Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Without a no-hitter since Hideo Nomo's at Colorado on September 17, 1996 - 11 years and 9 1/2 months ago - the Dodgers are in their longest no-hit drought since they went 11 years and 11 1/2 months between no-hitters by Dazzy Vance (September 13, 1925) and Fred Frankhouse (August 27, 1937).
Vance's no-hitter came 17 years and eight days after Nap Rucker's on September 5, 1908.
Today is the 18th anniversary of Fernando Valenzuela's sombrero-tosser ...
* * *
Season stats:
Chin-Lung Hu: .224 on-base percentage, .206 slugging percentage, 14 OPS+
Angel Berroa: .242 on-base percentage, .211 slugging percentage, 20 OPS+
Today's game could be the tipping point of a very shallow cup.
Hu, by the way, has only 12 plate appearances in Las Vegas since his demotion and hasn't played since June 13.
* * *
Back in my heyday, if there was a communication gap between someone older and someone younger, the assumption was the older guy was to blame. Simers seems to be saying that by advocating Mattingly join the team full time. Mattingly's really cool. He wears sandals and love beads, he likes the Beatles, and his favorite word is "relevant."
P.S. I was surprised by the negative reaction some had to the Dodgers' winning without a hit. Me, I loved it. I found myself actually hoping they wouldn't get a hit in their last couple of innings. Shades of 2003, except I seriously doubt the offense will be 2003 bad the whole season.
Linescore:
Cubs 0 0 1
D's 1 1 0
Yesterday was so 2008 for the Dodgers. They have lost 9 of their last 16 yet have climbed to within 2 1/2 games of 1st in the NL West. One almost gets the feeling they could lose 3 straight yet somehow move closer in the division. Sort of like not getting a hit yet somehow winning the game.
Just absolutely insane.
A couple of games ago, underdog was willing to offer his kingdom for a bloop hit. Keep the cats, dog, who needs a hit.
Really surprised at the negativity of some of the comments. Jeez.
You must be on a really long flight.
was it an unusual way to win, of course...but they did
if Torre pulled a pitcher with a no-hitter at the same junction, he'd be crucified...but Scioscia gets a pass...
the old double standard at work, McCourt/Coletti/Torre bad, Moreno/Scioscia good
this is a kind of win that can turn a season around and light a fire under the team...and then again, its only one game, and we are still relying on washed up veterans to pull us along (IMHO)
You do know that Derek Lowe has thrown a no-hitter before?
I'm pretty sure Scioscia didn't get criticized because it was a no-brainer to pinch-hit for Weaver in the 7th. Has there really been a lot of Torre criticism in the mainstream media?
I just pitched a complete game to add to my spelling woes.
Torre might not have been criticized as heavily as you think if he'd pulled his no-hitting pitcher. It's part of the NL game -- most people understand that. If your team is losing 1-0, you need hits. Plus it's not as if the Angels or Dodgers bullpens are weak. The manager's job is to win the game. Scioscia's move really can't be questioned on the merits. Any manager who let his pitcher bat in that circumstance would have been rightly criticized.
The not-going-deep-into-games argument doesn't really hold any water either, given that we have Broxton and Saito at the back of the bullpen.
I liken the prediction that the Dodgers won't get any more no-hitters to Early Wynn. When Wynn won his 300th game in 1963, many people (including Wynn himself) opined loudly that nobody would ever win 300 games again. That he would be the last one ever. Then Gaylord Perry did it, and everyone said he would be the last one. Then Steve Carlton, and everyone said he would be the last one. Then Seaver, Niekro, Sutton, Ryan, Clemens, Maddux, Glavine. Now everyone says Glavine will be the last one. He won't. And the Dodgers will also pitch a no-hitter soon enough.
Oh, but if we need to sacrifice Simers or Plaschke to a volcano at some point, I'm all for it.
But what are you all doing here? Super EuroCup game on right now.
.696 veteran clean up mans OPS.
General Manager Ned Colletti is under fire, though, and Manager Joe Torre said again, "it's still a work in progress" getting through to the team's young players.
--
You have a hard time getting thru to me when you insult them in the press and then surround then with garbage. And I'm Kent's age.
Juan Pierre will be everyday LF even AFTER Andruw Jones returns.
Torre just told us this morning, although he said Rafael Furcal would probably go back into the leadoff spot when he comes back, with Pierre dropping to second.
``(Pierre) has been that consistent guy for us every day, and he refuses to acknowledge any bumps or bruises, even though you know he has them,'' Torre said. ``He has been great. Juan is going to be our left fielder, and Andruw will be our center fielder.''
That means, of course, that Andre Ethier and Matt Kemp will compete for playing time in RF. Although Torre wouldn't acknowledge that was part of the plan, it is apparent that those two benefitted from pushing each other early in the season. Ned Colletti is a big proponent in the value of having players compete, his thinking being that it brings out the best in the players doing the competing.
