
|
Give Piazza His Day
2008-05-20 23:04
Los Angeles owes Mike Piazza a big thank you. The Dodgers need to be proactive in making sure it happens. The sooner he is honored at Dodger Stadium, the better. A propos of this, here's Bill Shaikin in the Times: Piazza loved L.A. -- the fans, the night life, the perennial promise of October -- and L.A. loved him back. But free agency loomed after the 1998 season, initial negotiations did not go well, and all of a sudden L.A. knew he wanted a record-setting contract. Fred Claire, the general manager, figured he had all season to make a deal. The new Fox ownership wanted to rid itself of Piazza and buddy up to the Florida Marlins for television rights purposes, so the corporate suits traded Piazza to the Marlins in May, then told Claire what they had done. ... In his statement (today), Piazza thanked all the teams, managers and fans for which he played, but he singled out the Mets' fans as "the greatest fans in the world." (Tommy) Lasorda, the Dodgers' chief salesman, said he was not offended. He said Piazza was stung by boos at Dodger Stadium, before and after the trade. He would try, he said, to persuade Piazza to wear a Dodgers cap on his Hall of Fame plaque. Persuasion should not have been necessary. The late, great Times columnist Jim Murray called it, two days after the trade: "The Dodgers always have adhered to the Branch Rickey theory of roster cutting that it's better to deal a player a year early than a year late. But in Piazza's case, 10 years early?" Jay Jaffe runs Piazza's Hall of Fame credentials up the Baseball Prospectus flagpole, so we can all salute. Hopefully, the next time Piazza visits Dodger Stadium, he won't get those tasteless boos from the thoughtless. * * * Check out Tuesday's In the Bleachers from Steve Moore. Too close for comfort?
|
They did such a wonderful job on opening day, so maybe...
(I'm sure Chris Carter will some day turn into a fine major leaguer, but right now... I say, thanks DBax, since you're strong enough as it is.)
Doesn't mean that the trade wasn't a shock.
---
It's funny how 1998 seems like ages ago, and it was ten years now, but it just seems like forever and a day. I feel like I blacked out during and after that trade, blacked out any memory of the Dodgers around then.
Strange but true- Denker was born the same month as Blake DeWitt in August 1985.
http://tinyurl.com/4kd8fs
Peter Chernin looks more benevolent. Unless you were a member of the WGA. Then you would think he's pure evil.
http://tinyurl.com/4wu2nt
http://tinyurl.com/6xjmbu (highly profane)
http://tinyurl.com/5kwbb9
Please do not watch any more of "Torn Curtain" than you have to. It's one of the dopiest Hitchcock films ever made.
The insinuation by Lasorda that Piazza was maybe two-three hours away from being our backup catcher makes me incredibly sad. That is despite the fact the it probably is not true.
I'm still bitter.
Piazza should have NEVER been in any uniform other than a Dodgers uniform.
Mike Piazza, the strongest man in baseball.
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/2008/05/dodgers-4-reds.html
``I don't want to put that (ace label) on him,'' Torre said. ``His personality is such that he puts enough pressure on himself without thinking he has to be the leader of this staff. Right now, he is taking his turn and giving us reasons to feel good about him, just giving us very solid performances. He had seven strikeouts in the first five innings, but he also made them hit the ball, and that's a really big thing for him.''
http://tinyurl.com/4emuxz
20 - I like the show okay, but that was not the most artfully plotted episode. I wasn't buying Ted in much of it.
Anyway, glad the series has been picked up. And I think the Barney and Robin thing has a lot of comedy gold potential. I'm thinking when Chandler and Monica started dating on Friends but did not want anyone to know. At the very least, it should be intriguing and fresh.
I like Barney and Robin's potential much more than Chandler-Monica, mainly because they figure to be a much less annoying couple. And I liked Friends, at least for a while.
I'll give you one guess as to whose game article today starts with that paragraph.
"It is bad enough that the Cincinnati Reds lost their eighth straight game in Dodger Stadium to a pitcher with a 3-5 record and a 4.34 earned run average, but it makes it even worse that they lost in front of a supposedly hip Hollywood crowd that still does The Wave."
Chad must be in charge of the elevators at Dodger Stadium.
