Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
I've been trying to figure out how to write the first sentence of this post for 20 minutes. So we're gonna let that be the first sentence, and now we'll see if I can break though on the third sentence.
My problem is being forced to write about a topic I don't want to write about. My problem is that in the preternaturally warm morning following the most dominant Dodger victory of the season, the dominant feeling is aggravation.
I expect Matt Kemp to start in the outfield today and that he will get a majority of starts this week when the Dodgers play Pittsburgh and Atlanta. So I don't even know that there's a reason to write about him. If I wait long enough, maybe the problem of him sitting on the bench will just go away. But there's enough doubt to just wear me down.
I don't want to talk about Juan Pierre. I don't want to read about Juan Pierre. I don't want to even think about people like Joe Torre saying such nonsensical things as he did to Kevin Baxter of the Times: "I can't concern myself with power right now. We have to do more of making things happen. We're not hitting. We haven't been able to put things together."
I am perfectly willing to listen to a thoughtful discussion of how Matt Kemp hasn't drawn a walk this season and how that relates to his ability and potential. I am perfectly willing to listen to any thoughtful discussion. But to have to hear Pierre being trumpeted over Kemp as a solution to an offensive crisis - I can't. I just can't.
If you played each player 162 games, Kemp could go walkless, striking out 150 times, and still be more productive than Pierre. I just started to explain why, but I erased the sentence. Running down the reasons for the umpteenth time is running me down.
As befits a team that is 5-6 overall, 5-3 when not playing the current best team in the league and 3-5 when not playing probably the worst, there's been plenty in the good and bad columns for the Dodgers so far this year.
Sampling of the good:
Sampling of the bad:
In my opinion, the season's first two weeks turned sour not with the browbeatings in Arizona on Monday and Tuesday, but with Wednesday's and Friday's games, when the Dodgers lost the one game of the Diamondback series they should have won, then coughed up a rare lead over San Diego's Jake Peavy and wasted a five-run offensive performance. Smashing ERA kingpin Chris Young of the Padres on Saturday should have been the antidote - particularly on a snappy night when I took my kids to the ballpark to help celebrate the sixth birthday of a friend.
Instead, I'm left with the following image.
In the fourth inning Saturday, Pierre walked and stole second. With Ethier at the plate, Pierre broke for third - he had the base stolen easily. But Ethier launched a rocket toward Academy Road.
Pierre popped up from his slide to see the ball in air. He took a couple of steps back toward second base, on the theory that if the ball were caught, he'd need to go back. But in the next second, he realized that he was getting a free ride to home plate. He bowed his head and began the slow jog home.
I'm not going to begin to project what Pierre's reaction was - for all I know, he could have been doing cartwheels in his mind that Ethier had just knocked Young out of the game. I'm just talking about the image I saw, the image of a home run being hit and the basestealer looking disappointed.
It's the tension evoked by that image that taints my feelings about the Dodgers this morning, a tension between the speedy and the powerful, the scrappy and the strong. Why should there be that tension, especially when there's a uniter languishing half-used that can bring the peace?
In Saturday's game, Jones scored three runs without a hit - the most runs scored without a hit by a Dodger in 25 years, since Steve Sax in 1983. The Los Angeles Dodger record is four runs without a hit, by Jim Gilliam on September 25, 1960. (Search achieved via Baseball-Reference.com.)
So when is it time to decide that Andruw is a bust, and in fairness to JP, what a concept, it will be "Bring me the Head of AJ" time? It's memorial day for me.
Send Andruw down to AAA Vegas, great buffets in Vegas by the way Andruw, find some lingering issue that places him on the DL and some sort of rehab program. But goodness gracious, Andruw is way way below the Mendoza line, and how long can the Dodgers afford to have him in the lineup?
I had given a scenario to put yourself in Dewitt's shoes in another line of work and I used the law field as an example since I work in the field as a paralegal. I tried to equate Dewitt's experience to being a fresh green just completed the bar working at a firm eager intern/slash employee awaiting the bar results. Due to a major flu epidemic, this small law firm, has no one left to appear at the first day of a major trial except for you and ask you to sit in for the head trial attorney and your opponent is a seasoned expert attorney with many years experience and you both have to give your opening statements. (I know the firm would probably send you down to ask for a continuance based on the sickness/flu of the head counsel from the bench) but I just wanted to point out what Dewitt was up against playing at two levels above what he was at last year. So like I said before, Kudos and Atta Boys to you Blake Dewitt for the job you have done for the Dodgers so far this year.
I'm noticing that a lot of the posts in the game threads are getting more vitriolic than they used to be. (The beginning of last night's thread was particulary bumpy.) We're not just taking these dumb decisions in stride anymore, we're lashing out. It's actually a little comforting to see that Jon is not immune from the angst we are all feeling.
The source of all this is very easy to identify. After enduring years of nonsense and mismanagement, we are SO close to having the team we always wanted to have, and it's being undone by even more nonsense and mismanagement. Torre's quote to Kevin Baxter is positively Dustyesque in its stupidity, and for one, I'm getting tired of making excuses for him.
Meanwhile, we have to watch as Arizona, a team whose management certainly seems to have less trouble figuring out the right formula, is absolutely burying the division with their red-hot start. We're going to spend the rest of the summer trying to erase the lead the D-Backs have built in the first two weeks of the season.
"Aggravation" really doesn't even begin to describe it.
