Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Two primary situations cause me to yell at my kids.
The first is fear of them getting hurt. Saturday, for example, while my wife worked, I took advantage of an invitation to a Staples Center suite and brought my kids there. The Clippers happened to be playing, but that wasn't why I was going. The reasons were to spend time with the friend who invited me, and to be in a confined space where I could patrol all three of my children.
Except you realize once you get there that the space isn't entirely confined. The Plexiglas in front of the suite is so low, a dachshund could see over it. That consterned me throughout the game, which I was hardly able to pay any attention to, though for the most part the kids were good.
Then, in the fourth quarter, while I held the baby, while my daughter gabbed with her schoolmate, my 4-year-old stood on the ledge to the right of the second row of seats, with a smile. And I could read his mind. He was going to try to jump and land on the ledge right in front of the first row of the suite, fronted only by that low window of Plexiglas. And if he didn't stick the landing, if he stumbled forward, he was going to tumble right out of the suite down to the level below.
I yelled his name. I screamed, "No! No! NO!!!" He took off in the air, and he landed on his two feet.
I practically dropped the baby - I laid him down with such haste that his head knocked against the base of a chair. I scrambled over the seats and grabbed my elder son before he got any other ideas.
I lectured him, sternly, emotionally, angrily, almost tearfully but most of all, hopelessly. I lectured him that he had to listen, that the word "No" was a no-holds-barred stop sign that he had to obey. It's a lecture that I've given him on a different scale hundreds of times now, over matters much less perilous, precisely because I wanted him to make sure he listened to me when it really mattered.
It doesn't work. I keep doing it, but it doesn't work. I don't remember ignoring my father hardly ever in my lifetime, but my son does it a number of times each day. After I finished with him, exasperated, I went to the back of the suite, trying to collect myself - and kicked a cabinet. (Even at a Clipper game, where exasperation is par for the course, this gets noticed.)
The frustration is getting to me. I know he's only 4. I know. I'm trying to do what the books and the sage and my head all tell me, with timeouts and 1-2-3 and not getting emotional. But this kid nearly leaped out of a suite without a net; before that he nearly rode his trike into a street. He's a wonderful boy, but he's got a mind of his own and then some. He has to have what he wants and do what he wants to do. And the fear that it churns inside me makes me lose it and yell at him, because nothing is working and I don't want him to end up in the hospital or worse.
The second reason I yell at my kids is out of impatience. If the previous scenario can at least in part be excused as selfless concern, this second situation is more selfish. Yes, I want the kids to brush their teeth the first time I ask, so that they get to bed on time and get enough sleep for the next school day, but I also want them to do it so that I can get to the things I need to do - like Dodger Thoughts, for example.
If I surrender to the kids, if I turn off the clock and just let the pace dictate the pace, it makes a huge difference. If I do all that, I relax. But it's not automatic. The baby is up by 6 a.m., and with that I'm on the clock, either at home or at work, until my 6-year-old daughter turns out her light at 8 or 8:15 p.m. That doesn't leave me much time to attend to the rest of my life. The pressure builds, and I have to make a conscious decision how to deal with it. Sometimes, it's hard to convince myself to surrender. One day it can feel so easy, and the next it feels so difficult.
Either way, I've already yelled at my kids more than my parents ever yelled at me. In that respect, I'm 180 degrees from the dad I want to be. I can't tell you how ashamed I am of this. I want these kids to be good people, but I have to be more willing to let them make more mistakes. I'm too demanding, too proactive, too protective, too paranoid. I need to toughen up, by letting go.
Over the past few years, I think I've already achieved this with the Dodgers. It takes the extreme to make me angry. I offer my opinion, I react, but mostly it's live and let live, hoping for the best, often settling for something less. Before I started this website, I think Dodger lows got to me more than the highs. Now, it's the reverse. The good moments truly elate me, the bad stuff goes away.
It's not a coincidence that since 2002, the year that Dodger Thoughts and my first child were both born, my kids became the real pennant race. But I have to accept that winning and losing are both inevitable. I don't want to be the brat kicking dirt at the umpire. I want to be the guy who accepts defeat with grace and calm and looks straight ahead to the next game.
Remembered, if outlived,
As Freezing persons, recollect the Snow
First Chill then Stupor then the letting go.
Unrelated to the post content, but it's a top five favorite poem (and the inspiration of one of the more important albums of my life).
Thank you.
If any of my Dodger brothers are in interested in some Oakley sunglasses I was able to pick up quite a few today. Over 50-60% off, never been worn. Just email me @ jbraden@vsrlogistics.com.
My grandmother passed away this morning. Her last thoughts, communicated to my mother last night, were simply: "my children have all been so good. Don't cry--be happy." This comes from the 90 year-old mother of 5 girls and 1 boy, who herself grew up in Karachi in what's now Pakistan, lost everything and moved to Delhi in 1948, and lived the last 15 years of her life here in LA--and all of her kids grew up to do great things themselves, and all of their kids (if I do say so) have done pretty well too. Her entire focus was not on her own imminent passing, but pride in her children and concern for their happiness.
So that's grandma. My dad passed away last year at 85, after a similarly full life. He was particularly interesting because he was an incredibly successful professional and bragged about his kids all the time to those outside the family--yet we were constantly berated at home because it seemed like every time we did something that was the slightest bit not HIS WAY, we'd get yelled at. Now, he was certainly a control freak and had insecurity issues, but it did mean that despite his incredible love for us, he was very hard to live with. It really doesn't sound like you're on this level, but his need for control really affected his relationships with the people closest to him.
I'm 25 and single, so I have no knowledge of parenting except for my experience. But I do know that for whatever reason, I cried more for my grandmother today than for my father last year.
I saw the movie Joshua this weekend. Between that and Jon's story, I am thinking I will not be ready for kids until I am 40.
Good news: I'm hearing Moser to UCLA along with a few other people!!
The fact that he all of a sudden was willing to commit during the early signing period after his visit to UCLA was a good sign.
I was talking to a friend yesterday, who had one docile child and two strong-willed ones. She is now grateful for the ones who were disobedient at an early age, because they ended up being very open with their feelings, so she is on really good terms with them. The one who was "easy", who always went along with what she said, is now realizing he wants to be his own person and takes no advice at all. Sometimes you don't know your blessings until much later in life.
Finally, I have learned that I can't do everything I want to do. If I try to do the most important things each day, then I can go to bed knowing that, although I let some stuff slide, it wasn't the most important things to me.
Then, I asked my dad recently how he was able to stay calm so much when we were kids. He was kind of amused because in his estimation, he yelled too much at us when we were kids.
thankfully, my recollection was different than his. So I'm hopeful that if I can improve, my children's recollection of their relationship with me will be equally positive.
