Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
When the Dodgers got off to a 22-4 start in 1977, Sports Illustrated sent Larry Keith to see why they were so up. A fella by the name of Ron Cey had a lot to do with it.
Among other things, though, there was this detail about playing the Dodger starting eight as a unit throughout Spring Training, which I don't recall ever hearing about.
Lasorda insists the daily lineup card explains everything. "They're winning because they're outstanding," he says. "I'm not surprised by our success at all." Lasorda does admit he may have expedited matters some by working his eight regulars Davey Lopes, Bill Russell, Smith, Cey, Steve Garvey, Monday, Baker and Yeager as a unit all through spring training. Before the preseason schedule began, Lasorda kept them on their own private practice field, where they got plenty of extra batting practice and could train, he says, like heavyweights preparing for a championship fight. He started the eight in the first intrasquad game and again in the exhibition opener. All spring he played them together and rested them together; they became a single body with eight equal parts. When it was suggested last week that the Mets might want to break the unit up by trading slugger Dave Kingman for Baker, Lasorda replied, "If I have any say, the answer will be no. And I do have the say."
I still suspect the talent thing had more to do with the Dodgers' success, but the anecdote adds to my nostalgia for that team.
That would have been a disaster.
Night after night, some scribe would have asked Lasorda his opinion of Kingman's performance, and...
I'd buy a ticket to watch that.
--
Hey, according to the Boston Herald (and MLB Trade Rumors), the Red Sox are still looking for an heir to Jason Varitek; apparently the Sox have inquired about catching prospects. The Rangers are considered to have the game's largest surplus at the position.
Since people had mentioned Lucas May in previous thread discussing a Jack Wilson trade, would the Red Sox be interested in May? (Not Santana!) And who do they have the Dodgers might be interested in (not Julio Lugo!)
In 2005, the most common was used just 7 times.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3476648
But I suspect they'll probably be dealing with the Rangers. Those two teams have already made one major deal in the last year. And you gotta love the marketing possibilities of Boston having a catcher named MaxRam.
But you're probably right that a Rangers-Sox trade would be more likely.
19 I need to get a faster server or something.
{{slinks back to work}}
I believe there is a tendency at times by some to downplay what managements says but I tend to at least try to meet it halfway. Loney is beginning to go the other way more, his key double to left in yesterday's game was not a lob shot down the line but a soundly hit ball to left.
And Ethier was primarily sitting against lefties, on this trip he faced mostly righties outside of Zito and one of the Houston pitchers.
Again, I don't want to disregard the playing everyday element and perhaps it works for Ethier in particular but there lots of examples on the Dodgers where just getting your name in the lineup guarantees consistent performance for both young and old.
vr, Xei
http://www.flickr.com/groups/dodgerthoughts/
Franceour, SS Brent Lillibridge, RP Vladimir Nuñez called up; IF Omar Infante, P Jeff Bennett, and RP Manny Acosta all to the DL.
At the very least, you get a larger sample and then can make conclusions on how well the player really is.
"Why are the Dodgers so determined to trade Kemp? He looks like he could be a superstar....very scary to have him batting leadoff. The Dodgers definitely have a good lineup. Frankly, a reflection I would have from the weekend is that this team is seriously underachieving. They should be playing much better than their record. I guess the second thought would be that they should run away with it in the second half. Maybe the starting pitching is a little eh. Stults pitched well, though. That Chinese guy in the bullpen had a lot to do with LA taking the series...he is a very tough pitcher. It's like he comes in and puts some sort of chemical retardent on the Giants.
"What I was saying about the Giants is that their season has been the opposite of what everyone thinks about this team. The offense has been decent, actually. They don't have any boppers, but when they have Lewis, Winn, Durham, Molina, Rowand, Bowker, Burriss, Castillo and Aurilia all going, they can score some runs, and in a very exciting fashion. True, it may not be showing promise "for the future," since it is mostly vets; but Lewis and Burriss (ss) and maybe Bowker have probably proven themselves as everyday players. So, that's three, plus Rowand and I'd hang on to Molina until he just can't do it anymore.