Lots of baseball players have guts. It's baseball. You spend 95% of the time standing around.
100% correct, but DL, the Dbacks only have a 4 game lead. It might feel like a 9 game lead, but it's still very early.
The problem is, there's an easy correlation to make:
Skinny Andruw Jones: Great hitter.
Fat Andruw Jones: Terrible hitter.
And yes, I know correlation is not causation, but just from looking at the way Jones is heaving the bat at the plate, it appears that his paunch is affecting his swing.
D-backs Record, 2nd Sunday of 2008: 9-2
Dodgers Record, 2nd Sunday of 2005: 9-2
I'm just sayin'!
So a fake announcement that Andruw has landed a gig as the spokesman for Dunkin Doughnuts would be bad too?
8
Why can't you send Andruw down to AAA for some work on his swing in games that wouldn't effect the outcome of the Dodgers season? If he's not hitting, sitting on the bench does Andruw no good, if he's not hitting, having him in the game costs the Dodgers games.
But it's not like it's the Giants or the Marlins who are off to a hot start (who we can expect to come back to the pack after a while). The Diamondbacks are very good, and of course they'll have their slumps along the way, but you know they'll be there at the end of the season with 90+ wins, in full contention for the division title. And now they've got a hell of a head start.
As Eric Enders has pointed how, this has been his modus operandi while enjoying a HOF career in Atlanta. My brother worked for the Braves and has confirmed what Eric said. A Jones will look like he hasn't a clue for long periods of time. That is just a subjective view.
Dodgers are 2 - 0 with Kent not starting.
That is all pure speculation, of course. For all I know Pierre could have been telling him how great a baseball player he is, for hitting the other way. Interesting nonetheless. I wish there was a dugout spy who posted on DT. Does anybody know the girl with the fannypack? She might be coerced.
They are almost as fun as reading a steroids related thread over at BTF.
I'm sorry, did not know that, assuming that is a union rule or something, and not just off the table because it makes Ned look bad.
So maybe Andruw has some physical ailment or vision problem, or maybe Jobu and Pedro Cerrano need to have a word with Andruw.
I never expected the booing to be based on a per at bat or per inning basis.
Are the fans who boo at games any different then the species who inhabit game threads and make negative comments on a pitch by pitch basis?
Of course, this is all written for information purposes only since there is no scenario that Jones does not play almost everyday for the Dodgers short of being hurt.
And one more thing about the weight, if he gained all this weight in the off-season, what are we to make of his 2007 season when we can suppose he was in better shape?
But they can't boo Reyes right now since he is hurt.
Even if he could be assigned to or agreed to go to Vegas, can you imagine how much worse that could make the mental aspect?
Simplistic solutions may be appealing, but they conflict with reality quite often.
Maybe actually walking a couple times last night--instead of flailing wildy at so many pitches off the plate--will be a good first step to getting back where he should be.
Giambi was coming back from health problems and they had a legitimate right to ask him to work on his swing. On the plus side, he refused and then caught fire after just about everyone had written him off including me due to the steroid allegations and the other health issues he was dealing with.
That is another reason why I've yet to panic on A Jones. I have done my chicken little act in the past and have been burned. Easier to just have some patience and see what happens but I understand that everyone wants to vent about him, because he is killing the offense.
Loving DeWitt. He could go 0-40 and it wouldn't change the fact he did the job we asked of him when we needed him. And how about the defense? I sure don't see any stone hands, but I do see one heck of an arm.
I am going to posit that Jones is simply pressing right now, new team, new contract, bad last season (by his standards).
All that said, I stand by my comment last night that there is something "off" with the Dodgers, though I can't put my finger on it.
Theory on why Torre is playing Pierre over Kemp: Torre is a master of playing the media. He knows that playing Ethier over Pierre causes a ruckus, and he wants to avoid that. So he plays Pierre over Kemp while giving Ethier, a player he clearly has an affinity for, a chance to earn the starting job. While there were some who felt (wrongly) that Pierre was a better option than Ethier, no one in their right mind would suggest that Pierre is better than Kemp. Eventually the demand for Kemp to play becomes great, and as long as Ethier keeps putting up good numbers, no one bats an eye when Pierre is benched in May as the Dodgers look to dump his salary.
Today: "TORRE IS new on the job, so trying to help, I told him he's got it all wrong so far, playing Pierre when Matt Kemp should be in the lineup every game." T.J. Simers
It's all going to plan. No one is questioning whether Pierre should play ahead of Ethier anymore. Ethier is now, at least in the minds of the media, a starter. The question is now whether Matt Kemp, who is recognized as a raw but exceptional talent, should play over Pierre.
Can we give Torre some time? Can we remember that it's April? Can we remember that the season is a marathon? And before we frak out about the D-Backs, can we remember that there is a wild card? Can we NOT do the Dodgers Thoughts-commenters thing and freak out and vilify/idolize one guy right out of the gate?
Beyond that:
1) No matter what happens, it's just a game, it's just baseball. Only one part of my daily life.
2) I apologize for declaring the Dbacks winners of the NL West back on Tuesday
3) I tend to get more upset on days when the Dodgers start Pierre over Kemp.
4) Seeing how Jon is upset over the negativity of late (deserved or no), I'll end my "Pierre over Kemp" boycott and just enjoy the ride. because...
5) No matter what, the Dodgers are my baseball team and through thick and thin, I stick with them.