I guess what I'm saying is that I think if we are generally trying to be restrained, our kids remember the positive and seem to forget the negative. Or at least that's how I comfort myself in my parenting mediocrity... Thanks for your words and example...
I know people with kids usually say that the benefits are worth the costs. While I am sure that some people really feel that way, I also tend to think that some people say that because they don't want to face and/or admit the alternative. They love their kids and realize they can't undo having them, but some part of them kinda wonders what it would have been like if they had chosen a different path in life.
Knowing myself as well as I do, I am quite comfortable believing that the costs would outweigh the benefits, and that I place too much value on my autonomy and freedom (especially with respect to how I spend my time) to be happy giving that up in exchange for having a kid or kids to take care of. Plus, I tend to feel like I get many of the benefits of having kids from animals instead, which is particularly true because I like animals more than kids. (And when the cats are being annoying, I can just put them outside, something you can't really do with a kid).
On a related note: my wife and I have spent the past 5 or so years watching all of our friends have kids, and pretty much losing our friendships in the process. It hasn't been fun.
14. I believe that you are right that some people do regret having kids because of the the loss of autonomy, and I think for some people it just wasn't the right time, or they just don't have the type personality for which it would ever have been the right time. I think the key is to know yourself well enough to make a good decision and to be comfortable with what you decide no matter what. As for losing your friends, I had the opposite situation. I had kids about 5-years before any of my other friends did, and lost them all at once. I wonder which one is harder, the dripping away of one set of friends at a time, or the ripping off the band-aid of losing them all at once.
Did you end up making friends with other people (especially, other people with kids), or did you just not have any friends at all?
I know what you mean. It's a very sensitive subject. In my field (land use and environmental planning), it seems pretty clear that just about every problem we're trying to solve is exacerbated by increases in population, such that "the best thing" one can probably do from the standpoint of protecting the environment, avoiding climate change, etc. etc. etc. is to not have kids.
But that's a message most people (including many people who are otherwise committed to "green" causes) don't want to hear, and it's a message that has a good chance of bringing about much harm to the messenger.
Most of the world (including the US) looks at the decision to have as many kids as you want as a personal, private decision over which other people should have no influence.
All true. I never offer parenting advice, and can't really imagine a scenario in which I would. For one thing, no one ever asks me for it, for which I'm grateful. I think the notion that there's a "right way" to parent such that problems will either be avoided or eliminated when they arise is probably misguided anyway.
Not unlike marriage, parenting is not something to be mastered, but rather something to just work through, one day at a time, with much need for patience, tolerance, and grace.
My dad was the same way with me, often yelling at me in frustration. His tones were more of exasperation rather than anger and now I find myself using those same tones with my stepdaughter. I used to tell myself that I wouldn't be that way with my children, but the reaction is so instinctive that I do it without even thinking. My stepdaughter is great in many ways but her tendancy to move at her own pace without regard to time or schedules infuriates me to no end. I really wonder what it is that goes through her mind in the mornings as she meanders through the same routine to get ready for school as if it is the first time she has ever done it. Her disregard for her possessions also gets me going as she is apt to leaving socks and shoes just lying about knowing full well that we have a dog that loves to chew up such things.
I wonder sometimes if my approach would be different with my own son or daughter as opposed to my stepdaughter and it will certainly be something that I will have to be cognizant of if we happen to have another child. As a stepfather I feel that I ride a fine line, though that line is disappearing with time, and that I am depowered sometimes as my wife trumps me in certain situations. I am already preparing for the day when she says that she doesn't have to listen to me because I am not her father. I have supported everthing she has done and pushed her to try to do things the right way since she was 4 years old and it will be crushing to hear those words.
This is why I love coming here to read the posts, it is more than just a mutual affection for a baseball team. It is the realization that others are facing the same struggles that I face and a reminder that I should try even harder to break bad habits that I let myself fall into.
Our friends also seem to understand that having a family changed the demands on our time, and they adjusted to our situation
The friendships have changed but continue to endure.
FWIW, we raised quite a few eyebrows in the family stopping at one child. Someone's always there to disapprove, whatever the choice.
I think our friends with kids do make some effort to talk about other things, but part of the problem is that when we're together, their kids dominate the encounter whether the parents intend for them to or not. If the kids are awake, they're running around making noise and being distracting. Or, one or both of the parents is involved in feeding them. If it's time for the kids to go to bed, one or both of the parents is involved in bathing them, reading bedtime stories, etc. Plus, the kids don't fall asleep right away, so one or both of the parents has to go in and be with the kid for long periods of time. It makes it difficult to really engage in conversations and such.
We feel like our friends our pretty much gone, and have been replaced by other people that we don't have nearly as much in common with anymore. They have been transformed from bright, intelligent, thoughtful people to virtual slaves who don't really have lives of their own. It's probably not fair for me to feel this way, but I kind of feel betrayed by them and a little resentful.
Two of our friends in particular can't bear to be apart from their kids. The mother is especially unable to cut the cord, even for an hour or so.
Absolutely. I have seen it often. People with university degrees in literature all of a sudden never have time to read a book that isn't a "children's book." People who used to see serious films and follows good TV series, and could talk engagingly about them, one day don't know anything outside of Sesame Street and SpongeBob SquarePants, or whatever its called. It's like the people you thought you knew were, out of the blue, replaced by pod people from Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.
20 One thing I've learned from parenting that I didn't know before I became a parent is that it's the child that dictates what kind of parent you're going to be, far more than the other way around. Your parenting philosophies go out the window once that reality hits you. That's why outside parenting advice usually isn't welcome. Whatever you think the parent is doing wrong, well, the parent would probably rather not be doing it that way, either.
My first kid is straight out of the textbooks--you scold her in a calm voice with a rational explanation, and she feels guilty and stops doing whatever she was doing. Oh, this parenting thing is easy, I thought.
My second kid was the complete opposite. Calm, rational explanations are utterly useless--they flow off her like water off a duck's back. She's a creature of emotion, very empathic, and if I want a lesson like "don't jump off ledges" to sink in with her, I have to get angry with her. She needs that transfer of emotion, to know that I'm angry, before she gets it.
People who see me getting angry with her are often surprised--I am usually the calmest person in any room I'm in. But that's what works, so that's the role I play. Believe me, I'd prefer the rational expanation path any day of the week.
Now I've got a third kid, and I'm figuring out a completely new set of rules about what works and what doesn't. Parenting is the ultimate improv class.
I may be speaking out of turn here, but is your resentment something they sense, that exacerbates the problem?
Ironically, one of our male friends with 2 new kids is getting a PhD in English Lit at Duke, and the female has a law degree. But now if seems like their brains are wasting away. The female (who instigated the having kids thing) shocked us recently when she said that she had nothing going on in her life.