This morning's other news is that Chan Ho Park is out of the rotation. It isn't that Joe is backing off on his plan to go with a six-man rotation. It's just that it won't start until Brad Penny comes off the DL, probably on Saturday at San Francisco, when he is tentatively slated to pitch UNLESS he suffers some sort of setback in his simulated game on Tuesday at Houston. Yes, Chan Ho has had two really good starts in a row. But they weren't going to go with seven starters, so somebody was going to have to go sometime, and Joe wants Chan Ho as a long reliever, a role he has been really good in all year.
Billingsley
Kershaw
Kuo
Miller
Elbert
Kuroda
I thought that you were trying to sound young and hip to impress the Dodger kids...or maybe ESPN.
So can someone explain why it's not a good thing for Jones & Pierre to compete for playing time? It being so beneficial and all.
Would you like to shoot him now or wait 'til you get hom?
(And yes, I don't think Jones is much of a guarantee right now. I think Pierre's status has as much to do with uncertainty about Jones. I still think if Jones actually came back and looked like Jones of 2 years ago (or even last year!) that might change things a bit. Whatever, having Furcal back in the leadoff spot will help, even if Slappy is still starting, feh.
Furcal
Pierre
Kent
Jones
Garciapara
Martin
Loney
Kemp
If they start winning, no trades will be made and if they start losing, perhaps the older players will be traded.
But to quote George H.W. Bush and The Dude, this will not stand. I think we should all show our maturity as Dodger fans and blog commmenters and not go bat&$%* over this comment. It's cosmic flame bait.
No?
Battles?
Batman's?
I was thinking that too, but after looking at the short list of 5 games since 1901 when a team won without any hits, the really close comparison is the Ken Johnson no-hit loss to the Reds in 1964. For one thing, the line scores for that game and last night's game are identical. For another, in both cases the only run scored after the pitcher's error allowed a man to reach base. Fun with coincidences!
I guess the problem is, if you ask the right questions, you are more then likley not going to get "any" answers to "any" of your future questions. And that's sad.
In stories about the game, Reds pitcher Joe Nuxhall claimed that Pete Rose should have been given a hit instead of an error being charged to Johnson.
The play was a slow roller that Rose, then a young second baseman, was going to beat out anyway.
I have less than zero interest to see that movie.
Nice win for the fish!!
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/recap;_ylt=AiLgXITqXO24RKfohLSNAKsRvLYF?gid=280629128
That story will be edited a bit more thoroughly soon. But in today's news world, the AP needs to get some story out about a game as soon as possible.
AB:Loney age 24
R:Martin 25
H:Loney 24
2B:tie Kemp/Loney 23/24
3B:Loney 24
HR: tie Kent/Martin 40/25
RBI:Kemp 23
BB:Martin 25 (the great hitting approaches of Kent and Pierre have yielded a total of 28 walks all year)
K (low K rate):Pierre 30
Avg:Martin 25
Slg:Loney 24
OBP:Martin 25
SB:Pierre 30
Our top 4 OPS+ are Martin, Loney, Kemp, and Ethier.
G:Beimel 31
IP:Lowe 35
W:Billingsley 23
W%: sadly Billingsley at .500 age 23
Sv:Saito 38
K:Billingsley 23
ERA:Billingsley 23
I still would like to see some acknowledgement in the mainstream press about the above. How can anyone look at the stat sheet and even come close to concluding that our young players aren't getting something? Simers should be suspended by the LA Times for writing his article without even mentioning who the best players on the team actually are. The whole attitude since DePodesta was first hired just drives me crazy. Everyone with their head just stuck in the sand (or perhaps in a bodily orifice).
I'd like to officially throw my hat into the ring, competing for Torre's job. It'll make him better, Colletti! And I only want half of what he's pulling down.
Now, they've officially screwed up.
Looking back at the other "no-hitters," it is interesting to note that the managers did leave the pitchers in to bat. Yes, I know it was back in the 60s, but still, it was 0-0 and "you have to go for the win."
In the 1964 Cincy-Houston game, Ken Johnson was allowed to make the last out in the bottom of the 8th. Then Joe Nuxhall led off the top of the 9th and grounded out. Later that inning, the Reds got their unearned run.
In the 1967 Detroit-Baltimore game, Earl Wilson batted in the 7th inning, with men on 2nd and 3rd and one out (he popped up). In the bottom of the 8th, with two on and one out, Steve Barber walked (the next batter knocked in the Orioles' only run). Then in the top of the ninth, down 1-0, with two on and no one out, Wilson batted again--admittedly only to sacrifice.
"Dan Haren struck out seven and allowed five hits in six innings for the Diamondbacks, who ended their nine-game road trip 2-8."
How does a team go 2-8 over nine games?
http://shysterball.blogspot.com/2008/06/and-that-happened_27.html
Check the recap of Thursday's White Sox-Dodgers game.
From September 9-11, 1966, the Dodgers did not allow a run to Houston in a 4-game series.
http://tinyurl.com/3m633n
The last 3-game shutout series for LA was July 22-24, 1960 against the Phillies.
It's the same song with a different person/group each year.
http://tinyurl.com/3up39m
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wire_(TV_series)
And also Derek Lowe.