NY Post reported Sunday that two workers approached a construction manager with what they thought was the location of the jersey. After digging a two-foot by three-foot hole, the jersey was found.
"They absolutely pinpointed that if it was in the ground, that's where it was," Yankees spokeswoman Alice McGillion told the newspaper.
Initially the Yankees denied the jersey was ever buried in the footings of the new stadium. But clearly the Yankees brass is happier now with the possibility of a curse gone.
"I hope his co-workers kick the [expletive] out of him," Yankees co-chairperson Hal Steinbrenner said.
http://tinyurl.com/46xs8z
By reading your posts, a lot of you obviously live in California. You certainly must recall the situation a couple years ago with the NFL Chargers. Drew Brees was playing brilliantly. Drew Brees was a qb of the future, a guy you could win a ton of games with for the next decade. Drew Brees was allowed to walk away because a kid on the bench had a multi-million dollar contract and "needed" to play. Forget that Brees had just taken them to the playoffs. Forget that Phillip Rivers had done exactly zero at that point in his career. The fact was, they were in to Rivers for the next five years for a lot of money, and they weren't going to let that money rot in order to allow an arguably better player to play instead. Goodbye Brees, hello unknown.
McCourt and Colletti-ot seem to be of a similiar mindset- biggest contract plays, period. Screw whether that happens to be the best player. Screw whether that means losing games because your most talented guys aren't on the field. They have to justify their spending, so Pierre and Jones and Loaiza and Nomar, etc., etc. get trotted out day after day. And Torre, being the good company man he is, is reduced to saying inane things to the press to try and justify management's position. That quote is arguably the most incredibly stupid sentence to ever leave a MLB manager's mouth, and Torre is not a stupid man. Until Frank McCourt concerns himself with fielding his best team day in and day out, and trying to win every time his team takes the field, this isn't going to change. Leave it up to Colletti-ot, and Pierre and Jones will be out there every day even if they aren't hitting their respective weight (and there truly was no pun intended there).
As far as Jones goes, my biggest concern is what Simers' reported. If Jones in fact has the "I don't care" attitude that Simers' reported, he then is going to become a clubhouse cancer. Guys like Ethier, Loney, Martin, Kemp, Bills, etc are ready and willing to run through a brick wall to win a game. Now they have among them a "veteran leader" who is hitting .100 while making 18 mil/year and saying he doesn't care what anyone thinks. That's beautiful. God, where is Kirk Gibson for attitude adjustments when you need him?
I think we give Torre this week to prove himself. If the lineups make sense, then we can at least pretend he was allowing Pierre to play himself out of the lineup.
That said, it seems like a weird way of going about business. Why not just make the right decision, be comfortable knowing you have the rings to back it up, and not give up possible losses for the sake of the long-term?
More and more I'm thinking Torre just really does believe that Pierre helps the team.
And no, the season is not a marathon if one is implying that these games mean less than any games in the future.
.936
.629
.487
.936
.770
.582
So there are downs like now, but also ups, I'm sure when he's one of the best players in baseball.
--For some reason, I can't get too worried about Andruw Jones. Yes, he's been horrible beyond belief this season so far, but he will give us 30 HRs. And I never make "fat player" jokes. David Ortiz is fat. Prince Fielder is fat. Olmedo Saenz is fat, but that didn't bother us in '05 and '06. Or '04.
--Pierre starting over Kemp is an organizational psychosis, and I still see articles around the MLB press saying that it's a good idea. I don't know if it's a good thing or not that TJ Simers is on our side, but I do know that we're right, and that Matt Kemp is every bit the hitter that Mark Reynolds is, and a lot more talented when it comes to the other tools.
There is ZERO chemistry between him and Bills.
As for his weight, I'm no one to complain about a fat player. I love the idea of a 300 pound CF winning the gold glove. Dine on, you wealthy diamond.
That, in a nutshell, is the situation. Torre does not appreciate the two most basic functions hitters are supposed to perform. Why do you think it took $190M payroll for him to compete with the Yankees? Is that because he's a good manager?
Skinny Andruw Jones: Great hitter.
Fat Andruw Jones: Terrible hitter.
It's not an easy correlation to make if you consider the fact that Jones was reportedly at the lowest weight of his career last year and put up his worst numbers yet.
I will say your "trip to the wood-chipper" comment made me crack up. Visions of Fargo coming back to me there...
I'm glad I missed last night's in-game discussion. I watched the game in the MLBTV archives late last night, enjoying most of it in my own solitary way.
This is totally grasping at any silver lining I can, but didn't it at least look like Jones had better at bats last night, after the first one? At least he wasn't swinging at the pitches they were making him chase earlier, taking walks is better than nothing. He's been looking awful, swinging at pitches out of the zone, so at least in those at bats he seemed a little more patient. Again, it may be just trying to grab on to anything with him but one step at a time I guess.
Happy Two Weeks Into a 162 Game Season, everyone!
I don't understand (or maybe, I just don't agree with) the logic that 30 HRs nullify any other stats a player can put up.
Furcal, SS
Pierre, LF
Ethier, RF
Kent, 2B
Loney, 1B
Martin, C
Jones, CF
DeWitt, 3B
Billingsley, P
Furcal, SS
Pierre, LF
Ethier, RF
Kent, 2B
Loney, 1B
Martin, C
Jones, CF
DeWitt, 3B
Billingsley, P
WHERE IS KEMP?!?!?!? This is flat out ridiculous now.
