Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
While Blake DeWitt defies all expectations and only hits the ball harder and farther and more consistently when he was supposed to wilt, another Dodger infielder is conforming to expectations quite inconveniently.
Jeff Kent, who in previous seasons lost most of his fielding range, has stopped hitting at age 40. For the season, the Dodgers' nominal cleanup hitter has an on-base percentage of .287 (with the same number of walks as the never-walking Matt Kemp) and a slugging percentage of .383. He has 10 extra-base hits in 120 at-bats. His Value Over Replacement Player, which doesn't factor in his fielding, is a meager 0.9; one could interpret that to mean he is almost the equivalent of Luis Maza.
Kent's equivalent average, which rounds all his offensive abilities into a single number (with .260 being average), is .246 - its lowest total since he was establishing himself in 1992 and down more than 50 points from his pre-2008 average as a Dodger. In the past four weeks, Kent has a .263 on-base percentage and .271 slugging percentage.
Kent has slumped before - that's nothing new, and in and of itself would not be an issue. In April 2006, Kent slugged .244 on his way to a .554 OPS. The following month, he slugged .622 on his way to a 1.066 OPS. Great players have bad stretches, and I've always advocated patience and keeping the faith. That's why I've done so with Andruw Jones, as difficult as it's been to endure and as unguaranteed as the outcome might be. That's why I did so with Russell Martin in April and with some of the pitchers this month.
But Kent is at a stage where you have to wonder how much he can turn it around. It's not that he'll necessarily stay down at a 72 OPS+ when he hasn't been below 119 since 1997. But how much improvement can one expect? Consider what ToyCannon at True Blue L.A. wrote way back in November:
As Jeff Kent turns 40 he is about to enter an area that historically has not been kind to second basemen. Here is a list of second basemen sorted by age who ever did squat since integration. As you can see only HOF Joe Morgan was able to accomplish the feat (OPS+ above 100) at the age of 40 and most of that was accomplished by his OBP, and the OPS+ of 103 is hardly noteworthy. ...
I wasn't as prescient as this, but it was my offseason hope that Jones' arrival would allow Kent to be pushed out of the cleanup spot. Even I knew he would no longer be suited to bat fourth.
What seems likely is that Kent will have reassuring little bursts of offense here and there to disguise his mediocrity, much like Juan Pierre has had, and then fade again. (Yes, I'm going to pick on Pierre even after - or especially because - he was Wednesday's hero, because it's exactly at such a time that people need reminding that his offense and defense still pale next to that of Andre Ethier, wasting away at 26. Pierre's OPS since the Colorado series, including his 3-for-5 Wednesday, is .552, and his 2008 EQA is still 30 points below Ethier's.) So, at a minimum, the Dodgers had better make sure they have a Plan B in case Kent's decline is real.
Perhaps Chin-Lung Hu or eventually Tony Abreu is that plan. Perhaps Andy LaRoche or Blake DeWitt or Delwyn Young need to practice overtime at second base. Whatever it is, hopefully the team isn't burying its head in the sand. The end comes to the best of them. It might come late, and in Kent's case, it might, might just hold off for one more rebound. But don't get your hopes too high.
* * *
Jeff Passan gets up close and personal with Clayton Kershaw at Yahoo! Sports.
* * *
DeWitt's backed stiffened in the fifth inning Wednesday, according to Ken Gurnick of MLB.com, but DeWitt said after receiving postgame treatment that he felt good.
Dodgers at Brewers, 10:05 a.m.
Update: Knock me over with a feather. DeWitt was scratched from the lineup; Russell Martin is starting at third.
Forget defense, just get the best bats in the lineup. Sure, LaRoche may make a few errors, but he's young enough where he could improve.
If Kent doesnt bb anymore, he's done bc his power is all but gone.
The Dodgers problems boil down largely to lack of power. Their best power hitter is playing third base in the minors right now. Oh well.
Maybe next year.
http://tinyurl.com/445m8t
Our manager isn't concerned about power.
1. would the Dodgers be required to pay him if he wanted the money?