I respect the heck out of Tony Jackson, who provides a lot of information via his blog, but he's ridiculous.
Billingsley 124
Peavy 124
Haren 122
Penny 117
Lowe 115
Beckett 111
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/Mxzc
By the way, Billingsley's ERA as a starter -- before last night (Baseball-Reference.com hasn't yet been updated this morning) -- was 3.36 from 2006-2008, moving his ERA+ into the 134 range, which would tie Chad with John Smoltz for #5 on the list.
Kuo 2.53
Billingsley 3.08
Lowe 3.62
Kuroda 3.99
Penny 4.13
Loaiza 4.60
Park 5.20
Somewhere in there there's a joke about Hal McCoy not being able to see the truth.
vr, Xei
I'm with you on this one. With Park & Loaiza as the other 5th starter options, there is no reason Kuo shouldn't start.
BHsportsguy--Its kinda of strange you'd pick these three things out. Valentin was just a 1yr cheap stop gap that got hurt. He had a good year with the Mets afterward.
Phillips was a backup catcher, and really the key wasnt getting Phillips it was getting rid of Ishii.
DePo's deal with Drew got the Dodgers a good player at 2/22. Thats a great deal that worked out perfectly for them.
There's no comparison between the mistakes that DePo made and the mistakes that Colletti continues to make. DePo's mistakes were small in nature (Jim Tracy, Erickson, signing Izzy to a 3 yr deal).
Comparing his bad stuff to Ned's: Druw, Nomar, Schmidt, Loaiza, trading Navarro/Edwin...its not even in the same level.
Maybe DePo could have done more---but I tell you what: A Dodger OF of Werth, Kemp, Bradley, Drew would look mighty fine right now at a much smaller cost than what Ned's playing for the current crop.
Sheffield had the highest contract in MLB, signing a 6/$61m deal with Florida just before the 1998 season. Piazza was making $8m in 1998, his final year before free agency. I don't remember what the Dodgers' offer was (I want to say in the 7/$75m range), but Piazza was right to turn that down, given the market that was about to happen.
Salaries were about to explode. In the ensuing offseason, Kevin Brown (7/$105), Mo Vaughn (6/$80m), Bernie Williams (7/$87.5), and Randy Johnson (4/$53.4) among others signed huge deals. Piazza himself signed for 7/$91m with the Mets.
As I recall (based on what was reported) prior to the trade the Dodgers offered Piazza a contract that was the about the same as the one he ended up signing with the Mets, Piazza made it known that he wanted to be the first $100M player and decided that he would no longer negotiate until after the season.
He's a witch. BURN HIM!!!
46 And my great heresy: I don't like Monty Python & the Holy Grail.
The line for heretics, witches, and apostates forms BEHIND Daniel.
Piazza is going into the Hall of Fame as a Met and I don't blame him for a second.
That passage hurt my feelings. I must not be a very good fan, as a Dodger Fan. If that's true, Dodger fans who go to the ballpark must not be very appreciative or smart in comparison.
In the 80s, did the Dodger fans ever cheer on Steve Garvey in his last game at DS (in a Padres Uniform?), or Cey in his Cubs uniform?
I look at us, and I feel lousy today. If Mets fans can show that kind of class, I can only wish we reciprocate.
Cey finished his career with the A's, actually.
When Dodger fans booed Steve Finley, whom the team chose not to offer a contract to, in 2005 I knew that there was no hope left.
The souls of Dodger Stadium fans had become irredeemable.
(Exceptions for soul redemption can be made in writing for a $5 fee payable to me.)
That's an ugly, harsh truth, and I might have to drink heavily to come to grips with it.
The Dodgers have a Yankee for a Manager, a Giant as a GM, and a Boston fan as an owner.
Mostly because I liked Bill Russel and Alston and Lasorda established a LA tradition for a Manager to manage for 20 plus years I wanted Russel to have a long realm as manager. Not only did that not happen but we lost Scoscia as well.
I don't know what Piazza wants to do but if he would like to be part of the Dodger organization, I would hope McCourt would give him a visible role.
