
|
Growin' Up
2008-05-11 11:29
Today's lineup: Juan Pierre, LF (30) * * * Via Blue Heaven and Gaslamp Ball, Paul DePodesta has started a blog: It Might Be Dangerous... You Go First. I began thinking about hosting a blog about a year ago, and back in January I took the first big step by starting an internal blog for employees of the Padres. The idea all along was to someday create an external blog to engage in a direct dialogue with our fans. Well, given the events of the past few weeks, that "someday" is now. * * *
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TtA1jqIJJDw
Not bad for such a horrible communicator.
Well, no one ever questioned Bloggle Boy's ability to communicate via computer...
I blame the Indiana Jones trailer I saw last night.
I'm worried about that film because in the trailer, Indiana Jones describes a "crystal skull, made out of solid gold."
How can something crystal be also made of gold?
With two exceptions every starter is half my age or younger.
Has anybody seen the new David Mamet movie? Do you have to care about these newfangled fighting games to like it?
I will go back to working on the NY Times crossword puzzle.
Anyway I'll be back around 1ish gonna focus on the lakers for about half an hour first.
I'm so glad they brought back Karen Allen, and didn't bring back Kate Capshaw.
One of my colleagues said he used to be called "Short Round" as a kid, which he took in a positive way though it seems like it might be insulting.
Stupid naps. Never long enough.
I knew a Short Round also. I think every school district had one when we were growing up.
Take that Bissinger!
Is Young so bad that Joe couldn't figure a way to play him at second until today?
Somewhere in the Times or Dodger web site it states that Dodgers continue to be at least open to a trade for a third baseman.
They'll probably lose every game in Utah, but they should pull out the series in 7 games.
C Martin (backup Navarro)
1B Loney
2B Kent
SS Hu
3B LaRoche
OF Kemp
OF Werth
OF Bradley? Repko? D Young?
P Penny/Lowe/Bills/Jackson/McDonald or Kershaw
Of course with the dead guy we would have never had Furcal, Saito, and Ethier. But on the other hand, we would have never had Tomko, Hendrickson, Lugo, Jones, Schmidt, Pierre, Baez, Gonzo, or Bennett either.
To C.C., or not to C.C.?
Thoughts?
This is a team that could really use Barry Bonds. Fickle relief pitchers, they went from the worse relief staff in baseball to one of the best in one winter.
No doubt that's the explanation the writers of the film had in mind. ;)
He's clearly on top of his game when he can pick up Gerald Laird like he did the other day without injuring something.
And another thing! Why are they still called the Jazz? Is there a big bebop tradition in Salt Lake? Did Coltrane play there once? (Yeah, I know, really old rant, I'm pulling them out from my anti-Jazz files today.) Can't they just trade nicknames with the current New Orleans team?
What a bogus call by the refs. Is the girls basketball?
Coming from a LAKER fan that is just a silly question.
The jazz fans are the most classless, and un knowledgable group of buffoons out there..
Snakes losing again.
Yeah, I really don't mind them incessantly booing Kobe, I mean, whatever, but booing Fisher everytime he comes in, every time he has the ball? Just classless.
That ejection of Turiaf was a joke. Was it because he said something afterwards? If it was for the foul itself, that's ludicrous.
Things are looking up!
Flagrant Fouls: These fouls are considered unnecessary and/or excessive. There are two types of flagrant fouls, 1 and 2. A flagrant 1 is unnecessary contact. This is usually when a defensive player swings and makes hard contact with the offensive player or makes hard contact and then follows through. A flagrant foul 2 is unnecessary and excessive contact. This usually has a swinging motion, hard contact, and a follow through. Both fouls carry a penalty of two free throws and the team that was fouled retains possession. A flagrant foul 2 also results in an ejection of the player committing the foul. A player also is ejected if he commits two flagrant foul penalty 1's.
Did I miss something? When did the Dodgers get "4" outfielders?
(Sorry, a bit delayed, was watching the Lakers game. Another attention deficit disorder sports day.)
(Just felt like saying that.)
Lousy GIDP there, buddy.