2. would the Dodgers be required to pay him if he didn't want the money?
Speaking of which, am I the only guy who was dismayed to learn Juan Pierre was the hero last night? I didn't see the game and noticed the highlights as I got home.
Since Pierre will never get hurt, this problem is all on Torre, just like it was all on Little, and I expect it to last all season.
The 3rd base situation will probably be up to the Fates and the trainers. The guy who can walk will play. If two guys can walk, DeWitt is the odd man out.
I've actually stopped TiVoing the games. I check in to see how games in progress are going, or I "watch" via Gamecast at work, but I just don't need the aggravation of watching better players rot on the bench while inferior players play. Again.
Shocking - but good times await us. The starting pitching will start giving up fewer runs as they pitch to their peripherals, A Jones will come back big, Kent will not be this bad, Furcal will be healthy again, and Pierre will sit again.
As others have advocated I'm sure the brain trust is discussing the DeWitt or LaRoche to 2nd base every night. Wouldn't shock me at all to see LaRoche playing 2nd base someday soon for Vegas. Of course the same brain trust might also be trying to trade LaRoche but we all know what will happen if they do. DeWitt's 1st slump will start the day LaRoche is dealt. I can't imagine that the Dodgers would be so short sited that they would be happy to rely on DeWitt for the rest of 2008.
Just like Hu's power display last Sept should be taken with a grain of salt so should his tepid start this spring. Don't be so quick to bury him, not every kid comes up ready to hit which makes what DeWitt doing even more special. He's also a SS where a special glove can make up for an anemic bat. I can't think of any other backup SS in the major leagues I'd rather have playing SS right now then Hu. Remember what Tulo did in his first go around and then how he did after his explosive sophmore season.
It should be noted that while only 10 people have ever had an 800 OPS at age 40 or above in 500 PA, only 26 people have done it age at 39 or older, and Kent is one of them.
Enjoy the win. We needed it.
Seems to me a drop from 26 to 10 is a large drop. I expect that of those 10 who did it at 40, all of them did it at 39. So would you consider those good odds that some of the greatest hitters of our time, only 10 of them would be able to repeat the skill only one year later?
If Kent retired and put himself on the voluntarily retired list, he wouldn't be getting paid anymore.
There's a very good chance Kent could be done, I said as much before, but we shouldn't just give up on him because he's 40.
Pierre, LF
Jones, CF
Ethier, RF
Kent, 2B
Loney, 1B
Martin, C
DeWitt, 3B
Maza, SS
Billingsley, P
With no real option at 2nd base, Kent needs to perform and prove me wrong for us to be successful. I've even got a column ready to go for when he breaks out and I hope I get to use it.
Hoo boy, I'm seeing 3 runs max today from the Blue Crew. Maybe Billingsley has one of those 9 inning shutouts in him.
So what were the odds of seeing a left side of the infield of Maza/DeWitt for the Dodgers in May?
I don't think his minor league fiedling stats set hearts aflutter.
http://minors.baseball-reference.com/players.cgi?pid=3896
All the way back in 4 .
Nasty indeed. But his stats at 3B don't impress either.
He's also a SS where a special glove can make up for an anemic bat.
Can anyone give me an example of another SS with a great glove and no bat that is starting right now? Both Izturus brothers and Orlando Cabrera immediately come to my mind. Taking those three guys for example, I would say only the White Sox have enough potential offensive firepower to combat the black hole in the lineup that is their SS. I don't think the Angels nor the Cardinals can afford to keep playing those guys without it hurting their chances of success in the long run. I guess that's my point. I don't see Hu or Abreu for that matter, contributing continually to the team's success. I see their presence in a lineup already lacking power as a serious detriment. I would rather resign Furcal and try a LaRoche experiment at 2nd or sign a free agent (Orlando Hudson maybe?) than go with Hu or Abreu as one of our starting infielders next year.
It's never been about disdain for the actual player, just for the decision that brought them here in the first place. :)
Trust me, a lot of people are mighty upset about Andruw Jones.
http://tinyurl.com/555wbe
I would feel more comfortable racing David Wells.