Remember the NL West, and remember this:
2007- Arizona wins the division a 0.5 game over Colorado, San Diego finishes 1.5 game back and misses the playoffs.
In a division as tight, and as talented, as this, we don't have the wiggle room to allow for Torre to be making easily fixable mistakes, and we don't have the overwhelming talent to make up for any deficiencies in the offense.
We really need for everything to be done right this season, and it's frustrating when we can already essentially see games being lost while one of our best players sits on the bench.
At least Silverwidow's fear of Gary Bennett starting were unrealized. {looking on bright side.}
Okay, let's try to focus on the positives, let's get a win, let's get Matt Kemp the rest of the week or it'll be visions of wood-chippers for the lot of us.
Bison doesn't deserve this treatment.
It's actually slightly more distrubing to me that Ethier has complete immunity now. I expected Pierre to start at least 120 games so seeing his name in the lineup isn't too bothersome.
But, it's true, HR's are "rally killers." ;-)
---
Hey, my Sunday soccer team is 2-0 to start the season after a 6-zip win today! If that doesn't cheer you, don't know what will!
1. The. 2. Masters.
Zach Duke - LHP
Matt Morris - RHP
Paul Maholm - LHP
If Kemp doesn't play two out of three, there is a MAJOR PROBLEM.
Hmmm JP's agent calls Ned, not the media, the GM for the team. I guess that's complaining in your book, I call it business.
then again, i tend to be an optimist.
Really, the agent is just doing his job. It's Ned and/or Torre's fault for caving to that, if that's even the reason for their amazing levels of idiocy lately.
I figure that the Dodgers will continue the nonsense with Kemp for the rest of the season, and then trade him in the off-season.
Interesting that ever since Torre said last week that Kemp would play "most of the time," Pierre has played most of the time.
A small suggestion, Joe---put him in the lineup every day and let him show you and everyone else just how good he is.
It's been mentioned before that the team could be showcasing Pierre. Unlikely. He's been around way more than long enough for other teams to assess his skills, such as they are. They know what they would/wouldn't be getting.
Another explanation--worse if so--is that Ned (or even Frank) is telling Joe to play JP, "give him a shot at working through his slump and being the player he's always been, so he can help the team."
We assume here that Joe has the cred to win any lineup contest with Ned. But Ned is still GM. If Ned interfered much, I doubt Joe would put up with it. But Joe's job has a political content, so this early in the season and into his three-year Dodger contract, I could see Joe kind of going along, not rocking the boat much for a while while he gets a better feel. His inane comments--and actions--could reflect the team political dimenson. But that kind of a situation won't/can't last long, if it's the case.
Also, it's probably not realistic to expect Torre, age 67 and certified old-schooler, to embrace modern stastical analysis to the degree he probably should, even less to act quickly on conclusions readily available through it.
Pierre: 8
Kemp: 5
Torre said Pierre would start the season as a bench player pinch-hitting, pinch-running and being available to spell a starter
Pierre sulking in the corner, another nice image but not true. Pierre sits about 99 percent of the time in the far corner of the dugout near the camera well, before he was benched, after he was benched and in between.
Nobody that I have read or hear of says that JP is anything but a good team mate, and a good club house guy. Making stuff up because you don't like his game is pretty amazing, and oh by the way, JP plays the game the same way he has for years and years. Be mad at Ned all you want for signing JP, but JP does not have Barry Bonds disease.
I agree. We don't need to invent reasons for Juan Pierre to not be playing. We have plenty already.
I think DeWitt has done a great job too under the circumstances. Despite his key hit last night, and it maybe was the key hit of the game, I'd like to think Nomar will give us more offensive production. At least I hope he does. Like Toy Cannon is implying, the defense may be a problem once Nomar returns.
If DeWitt goes back down when Nomar returns, we have no one to spell Nomar defensively in the late innings. Hu can't play both 2nd and 3rd at the same time. It seems that the superfluous one is Sweeney. We will have two people who can play first behind Loney. He (Sweeney)should really be unnecessary once LaRoche returns.
I'll just sit here and cry.
I agree with 59 If Greg Maddux, at this point in his career, is considered a "tough righty" Matt Kemp is never going to see the line-up.
Also, it seems unnecessary to "showcase" Pierre for a trade. As someone said above - everyone knows what Pierre can do
Whatever Torre has in mind is a mystery to me.
i was making no connections to where he sat or anything else as being a negative. if any were made, it was unintentional, and i did not know that jp regularly sat there.
:)
You are supppose to be the calm person here.
You start a column called "bring the peace" and there nothing but gasoline. You have your choir group here.
My family and I are going to the beach today, send me your email address and I will send you some pictures of the beach, the kids having fun, and the the women.
Every year I want the Dodgers to win 162 and the Gaints to lose 162. The Dodgers look good for about 85.
I still like your work.
But it's not working. I'm still disgusted.
You just made me laugh during a very quiet lecture. Everyone stared. I wanted to expalin, but I don't think they'd get how savage Jason Repko can be.
I wonder how long it takes before Matt's frustration boils over and he takes the route Loney took last year and asks to be traded. It wouldn't surprise me, the same way I wasn't surprised when Loney did last year.
Torre's mindset changed. He gave Pierre a shot. I think now, Kemp will start against southpaws, Pierre will start against right-handers. So we have a platoon.