Provided you don't have a Scientific Atlanta set-top box.
http://tinyurl.com/58htjq
84 - I have to switch back and forth between the TV and my computer, so it's a little more challenging, but still fun.
I'm not quite sure what the thought process was behind that decision.
I still predict he's up before Nomar. Or at least, Nomar won't remain healthy for long when he does come back.
Kuroda's great start couldn't have come at a better time, desperately needed and great to see. Keep it up, Hiro!
I think if you check the archives DT folk were very high on Martin. When I tried to trade him for Tejada during his AA year I was strung up on a pole. And it appears with good reason.
Headed into todays game the Cubs and Astro's were looking to sweep the two best teams in the West. I never would have thought that was possible on March 15th .
Not that I would blame him in that situation.
I have abandonment issues you know.
and its good to see the dodgers are winning.
None of the Spanish curse words I know rhyme with "duck."
111 I'm a bit embarrassed cuz I always thought of myself as a hip hop aficionado but the name of the song escapes me. Maybe the next time up it'll trigger my memory.
Hooray!
And he's pitching a no-runner...!
Go baseball, indeed!
Kazuo Matsui did indeed play in a lot of games consecutively in Japan.
http://www.japanesebaseball.com/players/player.jsp?PlayerID=18
Nice come back, Hiro!
I'm going to go to a bookstore and get Glenn Stout's history of the Cubs.
Too bad he was only 5-10 from the line...
This afternoon has involved too much sports-related stress. I think I need to meditate.
And that rare RBI bunt with a runner at 2nd. Er, okay it's not an RBI, but still.
But he has to be considered close to ready.
Ah- that fell our way.
What an odd era this feels like to me--when a guy takes a no-no deep into the seventh, it used to be his to lose. Of course in American ball those days are long gone, as I remember Maddox gladly pully himself after six or so no-hit innings.
Excuse while i throw my computer out the window in anger, I hate the Utah Jazz..
is jones that much faster than kent?
And then there's Pierre, doing the same.
Yes, I believe Jones is faster than Kent, though right now probably not much. They're also probably trying to give Kent as much of a day off as he can get.
okay, let's go Blue Ox!
No, I guess not.
I should've just kept on napping.
I'm thinking of giving up sports, becoming a monk or something. Or a eunuch. I hear that pays pretty well.
So, you know, get comfortable.
Well, if this score holds up and it looks like it will, the Dodgers will have been swept on 3 different occasions (D-backs, Braves, and Astros) and also have won 8 in a row!
That almost is Webster's text book definition of streaky, and isn't streaky the opposite of consistent?
Just checking.
Can LaRoche play several positions at the same time?
Man, just a couple less hits that last half inning and I'd still be excited and hopeful.
I loved this game--hey Broxton has the right to blow up as rarely as he does.
This contrasted the nights I stayed up on the east coast to see the game go bye-bye in the first or second inning. This was a great game for Kuroda--and it's not over!
Er, excuse me, I'll be right back.
As noun or verb?
I believe Joe uses it as a verb, though ya never know.
What difference would it make if the Dodgers won and lost every other game, or won and lost in bunches, if the end result is the same?
Oh right, good stuff happened as recently as this past week. The thrill of victory, the agony of defeat. Today just feels more like not only the latter, but the guy wiping out tragically on the ski jump.
Well, I guess they could be considered consistently streaky!
Ouch! That hurt to write that!
>>Jason Schmidt threw 12 pitches and pitched a 1-2-3 inning in his first rehab start for Class A Inland Empire, topping out at 88 mph on the radar gun.
Schmidt allowed a flyout and two groundout. He was slated to throw just one inning. It was his first outing since shoulder surgery on June 20 last year.
Schmidt threw 10 fastballs and two changeups.<<
What do you want them to be? Would you be happier if they had the same record they have now by winning every other game as opposed to winning and losing streaks? How come?
Eventually, the Billikens won two straight games.
I'd like them to be a consistent team winning around 100-105 games with 5 consistent starters a solid bullpen and a great offense!
The fact they are none of these is not my fault. Nor do I have anything to do with it.
I'm confused, but okay.
Considering Dewitt is putting up an OPS+ greater than 115...it might not matter what Laroche is doing.