I can give you a long list. The offensive era of the SS is already over.
Other then NY, Texas, Indians, and Detroit I don't see one SS who is considered an above average offensive player in the AL.
Boston - Lugo - no offense or defense
Tampa - Bartlett - good defense, little offense
Balt - zippo on both fronts
Toronto - zippo on both fronts
KC - good defense, no offense
Twins - all about defense, zero offense
CWS - good defense, aveage offense
Angels - who knows, to early to tell what Aybar brings
A's - no offense, Crosby hasn't hit in years
Seattle - good defense, some offense
In the NL you have Reyes, Rollins, Hanley
all in the East. One guy in the central Tejada.
Atlanta - no one thinks Escobar can keep this up. expect a decline
Florida - Hanley is so bad defensively he's a joke
Nat's - on an offensive tear, care to bet on where it ends up
Cubs - Theriot - really
Brewers - JJ Hardy is quite average offensivley other then one month in 2007
Cardinals - Izzy I
Pirates - Jack Wilson all about defense, no offense
Arizona - Drew - who knows
Giants - zippo
Padres - you think Green and his subpar 300 OBP is an offensive SS?
Dodgers - Furcal when healthy
Tulo - one great year, one bad year, take a look at his road numbers in 2007 and is he really anything special offensively?
I stand by my statement.
a) finally allow Ned to trade him?
b) finally allow Ned and Torre to play him?
I think the same thing about Kyle Korver. He looks like Carrot Top, not Ashton Kutcher.
Welcome to Dodger Thoughts Hammer!
I thought maybe I saw you on Bronx Banter once. Anyway, I'm headed to NYC to see the Yanks in July. Do you have any Pizza restaurant recommends in either Manhattan or the Outer Boroughs?
As for Pierre, yes, I agree with all the others.
I enjoy what I am seeing from Torre so far. He's a very calm, well intentioned, good leader, in my eyes.
It's quite simply a preference for another player who is more talented and also a hard worker. It's nothing personal against Pierre.
B) They've played him in twelve straight
Really, whenever I see him it says Kutcher to me.
How come the Griddle is not on this story?
I don't hear those chirpers anymore. I wonder why.
That's a nice list and all but how may of those guys you listed (subjective comments aside, ex:Atlanta - no one thinks Escobar can keep this up. expect a decline) actually hurt their team by their lack of offensive prowess?
Lugo for example, doesn't hurt Boston because they have the offense to make up for him. My point is that the Dodgers don't have the offense to make up for a guy like Hu, who doesn't or hasn't hit at all. I'm not saying he needs to be a slugger, he just needs to hit somewhat consistently. By not hitting and not having other sufficient/proven power sources in our daily lineup, he hinders our chances of winning.
That 10th inning in game 2 of the doubleheader Monday killed their streak.
Still, they have five straight games of allowing 0 runs in the first 9 innings (4 of them shutouts).
Today that might be true but what are you going to do? His job is to play defense and add whatever offense he can. It is up to the offensive players to make up the slack of the missing Furcal not a 1st year SS replacing the hottest hitter on the team.
But the Indians gave up 3 runs on Monday night.
I believed I showed today that you can throw 18 innings and give up 1 run and still be the loser.
He may have to go back to 1948 for a championship, but I envy him because he has "Major League".
What game was greater for the losing pitcher, the game you referenced or the Harvy Haddix game?
Lefty Williams had a game score of 111 in the 1918 loss.
The White Sox did the same thing with Podboy and they ended up winning a world championship. It would be bad for baseball if it happened again. We need to win the World Championship with Ethier in LF or we could see a plethora of sad sack left fielders whose only asset is speed.
So essentially you are saying that as a fan, I should not reasonably expect a defensive wiz replacement SS to hit and that the rest of the team should make up for his deficiencies? The only problem I have with that logic is that he is in the major leagues. Not just anyone makes the big show. If you do make it to the highest level you are expected to contribute or you move on. Hu hasn't done anything spectacular in the field so far this year, that I can recall. And I watch every game. DeWitt has been more impressive defensively than Hu has been. He hasn't hit either. So where does that leave him? On the bench today. I hope this Maza dude can do something so we can put this to bed and I won't have to watch another game with both Pierre and Hu in the lineup.
