Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
I'm looking forward to watching Laroche build on his excellent PH at bat last game.
And Pee Wee is in, and his at bats excite me almost as much as the Bison's.
Bulldogs up 8-6. The Bulldogs blew a 5-0 lead.
It certainly ranks below wearing the blue jerseys.
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/baseball/playbyplay?gameId=2817602781
I like your thoughts on PW Lex, I like how when pitchers pitch him outside he takes the ball that way if pitchers come in on him he pulls it & when they throw it down the middle well the ball might end up half way up the bleachers.
http://ncaasports.cstv.com/gametracker/launch/gt_mbasebl.html?event=678634&school=ncaa&sport=mbasebl&camefrom=&startschool=&
http://tinyurl.com/4dxydt
It's a little balky. Especially when it gets to the end of the game.
Konerko 284
Karros 284
http://tinyurl.com/3vy5um
Hershiser has that IT as a broadcaster imo.
apparently they are SABR clones of some kind.
Dunn Sterling all over again! (bad, bad Clippers joke)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=a-GgbP9C9Zk
Clicks...
Yup!
Since the Dodgers don't play outside the NL much, my AL awareness is basically confined to bits and pieces of Red Sox, Yankees and Angels, also Tigers a bit, as they get most exposure on ESPN, post-season, etc. As the Dodgers gradually work their way around interleague play (so just 2 seasons for me), I occasionally glean the odd smattering - A's whatever. I claim complete ignorance of the Texas Rangers, for example, aside from Gagne's short time there. I'm not in a big hurry to learn more about them just yet, either. ;-)
If you want to fit in with the hip DT crowd, you need to know who all the Rays players are.
Kemp
Kent
Martin
Loney
LaRoche
Young
Berroa
Lowe
Pierre
The run and switch and when nobody is looking.
In August, I'm going to go see the Rangers play the Orioles.
I'll take pictures to help you out.
I just checked Baseball-Reference.com & apparently Mookie Wilson was the Juan Pierre of that era except Mookie had some pop hitting as many as 10 one year.
Mookie's best OBP year was 1987 when he had a whopping 359 OB% his worst was 1991 with a 277 OBP.
"You know what I like about Juan Pierre? Everything."
The other announcers reply:
"I agree."
I'm guessing that the first announcer was Ken Harrelson and the second was Darrin Jackson.
But I'm not posting it here!
I was like dang man...
This would presume that I had any appreciable skill at basketball.
I don't really have any appreciable athletic skills at anything.
If you can make one heap of all your winnings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your beginnings
And never breathe a word about your loss . . .
A 15 second at bat!
I'm shorter then both. I'm more in the David Eckstein mold.
my buddy Frank though, his brother is 6'7 6'7!!
The Bulldogs are up by a TD and a PAT.
Check that, I forgot who was pitching on the Dodgers.
This game is just so fantastic.
You should have tried watching some of the early round games between UCLA and Fullerton.
Those were excruciatingly long.
Broxton weighs more than twice as much as I do. That's one hefty dude.
---
Goodness, the White Sox are trying to get the Dodgers back into the game!
Out of which leg?
I don't like WGN's promotion style so I'm kind of on strike against them.
Is the game on WGN too? I wish I had that channel here.
Sherrill saves it! Strikes out the side!!!!
Now back to the Dodgers game.
Now to the bench with you!
(yes)
"Why can't we use THIS guy in left field or 2B?"
Nahh... it's too obvious, isn't it?
Circle whichever one you'd like.
Ethier sits vs lefties.
Juan vs righties.
Pee Wee everyday.
AJ cant throw anyone out.
Just kidding, Shimmin.
Pee Wee!!
(I was on the phone when he hit his dinger.)
Now if only the rest of the offense could come alive. Otherwise another good starting pitching performance wasted.
But...
Pee Wee!
My new nickname for Pierre will be "The Tyrant".
>>Third baseman Blake DeWitt, who was the NL Rookie of the Month in May, has had a horrid June thus far, hitting just .185 with no runs batted in so far this month.
Manager Joe Torre said a large reason for that is that DeWitt has not been using the opposite field, something he did so well during the first two months of the season.
"Right now, he has absolutely no patience at the plate," Torre said. "He's swinging as soon as the ball comes out of the pitchers hand."<<
I'd like to see if that is accurate.
We'll take that infield hit to bring Pee Wee up.