"And, the bullpen has been unreliable...some very good performances, but overall, only slightly better than last year's disaster. So, they are shuffling in a bunch of new guys from the minors. I tell you, it kills Giants fans to see that Joe Nathan was selected to the AL Allstar team for about the 4th or 5th time."
Yeah. Joe Nathan. It's good for Ned to keep his mind focused on Joe Nathan when he thinks about this or any other trading deadline.
He faced 3 lefties out of the 7 games played:
Zito, Jonathan Sanchez, and Wandy Rodriguez.
That's a great description. He's been doing it to the whole league. The Dodgers have a very formidable late inning bullpen (if used correctly) in Beimel/Guo/Broxton/Saito.
vr, Xei
Basically, my standard is this: If it's an argument I would reject as silly if used on behalf of Juan Pierre, then I can't very well accept the argument on behalf of other players. If someone were arguing that the reason Juan Pierre stinks is because he wasn't getting regular playing time, I'd laugh in their face.
I think it's random fluctuation. The fact that two things happen at the same time (Ethier starts playing/Ethier starts hitting) does not necessarily mean it's cause and effect.
Since coming to the major leagues, the month when Ethier started the fewest games was July 2007. That was also the best month of his career, with a .383/.471/.550 line.
The month in which Ethier started the second-fewest games was June 2006. In that month he batted .344/.368/.453.
But nice write-up from Brother Ratt.
I think it "works" in every case. If you give a player consistent Abs, you'll find out much sooner what kind of player he is rather than later. Blake Dewitt has been given rather consistent ABs. We have a very good understanding of how good of player he is right now--> unfortunately isnt very good.
Now is the time to give those consistent Abs to LaRoche.
Ethier, it could be argued, needs consistent ABs too because the team really doesnt know exactly what type of player he is. Is he a 3, or really a 3.5?
At any rate, the club is certainly benefitting from his getting ABs over Pierre.
The TV market with the highest overnight Nielsen rating for the Wimbledon men's final was in St. Louis.
I dont agree with the 2nd part. If this were true, then young players would never be able to break into the lineup consistently because they'd have no history of "being good".
The only way to prove your good is to play everyday and perform. Thats exactly why you play your young players over PVL, with the hope they'll prove their worth and get better.
If this was one of the chosen ones, many here would be saying to let it play out, don't rush to conclusions.
If you want to use the argument that LaRoche is better and he should play, well then unfortunately for Andy, he is going to do something like Ryan Howard did a few years ago and have just insane games that overwhelm people.
Now, how he does that in the limited amount of games he plays in will be difficult but fate has dealt him that hand, DeWitt right now is the chip leader, not saying Andy has to go all in but he better hope to get some good cards.
vr, Xei
But they do have a history of being good. A long one, usually. Which is exactly why they're in the majors in the first place.
I wish nothing but the best for Pierre's knee and other body parts. But I dread his return, and more than that I dread how the resumption of mediocre play after he returns is going to be blamed on everyone but him and the manager who insists on playing him.
I'm going to hope that the reason Torre got so attached to Pierre was his attitude, and that in the current period, he's seeing a comparable attitude from the players who would have to sit if Pierre was reinstalled in the lineup. More games like Sunday's could change this team's destiny.
here are the dodger's ops' the last 28 days
loney .988
kemp .714
ethier .864
young .650
martin .847
kent .827
maza .483
berroa .503
laroche .681
dewitt .388
pierre .577
so if nomar and andruw jones can come back play a decent amount of games give us a .700+ OPS, the line-up looks pretty good. even better if joe stops platooning laroche and makes him the everyday 3b, right now dewitt is killing our offense.
I think I've got a piece of Torre figured out. Grady Little played people because of some misguided idea of trying to be fair to everyone and to keep players like LuGo from getting too grouchy and contaminating the clubhouse.
Torre plays people because he or his coaches observe that they have the "right attitude," exemplified by how closely they listen to them and emulate the behavior of players Joe favors. On the positive side, it's pretty easy to go from Joe's doghouse to his living room. DeWitt figured it out from day one, as did Pierre. I think Kemp is starting to get it, and I hope the same can be said for LaRoche.
The "I consult the stats and play the best players, considering the matchups" style of managing has not been seen in the history of LA Dodger baseball. If it ever did, what the hell would that be like?