But hey, I was thrilled they came back and won last night and gave Pierre all the proper due for helping out.
Now... go Dodgers! Let's sneak away with this one.
Posts 43 & 228 of this thread:
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/985156.html
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/985156.html#comments
Do you have links or stats to prove that Hu can hit successfully in the majors? Since Maza has never been up with a big club, I know there is no evidence to say that he can or can't hit big league pitching.
I think a lot of people here think that Hu is next in the line of Martin/Loney/Kemp/Bills/Broxton..and so on. The difference is that all the other Dodger home grown talent made immediate impacts, statements if you will, to say, "Hey I belong here." Hu hasn't done that IMO.
http://tinyurl.com/5pncsb
Since Maza has never been up with a big club, I know there is no evidence to say that he can or can't hit big league pitching
This is delving far to close into "Who's to say?" territory. I've never been in the major leagues either, so there's no evidence that I can't hit.
Minor league numbers do translate into the majors. It doesn't matter whether you believe it or not. Hu has had 60 PA so far this season, and nothing close to regular time. Furcal's DL stint is the best opportunity to give Hu the regular time he needs to get into a groove (pulling a DeWitt, if you will).
Broxton had a 5.93 ERA in just under 14 IP in 2005 when he came up. Under your logic, should the Dodgers have dumped him?
Okay, I was feeling confident this lineup could score a few runs, now I'm not so sure. Cmon Bills!
I wasn't asking that question to be a smart aleck. Sorry if it came off that way but that was in no means my intention.
I'm just trying to get to the bottom of why so many people seem to think that Hu is the answer for the Dodgers future infield when he has yet to show anything of any significance. Granted it has been a small sample size but the point I tried to make by citing Loney/Bills/Kemp etc.. is that in a small sample size of watching them, we saw amazing potential relatively quickly.
(OK .... maybe its not so big news)
Position players and pitching prospects are not measured in the same context. Your statement has no legs.
Fair enough.
You mentioned Broxton as a player having an "immediate impact".
And that's your weather report. Now back to the game.
You're correct I did, but I'm not taking just his ERA as criteria.
I don't think it's even conventional wisdom, let alone unconventional wisdom that a player has to have an immediate impact.
Of the 18 starters in todays game, 2 are hitting over .300, that makes for the potential of a very interesting game.
vr, Xei
I would love to see LaRoche get a shot anywhere on the field, mainly because he is a legitimate power threat who can contribute offensively to a power starved team. He fits into what I would like to see the Dodgers infield become. He is the exact opposite of Hu in the sense that his fielding is suspect but his bat is there. The question becomes what do you value more potential offense or stellar defense? In the case of the Dodgers who have been without legitimate power for I can't remember how long, I would much rather see LaRoche get a shot than Hu. We've had weak hitting IF's for too many years. It's time for a change.
The California Supreme Court has essentially said, "Not that there's anything wrong with it..."
Please don't discuss it here.
Now it has them talking about how the Dodger kids and the Dodger vets last year didn't get along blah blah blah but you wouldn't see that here in Milwaukee, everyone's supportive blah blah and have you ever seen Braun say something he shouldn't have in an interview? {{MUTE}}
168 Yah, and I'll be biking to the office this afternoon, when it's nice and blazing. It's even a little smoggy in San Fran today, which is unusual to say the least.
I think pitching prospects get more leeway because everyone covets pitching. Not to say that teams don't covet great all around position players but you hear the same adage time and time again about how pitching wins championships. Inherently I think teams give pitching prospects a longer leash because they have potentially more to gain if they live up to their hyped potential than say that of an above average SS or LF'er. Pure speculation on my part.
Uniform numbers are irrelevant. We've been over this before.
Maza
Bennett
Billingsley
Pierre
Jones
in a row.
If the Dodgers are to win this one, someone unlikely gonna have to come through unexpectedly.