(He was talking about all the people in the ballpark today who have pitched no-hitters.)
"Kuroda, Penny Toss Bullpens"
Harrumph. Don't the Dodgers know that with that much load on their arms, these guys never will make it back? :)
We need to see some mediocre pitching before the youngsters slump again.
Bart: What's that extra B for?
Homer Simpson: That's a typo.
yes.
Oh well, I have a lot of stuff to do today.
And so has Lowe for the most part. I guess it would be justice if Lowe lost this one after last night's win, but I'm not interested in justice.
6-man staff:
Billingsley
Lowe
Stults
Kershaw
Kuroda
Penny
6-man bullpen:
Saito
Broxton
Beimel
Kuo
Park
Wade
Kuroda's activation = Troncoso option
Penny's activation = Falkenborg DFA
No, likely not as much excitement.
Maybe a few yellow cards to the Angels, though, that would be nice.
And the point was scored by someone who hasn't done much of late... aw crap. Although Rivera's not nearly the historical player Torres is.
I'm just saying what's on people's minds.
156 Vlad needs to be bleeding profusely first, though.
I don't recall seeing Pierre come out of a game for an injury while on any team.
Pierre should have milked it more.
I'm not going to lie and say I hope he recovers quickly. But I expect that what will happen, given the Dodgers' medical history, is that Pierre, to show his toughness, will return to the lineup right away, or almost right away. And will play the rest of the season with a bum knee, limping slightly, thus robbed of his one asset, his speed.
But I went through the early 60's.
If you are against one of the best pitchers in the league back then as a Dodger pitcher you don't: Go ahead 2-0, then lose your concentration and throw four balls. That was a run and usually a loss.
In other news, John Lackey is going on to my list, right behind Jake Pevey, who is right behind Peyton Manning, who is right behind Manny Shamalyan.
There is one in downtown Walnut Creek. I just saw them on that show Unwrapped. Maybe I should try it.
HOWEVER
wishing or hoping for somebody to be injured
should be rules violation.
Actually that's Maggie Moo's.
210 - go!
Time to give LaRoche the job full time.
Why on earth are the Angels having a meeting on the mound to talk about how to pitch to Sweeney?
I was going to take a nap this afternoon but watching this game is kind of like taking a nap.
http://www.bb-ref.com/pi/shareit/syC6
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiwmR6CC0Bk
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-offside-in-soccer.htm
If there's ligament damage, be prepared for a panic trade by Ned.
Torre clearly missed his calling, then. He should have been a soccer coach.
1. Billy Grabarkewitz (1969) -- .092 (6 for 65)
2. Mark Sweeney (2008) -- .098 (6 for 61)
LOL!!!!!!!
Wow, a hit. I don't know what to do with myself.
Anyway...
He said a lot of other crazy stuff.
If even Vinny is willing to say it's bad call, that means it's close to being one of the all-time worst.
Martin leads the team in walks, BB 44, SO 37 :)
Only positive was maybe Pierre being out for awhile.
2 outta 3 vs an AL club, and the Angels, ain't bad.
And Lackey really did pitch superbly. Whatcha gonna do?
The Dodgers sometimes hit better on the road, so let's see what they can this week.
I sat through a 30-minute presentation at SABR38 by Dick Cramer and Pete Palmer that confirmed their belief that there is no such thing as a clutch hitter.
It's not that the Dodgers don't have good clutch hitters. They don't have good hitters.
The situation is immaterial. Or else the Dodgers could sign 8 Scott Fletchers to play the field and have the clutchiest team of all time.
They shut Vladdy down.
So we still have a chance and only the baseball Gods know why.
I dub thee-----Andrew the acomplisher--destroyer of globalism. This is good.
Or maybe a squeeel.
Well done.
He's mister hingemeister,
he's a shinmin,
he's mister hingemeister,
he's mister unfrozen screen
They call him hingemeister, whatever breaks, he simplys puts screws in its place, he's too much.
Okay, it doesn't work as nice as the original song, but I tried.
If it's OK, Pierre will rejoin the team Tuesday. Young will be the likely leadoff man Monday night. If Pierre gets DLed, it will be time for the triumphant return of Repko!
Okay, why do cats feel they have to interrupt our catnaps? If that's not ironic, it's at least cruel.
360 Yeah, and I think Jackson was being facetious about Repko batting lead off. Or at least I presume he was. Who knows. But Pee Wee batting lead off would be kind of cool.
"Dodgers LF Juan Pierre, who has been invaluable to the team this season, injured his left knee while sliding into second base on a steal in the sixth inning."
I looked up the word "invaluable," and it turns out it doesn't actually mean "not valuable" so I don't know what Kevin Pearson has been watching.
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/7780/news
Proctor wanted to go his entire career without being on the DL.
Lots of DL for the Dodgers this year.
Is the signing of Gary Bennett the cause of this?
Incidentally--and back to reality, Jones must have taken this time to lose weight, get in shape and work out in the gym and the cage. Although most men would have invested a few million for income in his position, I can't believe someone would give up on the big contracts so easily.