There would be pleated pants, C-SPAN, and bemused looks all around.
I'm not 100% sure, but I think they couldn't have helped but sensed a change in our attitude toward them. Like you, they typically stay in now instead of going out, which means that our interactions are almost always us going to their house. We never initiate these interactions, in part because we want to let them work out their own schedules and don't want to pressure them. But it's also true that we don't enjoy being around them as much as we used to.
I agree with you that there's a 2-way street involved, and I willingly accept some of the blame. But the thing is: I don't really care whether we're friends with them or not anymore, so I don't feel like putting out much effort.
That might get the attention of Child Protective Services.
My wife gets mad because I sometimes say Ben, will be the death of me. But I really think he'll give me a heart attack one day. I just hope it's a long time from now.
I agree with what you say, but in this case, she was really expressing that her life was pretty dull and depressing. Which annoyed us, because she was the one who wanted to have kids in the first place. It's tempting to be petty in those situations, and think "You got what you wanted, so be happy with it."
And the need for that kind of yelling seems to have decreased (at least in my case). Take heart! In time, real conversations will take place and that independent streak in your 4-yr-old may blossom into a strong young mind.
One example was my dad was a hunter and liked to reload his shotgun shells rather than buy new ones so the garage always had kegs of gunpowder lying around. My brother and I used to amuse ourselves by trailing it up and down the driveway and then setting it on fire, usually ending in a conflagration of melting army men.
I got yelled at a lot and threatened a lot but always felt loved.
I definitely think she didn't know what she was getting into, but even that really bothers me, because I think the downsides of having kids are so obvious and predictable that (in my mind) there's really no excuse for being surprised by them.
It may be a character flaw, but as a general rule, I have a hard time sympathizing with people who voluntarily do things that will bring about predictable hardships, when they could have just as easily not done those things. If you're going to make your bed, you can't complain about having to lie in it. But maybe I'm wrong.
48 - I suspect that there are many Ph. D candidates who find their lives dull and depressing at some point during their studies.
In the end, there are no guarantees of happiness, but just because you're depressed at one point doesn't mean it was a mistake.
I agree. I don't mean to imply that pursuing an "intellectual" career and not having kids will necessarily bring about a "better", happier life than the alternative.
:P
The Shimmerman Shackle! I like it.
D4P, I appreciate your opinion on this topic, and I think it is quite valid. We had 4 couples have kids a few years before us, and it changed a lot of things for us as friends. I think I learned from that experience quite a bit. Now the majority of people that we spend time with do not have kids. This isn't intentional, but it just sort of happened. If anything, these are the people who have more flexibility to spend time together. We do make a point of going to their homes as well as having them over to ours. But, I must say the easiest part about it has been their willingness to take part in the kid activities...reading books, playing with him, feeding, changing diapers, etc. I am surprised at how eager they have been to do this, and it has made it quite wonderful for all of us involved.
Finally, as to the debate of whether to have kids or not, it's 100% a personal choice. There is not a single cell in my entire body that regrets my son. He is by far the greatest thing that's ever happened to me and it's not even close. People who don't have kids can never truly understand the bond that forms when you've cared for someone from the first second they were alive--even before. I still consider the day I heard my son's heartbeat to be the first day of being a parent.
65
There are many people out there who don't have kids of their own, but love to be honorary "aunt" or "uncle" to their friend's kids. I am one such person, and I absolutely ADORE my best friends two kids (I'm "Aunt Diane"). That being said, I know I don't have the temperment to be a full-time, 24/7 mom.
I advocate adopting someone who is older than you, and preferably wealthy.
TULIP
T- Total commitment to Dodger fandom
U- Unconditional angst
L- Limited patience for GM moves
I- Irresistible call to the ball park
P- Preservation of the possibility for success the next year.
I have a hard time sympathizing with people who voluntarily do things that will bring about predictable hardships, when they could have just as easily not done those things.
I think that's fairly common, but I had an discussion/argument with a friend over it--in this case, the hardships of going to school without a lot of money.
I think that while it's a fairly common trend, it should be met with a bit of suspect--many of life's decisions come with highs and lows, and if a person is relating a low, there is a certain degree of sympathy or understanding to greet it with. It's not as though the person is saying "This entire part of my life is a bad thing," but that it's going through a bad phase, something we all have in common.
And believe me, you are appreciated for it!
There was that really weird case in San Francisco a few years back where a woman was killed by a dog, which was owned by two criminal defense attorneys who had adopted one of their former clients, who was doing life in Pelican Bay, as their child.
"Not unlike marriage, parenting is not something to be mastered, but rather something to just work through, one day at a time, with much need for patience, tolerance, and grace."
It's a great observation, especially from someone who doesn't have children. I agree that no one wants your advice, but I also agree that they probably don't want advice from other parents either. I've seen my wife and I turn into hypocrites more than once on a parenting issue that we didn't fully understand until it happened to us.
When my oldest was only 3, I used to yell a lot and threaten various punishments that never materialized. Now if I only threaten things I am prepared to actually do, but I do it less, and it seems to work.
By the way, if anyone's having fertility issues, I'd recommend heading up to San Jose. The place is lousy with kids. At breakfast yesterday, there was a stroller at each table within a thirty foot radius of mine. We were near a farmers' market, too, which I thought was very clever--bring your kids to a farmers' market and the most trouble they can get into is stealing a vegetable.
We were near a farmers' market
We...?
The Raiders could draft him after a pretty good college career at USC.
Ah. I thought maybe you were referring to your pens.
The surest way to keep a friend who has kids is to take an active interest in their kids. It's pretty easy to do, too, since the minute things become difficult (e.g. they start crying), the responsibility is on the parents to comfort them.
69 Being a foster parent is an amazing thing to do for a child in need, and I hope to do it myself some day.
I'm the young uncle (all my brothers and sisters are older than me by a decent amount), and I have four nieces currently in college of whom I used to changed diapers. It's kind of weird.
It would be weirder if you STILL changed their diapers while they were at college.
That's true. That would be perhaps the most needlessly elaborate scheme ever to try to get into a female college dorm hall.*
*However, in this case, all four nieces live at home. :)
In a recent interview with a local radio show, Colletti was asked about Andruw Jones showing up to camp out of shape in 2008. Colletti stated the Dodgers have a personal trainer currently with Jones in his home in Atlanta and his 2008 shape was basically unacceptable. He also stated Jones signed his name to a contract that states he must be in top physical shape. In 2008, he obviously wasn't in peak shape. If he shows up in 2009 looking very similar, is there anything the team can do to penalize him, such as suing him or voiding the contract?
