Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The Trolley Dodger passes along this footage from a Flickr user of the demolition of Ebbets Field, made more poignant by the presence of Roy Campanella.
Watch for Roger Kahn in your rear view mirror.
Baseball was already past the Mississippi River in 1958. There were teams in St. Louis and Kansas City.
Baseball was going to expand to the West Coast eventually. It was just a matter of which people were smart enough to take up the matter.
As for DeWitt, he's looked pretty good at 2nd so far to me.
As for Santana, I'm sad we gave him up.
As for Brooklyn, I hope they're over it by now.
5 Sportswriters may be larger than they appear in mirror.
It's scary to think about...
You "guessed" correctly.
9
LA and San Francisco would have expansion teams, both probably from the AL, since they went first in 1961. Maybe an NL team like the Braves would have moved and set up shop in Orange County later in the 60s.
Though one could argue leaving the second largest city in America for a smaller one is different from leaving Brooklyn for LA, but the point is still the same and hearts are still heavy.
1B Barton
2B Cardenas
SS Free Agent (Khalil Greene?)
3B Free Agent (Beltre?)
LF Cunningham
CF Gonzalez
RF Buck
DH Carter
SP Cahill
SP Anderson
SP Gonzalez
SP Gallagher
SP Eveland
Even if everything breaks right, is this that good of a team? In the likely event that some of these guys flame out, is this even a decent team? Guys like Cunningham and Smith are nice additions to a strong team, but you can't build around them. I'm thinking more and more that all but the best prospects aren't that valuable in the long term.
Haven't seen you around in a while, but wanted to tell you I saw the Strange Boys with Crystal Antlers last night. Strange Boys killed it, too. I like what those dudes are doing. Jonny was saying Jay Reatard did a song for them. Also, have you seen the Crystal Antlers PitchforkTV bit?
http://search.barnesandnoble.com/End-of-Baseball/Peter-Schilling/e/9781566637824
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
Yes.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/32912172@N00/2847798430/
I desperately want that cool button and switch contraption sitting next to him.
vr, Xei
You are forgetting Jemile Weeks. They still have young guys that they will trade and get more pieces for.
Duscherer will probably be traded. Street, either Ryan Sweeney or Buck. Then they have more prospects to trade like Simmons, Brown, etc.
Wait a minute...Bitch Lady? A grudge is what you're holding in addition to memories, more like.
I am going to a game in each stadium this weekend and would like to think about historical moments other then two dodgers thrown out at home or reggie jacksons three home runs.
Gibson and Scoscia's HRs in Shea 1988?
Dodgers in Yankee stadium in 1981?
Sorry I am too lazy to research this myself before my flight to NYC
The idea is that if his defense was good enough to be a middle infielder in the bigs, he would have been playing shortstop, and I don't think his bat plays in a corner.
Fautino De Los Santos
Craig Italiano
Vince Mazzaro
Adrian Cardenas
Jemile Weeks
Matt Sulentic
Arnold Leon
Josh Donaldson
Jose Garcia
Josh Outman
They could all make something of themselves.
Thanks for the point to 1963
Yankees only scored four runs in the whole series. That and Sandy striking out 15 are good ones to pull out if I get into discussions with Yankee fans. I plan on wearing my LA hat and assume I won't get jumped by Brooklynites.
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/standings/index.jsp
The Dodgers' magic number is 14, which makes them even with the Mets in terms of proximity to the Promised Land of the postseason.
It's rather the essential component of Vin's commenting - decency, integrity, absence of homerism, and good research - that others could at least try for. Why don't they? I guess just having two commentators naturally leads to mindless chatter.
Vin used to do games with broadcast partners. Does anyone knows how and when this changed, that he switched to broadcasting - by happenstance, when a partner wasn't available and he just had a go on his own, and/or did he insist upon it some year when a colleague retired? I've never seen any discussion of this.
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/smart-growth-and-mlb-a-virtual-history/
I plan on it.
As I was 10 when Jackson hit his HR's those memories are pretty deep. I am a little disappointed I couldn't come up with a "moment" in 1981 that stayed in my memory. I remember tributes to Jim Gilliam but the 3 player MVP dilutes the memories. But we did clinch in Yankee Stadium in game 6 so I will bring that one with me. And it was the end of the "70's" infield so that was significant.
Sorry - that was missing a word at the end - "switched to broadcasting solo."
Jackie Robinson turned many fans into Dodger fans who had no affiliation with Brooklyn.
Probably are but we never hear of them because they would never get hired in today's world.
1. Howard 42
2t Dunn 36
Quentin 36
4. Delgado 35
5t. Manny 34
Braun 34
Odds finishing with the most HR's
1. Howard 1-10
2. Qunetin 1-2
Dunn 7-1
4. Delgado 50-1
5. Manny 75-1
Braun 6-1
Is it me or does something just not seem right here?
http://tinyurl.com/5yqz87
Howard seems like free money though.
The park were Houston plays (don't know its current name), can you explain why the first few years of this decade it was an extreme hitters park, than the last few years changed to a nuetral/pitchers park without dimension changes or other changes?