Well, this is quite a pitcher's duel. Not much more to say than that.
Mark buehrle's pitches look nice a juicy...
Did we decide on a moniker for Andy LaRoche? I'd go with "the Kid" or "the Karate Kid" based on his at bat song.
Pierre on the year, at 3.81, up from 3.41 last year. Similar swing percentage.
Kent is slightly down to 3.39 from 3.46 last year. His swing percentage is up from 46.8% to 51.2%.
March and April: 3.8
May: 3.99
June: 3.7
how does "La Solucion" sound? it's spanish for "The Solution" knowing La Roche's dad was half mexican & all.
Frack.
Guess the game's over now. :-/
Thanks guys.
I mean the Rockies and Padres will land on the schedule eventually, but still, this is something else.
Ah well. Bummer.
And Andy Kaufman's coming out of the bullpen!
I mean, they aren't good or anything, but they're comfortably average.
Yep, I am back to "not minding Ned Colletti's re-assignment."
So.
Anyway.
What else is on TV?
I keep seeing this. I get why it's being said, but considering that the Reds have basically the same record as us, why should we be snobbish? They all count. I don't see the teams beating us throwing those back.
I'm sure there is criticism, but not in the right direction. I.e. why criticize kids when there are plenty of awful signings that are ripe for the taking (including all of Jason Ungar's last post)?
{sigh}
By fans and media, I meant the non-DT crowd.
At some point, regardless of who is on the DL and who is not playing well, this core group is going to have to start stringing together some good games instead of just showing flashes of what they might turn out to be.
Now, that might not be this year but eventually either they start doing it or you look elsewhere.
We disparately need Furcal back he's our only hope.
Okay, Sweeney, you're done.
At least until tomorrow night when you're dragged back out to strike out again.
219 Furcal = Obi Wan.
Pitching's good, bullpen is good, young players are good, and the team is performing under win expectancy. There is a lot to like.
They just don't have enough pop. Like the past ten years.
I tend to agree. Basically I look at the Reds the way I see the Padres, but in reverse.
The Padres beat the Dodgers quite a bit. Does that definitively mean the Padres are that much better than the Dodgers? Not really. So how they play against SD or CIN doesn't reflect the Dodgers on the whole.
But more than that, I think the Fox era hurt more than anything because that's where the Dodgers lost their way and McCourt still hasn't figured it out yet.
I think there is a feeling that the Dodgers are trying to rediscover who they are as an organization. And so most people cut them some slack. Comparing them to the Lakers really isn't fair because the Lakers' leadership has remained consistent and maintained a philosophy. Plus, it's easier to rebuild/reload in basketball than it is in baseball.
If we had real players around these younger folks that produced then maybe these kids wouldn't feel as if they had to carry the team. They all can see that our leadoff hitter and 3 hole hitting veteran can get it done to take off some pressure. And with all the talk allowed in the media about how we will be a good team once the calvary returns no wonder they are pressing. But of course they are pros and should be better than that.
You just replace the one hitter with anyone who can get on base above .295 and our 3/4 hitters with a couple of good solid consistent bats and were a good team.
THat would hurt.
It's not like losing a point guard in basketball or a running back in football, it's one guy who gets 5-6 PAs per game.
1. Billy Grabarkewitz (1969) -- .092 (6 for 65)
2. Mark Sweeney (2008) -- .103 (6 for 58)
3. Milt Thompson (1996) -- .118 (6 for 51)
Can he do it?
(Adapted from a prior posting)
You're right, though.
Tomorrow we'll get to see the rest of the Sox rotation and give it another go! There's still two more games left vs Chicago.
...but is everybody else here off partying like it's 1959?
Well, things have gotten bad and things have gotten worse, but I already know the tune.
Man, I don't want to get stuck in Lodi.
He also has an opinion, which bothers me.
To be fair, there's no way he's genuinely a .100 hitter. Small sample size alert.
Things are rough enough without saying that basically, we haven't won a series in ages, when we have. Saying "the Reds series don't count" strikes me as going out of one's way to be negative.
He got you the W didn't he, geez!!
Furcal is not the difference between winning the World Series and being the Marlins. And if he is, then this team is seriously flawed.
If the Dodgers were as good as the Marlins this year, I'd be very happy.
Yeah. It's just been a rough month. You add up the Dodgers and Lakers month together, and it's a whole lot of hurt. Even the best teams will have rough months, and best of all, there's still three entire months to go after June.
