Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Winless Dodger lefty? I'll show you a winless Dodger lefty. From June 1988 to June 1989, Fernando Valenzuela went 19 starts between victories.
His last loss in the streak came the night before the Dodgers' 22-inning game in Houston. Mike Scott beat Valenzuela and the Dodgers, 1-0. From Jerry Crowe's game story in the Times:
In the left-hander's last 10 starts, the Dodgers have scored 20 runs, only 15 of them while Valenzuela was still in the game.
"As Happy could tell you," said Dodger Manager Tom Lasorda, motioning toward former Dodger pitcher Burt Hooton, a clubhouse visitor, "when your team isn't scoring runs for you, all you can do is keep working and keep working until they do."
Said Hooton, unsmilingly: "And cuss your hitters."
Mike Scioscia commented on the adjustments Valenzuela, who had an ERA of 4.75 during the streak, was making.
"He's a different pitcher than he was. I think he's learning what he's going to have to do, but he's been just a pleasure to catch and watch improve over the last couple of months.
"I said in spring training that you shouldn't judge him in the first month. He had to learn what to do. But he's kept us in every game."
Valenzuela no longer relies only on his fastball and screwball, instead mixing a wider variety of pitches, Scioscia said.
"He has more of a balanced attack," he said. "He has a couple of different breaking pitches, a couple of different screwballs and even a couple of different fastballs.
"And he's going to be able to change speeds better than he did before, which is phenomenal because he was tremendous at changing speeds.
For the remainder of his Dodger career, Valenzuela went 23-21 with a 3.99 ERA, including of course a no-hitter.
* * *
Commenter StolenMonkey86 noted Wednesday that the Fangraphs website offers a statistic on "out-of-zone swing percentage," which he comments might better measure a player's plate discipline and patience than pitches per plate appearance.
Through Monday:
20.26% Russell Martin
23.78% Rafael Furcal
25.87% James Loney
26.28% Andre Ethier
27.74% Jeff Kent
27.87% Blake DeWitt
29.19% Juan Pierre
33.65% Matt Kemp
* * *
At Bronx Banter, Alex Belth links to a 1989 clip of George Carlin talking baseball on Kiner's Korner.
Meanwhile, at Cardboard Gods, Josh Wilker finds Tommy John a bit dismissive of Pedro Martinez.
* * *
Your infield today: James Loney, Andy LaRoche, Angel Berroa, Russell Martin.
Today's lineup:
Pierre, LF
Kemp, CF
Martin, 3B
Loney, 1B
LaRoche, 2B
Young, RF
Berroa, SS
Ardoin, C
Kershaw, LHP
I was responding to the post about "going 5 years without ESPN"
I haven't seen Sportscenter in full in a very very long time, not sure exactly how long.
Generally, the only thing I watch on ESPN is actual sporting events, but there happen to be a lot of them.
I don't really need SC. Reports, I can go to rotoworld, yahoo sports, etc. Highlights, there's MLB.com, NBA.com, team websites, youtube, etc. Analysis, that's what we do here at Dodger Thoughts.
---
Will Kershaw get a win this year? The odds would have to favor him today, but Danks is pitching for the Sox. Danks is having a good year so far.
Navarro will likely be an AL All-Star this year.
He's 2nd in the AL in OPS at catcher (.835)----> Mauer is at .837
His overall line: .326/.379/.456
Too bad Ned sold him A.) for Hendrickson, and B) when his value was lowest.
BHSportsguy said its a reach to criticize Ned for trading Navarro..If we cant criticize trading a good young catcher for 1.5 season of Mark Hendrickson---> then what should Ned be criticized for? Thats about as bad as it gets.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Also, good lineup today.
I like LaRoche at 2nd, and Russ at 3b.
The eyesore remains Pierre at the top, but Torre doesnt get paid 4 mils to just sit there. He's an mlb manager. Its his job to make stupid decisions and give us fans something to talk about each game.
http://www.lacitybeat.com/cms/story/detail/but_what_of_juan_pierre/7161/
Whoo!
If anyone has a link to a good article about age/performance, that would be great too.
Thanks
I love this line-up (well at least 2-6) I think we're going to give Kershaw some good run support today.
Finally, Andy gets a look at 2B. Andy hits the ball hard today as the friendly competition between Andy and Blake heats up :)
Let's go Andy! Make Mr. Torre look like a genius!
vr, Xei
The commonly known old school reference point is a peak at age 28, obviously, that is a gross generality. There are early bloomers and late bloomers. It's more about the physical development of a person's body.
Look at Stluts as an example ... wonder what Kershaw will look like at age 28?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/unfiltered/?p=835
If you go to around page 55 of the Neyer/James Guide to Pitchers, there's a chapter that wraps up the screwball pretty nicely.
Sorry, I don't have a cite handy, but that's the punchline.
I don't think any Dodger has thrown a screwball since Fernando, at least not as a regular part of the repertoire. And while I'll defer to someone who has actually, you know, pitched, it doesn't sound right to me that the screwball has just been renamed the circle-change or 2-seam FB. The screwball requires a horrific outward torque on the elbow, as I recall.