However, I also think if and when Kemp gets hot and shows Torre how good he is, he will win back the starting job. Torre is still getting to know his team here - as well as dealing with the realities of several huge contracts.
No problem. I just hope people can separate the ball player JP from the person JP. From what I've read JP is a pretty darn nice guy/ good team mate and all that, and he does play the game the way he's always played the game.
I also have a bias as JP's from my home town, and went to the same high school, of course I went there in the Jurassic period of history, JP a lot more recently.
The whole idea that an organization needs positive reinforcement between its members is a fallacy. The most successful organizations run on the competitiveness and animosity of its members towards eachother. In a game like baseball particularly, "We lack teamwork" is just code for management being inept at dealing with the externalities of that competition.
I know everybody thinks they're smarter and know more about baseball than Joe Torre, who, by the way, owns four World Series rings, but to jump all over his decision making this early in the season seems rather silly. I mean, I'd rather Kemp started too, but saying that it's "wearing me down" sounds a bit over dramatic, no?
Actually, in this case, we all are smarter than Joe torre. Matt Kemp is a better baseball player than juan Pierre in every category of the game except for baserunning. It is an injustice to Kemp, the team, and the fans that he is now relegated as thr 4th outfielder. As for the "overly dramatic" responses, we all know how close this division will be at the end. Playing Juan Pierre for a substantial amount of time over a far superior player could be the difference between making the playoffs and sitting at home watching inferior teams play. It's mind-numbing, frustrating, and unfair to all parties involved. Juan Pierre gets villified, Kemp gets mistreated, and the fans are seeing a subpar team put on the field.
One other note about JP, Maddux as I recall has a very good move, so SB' are not very likely today-one of JP'S strengths are SB's, so his value today is even less than say it was Friday night.....Dave Stewart was on the radio in Oakland last night, wish it would have been a call in so I would have told him to call the Dodgers....Best thing that could happen especially given Andru Jones situation/contract, would be to trade JP for the best possible outfield prospect hope they would be ready in 2-3 years and once Jones goes there is someone with some power who can replace Jones.
Here's some impossible trivia: What's the least amount of syllables in a starting lineup ever?
So either Kemp is really in the doghouse due to attitude (which I see no evidence of) or I know nothing about baseball or torre knows nothing about baseball or Torre has been told he HAS to play Pierre and afterall who questions Torre (Simers) he isn't Grady for petes sake or Pierre needs to play because a few teams are scouting him right now.
This, of course, isn't directed at you, Canuck!
I'm not mad, though, or even frustrated, because the season is still way too early for that. This too will pass.
Predictable?
Really, I want to be wrong. But Ned's fixation on veterans hasn't been that productive. I'm surprised Logan White doesn't just quit out of boredom.
Your comment raises a good point.
The question we're focusing on: "Why is Pierre starting over Kemp?"
A separate yet also worthwhile question: "Why is Jones starting over Kemp?"
Tiger just needs the putter to work.
Jones makes 17.7 million dollars more than Kemp.
so when i look at today's lineup, and see yet again that kemp isn't deemed better than pierre, i go through an internal meltdown. my brain, which happens to know more about baseball than brakes, knows something is amiss, something that isn't baseball-related. but my brain fights with my heart, which instinctively wants to say 'trust torre, the guy is an expert, even with the nose hairs.'
well, today, i am rising above my trust problem. i am saying, categorically, that the expert - torre - is an idiot. kemp is better than pierre and starting pierre in a game that counts (yup, they count in april, i just looked it up) is an affront to dodger fans everywhere, particularly those paying for tickets today. joe, frank, etc... shame on all of you.
From this day forward, whenever Juan Pierre is in the lineup instead of Matt Kemp, I will root passionately for the Dodgers to lose. (Not that they'll need my help to lose.) No team this incompetent, this stubborn, this aggressively self-defeating, deserves to have a single fan left. I will not be party to the silent acceptance of idiocy.
I feel like it's 1789, and I can only hope the Bastille is about to be stormed.
word, mon frere.
No, that seat's not taken.
Still, at least he's not Tracy.
At least, I remember the two dudes yelling "Go Isreal" in front of me.
If Jones does start hitting soon, it will be impossible to know whether we'd have won more games for the season by starting Kemp sooner and letting him play his way out, or not. (I.e. playing Kemp and Pierre now might mean sitting Jones for half the season and having him be horrible for all the games he does play. Letting him play himself in should result in an Ethier-Jones-Kemp lineup as originally planned for most of the season.)
But it's awfully frustrating and sure does seem moronic in the short term.
>> One day after being told he would be replaced in his next scheduled start Tuesday night by Hong-Chih Kuo, Dodgers right-hander Esteban Loaiza expressed dissatisfaction Saturday with the way he has been handled this season. <<
Torre on Furcal/Pierre at the top of the lineup:
## "If we can get a couple of speed guys to get on base and cause some distractions and some movement, we might be able to manufacture some runs." ##
http://www.presstelegram.com/sports/ci_8907747
Today's boring historical anecdote!
I'm thinking of converting. What do I get out of Catholicism, at best an old Irish guy telling jokes about golf. Is there an online form for conversion?
Hey, speaking of MS's crummy Silverlight player for MLBTV, does anyone using it on the Mac have trouble pausing it? Basically pause doesn't work at all for me (using FF for the Mac.)
Dellucci with an RBI single!
7-1 Tribe.