But three Sheets to the wind that inning.
He could very well turn out to be that. He could very well go the other way too. I would rather give LaRoche a shot to contribute because he brings more to the table offensively on an offensively challenged team.
I feel like I'm starting to state the same things over and over again so at the risk of violating any rules, I politely bow out of any further discussions of Hu!
I don't really understand your point. Yes, Hu looks overmatched right now. So does a 40 year old 2nd baseman and a 31 year old center fielder. Why are you judging him so quickly? By your reckoning Tulo never would have been given a chance to have his break out season in 2007. He was awful in the field and at the plate during his freshman season. I can remember Scareduck making a reference to how pathetic he looked.
As far as the glove goes I don't recall a SS getting this much love for his glove as Hu as gotten from the scouts and performance analysts. Time will tell if they were right, but why your ready to sell Hu down the Chang Jiang river based on a few at bats doesn't make any sense to me.
vr, Xei
Didn't see your post while I was making mine. I will also move on.
Otherwise I shall be watching on the older MLBTV player so I can pause the game for awhile.
(That could be a newspaper headline circa 1940s)
From 192
I feel like I'm starting to state the same things over and over again so at the risk of violating any rules, I politely bow out of any further discussions of Hu!
Ha! I was posting again as well so I didn't see yours. Please disregard 205 .
But I wonder: do they distract hitters as well?
as long as the pajamas do not have a cartoon character on them (or have feet), you are OK ...
I'm wearing a tuxedo and shoes with spats.
That's my traditional Dodger Thoughts commenting gear.
Hmmm...
TERRY TIFFEE!!
Trade for Eric Chavez?
I'm wearing my usual, red suit, blue cape, a smorgasbord of super energy pills in front of me.
You're missing one guy, the best one in fact! :)
My other complaint has nothing to do with the station, but if I produced the Dodgers radio broadcast, I would present Rick Monday with a simple piece of constructive advice - next time you come back from commercial without saying the score, we're going to fire you. Is that too harsh? After 20 years (or whatever its been?) The last two nights, I turned on the game in the car on the way home, and did not get a score either time.
Thanks!
218
I'm doing pretty much the same thing minus the coat. America, whata country!
..........I just thought I'd point that out.
I hope that's an error.
Raffy come back, we need you!
You're in for a beating, pal.
A virtual Rule 9 beating.
Aw, is that part of the rule too? :)
That's what I told the cop, anyway.
On second thought, you've probably got a pair of plus fours in your closet.
...that was not done. I... holy moly... I threw that out there in reference to this Dodger game, but I didn't even recognize that there is a game at Shea Stadium that has "interesting" potential.
Ethier/Jones/Kemp
Pierre/Jones/Kemp
Pierre/Kemp/Ethier
Pierre/Jones/Ethier
Good idea/bad idea? I'm honestly not sure, but if all four guys are going to get playing time, this seems to be the way to maximize playing time for the guys who should be playing
Its amazing how much Tony Abreu's injury continues to affect the makeup of this roster.
I take responsibility for taking the "interest" out of the game, even if my action was technically legal.
287 - True, true, we can weather the storm til Raffy gets back and then everything will be a lot better. It's a domino effect.
Back in the day, all bridesmaids wore fusia (sp.)
Just make sure to not get sunburned and don't drink the water.
Well, what really hurts is Bills having to be near-perfect because Ben Sheets is pitching and the Dodgers don't have the strongest line-up in the world.
Ay caramba, they're still doing in game sideline interviews about the Braun contract. I mean every inning, they've been doing the PR spin thing for this. It was boring in the first inning.
(splat)
The OF solution is simple, but will never happen:
1) Kemp & Ethier every day
Let the rest sort itself out.
If he starts multiple games, then we can talk.
Oh, no. This team sucks.
305 Very fair.
for all you hear about his great baserunning distracting the pitcher, i guess it goes both ways.
I didn't say you owned them...
I like the idea of the toupee mustache.
But he hasn't been playing nice, even by Pierre standards. .552 OPS since Colorado. Ouch.