... more from rotoworld:
"Juan Pierre left Sunday's game because of a left leg injury sustained sliding into second base.
With Andruw Jones set to return this week, the Dodgers would benefit if Pierre landed on the disabled list. As is, he's set to remain the regular left fielder, leaving superior players Matt Kemp and Andre Ethier to battle for at-bats. Jun. 29 - 6:51 pm et"
Now, we have the probability of getting Furcal back and losing Pierre so Ethier and Kemp can play everyday. We are so doomed! I just don't understand how one man can fool so many people. We are much better off without him. That's from a baseball perspective.
As a person he is one gutsy son of a gun and I wish him a speedy recovery. He would play on a broken leg and he loves the game a lot. But, the idea his absence makes the team worse could not be further from the truth. Losing a leadoff batter with a .293 OBP won't hurt the team. DL Pierre and play Young against righties and Repko against lefties until the break. Pierre is completely worthless if he tries to run at less than 100%. Play it safe.
And if that's true, is that news? Talk to just about any kid from age 10 to about 27/28 (for some even older). I think you will find that most have a sense of entitlement. It's not something specific to just these young Dodger players.
That's what I don't understand. That is the youth of today. That's what you get. If you refused to sign any young player that had a sense of entitlement, pretty soon the rosters would be bare.
See we have to tell Fanerman five times how to feel entitled, but Nate Purcell feels entitled the first time we tell him.
I think a lot of that comes from the everyday lies children are told by adults, things like "everybody is smart enough to go to college" and "you can be whatever you want to be if you put your mind to it."
It's the downside of the era of political correctness.
I feel like some of these reporters, at least, play into the veterans' mentality that is somewhere along a Scooby Doo villain: "If it wasn't for these meddling kids..."
Herbs, huh?
That's what God said to himself this morning when he decided to injure Juan Pierre.
Oh, so you want to go to one that still means something...that didn't work out too well for us last time.
1. Berroa
2. Maza
3. Newly Acquired Guy Who Gets On Base An Awful Lot
But the bigger part of this equation was the comment about sense of entitlement without results to back it up. The young players are the only position players (besides Furcal) that are producing. Whatever the young players have, I sure wish the older players would get some of it.
vs.
Thanks so much for the AB, I know there are so many others more deserving.
Robot Made of Nails approaches Simers in the Dodgers Clubhouse before a recent game and stands facing him, looks at the top of Simers' head and laughs ...
1) Young
2) Kemp
3) quick return of Pierre
According to Jackson himself (just speculating), in absence of 3) it's Repko.
Apathy has set in.
No, cooking herbs, ya young whippersnapper!
Although my association with 'squee' is kind of embarrassing.
Well, it's either August or the last series in September. I'm away soon after the August series but could do that one; that way if they lose, we can't blame Fanerman. And the late Sept one.
Repko is not allowed to be in the same city as Furcal.
Also, Young shouldn't have any problems playing left field at Minute Maid. There's little to no room to move in left. Anything over his head is probably gone or off the Crawford Boxes.
For the rest of us, this is [fill in the blank]
Be careful Sporky, we all know what happened to Attaboy Shimmin. Of course, he apparently has titanium trashcans.
This is why humanity has video games. At least when Old Snake robs somebody at gunpoint and crushes the guy's groin with his hand, I can pretend that it's a member of the conspiring LA baseball idiots, who somehow manage to actually get paid for their work.
(Sorry... I momentarily drifted off into a world where the Dodgers make player personnel decisions based on merit. Won't let it happen again.)
439 Other than that how'd you like the play Mrs. Lincoln?
DeWitt (LaRoche) - Berroa - Kent (DeWitt) - Loney
Stults
Martin
Young
Ethier
Martin
Loney
Kemp
Kent (DeWitt)
DeWitt (LaRoche)
Berroa
Stults
Just a thought ...
(Alternative thought) ...
With Stults pitching in this lineup the black hole is almost gone.
This is a case where it could make sense to bat Stults #8 in the batting order.
Why not try the alternative lineup until Furcal returns?
I'm already going to Friday's game with other people. We'll have to figure something out for later this season.
I'm really not sure about my thoughts on Pierre. I never want to see a guy get hurt. At the same time, I've voiced my frustration with Pierre as much as everyone else around here.
What this is, more than anything, is a very strange season getting even stranger.
Also, can somebody explain to me how you can break the 100 meter dash world record and not have it count because of the wind being to fast at your back? THAT is a stupid rule.
J.D. Drew is having a monster year. How great would it be to still have him in the lineup? I'm not a big Colletti basher, but looking back, not re-signing him was probably the most regrettable decision of his tenure here. Somewhere around $100 million (Pierre, Garciaparra, Jones) has been spent in an effort to replace what we lost in Drew. Sad.
What's hard to understand about someone not getting a sprint record because they had an aiding wind? Or am I not understanding your question?
Bush #1 pulled up with a hammy out of the gate, Clinton stopped racing to converse with two strategically placed ball girls on the side of the field, and Reagan got confused and ran into the wall.