Kershaw has 20 innings left this year before he hits the limit the organization set for him. He should be shut down until the last weekend of the season against the Giants so that he can start a couple games in the playoffs, but it seems like they're going to keep pitching him in the rotation and start Maddux in the playoffs if Penny can't go. What am I missing?
On the other hand, I did a post that talked about Kershaw, so you're definitely not the only one there.
73 No, you're not the only one. Some of us here have been wondering if Kershaw can be skipped. I asked Tony Jackson about it yesterday in fact, no response yet. Not sure if Stults or Park would fare that much better but at least we'd give Kershaw's arm a break.
SportsNation Keith Law: I think this is his peak right now - 127 OPS+, .367/.522 ... I didn't peg him as a .200+ ISO guy, more of a high-average/doubles guy who'd hit ~20 bombs in a peak year, and I don't think he's got THAT much more power than I expected. On the plus side, he'll be a lot healthier than Trot.
http://proxy.espn.go.com/chat/chatESPN?event_id=22379
Much, much better.
SportsNation Keith Law: Kershaw probably has the best stuff and the highest ceiling, followed by Liriano. Lester is by far the most advanced in approach and feel. If I had to take someone to pitch tomorrow, it'd be Lester.
But--based on last night--apparently Manny does not find Petco to be all that much a pitcher's park.
Neither of these things happened/will happen. Joe Torre, way to earn that $4 million.
Do they usually do OK there? Or does the thinner air mean sinkers don't sink? I dunno....
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3581523
Think it's crazy to try to play anything in Houston from Friday night til Sunday.
http://www.suntimes.com/sports/baseball/cubs/1158214%2ccubweather091108.article
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/photos/ewade360300aw.jpg
http://letsgosox.blogspot.com/2008/09/john-shelby-i-am-your-density.html
If the Cubs win, it will be much, much worse than the Red Sox from a couple years ago. We must do everything we can to prevent this from happening.
http://www.athleticsnation.com/2008/9/11/612415/so-who-are-we-rooting-for
I'd have a hard time defending Dodger fans. Nothing has ruined my experience more at DS then stupid fans who go to the game to be heard as though we paid our money to listen to their stupidity. Hey look at me, I'm a total loser in life but I can pay 20.00 and act like a bigshot and yell at the left fielder's back the whole game. Then I can get drunken high fives from the other idiots around me.
This, to me, is the principle difference between Angel fans and Dodger fans: Angels fans remember the good guys. Dodger fans, in the main, are ignoramuses, present company excepted, of course.
I've always noticed the worst crowds come during games against the Giants and games against other big market teams at night.
Day game crowds are loads better... I've been to two day games this year and the crowds are surprisingly cool. This is in the Reserve Level no less.
I always got a kick out of us hating our own fans. I've had my own bad experiences, but like underdog says, its similar to other ballparks.
Absolutely. The Lakers are, have been, and always will be the team I care about most. I was on the brink of tears after Game 6 this year.
That's no knock on the Dodgers, no sir! I think they're a solid #2 on my passion list.
A.C. Milan
Dodgers
Lakers
Man Utd
But lately, I am way more preoccupied with the Dodgers, so maybe it's a tie.
I care about the Lakers but they are a very distant second place.
I think I should blame the lack of interest in basketball and football on my wife. Before I met her, I was way into that stuff.
It's also nice that the Dodgers and Lakers' seasons combine to fill the entire year... except sometimes October.
Lowe 131.1 IP, 91 K's, 23 BB's, 2.74 ERA
Billingley 123.1 IP, 119 K's, 42 BB, 2.70 ERA
That's a pretty good 1-2 punch.
College Football and NFL football are tied for 3.
1. Dodgers
2. Lakers
3. Angels
4. USC Football
5. UCLA Basketball
32 Years ago.
1. Reds
2. Vikings
3. Lakers
4. Dolphins
5. LA Kings
6. Angels
7. Liverpool
I was a bit of a rebel in my wee youth and hated the local Rams and Dodgers. vr, Xei
Unfortunately, I haven't grown up, yet.
1A. Internet connection
2. USC football
3. Top Chef Reruns
4. The Office
5. Chuck
6. Lakers
1. Dodgers
2. Whoever's playing the Angels
3. Whoever's playing the Giants
4. Whoever's playing the Red Sox
5. Whoever's playing the Yankees
6. Whoever's playing some other NL West team
I have a bad feeling that "Whoever's playing the Cubs" is soon going to occupy position #7.
1 1/2. Dodgers
2. Notre Dame
3. 49ers
I will be rooting for the Angels.
If Long Beach State's basketball program gets back on track (here's hoping Munson can work that Gonzaga magic here), They'll probably get close. If I can find a way to convince the Big West to bring back football, well...
Back in the day when True Blue readers were still sucking on milk filled teats it was a tie between the Dodgers, Lakers, and Rams. I followed them all religiously. In my lifetime I'd have to say the Magic Lakers have given me the most joy of any team I followed and the Shaq/Lakers gave me the greatest game I've ever seen live. Yet the current incarnation would not make my top 10 of teams I follow. I've tried to recapture the magic but I get nothing. Even the Laker/Boston series evoked little emotion and I hated the Celtics with a passion once upon a time. It is a strange feeling.
