. Didn't realize you were transcribing all along. Hence the silence.
What would he have said if you talked to him after the Julio Lugo trade?
He seems like a smart guy. I'd like to believe he'd know better than to even bother defending Lugo.
He might have pulled out of his dive early when he saw he wasn't going to get it.
I apologize if this is old news.
Dodgers not happy Sweeney taking heat over play
>> First base coach Mariano Duncan went over to Sweeney to make sure he was aware of the number of outs. <<
## I made a bad play. There's no excuse. I thought there was one out the whole time. But when the ball was hit, I thought there were two outs. It's not Mariano's fault. It's my fault. ##
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2976610
In that same story, Duncan describes a play where he did something else when he was playing for the Phillies.
From the details Duncan gave (7th inning against Florida with Lenny Dykstra batting), he didn't remember it correctly.
To every [thing there is] a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: ... a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; ...
It would have been intergalacticly boorish for anyone to turn DT Day into a McCourt thumping session. Which is one of the several reasons it's a good thing I didn't go.
I was getting Repko flashbacks when I saw him trying to make that catch.
What were some of those Canadian TV shows you suggested to me? I am going to see if I can get some DVDs.
"They're cleaning out his locker!"
No idea, but I bet it is a tougher decision and would have been a closer play at the plate.
http://tinyurl.com/3aj83b
Very Sexy.
If ESPN told you to jump off a bridge, would you?
How was Shalimar?
I also think bhsportsguy should be hired by the Dodgers for PR. He's better than Josh at spinning news.
I didn't care for the ambiance or the walk up there, but the food was very good.
I thought Penny was the one pitcher we had left who wouldn't be pitching with all kind of men on base, but no.
"We didn't have a meeting of the minds," said assistant general manager Logan White. "We knew it might be tough. They were up front with where they were at and never changed. We just couldn't get to where they wanted to get."
Naan n Curry is walk up. I don't like that, either.
we couldnt go that high because of ownership or we didn't want to go that high because he's not worth it?
One of today's specials was lamb brain marsala. I chose something else.
Translation: We knew what Blair wanted. We were never going to give it to him, but were just hoping he'd bring his demands down.
The Dodgers obviously dont value the picks by round. Maybe getting Kemp/Martin/LaRoche has lessened their thinking of the top 5 rounds. Add in taking Mattingly last year in the 1st, it seems they just dont care much about where players are picked.
How long did it take you to read the menu and decide what you wanted?
Heh heh. The menu at Shalimar is much shorter than that Chinese menu.
you're right. the dodgers obviously do the draft their own quirky little way.
I've heard that the Chinese restaurant in question offers a menu-on-tape, so you can start the decision process on the ride home from work.
There seems to be a pattern here...
I also recommend getting Twitch City. The DVD set contains both Season 1 and Season 2, all 13 episodes, and Amazon.com is selling it for $17.99. Did you ever get the Trailer Park Boys movie?
They might want to offer a Cliff's Notes version as well, or even better, a Cliff's Notes version on tape.
Planned to get the movie with those DVDs.
Anything weird that I can only get in Canada? Relatives making trip and asked me what I want.
Perhaps the former Jacksonville Suns Assistant GM has found a new job.
Of course I turned the sound down long age.
if what Marty? He hasn't been posting recently has he.
that should be of what Marty.
It doesn't work well, but I'm amazed I got it to work at all. Samsung advertised the printer/scanner as Mac compliant. That's not quite true. But I feel like such a geek for getting it to work!
USA! USA! USA! USA!
So I played basketball for a bit, had dinner, caught Stephen Colbert's joke about Colbert's Formula 401, and caught up on comments - glad to know D4P found a less complicated menu tonight - and didn't miss much in the game except for the Dodgers daily run.
I don't know, but you might ask them to bring back a can of soda pop or a candy bar for you. Americans often express surprise at how much sweeter soda and chocolate is in Canada, even the SAME brand names that sell in the US. I drink Diet 7-Up, and I can vouch that there is a big difference in how Diet 7-Up tastes in Canada and how it tastes in America. I found American Diet 7-Up to be foul-tasting swill when I tried it. As for why Canadian chocolate (specifically, milk chocolate) is sweeter than American chocolate, I read somewhere that American chocolate is made differently because of the hotter climates in the US. Candy bars with Canadian-made chocolate would literally melt on store shelves in many parts of the US during summer months. Oh, and it might be fun to try a bag of Canadian-made Lays chips (the plain kind). They taste quite different than the American-made Lays. Saltier.
Again, the name Grounding into Double Play is not ironic.
I know, but if the assumption behind the error is that he "should have been out", and he gets an 0-1 in the box score, doesn't that mean it "should have been a double play" too...?
well if he's on first then he didn't make two outs therefore how could it be a double play?
you can't assume the DP. It was "assumed" he would be safe at first. the error is for the advacement to second.
I have been to Canada before and I don't notice a huge difference. My father was British, so I have had a lot of that and you can tell a real difference with their sweets.
Well, it's possible to strike out without making an out...
But I'm talking about a situation where he didn't go to second, and the error is what allowed him to reach first.
First you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women...
How do you know Hillenbrand wouldn't have beaten the throw anyway? Or Berkman wouldn't have dropped it?
Official scorers never assume a double play because there are so many variables.
What if Hillenbrand had hit an easy grounder to Bruntlett, which should have been a DP in any situation, but Bruntlett dropped it and could only recover in time to get one out?
