
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
Dodger Thoughts T-Shirts
On sale through February 16, 2008


Click here to order.
* * *
The Best of Dodger Thoughts
A 325-page book featuring the top selections from this website from 2002-2005.
Click here for more information.
* * *
Or, just make a donation to support the site. Many thanks.
"Dodger Thoughts, like TiVo, is one of those things you can completely do without until you start using it."
- Fanerman
SI.com
NL West Preview
Evaluating Defense
Colletti and Depo
World Baseball Classic
Minor League Broadcasters
Slow Starts
Eric Gagne
Groundball Pitchers
Dodger Prospects
Albert Pujols
Humbled Angels
You Be the Manager
Eric Gagne II
Unreliable Relievers
Revived Angels
It's Okay To Sell
Dodger Turnaround
Andre Ethier
Padres-Dodgers Showdown
NL Final Weekend
Mets-Dodgers NLDS
Postseason ratings
NL Wish Lists
Manny vs. J.D.
McGwire Controversy
Dodger Offense
Trainers Matter
Variety
Will Arnett
John C. McGinley
Laura Dern
Imelda Staunton
SAG Awards
Ellen Pompeo
Grey's Anatomy
2004-05 Rookie Dramas
Anthony Hopkins
NATPE
Scrubs
Award Shows
Topher Grace
Ashton Kutcher
Writing on Improv Shows
Rainn Wilson
T.R. Knight
Guest Actors
Animation Guests
Joey Carson and Tennis
Donald Trump and Golf
2006 Emmys Nominees*
*Comedy Series
*Comedy Director
*Comedy Writer
*Comedy Actor
*Comedy Supporting Actor
Blue's Clues
Lizzy Caplan
Ann Donahue
CMT: Giants
CMA Awards
Little Miss Sunshine
Actor-Directors
Freshman Series
Clint Eastwood
Showrunners vs. Censors
Little Children
Breaking and Entering
Tartikoff Legacy Awards
Jackie Earle Haley
Knights of Prosperity
Office Online
2007 Screenplay Noms
Friday Night Lights
Robert Benton
ABC Fridays
Rookie Actors
Global Casting
2007 Pilot Casting
Sublime Slime
Also ...
A Season in Savannah (Stanford Magazine)
Five Questions: Los Angeles Dodgers (2005) (Hardball Times)
Rick Monday (Baseball Analysts)
Baseball's Odd Couple (Baseball Prospectus)
Five Questions: Los Angeles Dodgers (2006) (Hardball Times)
Five Questions: Los Angeles Dodgers (2007) (Hardball Times)
Dodger home record: 35-27 (.565)
When Jon attended: 4-3 (.571)
When Jon didn't: 31-24 (.564)
Dodgers at home: 745-600 (.554)
Jon attended: 293-233 (.557)*
Jon didn't: 457-374 (.550)
* includes road games attended
Current Roster with Estimated 2008 Salaries
(updated March 28)
Most figures are estimates (some are wild estimates) but will be updated as information comes in. Corrections welcome.
More contract details here.
Starting Pitchers (5)
$12,300,000 Hiroki Kuroda
$10,000,000 Derek Lowe
$9,500,000 Brad Penny
$7,000,000 Esteban Loaiza
*$500,000 Chad Billingsley
Total: $39,300,000
Bullpen (6)
$2,000,000 Takashi Saito
$1,925,000 Joe Beimel
$1,125,000 Scott Proctor
*$500,000 Jonathan Broxton
$500,000 Chan Ho Park
*$400,000 Hong-Chih Kuo
Total: $6,450,000
Starting Lineup (8)
$14,100,000 Andruw Jones
$13,000,000 Rafael Furcal
$9,000,000 Jeff Kent
$8,500,000 Nomar Garciaparra
$8,000,000 Juan Pierre
$500,000 Russell Martin
*$400,000 James Loney
*$400,000 Matt Kemp
Total: $53,900,000
Bench (6)
$875,000 Gary Bennett
$600,000 Mark Sweeney
$424,500 Andre Ethier
$391,000 Delwyn Young
$390,000 Chin-Lung Hu
$390,000 Blake DeWitt
Total: $3,071,000
Disabled List
$12,000,000 Jason Schmidt
*$400,000 Tony Abreu
*$390,000 Andy LaRoche
Total: $12,790,000
Also Paying ...
