Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
May 8, 1909
A contentious day at Washington Park in Brooklyn ended up with the Superbas (as the Dodgers were sometimes called at the time) losing to the Phillies, 8-2. In the fifth inning, Phillie second baseman Otto Knabe spiked Brooklyn third baseman Ed Lennox. Knabe and Lennox started an argument and Phillies coach Kid Gleason joined in. Lennox, Knabe, and Gleason were all ejected and the Brooklyn fans threw trash at Gleason as he was leaving the field. (Gleason and Lennox would later draw suspensions.) The Dodgers record on the season fell to 7-10.
1909 was not a great year for Brooklyn as they finished 55-98, 55 ½ games out of first. Despite all those losses, Brooklyn still managed to finish sixth ahead of St. Louis and Boston. The NL was top heavy that year as first place Pittsburgh won 110 games and second place Chicago won 104 games. Nevertheless, the 55 wins were a 2-game improvement over the dismal 1908 season.
The Superbas offense was abysmal even by the standards of the Deadball Era. The 1908 home run champ (with 12), Tim Jordan, slipped down to 3 homers. Brooklyn averaged just 2.86 runs per game. The Dodgers starting catcher, Bill Bergen, batted .139 for the season.
But there was hope on the way, in September of 1909, a young player named Zack Wheat arrived in Brooklyn. After 2,322 games in 18 years in Brooklyn, Wheat would finish with a .317 batting average and 2804 hits. (Wheat would play one final year for the Philadelphia Athletics in 1927.) Another key player for the Dodgers for the pennant winners in 1916 and 1920, Hy Myers, also made his debut. Myers played 14 seasons in Brooklyn.
Thanks to the NY Times and Retrosheet
Just thought that I would point out that Andy LaRoche is tearing it up at Vero Beach. Yes it is only single A, but look at these numbers:
126 ABs, 10 2Bs, 1 3B, 9HRs, .357avg, .386obp, .667slg
only 6 BBs though and 21 SOs -
Oh, and happy Mother's Day to any and all of you moms out there.
Watching the Sea Bos game. Hard to believe this is the same Beltre we chanted MVP for.
Icaros, BAD NEWS: I just discovered that MSarg29 is really the International President of the Association of Flight Attendants, AFL-CIO.
http://tinyurl.com/88a24
i think we're due for dr. weaver, and not mr. gascan. he was on a good/bad/good/bad pattern, but then he strung two bad outings together and followed it up with his latest, which was a good outing. so one more good outing would even things out.
How soon in to the game will Morgan mention how good the Reds were and how they did the little things to win? (Despite scoring tons of runs.)
Will Jeff Kent be unfavorably compared to Alex Cora?
Will Norihiro Nakamura be frequently described as being not as good as Adrian Beltre?
Which person who comments here throw his remote at the TV first over something that Morgan said?
Who will say first that the Giants still will be a good team once everyone gets healthy? Morgan or Miller?
Back on the Weaver track, he is young enough that he still has some time to hit his stride, but he reminds me enough of Mike Morgan to make me somewhat dubious that will ever happen. I would love to see him prove me wrong.
Whatever. I just wanted to post here about Dodger baseball. Instead I get personally attacked because I don't think just like you and your friends.
I hope you guys are proud of yourselves.
Or maybe Jon could start a Choi-oriented thread. There is usually only one per week now!
During the game broadcast, can we get Jon Miller to slip in "Joe, that Big Red Machine sure was great, but I still think the 72-74 A's were the team of the decade."
It's 6-0 in the first inning and the 11th man is at the plate.
Can't remember, is the FSL considered hitters league or pitchers?
At the end of 1 inning in St. Louis, Cardinals 11, Padres 0.
Oakland has had a lot of baserunners.