O'Malley did not want to sign a big contract while he was selling the Dodgers so Piazza had to wait. If it weren't for the process of selling the Dodgers, Piazza would have been signed before the season started without distractions.
vr, Xei
People dont understand how good Chad is. Of the pitchers you mentioned, I'd only take Hamels and maybe Lincecum over him. He needs more pub.
True, Ned has had the resources and the additional years of experience for the farm system that DePodesta did not have in his time here.
But I get that feeling here at times that its Paul good and Ned bad and I just don't tend to view things that way.
I just think the fans don't realize it is okay to be silent and not boo. On Monday night they were booing Griffey at his at bats and the entire team when it was announced. I know we go on and on about this, but how do you boo a guy like Griffey?
By the way, I was fortunate enough on Monday night to see Heidi and Spencer on the jumbo tron from "The Hills" (heavy sarcasm)
{Rule 1}{Rule 1}{Rule 1}{Rule 1}. Classic.
Actually, I think the anti-trust exemption means they DON'T have to abide by certain rules.
As for the respect issue, I agree 100 percent, but let's be honest. This is the franchise that traded Jackie Robinson to the Giants, that stiffed Koufax and Drysdale, that sent away Garvey, Lopes, and Cey. We can't expect fans to respect our former heroes if management itself doesn't. Piazza after all was just one of many guys who cried when he heard the team had traded him away, so did Buckner, and yes, so did LoDuca. On this, I give McCourt credit. Maybe it's because he's a Sox fan, but aside from ignoring Scioscia as a possible manager, he seems to have a sense of team tradition, as we saw on opening day. I hope now that he keeps it up. Honoring Piazza and Nomo with more than a first pitch would be good next steps. Advance apologies for the rant.
On the other hand, the M's are owned by Nintendo, for all intents and purposes.
If the Dodgers can make good with Fernando Valenzuela, there is indeed hope. Bob, will you accept my 5 dollars in cash or check?
McCourt can be blamed for lots of things, not hiring Mike Scioscia is not one of them.
Seriously, man, Dodger Stadium fans today are flat out stupid. I remember during the last game I was at a guy was really letting Kemp have it for misplaying the ball during our game vs the D-backs. I wanted to let him have it, but I decided not to.
I have to admit, as much as I love baseball and the Dodgers in particular, I really don't care much for going to games any more.
I have to admit though, when the team doesn't win a playoff series in 20 years, a lot of things can go sour. I have to admit, if let's say, the Lakers went 20 years without winning a playoff series, one could only imagine the amount of vitrol in the stands. We could be hearing more boos at Staples Center.
So my "stupidity" rant was overstated. If the Knicks fans can turn on their own, I don't think it precludes any fanbase to embitter themselves after years of frustration.
Then we can move them back to SoCal!
That'll learn 'em!
John Smoltz 22nd round, 574th overall.
Minors 21-24 4.13 ERA and not even a 2-1 K/BB ratio.
Majors 210-147 3.25 ERA 154 saves, 3011 K's 992 BB 15 Division Title Rings, 5 NL Penants a World Title, 1 Cy Young and the All time National League single season saves record.
vr, Xei
What is that fan upset at? If he's just booing without knowing much, that is kinda stupid.
If you were Kevin Towers, and the Dodgers offered you what you felt was the best pool of talent for Jake Peavy, would you pass on that offer and take a lesser offer just to not trade Peavy to L.A.?
It would be great to see him go into the hall of fame as a Dodger, but I don't really see that happening. I'd also like to see the Dodgers retire his number. Thoughts?
All time National League single season saves record
...tied with Gagne.
Piazza really will be the first test case to see if the Dodger policy is to only retire numbers of HOFers who are HOFers as Dodgers (besides Gilliam, of course).
Neither the Dodgers nor Piazza want to be humiliated like that, so it's not gonna happen.
Is there anything wrong with that, if indeed your perceptions were true?
vr, Xei
They wouldn't boo if there was a ceremony for him. It's one thing if he's on an opposing team, but Piazza will not get booed for that.
I would like to see the Dodgers move quickly to get their Piazza Day delivered before the Mets.
Fans long since waiting for the Reggie Jackson Orioles day will also have to wait for the Piazza Marlin ceremony.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B0018LX9P8/
Freshly baked terror!