---
Bob, I'll let you lead into the game at Shea. It's better not to have another freudian slip.
Or does it just seem that way.
The Joey P stew story was awesome. I was surprised he didn't follow it up with what happened to the wrestler after the olympics.
Yep.
Thanks bh. Yep, everyone, I am about to make my first ever visit to the East Coast. Prior to this year I've never been further East than Arizona.
So yea... got any good pizza tips?
Pitches 91-105 - .143/.250/.143
Nice swing big man.
Leading off inning in 2008: .269/.367/.462/.829
So you want credit for a 1-0 victory when there's a 1-0 lead in the seventh inning?
Do I have to re-explain the Kreuter Phenomenon?
In fairness to me, you already submitted your entries so there was no reason to list you!
Kent Hits Over the Wall
The Kreuter Phenomenon would certainly apply to Jon's main post.
John's on Bleecker St. in the West Village is very good. For a single slice, I like Two Boots (various locations).
Along with the pizza, make sure you hit the good delis while you're in NYC. That would be Katz's and Junior's, not REPEAT not Stage, Carnegie, or Roxie's. You're welcome.
I told you this team didn't have enough Veteran Clubhouse Presence.
</sarcasm>
They're really starting to nail Sheets. That's three XBH in a row.
Sheets has never been that great at preventing homers. Thats 6 in 50ip this year.
Except, I'm not watching.
That a boy Golden God!!!
Isn't 6 in 50 innings really good?
Yessssssss! Atta boy, Andruw! That made me so happy...
WHYYYYYYYYYY!
21-19 through the first 40 games is probably about where this team should be. Nothing quite surprising. Dewitt/Furcal have been great. Druw/Kent have been bad. Everyone else about where they should be.
On pace for 84-85 wins.
Pretty much a ho-hum Dodger season so far.
I also walked into Babbo on a Sunday night with no reservation. This is Mario Batalli's signature restaurant in the Village. It took a while to get a seat at the bar for one but I then had one the best dining experiences ever. It wasn't cheap but I really enjoyed it.
Zing!
Love that name
Bennett!
This taped delayed blog comment is brought to you by Meister Brau.
Even the good pitchers can get creamed by bad hitters.
Gary Bennett?
Just to check my impression, I watched part of the Angel/White Sox game last night and it wasn't nearly as compelling.
OK, my answer really would have included Maza.
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/922180.html
Comment #196.
--
Thank you guys very much for the Pizza Tips! I'm definitely looking forward to this vacation :)
It was the maddest I've ever seen RM.
And now I can go into my meeting feeling at peace with the world. Thanks Dodgers and thanks Ned Yost!
I feel you on that. I have him too plus Andruw is on my bench, where he's been since week 2.
Of course all was forgiven when Maza got that base hit. But it was a full circle moment were Martin the veteran was pissed at Maza the kid.
The way that sentence is formulated, you can arrange the three names in any order, and it still remains accurate.
Go Blue!
Honestly, as long as you steer clear from the Sbarro's that line Times Square, you'll be just fine.
If it werent for the name, I dont think they'd be related.
Of course, that could probably be applied to many people.
He should go for the complete game shut out.
Martin at 3B, Hu at SS, Maza at 2B, and Loney (okay I would have picked him).
And Loney is now the captain of the infield.
Good news...martin has now been at third base 5 times...that means he's eligible there in my fantasy league. ;)
If you are up for an outer borough trek, Sac's Pizza in Astoria is awesome! Just take the N train to the Broadway stop in Astoria, and walk about two blocks.
http://www.sacsplace.com/
But why would you use Martin at 3B? Isn't he way more valuable as a catcher?
Oh, Ryan Braun designs and sells T-shirts
Just in case he never makes any money playing baseball. Oh wait! :)
Hoo boy, I'm seeing 3 runs max today from the Blue Crew. Maybe Billingsley has one of those 9 inning shutouts in him.
I'm way off on the first half of that comment.
That would be funny if Plaschke wrote a sob story about all 4 outfielders, saying how hard everyone one of them works, and why they all deserve to start. Not that he'd write one about Andruw...
