Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Tony Jackson of the Daily News passes along the news regardin Takashi Saito, Scott Proctor, Yhency Brazoban, Angel Berroa and Mario Alvarez. The Dodgers can still resign any of them, but so can any other team.
We could have offered him arbitration, but we did not. So now he is out of our control.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/sports_blog/
Dear Kevin Towers, why the heck are you still negotiating in the media?
This time he must be thinking that if we include our best hitter teams will give up more.
Wow.
http://www.boston.com/sports/baseball/redsox/extras/extra_bases/2008/12/report_sox_make_1.html
Not a very credible rumor, probably a prank.
I've always hated the way Yankee fans get whatever they want. Carl Pavano's ineffectiveness made me happy. No rings for A-Rod? Happy.
No other team makes me feel this way, not even SF.
Its when pitchers like Zito sign huge contracts when it seems that everyone knows that his best years were behind him that throws the game out of whack. Its Zito's contract that helped push starting pitching to the crazy heights today, without Zito's contract, I doubt Johan Santana, and C.C. Sababitha barely break $100,000,000
I got over Yankee hatred. It made life much easier.
Notre Dame hatred is another matter. University of Arizona hatred is a new one for me.
http://www.bronxbanterblog.com/2008/12/12/aj-stands-for-awful-judgment/
If my online translation tools and six years of Spanish classes are used properly here, Ramirez brushes off a report that he was considering retirement and says his goal is to hit 700 career home runs. He also claims to be unaware of contract negotiatons, which of course is the only logical reason why the Dodgers didn't hear back for a month regarding their two contract offers to him. Ramirez also says he thinks he showed he can play.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
Diamond Lueng also has a post about Martin and Ethier's super-two status.
Bronx Banter just ain't the same without all the swearing.
How sad.
"We're expecting quite a few teams to be calling in regards to Takashi Saito," agent Nez Balelo said. "We respect the Dodgers' stance and we're moving on and looking forward to free agency."
Couple other interesting lines in that article:
Without Saito, Jonathan Broxton becomes the de facto closer, although management has conceded his inconsistency is likely to lead to the acquisition of a veteran for late-inning insurance.
Proctor's name notable by its absence:
Brazoban and Alvarez are likely to sign Minor League contracts with the Dodgers. Negotiations with Saito and Berroa could resume.
Not even ToyCannon or JoeyP wanted him back.
Maybe D4P just to stay consistent.
lets pick up wiggington!
"It's a terrible deal, a blot on Cashman's career."
vs.
"It's a terrible deal, a blot on Cashman's career. But no biggie. Let's get Teixeira."
No such thing as scarity in Yankeeland.
Also, Diedrich Bader as Batman does not sound like Batman. Its just Dierich Bader as Dierich Bader.
In fact, my head hurts.
Time to watch "Europa" something else I don't quite get and makes my head hurt, but at least is more interesting than the baseball winter meetings.
How about actual games like Winter League stuff? Seems like a fair compromise, ESPN Deportes airs games from the DR, I believe.
Be sure to use the remote if you want to change the channel.
The AL East is still a very tough division.
If you're JP Riccardi, wouldn't it make sense to try and trade Roy Halladay?
I don't see the Jays doing anything in that division anytime soon.
Angels made a 8 year deal to Texiera.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Barry-Sanders-Jr-is-a-chip-off-the-old-block?urn=nfl,128540
Kind of pointless to have him now unless we are not signing an outfielder or getting rid of Slappy McDribbler and the Hamburglar.
That's a great observation!
Now, if they have this same roster on February 15th, then I think you can argue that obviously there a budget concerns but right now, its a little early.
Parking Lot Frank figured out that you can only make so much money from raising parking prices, so gotta make money with the Dodgers somehow. Go cheap with the payroll for on the field and pocket the difference. Need to pay for all those community ball fields somehow.
So where are you going to get a bat for the Dodgers? Raffie a question mark, Kent gone, Garciapara gone, Jones a large question mark, not a whole heck of a lot of firepower in the Dodgers lineup, and that's been the story for 1 1/2 seasons for the Dodgers.
