Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Guaranteed no more than $2.5 million according to press reports, Takashi Saito will put on a Red Sox uniform in Spring Traning, along with former Dodger teammate Brad Penny, whose base salary has been reported at $5 million. Both pitchers have passed their physicals.
* * *
Voting for the 2009 Weblog Awards has begun. I don't think this is the kind of thing a local blog like Dodger Thoughts could seriously compete in, but follow the link to make sure your favorite blogs in all categories are represented.
Or roughly what the Dodgers pay each season for Ja(y)son Schmidt.
On an unrelated note, Ned Colletti is, for all intents and purposes, a wealthy man.
Ned=Me
That's not a good equation for Dodgers fans.
Whatever.
That sounds like progress to me.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLQ3CZJ3onw&feature=related Youtube has it up if you want to watch it streamed. Although, I don't know if its subbed or not.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/2009/01/dodgers-lose-saito-to-red-sox.html
What I really have a hard time understanding is why there seems to be absolutely no discussion of bringing Lowe back. When he was looking for 4/60 (or more) that made more sense. But with the numbers down around 3/36, plus the lingering uncertainty around our 4th and 5th starters, doesn't it make sense to reopen those discussions?
But of course, I could go back to the archives and see what's there.
Was there kind of a sense that Lasorda was campaigning for Alston's job?
Man, I need to learn more about those 1970s teams. Are there any books you would recommend that have some insight into those 1970s Dodgers?
24 Sounds about right.
http://articles.latimes.com/2008/aug/10/sports/sp-lasorda10
I don't think there has been much written about the pre-Lasorda years, the Dodgers did win the 1974 pennant but if Tommy was great at anything, he created a new media buzz and he was the star.
And this can't be overstressed, you still only had one or two games a week available to watch, the Dodgers might have started broadcasting on ONTV by '77 but aside from the occasional road trip to Cincinatti and San Francisco, your access to the Dodgers was limited to the radio and sports page.
Besides the wonderful powder blue uniforms, Gorman Thomas playing CF, and Don Sutton's perm, my favorite part so far is a shot of owner Bud Selig pacing Baltimore's Memorial Stadium smoking a cigarette using one of those classic cigarette holders.
To be fair, Lugo's FanGraph values in the 3 years prior to joining the Red Sox:
2004: $12m
2005: $14.2
2006: $7.3
Average: $11.2
Alston was a very proud man who often felt he wasn't given much credit for his ability as a manager. Many critics viewed him as a manager with deficient strategic skills or someone who was woefully out of touch with his players, especially in the late 1960s and early 1970s.
Alston was not considered to be the Phil Jackson of baseball managers. During Alston's time as a manager, Casey Stengel was regarded as the best manager, primarily because he had the Yankees to manage. Then the mantle (but not Mickey) turned over to another generation of managers in the 1960s. There were younger guys (at the time) like Hank Bauer and Dick Williams and Red Schoendienst and Gil Hodges were considered to be better managers.
I'm not getting Harvey's Wallbangers. I'm getting some Red Sox history video. Hope I don't anger berkowit28 by pointing that out.
I also left out that Alston also spent much of his career overshadowed by Leo Durocher.
It was on this morning and I recorded it. I believe it is on a few times later in the month.
No, Chris Withrow in the 2007 draft.
The difference between $0 and $2.5 million is pretty substantial, so is the guaranteed roster spot.
Oh, okay. My channel guide still doesn't list anything but "Major League Baseball" for the programming. Makes it hard to plan for things.
Kenshin Kawakami is a Brave.
However, for some reason 2009 has not started out so well. After not receiving a paper on January 1, I received the paper on Friday & Saturday. Since then, I have not received the paper for 4 straight days. I have called to complain 5 different times and it has yet to produce a newspaper.
It's hard for the print edition to stay afloat if the carriers won't deliver the paper.
"While Moose [Haas] did his part, the Brewers performed surgery on Tommy John"
It's that kind of wit that helped land Uecker the part on Mr. Belvedere.
That wit got Marilyn Manson cast on the show, as well.
Wasn't that rumor debunked?
It was so ridiculous in the first place, I'm not sure debunked is even the right term.
The Brewers bullpen lost Torres and Gagne, so Hoffman had a pretty good idea that he would be the closer because the team didn't have a lot of other options.
Hoffman could see that the Dodgers had Broxton.
It wouldn't surprise me if Joe Torre felt the same way--or even if he was the primary advocate of the policy. (Then there's Larry Bowa, but he wouldn't want to be in the same post with Edward II.)
If Saito is back to form, the Red Sox pitching staff from top to bottom looks pretty great.
I love the Dodgers but they are run by a classless bunch.
Just contract us. I am so tired of this.
It is easy to panic and either see this fairly woeful offseason as either Colletti incompetence or McCourt intractability in allowing him to spend, whether due to his "cash flow" issues or the economy. Extrapolating further, it is actually even conceivable that Mccourt is gutting payroll for a potential sale. Much of what has happened is a mystery to me. Perhaps all of this is in preparation for Manny and a frontline guy like Wolf or Andy P. Either way, if we signed one of those guys, we would have three lefties conceivably starting for us in Wolf, Kershaw, and Estes.
I don't think the team is in as bad a shape as I think they are. If that makes sense.
I had to change the channel. It was too awkward for me.
Well, in talking with executives and lawyers in baseball this week, they said the powers that be probably would greatly frown upon this type of system manipulation. And as one executive said, the teams involved, even by discussing the matter, might be guilty of collusion, in a winter in which there are rumblings on the union side about collusion. We'll see whether it comes up.
1) I had forgotten Gorman Thomas played centerfield (!) for that team.
2) In watching old games, it always seems that over the years, batters have gotten more compact (in their swings), while pitchers have gotten far less so (in their windups).
Why might this be?
Can we acknowledge that at least on some mechanical levels, ballplayers today are "technically" superior to those of yesterday?
Meanwhile, it seems that everybody (on both teams) in that Don Larsen game was bailing out on every pitch, trying to yank just about everything. Today, batters are almost uniformly more compact and balanced in their swings.