Ok so I did some reseach to see if my memory was accurate with regards to what the Dodgers had offered and found this
http://tinyurl.com/634jl3
(hope that works)
Anyway according to the Daily News Piazza turned down a 6 year $85 Million deal with the dodgers, which I believe compares favorably (given the time value of money) to the 7 year 91 Millon that he ended up signing with the Mets. Also at that time Piazza canceled negotiations which led to him being traded, I didn't want to see Piazza go but given those circumstances I do not think that it is fair to put the majority of the blame on the front office.
It has to be easier to boo a player who is trying to beat you, but Piazza is no longer wearing the uniform of an opponent.
As far as Piazza getting booed, it was actually understandable. The Dodgers had offered Mike 84 mil/ 6year deal. Lozano, Piazza's agent, had let it be known that it would take a min. of 100mil to re-sign him and turned down the deal, which would have made Piazza the highest paid in the league. The Dodgers let him know that was their final offer and that they were gong to work on a trade. They even told Lozano that they were close to a deal with the Marlins but Lozano told Piazza that it was just a 'strong arm' tactic. Unfortunatly Lozano was wrong and Piazza was traded. I wouldn't have booed him but when he turned down the offer I didn't care if he was traded. It was pure ego on Piazza's and Lozano's part.
Best SI cover in quite some time BTW.
Juan Pierre was not happy with how he got the news about being moved out of left field. Does that mean that Ned Colletti has no people skills?
If you want to boo Piazza, fine. Just don't justify it with weak reasoning. It's a little hypocritical. Piazza did what he thought was best for him and the Dodgers did what they thought was best for them. If you want to boo him, fine, but it shouldn't be because he was trying to negotiate the best possible deal for himself. I'm sure you would have and probably have done that for yourself at some point.
Sorry for any Rule 7 violations.
http://tinyurl.com/43dee8
In all fairness, the same could be said about how DePo handled any of his business. Nobody wants to be told they are not needed any more. No matter how it's done.
http://have-you-met-ted.com/
Also, any search for The Big Bang Theory Blog understandably leads to ornery astronomy buffs arguing about the origins of space rather than the Penny-Leonard big moment. Go figure!
My larger point is that it's risky to draw a conclusion from isolated incidents that someone has no people skills.
There is no way fans are booing him on an appreciation day. If he's wearing an LA hat then people are going to have extremely short memories..on the other hand Give me one former Dodger (still playing) that people would actually cheer at Dodger Stadium without blinking an eye. This is one of the differences between the east coast/west coast baseball fan I think (or maybe just Dodger fans in general?).
Then it seemed Dodgers had to rub it in by signing K. Brown to $105 million, like, see we can spend that much.
128. I'd agree if it only happened once or twice. But it didn't, it happened a few times, more than it should have especialy when communication is one of the strongest traits a GM should have and Depo's were weak.
125 It's not weak reasoning, fans were mad that he signed a deal that wasn't for much more than the Dodgers offered. He never got the 100 mil deal that Lozano wanted. If he had gotten it fine and it would have showed that the Dodgers were low balling him. Instead he signs for what amounted to the same contract the Dodgers had offered and without the no trade he also said he wanted.
And just declaring that DePo had bad people skills, without actually offering evidence of it, isn't enough. The case you've made so far is much less than convincing. You've cited two examples, one of which has details that are disputed, the other of which involves a low-level front office employee that had no real effect on the team. You need a lot more than that to make a blanket statement.
I think in sports, people let their emotions cloud their judgement. It's really a results oriented business and I dont think executives should be evaluated based on their personality but on their body of work.
Baseball is still lagging behind because some organizations still place personality over performance, and thats when you get in-efficiencies. Dodgers would be an example of a team that has operated like this, and are hurting because of it.
People at Staples Center still boo Blake to this day, and yes I think they are stupid. Do I think they're lesser fans? No, because arguing over who's a bigger fan is itself stupid.
A agree with you. However, what should be is very different from what is. We live in the real world, and the fact is that everyone, baseball GMs included, is judged by those things to some degree. While I don't necessarily buy the fact that DePo had no people skills, one of the reasons, perhaps the main reason, he was fired is that Plaschke was able to convince certain people that DePo had no people skills. If DePodesta had been perceived as having people skills, it's pretty clear he would have received a longer leash and more time to finish the job he started.