So no Manny, were is the offense coming from, well where's the defense and pitching coming from for that matter? Are you counting on Schmitt coming back, Juan is going to change to being a power hitter, Andruw is going to find is stroke in Winter baseball ? Yikes!
http://tinyurl.com/6rsre9
Oh no! I have no heroes left.
greed and honor work a couple directions, eh. on the one hand, furcal probably owes the dodgers a do-over. he was good to great when he played, but he was healthy for roughly 1.5 years of the 3-year $39 million contract. though i understand it's easy for me to turn down millions of imaginary money, i'd think being rich makes it possible to pay for things like self respect. in other words, he should sign with the dodgers for a decent amount and provide the services for which he's already been paid. on the flip side, saito was one of the three best closers in baseball while being paid about 10 percent of his market value. the dodgers owners, if they had honor - and they don't - would pay the man a few million to find out if he's elbow is gonna come back. if you think this is horrible business, by the way, ponder how jerry buss would handle this... and then look at the rafters at staples...
We need you Manny wan Kenobi..you're our only hope.
Manny not only put butts in seats, he kept them in the seats past the 7th inning and into the playoffs. How much is that worth to Parking Lot Frank?
http://www.rotoauthority.com/2008/12/a-look-at-the-s.html
The upshot: It'll be improved, and Wilson, Affeldt and Howry all give up their share of HRs so there will also be some painful losses.
Hopefully I'm only there for the painful losses.
Great point regarding Raffy. The fact that he is even considering a 4 yr deal from the Royals (a complete non-contender), makes no sense to me. Take the 2 years with the Dodgers, hope to round back in to form, and then hit paydirt as an elite SS, not a league-wide question mark. I hope the extra 2 years for a small market team is worth it to him..
Panic....why would Dodgers fans do that...well the mustache might just do more silly things.
Like maybe offer Schmitty a contract extension @ say 100 Million for 5 years, just because the Dodgers want to be like the "big boys" and the mustache thinks he's going to be great...one day.
If there's concern about his back, and age this time, its only going to be that much more next time.
And its not as if Furcal can't push a trade later on from the Royals to a contender, heck, I'm sure that's partly why the Royals are signing him, for the net of prospects at the end of their relationship with Furcal. If Furcal signs with the Royals for 4 years, he's not going to play in Kansas City for all 4 years.
There's always stuff buzzing on State Street at night but when I go back rarely end up doing anything too hot or hip at night.
Maybe mintx can help.
Thanks..I lived up there for 5 yrs and did everything between Q's to Wildcat (pre burn-down) back in the day. I've heard the Sportsman is getting to be a good pub for pint and some futbol..trying to avoid the college crowd (if possible):)
And as far as Furcal's self-respect goes, it's clear he made every effort to play as much as he possibly could.
vr, Xei
If the Angels sign Tex, then it should come down to the Yankees and Dodgers, right? I really just don't see the Yanks shelling out that kind of money after signing CC, AJ, and, probably, Pettite. I mean, geez.
Manny to the Yanks would be a dagger in manny hearts.
Cardiologists call this condition "Manny being Manny cardiomyopathy"
The Yankees can only sign one more type-A or Type-B FA, they might as well go for broke.
http://tinyurl.com/5792m2
I don't think that's how it works.
Tex to Angels
Manny to Dodgers. Yankees don't really want him.
I have to wonder if cold market for Manny has anything to do with the way he quit on Boston to force a trade. If I were an owner it would make me think twice.
It's easier to buy in bulk.
I think Tex ends up in Boston, which for Boras that could be good than Manny's market expands to the Yanks, Angels and Dodgers.
As for Lowe, Ned has already put the kibosh on it.
Btw, what do people know about Japanese pitcher Kenshin Kawakami? He's been linked to the Braves and Red Sox, but the Dodgers were also mentioned as being interested. Doesn't seem worth getting excited about...
I would like to see the Dodgers to show caution with their spending in these troubled economic times. And, they need pitching depth more than they need Manny.
There are two Mannys. Which Manny will the Dodgers get if they wind paying him less than he thought he would get and less than he thinks he deserves. Anybody that can't jump up and down with appreciation at making $15,000,000 a year and show that appreciation on the field with hustle and joy will eventually be a problem.
I will be really disappointed if Ned so much as looks at Trevor Hoffman. He's no longer reliable and Hells Bells has no place in DS.
rinse
Repeat Baseball is a business
If Manny don't get that, then the Dodgers better not sign him or anyone with an ego.