Hopefully after this month the Dodgers will re-enact Tolstoy's final novel, "Resurrection."
not to mentioned Furcal.
Mike Piazza's don't grow on trees OB12 but I hear ya. & when they do Newscorp. sells them away.
Dodgers' record vs. White Sox in 1959: 4-2
Dodgers' record vs. White Sox since 1959: 1-6
I don't happen to think that benching Pierre for Young or cutting Sweeney will have a grand effect on the fortunes of the team. But it's okay to want the incremental improvement that those moves might provide. It's okay to believe that the Dodgers are being too patient with Sweeney. It's okay to still be upset with the Pierre signing and not buy Ned's reasons for it. (As long as you don't violate rule 8!)
Now, going the other way, it is worth pointing out that when the lineup is 8/9ths what you'd want it to be (given who is healthy), that maybe the complaining when the team loses should be a bit more muted. By and large, the kids are playing, and Ned is living and dying with them like the rest of us.
Good Russian novels and Good Chinese movies ALL have sad ending :)
Have good at-bats, yes. But look at strike one, foul off strike two...What are you supposed to do?
Seeing a lot of pitches is also contingent on the pitcher throwing balls that are not strikes. 95 pitches, 65 strikes tonight.
68% strikes is no joke.
It sucks that the Dodgers have faced Cliff Lee, C.C. Sabathia and Mark Buerhle in 3 of their 4 most recent losses.
It sucks even more that of the next 5 projected opposing pitchers, 4 of them have ERAs lower than 3.5.
Good movie. Agreed. very sad ending
I hope they don't get swept in back-to-back series.
And as Brock said, tonight's pitcher pitched a hell of a game, threw strikes all night, and as Sporky said, tough pitchers in this stretch, for a lineup that struggles to be consistent, well, what can you do.
I really do have faith the Dodgers will turn it around next month. Maybe it'll be fruitless, but, I do really believe that.
http://scores.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=280624119
The homer is credited to Delmon Young and it links to his profile.
A new tranlation of War and Peace by Pevear and Volokhonsky -- I think is very good.
They did a much better translation of Anna Karenina several years ago that won several awards.
Both of these translations make the books easy to read. provide better inter-action between the characters, and better scenic background.
I got my 17 year old son to start reading Anna Karenina earlier this year and was liking it. However he stopped the very minute his English teacher told him is was one of here favorite books. He really disliked this teacher!
Too many kids (especially boys) start to loss interest in reading.
I deserve it.
My first pick was Slaughterhouse Five. And the AP English teacher threw a hissy fit because it was her book and OMG I so want to teach that next year!
In retrospect, I should have picked Huckleberry Finn.
I'm overstating, but not by much.
Until then, by the book, baby.
306 Confederacy of Dunces? Now that's a book I'd teach to children!
The clocks at my workplace are remarkable in that no two clocks there ever show the right time. It's as if the library was a collection of wormholes that people passed through putting them into different realities.
Which could explain a lot.
It bookends nicely with Joe Torre saying that they need to have more patient at bats.
Talk about a Confederacy of Dunces.
Repko continues to heat up, too.
End of rant.
..you just had that feeling that maybe Lowe was (once again) given a bit too much rope.
Also found out I got tix for tomorrow as well..gonna break out of my personal slump.
- - - - - - -
"A popular high school English teacher in Tuscola in west-central Texas has been placed on paid leave and faces possible criminal charges ... The teacher, Kaleb Tierce, 25, is being investigated for distributing harmful material to a minor after the student selected and read 'Child of God' by the Pulitzer Prize-winning novelist Cormac McCarthy."
So, yeah. It's good.
The sign that the apocalypse is indeed upon us..
317/320 - What Eric said. I will say too that you should give it a few episodes to both sink in and to hit its stride. That's pretty much true for each of its seasons. I have Season 1 and Season 4 as my favorites. But they're all great.
People can be so stupid.
It is my favorite show, ever.
There is a moment in Season One that I might put up there as one of the most gut-wrenching things I have ever seen in any medium, including Rorschach's fate at the end of Watchmen, and the entire final chapter of Thomas Pynchon's Mason and Dixon.
--
"One of the sad things about contemporary journalism is that it actually matters very little. The world now is almost inured to the power of journalism. The best journalism would manage to outrage people. And people are less and less inclined to outrage." - Simon
"It occurred to me, having written a couple of 600-page tomes, that if you want to say something intricate about something as disorganized, confused, and interconnected as an American city, you want to stay for the whole season on a single story." - Simon
Be patient with it...Treat it like Mr. Kershaw..