For the record, I would pick Lincecum and it's not really close.
At this point, after seeing the likes of Jim Tracy, Grady Little, Bob Davie, Ty Willingham, Steve Mariucci and Mike Nolan, I really have little faith that a change in coaching is the solution.
But Phil Jackson does make me think otherwise.
Weis at least is supposed to recruit well. I just wish that translated somehow onto the field. I honestly don't expect the Irish to win another bowl game anytime soon. They would have to be the best team in the country to not be put over their heads in a bowl game.
I honestly don't know who I would want to come in instead. So I'm hoping they give him another year after this one. If we're going to be bad, at least the school could avoid paying two head coaches.
Current Standings.
1. Dodgers
2. Clippers
3. Gonzaga Basketball
4. Dodger Rays
5. Angels
32 Years ago.
1. Dodgers
2. Rams
3. Lakers
4. UCLA Basketball
5. Angels
2. USC Football
3. 49ers
4. Lakers
5. Rafael Nadal
I am more of a UVa sports well-wisher, at least for the moment.
Harden has fewer strikeouts, fewer games, fewer wins, no CGs, and has pitched half the innings as CC in the NL.
As for me, since I went to a school as an undergrad that was hardly a sports school (the div II San Francisco State, which used to have a great tradition in D2 football, which is now defunct, and track and field), so I don't have much to root for there, and went to an arts school for a master's, I fall back on the roots of my childhood, which means UCLA and UCSB.
I see your argument about CC having more innings and games, which is why I say Lincecum. Lincecum has done it for 39 starts, while CC has 13 and Harden 10 after tonight.
I was a Raiders fan growing up but when they moved I gave up on them.
"I think this kid probably could have pitched in the big leagues if we forced the issue pretty good," White said of the 2008 second-round Draft pick. "He's big and physical, he's got a really good makeup and his stuff is pretty impressive."
http://tinyurl.com/44a78x
The football program was retired the next year.
I liked George Allen because even though he was very disciplined he still ate ice cream every night. Then he died and made me look at my ice cream in a different way.
What a difference a good camping trip or two makes ;)
---
170 >>Andrew Lambo, .295, 18 homers, 91 RBIs, Class A Great Lakes and Jacksonville: "He can swing the bat a little bit," Watson said. "He's a good-looking hitter. He carried the club, and that's a pretty big burden for a 19-year-old kid playing with 22- and 23-year-old players, but the young man kept a consistent approach the whole year, stayed focused and executed. We have a guy on our big league club who was roughly doing some of the same things at the same time, age-wise."<<
Kemp, I assume?
That article should at least temporarily cheer Nate. It did me.
Another bad start or two from Webb and I think he might lock it up.
My favorite Dodger era is the 1974 to 1983 span with the same infield, Baker, Reggie Smith, etc.
My favorite Ram era was the Eric Dickerson days.
Great read
Big fan of Lawrence McCutcheon and Wendell Tyler. Saw Tyler beat the two time Heisman Trophy Archie Griffin Buckeyes at the Rose Bowl and was a huge fan ever since.
Anyone remember the incredible game that Willie Ellison had one Sunday?
1.UCLA Basketball
2.Lakers/Dodgers
3.Raiders
4.UCLA Football
5.San Jose Sharks
Raiders could definitely drop down to 4.
1. Dodgers (always have been, always will be)
t2. UCLA B-Ball & F-Ball
t2. Lakers (used to be a closer 2nd to the Dodgers)
4. Seahawks (My NFL team thru living in Puget Sound, Will never forgive the witch for killing the Rams here and taking them to StL.)
5. 4 way tie (Any team playing the Yankees, Angels, Notre Dame or the hated Gints)
Believe it or not, I can't quote the best line in full because it would be an infraction of the euphemism clause of Rule 1, so here it is edited (no clause yet on excisions, use your imagination):
"I'm reminded of [Pedro] Guerrero because I swear I'm seeing the reincarnation of that one-man Dodger blue wrecking crew in the form of Manny Ramirez right now, night after night after night. Ladies and gentlemen, in case you haven't been paying attention, know this: Manny Ramirez can [...] hit."
How much do you think Fielder will make in arbitration this year? $5 million? $7 million?
2)Auburn football
3)Lakers
4)Buffalo Bills
5) An obscure High School basketball team in Alabama
1. Dodgers and Hokies (tie)
3. Auburn
4. UVa's opponent
5. Browns
Ken the kid
1. Dodgers
2. Baltimore Colts
1. Dodgers
Off seasons suck.
2. Lakers
3. UCLA basketball/football
188 Was a big Rams fan, Lawrence McCutcheon, Youngblood, Olson, Brooks and Dryer. What about Cullen Bryant? Bob Klein, Harold Jackson, Ron Jessie.