The average major league swing and windup today seem aesthetically and technically superior to those of the 1950s, and I don't think it's a matter of taste.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/thedailymirror/2009/01/january-10-1959.html
I'm in the middle of Harvey's Wallbangers too (recorded earlier). At 5 pm PST there's a real (full, it looks like, or nearly) game on: game 7 of some NLCS between Cardinals and Mets. That must be 2006 since that seems to be the only such matchup that went to 7 games.
January seems awfully late to announce the NL Rookie of the Year award.
Did that Oscar Robertson guy ever pan out?
He was much better (about 10 ppg) than that scrub from West Virginia!
Sausage fest! Oh wait, wrong choice of words.
Next time I'm up north (February?) we can hit it up.
Wonder if Penny/Saito will be the next Jayson Werth?
Either you get busy living or you get busy dying.
Not saying that I agree with the proposition, we can have that discussion another time, but I'm willing to concede in the interim that it isn't frivolous or in bad faith to argue that we have a reserve clause since some might be unjustly enriched if some weren't allowed to recoup the cost of job training in some way, shape or form. But, again, can't say that about Sammy. And they knew it. And so you might say that when some speak of dream fields, I see Sammy picking cotton.
Lastly, as a Rays fan, this certainly makes things more interesting. I hope Sammy does well. Him and his new mates will just have to find another to way lose, that's all. And, Sammy, you here? Sorry, Sammy, but Aki's gonna have to take you over the wall, kinda like this:
http://tinyurl.com/a72shg
http://tinyurl.com/88m67t
http://tinyurl.com/9nmul7
Is there a link for that interview? Was it a radio spot?
EVERY player is used up and spit back out when they're no longer useful to a team.
Unless you're on Ned Colletti's team.
Can I be Frank Layden?
When asking a player why he didn't play defense or rebound, he asked, 'was it ignorance or apathy?' The player responded, "I don't know, and I don't care."
Ya, she was being interviewed by Lee Hamilton, and when asked if two years was a line drawn in the sand, she quickly said no without hesitating.
She also mentioned that the club is expecting big things from James McDonald.
Also gave the same ole "be patient, deals could come at ST" and the ever popular "the club on opening day might not necessarily be the club at the end of the season".
Either way, I just found it interesting that 2 yrs on the contract is not what the media is portraying it for the Dodgers
Certainly past performance is strong and perhaps overused metric to base that pay on but no one deserves to be compensated more just because they got less a few years ago.
Lord help us if Tommy Lasorda is relegated to similar status on the new MLBTV.
Classic Lee Hamilton. The local media writer for the Union-Tribune, Jay Posner (the guy Ryan Leaf famously yelled at), loved to poke fun at the taped and often outdated status of Hacksaw's interviews.
it was today
Where is Hacksaw these days?
"A tradition like no other."
Much like the Tootsie Pop question, the answer is three.
Anyway, it could be mentioned that a lot of people here wanted to kill Colletti after he released Hee-Seop Choi, and the impulse to homicide doubled when Epstein picked him up, since of course, Epstein is brilliant. Then when Epstein released Choi? Not exactly a lot of mea culpas along the lines of "Sorry, Ned, guess you were right all along."
completely unrelated: does anybody know offhand when the MLB Hall of Fame results are announced?
10:30am Pacific on Monday, on both MLB.com and MLB Network.
I've been noticing all season that the clock will hit zero and the team still takes an extra second or two to snap the ball. It is definitely more forgiving than the NBA shot clock.
I think the officials just wait until they see the center move his hands to snap the ball.
However, it's one of those things that it's difficult for the brain to process as fast as you would think because the official who makes the call is lined up in the defensive backfield and has to look down at the center and then up at the play clock.
$5m base salary
$500k for 160 IP or 55 games
$500k for 170 IP or 65 games
$500k for 180 IP or 75 games
$500k for 190 IP or 35 games finished
$1m for 200 IP or 50 games finished
http://tinyurl.com/849ns8
Looks like Norm had decided schematic advantages over Washington and Washington St. this past season...
What exactly does that mean? It can't mean what it seems literally, right?
I mean, does Penny have to be on the mound when the game concludes at least 35 times to collect the 500K? 50 times to collect the 1M?
If the starter throws a complete game, there is no "game finished" awarded.
Last year's leaders in each league were Jose Valverde with 71 and Francisco Rodriguez with 69.
I agree and more important the additional pitching pick-ups seem so blah,, both personality and talent. The thought of Brandon Looper is now sounding exciting! I am now beginning to hope that we are saving some of our money for Andy Petit. Our rotation needs much help and I would love like many here to have Lowe back or perhaps take a gamble on Sheets, but we need someone to pitch some serious innings, and I can't see Vagras or Estes being able to do that.
Any chance you have the league leaders in games finished for middle relievers? By definition, I wouldn't think it would be many. Certainly not 50.
That game sounds more fun than the typical "Pac-8 Game of the Week" I watched as a wee lad on Channel 4.
The top 5 in the AL were all closers: Rodriguez, Papelbon, Rivera, Nathan, and Soria.
There was no pitcher in the top 10 in either league who was not a closer at least at some point last year.
Scully: No decision on retirement from Dodgers
http://tinyurl.com/axhb37
Kuo as Dodgers closer?
>> "I think I'm better suited to being a reliever because I don't have a big assortment of pitches," Hong-Chih Kuo told Taiwanese reporters last month. "But I may need another two to three years to be ready as a closer." <<
http://tinyurl.com/9lzh4b
By far the most annoying ad ever.
>> Amid simmering controversy, the move sets the stage for Miles to continue a comeback attempt from major knee surgery and adversely affect his former team's salary cap situation in the process. <<
http://tinyurl.com/8umj4t
No, but I have seen quite a few Chevy ads (w/Howie) watching football today.
All I can say is Penny & Saito will make them Yankee-Redsox rivalry games more entertaining for me.
That's Saito's ERA+ for 2008.
I'd argue the loyalty the Dodgers needed to show wasn't to Saito, it's to us, the fans. A flyer on a guy with Saito's upside would've been smart, not kind.
Saito pitched 5.2 innings after the All-Star break. There are legitimate injury concerns.