-- Steve S., Los Angeles
(Gurnick:) Paragraph 3.(a) of the uniform players contract states that the player must "keep himself in first-class physical condition." If the club attempted to void the contract for that reason, it would be fought tenaciously by the Players Association, which has proved over the years to be extremely successful defending the players. That doesn't mean it won't happen with so much money at stake. If your scenario plays out, the club could choose to release Jones, rather than go through a repeat of the 2008 disaster, and/or attempt to fight the player for the remaining $21.2 million on the contract.
http://tinyurl.com/5z5lm4
(Weisman:) I still don't see any chance of Jones losing on these grounds.
On a related note, I find the non-traditional bonds depicted on "The Wire" among the most moving in screen history: Michael's care for his younger brother, Bug; Cutty's attachment to his boxing disciples; Colvin's taking in of Nayman, etc. In terms of raising kids, it doesn't matter how it gets done as long as it gets done.
perhaps we can call it
Diaper Dandies (with a cameo from Dick Vitale)
Unless they identify tangible ways to measure condition, that clause seems pointless. It's particularly meaningless if Andruw Jones didn't violate it.
This is definitely in the category of "it has to be yours".
I was grossed out by the thought before, but now that it is my own child, it doesn't bother me at all...same with spit up.
I didn't mind doing it, but my concern was always the tightness of the diaper. On one hand, I wanted the diaper to stay on, to avoid any messy situations around the house. On the other hand, I didn't want to make the diaper so tight as to restrict the child. I probably worried about this way too much.
Last weekend, I saw a friend I've known since junior high school and he has two kids (2 & 4). He actually changed the diaper of his 2-year old while the kid was standing. My jaw was agape. He prefers the upright style because it minimizes the fussiness of his kid, and yet the structural integrity of the diaper was sound! I had never seen this majestic move before. Is this common nowadays?
--
Back to baseball for a sec, so now the Giants are interested in Joe Beimel, too? How many Dodgers will they try to sign this off-season?
http://tinyurl.com/58jfvt
Collecting former Dodgers is the key to victory. Ask the 2006 Mets!
I was thinking of using the title, "Huggies and Kisses," but I like yours!
My wife and I got married later in life than most and while that has a lot of advantages, fertility is not one of them. We did manage to have one wonderful daughter, who has just entered high school, before finally accepting the fact that she would be our only child.
When single and pre-child most of my friends we about my age. As my daughter began getting involved in sports and art and other age related activities we gained many new friends, most of whom are 10-15 years younger than I am. Which is OK except they know nothing about 60's culture.
I love my wife deeply and we would have a great life without our daughter. Having said that, having her has brought both of us joy that we never would have experienced. I wouldn't trade a minute of it.
Jon, I understood your fear at Staples. When my daughter was 10 I almost lost her to a bicycle/auto accident in China. She was 15 feet from me and I could not do a thing to help her. It turned out OK, she wasn't hit, but I was a mess for a couple of days and I can still see that moment.
As she has gotten older I have to turn her loose more and more. It's not always easy but I have to trust that what we have instilled in her over the years will lead her to do the right things and that she will make good decisions. So far so good and she has better judgement at her age than I did at 10 years older, mostly thanks to her mom.
Thanks for a great post and for all those who have added their thoughts and experiences.
Underdog, one of the joys of diaperdom is the sport of the disposal of said diaper. If there are family or friends around, you can experience the glee of threatening to throw the diaper at them. Or, at the very least toss a well-wrapped package to them to throw away, if only to see the abject fear in their eyes as an object of doom hurls toward them. :)
OK, back to your orange juice now.
No pullups for me! I'm old school. :)
But not too old school to be horrified when I learned some years ago that I was raised wearing cloth diapers. That whole concept seems really gross to me. Imagine my anxiety trying to close a cloth diaper!
I think Pujols will win a close vote over Howard. Manny will finish much too high.
Oh yeah, and I wonder if CC will fare better in MVP voting than he did in CYA voting. Some of the in-season arguments for CC seemed to favor him for MVP rather than CYA, regardless of logic.
Plus the AL MVP seems up in the air. I wonder how many different players will get 1st place votes.
This has not happened to me yet, but I will be the one in charge of that, and I will probably have to clean up the vomit from my wife, since she can't handle it.
Keith Hernandez had 10 first place votes, compared to only 4 for Willie Stargell, yet they shared the award.
I love your writing. Thanks so much.
Wow, that's pretty amazing.
For some reason I read that comment as "2nd VORPiest position player in the league". Manny was 12th in the NL overall. Still amazing, but not quite as such.
I thought it was supposed to be at 11am? Haven't all the other awards been announced at 11?
At least he didn't greet you with:
Woke up this morning,
Got myself a gun ...
Record him singing the song on video and then show it the first time he has a girlfriend over. (Or boyfriend, as the case might be).
Diapers are rough some times, but I really hate the snappy pajamas.
http://writersalmanac.publicradio.org/index.php?date=2005/09/21
As a new father reading this discussion, it really is fascinating to see all of the viewpoints and note potential traps.
Nothing but pain and heartache awaits you there.
were you intending on using the word "smell" there? :-)
;-)
But that does sound like fun, I'll admit.
And thanks for the tip in 136 . My ballot box stuffing worked!
--
MC, my sympathies to you and my admiration for sticking things out. The people around you who are stable and supportive and familial are the ones that become all the more valuable in situations like that. Makes you appreciate them all the more.
One thing that does work with him, and I wanted to put this out there in case it helps any parents of toddlers is I have this system of counting to three and he has to listen to what I am saying or he goes and spends time in his sister's crib (which he loathes, but won't dare climb out by himself). So, if he is clutching his sister's arm tight and won't let go, I have to say "1.." and he will let go. I've had to punich him once or twice by putting him in the crib and I could see that he was miserable, which made me sad too. But I'm glad it works because sometimes it is late at night and he is procrastinating going to bed or brushing his teeth, it's a useful tool that gets him moving. Two caveats though, it does not work with my wife. He will ignore her, but I think this is because she has not always followed through. Second, I have to restrain myself sometimes so I don't overuse it, but that can be harder than expected.
One last note, since there was a lot of "people get kids because they don't understand themselves or the greater good" or "people willingly ruin their lives so they can have kids" posts, I love having kids. It has changed me so much as a person. I don't read as much as I used to, and I play less online poker than before and we've gone down to about 4 TV shows that we watch now. But, I love spending time with my kids. I love talking to my son watching his mind work. I see my daughter starting to walk. And I wouldn't change my choices for anything. Sure, there are friends we have lost that I wish I still had. And travelling I wish I could do sometimes, like go for a hike in New Zealand which will have to wait. But I still have a good career, still read, still play online poker, watch sports on TV and I've never felt about any of these things like I do when I play baseball with my son, or play a Diego game on the computer with him or even stand next to my daughter on the carousel. But I understand that my argument is the un-cooler one, and it is more sexy to say ah, environmentally it is better not to pro-create and my friends have lost millions of brain cells because they had kids.