Probably the biggest injustice to me was the Rams not making a Super Bowl with those teams. Sure they got there in 1979 but that was not one of their better teams.
I consider myself friendly towards the Clippers and Angels.
http://tinyurl.com/3vw87g
The Astros are being really stupid about this.
The Phils are currently beating the Brewers 4-3. Milwaukee has been playing about as badly as their division rivals, the Cubs, of late, so they really need to win here and put some distance between them and their Wild Card competition.
"The Cubs recognized the Astros did not want to leave their families in the Houston area to start the series at a neutral site on Friday. "
I kinda understand and agree with the Astros here. I wouldn't want to leave. If the hurrican hits hard like it's supposed to, it would be hard for them to focus on baseball.
How does a "Magic Number" move? Hypothetically speaking, assume the Dodgers magic number is 14 and the follow occurs:
Dodgers win, D'Backs lose. Does the number move from 14 to 13 or 12?
Dodgers win, D'Backs win. What happens to the number?
Dodgers lose, D'Backs lose?
Dodgers win; D'Backs idle?
Dodgers idle; D'Backs lose?
These magic number things are very tricky. As a Dodger fan I am not very familiar with them.
So any Dodger win will lower it by one, as will any D'Backs loss.
If both happen, the number drops two, one for each result.
So if tomorrow, the Dodgers win and Arizona loses, the number reduces by 2, if both teams win, the number reduces by 1, if both teams lose, the number reduces by 1, the only time the number does not go down is when the Dodgers lose and Arizona wins.
If a team is playing while the other is off, it would depend on if that team wins or loses but since that only happens once between now and the end of season (Monday Sept. 22nd, the Dodgers are off and the D-Backs are in St. Louis), it is not a real big issue.
For your hypothetical:
Case 1: Number drops from 14 to 12
Case 2: Number drops to 13
Case 3: Number drops to 13
Case 4: Number drops to 13
Case 5: Number drops to 13
182 . I forgot Tyler was a Ram before Dickerson. I only remember him as a 'Niner.
--
I had sort of forgotten until today that the Rams were my second favorite NFL team growing up, I loved everything from their Ram helmet design to Vince Ferragamo and then Eric Dickerson, and then... yeah, when they moved away I stopped caring entirely.
2. Lakers
3. Fantasy football team
4. Whatever team I am controlling on NCAA Football 09 for PS3.
But, the incredible story is the Houston Astros. They are up 5-0 over Pittsburgh in the fifth. If they hold on they also will only be three games out of the wildcard.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magic_number_(sports)
-- Michael Scott
1. Dodgers
1.1 USC Football
3. Lakers
4. Tiger
I think I'm 5-10% dumber than I was ten minutes ago. Time for my daughters to drop their Barbies and rescue me with a game of catch.
I assume Frank will want to resign Manny ($24M/yr 4 years).
He should resign Lowe ($14M/yr 3 years), but not Penny, Blake, Kent, Nomar or Furcal.
After paying all the arb increases (@$10.5M) and the post career monies owed ($11.7M) this does not leave much in the kitty.
Instead of resigning Blake for 3B we should play DeWitt at 3b and trade for a new 2B such as Brian Roberts for leadoff to freeup Kemp.
The trade would have to include Pierre +$4M for salary reasons. What players/prospects can we afford to lose that would make a trade palatable for the Orioles? They are interested in pitching.
Pierre + $4M
DeJesus
Stults
prospect
prospect
Who would you recommend?
1) Dodgers & Colts
-
-
2) UCLA Basketball/Football (will rise as I continue to learn the NCAA game and the team(
-
-
-
-
-
3) Pacers (I'm not a huge basketball fan, but this could be right below UCLA basketball if they were in such a horrible position. I don't need a winner by any means, but the actions of the team shows no idea for direction. If you think the Dodgers are bad, try being a Pacers fan.)
I am also slowly trying to work the LA Kings and Liverpool into this mix, but need to figure out a way to watch both NHL and EPL with more regularity before I really get attached.
2. Dodgers
3. UCLA Football
4. Lakers
Any team I am willing to sleep on concrete for 10 nights for has to be #1. Dodgers are 2nd, but very close. A few years ago the Lakers would have been higher, but I've grown apart from the NBA over the last few years.
Who do you like in the Auburn-LSU game?I think Auburn has a shot if they don't turn the ball over. Mississippi State will play them tough this weekend. Hoping for 7 in a row over the Bammers.
2. Montreal Canadiens.
1. Angels
1a. Dodgers, though heaven knows they make it difficult. Bad teams I could deal with; stupid management and ownership is another matter.
2. Dirtbags baseball. As you can imagine, I hate the new NCAA scheduling rules.
The office is always ironic.
Andre Ethier story by L.A. Times beat writer Dylan Hernandez
"You don't know what's going to happen tomorrow," Ramirez said he told Ethier, explaining why he should lighten up.
Step 1 in becoming a NFL fan.
Remember your team.
I think I'm coming out ahead of that relationship.
Dodgers @ Rockies
Billingsley (R) v. Francis (L) 6:05 p.m.