Ng replied that the Dodgers are fortunate in that they have plenty of young pitchers including Kershaw, McDonald, Billz, and Stultz. I think the fact that she included Stultz in this group tells me that upper mgmt hasn't forgotten about him and his ability to contribute. Whether or not is given a fair chance is another thing altogether.
She added that there was no way to patch things up with Penny. He basically had to leave town and start over somewhere else. She said if Penny is healthy, he should be a strong acquisition for BoSox.
The question might also be if Lowe interested in those numbers. He rejected the 3/$36m offered by the Mets.
From what I remember he also felt "under appreciated" I'm not sure why the Yankees didn't go after him, he is a reliable & "clutch" pitcher.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
My obelisk is permanent I fear. It's not done with a "Magic Slate."
I never knew before tonight that Harry Wendlestedt asked Wade Boggs for his hat with 2 outs in the 10th. Jinx!
These are tough economic times, and such fan reaction is very impressive, a tribute really to Plaschke & the Power Couple, who have made such a compelling case to accept whatever.
http://www.latimes.com/sports/baseball/mlb/dodgers/la-sp-simers11-2009jan11,0,1451200,full.column
Gauchos lose!
Btw, thinking of getting the CBS College Sports All Access subscription to watch college games online? Skip it. Besides involving the Silverlight player, it doesn't work more than half the time anyway. I got a trial to check out Big West games and it's hardly worked on any of my computers. I'd contact them for a refund for the month, but will probably get sucked into a customer service vortex. Feh.
What will happen first: Underdog watching a Big West game on his computer, or me receiving the LA Times? I'm waiting with baited breath.
I'm picturing Eric with a worm on his tongue.
Another one-and-done is Johnny Cash's somber track "God's Gonna Cut You Down," which reliever Joe Beimel tried.
I'll have great memories of Saito, and that's not incompatible with thinking that this was a pretty good decision not to bring him back.
I used to love seeing Nomar hug Saito after every save.
Or lose.
I think we both lose regardless, so at least there's that.
Ha! Oops.
That really was a cool video on the Brewers.
After the Yankees signed Teixeira, they had too many outfielders as Swisher was supposed to play first.
read it on the ESPN ticker.
I would have liked to have Sabathia on the team for two or three years and after that the Dodgers should have two aces in Billingsley and Kershaw, solid #2 or #3 pitchers in Elbert and McDonald, Martin coming up maybe for a #5 pitcher, and hopefully Miller creating Miller time somewhere in the mix.
Three years from now, do the Dodgers really want or need to pay CC $22MM+ for 5 more years? Could they have signed Manny for 2 years already? So what is Simmers saying other than nothing?
It's a simple fact that the deadline for signing Manny is after the deadline for renewing season tickets. So what exactly is one supposed to do?
http://www.wfaa.com/video/gmtgeneral-index.html?nvid=319817
Nothing substantial, but a few HS clips are shown and he talks about playing the Rangers in June.
You call Dodger fans "zombies." Why? A fan is a zombie unless he demands that his team match some ideal of perfection before he graces the team's stadium with his presence? That's not a fan, that's a front-runner, and a front-runner is what Simers is, calling the Dodgers ridiculous names like "The Choking Dogs" when they go through any sort of adversity, but licking their shoes when things are going well. The last thing the Dodgers should want is fans who resemble Simers.
The guy is a buffoon and he knows it. And, he's made alot of money being a buffoon.
215 I want to see it, but am resistant because it appears to be a bit of a fantasy, which is unfortunate because Clint can be so great, e.g Unforgiven, Perfect World.
I saw doubt last night. Very interesting.
Oh no you di'nt...!
On that note, watching one of my favorite actors Peter Dinklage in Narnia was tough to stomach. I'm a big SciFi/Comic movie buff but the Narnia movies are real crap because the actors are terrible. When you see child actors from around the country like the ones in Slumdogs or The Fall you get a real sense of what a good child actor can do for a movie.
Did you see Dinklage on 30 Rock this week? He was very good.
225 - I interviewed him a few months ago.
http://tinyurl.com/87et68
Paul Pierce has left the game in Toronto with an injury. Kendrick Perkins is already out for this game.
http://tinyurl.com/9p9wys
-Jason Bourne
Yes, his acting was solid as usual but I thought that episode was very weak.
Many things are right with baseball but boy could we use a dynamic national announcer.
Maybe ESPN would've let Vitale do football is FOX asked real nice.
I can't find the clip, but there is a pretty funny video of (a fake) Joe Buck calling great moments in history, and showing no emotion for things like the Hindenburg crash.
Joe Buck started going downhill for me when he completely overreacted to the Randy Moss fake pants pull down at Lambeau Field. Moss was called disgusting without context (Green Bay fans are notorious for mooning the opposing bus as it enters and exits the parking lot). I thought it was hilarious.
I saw this link from a Bill Simmons column a few months back, but Drew Carey has taken the mantle from Buck as the least exciting announcer in human history:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JMFFGFmn20k
Bob Barker is spinning in his grave. (I know he's not dead)
Dick Enberg has really grown on me through the years.
You should really have a doctor look at that.
242 So?
I blame Molly for our morning woes today.
she started it.
Does hosting a game show make actors/comedians crazy? Ray Coombs, Louie Anderson, now Drew Carey.
You and he must really hold mediocre-at-best sitcoms and improv shows no one watches in high regard.
22. Does anyone know why Walt Alston retired with 4 games left in the 1976 season rather than after the season?
I remember a radio interview with Alston about a week after he left, the interviewer asked him why he had decided to retire, Walts reply was 'I 'didn't retire I was forced out.' That interview started my loathing of lasorda, as far as I'm concerned he's the madonna of baseball, great at self-promotion.
The idea that the mccourts are cash strapped might not be too far fetched. The tax breaks owners get when they buy a team are only good for 5 years. So they're going away and with the economy and the payments they have to make to murdoch it is plausible that the fact that they really couldn't afford the team in the first place might be coming home to roost. It's a nice idea that they are gutting the pay roll in order to put the team up for sale- Come on Eli Broad!!
As far as them being classless, wasn't that a given in the way they treated Dan Evans and Depo? Telling Evans that he could 'interview' for the GM job rather than just telling him out right that his services were no longer wanted was as classless as you can get as well as just being gutless.