$1,000,000 Brett Tomko
$750,000 Odalis Perez
$540,000 Yhency Brazoban
$500,000 Randy Wolf
$487,500 Jason Repko
$135,225 Rudy Seanez
$100,000 Mike Lieberthal
$50,000 Ramon Martinez
Total: $3,562,725
Working total: *$113,268,725
*Rough salary estimate
ESPN BR
BP
Cube Alvarez
ESPN BR
BP
Cube Abreu
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Beimel
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Bennett
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Billingsley
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Brazoban
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Broxton
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube DeWitt
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Ethier
ESPN
BR
BP
Cube Furcal
ESPN BR BP Cube Garciaparra
ESPN BR BP Cube Hu
ESPN BR BP Cube Jones
ESPN BR BP Cube Kemp
ESPN BR BP Cube Kent
ESPN BR BP Cube Kuo
ESPN BR BP Cube Kuroda
ESPN BR BP Cube LaRoche
ESPN BR BP Cube Loaiza
ESPN BR BP Cube Loney
ESPN BR BP Cube Lowe
ESPN BR BP Cube Martin
ESPN BR BP Cube May
ESPN BR BP Cube McDonald
ESPN BR BP Cube Meloan
ESPN BR BP Cube Miller
ESPN BR BP Cube Orenduff
ESPN BR BP Cube Park
ESPN BR BP Cube Paul
ESPN BR BP Cube Penny
ESPN BR BP Cube Pierre
ESPN BR BP Cube Proctor
ESPN BR BP Cube Repko
ESPN BR BP Cube Saito
ESPN BR BP Cube Schmidt
ESPN BR BP Cube Stults
ESPN BR BP Cube Sweeney
ESPN BR BP Cube Troncoso
ESPN BR BP Cube Wade
ESPN BR BP Cube Young
ESPN BR BP Cube Alomar
ESPN BR BP Cube Alvarez
ESPN BR BP Cube Aybar
ESPN BR BP Cube Baez
ESPN BR BP Cube Bako
ESPN BR BP Cube Beltre
ESPN BR BP Cube Bradley
ESPN BR BP Cube Cabrera
ESPN BR BP Cube Carrara
ESPN BR BP Cube Carter
ESPN BR BP Cube Chen
ESPN BR BP Cube Choi
ESPN BR BP Cube Cora
ESPN BR BP Cube Crosby
ESPN BR BP Cube Cruz
ESPN BR BP Cube Dessens
ESPN BR BP Cube Dreifort
ESPN BR BP Cube Drew
ESPN BR BP Cube Encarnacion
ESPN BR BP Cube Edwards
ESPN BR BP Cube Erickson
ESPN BR BP Cube Falkenborg
ESPN BR BP Cube Finley
ESPN BR BP Cube Flores
ESPN BR BP Cube Gagne
ESPN BR BP Cube Grabowski
ESPN BR BP Cube Green
ESPN BR BP Cube Guzman
ESPN BR BP Cube Hanrahan
ESPN BR BP Cube Hernandez
ESPN BR BP Cube Hundley
ESPN BR BP Cube Ishii
ESPN BR BP Cube Izturis
ESPN BR BP Cube Jackson
ESPN BR BP Cube Karros
ESPN BR BP Cube Ketchner
ESPN BR BP Cube Ledee
ESPN BR BP Cube Lima
ESPN BR BP Cube Lo Duca
ESPN BR BP Cube Lofton
ESPN BR BP Cube T. Martin
ESPN BR BP Cube Mayne
ESPN BR BP Cube G. Mota
ESPN BR BP Cube Mueller
ESPN BR BP Cube Myrow
ESPN BR BP Cube Nakamura
ESPN BR BP Cube Navarro
ESPN BR BP Cube Nomo
ESPN BR BP Cube Osoria
ESPN BR BP Cube A. Perez
ESPN BR BP Cube O. Perez
ESPN BR BP Cube Phillips
ESPN BR BP Cube Proctor
ESPN BR BP Cube Roberts
ESPN BR BP Cube Robles
ESPN BR BP Cube Romano
ESPN BR BP Cube C. Ross
ESPN BR BP Cube D. Ross
ESPN BR BP Cube Sanchez
ESPN BR BP Cube Schmoll
ESPN BR BP Cube Sele
ESPN BR BP Cube Seo
ESPN BR BP Cube Shuey
ESPN BR BP Cube Stanley
ESPN BR BP Cube S. Stewart
ESPN BR BP Cube Thompson
ESPN BR BP Cube Thurston
ESPN BR BP Cube Valentin
ESPN BR BP Cube Venafro
ESPN BR BP Cube Ventura
ESPN BR BP Cube Weaver
ESPN BR BP Cube Werth
ESPN BR BP Cube Wilson
ESPN BR BP Cube Wunsch
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Baseball Toaster runs on some experimental software called Fairpole. It's still under development.