1) we are in no real position to evaluate said skills, having never met him or any of the people he worked with, and having no idea what the morale was or wasn't under DePo, let alone who was responsible for it;
2) people-skills, like all intagibles, are in the eye of the beholder, but to the extent that they matter, they should show up in the overall results.
DePo's skills with the media are a matter for debate, but I always found him fairly open and decent in the interviews I heard. Perhaps that's not so, since I certainly didn't hear them all, or deal with him as a press person. Certainly I'm impressed with the fact that he's created a blog.
And yeah, I've got no problem with calling many of the fans who boo stupid. Well, stupid is kind of strong word, so let's give them the benefit of the doubt and call them thoughtless, as Jon did. What else are you supposed to call people who boo on every pickoff throw? Who boo a great Dodger like Shawn Green when he comes back to the stadium? Who boo even the umpiring decisions that are clearly correct? Who boo a great player like Jonathan Broxton when he has the rare bad game? Sure, they bought their ticket and they have the right to boo if they want to. But I also have the right to call them thoughtless jerks and simpletons.
I'm not philosphically opposed to booing, mind you. I think there are situations where it's defensible. But Dodger fans have no idea where to draw that line.
Maybe JoeyP and I can write long e-mails to each other like Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, to discuss the virtues of baseball executives in the same way Jefferson and Adams discussed ideal forms of governments, but for now, I would certainly like to turn the page.
There's that and never try to match wits with a Sicilian when death is on the line.
Assuming you can allow for fans to boo at any time, why is it so difficult to accept that many fans felt sighted by Piazza when he (by all accounts) essentially demanded the 1st $100 million contract in baseball and when he didn't get it in cut off all negotiations signally (to many observes) that he would go to the highest bidder. Given that this was a player who (most likely) would never have been drafted if not for Tommy, and later while tolling in the minors was talked out of retiring (or so the story went) by the organization. It does not seem unreasonable that many fans would feel a certain level of betrayal when Piazza seemingly showed no loyalty to the Dodgers, and felt a desire to express themselves.
That said I strongly feel that McCourt should have some sort of ceremony/event to recognize the career of a great former dodger, and I think it would go over very well with dodger fans.
Jon says it is unfair to draw inferences from one or two anecdotes, but those are just the anecdotes we have heard about, and McCourt would have had first hand knowledge of others of their kind, if there were any. And what are the anecdotes we know about? One is that in the Dodger offices when people tried talking to DePo face to face he told them to sends him e-mails instead. Now, I'm sorry, even though communicating via e-mail is still communicating, when you tell people something like that you are going to be branded as lacking people skills. And you are going to get called "Google Boy." No two ways about it. The other anecdote we have relates to DePo's behavio at the Dodgers' yearly "organizational meeting" the week before DePo was fired. That annual meeting is one where all the scouts and other behind-the scenes personnel who don't usually come to Dodger Stadium come together to be part of discussions on the state of the organization and talk about needs to be addressed in the off-season. It is a time when there is a lot of mingling and "pressing the flesh" going on, the kind of stuff that Billy Beane was depicted doing in Moneyball with high skill. Supposedly, McCourt noticed that DePo was being the proverbial wallflower at this event. DePo spoke to a total TWO people in a big room full of people he was supposed to be leading, and that really bothered McCourt, who went out of his way to talk to everybody -- sort of "rallying the troops" -- and expected DePo to be doing the same thing.
I don't think anybody here familiar with Dave Cameron at USS Mariner is going to call him Old School or hostile to the saber-types, He knows his sabermetrics, but he also has contacts in the baseball industry,and he said at USS Mariner one day, in the comments section of a post, that he had it on good authority that everybody in the Dodger organization hated working for DePo. He said that DePo just lacked what it takes to be the face of an organization and is better suited to be an assistant in the background. I don't disagree with that.
{slinks away}
There are some fields, advertising for one or any type of selling...that does require quite a bit of personality. But, the level of one's people skills would probably be reflected in their production anyways.
option 1 - work on this, or work around it.
option 2 - fire employee regardless of other possible positives.
isn't this like ignoring LaRoche's complete body of work and focusing on his lack of power during his call-up last year?