Kershaw (L) v. De La Rosa (L) 5:05 p.m.
Maddux (R) v. Cook (R) 12:05 p.m.
Reds @ Diamondbacks
Cueto (R) v. Webb (R) 6:40 p.m
Volquez (R) v. Johnson (L) 5:10 p.m.
Harang (R) v. Scherzer (R) 1:10 p.m.
Other NL Playoff Contenders
Braves @ Mets
Brewers @ Phillies
Cubs @ Astros
Also Lowe and Maddux are eating dinner together, but I don't think they are talking about pitching.
Tom Mack still hasn't moved.
But he's right, those teams were loaded except for the QB. My favorite all time football play was Ferragamo to Waddy over the middle to split the Cowboy defense and take me to the Super Bowl. Years of frustration broke on that play. I was recently married and my wife probably thought she had married a mad man. Years later she realized she had married a mad man and went for someone a little more sedate.
1. UCLA Hoops (1995 was the best sports season ever) Can't wait for Oct 15 every year.
2. Dodgers (1988 was almost as good)
3. UCLA football (been as high as 2 and as low as 5)
way down the list
4. Mariners. Season tickets with my kids who are really into it. Hoping for Kim Ng to rescue us.
Off the list: Rams (who were #2) and NFL football. Lakers and NBA basketball.
2. Lakers
3. Georgetown/UCLA Baseketball
4. Racing (Argie soccer)
5. Raiders
1) Rams
2) UCLA basketball
3) Dodgers
4) Lakers
Age 14:
1) Dodgers
2) Lakers
3) UCLA and Stanford
Age 18+
1) Dodgers
2) Stanford
3) Lakers
Err..Dru?
Someone mentioned how many people became Dodger fans because of Jackie Robinson. An older gentleman I know is a huge Dodger fan. He grew up here in Arkansas, which has been Cardinal country. He said after 1947, he and every other black in his part of the state, Crossett, were Dodger fans. He still keeps up with them.
1T. Angels
2. Lakers
3. BYU
4. Stanford
5. Oregon
6. Pac-10
7. Rams
When I was younger I also rooted for the Plunkett and Stabler Raiders but I hold no affection for them now. The Rams used to be #3 on the list.
Tou'll hear me talk about the Steelers here and on my own blog (http://tinyurl.com/673jj8). They happen to be tied for 3rd with USC football on my "passion" list.
---
Jon most definitely called the Astros to be this year's "Colorado Rockies".
You know, having September runs like this, does that mean the NL is just that bad?
The Astros and Colorado making a run at the end doesn't make the NL bad, as much as it illustrates there are no really dominating teams. Toronto in the American League is also putting on a run....I hope there is a way to get Furcal back to just see if he is really healthy.
That was the best pro football game I ever saw as a kid. I went to that game, I think it was against the Saints. I still remember Willie's stats: 26 carries, 247 yards, long 80. That 80-yard run was a sweep around the right side on third and long, then he had an awesome cutback with about 30 yards to go to totally fool the safety. That same game, Travis Williams of the Rams broke the record for the longest kickoff return (105 yards?) in a game. I think the final score was something like 45-28 Rams. I remained a Ram fan until they moved to St. Louis.
1) Dodgers
2) Lakers
3) USC (football and basketball)
4) Raiders
For me, the Dodgers are a clear #1, but it is interesting that:
a) my favorite athlete of all-time is Magic Johnson, and it's not really close
b) the worst loss I have ever experienced was USC losing the 2006 Rose Bowl
I would have thought the Dodgers would feature more prominently in those two factors.
Worse loss is actually funny, because while its a loss to New England, it was the regular season opener in 2004. For some reason, that one stung so much worse than the playoffs.
Best win, likewise, was 2006, and my favorite sporting moment of all time. Though Finley's Grand Slam comes close (I, sadly, missed most of 4+1 live)
1. dodgers
2. lakers
3. raiders
4. rams
5. LA Kings
6. 49ers
7. usc football
8. ucla basketball
hockey lost me, football's departure made me care less, usc and ucla not finding my gpa good enough for admission hurt.
-Magic Johnson press conference.
-Marty McSorley's stick incident game.
Three that are close:
-West leaving the Lakers
-O'Malley selling the Dodgers.
-The Rams leaving SO Cal.
I have never felt more of a sports sucker punch than November 7, 1991.
Apr-Sept Dodgers
Aug-Jan Bruin Football
Dec-March Bruin Basketball
I could use a little more overlap between Dodgers and Bruin Football.
I need no other teams and pay 'sports in general' little heed. I wish the Angels & Lakers well. I wish the Giants and USC chronic and acute embarrassment, along with Mark Riddley Thomas and also the politicians/bureaucrats that planned/approved past Metro routes in this town.
~40 years ago, it was the Rams of Roman Gabriel & the Dodgers of Wes Parker who got me into the sports page every morning before school.
1. magic johnson press conference (not even close)
2. o'malley sells to fox
3. piazza trade
4. gretzky trade to St Louis
5. rams/raiders leave
6. 94 baseball strike
Magic's announcement rocked me to the core. 2, 3, and 6 almost caused me to give up baseball. 4 and 5 pretty much ended my love affair with those sports.