It seems that all you want to do is pick on Shea Hillenbrand.
The GIDP stat is to show simply when a batter creates TWO outs with one swing by hitting a ground ball, which is something he presumably has control over, unlike lining or flying into a DP, which is the runner's fault almost all of the time. See, the case of Sweeney vs. Houston Baseball Team (Aug. 14, 2007, 9th inning, infra.)
The only time an error is awarded on a potential DP and the runner stays at first base is when the player covering first blatantly drops a relay throw at first base.
That happens maybe 10 times a year in an entire baseball season.
there is no bout. we both now stand on the common belief that Dodger management is incompetent.
I'm not sure I remember that Sweeney game. Do you have a retrosheet link?
I've got a baseball-reference link:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN200708140.shtml
Maybe that was Frank's plan all along. To bring us together!!
Hmm...let's look at this. Nope, still doesn't ring a bell. I have no memory of this game.
Thanks anyway.
That's the situation to which I'm referring. Since the player "should have been out" and gets an out in the box score, it seems to me that he should also get a GIDP in the box score.
That's a new record for a fifth-rounder, surpassing the $900,000 that the Braves gave Matt McClendon in 1999.
That should have been Blair :(
248 -- Yes, non-diet soda pop in Canada has real sugar, and the comparable pop in the US has corn syrup subsitituted for sugar. That explains the difference there, but what about the difference in diet pop? I know that both Canadian and American Diet 7-Up is sweetened with aspertame.
Then how about Loney vs. Cincinnati Baseball Team, August 8, 2007, infra.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CIN/CIN200708080.shtml
So why does the batter get credit for grounding into a double play when there's not a double play?
You really are going to have to overcome that hurdle in this fight. Grounding into double plays is not "grounding into plays where the defense would have gotten a double play if not for an error."
The batter already gets an at bat and no hit. Why do you wish to punish the batter further for something that didn't happen?
It makes absolutely no sense.
The GIDP is one of the most sensibly designed stats that baseball has.
Because the ball went about 170 feet.
The fly ball to CF by Kent was short, it was a good call by the windmill in my opinion.
The Tree weeps!
http://tinyurl.com/2jnn9a
Loneys fly ball was plenty deep, 3-2 Stros.
Abreu went 0-3 with a walk, and Hu went 1-4 with a homer. It's a double header, but the second game appears to be postponed.
(just kidding)
So, 6-99?
I could say the same thing about strikeouts with wild pitches/passed balls that enable the hitter to go to first. If you can strike out while making zero outs, maybe you should be able to double play while making one out.
The batter already gets an at bat and no hit
But if the runner is out, and the hitter gets an out in the box score, doesn't that essentially add up to two outs that the hitter was responsible for...?
so when the music stops, the dodgers are left without a chair to sit in.
Martiiiiiiiiiiiin!
He's back!!
Preposterous.
Golden. God.
The dropped third strike rule has been around for almost as long as baseball has existed. You're too hung up on the word "out" appearing in the word. Strikeout does not always mean "out."
But if the runner is out, and the hitter gets an out in the box score, doesn't that essentially add up to two outs that the hitter was responsible for...?
On the play you've described, there is only one out on the play. The runner on second is out.
I would have to say that this idea of expanding the definition of a GIDP is a quixotic battle that only a Sancho Panza drunk on sangria would join in on.
Welcome back, Russell!
double posts sandwiched in by a telemachos post.
http://www.slate.com/id/2172223/
That's been covered on Baseball Analysts for a few months now. It's by the non Baseball Prospectus Joe Sheehan.
that is something new and out of the box.
Would he be allowed to work out with Stanford or use their facilities during the school year?
And I'm not even watching the game. I can feel it from here. (I'm in the desert where the cable TV doesn't pick up any baseball unless it's on Fox network, TBS or ESPN. I look to you all and Gameday.)
I would think the guy could use Stanford's facilities just like any other student. But he couldn't work out with the Stanford baseball team without running afoul of a dozen NCAA regulations.
I didn't know that ever stopped anyone.
Trust me, you don't want to go to an All-Star Game.
Seeing one in person will disabuse you of any idea that they are enjoyable.
I say 3.
Man, Furcal was really favoring that ankle, huh?
Did you go to either of the Anaheim All-Star games?
I don't believe you're old enough to have gone to the July 11, 1967 game.
I almost forgot how bad the Astros bullpen is, partially because the Dodgers had been so feeble this series until today, and late last night. Whatever, I'll take it.
Let's hope he was right.
The Dodgers have to catch the Cubs first.
Credit where credit is due, in fairness - Pierre's had a very nice series. Don't get to say that very often...
---
off subject, but a skunk, perhaps commenting on the Astros bullpen or the Dodgers' month, has sprayed somewhere near my house. Ugh. I may have to step aside for a minute to close windows and light candles.
Maybe D4P met up with the Golden Gate Park people after all.
I don't want to go to a game if we get one, but I imagine the team wants one. Doesn't really matter though, the Yankee's go over slot all the time and got their farewell ASG no problem. I know the Yankee's bring in more money than we do, but we're still a big storied franchise. The point is as someone else asked, what's the wrath of Selig we have to worry about incurring by going over slot?
As much as we love Dodger Stadium, the allure of having an All-Star Game in the most famous stadium in the history of the sport is pretty hard to avoid.
With the exception of Yankee Stadium, MLB wants its All-Star Games in new stadiums.