Frank must have too high of opinion of just how important baseball is.
The point you make is a good one...if we're talking about war and having good Generals that make decisions, lead, and increase morale.
However, in baseball there is nothing of that. In fact, Kevin Towers just the other day said he would want his clubhouse's morale to be low, bc their playing bad. Like 149 put it, this stuff is all intangibles and if you get caught hanging onto intangibles at the expense of things that actually matter, it'll kill your efficiency. This doesnt just apply to baseball, it applies to all corporate business.
Monticello3: JA did you see BO dbate HRC?
Braintree2: No watched AI!
Monticello3: What about Dancing?
Braintree2: Oh Kristi totally deserved that!
Monticello3: What about fiscal policy?
Braintree2: GTG JQA is here! :-)
167 Maybe Hamilton and Burr could have just texted each other.
AH10: What?
ABVP: I want a duel!
AH10: Duel what?
ABVP: Pistols at dawn?
AH10: Why?
ABVP: Hmmm... BRB
AH10: Dude, I'm sorry!
ABVP: Too late.
[GPS coordinates for Weehawken, NJ sent]
at the Wooden-Scully for the Kids event, but I want to
dress it up a little.
What we need here is a new post.
Criticize Chad Billingsley? That's a night in the box.
What could they do?
I hear the tapes of their respective "injuries" were submitted to the league offices, and mysteriously destroyed.
I cheered for Drew and Kent.
I sat on my hands and did nothing when Julio Lugo's name was announced.
Make sure it doesn't cover your GoldenPalace.com tatoo though.
Isn't there a secretary named Woods in the front office?
The thing is that in order to make trades or sign FA's a GM has to be able to communicate. Also in order for everyone under you to be on the same page communication is a must. You don't have to be great but you do have to at least be good at it. From all accounts Depo wasn't.
I don't understand why Dan Evans gets such a bad rap. When he took over he had no budget to work with, malone had already blown all the $$, so he did the best he could without raising the payroll. Add to that he was the one responsible for rebuilding the farm system. He brought in Logan White who in tern drafted Martin, Loney, LaRouche, Bills, Kemp and Kershaw. Before mccourt took over he had a deal worked out with Vlad. If I could buy the team the first thing I'd do is fire colletti and bring back Evans as Pres. and put in Kim as GM. Of course I'd also want a new manager and would see if Gibby was interested.
But I can't resist this one more comment just for the fun of it. What I said in 78 was: There are three basic skills and they are technical skills, conceptual skills, and people skills and they are usually learned and developed in that order. A GM should have all three and Depo did not.
Not that I was or wasn't referring to people skills mostly but it wasn't me that looked at the three skills I mentioned and picked out people skills as the skill Depo was missing.
It isn't that people don't have these skills because they do to some degree and I would think more so if they get promoted into higher positions. For a smart, high IQ person, technical skills are the first and easiest to obtain and people skills are usually slower to develop and may be even harder to develop if a person is very smart. They get things quicker and might have less patience with those that can't keep up.
Looking at this differently, some believe Jerry West was a lousy coach because he usually didn't have to spend time breaking down and practicing the basics, he just did them naturally and expected others to do so as well. How do you teach when you skip the learning process yourself.
A GM should be judged on based on resources available. Or more simply---ROI (return on investment), and ROA (return on assets). DePo didnt have many home grown assets, nor was the free agent budget such that you can judge his 2005 season the same way as other seasons.
You're taking the "bottomline" to literally. A GM's job is to allocate resources, asset management and acquisition. The W/L record does not always coincide perfectly with them.
194 - I assumed you only meant people skills, since that's the topic that usually comes up, and I didn't think you actually thought that DePo had no skills of any kind. The idea that DePo doesn't have technical or conceptual skills is so far off the map that it didn't occur to me it merited addressing.
2008: NL 4.58 AL 4.38
2007: NL 4.71 AL 4.9
2006: NL 4.76 AL 4.97
Stolen bases start to look good again.
The NL scores more RPG than the AL? Thats surprising. When was that last time the NL scored more runs per game than the AL in a season?