It's a nice idea that they are gutting the pay roll in order to put the team up for sale
If they were gutting the payroll, they would be making Padre-esque moves this offseason rather than spending any money to retain Blake and Furcal.
--
I love Peter Dinklage. He was even good in the crummy Underdog movie!
--
Well since y'all brought it up, these were my picks for Best of '08, even though I may very well change my mind on a few of them at some point.
http://tinyurl.com/8oobcy
Would love to see your own lists in the comments there! I've since seen Gran Torino and enjoyed it but had too many problems with it for consideration.
That and Happy-Go-Lucky are the only movies on your list that I saw that I had big problems with, though I'm in the minority on both.
251. I can dream/hope can't I??
Crushing dreams just because you're view makes more sense is just wrong! ; ^)
Dodger Thoughts is so entrenched in my life that I thought you meant Branch Rickey the DT commenter rather than the baseball executive who made those cool strike zone strings. :)
___
& here is something from Saito from the same AOL read "I'm very excited; obviously there is excitement playing for a new team," Saito said. "I know that obviously Daisuke and Okajima are there right now and I've met them several times in the past. I also understand that there is a lot of Japanese staff working with the team. Atmosphere-wise, it's going to be a very nice fit for myself. I'm just very, very excited to be a Red Sox right now."
___
Let's see
1) Large chunks of the Westside
2) Portions of LACMA
3) MOCA
4) Parts of the Music Center
And people want him to bail out the LA Times, the Dodgers, and the putative LA NFL franchise probably.
I think Buss and Sterling should sell their NBA teams to Eli Broad also.
The Kings and Galaxy can still be owned by Anschutz.
Anyway, the Giants FG specialist and ageless wonder John Carney just missed a 46-yarder.
2005: 0.0
2006: 0.1
2007: -0.4
2008: -0.7
Not for that reason but more out of bitterness (and a small wager I made): go Steelers!
For the older kickers, I've read that kickoffs take a lot out of them. It's much more of a strain on their legs. And there really isn't much else that it makes sense to rest for them.
While kicking may look like it doesn't seem like hard work, I would assume that a leg can just as tired as an arm.
Gary Bennett: 0.4
Brad Ausmus: 0.2
Eli Broad is buying Rule 7 too?
Is the marginal difference in ratings for the Super Bowl affected that much by the participants?
I believe the first 49ers-Bengals Super Bowl got very high ratings.
Yeah, that's why I'm on the fence about it. There's also the strategic advantage of having a guy that can just boom the heck out of the ball into the endzone on kickoffs.
I guess it's a battle between a backup on special teams coverage or the 2nd kicker, so it's not a huge cost to have the extra kicker.
269 - What's that based on?
Ausmus did win a Gold Glove in 2007, for what that's worth. I'd rather have he or Ardoin (or myself) over Gary B.
OK, that was very good.
The idea that Hellboy was better then (Iron Man or Dark Knight) just dropped you several notches, and you were the reason I rented the Visitor.
Still I'll be using that list to rent a few movies from Greencine since you have built up quite a reservoir of goodwill with previous recommendations.
Fangraphs.
Can you buy Criterion Collection DVDs through Greencine?
Rule 11!
I just bought Criterion's Wages of Fear used at Amoeba. They also sent me the Rialto set (which includes Army of Shadows, Rififi,Billy Liar and quite a few more) as a gift, still have to watch some of those.
And Rule 8!
But if something can be misinterpreted by someone, then it is by, by my reading of Rule 7, a violation of that rule.
-- Consider removing ice cream from sidelines.
-- Take the advice of longtime Lions fan Ben Wodyczyek, 78, and just hit 'em with your purses, you buncha bums.
-- Game plan to keep offense and defense off the field.
I didn't see enough movies made in 2008 to make a top ten list and based on your list I'll be quite busy catching up.
I fully supported the officials messing up the end of that game because I wanted that 11-10 score. Society demanded it.
Nice call Eric, he is a former Dodger (with out looking it up) from what I remember... what makes it more impressive is that I think he caught all those runners with a partially torn rotator cuff.
If a sarcastic comment can have the effect of making the previous commenter feel bad, even if that was not the intention, then it's a violation. If I'm guilty of overmanaging, that's the price of being here.
I wondered about that part too. Spelling aside, that didn't really sound very kid-like. Kids don't usually say "I'm X's daughter/son": they usually say "X is my dad/mom".
that's the price of being here
This [weeze] is the business [weeze] we've chosen.
I do sincerely feel bad for my sometimes unchecked sarcasm.
Now do all the numbers.
Only ∞ to go!
Yeah, I meant all the numbers...
I liked Jefferson D'Arcy.
!@#$%^&*()
(a sort of euphemism for profanity...)
But I like 317 too. Well done.
that is very impressive.
On my Powerbook, it is "alt/option" and "5." I had to try all the keys to find it.
I was going to say, "Just keep typing and you'll get there."
http://www.htmlhelp.com/reference/html40/entities/symbols.html
That sounds like a very typical UCLA-USC basketball game in recent years.
Wait, did they say "blog" or "liquor cabinet?" I can never remember the details.
A guy in my compartment was taken away by German police because his papers weren't in order.
D4P thinks you get too big of an allowance.
--
It's looking more and more like the NFC Championship game is going to be fun for ornithologists.
--
Troy Aikman is like Mr. State-the-Obvious today.
http://www.angelfire.com/fl/TheCard/images/gallery/snow.gif
That's the 1948 Championship game. The Eagles won 7-0.
The Eagles are in the light colored uniforms. The players had to come and help the grounds crew get the tarp off the field before the game as it is was covered in several feet of snow.
The next year, the Eagles came out to L.A. to play the Rams in the championship game. And it rained really hard that day and the Eagles won that game too. The score was 14-0.
Attendance at the Coliseum: 27,890.
At the time the Rams let him go, it seemed like he was getting concussed or breaking a finger on just about every play. Nice to see him make a comeback.
The 1949 Rams completed 192 passes in 12 games that season. Tom Fears caught 77 of them.
Get ready for a lot of hallelujahs.