93
94
93
93
94
93
But as I've pointed out for over a year, he has a flaw in his swing that keeps him from reaching his potential. His first move is consistently to move his weight away from the plate. Even his hips pull back slightly with every pitch. He's so strong that even doing this he can hit it out to right (like he did last night). But maybe, just maybe, they are working with him on this and sitting him has more to do with training a rookie to do right. Perhaps it is even punishment for not following direction on pitch selection (or something else). Pierre got his message on opening day. Perhaps Kemp gets his in this opening 10 days and both will be better off come mid summer. Again, I agree, this is the season and you need to play your best players. But you also have to train your kids and especially kids with potential like Kemp's. Just a thought. Let the flaming begin, I'll be watching the Masters.
This is the leader in the clubhouse for the title of the next Joe Torre biography.
These are accepted principles of baseball analysis. (Well, accepted by most, I guess.) We'll just have to agree to disagree.
And so I just want them to lose, because as long as they win in spite of Pierre, this is just going to continue. Kemp is going to continue getting buried at the expense of his development and confidence, and this smug Plaschkeesque anti-Moneyball grit-and-hustle crowd is just going to continue thinking that slugging under .300 is canceled out by creating "havoc" on the basepaths.
I can't root for this team anymore, not as long as this is going on. It's silly to be this caught up in the emotions of it, but it's silly to follow grown men playing athletic events for millions of dollars to begin with, so when in Rome....
http://garciapierra.blogspot.com/
142 - no idea how that works; I usually use my wife's setup for that, but since we moved she hasn't had a turntable hooked up to anything.
http://tinyurl.com/3rad92
Maddux balked.
Pierre lined out to second
Ethier flied out to center
Kent grounded out to pitcher
<pats self on back>
Actually, it was Steve of the former Fire Jim Tracy who came up with it, but I extended it to what I hope is a more general case.
They didn't, and that's fine. But if you aren't going to trade him, AT LEAST PLAY HIM. He's the most talented player on the field when he plays; the guy hits line drives like Vlad.
What is happening absolutely boggles the mind and reminds me why the Dodgers have bricked the past twenty years.
Jones walked again -- maybe he is starting to lay off those sliders out of the zone -- I say so hopefully.
Which won't endear him to Management.
Joe's job can be grouped into two categories of decisions: the major category and the minor category.
The major category is he has to play the best players he has got to win as many games as possible.
The minor category is dealing with the costs that stem from his major decision. These include unhappy players, unhappy boss, making his boss and owner look bad and generally dealing with the headaches of being the focus of the media and the public. Although, part of his job is also to deal with these things, its clearly not as important as his major category of decisions.
Here, it is important to note that I believe the minor category does not necessarily affect the major category. Unhappy players do not necessarily perform worse.
Joe is getting paid 4 million dollars. Playing Kemp and Pierre is an easy decision. He named Kemp the starter, and has all but said Kemp is a better player than Pierre. The problem is that in trying to justify his pay, he is trying to deal with the minor problem and forgot that these concerns are secondary to the primary responsiblity of his job.
There is no way a guy who has seen baseball as much as him thinks Pierre is better than Kemp. Those quotes in the media are part of his effort to keep his players happy and cover the behinds of his superiors. That is why he is different than Grady, and why this is even more frustrating. On the second day of this season, Torre tried to do too much, he overthought himself, and now all us fans are suffering from his reluctance to "make the easy pass" as they say in soccer.
The radar gun on TV is slow (Gameday is about 3 MPH faster).
Did Vin Scully really just say "Gooch and Kooz"? {titter}
My goodness I thought I would never utter such a thought, but, bitter as it is JP is playing better than Jones, if defense is not considered.
While it is true that the season is young, the sad thing is that a game lost to poor team management in April counts as much as a game in August/September. Losses, especially within ones own division, will be very hard to makeup since the 2008 race was already going to be a close affair.
It will get worse when Nomar returns. There will then be three automatic outs (Jones, JP, Nomar) on an already weak hitting team. This assumes, of course, that Martin figures out his problem.
Patience is not all it is cracked up to be, especially when insanity is running rampant in the clubhouse.
May we all have an interesting season.
"To talk of many things:
Of shoes--and ships--and sealing-wax--
Of cabbages--and kings--
And why the sea is boiling hot--
And whether pigs have wings."
1. Kemp
2. Ethier
3. Jones
4. Pierre
Torre's Outfielder Depth Chart:
1. Ethier
2. Jones
3. Pierre
4. Kemp
If this were Mastermind, Torre would have none of the pegs in the correct position.
Didn't Jake Peavy play for the Padres?
Breaker breaker we've got a Rule 1 violation, over.
Maybe his agent is Boras--I forget.
I'm feeling better and have a choice, listening to Vin.
Even Jose Lima thinks Nick Swisher has gone overboard.
As Vin just said, the Wolves are out...you think?
If given the opportunity, which Free Agent Center Fielder will you look to go after for 2009?
Yet, they lead the AL West. Or at least, did.
At least, part of your statement is right.
a) The facts that the Giants, who were more intimate with the details of his medical situation than anybody, didn't offer him a deal should have been a Clue.
b) He had missed significant time due to injury in his walk year.
c) When he was pitching, his velocity was down, especially toward the end of the year.
The beauty of the early season.
I believe something very like this explains the Dodgers playing Pierre and acquiring Jones instead of Kemp and Ethier.