For more information, please visit the Fairpole blog, or read the FAQ.
I have no comment on Joe Torre, Joe Girardi, Grady Little or Ned Colletti. No one has stated anything on the record regarding any change in their current status or non-status with the Dodgers, and so there are no reasonable conclusions to draw.
Making news out off-the-record comments is a dart toss, and making news out of "he didn't return messages" is feeble journalism.
This need to guess the story before it happens is motivated purely by a desire to be read or heard, and not out of any legitimate insight into the truth of a situation. Off-the-record is worse than unreliable, but people don't care if you're wrong. Speculation is accepted around the world like MasterCard, Visa and American Express. And yet it didn't save Pedro Martinez or Mike Piazza, or save us from Brett Tomko or Juan Pierre.
It's nobody's fault. It's the way of the world these days. But I don't have to like it. There is nothing to be gained from trying to guess a story before it happens except for the reporter who gets to say, "I got it first." Why should any reader care who got it first, when the thing hasn't happened until it happens?
And in the meantime, accusations and insinuations are tossed about that may be patently unfair. But after the dust settles, and someone is inevitably wrong, who will apologize? No one. Not even me.
Bring on Game 3 of the Series, and wake me when the rest of this nonsense is over.
On a related note, although a different manager won't drastically - or maybe even slightly - change the Dodgers' fortunes next year, I do think Girardi's previous experience with an extremely young team offers a ray of hope. I realize he only had one year with the Marlins and didn't have the chance to play old losers like Garciaparra (the Marlins didn't have many old losers in '06), but there seems to be at least a chance that Girardi isn't afraid to play young players - obviously, sorely needed around here.
Stability or a lack there of.
I am quite confident that the Dodgers would be a better team with Depodesta doing his years with Logan White by his side. Tracy aside. I think he's a proven nutbag.
Build the darn team and stop needless sideways moves just to do stuff.
Now if we don't squash the story and still keep Little, he's been undermined...he'll be a lame duck.
Stupid. The whole thing. We're probably just getting used anyway.
OT-"Office" observation.
Does anyone else think that an ongoing storyline will be Jim dealing with the "New" Pam. And will he find himself becoming more and more clingy?
Man, being a Dodger fan is tougher than it should be...
And shame on you, Ken Rosenthal. Shame, shame, shame. I suppose they'll be throwing snow balls in Hades before a reporter calls out another reporter. Oh wait, I'm sorry... "columnist."
Sidenote: Are there still fans of Barry Bonds left? Among the sane, I mean. http://tinyurl.com/2lpgmj
First LAT's comment about his brush with paparazzi at the courthouse, now this. Both dead on. Honestly, find a good story, report on it, and I will read you. You don't have to try so hard and you don't have to pander to your readership.