If I worked at a hotel, and I saw that Jack Bauer or Jessica Fletcher were on the upcoming guest list, I would call in sick and just stay the heck away for a few days.
BTW what the heck was McNabb doing on the Giants sideline pretending to Hug a Giant and picking up their phone? I mean I know you got the game won pretty much but lets be mature now. Troy Aikman said it best "You know sometimes I don't know what goes on in that guy's head."
Some talk he might have given a silent verbal to UCLA.
What is your TV provider? I'm able to record in HD via DVR with Time Warner.
Eric lives in the blessed part of Time Warner's service area.
However, I could record "24" in HD if I chose to.
And I also guess people will not even be able to think Eli belongs in the same sentence with Peyton after todays performance despite Peyton losing in yet another playoff game this year.
I heard it was because he wants to announce on National Signing Day. I guess while he is on television.
The Cardinals are one of two teams that have played in every NFL season. The Bears are the other.
The Eagles and Steelers didn't start until 1933.
Officially, the Ravens started in 1996. Because in the NFL, you can sell your team's history.
I am rooting for Ravens. Cardinals stink too much to be in the Super Bowl.
Do you know where in the Bay Area, Flournoy is from?
The Cardinals are the team I hate the least of the ones remaining. I would move into the "root for them" category if only one thing was different.
Hint: it would conflict with D4P
My friend that is a Raider friend last night said he was rooting for the Chargers because they are from California. That made me sad.
Even if it is between two teams I don't like at all, such as the Ravens/Giants Super Bowl, I couldn't imagine not watching the Super Bowl.
Not always. Sometimes I go to the movies.
I think you are already better at math than I am.
I have still never seen a single minute of the Packers-Broncos Super Bowl.
You could become king of the hipsters.
Except they match the Super Bowl for the irony of watching the Super Bowl.
Bob's Elway (and Favre?) dislike has caused him to miss one of the better SB games ever. I have it on DVD if you ever want me to burn it and mail it to you.
I too missed the Super Bowl to go see the Branagh version of Hamlet.
I didn't skip the Packers-Broncos Super Bowl because of John Elway. I skipped it just to see if it could be done.
--
424 -Ah. I thought that was you, in the front row?
--
That was a heck of a run back by Santonio! This is quite a game so far.
Al Martinez dropped from the L.A. Times permanently.
Rafael Furcal is our new utility man.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
So I ask here, does everyone here enjoy this type of sports where anything can happen? Or do some, like me, like the olden days where you could count on who was good, and if you wanted your team to win, they had to beat the very best?
I didn't watch either game yesterday, and watched the last 5 minutes of the Giants/Eagles game. And I have no interest in the 2nd game today, whomever is playing.
So, do most of you like this, and therefore would welcome a salary cap in baseball?
I'd be interested to hear some responses, as I think I am probably one of the only ones who dislike the current set-up in the NFL and NBA.
I think that happens a lot in the NFL just because of the nature of the sport. Players get injured or old fast in football.
And 37.5% of the teams make the playoffs in the NFL, compared to 26.7% in MLB.
The NBA of course sends 53.3% of it's teams to the postseason.
not My Bloody Valentine 3D. Who the heck approved that dreck!?
*I avow NO knowledge of this from first-hand experience. Seriously.
You must just watch the cruddy teen horror movies.
There are tons of great horror movies.
444 Let me amend that, recent horror movies suck.
You should check out "Let the Right One In" and "Mum & Dad."
The NFL cap is designed to stop a few teams from spending an insane amount of money on the best players and effectively freezing out the competition. The NBA system is designed to decrease the incentive for players to play for all 30 teams before they retire.
There are too many teams in every major sport, and not enough players to support them. The salary cap is used to artificially create balance instead of using a true method of sport where only the strong survive. And of course the draft helps this artificial balance as well.
I don't have a problem with growing the sport. But I do have a problem with artificially keeping the sport at a certain level, especially when the result is such a weak product.
However, maybe I am the only one who thinks the product is weak, hence the reason I asked.
Top 5 Favorite (American) Horror Movies:
1) Psycho (Hitchcock version)
2) The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (Hooper version)
3) Night of the Living Dead (Romero version)
4) Bride of Frankenstein
5) The Shining (Kubrick version)
Old-school, am I? You betcha.
Those are quality, though I have not seen Bride of Frankenstein.
I am neither a Celtic or Laker fan, but I enjoyed them immensley in the 80's, (not so much last year). I am neither a Cowboy or 49er fan, but enjoyed them both in the 90's.
And this is not to say that only dynasties make for good entertainment. I really don't have a problem with who wins, even if it is a different team every year. I just think you should be able to look at the champion, whomever it is, and see greatness.
If not, that movie scared me more then any other I have seen. Or maybe it's not American?
I would probably say almost all the exact same things about "Dawn of the Dead." But I sort of consider it more of a satire/gross-out flick more than a horror film. It's a lot of fun, to be sure -- but there is nothing fun about "Night of the Living Dead." Creepy, pure, dismal horror, made more "real" due to being a tiny, grainy movie made by some people in Pittsburgh on a looooow budget. (But talent will generally shine through, despite your budget...and Mr. Romero is a talented filmmaker.)
Not to rag on Friedkin, for sure -- although I'm not a huge fan of "The Exorcist" or "French Connection," his two biggest pictures, I do generally admire his work. I really like some of the dark horse titles in his repertoire, like "Sorcerer" and "The Boys in the Band" and "To Live and Die in LA."
Jeez, I didn't even think of "Jaws." That scared the heck out of me as a kid. But even then I think of it as sort of a horror-adventure thriller.
It is all about the young girl in "Night of the Living Dead." And the manic opening.
How enjoyable would baseball be if you were a fan of the Royals or Pirates? How enjoyable would baseball be for any of us if it was the Mets or the Cubs against the Yankees or the Red Sox every year in the World Series?
The issue of greatness is separate and distinct from the salary cap. Truly great teams are more an anomaly then they are constant. If there was a team like the '27 Yankees every year, it would diminish what the '27 Yankees stand for. Sometimes, less than great teams win championships because they simply played better than the "great team" (see: World Series, 1988). To me, that's the beauty of sport.