I have tickets to 4th of July game in SF.
If the Dodgers are ahead of the Giants I will convert.
Give me three indispensable books that won't get anybody fired.
Whether you convert or not, if you decide you want DT folks with you let me know, I am starting to see what is available. Went to the game last year...louis99@wans.net
In an earlier post both Jon and underdog referenced the important point about"incremental" change, and how it has been lacking.
What I find equally frustrating is any sense at times of urgency not panic in some of the Dodger lineups. I can't say definitely the Dodgers would have won all of the games, but certainly on many of the Sunday games where Kent was rested Mazza played instead of either LaRoche or Young, a few more starts for Young and maybe we win 1 or 2 of those games and maybe we are 1 or 2 games closer to Arizona.
How about a little Orwell, "1984." Or Fahrenheit 451. Or Slaughterhouse 5.
To Kill a Mockingbird.
100 Years of Solitude.
Catch-22. (Er, that may be found subversive by some people in West Central Texas, though.)
Song of Solomon.
The Plague.
AP Euro reads The Plague.
1984--Orwell
Darkness at Noon--Kesstler
Cannery Row--Steinbeck
alternate:
Man in the High Castle--Philip K. Dick
If I taught HS I wouldn't let a kid read Child of God unless his parents were on board; that guy should have steered him to All the Pretty Horses or something.
In retrospect, I'm amazed no one made a fuss about him.
I'm legitimately asking.
293
Thank You.
Tonight:
0-3 BA .200 Berroa
0-2 BA .167 Lowe
0-1 BA .103 Sweeney
0-4 BA .280 Pierre (0 home runs in over two seasons)
AB 3, R 1, H 1, RBI 1, BA .286 (Home Run) Young
Move over old Tyrant, Young is moving in.
Does batting practice ever consist of them hitting off of pitches thrown by guys on the pitching roster, in a game-simulation of the mix and speed of pitches they'll actually see, or is it just hitting easy pitches as they do the pre-game practice on the field?
Batters just take beeps to loosen up before the game.
>> The Dodgers infielder has missed 53 games with a strained left calf but recently cut in half the 10 days he was prescribed to take off by his physical therapist in Boston and is getting closer to a rehab assignment. <<
http://tinyurl.com/5za8jw
And ultimately the nation would have been reunited anyways.
MAJOR depression. :) but OK
Darkness at Noon
Lord of the Flies
Angle of Repose
Fear and Loathing (OK, that one'll get you fired)
Cuckoo's Nest (maybe that one too)
Mockingbird
Grapes of Wrath
Of Mice and Men
Jane Eyre (I loved, loved, loved this in high school. But I was a weird kid.)
In Cold Blood
Barrio Boy (Galarza)
Old Man and the Sea
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
All the Pretty Horses
The Known World
350
So wouldn't it make sense to have something like a game situation batting practice, especially when some of the hitting issues seem to be related to plate discipline? I thinking Kemp and DeWitt would benefit from this. Couldn't hurt, right?
Of course, it might make sense for a team to keep a washed-up pitcher like Tomko or Loaiza around for exactly that purpose -- somebody who's not on the roster, but is hired to serve as a near-major-league-caliber batting practice pitcher.
Probably not many people would want the job though.
--
I'm in favor of anything Steinbeck. I've even been to the Steinbeck Museum in Salinas. (No really, it's a cool place.)
--
Okay, night all.
Oh boy! Sleep! That's when I'm a Viking!
I s'pose they read Gatsby at some point?
Then my Uncle Tom's Cabin malfeasance may be forgiven.
I can only hope.
The fact that English teachers won't coordinate the rest of their reading with the History teachers pisses me off to no end.
I was thinking the same thing.
On Dodger Talk they were talking about how tough it is for Sweeney since he gets so few ABs. Something like this could help him too. I have no doubt he does better than .100 against a pitching machine. I'm guessing it's more of a reaction time issue for him.
There doesn't seem to be any chance of roster changes on the horizon given what Torre, Colleti and McCourt have said recently, which leaves only two options for improving the offence: waiting for the slumps to end or changing the training. I think they need to think outside the box here and quick.
Because your positions are the result of careful consideration and your ideas are sound? I agree with most of the ideas that you share. In this particular instance, it's just a matter of a different approach.