Marty won.
I find it funny that when Pierre is at his best he's still not better then what has to sit for him, but when he's at his worse, he gets platitudes up the wazoo. He is actually playing the worse baseball of his career but they just can't get enough of him. Actually it is not funny, it is painful. Painfully funny.
That would be me. Making 40 years old the veteran line.
Also, what's Kenny Lofton doing these days?
The record stands but is noted as "wind-aided." It's sort of like the Weaver-Arredondo "no-hitter."
There is also a separate listing for records set at altitude, but they are not stigmatized the same way as "wind-aided" records. The Mexico City Olympics had a bunch of records that lasted for a long time: long jump, 100, 200, 400.
The altitude listing does not come into play for middle distances and higher.
I liked Bob Beamon's record because it gives me a metaphor for whenever anyone breaks a record in some endeavor by a wide margin
"He Beamoned it!"
Even though Mike Powell has had the record for a very long time.
Kyle Russell: 1-3 2bb, k, hbp. on the season, 13bb and 14k in 45AB. Dodgers need to refine his swing somehow this offseason to cut down on the strikeouts without sacrificing too much power.
Javier Solano: 3IP 1H 0ER 2bb 2k 3.86era. I just have a feeling Solano is going to become a top pitching prospect for us.
Lambo: 0-3 bb, k. Hes at 289/350/464 at 19 years old on the season. To put that into perspective, league average is 250/321/370 with the average age being 21.7 years old. So basically, he is right on track, hitting well in a league that suppresses offense.
Carlos Santana: 4-4 3b, bb. On the season so far in 259 ABs, 38 XBHs with a k/bb ratio of 41/52. If this isn't breaking out, I don't know what is. Average age for the CAL League is almost 23 years old so Santana at 22 is right where he should be. I'm expecting a promotion within the next couple of weeks.
Austin Gallagher: 3-4 2b 3b bb. Thats 20 XBHs in 129ABs with a very respectable 30/13 k/bb ratio. I was really disappointed when he didn't the Loons roster and pleasantly surprised when he showed up on the 66ers roster. At 19 years old, with his size and his current contact rates, He is a pretty exciting prospect right now. I believe his power will definitely develop and he is already showing an advanced feel for the strike zone. Dodgers might have hit back to back homeruns in the 3rd and 4th rounds of the 2007 draft.
James McDizzle: 6IP 5H 0ER 1bb 9k. He started the season really slow, but that was attributed to a dead arm phase he was going through. Now at full health, he is steaming through the Southern League; almost as easy as he was last summer. Last 10 Games: 56IP 43H 23bb 58k 2.57era. He is coming on strong and might warrant a call-up if we need another pitcher.
And yet, it was still much better than Juan Pierre's.
Even after all our graduations within the last two years, the Dodgers have reloaded the system really quickly. This isn't even taking into account some of the younger pitcher prospects like Martin and Withrow who we know just by their pedigree, are going to probably do pretty well themselves.
So by the time some of our current youngsters are up for arbitration money and we have to make a decision whether to invest long term or not, having these players as backup plans will definitely help the GM who needs to make those decisions (whoever that person may be because i don't believe its going to be Colletti).
Would you agree?
His age, position, and OBP in the southern league is out of this world.
I think he should be given the job for 2009, ahead of Furcal.
Anyone else feel the same?
Pierre - .265/.296/.309
Kemp - .258/.308/.423
Ethier - .237/.286/.407
While Jones was on the active roster:
Pierre - .290/.342/.309
Kemp - .323/.370/.466
Ethier - .281/.349/.425
I'm not sure how the rotation system played into these stats and you are talking about a larger sample size for the numbers with Jones than without. But they are what they are.
Re: Santana, where would he get promoted to, though? Isn't Lucas May at Jacksonville? Could they both be there, or is May due to get bumped to Vegas? (And I know Ellis is considered less of a prospect, but doesn't he also affect that decision?) Anyway, will be interesting to see. And to think some thought the Dodgers were barren at catcher in the minors after Russell Martin. (I thought that at the time, but May and Santana moved on in and up pretty quickly.)
He is #3 for me behind McDonald and Elbert. Elbert's last outing was really encouraging for me (3IP 1H 1bb 7k). If he can get back to where he was pre-surgery, he's a better prospect than DeJesus.
With Ivan's power being basically non-existent- I know I've asked this before but- will his patience translate to the majors when pitchers realize if they just throw it down the middle of the plate, he's not going to really do much with it?
Also, Ivan played 2b. Is that because Dodgers love versatility or is something wrong with his defense at short? Coming into this season, scouting reports were very good on his defense though.
I could see a DH/C combo between the two of them. Catching is grueling and not everyone has the same energy as Russ Martin. I'm sure rotation them in the humidity of Florida in August would not be a bad thing.
I just think Santana's peripherals are just too good for the CAL League. He needs another challenge offensively.
Which is excellent I know. All I'm asking is some line drive, gap-gap power to keep pitchers honest. If that can happen with maturation, he's a perfect #2 hitter.