...in the MVP voting.
And since I use Gmail, on the side I have the suggestion "Add to calendar: Monday, November 17, Smoky"
All in all, I think I'm doing a good job, and I have no doubt that you are doing at least as well Jon.
Before x-10 came along my wife and I were constantly being asked for advise or asked what we were doing to get perfect kids. We tried to answer the best we could feeling confident we really were the reason our kids were perfect.
I think the reason x-10 came along was to humor us. We now laugh at ourselves for actually thinking we knew how to be great parents. Regardless of the gene pool kids come from there is a unique soul that seems to to be the big player in our lives, attitudes, and how we play out our earliest years.
And while x was very easy to raise, he is now 33, he has had his moments. Jon, your son jumping toward a ledge reminded me of this, thank you. When my two oldest boys were 8 and 4 they asked if they could throw rocks into the river while I opened our tent trailer at Jedidiah Smith State Redwoods Park near Creasant City.
After clearly laying out the rules I reluctantly agreed. Like I said earlier, these guys followed rules. How big do you think the lump in my throat was when I checked on them a few minutes later and I saw my youngest dog paddling and the oldest breath stroking across a deep and quiet part of the Smith River.
I didn't want to put a damper on what was to be a great vacation before it started so I kept my cool. Dodging a bullet seemed enough for the moment. But I still squirm at the memory.
Yes, having kids changes everything. Yes, it's hard. Yes, it can alter, weaken, or even destroy your relationship with your spouse if you don't make the extra effort to preserve that. And yes, it's worth all that. This is something I did not fully understand until I lost my 2 and a half year old son - he would have been 3 today. The pain is every bit as huge as you think it might be, but I wouldn't trade it in. I'm glad I had that son! I rejoice that he was ever a part of my life.
Every choice you make in your life changes everything that comes after. Whatever choices you've made will leave you, later in life, looking back and wondering what would have happened if you'd chosen otherwise. Every choice leaves the door open to regret - you can walk through that door or not in every case.
2. I regret not having my child sooner. I am 37 with a 11 month old. But by not having him sooner, I feel the time was best for me to give him my 1000 percent. I just wish i had him sooner because the bond is so tight already. I think now that at my dads age I had already moved from AYSO to Club. Made a baseball all star team that traveled. I felt so grown up then. My take about having to give up my former life (if u will) is GOOD! But then again I was ready far in advance to embrace that change. If you were to say to me 5 years ago that in 6 years it would have been one year since you last golfed or drank to excess I would have thought you were nuts..but deep down, even that stuff was growing tiresome.
3. I'm a stay at home dad. Primary guy, that's my job. Mom works because she has better job and better healthcare. Were able to afford one of us home. We wouldnt't want it any other way.
4. This job is harder than any job I have ever had. This will be my only break today until about 6:30. I have been up since 6:30 and fathers/mothers know, it's on. No reading an e-mail before making the dreary cold call. This is also the only job I ever loved. The only thing besides sports as a kid that I want to do all day long. When he is asleep I want him to wake up. Likewise when he is awake sometimes I want him to go to sleep!
5. I don't read book but love to hear advice and how others do things. Those books have agendas to me. How to make my, not our life easier. I treat my 11 month old as an equal. I might regret it but I don't care. I am always trying to think from his perspective.
From that prospective, I'd say don't sweat it; they are what they're gonna be. Don't beat them, encourage them to read and to think for themselves, otherwise stay out of their way. Probably they'll be just fine.
The "probably" makes it stressful, of course. But take solace from the knowledge that, in the long run, almost nothing you can do will make any difference.
And I always wanted to be a dad too, but I think it had to do with me not being so close with my dad.
Whew, did it get dusty in here all of a sudden?
--
Kinzer added that the A's level of interest is on par with that of the Giants, noting that he talked to Oakland officials last Thursday and Friday. "The A's have been [interested] all along, and it's been very strong on their part, too," Kinzer said, adding that Furcal, the top shortstop on the open market, might agree to a deal before the Winter Meetings in Las Vegas, Dec. 8-11.
"It could be fairly soon," Kinzer said. "We're hoping to narrow it down to three teams here pretty soon and see where [Furcal] wants to go from there." Kinzer, who called reports that his client is looking for at least four years at $10 million per season "in the ballpark," listed security and "where Rafael feels comfortable" as the top factors in negotiations.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=consterned
I don't understand the embarassment or concern regarding yelling. I think that at times yelling is a very valuable tool in raising a kid.
The important part is follow-up. Yelling without follow-up is just yelling. If you sit down and discuss with your kid after a period of time for the yelling and the corresponding punishment to have passed, and help them understand the reason behind the yelling, I think the child learns the reasoning and then the lesson.
Children need to learn there are things you just can't do. A 4-year-old is not going to have the capacity to understand why they shouldn't be doing something, and a loud no and punishment is the tool to get them not to do those things until they reach an age where they can understand.
As for the yelling that comes out of frustration because of seemingly being pulled from all angles and not having any "me" time if you will. That only means you are human. And again, if you can understand you are doing that and explain that to your children and also work at it, then you are doing your best.
All of us are different in how we handle different things. I wouldn't compare yourself to your dad and then think you are a failure. You are just different.
Also, remember you and your children are different too, so what may have seemed to work for your father with you won't necessarily work for you and your children, because your "different".
I don't know, $10m per sounds a lot more palatable than "more than $13m" which is what I had assumed previously.
--
Oh man that is my guiding principle. I hope it works. After that I may hit the books.
Perhaps this post title is appropriate. :)
On a side note, when I first saw the title of this post, I thought this was going to be some post about some Dodger free agents.
I think it has to have started at a very young age and been developed. I can't really say yet how things will turn out, but my son of 15 and I still have a very strong bond and love for each other, and I like to think the example I have set for him as he has grown up will stick with him as he begins to make those decisions you speak of.
But you are so correct, it is a tough task. And I am more worried now then I ever was when he was 4, and trust me, I was quite worried then too.
One thing I haven't seen mentioned is the theory/old spouse's tale that little children tend to be more compliant in odd-numbered years, and more rebellious and limit-testing in even-numbered years. Your son is 4. Was he any easier when he was 3? This was certainly the case for my son and stepson, and it tracks what experts say is the course of their personality development. Both my kids did frightening things at those ages, thinking my safety warnings were just the perfect time to perfect their James Dean/Marlon Brando impressions.