"It's complicated enough that the team has its warm fuzzy for Blake DeWitt, but if you asked them in November or January or in the abstract who should play third base in a choice between DeWitt and Andy LaRoche, the answer should have never changed: LaRoche. While injury and a hot streak by DeWitt might have briefly muddled that particular picture, that answer still has to be the same. Nothing has changed in terms of the relevant skills of the players involved, but sentiment's getting in the way of what should be a relatively cold-blooded and sensible management decision."
Amusing quote, if not a rule 1 violation. I thought Jim Tracy might have set lineups based on stats, but it might have been more about "how did player x do against such and such pitcher?" with small sample sizes.
Or I could be wrong altogether.
If Joe doesn't like Kemp (or hasn't, at any point in the year), I certainly don't see how that has manifested itself on the playing field.
I'm going to throw this into the myth/superstition category unless someone can show otherwise. You'll find some anecdotal examples, but for every example you name I can name a counter-example like Darryl Strawberry or Mike Lieberthal.
Baseball players are either good or not good, and I don't think that changes based on whether they're playing in their hometown.
Right now my favorite Dodgers are from Ohio, Montreal, Oklahoma, Texas, and Kansas. I guess if two players were of equal value, I'd prefer the local guy, but other than that it doesn't matter to me.
As for Wilson, himself, I'm not against getting him if the Dodgers give up nothing of consequence on the MLB roster, if it doesn't mean that Nomar automatically starts every game at third despite what his performance might dictat, and if the Dodgers are willing to eat the money Wilson is owed next year to find a better shortstop.
When the Dodgers first came to L.A., they liked to play up the local angle on players. Guys like Drysdale and the Sherry brothers fit the bill.
However, most people in L.A. aren't from L.A. They don't care too much about hometown heroes. Who knows who they are anyway? Do people know now which Dodgers are from Southern California? (Kent, Garciaparra, Young, and Falkenborg are the locals. But Falkenborg was just born out here and lives in Washington. And Kent lives in Texas. Which leaves Nomar and Pee Wee.) The Dodgers are definitely not like teams like the Reds, who are quite keen on having a local hero.
The local guy angle is really only a factor if you're trying to draw fans. But few markets have fans that care where the players are from. They just want to have good players.
vr, Xei
DeWitt is going to get some time to see if he can come out of his slump - as well he (or any other young player) should.
While I've been a booster of DeWitt's, I'm also looking forward to seeing what LaRoche can do. I don't want to see either of them short changed.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
But Torre isn't that dumb, is he? How could he possibly justify batting Pierre leadoff over Kemp?
vr, Xei
The flavor of the day in trade talks seems to be Indians third baseman Casey Blake, according to foxsports.com. I bring this up because on a day yesterday when it was learned the Dodgers lost out on acquiring Cleveland ace C.C. Sabathia, Joe Torre had this to say before the game about trade talks: "I don't think there's going to be a franchise guy available to you at this juncture...When you see Cleveland struggling, and you know there's going to be free agents, that seems to be the hot club to talk to." Blake is a free agent at season's end.
The Dodgers are need of infield help since Nomar Garciaparra isn't expected to be able to play every day. Torre, who will give Garciaparra days off, had a nice quote on that situation as well.
"It's sort of a prophylactic measure," he said. "You like that one, huh? It fits him. It's trying to be safe."
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
"Dan Wheeler (1.82 ERA) hasn't allowed a home run in his last 18 appearances, spanning 16 1/3 innings pitched."
Well he just allowed two back-to-back bombs to cost them today's ballgame!
vr, Xei
It would be horrible for a "gotcha" call to happen at a crucial point in a game.
I find it really perplexing that people keep supporting playing Dewitt. He's had 271 PA to show what he's got, and he's shown he's not ready. One little spot of the season excepted, he's been awful. Not to mention Laroche has shown in the minors that he is a MUCH better player. In a tight race for the division we can't afford to let Dewitt keep hurting us, as that could cost us our season. Dewitt had his chance, now please let it be Andy's turn and let Dewitt develop in the minors.
He loves AJones, so he plays and bats 5th. When Torre was with the Yankees, he fell out of love with ARod and he batted 8th.
That is how he manages, not much more scientific than that.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.