476 That's very interesting. The data do support the idea that a little bit of job insecurity makes these guys play better. I don't want to get into this, but it also supports the idea of a double standard - Pierre "has been great", in Torre's eyes, while Kemp/Ethier are facing a platoon type situation. I do understand, however, that management is impatient for these guys to continue improving, and using the incentive of less playing time is one way to motivate better performance. Pierre is through with his development, but the lack of playing time seemed to motivate him as well. With all the usual caveats about small sample sizes etc.
472 AND he clogs up the bases all the time. I almost forgot about that.
I am not half the warrior that Scott Proctor is, that's for sure. It's bed time for me here on the East coast.
Who are we talking about here?
I was talking about De Jesus...he has more walks than Ks...
This year hes at 53bb 46k and his rates have gotten better every year; increasing his walks and lowering his strikeouts.
2005 Rookie Ball combined: 16bb 40k
2006 Low A: 63bb 85k
2007 high A: 57bb 64k
2008 AA: 53bb 46k
No way. NedCo has Jones to lean on now. Since he's going back into the lineup, with a handy Delwyn Young on the bench, and with a possible return of Furcal, we have all the depth we need right here.
The LAST thing Ned would ever do is trade youngsters to replace Juan Pierre. The worst he could possibly do is nab Moises Alou off the waiver wire or something like that, assuming the Mets release him. Even that won't happen with Repko waiting in the wings.
475 -- I am surprised by your enthusiasm for a hitting prospect with absolutely no power, though I understand how the walks would attract you. Best prospect in the system? No, but he is legitimately in the 2 to 5 range.
Canuck, who do you feel is the best prospect on the Odgen team right now?
Man, the GCL team doesn't really look too exciting in terms of positional players doesn't it?
vr, Xei
The Rays are definitely surprising to me. I'd figured they'd be 4th in the AL East with an outside shot at being competitive (and figured they'd maybe be good enough to compete in a couple of years). I think most knew the Padres were due to fall apart, I just think a lot of us had that scheduled for 2009, not 2008. I can't explain the Rockies, other than bad timing with injuries. As for the Giants, well, they're 5 games out by default.
I think the Dodgers know what they have with Solano and they are babying him a bit. He's only 18 years old. When Ethan Martin starts pitching (what the hell is he doing now anyways?), he'll probably get the 3 inning out treatment as well.
Hello again, Xei. Let's talk surprises!
The 150:1 Rays with the best record in baseball.
Gotta be the biggest surprise so far. I knew they'd be very good, and I predicted them to win 85 games this year, but I never thought they'd be THIS good. It's such a great story.
The Mariners: worst record in AL
Not surprising at all. That team was mismanaged for years and I still can't believe anybody was predicting them to win a wild card. They have some decent hitters, but that Adam Jones trade was HORRIBLE. And, what do you know? The O's are above .500 .
Padres in last place
I'm with KG16.
The Rockies
The Rockies' predicament is the least surprising development in MLB this year. If I could have called anything, I was calling the Rockies to come crashing down to earth. I felt the same way about the Dbacks but I'm not convinced they regressed to the mean yet.
Giants 5 games out
I didn't think this was so surprising. That they're only 5 out is surprising, but that they're competing doesn't shock me. Early on I felt their starting pitching was too good for a last place team. No way, I thought, could they lose 100 games. They've been ok from time to time. Rowand and Molina are hitting rather well so far.
How about the Oakland A's?
Did you think that their record would be this good before the season began? How do you think they'll end up?
Yes, BH I think several things are going to happen with Ivan Junior. His patience will play in the big leagues and he will develop more gap power. I have nothing to base this on other then my own subjective opinion. Unlike Joey there is no way I give the job to Ivan Junior next year. He won't be ready until 2010 for the bigs. He was the only Dodger prospect to make the futures team. I included a little scouting report on him from HQ over at True Blue.
http://www.insidesocal.com/dodgers/2008/06/white-sox-6-dod.html
vr, Xei
I'm going to start telling people I'm 6'4" now.
If Logan is in the Dominican, we might have some talent coming in around july 2nd.
I find it interesting. We went from having virtually no left handed power to well... a lot. Hopefully one of them will turn into a big league slugger. Though as you said, history isn't on their side.
CO 6-22 .214
AZ 4-17 .190
SD 6-29 .171
SF 4-21 .160
LA 1-30 .032
Last year, the Dodgers were 8-42 in those games.
Pierre will not go on the DL. He's a gamer. Torre will be impressed by his gameriness and put him in the lineup every day, even if his speed is neutralized by his messed-up knee. He'll hit about .100, won't be able to steal bases, and will have to play deeper LF, meaning his throws will land somewhere about 50 feet from the shortstop hole. And Torre will be delighted.
You think Pierre was bad before. I predict we're about to see Pierre try to be like Furcal 2007.