Ramon Martinez is at Vegas - we could call him up!
I like this crazy line-up. Hope the defense doesn't let the Minotaur down.
vr, Xei
Those are Mellencamp-esque odds right there!
Not many will agree, but Ivan DeJesus Jr. This is ONLY if Furcal misses the rest of the year.
vr, Xei
Part of the reason that it seems like the peak is later is that and many HOFers are in the right tail (it's that sustained greatness that makes them HOFers) and we don't remember very many of the early flameouts, unless they were hugely hyped or ROYs or something like that. Moreover, all those guys like Stults whose peak is a first shot at the majors at age 27-28, and then disappear again are easy to forget, but just because their peaks are lower (AAAA), doesn't mean they happen at a different age than for most everyone else.
He's got no power, and maybe MLB pitcher would pound the K zone against him knowing he cant hurt them going deep---> but I have to think playing him now would be more beneficial to the Dodgers both now and for the future than Angel Berroa.
against RH batters: .270 .327 .450 .778
against LH batters: .284 .356 .455 .811
I always wonder how much skew ends up in a LHP starter vs. LHB split - given how much managers love to avoid starting their LHBs against LHPs, does it follow that LH starters face an inordinate percentage of LH batters that are simply really good hitters since those batters are the ones that stay in?
http://www.baseball-reference.com/games/standings.cgi?date=2005-09-27
http://dberri.wordpress.com/2007/04/21/it-aint-necessarily-so/
"[Bowling Green State University statistician Jim Albert] examined the productivity of hitters born over six decades, and found that Bill James's 1930s sample of players, for whatever reason, peaked at a younger average age than any before or since.
Players born in the:
1910s - 28.0 peak
1920s - 28.6
1930s - 27.1
1940s - 28.9
1950s - 28.7
1960s - 29.8
It's fair to say then, that most players through history have peaked closer to age 29 than 27."
I wonder why baseball players peak later than other athletes? Maybe it takes more years for the eyes to adjust to a speeding baseball.
Not sure if you're just being silly, but maybe baseball takes both athletic ability AND hand-eye experience, to finally get a feel for it, which happens at a later age.
Han Ram hits one out to break it up.
YESSSSSSSSSSS!!!
Well they aren't much of anything, since his comment about athletic ability is nonsensical. If I were him I would have simply said that baseball is less stressful on the body.
I think regfairfield's point about the effects of age athleticism is right on target. And, yet again, I wish you'd aim for a little more civility in your comments.
plate appearances. That's a grand total of 12 players in the major leagues who are 22 and younger.
Ivan De Jesus, Jr. just turned 21 in May and it would be a really bad idea for him to be promoted this year and maybe even next year.
The amount of energy someone needs to exert to play baseball isn't as high as something like basketball or soccer. Players don't have to be fast or agile or strong to be good at baseball. Players have to have certain attributes, like reaction time, to be good, but is reaction time an "athletic" trait?
pretty good typing skills for a 2 1/2 yr.old.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedailymirror/2008/06/bonds-slams-the.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzWJULZ5sjg
A new BH90210? Gack.
Baseball is far more of a craft than a talent. Athletic ability has much to do with it for sure but, a certain amount of mental maturity and repetition is required to really succeed at the top (major league) level. Hence, the "schooling" (can you tell I'm from the south?) that goes on thru an average of 5 levels of minor leagues. This is likely the reason for the later peak in age with regards to production.
Sorry.
Anyway...
Go Clayton!
Either way, bringing athletic ability into it still has no place in a discussion of peak-performance-age among various sports.
Yes, baseball does not require the body stress of other sports (as I mentioned), but that does NOT explain why the peak batting age is 29 instead of 22. It may explain why the peak age of a running back is not 29. But we already knew that.
But, um, it's not like they're remaking Casablanca.
Tee hee.
Bummer, Clayton had him 0-2, too. Waste a pitch, kid.
The ball was in Pierre's glove before the runner even touched 3rd base. Pierre was in relatively shallow left field.
Pierre double clutched and then made a pathetic throw that has to be cut off without a play at the plate. Anyone else throws him out or the runner is held.
You want to get upset at Ned about the signing fine but when the game starts and he does his thing, at least acknowledge it.
BTW, Toby Hall's splits against lefthander pitching.
.407/.429/.556
Its a small sample but still.
From Gurnick:
http://tinyurl.com/4le6ql
Dodgers to go to six-man rotation
(Torre) said a sixth starter would allow an extra day of rest for hard-throwers Kershaw and Chad Billingsley, as well as pitcher Hiroki Kuroda, who is expected to return from the disabled list to the rotation next week. Torre said the idea stems from the fact that the Dodgers play 20 consecutive days leading to the All-Star break. When Kuroda returns to the rotation, Chan Ho Park will return to long relief.
Torre said the rotation would be re-evaluated for the resumption of play after the break, depending in part on the uncertain return of Brad Penny from the disabled list.
Thanks for the suggestions.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.