Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
An upbeat prognosis for James Loney's power was posted by Derek Carty at The Hardball Times.
(Thanks to Dodger Thoughts reader Preston Bannard - not this guy - for the link.)
We should all pass out C's to the the bestest person ever.
Ray Durham will be our team captain next year by veteraness.
http://www.projectprospect.com/article/2008/11/24/top-10-first-basemen-under-25
Why these teams? All are at or near the top of their respective leagues in ticket-price increases over the past three years. Combine that with each city's 2009 economic prognosis for unemployment and income, and it's tough to see current ticket prices being sustained much longer. The Dodgers, for example, have jacked up the average cost of a game 44 percent since 2005, to $229 for a family of four, according to Team Marketing Report's Fan Cost Index. Meanwhile, Moody's Economy.com projects unemployment in the L.A. metro area will increase by two percentage points by the end of next year, to about 10 percent.
http://sports.yahoo.com/top/news?slug=ys-forbesticketslash112008&prov=yhoo&type=lgns
Good candidates for what...?
Angels Tickets are ridiculously low for the kind of payroll they have. I believe they rank 19th in MLB for average ticket prices. I've even been surprised how cheaply I can get to an Angels game, were it not for the commute :)
The question - and I'm not denying it's legit - is whether the Dodgers will continue to sell the number of seats they have available at each price level. I could see the Dodgers offering more specials next year, but I wouldn't expect they'd have to roll back prices on a widespread level.
I wonder who led MLB in payroll in 1982?
When he purchased the Dodgers he did it by mortgaging his parking assets along with loans from other parties. Considering the current financial climate, things may not be so rosy for Frank's finances. The Dodgers may be living from paycheck to paycheck with an eminent layoff gaining in the rear view mirror.
Recent free-agent signing dates:
Andruw Jones: December 12
Jeff Kent: December 15
Jason Schmidt: December 6
Nomar Garciaparra: December 19 (2005), November 20 (2006)
Rafael Furcal: December 19
Juan Pierre: November 22
Derek Lowe: January 11
Hiroki Kuroda: December 16
Most of the signings took place after the winter meetings and after the last day to tender contracts.
Now, this doesn't mean that the Dodgers won't spend any money but unless you are going to indict every MLB team, I don't think you can single out the Dodgers for not acting right now.
Players have all the leverage until the first few contracts fall.
Juan Pierre: November 22
Jason Schmidt: December 6
Andruw Jones: December 12
Jeff Kent: December 15
Hiroki Kuroda: December 16
Nomar Garciaparra: December 19
Rafael Furcal: December 19
Derek Lowe: January 11
It's clearly best to wait until Dec 16th!
I also think McCourt needs to hoard some cash and be careful, but that doesn't mean there won't be at least 1 big FA signing. There really haven't been any big singings yet by any team...
15 Per USA Today - 1998
Baltimore had a payroll of $70.4M, the Yankees were second with a $63.1M payroll
http://content.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/salaries/totalpayroll.aspx?year=1998
And this link will give the payrolls from 1988-2008.
http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/
Thanks. The Yankees were all the way down at 8th in payroll in 1991.
12/7/2005 Dodgers sign Furcal to three-year contract
The Los Angeles Dodgers announced today that the club has signed All-Star shortstop Rafael Furcal to a three-year contract through 2008, according to Dodger General Manager Ned Colletti.
http://tinyurl.com/5t89sc
BTW, Mike Felder made $75,000 playing for the Brewers in 1987.
Not that I'm saying C.C. is mediocre. Burnett, I have no idea how good he is as a player.
I wish I was following baseball closely then. The World Series looked awesome.
And why was Kal Daniels pulling in over 2 million?
Kal Daniels was awesome...
Wait for it...
http://tinyurl.com/5hcxbe
I tend to leave those caps for the Turtles of the world to wear. I choose not to crucify MLB for this, however, in the spirit of Thanksgiving.
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/1990/B09280SFN1990.htm
That 1990 team could really mash. Murray also hit a HR that night.
Everyone is going to want the pink strawberry hats.
This is interesting to me.
*At present it is very difficult for companies to secure financing.
*So those companies that have relied on short term loans as a method to maintain their cash flow are all now experiencing signifigant problems.
*Companies that do not need loans in order to maintain their cash flow merely need to sell enough goods/services to cover their fixed and operating costs to weather this storm.
So the point that is interesting to me is which MLB franchises fit each model?
We Know that McCourt needs to service his debt obligations and that his collateral (real estate holdings) for the loans that he has already taken on may be experienceing a decrease in value.
The Yankees and the Red Sox have their TV Networks that produce cash for them.
Where do the remainder of the teams fit into this model and how may this influence a team's spending behavior?
Seems like we might be able to predict some behavior with this info.
In looking back maybe I should never give my opinion. I was giddy over Eric Davis and Kal Daniels as Dodgers. Evidently jealous over everything from the Big Red machine. Now that was a rivalry, this Giant stuff is tiny compared to the Dodger/Reds of 69-whenever they moved to the Central. Battles baby, battles.
Kal Daniels last played in the majors in 1992.
He was 28.