That's kind of what you want, though, isn't it? The last thing you want is for those guys to turn into average, Ethier-type hitters, because they'll all probably end up at first base and a first baseman who hits like Andre Ethier will only hurt your team. Better to take a bunch of high-ceiling, all or nothing guys. If four of them crash and burn but the other one turns into Jim Thome, then you can consider yourself successful.
1. If Pierre goes on the DL, Repko brought up from Vegas.
2. Prior to Wednesday's game, Troncoso optioned, Kuroda activated from 15-day DL.
3. If Penny passes his simulated game, prior to Saturday, Falkenborg DFA (or if they decide this 6-man rotation is not going to be used, Stults optioned, Penny activated from 15-day DL.
4. If Furcal passes through his rehab stint, Furcal activated from 15-day DL, Berroa optioned to Vegas.
5. If Nomar deems himself fit to play, than several things could happen. First, someone is going to have be removed from the 40-man roster. Off the active roster, the choices could be Sweeney or Maza. My hunch is that it will be Maza. While the Dodgers will still search for a legitimate utility player who can play 2B/SS, if Furcal and Nomar are both activitated, they will probably keep LaRoche as the back up at 2B and Nomar will be the back up SS. The reason I think Sweeney survives is that if Pierre is hurt, Young will play in the OF and they won't have another left-hand bat on the bench.
So a week from today, the 25-man roster could look like this:
Pitchers (12): Penny, Lowe, Kuroda, Billingsley, Kershaw, Stults, Wade, Beimel, Kuo, Park, Broxton and Saito.
Catchers (2): Martin and Ardoin
Infield (7): Loney, Kent, Furcal, Garciaparra, DeWitt, LaRoche and Sweeney
Outfield (4): Ethier, Kemp, Young and Repko.
Well, here are the usage rates for the last 6 days:
Falkenborg - 3 games
Wade - 3 games
Troncoso - 2 games
Broxton - 2 games
Saito - 2 games
Beimel - no appearances
Kuo - no appearances
He hasn't pitched in a week now. Torre also gave him a 10 day stretch with no appearances from 6/1-6/11. Guo last 20 innings... 1-ER, 21-K, 2-BB, 0-HR, 13-Hits. Numbers good enough to be our closer.
vr, Xei
Yea, but then again- he has had a lot to prove... that should get better given his stellar first half.
Man, our pitching has been amazing.
Thats why Wade/Falkenborg have been used in their 1-inning stints instead of Kuo.
Stults/Park/Wade almost make up for how bad Penny's been this year. Those 3 have been amazing.
He's got 28 home runs at AAA Albuquerque--> Marlins affiliate.
Putting up some monster Billy Ashley/Jack Cust type AAA stats:
.311/.425/.705
Granted, Proctor has been pretty good at turning high leverage situations in to low leverage ones.
515 - I would also be in favor of sending DeWitt back down to try to get his bat going again and, more importantly, play 2B almost exclusively to prepare for next season. Replace him with Lindsey or Tiffee for bench duty.
Record when starter is pitching:
Penny/Park: 7-9
Lowe: 9-9
Kuroda/Stults: 8-9
Billingsley/Kuo: 7-10
Loiaza/Kuo/Park/Kershaw: 7-6
http://tinyurl.com/572dhg
Joe Torre wants to win now and everyone knows that if you want to win now, you play the people who know how to win. Ask Larry Bowa, Jeff Kent, ask Ned Colletti. They'll all tell you the same thing and these guys have been around baseball longer than most of us have been alive--the youngsters may get you there but you can't trust them to win games for you. You need the vets. They know how to play the game the right way.
That is the best argument I can make for Joe Torre's decision to play Juan Pierre over Andre Ethier and Matt Kemp. Now, if you want to make an argument based on how productive each player has been, well... you're on your own.
They list him at 6'7 210# as a 16yr old.
Fire Frank McCourt.
Berroa is out of options.
.194/.256/.389
And yet, he still out-OPSed Pierre.
It's not uncommon for managers to stick and keep guys in the leadoff spot who don't get on base an awful lot. It is, however, uncommon to pay said managers $4 million a year.
At least, I think that's what they're thinking...
The Yankees won 109 games and scored 827 runs.
Just think of how many runs they would have scored that year with somebody getting on base.
The Yankees high OBP guys that year were all power hitters (Maris, Mantle, and Howard.)
So all we need is Pujos, A-Rod and Ryan Howard. Then Pierre wont be a problem.
And hey, didn't the Dodgers use two of their weakest hitters at the top of the order last year? I'm just sayin'...
Jerry Hairston and Jay Bruce seem to have the leadoff job now. With an occasional Norris Hopper or Joey Votto tossed in.
We don't have the horses.
More like Josh Hamilton, Carlos Quentin, and Jorge Posada.
Just go again tomorrow. :-)
I'm genuinely curious. I know how bad he is at getting on base. But he has seemed more patient since Furcal has been out in May or Jine, and made a few walks and hits as a result. And just about everyone else has been worse than they were before (especially DeWitt, and probably Kemp too). Is there really a big difference still?