If McCourt said he was going to tear the place down and build a new one, there would be an ASG in L.A.
That was a thriller!
it never existed when the only wrath casted by MLB to teams was a scolding.
If they want to make it work, they need some sort of punishment for teams that go over slot. For example, if you go over slot, we take away your first round pick for next year.
But I got bored.
It was an educated guess. And weren't you in Berkeley around that time? '88, maybe?
Ouch. Am I that hard to stomach?
In the summer of 1987, I was in between undergrad at UCLA and moving up to Berkeley. Jay Howell lost that game and then lost his job as closer to Dennis Eckersley soon after.
I'm a busy man. I have no time for the likes of you.
It was one sentence.
In '88, I returned from the Seoul Olympics to Stanford a few days into Fall Quarter (also in the middle of the NLCS). I was catching up on schoolwork, so I didn't try to go to Los Angeles for the World Series.
Daniel, what did you major in?
Bah! No time!
Okay, I better log off for the evening. Let's try for - gasp! - two in a row tomorrow.
It was my fault, though, because I had told my students about all of the times I cheated and lied as an undergrad. One particular instance was when my sister and I took Freshman Comp together. Our black ink had run out, and we were poor, so we had to print our papers in purple ink. But come the end of the quarter, neither of us turned in our final papers, sheerly out of laziness. My sister was ready to take the failing grade; I, of course, was not. So I went to the professor and told her that my sister and I had not gotten our papers back.
The professor looked perplexed and searched through her back for a few minutes, finally turning to me and saying, "I know you turned them in. I remember reading them, they were purple, right?" She offered to let us email the papers to her that night. Of course I told her that our computer had crashed. So she said "That's fine, it's my fault, since I lost it. I'll just average out your grades from the rest of the semester."
Life can be good sometimes.
A 21st Century lament.
I had to order a magenta toner cartridge for work. It cost $210!
That's what she said.
We really did win? Hmm. Same meal again tomorrow night, then; Polish sausage, hash browns, fried eggs, rye toast.
-- Astros announcer Jim Deshaies on Jonathan Broxton
BTW, good win. Russ is 6 homers and 2 steals away from 20-20 right?
Was he really that excited about breaking Houston's modest win streak?
vr, Xei
Penny didn't look great but good enough. It was a lot of fun to see Kemp, Loney and Martin swing the bats well. JP deserves a lot of credit, he had some good ABs. All in all it was the kind of game you hope for on a beautiful Aug. evening.
Just kidding.
And yet you could never see the taillights leaving the Astrodome.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6545
"The only thing MLB can do is fine you if you don't call them first," said one scouting director, who then went into detail about the process, the annoyance in his voice coming through perfectly. "You call MLB and say you want to go over slot, and they tell you not to, and that they've worked so hard to put this system in place and that you are blowing everything up." From there, things get uglier. "Now, the process can't continue until MLB talks not to your GM, but to your ownership, where they will once again yell about your team messing everything up, but also often telling them that their own scouting director is doing the wrong thing here," he added. "Unfortunately, there are owners who listen."
The key to getting an over-slot deal done seems to then rely on having a supportive internal management structure. "In the end, you have to have a strong enough ownership where you can tell him that signing this player for big money is in the best interest of the organization," he continued. "When that happens, the owner has to call MLB back and let them know that their message has been heard and considered, but we're doing it anyway. Then after MLB yells at you one more time, you sign the guy. It's a bad process."
Obviously, Frank McCourt can't take the heat; Arte Moreno, George Steinbrenner and whoever owns the Tigers can. The fact that the negotiations took such a squirrelly path, with the player essentially conceding almost his entire position, suggests McCourt told White that no matter what, he didn't want to pick up the phone and find Bud on the other end.
>> "Any team that passes on some guy over 200 grand is killing themselves," he observed. "If you're not taking the best player on the board because you 'can't', you're just hurting yourself." <<
Can the union really be sure of this? What's to prevent money saved from going into the owners pocket?
The only way this is in the Dodgers' interest is if the bhsportsguy theory about White having second thoughts about Blair based on the, what? two weeks of summer league? is right, though that doesn't seem likely. Or, I guess, if they're doing it to gain hand in future negotiations (if a signability underdraft prospect gets picked by a team notorious for ignoring slot, they have good reason not to drop their price as much as they might for a team that lets Bud Selig boss them around). But the Dodgers must already have take-it-or-leave-it bona fides, given the list of unsigned picks that keep going at the top of subsequent drafts. Having hand isn't worth anything if you don't use it. And, anyway, it seems unlikely that it could be worth as much as a good pitching prospect. Or the next one, or the next one. . .
I guess this could just be conspiracy theorizing, and it could really just be about the cash. Either way, it's a structural problem. A costly one.
I'm trying not to make too big a deal of this Blair situation -- because TINSTAAPP, after all -- but it's becoming increasingly clear that McCourt is all too happy to be in Selig's back pocket.
http://www.community-newspapers.com/archives/lgwt/20030827/
I'm now sufficiently disappointed. Next.
Blair negotiated himself out of the first round and then negotiated himself out of fifth round slot money. With admitted limited knowledge of everything I put the blame on Blair and not the Dodgers.
The issue is, that basically, the Dodgers refused to take advantage of a flaw in the drafting system that would allow them to basically have the equivalent of multiple first round picks if ownership had any guts at all.
I also believe that many had said at around the time of the draft that Blair had any asking price for not going to college, it was just a matter of whether or not teams were going to meet it.