The impatience is something else again. While your kids will eventually stop risking their lives as frequently, they will never stop trying your patience. Those of you (younger?) commenters who don't have kids and don't want them but for one reason or another will become parents anyway (when you let yourself fall in love with a woman, they can be very persuasive on the baby issue) you will find reservoirs of patience that you never knew you had. And it still won't be enough.
Back in those prehistoric days of film stips and these types of films to promote learning:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x0mqlb5fBZo
Yes, I grew up on Vulcan until I was accepted in a Earth/Vulcan cultural exchange program, unfortunately I never was sent back because the program was cancelled due to poor ratings.
4 has definitely been my son's toughest year.
When I was about 13 and my next youngest brother was 12, my family went to Grand Canyon. We'd take our car to a view spot to take pictures and appreciate the majesty. There was usually a rail to fence you in so you couldn't come too close to the edge, but my brother and I wanted to explore the edge -- it's a canyon for gosh sakes, it's made for looking down -- so we would go over the fence to do that. My mother would shriek at us, we were scaring her to death! So what did we do after that? We made sure to go even farther at the next stop. We'd dangle one leg over the chasm, or stand with our toes hanging over it. If we could do it safely, we'd even pretend to fall into the canyon. It was so much fun to freak her out. Finally, it got to the point where every time we came to a new view spot, she would just stay in the car. Combined with my father's terrible driving -- speeding on windy roads, passing other cars on curves, and driving right up to the edge of steep drops -- our antics ruined my mother's vacation. What a couple of bastards we were! So, Jon, you might want to inventory your childhood. Perhaps your kids are merely punishing you for similar sins.
Regarding Furcal, wasn't there a reason he only got a three year deal with the Dodgers? Was he coming off an injury with the Braves?
Here's a chart of average temperatures throughout the year in Los Angeles: http://www.laalmanac.com/weather/we88.htm
According to the chart, it should be about 72 degrees today, maybe less. Instead its 90 degrees. What gives? I might consider moving out east where there are blizzards and freeze watches as we speak. I'm not mentally prepared to deal with summer in November.
The way it worked out was probably the worst-case scenario for both Furcal and the Dodgers. I read up the thread he's considering 4 year offers at $10 million a year. Imagine what he could command if he'd had three seasons like his first one -- maybe twice that.
This is true. Ever since my wife & me got married, we spend less & less time with our friends. No children yet, but its definitely the marriage part that tends to kill friendships I think moreso than children. The dynamic of a married couple going out with the single friends just doesnt work.
I was hoping he'd take a 3 yr deal with LA but understand why if he can get more he'll take it. Still, I'd rather have an infield of DeWitt, Furcal, Hu/DeJesus and Loney next year than Dewitt, ?, ? and Loney. And if it comes down to it would rather take a chance with Furcal than with Hudson for similar money.
Would they even consider bringing Young back after the way the Titans played without him?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8316
An injury would have to happen.
What he asks for says alot about what he thinks about his health.
White: 1,824 rushing yards
Bush: 1,440
But this is more of a long-term play.
The Reds pick up a compensatory sandwich pick due to Affeldt's Type B status.
Every once in a while, mix in something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGseSpjOO10
He'll be running 5.0 40's by than
How will he be able to increase his speed by then? :)
Petros Papadakis has said many times that Drew would be a better pro than Reggie but since Petros also is biased against Reggie (and Matt Leinart), its hard to say that was an objective position to take.
http://tinyurl.com/6ojxh9
Clay Zevada: 35.1 IP, 54 K, 11 base runners allowed. The guy is 24 in A ball, but still, pretty amazing.
http://tiny.cc/E30N3
http://tinyurl.com/65bo5o
You think we might be scouting her? ;)
http://tinyurl.com/5asozm
I don't believe a word of it, but it says Ryan Howard was "about to be shipped to L.A" for Loney & Kershaw last July.
On numerous occasions Petros has voiced his dislike for Leinart and Bush, mostly that they are/were prima donnas, jerks, etc.
True. I am not a Petros fan, because of his style (not because he doesn't like Leinart, etc). :)
On the whether to have children argument -- if you have commitment and a rational hope of doing a good job at parenting, it stands a chance of being a long term net gain for the world. One doesn't have to be perfect to get this outcome. Less is not always more in this equation.
On the concern about yelling -- many fine words on that by the commenters. The one thing I would add is, if you weren't examining it, it would be a problem; just the existence of it is not per se a bad thing.
I did not know:
1) he played minor-league ball for the Dodgers
2) he was the GM for the Lakers when they got Kareem.
(courtesy of the Seattle Times' Larry Stone)
Icon SMI
Third prize -- On his teammates' view of his, well, unique fashion sense:
"All my teammates don't think what I'm wearing is good fashion. A lot of times, they can't believe what I'm wearing. But if you ask me, what they're wearing is a crime."
Second prize -- On the one-of-a-kind personality of his recently retired ex-teammate, Bret Boone:
"When I met him, he was kind of a human being that you would never meet in Japan. So whenever I was around him, I almost felt like I was witnessing a creature, not a human being."
First prize -- On what it was like to listen to the boos in Seattle as the Mariners began to self-destruct in May:
"Playing on this team and seeing what is happening around me, I feel that something is beginning to fall apart. But, if I was not in this situation, and I was objectively watching what just happened this week, I would probably be drinking a lot of beers and booing. Usually, I enjoy Japanese beer, but given the situation, if I was objectively watching the game, I wouldn't care if it was Japanese beer, American beer or beer from Papua New Guinea."
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/columns/story?columnist=stark_jayson&id=3611226
I just saw it on ESPNews. I will look for a link.
Someone posted the interview where he said it:
http://www.clublakers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=103909
Maybe he's under the presumption that Phil will retire after this year (hopefully with championship #10 -- sorry fanerman!).
But even so, don't see a place for him on a team with young Bynum plus Gaisol. Fuhgedaboutit, Shaq.
It'd certainly be nice to see Kobe and Shaq make amends on the court.
I just need to qualify it since my 9-0 prediction went up in smoke the first game after I made it.
Also, some might say I got my USC-Stanford prediction wrong (45-3), but if you sound it out, I got it right: "Forty-five, two three". :)
259
Stanford is going the Big Ten route, ending its season so early.
I am digging the lack of "The" in the name. I had no idea that was the case. It's a nice counterbalance to the Buckeyes.
There are no Big Ten games scheduled beyond this Saturday.
After sitting through all of the scintillating (not really) 27-7 win last Saturday I would say that even UCLA's wins are only slightly more entertaining then a BYE.
One good moment of that night. UW Husky marching band finishes their Monty Python themed half time show with "Always look on the bright side of life" Husky fans need to hum that each saturday.