He musta productive outed for a fraction of a run here and there as well. And good piece of hittinged.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/best-outfield-arms-of-2007/
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=6845
We can complain about Pierre's .301 OBP in June but having three automatic outs(DeWitt, Berroa, Pitcher) at the bottom of our lineup is also killing us. We are not turning over the lineup enough to be effective. This will change and when it does watch what the middle of the order will do with their 4th at bat against a struggling starter or middle relief. Right now these guys have to face the teams setup guy or closer in their 4th ab.
This is just a subjective opinion and I've done no study to support this opinion.
I am expecting this too.
The weird thing about all of this is that we have stayed in the race with horrible offense. It can't get much worse, and if we turn it around, than watch out NL West. I am still amazed we split the series with the Cubs at home and took the series against the Angels. This is a testament to our great pitching, and I feel like things will only get better.
Napoli has Premature Jeff Kent Syndrome.
If anybody could use Sabbathia it is Tampa and they have plenty of guns to get it done. I don't think anyone could come close to matching any package they put out for him.
Heh. Imagine what he'll be like in 10, 15 years.
All of a sudden, I'm having a brainstorm. Make the All-Star game into a division vs. division All-Star tournament! With seedings based on combined records.
Day 1: Three elimination games, leaving three next-rounders to go to...
Day 2: Second and third-highest seeded teams play each other.
Day 3: Winner of Day 2 plays highest-seeded team.
Day 3 winner gets to designate some big pot of money to go to charities selected by each team in the division.
No more home run derby. More players get to participate. Fun for all! And then we'll see if the NL West is really "the weakest."
AKA Premature Ejerkulation.
I don't think the players would be into your All Star division tournament. They hardly care about the single All Star game we currently have.
Better yet, instead of taking the best team from each division and even throwing in the best non-division winner and having some sort of playoff to see which division representative is the best, why not using some kind of ranking system involving voters and computers? The top two teams in the rankings at the end of the year could duke it out for the championships, and you could have 14 other series matchups involving the other teams, just for fun.
584 I like this idea! As long as fans can choose the line-ups. ;-)
vr, Xei
The players, owners, and players union would have absolutely no interest in playing these extra games.
Shields had the healthiest perception for Kemp's comments. I just think Napoli and Garland were pissed about losing that way.
Jon links to his site, Take back the Times, on his sidebar.
http://takebackthetimes.blogspot.com/2008/05/realization-of-goal-malta-is-my-100th.html
First, every team has an All-Star.
Second, either Russell or maybe Chad will be picked by the coaches, I'd bet.
605 Don't we have to, as outlined in the rules?
VORP for Dodger shortstops this year...
Furcal 26.7
Maza - negative 2.2
Berroa - negative 5.0
Hu - negative 9.9
Soto is way ahead in the voting for catcher right now. McCann and Martin are the two most deserving. It looks like they will have to take 3 catchers for the NL. If the Dodgers get only one representative, it would have to be Martin.
.309/.378/.670/1.048
He is good at baseball.
Let Kent go. It's his last shot. Martin will have lots more opportunities.
Well, they could vote for Rowand. Though he's not currently in the top 15.
The whole Rays team is good at baseball. And this is with BJ Upton not hitting for power, Crawford under his career averages, and Pena missing a chunk of time. They are going to be scary good for a really long time.
Their front office is spectacular and Andrew Friedman is tremendous.
Plus, Russell would only catch a few innings at most, if that, and would still get days off around the game.
Also not painful: trading with Ned Colletti.
Arizona has 20 such games remaining.
Very true, but a most of their contributors were pickups. Navarro, Howell, Jackson, Garza, Aybar, Pena, Floyd, Percival, Wheeler, Miller, Bartlett, Iwamura, Hinske, Gross were all acquired by Friedman, I believe. Not too shabby.
You need to pick first when your competition spends 200 million on salary. I would bet the RedSox and Yankee's spent more on bonus money then the Rays over the last 10 years even with the Rays having a top 5 pick every year. Going over slot tends to take away the advantage of being lousy year after year.
621
That is the key most of their players are actually under performing their projections. Until June, even Longoria was very pedestrian. He has more then made up for his lackluster start with an explosive June.
That's the sense I got from reading him, even though I never met him.
"A most" should be "a lot"
Now I'm hearing that for once they may be looking to acquire veteran players to help their playoff run. The one time I'd actually want Ned to maybe deal with them and he probably won't. Not that I'd fully trust it... but...
http://preview.tinyurl.com/6jd2wk
They have all of the resources to be a player for a guy like Sabathia. They would have to give up some guys like Hellickson, Davis, etc but if they got Sabathia they would easily have the best 1-3 in baseball. Plus they would get the 2 draft picks once C.C leaves, so they could probably replace what they gave up in the first place.
vr, Xei
He also says the DH works against the Rays because they generally cannot sign a good one to be just a DH.
"Outfielder Jason Repko was expected to be activated for Monday night's game against the Astros, although the player he will replace on the Dodgers roster was still to be determined. "
http://tinyurl.com/6asvsl
*
My reaction: If Pierre doesn't go on the DL, it could be the end of Sweeney.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.