1970's Orioles, Reds, A's, Dodgers, Yankees, and even the bookending Pirates, not to mention the Phillies, Red Sox and Royals were examples of what I'd call greatness.
The 1970's NFL had Dolphins, Vikings, Steelers, Raiders, Cowboys among some others.
Last years Giants, and whomever wins this year are absolute dogs compared to those NFL teams. Last years Celtic team pales considerably to the Celtic teams of the 1980's. Same with the Laker team last year. More importantly, unless you are a fan of either, not nearly as entertaining. Not even close.
I didn't ask if the purpose of the salary cap was to lead to good entertainment. Obviously it is not. I just asked, from a fans perspective, does it lead to good entertainment? Do fans like the result?
my favorite band of all time.
Every time I re-watch NOTLD, I'm so impressed with Romero's directing. He's got an amateur cast, a bunch of local crew members who have mostly been working on commercials and industrials at that time, and he pulls out a genuinely unsettling and scary film. There are obvious influences from "Psycho" (the trowel murder with the swinging lightbulb that you alluded to re "the little girl") and "The Birds" (the whole concept), but he spins it into something so interesting and original.
And then he goes and makes Monkey Shines. ; )
Hey, nobody's perfect!
;-)
Unless your name is Robert Bresson or Ingmar Bergman or Stanley Kubrick, and even then you're only perfect to your fan base...
(i.e. Most Americans despise "Barry Lyndon." I think it's one of SK's two or three best films. Am I partisan? Am I biased? You betcha.)
The Exorcist
The Haunting (original)
Dracula (original)
The Thing (original)
Invaders from Mars (original)
It! The Terror from Beyond Space
Just did some research & the bridge is actually called "Vincent Thomas Bridge" there is a smaller bridge near Rodando Beach but I can't find it on google maps nor google earth.
Isn't it sort of deranged that we constantly have to refer to the "original" versions when we cite them? I had to do that for four of my five choices. Why are there so many awful remakes of classic horror movies?
I like your list (though my reservations about "The Exorcist" have already been duly noted). I like "The Haunting" a lot, despite a truly nutty concept (we're gonna invite all these psychics to a haunted house!). But when it works, it REALLY works. ("That wasn't my hand you were holding.")
I adore both versions of "The Thing." I guess I probably think of them as more sci-fi than horror (though the Carpenter one is quite horrific). Actually, come to think of it, I probably should have considered "Halloween," which is also quite beautifully directed and achieves low-budget horror shocks without being stoooopid.
Haven't seen the old "Invaders from Mars" or "It!" yet, though I know the latter was the bare-bones script basis for "Alien." (which also deserves some consideration in this category, but maybe I think of the sci-fi angle as much as the horror angle. But that one is certainly pretty darned horrific.)
While we're at it, I just wanted to mention to you, Marty, that I really enjoy your posts and they tend to elicit responses from me at a high rate. Keep it up!
I'm gonna be honest you guys "The Exorcist" was scary in epic proportions for me... I think it was made worst cause of my catholic up bringing, but who knows, I just know I was scared for days.
I saw The Exorcist opening night (12/26/73). Scariest experience I've ever had at a theater. People were walking out because they couldn't take it. It's hard at this time to convey what a unique experience that movie was at the time.
Anyway, my favorite horror films include:
Night of the Living Dead + Dawn of the Dead (yes, original)
Jaws
Poltergeist
Psycho
The Thing (original and remake, as noted above, are both great)
The Birds
Peeping Tom
Nosferatu (original but remake is interesting too)
Eyes Without a Face
Suspiria
Rosemary's Baby (still chills me to the bones)
The Shining
Texas Chainsaw Massacre is a classic, too, but I don't know if I can ever watch that one again.
Some of my favorite comic horror films, which I consider a different group, include: Gremlins (which is scary enough, too, I suppose), Young Frankenstein, Evil Dead II (and I, and Army of Darkness), Shaun of the Dead, and Piranha.
Let me just put my knife down so I can go ahead and choke you.
Now, to get to your question of whether the salary caps make it more entertaining for fans, I don't know. I know I find the NFL more intriguing come the last few weeks of the season as teams are battling for playoff spots, because there seems to be a decent amount of turnover when it comes to the playoffs. There's a little less turnover in the NBA playoffs, but then again, more than half the league makes the playoffs (16 teams out of 30). For some, I think, having more teams competing later into the season would have added value. Whereas in baseball we can pretty much write off 15-20 teams after a handful of games, and its pretty much the same 15-20 teams every year.
Also, in my list some of those were scary as a kid, but would not frighten anyone now.
The Time Machine was the first movie I went to at a theater. The morlocks made me sleep with the light on for a week.
The Beast with Five Fingers petrified me when it played on Million Dollar Movie.
But speaking of creepy kids, I forgot one of my all time favorites: The Changeling.
Creeeeepy.
I do think of Psycho as a horror film -- not only scary, even with the black comedy and suspense elements, but an early slasher film as well. Even today there are two scenes in Jaws that make me literally jump in fright. It's much more entertaining than it is scary as a whole, though.
Oh, heck, if I was gonna go for international cinema, I would have definitely cited "Eyes Without a Face" and "Suspiria." My goodness, how could you not? ;-)
And the original "Nosferatu," yes. Creeeeeepy. (though I admire the Herzog one as well)
I probably should have mentioned above that, when I was referring to "Dawn of the Dead," it was the original. Like I said, I'm old-school. God, another pointless remake!
I could care less if I never saw another "Saw" movie again.
I like "Poltergeist" (I saw it on opening weekend, about two weeks before "E.T," and I thought it blew the latter off the map). I like "The Birds," but I got a C on a paper I wrote about it back in film school and I'm always biased against it now... It's pretty good -- Hitch still seemed to have a couple of good pictures in him at that point (through "Marnie," unless you're a fan of "Frenzy" -- which I'm not), and it was certainly one of the most influential movies of the 1960s.
(But I think "Psycho" was probably his best picture -- ahead of such heavyweights as "Sabotage," "Notorious," "Rear Window," and [gasp!] "Vertigo" and "Shadow of a Doubt.") What a maestro! (I haven't even mentioned "Strangers on a Train").
Too many riches! Glad we've got 'em.