"shoulder damage right after we signed him"
And how did he injure said shoulder? signing the contract? It would seem as though there is no reason to believe that he did not come to the Dodgers as damaged goods (I can recall scouts commenting on his lack of velocity from the beginning of spring training). You can argue that Ned had no way of knowing this ..... well I suppose you could agrue anything that you'd like ...... ok so I think that you could make a better case that Ned had no way of knowing this.
So did Torre just decide that Chad is a better hitting option than anyone on the bench?
Not to mention A-Rod and the $200 million payroll.
Way to go my man Ethier!
I still would have left him in.
For every swing and a miss Andruw takes, a sip of your favorite adult beverage, while you can still afford it.
Us: Pierre fouled off four straight ball fours before getting a lucky single. Bad at-bat.
other candidates:
-- trading pedro (i'd argue it wasn't; there were reasons for that trade. bad reasons, but reasons.)
-- sid fernandez
-- brock over garvey?
letting rick monday in a broadcast booth?
Also, none of us want Pierre starting, but does calling him a "dummy" and a "dork" add anything to the conversation?
Btw, Chad was pulled because he was tired, had hit 90 pitches because of all the fouled balls and strikeouts and because it's really flippin' hot out there. More importantly is why can't the Dodgers score any runs today? (Or will they, I should say.)
Its going to take a while to forget that jem.
Does this blog need to be moderated full-time, is that what it's come to?
who is?
Beer and increased taxes on it transcends politics....but OK you have a point. No more.
Joe Torre is turning people into werewolves.
Pierre over Kemp?...check.
Horrid managerial decision?...check.
Jones doing his thing?...check.
The good hitters looking bad?...check.
Billingsley on the hook for the L after a good outing?...check.
I honestly can't think of a single good thing that has happened so far.
Rules 6,7, and 8 get violated in every thread.
trading pedro
trading piazza
pitching to jack clark
depending how long kemp sits, i'm not sure i've seen anything that beats juan pierre playing in front of kemp...
great call. that slipped my peanut-like mind
When you're not scoring runs, you need to manufacture them. Power won't help.
This could become a game that Torre loses only from an obvious mis-understanding of baseball fundementals, and that would be very disquieting, to say the least.
you essentially just violated rule 9, essentially.
Wow, I thought they just doubled DeWitt up at second.
god, it's possible that in less than two weeks in LA torre is responsible for two of the top five dumb things in LA dodger history: benching kemp in favor of juan and uttering, in public, the phrase "not concerned" with power.
Also: God, I love DeWitt.
it's not your fault, but this team doesn't need to be jinxed
great point about driefort. his deal did hurt us for years. but i'd argue that was a bad idea initially that turned into a horrible/rancid/team killing move over time. overpaying, in general, doesn't bum me out as much as lack of effort. i'd say kemp gathering splinters is a sign that our management has its head up its rear.
Rabble rabble rabble rabble rabble
Ethier, Kemp, and D Young.
but we don't care about power around here
Nice play by DeWitt there!
Well, at least the pitching was good today.
But I am happy enough that we outpitched, and out defended the Padres, although Green was good.
We just out-Pierred them. And that is a Legendary thing that has huge weight.
Btw, how nice is it to have good defense again? With Loney and DeWitt manning the corners and Furcal playing excellent at short, and Jones being a huge upgrade over Pierre in center even if he's lost a step... it's a nice change from last year, even if we're in a bit of a slow start.
BIg hit by Loney!! Cmon Russ!
Russell, meanwhile, has been robbed all day.
Nevermind.
If Torre doesn't play Kemp tommorow he shouldn't be a manager.
And Russell hit the ball well all day with NADA to show for it. I really thought that was gonna get out.
Sigh.
I think that I need to stop watching when Pierre is the starter.
It's just baseball. It's just baseball. It's just baseball...
Heck, at this point, I kind of miss Russell.
Weeeeee!!!!!!
You know which mistake.
Sudden death playoff.
But on the bright side, there are some funny pics of Andy LaRoche yesterday from Jon SooHoo on Dodgers.com.
All I wanted to tell McCourt was fire Joe Torre and Coletti immediately because in this division, even if they do things right from now on, they will miss the play-offs by a half game. I truly would like to believe that they are trying to showcase JP, but I firmly believe if he started doing well by his definition (.300 BA and many SB and CS) the stooges might lose focus and trade Kemp instead.
I do not think there is any chance of them trading Kemp. Which shows that they really value him, but for some reason think he is going to get better by not playing.
Like I said earlier, the Dodgers need to sweep the Pirates, to get some confidence back, never mind the standings.
431 Thank you for being rational and saying something positive. Sincerely.
I was inspired by the pinch-running.
Meloan?
Pinango?
Mike Myers?
Greg Jones? (who had a good spring and has been good in Vegas so far, though that could all be a mirage)
Most likely it wouldn't yet be you-know-who or McDonald...
Who else?
I am guessing Myers.
Chicks dig the long ball. And money.
Don't worry, we can always bring him back. Much to everyone's delight.
Messrs. Kuo, Dessens, Tomko, Beimel, and Carrara with the honors.
The whole ceremony and them sitting down and chatting in this dumb room.
Ethier has started every game this season so I'm expecting Torre to start Pierre/Jones/Kemp against the lefty tomorrow. Of course, I expected that a couple of days ago. :-)
I am expecting a more "Even though we are all frustrated, be civil and don't keep repeating the same thing. We all know Pierre should not be starting" NPUT.
