Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
* * *
The commenters steal the spotlight. Thanks to Tim Brown of the Times for noticing, and to Bob Timmermann for starting it all. (Bob - do you know where you posted the original reference to "Ghame Over?")
* * *
See that last sentence above? When I was in school, I was taught to put the question mark inside the quotation marks. But now I notice that most people would put it outside the quotes. Anyone have a definitive take?
* * *
Steve King, the other guy in Dennis Cozzalio's tale cited here Saturday, has a short postscript at Hey, Ho, Argento!
* * *
* * *
Postgame update: I'm surprised people questioned pinch-hitting for Derek Lowe in the sixth inning today, since in his last start, people (not just me) felt that the Dodgers should have pinch hit for him, also in the sixth inning:
Lowe was pitching well today, but it was a close game and some extra runs would have been nice. It was debatable then and debatable now, but I think given that the bullpen has been strong, it was a good move to take Lowe out.
I am reluctantly going along with the question mark outside the quotes - though I knew, as Rob McMillin said in comment #29, it had to be a fairly recent phenomenon in this country. I still think the logic is not as perfect as people think. In this sentence ...
I would like to sing "Take Me Out to the Ball Game," but first I must gargle.
... I've never seen anyone put the comma outside the quotes.
As for serial commas, I omit them whenever there is no confusion. Plain and simple. You don't need to have one here, here and here. You can figure out when you need it. That's AP style, isn't it? Give me AP style over Chicago any day.
Oh yeah - baseball site, right?
Lima throwing a no-no through 5
BC
Lime gives up HR before I even finished typing this post.
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/archives/160408.html
Comment #17 I believe.
May 1, 1893
3,000 people showed up at Boundary Park in Washington to watch the hometown Senators rout the Brooklyn Bridegrooms (as they were called that year for their large number of married players), 15-2. Washington pitcher Al Maul would earn one of his 12 victories on the year (against 21 losses) while George Haddock got rocked for the loss (he finished 8-9)
The loss dropped Brooklyn to 1-2 on the young season in the 12-team National League. Eventually Brooklyn would finish in a tie for sixth with Cincinnati with a 65-63 record (despite being outscored by 70 runs on the year), 20 ½ games behind pennant winning Boston.
The biggest change in baseball in 1893 was moving the pitching distance back to its present-day distance of 60'6". The change made offensive totals soar. First place Boston scored 1008 runs in just 131 games, an average of 7.69 runs per game. Overall, the league averaged 6.57 runs per game.
The 1893 Brooklyn squad had a lot of players that we don't know much about. But there were two Hall of Famers on the team. One was an old player toward the end of his career in Dan Brouthers and another just starting out, a young Willie Keeler, whom the Giants sold to Brooklyn in July. Keeler didn't stay long as Brooklyn sent him to Baltimore in 1894 where he had his best years.
Thanks to Retrosheet, Baseball-reference.org and the NY Times
Of course, as with all writing questions with hazy answers, the fall back response is "It's a matter of style"
Call it Lima Bean Time....
Bob,
Congrats on the exposure--this is your 15 minutes. Use it wisely! :) (Speaking of which, Iwish I could find the time to hang around here for at least 15 minutes! Right now, I'm off to Costco. UGH! (Hopefully I'll see TJ Simers there. It's his Costco too!
Great memorial this morning by TJ. You almost wish that's the way Plaschke would write once in a while. (Or was it TJ emulating Plaschke?) :)
i only put it inside the quote if it's part of what i am quoting. i like it that way because it's clearer to the reader, and more intuitive, in my opinion.
SABR members get a ProQuest subscription that includes the NY Times, LA Times, Atlanta Consitution, Wash Post, Chicago Tribune, and Boston Globe.
I figured it would easier to pick the years at random than finding a game on a particular date. Today is the 85th anniversary of the longest game in the history of Major League Baseball. The Dodgers and Braves played a 26-inning 1-1 tie.
One other observation: I have MLB extra innings and this is the first weekend I have been home to enjoy it. (Hence, my posts on Lima and Ward.) At any rate as I surf around and listen to the other games I realize how lucky we are to have Vin. He really is the gold standard. Even Stiener is better than most of these guys.
There is a definitive answer, and Vishal is correct.
"Question marks (?) should be placed inside the quotation marks if the quoted material contains a question, outside the quotation marks if the question is your own. A question, even if it is rhetorical, requires a question mark."
http://tinyurl.com/98kwb
Thus, "(Bob - do you know where you posted the original reference to 'Ghame Over?')" should be changed to "(Bob - do you know where you posted the original reference to 'Ghame Over'?)".