2. Dodgers
3. Lakers
As much as I love the dodgers, going to UCLA simply puts it above everything else. I'm surprised there aren't more people that put their college as their first choice.
1. Dodgers
2. U. of Oregon football
3. U. of Oregon basketball
4. Tiger Woods in majors
5. Minnesota Twins (don't know why)
2. UCLA Basketball
3. NASCAR (Kyle Busch)
4. Clippers
5. UCLA Football
6. Rams
If I went to USC, or another school was D-1 sports, I would probably have the school at #1. I grew up liking USC, and went to UCSD (with no D-1 sports), so the Trojan allegiance continued.
I will be wearing a USC polo shirt to work tomorrow, and will also wear this button:
http://tinyurl.com/42ugdx
I wish I went to a school that taught me better grammar.
{lightning flash}
Executive Koala!
http://tinyurl.com/53ae4t
That puts his ERA+ right about 120. He has never had a season lower than 125 in his 8-year career.
Makes me think of Peter Jackson's Meet the Feebles combined with Miike Takashi's Happiness of the Katakuris.
2. Koufax retires
3. Laker losses to the Celtics in the 1960s
4. The tuck
5. UCLA losses to USC in football
2)
3) Dodgers
4) USC Football
5) Fresno State Football
5) Lakers
6) Galaxy
1(t). UTEP basketball
3. Longhorns basketball
4. UTEP football
5. Longhorns football
6. Longhorns baseball
That's it for me. Baseball is basically the only pro sport I follow.
This is why I say I am not a true hockey fan, because I first liked Kings, but once the Sharks came around I started to like them more.
But I think the Kings are 2 to 3 years away. Definitely built up the defense for the future.
Plus I loved the Mighty Ducks movies so I had a soft spot for them, which is gone now that they are just the Ducks.
71k's
5BB
1. Magic Johnson Press Conference
2. Dodgers lose Game 5 in 74
3. Dodgers Lose the 1980 TieBreaker Playoff Game
4. All of the Ram playoff losses to the Cowboys and Vikings
I was a junior in high school when I first saw it and I thought it was weirdest movie ever.
Sadly, now I don't find it very disturbing.
1. Vin simulcast Dodgers
2. Vin tv Dodgers
3. Dodgers
4. Flavor of the month
1960s, when I lived in a NY suburb:
1. Mets
2. Jets
3. Football Giants
4. UCLA football
5. UCLA basketball
I have no idea why I liked UCLA so much when I was a kid. I had no connection to LA til I moved here.
Now:
1. Dodgers
2. Cal football
3. UCLA Basketball
4. Angels
5. Football Giants
6. Chargers
7. Clippers
The Lakers used to be somewhere in the middle of the pack, but they've completely lost me. I root for them to lose. Ditto the Raiders and Rams, who I rooted for at various times.
http://www.dailybreeze.com/sports/ci_10444559
Sheesh.
That reads like the rant of a 14-year-old posted on dodgers.com.
2. UCLA football
3. Clippers
4. Dodgers
5. World Cup (soccer)
6. Team USA (basketball)
7. Lakers
This is an outsider looking in, but LA sure has a lot of jerk-offs who try to make a name for themselves with these rants against local teams that make no real sense.
If not, he needs to have his journalist credentials, high school diploma, college degree, marriage license, employment contract, and the right to vote revoked.
Date: September 15-October 15
Event: Mariners, Padres and Dodgers Instructional League
Time: 12:30 pm weekdays, 10 am weekends
Location: Peoria Sports Complex
Description: The Complex is proud to host our home teams of the Seattle Mariners and San Diego Padres along with the Los Angeles Dodgers for this year's instructional season. All games are played on the practice fields and are free to the public.
Contact Person: Complex Operations
Contact Phone: 623-773-8700
http://www.peoriaaz.com/
when I was young...
1. Dodgers
2. UCLA basketball
as I aged gracefully it changed to...
1. Dodgers
2. UCLA basketball
there are no Worst Days, they are just games played by overpaid kids who never grew up...but I sure enjoy watching them
1. Clemente plane crash
2. Koufax retires
3. '62 playoff with Giants-Game 3
4. '66 WS
5. Any Yankee WS win
Favorite teams
1. Dodgers
2. US Olympic team
3. UCLA Hoops
4. UCLA Football
5. Detroit Tigers
1 Dodgers
2 US Soccer MNT
3 Boca Juniors
4 UCLA football
5 LB State hoops
http://www.presstelegram.com/dodgers/ci_10442829
1) Dodgers
2) LA Kings
3) SF 49ers
4) UCLA Football/Basketball
5) LA Lakers
Seems like the higher up the list I go, the less recent success they have had outside of the Kings, who haven't ever won it all.
Oddly enough, none of them are in the sport I follow most closely, which is college football, but that is ruled by my enjoyment of most teams outside of my intense hatred of Alabama, Florida, Florida St., Ohio St., LSU, Texas, and Oklahoma.