Michigan at Ohio St, 9am
Michigan St at Penn St, 12:30pm
Penn State
Win and they're in
Ohio State
1) Beat Michigan
2) Michigan St beats Penn St
Michigan State
1) Michigan beats Ohio St
2) Beat Penn St
Ha! Perhaps I should have had more of a pregnant pause before hitting submit.
I've always wondered: is it berth? or birth? In the case of Michigan beating Ohio St, my father (a devout Wolverine fan) may actually give birth.
What a lack of respect.
You would think so. ESPN's own Bob Knight said he thought he was the best coach there was and completely underrated.
Actually Michigan State would have won a 3-way tie with Penn State and Ohio State because they played 12 FBS opponents while the other two schools had one FCS opponent on the schedule.
Penn State has been to two Rose Bowls, losing to USC, 14-3, in 1923, and beating Oregon in 1995. Penn State finished the 1994 season, only its second in the Beg Ten, undefeated but didn't win a national championship since it finished behind Nebraska in both polls.
Ohio State has made 13 Rose Bowls (winning 6), most recently in 1997 (defeating the "Jake the Snake"-led ASU squad). 7 of their 13 Rose Bowls have been against USC (including 5 from 1969-1980). Interestingly, Jim Tressel has played in 3 BCS title games in 7+ years at Ohio St but has never made it to the Rose Bowl.
We know better than anyone else why or why not we should have kids. So, again, why is it someone else's concern? It seems that people view it particularly odd that a woman would not have children. Some people think childless couples are selfish. How does that follow at all?
Most of the bias seems to come from other women and certainly mostly from married people.
The first time I met a particular neighbor, she immediately asked if we planned to have kids. Literally, it was the second thing she asked after telling me her name. I was stunned, but as usual when I am caught off guard, I felt compelled to avoid turning it back on the other person. (Perhaps I'm too tactful.) I said we probably wouldn't have kids, and she looked at me as if I suddenly had three heads.
Having children is arguably the greatest responsibility one can undertake. Having children because "you're suppposed to" is not a reason. Nor is it valid to argue, "You don't know what you're missing!" Well, yes, I think we do. It's no one's business.
People who directly ask us about our potential procreation possibly don't know how rude they are. I would not dream of approaching others and asking them, "So, do you plan to lose weight?" No one should approach another and tell him or her that they "need to" have a baby. That is absurd to me, yet people do it frequently. I am no less of a person or a woman because I don't have children.
Thanks for providing a chance to express my opinion. It's unexpected that I would find a forum for this topic on Dodgerthoughts! I really haven't been able to talk with many other people about this. I feel rather isolated by it, although we have many friends who have kids, and we love to visit them. It's just not something that gets discussed--anywhere, ever.
Thanks to all the commenters as well for your insightful thoughts.
280
Penn State has been to two Rose Bowls, losing to USC, 14-3, in 1923...
That was their first year under JoePa, right? :)
I totally agree.
My extended family thinks I am insane, because I say I do not know if I want to get married or have kids.
A Penn St - Oregon St or a USC - Ohio St Rose Bowl would feature a rematch of a regular season game.
I wonder how many regular season rematches there have been in Rose Bowl history. So far, I have found two:
1957 (1956 season): Iowa over Oregon St (twice)
1988: Michigan St over USC (twice)
If it's any consolation, I think you're insane, but for other reasons. :)
My multiple personalities appreciate it.
UCLA also beat Michigan in the 1982 season and 1983 Rose Bowl (following a Michigan win in the 12/31/81 Bluebonnet Bowl).
Penn State showed up late for the game and the USC and Penn State coaches almost got into a fight before the game.
https://griddle.baseballtoaster.com/archives/310143.html
282 I agree with the sentiment, I do think that the "kid" topic is touchy one to talk about. I don't think either side holds any moral superiority against the other.
UCLA lost to Ohio State in the 1975 regular season, but beat Ohio State in the 1976 Rose Bowl.
Last week, Damaso Marte re-signed for 3/$12m with the Yankees.
Both men strikeout more hitters than Joe Beimel, but it appears the market is shaping up nicely for Troy from West Virginia's favorite player.
UCLA is absolutely cursed when it comes to guards for the 09 class.
And I am going to blame it on Barack Obama.
Now he has to fix the country to make it up to me.
There is still a St. Agnes parish, but it hasn't had a high school attached to it for a long time.
>> You could say it was our momentum from ending the season that helped us, but I've got to give some of the credit to T.J. Simers for reminding us everyday a month prior to the playoffs that "this organization had only won one playoff game in the last 20 years" (no pressure). <<
Also, for those planning trips to Spring Training, Andre will be reviewing Phoenix area restaurants:
## I will be starting soon a Spring Training review here in my hometown of Phoenix -- some of my fave spots in the desert to grab a good bite. ##
http://tinyurl.com/6ldmzr
"Feinstein calls for ant-scalping measure"
It requires the use of very small knives.
http://www.latimes.com/news/obituaries/la-me-newell18-2008nov18,0,2680335,full.story
http://tinyurl.com/5sslg9
If those are the matchups, I would predict Duke and USC wins. I think UCLA will be better than Duke by the end of the year, but right now I would give them the edge.
I have not seen USC play, but I assume they are being smart and feeding Taj Gibson a lot, unlike last year.
MLB.com drops MS Silverlight for Adobe's FLASH.
I gotta say, I completely respect your decision not to have children. After having our first child, I can understand why some would choose not to, and this doesn't even bring up the difficulties or past experiences that might play into the decision. I immediately felt guilty for the way I viewed our childless neighbors as a teenager. I guess for me it was a stigma brought on by ignorance, and now I would never assume someone should have a child just because I do, so please know there are parents out there that respect and try to understand your position.
Some people think childless couples are selfish
I think you'll find this interesting, and encouraging.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Childfree
Because they are close friends, we've discussed with them why they don't want kids and why Bride of Kavula and I want (and now have) a kid. I think we all think both couples are making the right choices. Spawn of Kavula is one of the two best things that's ever happened to me (and when circumstances briefly appeared to be that she wouldn't be in the cards for us, it was devastating). That our friends choose not to have a kid isn't selfish or whatever -- it's just the only thing that's right for them.
There's a way of looking at this that's a bit depressing: whether you have kids or you don't, you're making a huge sacrifice. For both the Kavulas and our friends, it was immediately clear which sacrifice we'd prefer, and we're both immensely satisfied with our decisions.
Its amusing to read the crap Heyman makes up when it involves other teams. Who in the hell is going to take a stinker like the Barry Zito contract?
http://www.fannation.com/si_blogs/hot_stove
As for the Dodgers - Manny it is a wait and see but I can't see shelling out for more than 3 premium years at maximum. After that, he will be a overpriced liability no longer able to play the OF! Furcal - I like him very much-however have concerns over his tender back though has me queasy over any long term deal.