Unless the usage of "Ghame Over" was actually meant to question Brazoban's ability to close games effectively, in which case, "Ghame Over?" would indeed be correct. But that's not the case.
re #17:
here you go, LAT: http://www.darylewardsucks.com
i love sending people to that site.
Rockies (be prepared for some really ugly uniforms today)
Miles 2B
Relaford SS
Helton 1B
Hawpe RF
Atkins 3B
Mohr LF
Greene C
Sullivan CF
Chacon P
Dodgers
Izturis SS
Choi 1B
Drew CF
Kent 2B
Ledee LF
Valentin 3B
Repko RF
Phillips C
Lowe P
Why no Milton today? anyone know?
Seriously though, does anyone believe this stuff works? Supposedly it did for Finley, but what's wrong with just using weights? Finley swears by this stuff though.
Should it be "Manny, Moe, and Jack" or "Manny, Moe and Jack"?
Colon has been amazing. Only 84 pitches so far in the 8th inning.
The serial comma is still called for, otherwise you run the risk of confusion in sentences such as "I'd like to thank my parents, God and Ayn Rand."
More often than you would think.
Not an E. K-WP.
That is correct. Current trends and MLA types might say otherwise, but proper written usage is to always use commas after every item in a list of three or more items (except the last).
http://tinyurl.com/abtyt
Strunk and White, Elemantary Rules of Usage, "In a series of three or more terms with a single conjunction, use a comma after each term except the last."
Isn't Jeter's middle name Sanderson?
Little help?
http://tinyurl.com/m460
I'm not going to attempt to explain them.
Not necessarily. If the scoring decision on Miles was K-PB, that would've been an unearned run.
That was an ugly play by JD.
I guess he lost it in the sun.
Doesn't help his "move Bradley to right" cause though.
I haven't heard a peep about Drew wanting to play CF since early in Spring Training. Has he brought it up again recently? Given how well Bradley has played out there, it seems a dead point.
You can quote the question mark if the person is asking a question, like:
"Where's the beef?" asked Betsy
This is as opposed to asking what a person said, like:
Who said "A rolling stone gathers no moss"?
This is how I was taught to use quotes, but then again I am not a writer, so what do I know?
(Notice appropriate use of question mark and quotations.)
I think they are say Dreeeeewwwwww.
Sounds like a boo.
Very interesting article from Michael Lewis in last Sunday's New York Times Magainze
http://tinyurl.com/ckrgl
regardless of what happens, we might see the Rockies' bullpen by the 5th or 6th.
I agree. Kent's shot was smoked.
Then again, she's 15 years old so sleeping is pretty much her standard M.O.
DBacks up 3-0 at PETCO.
I am a fan, go blue!
Then she would go back to sleep.
She's the Steve Trachsel of cats.
Vinny is right-- how is Shaun Chacon still out there with only two runs on him? Amazing.
I agree. I read a good article this past week about how Wallach has these guys being patient at the plate, which obviously gets the pitcher's pitch count up. It made a lot of sense. The object is to make the starter pitch a lot so we can get to the relivers. I noticed the same thing with Kent last night (or Friday).
Make him pitch to you. He can't find the zone.
It never ceases to amaze me how he always catches what he says.
Carrara should really stop fielding bunts.
Presumably, Wunsch would come in to pitch to Helton.
Walk
Passed Ball
Walk
Single for RBI
K
Walk
FC out at home
Walk for RBI
K
Yes, because it looks cool.
The team record is 72. I think this team can do it without the help of Alex Cora and Mike Kinkade.
The single season record is 148 (Baltimore Orioles, 1898). I don't think the Dodgers will reach that. The Astros had 100 HBP in 1997.
Quit giving Plaschke more ammo.
Plunk Biggio!
http://plunkbiggio.blogspot.com/
From the first post:
"It is not widely known, as far as I can tell, that the Houston Astros second baseman Craig Biggio is closing in on an all time major league baseball record set over 100 years ago. He needs to be hit by a pitch 28 more times to break the career record for hit-by-pitches."
So this guy is keeping track of Biggio's "progress" towards this dubious achievement.
I don't know why Lowe got pulled, but Steiner said he was sitting in the dugout with a smile, so it doesn't seem like an injury.
He does have a history of thumb blisters, though.
and giving a thumbs down to someone in the dugout the following inning.
Where is George Brett? These guys need some pine tar!
Sit down Mohr. Seriously.
A long way to go to reach the record of 95 by the Devil Rays pitchers in 2003.
Whew. Yahoo!
(All rights reserved.)
Ugh.
Was that the worst at bat(Gonzales) in the history of mlb?looked like he was on tranqulizers.
That throw in the back was no accident. Losing your bat once is an accident-- twice, directly at the pitcher, no accident.