I think as a "horror movie," The Shining seems awfully clunky on a first or second viewing. Stephen King HATED it, for example -- that's why he authorized the TV remake.
But on subsequent viewings, as with all of Kubrick's flicks (IMHO), it started to make more sense to me -- the last time I saw it, I felt it was this intense, deeply personal examination of the possibilities of madness inherent in the patriarchal unit. And it was "disguised" as a horror movie.
What can I say? I'm a convert. He's one of my two favorite filmmakers, and his films tend to resonate over time with me in a way that few filmmakers' films do (with obvious old exceptions like Renoir and Satyajit Ray and Welles).
But as a straight-up horror movie, it's clunky, for sure. Give me zombies or "Texas Chainsaw" for that stuff.
Baaaaaahhh!!! He is the guy I wanted the Raiders to hire the year we hired Kiffin.
As for teams now versus the 70's, you are right if they went back in time and played them with their current abilities. My point was only the level of talent on those teams relative to the other players at that time.
But as you also allude to, relatively speaking they don't compare. For example, the Steeler team of the 70's may have had a current payroll in the neighborhood of $100 million or more if all those players had been born in say the mid to late 80's. And of course, then they couldn't have a team like that due to the cap, (my point).
We both agree that expansion played a big role. We disagree on interest in the end of the current NFL seasons, because I find a bunch of bad teams competing for a playoff spot uninteresting, because they are all bad.
I guess I'll sum it up this way. I have long felt that awhile back, some of the sports teams were really good, and then it just seemed that instead of forcing the other teams to become as good as those good teams, they went the other way, and made all those good teams come down to the level of the other teams.
And for me, that makes for a bad product, for the same reason almost every other fan thinks its a good product, "Because anyone can win". I just think you no longer need to be great to win it all. You can be very average and still win it all.
Which scenes?
One has to be the head coming out of the chewed hole in the boat, I imagine.
What's the other one? The shark coming up when Scheider (who just died last year -- darn, I'm getting older) is chumming?
Or the shark jumping onto the boat at the end? (right into the camera)
Intense...
Of course, there was only one good movie in the whole series.
I have a distinct memory of deep fear after seeing it -- I clearly remember getting so overloaded with water fear during a shower that I had to get out in a panic all covered wiht soap and shampoo.
But did I really see that movie when I was 8? If I didn't, back in that universe when would I have seen it. I guess a Movie of the Week type thing a year or two later?
Not unless he traveled to the East Coast to watch it. ; )
It's an awards show for crying out loud!
I saw it on its first network screening (ABC Movie of the Week?), which must have been 1979-1980. They cut the profanity and the tail end of the "severed leg shot," where you get to see the viscera, but they most emphatically did not cut the severed head floating out of the boat. My mother and her husband were working that night, so I was watching it alone, and I was freaked out beyond belief. Scariest thing I ever saw on a television (except for the news).
Alien - best scary/suspense movie
Aliens - best action/sci-fi movie
Alien III - stupidest beginning to a movie I've ever sat through. Lets just throw out the whole reason for being vested in Aliens.
Alien Versus Predator - expected nothing, enjoyed the heck out of it
Alien Versus Predator II - worse movie of 2008, and it had some tough competition
And I'm the same age you are...
Yeah, I heard that one was a real dog. I did, however, manage to rent "Jaws IV" ("The Revenge" ?) at my grandparents's house in summer of 1987. Suffice to say I won't be renting it again in this lifetime.
"Jaws 2" was okay. That was the one with all the terrified teenagers having a regatta. That was the one where the shark eats a water-skier. And a helicopter, to boot!
It's funny tracking back and thinking of the world many of us grew up in where you either saw a movie on release, saw an edited version if you planned and watched its scheduled appearance, or saw it 10 years later when VCRs and cable emerged.
Isn't there an "Alien 4" out there, too? With Winona Ryder? How was that one?
I re-watched Alien 3 after I went to college and I found a new appreciation for the movie. David Fincher did a good job of directing again.
It is just so-so, but at least it is a little weird.
It won't go on Jean-Peirre Jeunet's highlight reel; that is for sure.
Here's a thing that bugs me about the way they edit the show. The secret ingredient comes out and . . . both teams dash off and start cooking. But in the real world, they just must have taken a moment somewhere there in the first five minutes and, you know, jobbed out dishes and sauces and whatnot. They can't just conjure these dishes without some moment of planning/organizing.
So how come they never show that part, or even hint at it? I'd find it really interesting, and I bet that a lot of folks bent enough to actually watch Iron Chef would as well.
Alien.
No doubt. Saw it when I was too young to be seeing it, and kept me on the edge of the seat -- traumatizing me even. (The alien popping out of John Hurt's stomach is like permanently etched into my psyche.)
Did you get my email awhile back, a reply to you?
Often the contestants and iron chefs can tell what the ingredient will be from looking at the other ingredients in the pantry.
>>"We just had to come to the conclusion that Sasha's just an emotional player that plays by the seat of his pants, and that's about it. He just doesn't have a brain," Jackson said before Friday's game against Indiana. "He's just out there whacking away and working really hard. He's not using his head out there at times. We're working with him, hoping that he will."<<
Seeing Alien again is weird. They got to smoke on the spaceship for heaven's sake.
Yeah, I thought about it, but I just couldn't quite figure out if it was sci-fi or pure horror. I guess the latter -- it's kind of a "haunted house" movie that happens to be set in space.
Beautifully made, to be sure (with superb acting -- almost like an Altman cast; they all interact so naturally), but so simple and visceral. It just works you over. I can't imagine seeing it a theater back when I was 11 (first release) -- I think I would have had a heart attack. I waited until we had StarCase (Massachusetts's pay-station thing before HBO), and then watched it about six times in three weeks.
The Florida Marlins are bringing back the cheerleaders. Warning, possibly not safe for work due to skin of females.
Did you know on Jeopardy they are given a giant book of answers? Basically, there are too many questions for them to memorize, but they can get a bunch down.
What'd you see that in Capricorn One?
Of of my TA's at UCSB dad was a producer on the show and one of my dad's friends was a contestant on the show.
That Iron Chef thing is like telling me there's no Santa though.