Will need to get one starter if we don't land Manny! Otherwise, rest of team can stay where we are!
Otherwise, at least I believe I have hope for the Dodgers future and our country since "Caribou Barbie" is now back in Alaska! Sorry Jon! I had to let that one slip in! I hated her!
Welcome back!
--
So if my fantasy team can't get at least two points from Marshawn Lynch and Lee Evans combined tonight, they both go on my obelisk. Or at least my miniature Stonehenge statue.
Somebody taking a page out of the Dodgers playbook?
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Bills offensive coordinator is also a moron. 3rd and 1 and he calls a shotgun play with a QB that has already thrown 2 picks in the quarter.
Back to baseball, congrats to MLB for getting rid of SliverLite.
Get your own obelisk!
323 I've decided against an obelisk and instead I'm just using a small tree in which I carve the names of people on my List. It's just the size of a bonsai right now but I hope to someday grow it to at least Douglas Fir. Anyway, rest easy.
Back to work.
I've thought of a smart remark answer several times, but just decided to let it go.
Five is not even a lot, just ask Daniel.
Recurrence
Because you've talked
about her, you waken
to her breathing in the bedroom
built before she left.
She's there, asleep,
her breathing as deep and regular
as the rush and catch of ocean
air around the house,
as insistent as your dream
of her heavy hair damp
on your neck as you rocked her
to sleep on the porch.
I would've been willing to deal anyone except Bills or Kershaw, but that's just me.
You know, even if the Padres did lose him via rule 5 draft, I don't think the Padres would really mind it. Talk about a bad draft choice.
http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2008/nov/17/padres-kouz-surgery/?padres
Chicago Tribune owns them and they own LA Times.
I tend to agree on that. This is a unique free agent class of pitchers that will allow teams with deep pockets (Yanks, Dodgers, Angels, Sox) to buy what they need. There are precious few teams that want to give up lots of prospects even for a guy like Peavy. Ultimately, I think that the Braves will get into it again, but I think that San Diego probably already blew off the best offer they were going to get.
This is a great daddy.
Keep up the good work.
Her dating Turtle in real life gives hope to us all.
Turtle is a character's name on Entourage.
http://cbs5.com/local/sf.house.explosion.2.867261.html
I was thinking it was like straight out of "Breaking Bad" but it sounds like it may have been a gas heater explosion. Pretty scary. I thought there was a 1 second earthquake when it happened, but then went about my business. But then when a news chopper started circling overhead a little while ago, I finally checked the news.
Anyway... uh.. .as you were, carry on, etc.
A 2-year old with glass in his face?*
(*I'm trying to keep up the question thing)
That show, more than ever, is all Neil Patrick Harris.
The college hoops season doesn't start until we say it starts.
It already started so there, ESPN. You are not bigger than the sports you carry.
I have not read the thread (I will) but the post makes me think you are standing in my backyard looking into my house tonight. My 14 year old daughter has a substantial English test tomorrow. She has known about the test since last Tues. She only "mentioned" it to her mother yesterday. It is 11:00 pm and she is woefully ill-prepared. I am fairly confident she will fail. So I am left with the following options: I can yell and scream. I can be sarcastic and biting. I can stay up all night and help her cram or I can do the hardest thing of all: nothing. I have to go with the last option. Indeed, a large part of me actually hopes she fails. This appears to be the only way she will learn the lesson she should know by now. Maybe if I had let it happen sooner we wouldn't be facing this problem now (although I doubt it). Sorry to tell you Jon, it doesn't get any easier as they get older and while you don't want them to jump over the glass partition at Staples, you (I am projecting here) have to let them fail if they are to learn how to deal with it and move forward. (I wish I was truly as rational about it as I sound here. It takes all my control to keep my mouth shut.)
But the woman looks like a college student. She certainly doesn't like someone who has a job.
Life is a party when you to college online.
Maybe your daughter is a better procrastinator and BSer than you think.
No, you just have to know what a triangle is.
Guessing the number of triangles gets you into the honors program.
Huh.
Wood hit .167 for Estrellas in the Dominican winter league, with one home run and 16 strikeouts in 48 at-bats. The club sent him home after 13 games.
Ouch. Unrelated, but is the AFL season over?
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-spw-angels18-2008nov18,0,6141888.story
Hee, I can't wait for him to replace Clint Hurdle during the middle of the season.
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/nov/17/sources-rockies-add-jim-tracy-to-staff/
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/blog/index?entryID=3709231&name=gammons_peter
Interesting. James Loney was 2nd in the MLB in "most runners in scoring position" when he came to the plate.
Shocking that Gammons is promoting someone involved with the Red Sox.
Also from that article:
Brad Penny is so serious about his conditioning that, while he is off hunting in the Midwest, he has taken the trainer he hired from Athletes' Performance Institute with him
I wonder if Penny or the trainer have seen "Surviving the Game."
1. Justin Morneau - 3
2. James Loney - 44
3. David Wright - 5
4. Carlos Beltran - 13
5. Ryan Howard - 1
I think we can officially declare Loney's 90 RBI total "Very unimpressive".
Actually, Loney and Wright were tied for 2nd.
"Very unimpressive"
Isn't that the slogan for TBS?
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
If you're trying to make the argument that James Loney is better at baseball than me, I'll totally agree.
Personally, I thought the Dodgers were still in the Iron Age.
It looks like Dempster's contract will be 4/$50 or 4/$52, depending on either Fox Sports or the Chicago Sun-Times.
Somewhere Derek Lowe is rubbing his hands together while saying, "Excellent."
I will not have the good name of one Carolyn Hughes sullied in such a manner! Good day, sir.
Pedroia wins a close one. More neau than yes for the Twins 1B.
I'd place the O/U for first place vote earners at 6.5 and take the over slightly.
Right now I have possible First placers:
Mauer
Morneau
Youk (The U-Crew!)
Pedroia
-- (actually deserves line)
Longoria
K-Rod
You could always go in early....
1) A-Rod - 62.4
2) Sizemore - 60.7
3) Pedroia - 59.8
4) Mauer - 57.1
5) Bradley - 56.2
6) Hamilton - 55.9
7) Huff - 55.6
8) Kinsler - 53.7
9) Youkilis - 53.4
10) Quentin - 51.3
My only case is that I really enjoy Loney and like watching young players evolve. When they do well at age 24 but not as well as players that have reached their primes, or not as well as a very select few future HOF players when they were 24, I find no reason to look for and embrace negatives.
On draft day Bill Wlash wanted to be aware of the 5 best plays a college kid has made to better understand his potential and used that information as part of his draft selection process.
As Dodger fans, I think we will enjoy the team more if we keep in mind players' best plays especially if their character is strong and keep the yea but thoughts on the back burner.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.