2 UDP
Well, gherkin is funny either way.
luis gonzalez, who had lost his bat twice already in two previous pitches, missed and lost his bat again on strike three, as hawpe was stealing second. either purposefully or because he was confused about losing his bat, gonzalez stepped right in front of phillips as he was throwing to second, and the runner was called out because of the interference. double play.
Can anyone here help me get a flight attendant job?
Nice to check in on another w.
Tomorrow starts a three game set against the Nationals, during which I will root for the Dodgers to the horror and disgust of my friends and family (though no one will be surprised). We'll see what happens with his start tonight against the Mets, but right now, the Dodgers look fortunate to miss John Patterson who's been unbelievably sharp all year. Which is sort of random since he's floated around for a number of years and been OK but never really good, let alone great.
Gherkhin is arguably funnier than Gherkin, though I could imagine somone disagreeing.
The jobs are apparently much harder to get than the employees.
FYI, the Angels won 2-1 while getting only two hits.
Izturis went to catch the throw from Phillips and was attacked by a tiger.
Now I'm going to have some friends over, make some margaritas, and grill up some Mexican style chicken and carne asada.
I love weekends
Call it three feet into the warning track, Steve.
1. I was working. I'm doing a part-time gig at the local Staples. They knew I was a baseball fan so they brought me along to give away some free pens.
2. Autograph day: a sucess by every measure. Kent showed up, among many other familiar names. The 2005 team had to split a little early but some good names stuck around--Lasorda was one. Last one signing autographs? Ken Landreaux.
3. I'm in line at concessions and I good-naturedly say I'm there for a Hee-Seop Choi t-shirt. They don't have any and a guy pipes up and say, "He's outta here and soon!"
"What, a grand slam isn't enough? Four-for-five isn't enough?"
"He'll be a goner."
And believe it or not, we had a pleasant conversation after that.
4. We sat in reserved, third base side under the overhang. Good view but the seats were very uncomfortable.
5. Garlic fries are the equivalent of maling your Weight Watchers diet a letter bomb. But Lord, they are tasty!
6. Choi was berry good with bat today, IMHO.
7. Ricky Ledee, I think, left 27 runners on base.
8. Wunsch striking out Helton was huge.
9. Carrara was great but he's a human rain delay
10. Many people left this one-run ballgame early. Most were parents and that's understandable. The ninth inning was a strange one. I was the only one who thought Gonzalez was called for interference because he threw the bat. Everyone thought the Brazoban HBP was on purpose.
Time of game: about 2:48.
Time of last two innings: about 1:48.
Time it took to get from Lot 32 to the freeway: 50 minutes.
Time it took to get to home after getting on the freeway: 15 minutes.
About the Gonzales AB in the 9th, I think it was quite clearly interference. The center field camera showed him blocking out Phillips like a solar eclipse. I don't see how you could not call that.
Agreed. Like I said, I was the only one who thought it was because he threw the bat. Come to think of it, I don't know what was called. I assume it was interference? Anywho...
I thought Choi blasted the ball in his last at-bat. I don't know how the pitcher caught it. Choi looked good at the plate.
By the by, TV watchers, on the Carrara throwing error, was someone supposed to be covering first? Choi seemed caught in between and Kent had too far to go. From where I sat, Carrara threw to an all-but empty base.
The girlfriend's an 8th grade English teacher, and she has a definitive answer for your question mark dilemma. Evidently, the question mark only goes inside the quotation mark when the question mark was originally part of the thing that's being set apart by quotations. Hence, in this case, it would go outside of the quotes.
Really, she's very adamant about this sort of thing.
As for Carrara the "human rain delay," I agree with you. I actually timed him on Wed night. He AVERAGED more than a minute between pitches. I think there's actually a rule about this, but it's never enforced. I almost didn't blame the beachballers. Since Gio also struck out several players, there was essentially no game to watch for all but a handful of seconds over the course of 20-30 minutes.
He did throw to an empty base. When I saw it on replay, I think he was timing his throw thinking Kent would get there in time. Kent got caught up and obviously didn't make it.
Hey, congrats to you regulars for earning the title of "Lively Boys", with special congrats to Bob for the recognition of his great slogan.
A good win for the blue. A hit or two away from turning into a laugher, but as long as we keep getting on-base like we are, we'll be good. Expecting a slugfest tomorrow.
The Dodgers had 4 hits and walked 7 times. Obviously the Dodgers didn't get the timely hits today, but they did have more baserunners than the Rockies.
http://tinyurl.com/a7kfs
DePo has pointedly insisted that he is allowed to take on contracts this year in the form of midseason trades, defending McCourt against the fact that at one point we were promised a $100 million payroll. However, we currently have no gaping holes which absolutely necessitate upgrades. So, either we get another starter (if and when the inevitable D.J. Houlton experiment doesn't pan out bc Scott Erickson just plain stinks) or we upgrade at a position where we're currently getting adequate but not all-star production, e.g. 1B, 3B, LF (if Werth doesn't live up to expectations).