Most of S. Kings stories have not moved well into film, but when I look back, I think the best were Carrie and the Shining. And they didn't seem that great until I saw the remakes. But Jack Nicholson and Piper Laurie were so good IMO that the two films Stand.
Well, I have no reason to think my TA lied. This was a history of television class that he was TA'ing for too.
Also, I love the promotion the L.A. Kings are doing with their Youth Movement. The Dodgers need to do something similar.
Spoiler below.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/PIT/PIT199104210.shtml
OK, now that the show is shamed and dishonored in my eyes, here's another question. What exactly are the rules? Wonderful cooking genius aside, food that is fresh and hot and hasn't sat for 20 minutes is always going to be better than food that has been parked. And the cooks sure don't seem to be plating up 3 dishes of everything. So is the rule just that, whatever dishes you can plate during your time are yours, but you make them fresh to serve for judging? And so if you can push out a dish in 10 minutes, it's "done" and counts when you cook for judging? Or do you have to meet some basic standard of having your dishes ready simultaneously?
I think you would have to work on the show to actually know all that stuff.
And I don't think they plate 3 plates of everything, its just one plate that the Judges share, almost like family style?
Generally the best ones, I felt, had the better directors: De Palma, Kubrick, Cronenberg are all uber-competent, hence the better movies. (Although that didn't help Carpenter out, but he peaked early.)
Lots of people hold out their hearts for "Stand By Me," but I have so far avoided it.
"... there was no way to patch things up with Penny. He basically had to leave town and start over somewhere else. She said if Penny is healthy, he should be a strong acquisition for BoSox."
Why exactly did things get to that point between Penny and the team? I saw a story which had Joe saying something like it was best Penny left because he wasn't comfortable with the Dodgers, whatever that meant.
Did I see some reference to his maybe thinking he had to pitch hurt??? Does anyone have a link to a good story about this? Thx.
Oh man--I'm watching some "Planet Earth" thing on the Discovery Channel, and suddenly they are trying to sell me some special collection of "Cristian Music."
well, if you were an adult then I would understand your wife's reservations but if you were a child, I mean come on...
adult. sort of.
I'll be the first to admit that I know next to nothing about film but isn't that a psychological thriller?
Now it is like, great I was horrified by a friggin comedy.
To be fair, they are much closer to my age (added up) than yours.
In terms of comedic-horror, i enjoyed "Severance", it had a bit of a Shaun of the Dead vibe but much more violent and crazy.
And finally, I felt the middle of "The Descent" was very creepy, claustrophobic, and scary. Unfortunately the first 30 minutes is pretty boring and the end is like the end of I Am Legend but underground.. and less realistic. ouch!
Gremlins 2 is hilarious, and the first one is funny, too, but the 2nd one is more cartoonish. (Still, I can see how parts of it would be scary to a kid.)
It's a bit funny that none of the younger players have been signed to protective contracts. Do our young core of at least five,(including DeWitt) feel they have not been appreciated.
I am beginning to feel uncomfortable about this. I'm not into the importance of
clubhouse love, but I don't think the opposite is positive.
As for the young players, this is the first off-season where you could seriously considered extensions and we don't know what will happen. Right now, these players only have to be paid the MLB minimum and really they would be out of line to feel they should get anything more until their servive time requires the Dodgers to treat them that way.
USC is much better off if Dragovic and Shipp are chucking up threes.
--
Yay, Waltz with Bashir won a Golden Globe!
Yay, and {sniff} Heath Ledger won, too.
I read Mike Nolan is going to be your DC.
You can't escape him.
One of those is a false rumor. I prefer Capers, though I guess Nolan will be better as a DC again than he was a head coach, whatever that's saying.
--
Man the GG nominees for screenplay were all disappointing imho except for Frost/Nixon. And they were all adaptations -- they need to have separate categories like they do at the Oscars.
I read that Capers was going to be an assistant, but not DC.
http://www.otb-games.com/cineplexity/
I played it at an annual New Year's Day party I've been going to for some years, and it's a blast.
He is a great actor man...
the first season rocked man.
I was curious how Slumdog did not make your list. Also no Barcelona?
Tina Fey has had a heck of a run, might be the most creative person in Hollywood at the moment. Would be interested in what she could do with a HBO type of show.
>>Los Angeles Dodgers signed RHP Claudio Vargas to a one-year contract.
I really like this deal for the Dodgers. Vargas showed flashes of potential for the Montreal/Washington Expos/Nationals before being traded to the Arizona Diamondbacks where he started putting it together. As a starter for the Diamondbacks in 2005 and 2006, he posted a mid-4.00s ERA before being dealt to the Milwaukee Brewers for the 2007 season. In an abbreviated season cut short by injury, Vargas posted a 5.03 ERA in 134.1 innings, this despite an xFIP of 4.89. Vargas signed a minor league pact with the New York Mets in March and spent most of the year in Triple-A. At the big-league level in 37 innings, he threw for a 4.62 ERA (4.78 xFIP). All told, the best way to explain this signing is that Vargas, for all intents and purposes, replaces Chan Ho Park in the role he will fill and in the effectiveness he can bring.<<
http://tinyurl.com/8lls2o
Also, Diamond Lueng has the Kim Ng interview she did today with Hacksaw up.
http://blogs.pe.com/prosports/mlb/dodgers/
I was at a 24 party, so I missed that, plus the Laker game, plus the USC/UCLA game.
Here's more on the Tina Fey acceptance speech:
http://tinyurl.com/8mby3r
Even worse, I've taken quite a bit of ribbing at said parties because when the previews come up for the next episode(s) I cover my ears and close my eyes very tightly. I look like a child when doing so apparently.
Do you come from Indian descent or English decent?
Either way we would have something in common.
I remember I was home for the summer in college and I was staying on the couch in the family room. There was a Friday the 13th showing every night for the entirety of the series. I got through the first 3.5 showings. What I learned is that if you take off your clothes or intend to have relations out of wedlock, you will die in the next scene.
And if you're being chased by Ja(y)son, don't bother running, because you'll probably trip (multiple times). Plus, he walks faster than you run, anyway.
Oh: and yes, Camp Crystal Lake is still dangerous. So don't bother going there in the first place.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.