"I'm not in favor of instant replay to overrule umpire calls, but it seems like the technology is there for umpires to know if a ball cross the strike zone or not. Fans see it clearly on TV now, assuming those little rectangular matrices are accurate."
Actually, I can't figure out which rectangle is supposed to represent the plate - the inner one or the outer one? It seems odd that the outer one would be the plate - what's the inner one then?
But I could swear that about 60% or more of the times the umpire calls strike the graphic shows the ball well outside the inner rectangle, but the commentators never say a word. (To be fair, they don't show the graphic in totally non-controversial calls, so the 60% is just 60% of supposedly close calls. Still...)
Which one is it? If the inner one, why don't the commentators ever say anything? Just not looking at it?
"Little... was given a roster of fading veterans and coddled youngsters, and the mix became combustible when the team underachieved."
Calling the youngsters "coddled" is the first I've heard of it. I thought they were forced to "break the door down" to get to the majors.
15 Are you Ken Rosenthal? :)
So Colletti makes an announcement. Then what? Olney et. al. will talk about the uncomfortable off-season the Dodgers are having what with speculation about Grady's job and all... without once having to point out the source for the speculation (Olney et. al.)
Columnists: all authority without an ounce of research and being right because, well, they've got that reputation so why wouldn't they be right? I mean, nice work if you can get it.
On a different point, some of the critiques I've read of the Office this season have been the caliber of critiques I've read on the Dodgers. The hour-long episodes = the Dodger kids. They get blamed for everything under the sun, regardless of cause or even evidence. The episodes are supposedly too bloated, even though, when you see them broken down as half-hours in syndication, you'll see they work just fine. I've seen people say Michael has become too unlikable in the hour episodes, as if he wasn't unlikable before. (The show has always pushed Michael to the edge before redeeming him only sporadically. It's always been part of the show's genius, but suddenly people are having a problem with it.)
The show, at any length, has never insisted on having a laugh at every moment, but even when it was hilarious, people have complained about the length. It really is like the Dodgers and their young players. Find a convenient villain, and then just run with it.
Game 3 of the World Series
Cal at Arizona State
New Mexico State at Hawai'i
If they make Keith sad (like he would be in real life), then we feel sorry for him and Elliot looks like the bad guy. But since Keith's mad and being a jerk, we don't feel as bad for him and Elliot looks more sympathetic.
Lame. We all knew they were never going to get married, so don't bother insulting us by having them get engaged in the first place.
Keith has always been a boring character - he never made sense as a beau for Elliott. And clearly, as the episode progressed, she wasn't over him like it was no big deal.
I admit that Keith's name-calling was sort of on-the-nose, but it's not as if you can't guess he's crying on the inside. Also, I would have been happier if they had never gotten engaged.
I actually like Keith's character, but he was better off in a smaller role being the guy JD hated then being Elliot's boyfriend. He was never appropriate in such a lead role.
The dialogue and mutual learning between Katie and Dave is great. I think Katie is my favorite character. On an unrelated note, she has a lot of "little girl" in her and really needs to grow up in some ways. But it's also kind of endearing.
I loved it when Palek pushed Carolyn over to "her side" of the bed after she rebuked his advances.
25 - TMYLM is one of the better comeback stories of the TV season. It has really come into its own.
Oscar = costumes, Stanley = urban.
And its Kit Kats Andy, Kit Kats.
Very funny.
I agree. It was iffy at first, but wow, has it ever taken off. BTW, the scene with Dave and Jeff was hilarious.
One more Scrubs thought: characters who "sabotage their own relationships" is officially cliche. Please try something else, writers.
That being said, I thought it was a great moment when Jim was reminded that Pam is her own person. But he wouldn't want it any differently.
JD staying with Kim (despite having no feelings for her) doesn't seem sustainable. I've been waiting all along for either her to break it off, or something to be revealed that makes it obvious that JD should break it off.