I vote no.
Billingsley going deep into this game will really keep the pen fresh. They'll need it for this stretch.
He's obvioulsy not going to finish the game under 120 pitches, so use the hook now Joe.
506 Joe is listening.
ATTENTION, FREE-AGENT SHOPPERS: Will Rafael Furcal ever make it to the free-agent auction stand? Maybe not. There are indications his agent, Paul Kinzer, has told the Dodgers that he and Furcal have interest in talking in-season about an extension. And clearly, the Dodgers would share that interest, considering that Furcal leads their team in runs, hits, doubles, batting average and even homers. Furcal was also slugging .597 when he headed for the disabled list this week. The only Dodgers shortstop who ever even got within 140 points of that was Glenn Wright -- in 1930.
is the in-season extension a good idea?
Yeah, not that there's ever a good time for a walk, but up by 6 runs you'd like to see a few more strikes.
I'm not saying there shouldn't be, I'm just tired of hearing about it.
Why is Broxton pitching today?
DP was timely. Braun could have made it a 6-4 game.
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=7526
Conclusion:
"For two position players of equal ability, taking the younger one is usually the safe call. I think Russell Martin has a broad skill set that is going to produce excellent performance, and the defensive edge he has on McCann adds up over time. However, McCann's power is hard to pass up, and it's not like he's a bad defensive catcher. On the margins, I prefer to take a left-handed batter where I can, and the load that Martin is going to carry over the next couple of years may take its toll.
"So I'm going to stand by my initial evaluation, that McCann is the choice over Martin. It's very close, and this exercise has increased my appreciation for just how many things Martin does well. In the end, though, I'll take the upside of McCann because of his power potential."
He does have a 150 OPS+ thus far.
-Brian McCann is good, but Russell is forever.
-Am I the only one who has to mute the TV when those disgusting Carl's Jr. ads come up? They seriously make me want to yack.
Gary Bennett saying take that all you naysayers.
Where are you now? Anywhere near a Hardee's? Aren't they all over?
I would have accepted you missing In N Out more.
I like how Maza has ended up having a very nice game.
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B/PX_benng001.htm
He's had five twice, once against the Padres Sept. 20, 2003, and against the Nationals on June 2, 2005.
I don't think there's anyway Furcal takes less than four years. He could certainly get at least that on the FA market.
My hunch is Pierre will be the one tomorrow.
.321/.423/.595 in 131 Abs.
Billingsley might deserve player of the game, but he'll have plenty more similar performances. Bennett? Not so much.
I don't care how much we expect or mentally prepare for such things, but that news really irks me for some reason.
"Matt Kemp has cooled off of late. He's 2 for 8 in the series... 0-5 yesterday."
Mmmmmyeeeeah. So 2-3 in game 1 right Rick? Ice cold!
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/972079.html
I already dubbed him the Tinfoil God!
There's lots of terrific California-only fast food joints that I miss. Carl's Jr is most definitely not among them.
http://www.jcws.com/
I always thought they were the same. Then again, I'll fight to the death with anyone claiming Cheese Nips, Hi Hos, or Hydrox are as good as Cheez-It's, Ritz, or Oreos, respectively, so I can see where you are coming from.
I would rank burgers thusly:
1) In N Out
2) Carls Jr
3) Burger King
...
98) McDonalds
Hey what about "The Habit"?
...and Tommmy's?
That must be close to a record.
Carl's Jr. is also very good. Having worked for Mickey D's, I can tell you that familiarity breeds a special form of contempt, but at the same time, they are better than a lot of others... just none you'd want to eat at.
Oddly, In-N-Out has the worst fries of any large chain. Cooking fries fresh works against them; Mickey D's has good fries. Carl's, Jr. used to have the best fries, but that was back in the late 70's when they used powdered processed potatoes. Their current ones aren't too distinguishable from McDonald's.
I ignore a lot of cities.
So far I've got:
Lombardi's
John's
Two Boots
Katz's
Junior's
Give me more!