Pierre
Martin
Loney
Kemp
Ethier
Kent
Hillenbrand
Furcal
Call me crazy but I think we should be batting our 5 hottest hitters in the first 5 spots of the line-up.
Ethier and Pierre are the only ones hitting at all this month.
Pierre - .855
Martin - .682
Loney - .613
Kemp - .667
Ethier - .957
Kent - .194 (30 ab's)
Hillenbrand - .597 (8 ab's)
Furcal - .556
If a budget is set for the draft, he sticks to it.
I'm not saying he won't explore it but in the end, he goes with feels right to him.
Having a set of principles and sticking to them is not a bad way to run a business.
The amateur draft and signing international amateur free agents is Logan's domain and I have not heard anything from him the past 6 years to indicate he has ever been held back from signing a player for lack of funds and in fact, he has said that he has a very good relationship with Ned (who did promote him last year).
Also, the organization backed Logan White in the Hochevar debacle.
Again, is it just possible that Logan White did not agree with the other "experts" about Kyle Blair being a first round pick, etc.
Can he be wrong about that, sure, but that why he get's paid to make these decisions.
Sometimes when you have to look for conspiracies and the like, you have to accept what is presented to you. I just think Logan believes in the system, he is not going to use it like the Yankees, Red Sox or Tigers.
If some of you disagree with that, I understand, but I just think he's going to run it his way.
June:
50 at bats: .440/.472/.780
July:
94 at bats: .298/.356/.394
August
45 at bats: .222/.280/.333
Will the real James Loney please stand up?
A couple of days ago you told me there were no big boys in the draft. Has your position changed?
I'm not sure how sticking to a budget and ethics have anything in common. It us not unethical to realize that the budget needs to be increased if an opportunity presents itself to improve the organization and no laws or promises are being broken.
I'm down on the team, but I admit such failures do not add confidence in our management. I've been a Dodger fan all my life, and yet begin to wonder if this kind of loyalty isn't a kind of idiotic attachment to a defunct "brand." If the McCourt/Colletti years aren't going to improve upon the Fox fiasco, then "Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim" begins to have a far less heretical ring. I'd like to root for a well-run franchise whose commitment to winning is something more than rhetorical. I will say: this off-season is crucial, far more than the past few have been, since our kids have arrived and we now know, I think, what the missing pieces are. (Hint: they aren't Luis Gonzales.) If we're going to win at long last, then we're going to have to do some things that aren't trading Matt Kemp or signing middling talent. We'll see, then, what happens.
My feeling is that the decision not to sign Blair may have been poor one, but it's like any GM or team decision - it can't really be determined whether or not it was bad at the moment it was made. The argument that we are spending too much money on washed up players is a good one, but I think it's a separate problem. Perhaps the money we "saved" here could go towards signing an impact free agent next year, or something else.
Basically, if Blair signs with another team and becomes a star, we will all curse Colletti and Co., but if he turns out to be Edwin Jackson, I don't think anyone will remember this day.
Kyle Blair was the one player he drafted because he had slid due to his bonus demands and signability becuase of his "strong" committment to San Diego.
Remember, he drafted Price, Savery, and White in the mid teens where he has said that he was taking a shot but never really thought he would sign them. I just think he did the same thing with Blair, he said as much in his chat (responding to Nate's question) the week after the draft.
Again if the Dodgers had drafted players like the Yankees, Red Sox and Tigers and then they didn't sign them, I could buy the scenario the McCourt does not want to buck to system, but they don't.
Now is that Frank and Ned dictating to White who to draft, pretty doubtful, I think its White's way of running things.
Ah, Ed Jackson at this point would be a sight for sore eyes for this rotation. His last game shows he's still got some dynamite in his arm.
Question: So what do the Dodgers need to get back in the race. Pitching is dismal and the hitting, other than Martin stinks?
Jonah Keri: (12:46 PM ET ) The thing is, Martin has been pretty punchless over the past few weeks too. Between the Dodgers overworking him to death in the first half, and one too many workouts with Alyssa Milano, the poor guy's spent. I was talking about the Dodgers being a threat to drop out of the race weeks ago...just was never sold on that roster.
__________________________________________________
And then there is this:
Reader: I take it you are not a Ned Colletti fan? I mean who wouldn't want Tomko, Hendrickson, Schmidt, Gonzo & Pierre on their team for 40 million this year.
Jonah Keri: (1:09 PM ET ) I interviewed Ned Coletti a few years ago (searching archives to track this down)...Ah, here we go, Part I and Part II.
Anyway, he was fun to talk to. Used to be a writer, a bit curmudgeonly (in a fun way), pretty candid. One thing that struck me at the time: He was a big Neifi Perez fan. HUGE. When I heard he was the Dodgers' new GM, I couldn't help thinking about his Neifi fetish, and how that might translate into his first GM job. Just sayin'.
If Blair said he would sign for first round money, why didn't any team draft him in the first round? If Blair were my son I would want him to go to college and accept the gamble that he might not get a $ Million when he is eligible again. If he can't get that $ Million three years from now he probably wouldn't have gotten into AA ball during that same time if he had signed yesterday.
If my son were a good student and wanted to go to college I am not so sure I would appreciate some MLB team trying to lure him into the low minors with more than slot money. Give the Dodgers credit for appearing to have integrity.
Put me on the side of the Dodgers on this one. My biggest complaint with the Dodgers is not who they have signed or not signed but with who is getting playing time.