No wait, strike that, reverse it.
C Martin
1b Loney
2b Dewitt
SS Furcal
3b Laroche
LF Ethier
CF Someone besides Juan
RF Kemp
I'm saying, if they were consistent or maybe I should say capable of being consistent, they would not get swept so often and would not lose all these games they are losing and thus would be better.
The very fact that they are so inconsistent at least partially explains why they are not a very good team.
In my opinion good consistent teams are not prone to these types of streaks. I believe I heard in the playoffs last year (though I never bothered to look it up) that the Red Sox never lost 3 in a row until the playoffs. See consistent. Good team.
Does that help?
1b Loney
2b Hu
SS Furcal
3b DeWitt
LF LaRoche
CF Kemp
RF Ethier
Eric Enders has posted some good stuff about the fallacy of thinking teams need to be "consistent" to be successful. I'd link to them in the archives, but I'm not sure that's something I can do. A. Shimmin is really good at it, though.
Or maybe it's more focused on individual players being consistent or not. Same thing, ultimately.
Thus endeth an icky sports weekend for LA teams.
Have an afternoon, all!
Peaks and valleys stink.
I have misused consistent for the word good. Boston did not win it all last year because they were consistent. They won it all because they were good.
The fact they never lost more then 2 in a row is not because they were consistent. It was simply because they were good!
When I say that I want the Dodgers to be more consistent, what I am really wanting is for them to win more often. That is all.
294 - He seemed fine to me today. Though I didn't see every play. No errors though.
Ethier must be played.
Our fourth starter has more ceiling than most.
We have a large build up of things falling for the other guy.
I basically like it. I was feeling bad from staying up to watch the D's get blasted in the first two innings. This game reminded me why I love this team, and no team in the west has this potential.
0 runs -- 0-2
1 run -- 0-8
2 runs -- 0-1
3 runs -- 3-2
4 runs -- 0-2
5 runs -- 4-3
6 runs -- NA
7 runs -- 2-0
8 runs -- 3-0
9 runs-- 1-0
10 runs -- NA
11 runs -- 4-0
12 runs -- 1-0
13 runs -- 1-0
14 or more runs -- NA
In 2007, we scored 10 or more runs 10 times. This year in less than one-fourth of the season, we have already scored in double figures 6 times.
In 2007, we scored 0 runs or 1 run 26 times. Thus far this season that has already happened 10 times.
The Dodgers flat out choked hard by doing nothing in the midst of an unlikely sweep of the D'backs.
sorry I'm just still really upset, we need raffy back in the lineup, ethier needs to stay in the lineup...and quick question who plays 2b base better, laroche or Dewitt?
I realize it's just another game and that tomorrow's another day and each dark cloud has a silver lining and all that, but oy, I really wanted this one.
http://tinyurl.com/6rua7o
You have to go through a few screens to get to the Dodgers totals.
The D-backs are:
14-1 when scoring 6 runs or more (Dodgers 12-0)
8-8 when scoring 4 or 5 runs (Dodgers 4-5)
1-6 when scoring 3 or less runs (Dodgers 3-13)
Morale of the story? Dodgers need to score 6 or more! And by all means, stay away from those 0-3 runs scored games!
I almost wrote an entry wondering why we didn't bring Broxton in during the 7th with men on base and then either Proctor or Beimel in the 8th. I still think it was the right call.
Maybe it's because their offense is better?
Now I'm confused. Is it the pitching or the hitting that is the Dodgers undoing?
Do you think it could actually be both?
What've we got?
We've got heart
Miles 'n' miles 'n' miles of heart
Oh, it's fine to be a genius of course,
But keep that old horse before the cart
Van Buren:
Who minds those pop bottles flyin'
Rocky:
The hisses and boos
Mickey, Bubba, Ozzie, Smokey:
The team has been consistent
Bomber, Sohovik:
Yeah we always lose
Or maybe Orlando, but they'll disappear soon enough.
Whether its manu or umberto acting like a couple of diving argie football players. duncan extending his arms in complaint on every play(both sides of the ball), or bowen up to his filthy unsportmanlike tricks...the spurs are cemented as the most hatable team in the NBA in my mind