1. Dodgers
2. Lakers
3. UCLA basketball/football
4. All my various fantasy teams
5. Cal football
6. Cleveland Browns (don't ask)
7. USC football
8. Clippers
9. CSUN basketball
10. Kings
http://deadspin.com/5048707/mariotti-to-tribune-apparently-just-a-matter-of-when-not-if
1965 UCLA 20 USC 16
1966 Orioles
Tom Niedenfuer
Don Nelson
1969 Vikings 23 Rams 20
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-coliseum12-2008sep12,0,1206016.story
Lynch says he expects to finance more work by selling naming rights for an estimated $4 million to $6 million annually, a deal that could be finalized in a year or so.
1/1/66
1/1/76
1/1/86
Notice a pattern here.
1) NY football Giants
2) Dodgers
3) University of Portland Basketball
4) Clippers
5) Kings
1) US MNT
2) UNLV hoops
3) Dodgers
(loads of room here)
4) Celtics (I remember someone in here stating once that Celtics-Dodger fans seemed incongruent somehow -- in my case, it's a product of coming of sports age in the early 80s and first paying serious attention during a big Celtics year)
Lowest sports moments:
1) (can barely even type this): Duke over UNLV, 1991
2) Czech Republic 3, US 0 (traveled to see the opener of the '06 WC, witnessed the carnage in person)
3) Niedenfuer!
4) The baby hook
Let's see-
Wal Mart Coliseum
Microsoft Coliseum
General Electric Coliseum
Honda Coliseum
None of these sound right.
1. Dodgers
2. AC Fiorentina (italian soccer)
3. Marlins
4. Jets/Chargers/Seahawks
5. Azzurri (most of the time...)
6. underdogs.
Dude, Manny is putting up a 1.264 OPS and a 2.02 RF/.910 ZR for the Dodgers right now.
It's your call, but sometimes it's nice to stop and smell the roses for a moment.
3 Manny's in the clubhouse could be a problem but you would score a lot of runs.
It's not that I don't appreciate Manny. I do. It's that this isn't the Manny the Dodgers OR ANYONE ELSE will get going forward. He will cool down.
Bandini Coliseum
Jack Stephan Coliseum
King-Drew Coliseum
Jack Stephanino Coliseum?
2.UCLA Basketball
3.Lakers
4.UCLA Football
5.England (rugby and football)
6.SMU football (i hope this jumps 5 someday)
7.Tottenham Hotspur
What does the article say!
Insane, no.
But when a future first-ballot Hall of Famer is playing some of the best baseball of his career for your team, it may not be the worst thing in the world to just sit back for a moment and enjoy it.
Pierre, Schmidt, Jones, Kuroda, Manny - these are not zigs and zags. They're all part of the same plan. The main problem is that it has taken Colletti three attempts to fill one outfield spot and at least two attempts to fill one starting pitching slot.
But the plan has been consistent: develop young talent, supplement it with veteran talent.
I'd argue this is a good plan. There's no law that says your team has to be 25 home-grown players. The problem is that they've often made some obvious mistakes in going outside the organization.
This might be a semantics argument, but that's how I see it. I think it's fair to seriously worry about the future of the Dodgers. But the biggest problem with the Dodgers under Colletti has been judging what talent is. In the case of Manny, he (or he and McCourt) did get it right. Yes, it came at a price, but still, at least it wasn't flushed down the drain with no reward. I think we can be happy about that and still worry about the future.
That will test a few of the youngins here.
Day to day.
He's skipping the Japanese leagues completely.
Billingsley
Kuroda
Kershaw
Tazawa
???
1. Lakers (West & Goodrich my first sports heroes)
2. UCLA Basketball (Wooden coached purity and excellence-enough said)
3. Rams
4. Dodgers (Still catching the fever)
5. USC Football
By age 20 - 1980-81
T1 - Lakers (Showtime era With Magic-best team Basketball I've ever seen play)
T1 - Dodgers (fully engrossed in Dodger tradition-glory and heartbreak)
2. UCLA Basketball(struggles after Wooden retires-Larry Brown almost pulls off miracle in 1980)
3. Rams Football (Reach Super Bowl finally - but bad days ahead after owner Carroll is killed off)
Currently:
1. Dodgers (Now an obsession)
2. Lakers (Still love them-but NBA image has lost its luster with me)
3. UCLA Basketball (revived with Howland)
4. USC Football (Carroll has made USC fun to watch again)
5. Angels (former Dodger catcherScioscia - one of best field managers in the game. Malone's biggest blunder as GM)
6. NFL Football (No favorite teams technically-root for great QB and consistent teams that have a plan and execute well-enjoy watching exciting competitive games)
Worst moments:
1. Magic's press conference 11/7/91 (I was in a depressed state for weeks). The next worst day that has happened since in the world to me was 9/11!)