Dodgers' Andruw Jones is hitting .500
>> Andruw Jones made his Dominican Winter League debut last night for Aguilas, going 1 for 2 with a walk and a strikeout while playing center field. He hit fifth in the lineup. (Newly signed Hector Luna hit second).
Jones is expected to play there until Christmas-time when he'll return home for a break. He's expected to play about five weeks there. <<
http://tinyurl.com/6b58wh
135 - The Dodgers better get Wolf or someone like him. The rotation as it stands now is going to wear down as the season progresses and the bullpen will have already pitched too many innings to compensate.
http://www.aguilas.com.do/index.php?option=com_rsgallery2&page=slideshow&gid=27&Itemid=109
Raffy's eyes look like he had been hitting the pipe just before meeting Druw.
Finally, its nice to see Andruw doesn't have to fly commercial.
That sounds fair, and even though its sad to see him leave, I can understand why the Dodgers wouldn't want to chance with him in arbitration.
That reality puts into perspective all of Ned's talk of "great respect" and this notion that not wanting to take a chance is "fair". If they agree to pay him more and he doesn't deliver, it'd be easy to accept as simply the team paying him some money this year that they didn't pay him over the last three years. You might say that in giving Saito the benefit of the doubt here, they'd be playing with money that would already be Sammy's had salary truly matched skill and performance.
That's the Santiago airport, which I don't believe is international. Its likely that he flew commercial to either Santo Domingo, or even Puerto Plata, and then took a small commuter flight to Santiago. Hence the walk on the tarmac.
Unless you feel that players in their first 3 years deserve more than the minimum, than I am not sure how anyone is underpaid. Its a fact that teams have all the power up until the first opportunity for arbitration, after that its a battle.
not saying furcal didn't give his best effort. and i'm aware that injuries are part of the deal (but thanks for pointing it out). that said, the man didn't hold up his end of the deal, regardless of why. i have a feeling if you were in that spot, and you could get generational money regardless of where you signed, you'd do the deal that would make you feel better - the one that helps you finish whatever you started. an open market doesn't mean he is obligated to get every last penny.
If I were Furcal, I would go where I'd be happiest - whether that depends on money or location or teammates or whatever - but I certainly wouldn't feel any obligation to the Dodgers. If there's a better offer elsewhere, he should leave with his head held high.
i really hope wakes up this year...
for what it's worth, pierre's VORP in 2007 (his last season as a full-time regular) was about 13. burrell's, last year, was about 38... i mean, i don't pretend to know if VORP is the best way to say which player is better, but on that scale the numbers don't seem close...
hmmm. i can agree with most of that. and if he feels he'd be happier in KC or wherever, then, sure, he should take that. i guess all i'm saying is i'd feel a little less than my happiest if i'd accepted the kind of money he accepted from the dodgers, then - for whatever reason - didn't produce as much as i could... and followed up that stint by taking fractionally more money to play elsewhere... but, hey, i buy my self respect at zodys...
Sorry, but for my philosophy here, maybe it will help legal world familiar you if I say that I don't credit you for not killing anyone, as there's a law in your state that proscribes death for you should you do so with the requisite intent. So it might not be notions of humanity and compassion that stops you from killing, but instead mere self-interest. If, however, you jump into that raging river to save the drowning soul in the absence of the special relationship, then all the credit is yours.
There is a weird notion in sports that I sometimes hear on this board. This idea that is put forth does not translate to any other place in our lives. Namely fans actively suggest and in many cases expect that players "take less" to play for their favorite team or out of some sense of morality / loyalty to the fan base or employer
I won't get into the player vs. owner and all that entails other than saying that players are production units that have limited periods of value and it is only rational for players to maximize their earnings while they can. Baseball does not look out for the best interest of the player; baseball looks out for baseball. The player is forced to look after the player.
Outside of that, even after achieving a certain level of wealth a particular player wanted to do a home town discount, it would only be possible if it was very close to current market for that player. The MLBPA deeply frowns on players taking less than market in terms of either dollars or years. The MLBPA is always looking to set the market higher so that it benefits all of its members, if stars start signing for less the whole thing falls apart
Finally, how many of you would stay with your current job out of loyalty (knowing full well that you will be replaced ruthlessly once you are not as good as you are today) and not go work somewhere else that was offering greater security and more money.