The teaser for this FoxSports.com story is:
"If Mike Piazza's numbers weren't Hall-worthy, Mike Vaccaro would vote him in for making New Yorkers care about the Mets again."
Now there's a standard of excellence!
Plus, don't teams usually score more runs in June, July, August as the temperature gets higher, allowing the ball to fly more?
I think it's simply the recognition that the stolen base, when used properly, can be a huge asset to any team's game.
I sure didn't. I fully expected a four team race to the wire, or at least three teams with the older San Diego fading in September.
Is home field advantage really that important?
I suspect in a couple of years (or months, if we're lucky), we'll hear how everybody thought Colletti's hairpiece smelled like Brylcream and nobody could stand being within four feet of him.
Small sample size means a lot when we're hashing out the alleged details behind any GM's firing. We don't exactly have a lot of facts to work with here.
Actually, the point was that this entire argument quickly takes on a heard-it-from-a-friend-who.. tone that makes it hard to sort fact from fiction. Which, probably, is why we have these assumptions and half-truths about every former GM and the reasons behind his firing.
For the record, I was always an Evans loyalist, still am in many ways, but the look-the-other-way Evans of the Mitchell Report was as disappointing as the LoDuca and Gagne revelations.
Now about Brandon Phillips....
http://home.istar.ca/~mbein/Baseball/MLR.JPG
And SB, (looks strongly anti-correlated)
http://home.istar.ca/~mbein/Baseball/MLSB.JPG
And no, I didn't make up that bit on Evans. I was told Evans was not a popular figure in LA. But I don't put a lot of stock in that information, just as I don't in the DePo party story. No offense intended.
I will be at the game tonight in the first row behind home plate. You better believe I will be representing and wearing my blue DT t-shirt. Look for me on TV!
And I really do appreciate you not discussing the results of the game as I am looking forward to watching it tonight.
LOL
When I have a rooting interest in the game I "work" from home, but no such luck this year.
Anyway, what I was trying to say, which wasn't really worth it anyway, is that...
Matt Kemp and James Loney are on pace to become the 26th and 27th players since World War II to finish a season with 100 RBI and fewer than 15 home runs. Kemp's on pace for 11 HR and 106 RBI, Loney 14 HR and 103 RBI.
Make sure to be on your cell phone and waving to the camera a lot.
Also make sure Ian Ziering doesn't steal your food.
The problem is that the human constructing the model thinks that he or she understands the phenomenon in question, and so cause and effect, but in no instance can that be said to be true.
And the "variance" is THE point. The laws of physics are the laws of physics, and so have predictive value, because those laws are grounded in local INVARIANCE principles, to wit, local invariance with respect to frames moving at a constant velocity, local translational invariance, local rotational invariance, and, lastly, local time-translational invariance.
And from the author of The Physics of Baseball:
"My widely read book, entitled 'The Physics of Baseball', dissects the game and reveals underappreciated or previously misunderstood information about the sport. It only follows that sabermatricians would co-opt my style and use a more data-oriented form of analysis to extract similar types of conclusions. But it is starting to get out of hand. All of you self-professed 'baseball analysts' who have jumped on the bandwagon recently where is the underlying physics behind your work? Why the messianic insistence in using VORP instead of the Principle of Inertia when predicting a pitcher's GB/FB ratio for 2007? Why do the 'new breed' of GMs hire number crunching statistical assistants none of whom can explain why a curveball curves, let alone why Barry Zito's is so effective instead of Ph.D.'s in fluid mechanics when they need advice on whether or not it is worth signing a journeyman pitcher to a four-year contract?
The scientific method is an indispensable tool when it comes to revealing the truth and beauty in the world we see around us. I owe my career to the scientific community that fostered my early career and allowed my work to flourish, to the Faradays and Helmholtzes and Chandrasekhars who elegantly and brilliantly showed all scientists how to perform great research. These lessons have been lost on the current crop of statistic-obsessed writers who have deviated down the path of accounting, rather than that of physics. Their never-ending number twiddling profoundly bores me, and introduces little that the great Branch Rickey didn't already bring to the game some sixty years ago. They race each other to be the first to invent a complex metric with a fancy-sounding acronym for a title, all while foregoing any discussion of the Stokes Drag Force law. In other words, they i