He really needs to play CF in order to be an well above average player.
Put him in CF, and he can be really useful.
At a corner spot, he worries me.
19bbs in 310 is not exactly Encarnacion-esque, but its close.
Don't take it the wrong way, I think they are just saying you do a better job of arguing why the Dodgers are doing something then the people actually making the decisions.
I haven't agreed with you in over a month but you do at least make compelling arguements and make the rest of us try harder when explaining our distaste for the recent actions by Dodger management.
Don't take it the wrong way, I think they are just saying you do a better job of arguing why the Dodgers are doing something then the people actually making the decisions.
I haven't agreed with you in over a month but you do at least make compelling arguements and make the rest of us try harder when explaining our distaste for the recent actions by Dodger management.
He's just trying to add perspective. Bhsportsguy is management material.
I can not confirm this in writing anywhere...anyone seen anything?
Josh writes his blogs, and he just seems like a cheerleader most of the time.
Being tactful and presenting actual arguments, like bhsportsguy does, would improve his pr'ing IMO.
436 Also Alyssa Milano said on the radio last week the same thing and added she was not dating athletes anymore. I guess she can only prove that by not dating them.
Also, has JoshR said anything about her blog no longer being linked on the Dodgers.com site.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/news/blogs/index.jsp
I think it got bumped off the Dodgers.com home page to make room for this blog:
http://detrasdelosdodgers.mlblogs.com/
I can't recall if it was ever linked directly from Josh's ITD blog.
Until there's a rookie salary cap (like the NFL has), or what the NBA has, I think the high revenue baseball teams should take advantage of the system and go all out to sign these guys above slot money.
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20060625&content_id=1522396&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb#lad
https://bronxbanter.baseballtoaster.com/archives/767332.html
As you can see in 450 , there are many Dodger MLB blogs that don't get linked on the Dodgers.com home page. It's not as if Alyssa has a right to a home page link (not that it isn't a good idea to have her there).
MLB reduced the slots 10% this year from last year and while it appears it didn't work it really did. Instead of bonus's increasing year to year the agents could say they got a win by showing the were paid over slot and ignore the fact the slot was the same as last year. This way the agents got a win and so did MLB baseball because even though a lot of teams went over slot they weren't spending more money then they did in 2006.
Perhaps you have a very intuitive DVD player which is no longer bothering to play films which might be too fun for your tastes.
Last week I went to Blockbuster an extra two times because a) The first game was cracked in the middle and b) the second one was the wrong game in the box.
The guy at the counter became suspicious of me and told me he could not do anymore exchanges after the third time. I felt like saying, "I have better things to do with my time than driving back and forth to Blockbuster"
Justin (Seattle): Hey Keith, I've read that at the end of the day the Dodgers and Kyle Blair were only $400K apart in negotiations. If that's the case, and the Dodgers believe that he's a 1st round talent, why not spend the extra dough? You know they have it. Is this pressure from MLB or what's going on here? To me this is ridiculous, Logan White is smarter than this.
Keith Law: (1:26 PM ET ) I don't think Blair was worth first-round money, and he was allegedly asking for a dollar figure around the slot # for the Dodgers' first pick (#20 overall). He was a second-rounder in this draft, and I can understand the Dodgers not wanting to overpay him by $400K or so.
The DVD player has lasted only 1/3 as long as the VCR.
Nice find. I like being talked off the bridge.
Wow, Bob, which brand of DVD player did you get? I still have a model from Phillips/Magnavox that I bought when DVD first came out, still going strong at my Aunt's house :)
http://www.amazon.com/Memorex-CD-DVD-Player-Laser-Lens-Cleaner/dp/B00008EM7U
This is especially true if once you put your DVDs in, it just makes a whirring sound but no picture comes up.
VCR?
3 in the loge
Email molokai@yahoo.com
Subject Dodger Game
Last chance to see future HOF Biggio play in Dodger Stadium.
It's a Toshiba SE-R0047.
The DVDs get stuck in the middle.
welp, I've got the model number for the remote control. How about the dvd player itself?
But the "Check coolant" light never came on. Nor did the "Temperature" warning light come on.
Actually Bob, it sounds like one of those '02 models like my parents have... also a Toshiba. I'd go for a new JVC or a Pioneer unit which should be more compatible. Again sorry to hear about the DVD player trouble.
I sort of look at DVD players now the way I look at magazine subscriptions. Every so often I have to shell out to renew.
That happens to me on my laptop DVD player. Ever since I bought it (brand new), DVDs start getting stuck about 2/3 of the way in. I initially thought it was "overheating", but ruled that out when I discovered that I could start the DVD at the same spot the next day (when the laptop was not hot) and it would still have the problem.
https://badaltitude.baseballtoaster.com/archives/767371.html
For now.
I wasn't covering any vents.
Back to the classic "Death of a Fruitman" episode from "The Bob Newhart Show."
I have come to same conclusion. I am happy to have one last over three years.
The old "add insult to injury" gambit. Works like a charm!
I'm beginning to think the stupid move was drafting him in the first place. Either he was first-round talent that serendipitously fell into our laps and could be had for the right price, or he's not, and we drafted the wrong guy. Thinking we could have a first-round player at wrong-guy money is delusional. Has that worked even once?
Of course, at age 21, Encarnacion hit .323/.394/.560 in AA and got 33 at bats with the Tigers.