That's more or less what I meant. Whatever it is, it's apparently going to be rather long.
Have you seen any clips of the Yamma Pit?
Just photos. From what I read, the columnists didn't much care for the "warning track".
It would have been cooler if you had a dream where you were Don Frye's moustache.
That's Nate's dream.
Maybe he relied on Don Mattingly more than we thought.
That baby would be the awesomeness that is Don Frye.
I am, but I won't!
We're still 0.5 games ahead of the Giants.
Even Brighter:
We have the 2nd best Pythagorean Record in our division.
1. I read somewhere that in a flat out sprint Kemp is faster than Pierre (I think Pierre steals more due to a better jump)
2. We all know that if it came down to a collision at home for the tying run The Bison can run over any catcher in the league, as proven in Ron Stilanovich's "Hardall Made Easy" video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kH4KP6uqtMg
We have the 2nd best Pythagorean Record in our division.
Seriously?
--
I've already assumed we'll finish 83-79, i.e. not in the playoffs, so with that in mind, I was really impressed with Billingsley's start today. All those strikeouts were very neat to see again, and even better, they helped my fantasy team!
I'd be upset about this loss except the man who drove in the run is Macanulty and he's from my hometown of Oxnard! He even went to the same high school my sister goes to.
Las Vegas Top 1st
Nomar Garciaparra grounds into double play
Las Vegas Top 3rd
Nomar Garciaparra lines out to third baseman Jeff Baisley.
Las Vegas Top 6th
Nomar Garciaparra grounds out
Las Vegas Top 8th
Nomar Garciaparra pops into double play
So far after two games: 0 for 7.
http://tinyurl.com/3m55sy
Speed off the bench is good. Repeat. Power in the lineup, speed off the bench. Repeat until lungs are sore, mouth is dry, patience exhausted.
Not a awful lot of power in any of those ab's.
I was upset turning on the t.v. & seeing a 1-0 loss from our boys in blue but I thought to my self, 1-0 Billingsley pitching not to shabby, it's still a very young season, I'm just happy our boy Billz did a REALLY GOOD job against sir Maddux.
I am not sure they feel comfortable playing Hu at third.
I was actually hoping to see Hu run for Loney for a couple of reasons. One, if the Dodgers tie the game he was coming in to play 2nd base with Kent moving to 1st. And two, if Martin walks I wanted to see Kemp pinch hit for Jones. Okay, so Torre probably would not have pinch hit for Andruw. But he once dropped A-Rod to 8th so who knows. :-)
Torre's not concerned about power right now.
GO CHAN HO!
*not counting Young (2B).
http://xkcd.com/386/
If we're not allowed or if it is in poor taste to do the gab bit, maybe that ought to be spelled out somewhere?
dang, that pretty much wipes out every post i've ever done here.
DT is lucky to have folks like you and I around.
It's a good problem to have.
It's like that old line: Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference.
I've been trying to apply that to my life. There are a few things that I simply can't find serenity for, but most are Rule 5 violations, so I do little things to change them while I can.
Sports is something I truly enjoy on a variety of levels, but there are simply too many things more important than these games in my life for me to let it control me. Really, just trying to go zen.
I hear the depressing voice of Joe Morgan, but it will still be more exciting than Dodgers in shackles trying to play.
Now its 7-4 Sox! Viva action. Actually, Kuroda is probably better than Dice-K.
Unfair indeed. I'm a veritable Renaissance man.
I calculate MacDonald and Kershaw start Monday and Tuesday.
Suns schedule no doubt intended to cheer us up on Tax Day.
Just looking at the their past five games and assuming a five-man rotation you may be a very lucky man. :-) It appears to be McDonald's turn on Tuesday and Kershaw's turn on Wednesday.
Wednesday: James McDonald (won 4-1)
Thursday: Clayton Kershaw (lost 2-0)
Friday: postponed
Saturday Doubleheader: 1st game: Marlon Arias, 2nd game: Jesus Castillo
Sunday: Mario Alvarez
Tuesday: James McDonald
Wednesday: Clayton Kershaw
I calculate MacDonald and Kershaw start Monday and Tuesday.
Oooops! You're right. I thought Monday was an off day.
Has anyone ever seen that movie "The King and Me"? I hear it's a classic.
---
I've seen it on stage with amateur nouns. I'd love to see it with proper pro nouns. :-) (ducking...)
Actually I forgot how early it is on the West coast. He might actually be doing something mildly important.
The supposition that Matt Kemp is more deserving of a regular outfield spot over Pierre simply holds no weight in my mind as he has not proved that he deserves it. Particularly in the mind of Joe Torre who fully understands the sure-thing aspect of Pierre. In addition, Pierre is in the lineup to stay, albeit in left, and will be in the number two spot in the lineup for the remainder of the season. Andruw Jones fate is less clear, in my mind. I suspect that at the end of April if this miasma continues he will be DL'd to the minors and THEN you will see Kemp play consistently. OR there will have to be a platoon with Eithier, which Joe will not do as Eithier is Joe's Paul O'Neil here in LA.
On another note, PLEASE return Loney to the three hole forever and for the rest of his life. He deserves that hole and put Eithier five where he belongs sandwiching Jeff.
All of this nonsense in the outfield was the continuing and haunting vision of a mad GM.
Bring me the head of Brian Cashman.
Dodger Tony
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.