Most of these stories are bored columnists freaking out bored and uncertain fans. I often wonder how much of it really affects the people involved. It could very well be that the Dodger front office have told Little not to worry - that he'll be back, and that they had no hand in the speculation. Why go public? That would only validate the issue.
And Little is not a child. He knows how it goes. I actually wouldn't be shocked if he were off on his farm (or his motorcycle), blissfully unaware of all of this. And even if he has heard some of it, he's probably secure enough to ignore it unless and until someone is quoted on the record.
It's just fans who freak out. And we have no one to blame but ourselves. Just remember that all of these parasites are in the entertainment business, not the truth business. If they can keep a "controversy" going for a couple weeks, they win.
Same goes for paparazzi and those endless entertainment magazine shows. If there weren't huge demand for them, they'd disappear. For many of us, it's pointless and distasteful, but we don't have to watch if we don't want to.
I do feel bad for LAT, though, that his real-world place of businesses was invaded by the fake-world voyeurs.
I think part of the problem with Scrubs is the same as with nearly all shows that run this long. They might have run out of ideas. All of the characters have become almost completely predictable. The Janitor, Kelso, and the occasional patient are really the only wild cards left. Cox hasn't even had a good rant in a while.
And still, I'll keep watching, and be glad that I can. I guess I'm pathetic too.
Apparently, a large comet has passed through Jon's orbit.
My students are asking me why I'm so perturbed and I'm asking them why I seem so... perturbing.
Notice how I'm talking about me so much? I normally don't do that. I'm telling you, it's the weather.
The weather is reality.
I still think Kevin Youkilis could be fouling off pitches from Matt Herges at that time.
2. Earlier someone said: "I am quite confident that the Dodgers would be a better team with Depodesta doing his years with Logan White by his side."
Here's the deal - Logan White would not have stayed if DePo had stayed. Several key baseball people were set to leave, including Logan White, had McCourt not fired DePo.
Several key baseball people were set to leave, including Logan White, had McCourt not fired DePo.
I also think after next season, Colletti could be gone, and we could see Logan White as our new GM. At least, that is what I'm hoping for.
1st-10, USC39 M. Sanchez passed to S. Johnson to the left for 10 yard gain
2nd-1, USC49 S. Johnson rushed up the middle for no gain
The second play resulted in a first down.
Maybe Little AND Colletti have already been told they're gone.
Maybe that promotion to Assistant GM last week is the first step, with Kim Ng or Logan White being promoted to GM, with Torre or Girardi or LaSorda or Sonny Tufts hired as new manager.
Maybe.....
Eastern Michigan 3
Western Michigan 2
How do you pronounce that place?
I mean, it's ridiculous, isn't it? I get that baseball isn't meant to be like a book club, but aren't these characterizations of DePodesta phony on their face? How do they get such traction? DePo is a nice guy.
Doesn't it seem as if "no people skills" is just code for "didn't tell people what they wanted to hear" or "didn't return Plaschke's phone calls immediately"? These are capital crimes? Certainly, these might have helped DePo stay in the long run, but how does this become "no people skills?" In my mind, it's yet another example of how one little thing, like Matt Kemp moving a trashcan, comes to be bigger than it is meant to be.
Again, I'm not trying to dissuade you of what people told you. I'm just really losing my taste for challenging the hypocrisy that surrounds this game and how people talk about it. It just can't be beaten.
Fox Sports Net
Where do you live? Because I live in the Bay Area and I am getting it.
Scrubs: Better than last season, but aren't premieres supposed to knock you out? Also, I really don't like Elliott's character anymore.
Probably, but I still think Sanchez is better.
Is this backed up by anything other than air? What comment of mine ever is? But I can't see any other way of making sense of the issue.
And without the needless turnover of a GM X after two years and now lame duck Little.
Action for the sake of action? Never happy...grass is always greener on the other side? Frank and Ned, save it for E-Trade. This franchise needs stability more than anything.
Nicely said.
I thought Phil Knight was the mascot?
UCLA scored 41 points against Washington and the Bruins were playing the Law Firm at QB for much of the second half.
Its more like cha