Another way to make the offense more powerful, would be to identify all of the players that have averaged 20 home runs or more over the past two seasons who are before their thirtieth birthday and find a way to aquire three to five of these players and lock them up for three years.
Loney could be such a player as could Kemp, LaRoche, and Young.
jus say'in
We read The French Lieutenant's Woman, A Separate Peace, As I Lay Dying (hated, hated, hated it!).
If you get to the 30s, Dreiser or dos Passos, maybe?
Torre and Colleti have basically said they're going to stay the course with the current roster. Are you talking about 2009?
Get up there and spray the ball around, get your back and trunk loose, and play ball.
i'm guessing it's more of a reaction time issue with him
I agree, Sweeney has been doing this PH gig for a long time. What's really changed for him? Maybe he just doesn't see/react to the ball as he was once able to. Time marches on.
For the young guys, a tremendous emphasis has been put on "seeing" more pitches. Maybe they are thinking more about what they are doing and reacting less than they need to? This is a conundrum, because they need to learn to do this, so that it is second nature and they are no longer thinking, but just reacting when they are implementing these strategies at the plate.
Often, it's a difficult process for us to observe. Torre is committed to it and he should be, for the players that he wants to retain will then "know how to win".
The days of 38 year old productive players largely went out with the reopened CBA.
Now, somebody just needs to tell Nomar.
That's what they're saying today. Let's see what actions they will take after the All-Star break when some of the answers to the "ifs" are known. "If" Jones can hit close to his career average. "If" Furcal can play for a sustained period of time and be productive again. "If" Penny can regain his form.
I would really be surprised "if" McCourt will allow the rest of the season to be played in the fashion that it has been since Furcal went down, to date.
Other than Psycho
Or Planet of the Apes
Think about that. Off to bed.
371.
I agree there would be a lot of resistance to doing something like this, and that for the young guys it is a "seeing more pitches" issue. I know that they study video of the pitchers they're up against (not sure about the Dodgers, but I've heard players on other teams talk about this) but something tells me that's just not the same as getting up to the plate and watching the pall come at you, and deciding if, when and where to swing. Clearly it's not a replacement for a traditional BP.
I'm just wondering if there's a way to do that same thing outside of a real game. Another plus might be some added info for the managers in that it might help in roster decision making.
Right now it goes kind of like this:
"You" are the player.
Mr. Torre, or one of his associates has informed you of what he expects from you.
On a regular basis, you are reminded of these goals.
Mr. Torre is continuoulsy observing everyting that you do. He is interested in your actions on and off the field, but mostly on the field. So, in the practice of batting, fielding, running , even resting, he is always watching, always listening. Mr. Torre believes that everything that you do that is associated with a Dodgers uniform is a reflection of him. In a way he feels that you are an extention of him and Mr. Torre takes a lot of pride in what he does. Mr. Torre thinks that he is the best and even if he's not, he is paid the best of any MLB manager, so don't get any funny ideas.
If you are fortunate enough to get some PT, you have noticed that he is constantly perched on the dugout steps, arms resting on the rail, chin often resting on the arms, eyes relentlessly watching ... you. Occasionally Mr. Torre makes a comment to his associate Bob, the Bench Coach, who always seems to be next to Mr. Torre's left shoulder, waiting to receive a shared thought. Will you play? Will you stay? It's all up to Mr. Torre. No pressure on you to produce or anything.
Mildred Pierce
The Long Goodbye
Nick Johnson delivered the epitaph for his 2008 season by text message. "I need surgery on my wrist," he wrote to teammate Paul Lo Duca. Lo Duca responded much like others yesterday in the Washington Nationals' clubhouse when they learned that Johnson, their first baseman and regular No. 4 hitter, will miss the rest of the season while recovering from a right wrist injury. "Dude, you need to talk to my pharmacist first," Lo Duca wrote back.
(Confession: I may have changed part of that. It's early; I can't remember details.)
How many days till Juan Pierre is off this team?
740 more days would be a time around the All-Star break two years from now :)
http://sportsblogs.latimes.com/sports_baseball_dodgers/2008/06/at-the-risk-of.html#more
Torre saying after game yesterday:
Hitters need to make the pitcher work.
Pierre and Kent get it and Martin gets it sometime.
Team watches video if haven't seen a pitcher before.
In Majors, pitchers like Buehrle don't have throw a fastball on a 2-0 count.