2. Dodger's loss in 78 WS to Yankees thanks to Reggie hip in game 4 changing momentum of the series.
3. Lakers '84 series loss to Celtics that the Lakers gave away in games 2 and 4 with leads late in games.
4. Dodgers '85 NLCS loss to Cards Game 6 - Jack Clark - "Why did you pitch to him, Tommy"?
5. USC's loss in the Rose Bowl to Texas when they could not defend Vince Young.
That is my list!!
Wouldnt he need some seasoning in the minors?
The 2-3 Rams playoff losses to the Vikings in the 70's that were played in Minnesota in 1970, 74 and 76 I believe. Each game turned because of a referee's blown call at a critical juncture and the Rams lost despite dominating the statistics of the game. The Vikings became one of my two most hated football teams because of those questionable losses. My other hated team was the Oakland Raiders due to some of the cheap late hits they took that they seemed to relish even if it ended someones career (See Darryl Stingley). You would think the Cowboys of that era would have been the other hated team but the beat the Rams fair and square in those playoff games, in fact clobbered the Rams in LA 37-7. No complaints there about referees, the Cowboys came in and layed a butt-whooping that day. The Vikings always needed the referees help and that is why they were always overmatched when they got to the Super Bowl and got thumped. They didn't belong in the first place.
If Laker Thoughts existed back in the early 1970s, there would be some guy complaining that he missed Elmore Smith.
He has a great contract. Unless he is not a fan of the LA area, I can't imagine walking away from that.
Obviously, Manny for LaRoche/Morris has been an amazing deal for us so far. But it's only mid-September. We've clinched nothing, and if the Dodgers end up getting bounced in the first round, then what? Is the trade still a success? As soon as the season ends the proceeds from the trade will look like this: no Manny, no LaRoche, no Morris, no title. At least the Red Sox will still have Bay next year, entering his prime years. That's the kind of player you want to trade prospects for (Josh Beckett was another).
Even if we re-sign Manny, we get his decline years instead of him HoF years, and we get to pay a premium for it. But I don't trust Colletti to be able to competently replace that offense using the free-agent market, so for Dodger fans, our hands our tied and whether or not to re-sign Manny. We need it to happen.
We can all argue the merits and execution of that plan - I sure have, plenty of times - but I don't know how you can say that there isn't any plan at all.
2. Newcastle United Football Club
3. Lakers (was #1 when I was a kid and Chick was alive)
4. Cornell Hockey
5. Longhorns Football
6. Cowboys
7. Oregon Basketball/ Longhorns Basketball
8. Kings (was #2 when I was a kid)
If the Dodgers win the World Series, I'll be thrilled, but I'll still have a mixed at-best evaluation of Colletti. I'll still feel some people could have been worse than him and some (more) could have been better.
Martin, Kemp, Ethier and the rest of them will be hitting their free agency years before we know it. They grow up so fast...
I think we can do it with Loney, Kemp, and Ethier. Martin already expressed an desire to test his arbitration years, and eventually FA, not that the Dodgers can't resign him, but he likely won't accept an extension. I think that's one of the bigger problems I have with Ned. He'll sign expensive Free Agents but doesn't see the value of cost control for younger players. Especially when big years like Ethier is currently experiencing will jack up their arbitration numbers.
Dodgers go to Denver with a record of 79-70 and send Bills to the mound vs Francis.
If things are still bad Sunday and they have to cancel that too and Monday's doubleheader, there's been no announcement yet of what would happen. Since there are no more days off during the season, and only a couple of days at the end before playoffs - and, who knows, a one-day playoff between Cubs and Brewers might also have to be scheduled if they tie and Mets or Phillies manage to become the wild card (unlikely, but you never know) - I'd guess that they'd have to relocate the Sunday and Monday games in another city, on schedule. But no one knows.
Perhaps my greatest high was the 1966 Rose Bowl where Bob Stiles knocked himself out stopping Michigan State from scoring and preserving the 14-12 victory. They were huge underdogs.
One other highlight I still remember was when my Dad took me to a game at the Sports Arena between the Lakers and the Cincinnati Royals. The Royals had Oscar Robertson and Wayne "The Tree" Embry. At halftime, the Lakers were down about 24 points. They came back in the 2nd half with West and Baylor both scoring over 40 points. West hit a jumper at the buzzer to send it into overtime. Baylor drove for a layup at the buzzer to send it into double overtime. They won it in the 2nd overtime. It was the greatest game I've ever been to.
The 1988 Dodgers still remain one of the great highlights.
Now, my favorite team is the Dodgers. I no longer follow the NFL. I really don't care that much any more about the Lakers, and only casually follow UCLA and USC football.
Real life is depressing enough without working at being bummed out.
How many people remember Putnam on his horse riding down Orange Grove Avenue in the Rose Parade? Despite his ultra conservative views he was my Grandmother's favorite broadcaster.
Is their a plan with bad execution or is their no plan is a question I asked quite a bit last year and the start of this year. I tend to side with Jon's explanation, but do wonder if Ned is capable to really make the plan work and start to buy out some of the FA years of the young players. If in the next year or two the core of our young talent is not signed we could take a large step back. IMO many of the young Dodgers are special, but not all young players develop into Ethier or Kemp or Bills.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.