My path to power is being blocked by such events. And a series of restraining orders and "shoot on sight" orders from the Secret Service.
I have a midweek day off. I have to work Fri-Wed.
Then stop renting so many Stealers Wheel concert DVDs!
I used to work in a video store back when it was all VHS and was often tempted to start wearing gloves and using tongs when people would return their tapes, just from all the gross stains they'd have on the boxes. So.. anyway... You can try cleaning them using rubbing alcohol and a clean dry cloth and wiping gently from the edge toward the center. Assuming they're not just hopelessly scratched. Some DVD players are indeed more finicky about that kind of thing. My gf's machine is constantly getting stuck whereas mine almost never does.
http://tinyurl.com/37b2r4
But only on my Netflix discs.
This is for Bob, especially:
http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub121/sec6.html
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6597
I get so tired of guys like Byrnes still being called 4th outfielders long after they should have shed that tag.
The Dodgers released veteran catcher Ben Davis, who batted .218 in 36 games at Las Vegas. The move was made to clear a roster spot for Chad Moeller, the catcher the Dodgers acquired last week from Cincinnati's Triple-A Louisville affiliate. Moeller made his debut for the 51s on Tuesday, going 2 for 3 with an RBI.
The Dodgers are expected to promote one of the 51s' catchers, Moeller or Ken Huckaby, to the majors for the September roster expansion. <<
http://www.presstelegram.com/sports/ci_6635040
The disc which sits in my old Toshiba, probably never to come out again, is a CDR of the sixth Harry Potter audio book, MP3s, which now seem more interesting than the first time around. You know, you think you're being clever using all your resources, then one of them just stops! I've had pretty good luck with Philips CD players in the past, so I am hoping they'll be good for DVDs too.
SFW, Earthquake info.
http://tinyurl.com/2jjp9c
But I did find an old case for glasses that had a cloth for cleaning. So I put that on the DVD player. This is the momentous day in my life since I figured out how to get my scanner to work.
Amazingly, Pujols is still tied for the league lead in a "down" year.
When I was a kid, I used to eat parts of my parents' 8-track tape player.
So far no me haf brain damug.
"they remained ensconced in fourth place in the National League West, a daunting 62 games behind division-leading Arizona"
Try ½
I mean try "& frac 12 ;" with no spaces.
Is that the one where "Mr. Gianelli's dead!"?
Indeed it is.
Elliott Carlin - "Gianelli didn't even show up for his funeral!"
Emily Hartley - "How was that?"
Elliott - "He donated his body to science."
Mrs. Bakerman - "Yes, I believe it was astrology."
For some reason the "Kemp can't hit a curve ball" mantra continued in the seats behind me on Tuesday night. Of course, his second hit was replayed on the big screen, and it was a breaking ball.
I didn't say anything because my wife hates it when I butt into conversations at Dodger stadium. I was very tempted to ask where he got such information.
1. Radio Nowhere
2. You'll Be Comin' Down
3. Livin' in the Future
4. Your Own Worst Enemy
5. Gypsy Biker
6. Girls in Their Summer Clothes
7. I'll Work for Your Love
8. Magic
9. Last to Die
10. Long Walk Home
11. Devil's Arcade
"The album, other than its atmospheric title track, is billed as Springsteen's return to rock 'n' roll after his solo "Devils & Dust" and the folk-inspired "The Seeger Sessions." Fans can expect Clarence Clemons' familiar saxophone, Danny Federici's soaring keyboards and Max Weinberg's pounding drums -- along with a lot of guitars."
There's a pattern of White's picking players who end up being monster prospects in somebody else's system because instead of signing them, the Dodgers don't. White's an employee of the Dodgers, not of MLB, or The Bud Selig Competitive Balance Through Cheating Teenagers Initiative. He has no ethical obligation to leave good players on the table for other teams. If he isn't getting a budget sufficient to sign all the players he wants, the budget is wrong (Jon's point). If he isn't getting support from management to go over slot, then management is wrong. If he has some theory of the platonic ideal price of each prospect and won't budge, then that's wrong. He's spectacular at the other parts of his job, so it's a flaw that's probably worth putting up with. But that doesn't make it noble.
That's both good and bad. It's good she's a Dodgers fan. It's bad that she has fallen under the spell of Jeff Kent.
Expect to be told to hustle more in your chores around the house.
531 I think the consensus opinion is that Price was unlikely to sign for any amount, while White, like Blair, was signable at the right price, and almost certainly worth the money. Savery, I'm not sure about.
I think the game would be blocked by a lot of V-chips.
And why is it wrong if he won't budge if he truly believes that player isn't worth what he is asking for, that is what he is paid to do, evaluate talent, put a value on it, and then try to sign them for the Dodgers. There will be times that it won't work out and I don't see why it has to be on him and the Dodgers to make it work out everytime.
Price: " A Vanderbilt signee, Price is an excellent student who is just scratching the surface of his prodigious talent. He'll either go high in this draft or replace [Jeremy] Sowers in the Commodores rotation."
Sounds like Price and Savery were both considered good bets to attend college (then again, so was Andy LaRoche). Alex White's scouting report, on the other hand, appears to assume he would sign; it makes no mention of the possibility of him attending college.
And Rick Ankiel drew a walk!