If the pitcher is throwing strikes, make sure you have a plan with your atbat.
Know what the pitchers throws and look for the type of pitch you want to hit and don't go up there just reacting to whatever he throws.
Loney hit first pitch really hard but still hit into double play--team needs to make the pitcher work. (a contradiction? pitcher throwing strikes and Loney perhaps looking for a particular pitch according to his plan for that at bat)
Sounds like Torre and Colletti are making contingency plans if team still not doing well after Jones, Furcal, Nomar, Penny, Kuroda return so that they will be ready to do something before the July 31 trading deadline.
very well.
How about some of the muckraker stuff? Upton Sinclair, perhaps? A little Jungle would offer the opportunity to teach some historical lessons. It would also give you an excuse to show "There Will Be Blood" in class.
I suppose Norman Mailer would get you fired.
I second (third? eleventh?) the Hemingway ideas. Always liked "For Whom The Bell Tolls, in addition to those already mentioned."
In his last 10 innings he has 18 K's and has given up only 5 hits.
I loved going to that class every day. I never laughed so hard in a classroom setting, and this was a place where we took "comma" tests.
Kent gets it. He gets the plan.
Career Avg. Numbers:
BA .289, OBP .355, SLG .502, OPS 123
2008 Season to Date:
BA .255, OBP .293, SLG .413, OPS 82
Do the Dodgers need to own a tv station like the Yankees and the Red Sox to make this plan work better?
393
Jones is in his prime years too!
The Jungle was an eye opener for me and the start of my questioning everything. Luckily for me, my 9th grade English Teacher gave it to me to read since I was always reading in her class. She decided if I was going to ignore her English lessons at least she'd give me a good book to read. Upto that point I'd only been reading SF books.
She was also the one who followed that up with Johnny Got His Gun. Plus she was hot, like Van Halen teacher hot.
"Your humble correspondent and blog host (that would be me) is a firm believer in the Joe Torre approach to hitting, the idea that you make an opposing pitcher work as much as possible, throw as many pitches as possible and that you go to the plate with an idea of exactly what you want to do. The proof is in the pudding -- and in the four World Series and six A.L. pennants Torre's Yankees teams won by taking that approach."
"But you have to remember, those were VETERAN teams. This is a young team. And it's just possible that they aren't ready to take on this cerebral approach to the game just yet. Not that they won't ever be. But let's put it this way: this approach has been preached to them since Day One of spring training, and it obviously still hasn't caught on with any consistency -- and because these guys are so young, it might not catch on anytime soon ,either (read: anytime in 2008). These guys are still at a stage of their careers where they would prefer to keep things as simple as possible, and Torre's way is definitely not simple."
Gotta go with these guys, they're the only ones that understand the plan.
Maybe they should be turned into coaches?
I'm glad they're at least waiting for DeWitt's steroids to wear off before they send him back home to AA. A banned solution showing up on the MiLB drug test would be the last thing Ned needs right now.
Martin - .849
Ethier - .809
Kent - .790
Loney - .754
Kemp - .742
DeWitt - .735
Pierre - .721
I had a 9th grade English teacher like that. The hot part.
I spent the whole year looking at my feet when I had to talked to her.
Otherwise I would have exploded.
Second, Kent made a clearer point than Jackson is making. The problem isn't (necessarily) that young guys can't wait for their pitch. The problem is that they are getting contradictory advice (take pitches vs. swing at good pitches). As Kent said, if a pitcher throws first-pitch strikes right down the middle, that might be the best pitch you'll see, and swinging early is the same thing as swinging at a good pitch to hit.
If youth (read, inexperience) matters, I'd guess it matters in two ways. First, their pitch-recognition skills are not that well developed. This seems clearest with Kemp. It doesn't matter how patient you are - if you can't tell a strike from a ball, you're in trouble. Second, maybe (this is just speculation) young guys see strikes early, whereas vets with proven success see more nibbling.
How often does A-Rod look at 2 strikes? Rarely, I bet. I bet he swings at early strikes or else starts counts 2-0.
The confusion, as I see it, is that Jackson and others (maybe even some of the coaches and players) equate "patience" with "taking pitches, whether they're hittable or not."
Sure, any kind of pitch-taking will help to wear out the opposing pitcher (pitches is pitches for him), but if those pitches are called strikes, you're not going to have a lot of success against him starting every count 0-2.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.