Final payment for season ticket renewals are due in early January but they will only be getting about 25% because most people already paid for them with the credit from the postseason package. So he better not have blown the cash infusion from Sept when everyone bought the post season package and basically paid for their 2009 tickets, cause he doesn't have much cash coming in for 2009 that they don't already have until they start selling single game tickets.
I liked Kal Daniels a lot. When we got Eric Davis, I was ecstatic. We headed into 1992 loaded, with the Triple Threat OF of Davis/Butler/Strawberry, and Kal Daniels moved to 1B. I was ready to push the 1-hit wonder Braves aside for the real NL West power.
Man that was such a letdown.
You are not mistaken. He was an excellent hitter. Too many injuries killed his career.
7 seasons: .285/.382/.479 138 OPS+
She does go to Notre Dame though.
Injuries, before then you remember correctly. He was the complete package, power, average, plate discipline, and speed. Had 3 seasons with an OPS+ over 140 by the age of 24. To bad he had the knees of a 50 year old by the age of 25.
(Heads explodes with rage)
(Checks to see if he can convert to Judaism online.)
Yup, 1992 may have been one of the biggest letdowns ever. All about timing, a year later we had Piazza but all those guys were done who we thought were in their prime.
When did Notre Dame allow girls? Or was I mistaken in thinking it was a balls only school at one point?
Awesome, TC, just awesome.
Haven't you seen Rudy? :)
He used to scare me to death. The Reds were a strange team in that I hated the team but greatly admired the players that we did battle with. Except Rose, I hated Rose after Fosse.
Co-educational institution
Notre Dame continued to grow over the years adding more colleges, programs, and even sports teams. By 1921, with the addition of the College of Commerce, Notre Dame had grown from a small college to a university with five colleges and a professional law school.
The university continued to expand and add new residence halls and buildings with each subsequent president until 1972. At that time, then-president Father Theodore Hesburgh made the decision to admit women into the university.
Two of the male residence halls were converted for the newly admitted female students that first year, while two others were converted for the next school year.
The first female student, a transfer from St. Mary's College, graduated in 1972 with a bachelor's degree in marketing.
Someone should look into this. I don't buy it. ;)
No, I couldn't have cared less about some talentless yodel working harder then everyone else so he could play on a college football team as though that was some big deal. Good for him but it ain't movie material. It is not like he was Arnold trying to save the world from the Predator or something.
So I have a vague recollection of watching a ND game with someone years ago and they only had boy cheerleaders and I was told it was because no girls were allowed. That is my memory.
I bet you Supercuts would not be happy.
I'll give you 10,000-to-1 odds that never happens.
Ha
Maybe she's on pain-killers...
I hate Notre Dame with the fire of a thousand suns, but Rudy is a good movie.
Your joke was way better than mine!
Kinda interesting that Pete Rose's only had one year in 1969 with a post .500 slugging. I wonder how a player like Rose would be treated today. My guess is that he would be given a shorter leash and a shorter career, due to his lack of speed, power and only playing hte corner spots.
My highlight oh his speech was when he asked if people knew who Sean Astin was and first people yelled, "Goonies!!" Followed by one student yelling, "Encino Man!!!"
I have no hatred of ND.
Movies loosely based on reality usually bug me but along that vein I surprisingly liked the "Bank Job". The idea that a guy who was hung would still have his file locked until 2050 really makes you wonder what it was he knew.
McKenzie?
(SFW: Doppler Radar)
http://tinyurl.com/2rfg6t
vr, Xei
I read the list earlier today. It was interesting, little surprised at how high he has Kyle Russel.
A friend of mine lives in Santa Monica next door to one of the lesser Baldwins, possibly Stephen. Can't remember.
Julio Franco is the only player since integration to have an OPS+ higher then Rose at that age.
Julio Franco 107 265 2005 46
Julio Franco 111 361 2004 45
Pete Rose 99 500 1985 44
Julio Franco 113 223 2003 44
Carl Yastrzemsi 106 437 1983 43
Pete Rose 99 421 1984 43
Tony Perez 138 207 1985 43
Carlton Fisk 97 501 1991 43
Julio Franco 94 383 2002 43
Rickey Hendersn 92 222 2002 43
Luke Appling 124 619 1949 42
Stan Musial 101 379 1963 42
Hank Aaron 102 308 1976 42
Carl Yastrzemsi 110 523 1982 42
Carlton Fisk 134 521 1990 42
Dave Winfield 91 328 1994 42
Rickey Hendersn 95 465 2001 42
Andres Galarraa 118 293 2003 42
vr, Xei
Would have loved Rose had he been a Dodger.
As Rose was rounding third you could see it was coming.
Wonder what the outcome would have been had he run into Scioscia instead? Scioscia absorbed some heavy hits.
Wonder if Rose would have played it the same with Scoioscia receiving the ball?
Another Catcher has his shoulder shattered the same way during this time. Was it Jerry Grote of the Mets? Didn't he come and back up for the Dodgers before hang'in 'em up?
http://www.truebluela.com/2008/11/20/666730/prospect-number-twelve-40
BB-Ref
It is a pain because they don't allow you to select using age, but you can sort using age. So you have to create an descending sort by age of just about every player who ever played the game whose only criteria is that they posted an OPS+ > 90.
vr, Xei
Age is one of the selectable criteria on the left side of the batting season finder page.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.