I lied, that wasn't "finally", this is Finally, when players go play for another team it really is more like they are moving to another branch or division within the same company than that they are going to work for a competitor. MLB is more like one big company with geographically dispersed divisions with regional CEOS than it is like Coke and Pepsi
Sign me a confused capitalist
Andruw's still soft in the middle and sporting the manboobs too.
http://tinyurl.com/65qkh5
so when you're transferred from santa monica to anchorage, you take it because, as a production unit, you could get, say, 10 percent more money? if the answer is "no," then you're taking into account factors that aren't purely monetary. if you're wearing something other than costco jeans or driving something other than a hyundai or eating corn flakes that don't happen to be generic, then you're taking into account something other than money. (hey, biz. school is for everybody, right?)
i haven't read anybody in today's thread suggesting that furcal stay in LA out of loyalty. i've said he should stay in LA, even if it means turning down a fractional pay increase, because i'm guessing he'll feel better about doing so. furcal - and maybe it's just projection - seems to me like a guy who might want to do that. he was paid more than a million bucks a month over the past three years. with that money in his accounts he and his family and his heirs have options - including an option of playing out a second contract that would allow him to perform up to his abilities for the money paid.
and, sure, the union would like everybody to take the highest offer. but highest isn't necessarily "best," and, given we're talking fractional differences in offers, i'm guessing the union wouldn't cause a ruckus.
would the dodgers treat furcal as well? probably not. but that doesn't mean it's not in his interest to do better.
as michael corleone said: "it's just business."
good question. and i don't know what the answer would be.
my guess is the offers for furcal are ballpark close, and that the differences are about guarantees, not dollars. but it's just a guess.
i'm not arguing that the guy do something out of moral obligation. (who knows what that even means, anyway? i don't.) what i am saying is the guy might be happier playing out a second contract for a team that already paid him pretty well in a deal that didn't quite pan out.
i am not - repeat, not - suggesting furcal is a jerk or that he jaked it with the dodgers. quite the opposite, actually.
My comment was not meant to be purely specific to Furcal but rather a comment on a somewhat frequent topic either here or when I talk to sports fans in other forums. The thing that strikes me as strange is that sports seems to be the only place where this is even suggested. No one would suggest that the top shoe sales person at the local Nordstrom earning a grand a week, but who was sick for several weeks during peak times, not go to Bloomingdales when they offer him a better deal.
For your question to me - Wow, Anchorage or Santa Monica, pretty extreme choices, you could have at least given me a major league city (they all seem to have their charms to one degree or another) but of course I take it for 10% (10% of CC's contract is $16M! the average raise outside of baseball is under 4%!!!), or for longer guaranteed years, or larger signing bonus...
I hope that I would realize that the average big league career is about 6 years and that a very long one rarely last over 15 years. With that in mind I would value each and every year as an earning opportunity that neither me nor my family will likely ever see again. A four year deal represents about 25% to 50% of my total earnings that I will ever see from the skill I do best in the world, a skill that runs out on me by the time I am 40. I would take that very seriously (especially with a history of injury) and would never let notions like loyalty or comfort or that I owe the organization anything get into my head. I would realize that my 4 years in Anchorage would be followed by 50 years (if I am lucky) living anywhere I want in the world
Would I do it for 10% of my current salary today? I dunno, I would actually looking more for guaranteed income that could get me. For the record, I have already done it before, I moved to North Carolina for 4 years just for the money, the options, and the title. I didn't want to live there, I didn't like living there, but I did my 4 years and have returned to this sunny burb wealthier than if I simply stayed. Wealth counts.
Specific to Furcal I don't think he owes the Dodgers any discounts at all. By all accounts he played hard when healthy, played well when healthy, and when injured worked his tail off to get back as quickly as possible. It's all labor, it's all work. Playing or rehabbing, he is just another guy going to work.
This is all hypothetical of course, but what if the employer retained his position for him in the highest selling area of the store, paid for the best doctor in town to tend to him while he was sick, delivered homemade soup every day, and threw a welcome back party the day he or she got back to work? And then offered essentially the same money as Bloomingdales? Wouldn't it seem a little ungrateful if the person left?
All I'm saying is that employers in the real world sometimes do treat their employees as more than a "production unit" and employees sometimes see value in a particular company above and beyond the next paycheck.
Well now I think we are really getting off the map
I dont think there is anything to suggest that the Dodgers did any less or any more for Furcal than any other team does for their injured players.
I dont know that being a Dodger is really better than being anything else
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.