Oh, that place. I've been in that city when it was 100.
I loved it, but it looked like the rest of the people in the area were going to drop dead.
That's a good question. Today, all the official Habit restaurants are called "The Habit"
The very first one near me in Goleta was originally called "The Hamburger Habit" but now its also just "The Habit"
Boy oh boy I think California is eventually going to invade NYC at this rate :)
Blue, since I'm in your boat (just two months later) I have one recommendation: Papaya King!!!!
I think my bike tires are melting.
I gave up on trying pause the rest of this game during my meeting because MLBTV decided it got tired of waiting and crashed my computer, bless it's little heart. But besides burger talk, I see I missed 1 more Dodger run and 2 Brewers runs. And one out away from winning 2 out of 3 in Milwaukee which feels close to a miracle given how the series looked at the beginning.
We win!
A long drive to deep centerfielder t hat Jones runs down ends it. Wade got the first two outs and then Kepler got an infield hit on a little grounder past the pitcher's mound.
It was not "Michigan hot." I have never experienced "Michigan hot" except for that one day.
You don't ever want to be in "Michigan hot."
Good pizza and good delis are what I'm looking for, but Papaya King definitely goes on the list.
Since the initial thread, I researched a few other tips from NY-based boards... they say to avoid this place called "Ray's Pizza". Anyone heard of it?
My g/f says its several degrees warmer in Palo Alto right now.
It is not Michigan hot. It is however, less pleasantly hot than I would prefer.
But it doesn't matter because... we win! Huzzah!
Of course, there's about 10,000 fantastic restaurants in Manhattan. You won't starve.
I still cant believe the way we won these last two games, and where the run support came from.
The only two hitters Logan White has picked in the 1st round have a career major league OPS+ of 123 and 130.
Let me know how your trip goes too! I can't wait to make my first visit later on.
Katz's is where they filmed the deli scene in "When Harry Met Sally".
some people DO like they're burgers to have some grease on them...
definitely Carls jr has the best burgers out of the fast food chains. setting aside In n Out, the best burger place period at around $2 per.
I totally agree with Scareduck. Never understood the chili burger lovefest.
like THEIR burgers
Okay, back to work. Cheers all!
There Burgers and fries are so unbelievable its scary. They offer all kinds of mustards and ketchups to go along with their crispy, airy fries. I had a greek burger with feta and green peppers, but they have like 20 different types of burgers to chose from, the product is so fresh and good
If anyone happens to find another one, I really recommend trying it, its unbelievable as far as burger chains go..
Fully endorsed by Joe Posnanski too.
Now back to burger thoughts.
Burger & onion rings, please.
Avoid Katz's and Junior's (which is in Brooklyn.) While it is a famous and well-know place, the quality at Katz's has gone way down over the past few years. More of a tourist trap now.
Junior's is horrible--nothing better than a mediocre diner.
If you like steak, try Sammy's Romanian on Chrystie Street. They have been around forever, and play up the Lower East Side Jewish shtick--they serve chocolate pudding and seltzer from the bottle, along with glasses of chilled vodka--but the skirt steak is very good. Pricey though.
""Do I have a gambling problem? Yeah, I do have a gambling problem," Barkley said. "But I don't consider it a problem because I can afford to gamble."
I dunno I'm not sure if anyone lives in the Westlake Village area, but theres a little place called "The Ranch" normally the cater exclusively, but if you walk in the owner will amke you a burger on the spot. The bake their own buns and make their own sauces and marinades. Its a massive burger, but arguably the best burger I've had in my life. My dad has sent people out there to try it because he was so impressed by it and he works in food and beverage.
RELX, what do you recommend out there for a good pastrami sandwich?
vr, Xei
You bet! Two friends and I are going to try to pull off the Yankees/Mets dbl header. Take the 4 train up for the Yankee day game then ride back down and take the 7 train to the Mets game the same night.
Its so remarkable how the teams compare to the Lakers and Clippers out here. Yankee tickets are really hard to get, and they cost twice as much as similar Mets seats.
Somebody get me a cheeseburger!
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.