Just because the market has been screwed with to artificially depress the cost of these players, doesn't mean there isn't a true value. And it doesn't mean the refusing to take the bet on what Law reports was a $400k price difference is prudent. There are a finite number of draft picks for each team, so it's not like I'm demanding that the Dodgers go out and sign every last pitcher at a million bucks a pop. I'm saying, White liked him enough to draft him two months ago. He liked him enough to sign him, yesterday, for what is not significantly (in baseball terms) less money. It's a bad fold. And I'm not convinced you disagree with that.
Regardless, I think you are definately very right.
But I add the cream myself!
546 "did I miss the part where it was reported that the Dodgers were offering $700M?"
If that's the case, then young Mr. Blair got some very bad advice from his agent. ;)
You don't go to Starbucks much; when you do you just tag along with other people since you have nothing better to do. You would like to order a Tazo Chai Crème but don't know how to pronounce it. Most people who drink medium caramel thing without coffee are strippers.
Of course I usually flip them the bird once their backs are turned. I have been known to strip on occasion though.
And in a much better section than where bhsportsguy, Vishal, and I will be sitting.
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/767532.html
Furcal SS
Ethier RF
Kemp CF
A-Rod 3B
Loney 1B
Martin C
Young LF
Abreu 2B assuming kent hangs it up, or is moved to the AL.....
Ned would never do this....sigh....
And, really, I'm much more irritated that Colletti re-signed Nomar, and didn't offer Maddux arbitration, taking three more potential picks away from White, since three is more than one. Think of how many pinch hitters Colletti could acquire in 2009 if White had had three more picks in the first and supplemental round this year!
http://tinyurl.com/2bbcoa
This is not a drill!
Thanks for the heads up....
Orange alert = needs a triple?
Although I'm not certain if this is correct, because homers are much more common than triples and the two should really not be sharing a color.
Foiled by the alert system yet again! One of these years I will get it straight. Especially if I can get Edward James Olmos to teach me some calculus.
If you need a double, it's always orange. Even if you're Magglio Ordonez.
If you need a single, it's always red.
If you need a homer, it varies between yellow and orange depending upon how likely I think the player is to hit a homer. If Juan Pierre needed a homer, it would be yellow. If Cecil Fielder needed a homer, it would be orange.
If I don't think the player is likely to bat again, I don't declare an alert.
567- Sometimes Orange means home run or double. It depends on the player. Bob's is a system as intricate as it is whimsical.
Cecil was passed by Piazza on the all-time triples list today!
Are your seats in Section 56, Vishal?
It should be gray. He is the kind of player who makes it hard to decide these things.
>>BA had this scouting report on Tim: "Because of an unorthodox delivery and long, thin frame, Sexton draws comparisons to Bronson Arroyo. His delivery is best described as an exaggerated drop and drive, in which his right knee is almost completely on the ground before he vaunts himself over his front side. His fastball ranges from 87-91 mph and he can pitch at 88 deep into games. His fastball has average life with fair downward plane, despite his delivery. Sexton has feel for his secondary stuff as well, especially his changeup, which shows occasional plus movement. His slider has better break than his curve. It's unconventional but effective, as Sexton is able to show average command and plenty of deception."
Sexton has a successful season for the Braves, going 5-1, 3.94, with a 1.10 WHIP, 2.3 BB/9, and 7.9 K/9. (His peripheral numbers are significantly better than his ERA. I wonder how that happened.) One of Staunton's front office told me that Tim works incredibly hard at his craft; the Braves' coaches were amazed at his work ethic. That, obviously, bodes well for his future.
And by the way, Tim has thrown in one game so far for the Great Lakes Loons, the Dodgers' Midwest League affiliate. He threw 5 shutout innings in relief, giving up 2 hits, 0 walks, and striking out 6. Nice start!<<
Pierre, CF
Kemp, RF
Kent, 2B
Loney, 1B
Martin, C
Ethier, LF
Hillenbrand, 3B
Lowe, P
OK, I'll meet you over there. The library has seats in a bunch of sections on that side and we'll all just find a place to sit.
"Juan continues to be questioned. He's the first to admit that he hasn't had the type of season he's capable of or that we expected when he was signed, but try to remember that if the rest of the team was playing well this month, we'd be better off and if he had played well when they weren't slumping, we might still be in first place. The bottom line is, the Dodgers win as a team and they lose as a team, not from one guy in the lineup."
"Consumer electronics don't last as long since they went lead free. That tiny bit of lead in the solder made the connections last longer"
(also, thanks again bob)
But nearly everybody else from work is on the LF side. For some reason, they gave me one on the sunny side.
I know that earlier in this season I wrote a letter to McCourt telling him we need to bring up the kids such as Kemp and Loney, and also suggesting we get a new hitting coach. Needless to say I was pleased when my ideas were acted upon soon after writing him (probably just a coincidence).
In fact, based on that, maybe it would be more productive to write to McCourt.
Then we can try to get the Dodgers to sell them at the concession stands.
I can retire early!
RE: 585 I will say this, Pierre can scarcely be blamed for the Dodgers' hitting/scoring woes over the past week, at any rate. He's been getting on base recently when few others have with any consistency. As for the rest of the season, or the rest of his contract, maybe not so much.
I don't believe in the *
What about a ground rule double...?
Makes you wonder how much differently this team would be perceived if they played .500 ball all year long as opposed to camping out in 1st place then collapsing. The papers ran with the Bill Mueller story while it fit. Now you have the aging vets and the stumbling kids. We're pacing for 82 wins sans Schmidt so we were probably an 85-88 win team all along regardless of the ups and downs.
It would have just been a single. You only get the extra bases on an over-the-fence homer.