Any thoughts on impending free agents that would clearly help us?
Dodgers: 5H, 10 BB
Rockies: 7H, 2 BB
Saturday:
Dodgers: 6H, 6BB
Rockies: 7H, 1BB
Sunday:
Dodgers: 4H, 7BB
Rockies: 6H, 1BB
The Rockies did outhit the Dodgers this series, but they also had fewer BR (as I pointed out a couple of posts up).
If the Dodgers win the division and do well in the post season, does the "$100 million payroll promise" really matter?
If they need to add a player to make sure they win and increase the payroll at the same time, it's a good thing. If they add a player just for the sake of fullfilling a half empty promise of a certain payroll, I just don't see it mattering.
And no, I'm not saying the season is a failure unless we win the World Series. But I'd like to have the best chance possible. I would bet any amount of money that DePodesta will make an upgrade in the middle of the season, because that's what his track record in Oakland and L.A. last year says - I'm just trying to figure out what would be his best options.
So unless Sweeney likes 3B, he's going to have to live with that fantastic contract he signed with the Royals -- unless Willie Randolph gets his hands on him.
and regarding the fan, while he absolutely shouldn't have grabbed holliday, it seemed to me like the fan had the ball in his hands, but bobbled it right to holliday, and he was instinctively grabbing for the ball back, as if to say "hey, that's a home run buddy, why are you throwing it in?? give it back!" that doesn't excuse him grabbing the player, but it didn't seem malicious in intent.
Eric, the distinction between hits and baserunners is what concerns me. What will we do when we come up against pitchers who can actually get it over the plate.
Eric, the distinction between hits and baserunners is what concerns me. What will we do when we come up against pitchers who can actually get it over the plate.
Don't get me wrong, if the Dodgers have a problem getting hits against guys who actually throw strikes, I will be (am?) concerned.
I too agree that they may have to do something with the 3B situation down the road. I'm not bullish on judging someone with a small sample size (Nori), but if he and Valentin aren't hitting, it's gonna be a problem.
Unlike the media conventional wisdom, I think DePodesta will fix his mistakes (Valentin) if he is indeed a mistake (and the jury should still be out...though I admit that I am less than optmistic). And the 3.5 mil? Well, he's no Chan Ho Park. Or Darren Dreifort.
If there is still a problem with production at 3B, I have no doubt that DePo will find a way to fix it. If Valentin does indeed suck, his contract isn't going to hold the team back. Signing Valentin may have been a panic move, but it was at least a move that won't hurt the Dodgers in the long run.
http://tinyurl.com/cdnfh
This was one of the reasons, I think, behind signing a one-year deal with Valentin.
Funny thing about Valentin's numbers when compared to Beltre, aside from BA he's killing him in every other category:
Valentin
.197/.370/.377=.747 OPS
Beltre
.248/.274/.347=.620 OPS
Valentin has 15 walks to Beltre's 3, and has matched Beltre's HR total of 2, in less plate appearances.
We know he's going to have a low BA; he always does, but he's been a pretty vital contributor this season and has really shown the ability to get on base and make pitchers throw lots of pitches, even when he doesn't hit.
It's still early, but Seattle better hope they didn't buy the old Adrian Beltre. He's looked terrible so far.
J.D. Drew
.256/.400/.439=.839 OPS
4 HR, 19 BB (5 years/$55 million)
Beltre
.248/.274/.347=.620 OPS
2 HR, 3 BB (5 years/$64 million)
This is after Drew started what, 0 for his first 25? You have to figure he will be hitting closer to .300 by season's end.
It's very early, and I'm sure Beltre will turn it around (he always finishes strong), but the key difference between a player like Drew and a player like Beltre is that when Drew is slumping, he still helps the team by getting on base and making the pitchers work.
When Beltre is slumping, he's nearly worthless offensively. As long as Drew continues to stay healty, DePodesta may be looking pretty brilliant by season's end.
I agree that 3B is our best potential candidate for an upgrade, but to be fair to Jose he does have a VORP of 4.0 so far, which is perfectly servicable if he's the worst regular in the lineup. Anybody know how I would be able to find a list of impending free agents?
"If there was a luxury tax for having too many pitching prospects, the Dodgers would be in trouble." -Baseball America
(:
I still think he should be hitting eighth.
Of course, I was thinking Choi was never going to materialize offensively, and he looks alot better.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.