And if Shea Hillenbrand had hit, he would have been credited with a GIDP too.
Preposterous! If batted balls that fly over the outfield wall in fair territory are always HRs, then batted balls that bounce over the outfield wall in fair territory should always be ground rule doubles.
I'm adding this to my list.
Not yet.
They're only home runs if the fence is over 250 feet away from home. If not, they're doubles.
Stand down.
Cf. Ventura vs. McGlinchy, 1999.
See also Adcock vs. Haddix, 1959.
Therefore, it looked like Pierre was doing well. However, it was only in comparison to the rest of the lineup.
Check out the Dodgers entry. What a trainwreck this would have been!
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=lukas/070816
He would have been credited with a single though because the bases would have been loaded and only one base was needed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inA-36YRV0Y&
So what you would get is four pages with the information and the barcode. A "ticket" as you know it, is not emailed to you.
Rendezvous in Section 55 now. The security question will be "Name 5 intersting things said by Karl Dorrell". If someone answers with loud laughter, then you've got the right person.
That's a fearsome attack in NL West terms.
The ticket takers scan every ticket regardless of its format.
I don't think there are many made now that don't have a barcode on it.
Some stadiums have systems where you get sent a barcode to your cellphone and then you display the barcode to a special reader for entrance.
No paper is ever created.
I am pretty sure that Kent's "porn-star" mustache pushes her away from being too much of a fan.
You're welcome.
I wonder who will be first to use the cellphone tickets in Southern California: the Dodgers, Angels, or Padres?
You must be on a 29-second delay.
They don't always do the wrong thing, and there is a certain flexibility there at work. Now if only Betemit hadn't been traded... But even there, Proctor had the right stuff yesterday, basically filling Tsao's shoes. If we still had Betemit, we wouldn't have Proctor and we'd have seen Hernandez out there instead. Or maybe Hull or Houlton, I suppose, but don't count on it.
You could try that, but the ticket takers would likely hassle you.
Because they are used to only two types of tickets: the paper ones and the electronic ones.
If you make your own, you're on your own.
So far we have two Molinas, I doubt a third will do it since Jose is not starting and short of an extra inning game, I cannot see him playing today.
Jose Molina has a chance to play today. The Tigers are already up 6-1 in the second.
I'm pretty sure that only electronic tickets can be e-mailed.
For security, they will want the tickets to appear in certain formats.
My parents told me that we didn't need to do that.
Even Will Call made me nervous, so you can imagine what e-tickets do to me. What if somebody made a copy of it before I retrieved it from the printer? And they beat me to the stadium?
Infielders (click column headers to sort)
Num Name Pos Bat Thw Ht Wt Age DOB Status 40-man MLB
5 Tony Abreu 2B S R 5' 11" 200 22 11-13-1984 Active Yes
8 Chin-Lung Hu SS R R 5' 11" 190 23 02-02-1984 Active No
23 Andy LaRoche 3B R R 6' 1" 225 23 09-13-1983 Disabled 7-Day Yes
http://tinyurl.com/2xr3fr
Every time I think I worry excessively, I always find out that someone surpasses me!
Thanks, Nagman! ;-)
Report: LAD, COL, interested in D. Willis
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2978062
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SFN/SFN196508121.shtml
Felipe hit one the day before.
I bought a pair of UCLA football season tickets from a guy on Craigs List. And he sold them at face value.
And if so, did you make eye contact?
He mailed them to me.
I sold some tickets to the Hollywood Bowl and the woman came to work and gave me cash for them. She was very nice.
I didn't realize, for some reason, that Hu was older than Abreu.
I used to have a one-third stake in Dodgers seasons tickets up until 2004 and only went to 14-16 games and sold the rest on Ebay, usually at close to face value.
Go tell it on the mountain!
I hope this won't be the fire next time.
If you want to two free tickets to tonight's game, you can just have them. You can even dress up in a multi-colored Astros uniform.
He finished his career in Another Country, though he never actually recorded a regular season inning:
http://ca.sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/5344
"D. Willis pinch hit for R. Wolf"
http://www.baseball-reference.com/w/willido03.shtml
I'm sure Dontrelle has a bounceback year in him - I just don't trust that it will start in September 2007.
I'm afraid we've been fielding a lineup of Invisible Men for the past month.
I actually attended what was probably Baldwin's best start as a Dodger:
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/LAN/LAN200108040.shtml
Interesting Baldwin similarity scores:
1. Ramon Ortiz (974)
10. Brett Tomko (938)
At least the White Sox sent money with Baldwin and he only cost Jeff Barry, Onan Masaoka (best Dodger name until Alberto Bastardo), and Gary Majewski.
Will their be smokers and naked women? If so, I recommend we all wear really baggy shorts...
* Containers larger than 1 liter in size
I'm going to assume "yes" depending on size.
706 - Is that Kim Ng's department?
I'm assuming it's OK for Tupperware. I have my name on it too!
>> In 12 years, Sweeney has been traded five times, released three times, signed with a club as a free agent seven times and granted free agency four times. Heck, he's had three different stints with the San Diego Padres alone. <<
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/10297903
"The only thing that gets me to watch a game these days is my sick desire to see if it can get any worse. Can they go 300 at-bats without a run-scoring single? Can a double-amputee shut them out? Will Grady Little bat Pierre in the cleanup spot? Stay tuned."
Bat Man Begins
I couldn't help laughing. :-)
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.