#1: Joel Guzman: 20 years old and currently playing for AA Jacksonville. He's batting .293/.385/.576 with 7HR, 15BB, and 32K in 99AB. Baseball America has him listed as the 5th overall prospect in the game and Baseball Prospectus has him listed as the 7th. Prior to this season, all of his games were played at SS. This season he's splitting his time between SS and 3B. Baseball America sees his defensive tools as best-suited for right field, though he has been able to maintain slightly below average defense at SS throughout his career to date. This is a significant achievement considering his 6'6" frame.
#5: Andy LaRoche: 21 years old and currently playing for High-A Vero Beach. He's batting .357/.386/.667 with 9HR, 6BB, and 21K in 126AB. Baseball America has him listed as the 74th overall prospect in the game. He's probably ready to move up to AA soon, but he has Guzman blocking his path. There are still questions as to whether he will be able to handle 3B defensively as he progresses.
#7: Blake DeWitt: 20 years old and currently playing for Low-A Columbus. He's batting .288/.320/.424 with 2HR, 5BB, and 20K in 118AB. Baseball America has him listed as the Best Raw Power and Best Defensive Player from the 2004 draft.
#25: Willy Aybar: 22 years old and currently playing for AAA Las Vegas. He's batting .337/.398/.545 with 2HR, 11BB, and 17K in 101AB. Baseball Prospectus has him listed as the 34th overall prospect in the game as a 2B. He started out his professional career as a 3B, played 2B all of last year, and has split time between the two this year. Baseball Prospectus rates him strong defensively at both positions.
XX: Antonio Perez: 25 years old and currently completing a rehab assignment with AAA Las Vegas. He's out of minor league options, so once his three week rehab assignment is complete, he will rejoin the major league roster. He batted .296/.379/.511 for AAA Las Vegas last year with 22HR, 61BB, and 87K in 476AB. Baseball Prospectus has him projected at .250/.330/.399 in the majors for 2005. Last year, in the minors, he split his time between SS (71 games) and 2B (44 games). He was ranked as a below-average SS and average 2B defensively. This year, he has spent most of his time at 3B in Spring training and in his current minor league rehab assignment. Jerry Royster, the Las Vegas manager thinks Perez will be best suited to 3B because he has trouble with his footwork at SS and 2B, and footwork is not as important at 3B (http://tinyurl.com/b7qgk).
Once Perez completes his rehab assignment, he will spend most of his games at 3B, though he can backup SS and 2B in an emergency. Aybar may come up at some point, but the Dodgers only want to bring him up if he is going to play every day. Thus, unless Perez tanks or we have further injuries, Aybar should get a full year of seasoning at AAA. Unless we make some trades, starting next year, we will be in the enviable position of having Perez, Aybar, and Guzman capable of succeeding at 3B in the majors.
I now have a much better understanding of why the Dodgers weren't willing to bet the farm on Beltre's single year worth of performance.
So which position player for San Diego is going to mop up?
I bet on Mark Sweeney.
And the Braves are winning 16-0 over Houston.
in the interest of defusing tensions here, my take on LAT's comment was that he probably read the little tiff in the last comments thread, and was making a bit of a joke (not an insult) about it, in a lighthearted way.
icaros, who posts here pretty regularly, has mentioned that he is looking for a flight attendant job, and i got the distinct impression that LAT was just teasing a little by implying that he went and ticked off the wrong person by arguing with you. i doubt he was trying to insult you.
anyway, since LAT hasn't said anything since, that's my interpretation. i'm sure he can clarify if he wants to.
ps. someone needs to start a blog entirely devoted to fisking joe morgan.
MSarg29 -- Just skimming, I don't see that anyone explained this. If it matters, the Flight Attendant's Local thing was this: Icaros a couple of times has called out for connections/contacts that would help him get a flight attendant job. So, I don't read LAT as attacking you at all, but just making a little joke, mostly at Icaros' expense, re how you two have gotten into it a bit on the site. If the flight attendant thing in put you off, that wasn't a dig at you.
More broadly, and not that it's my business, I'd just like to say that I think that you, and your different take (which does not really seem that diffrent to me to than that of others on the site) are indeed welcome here. I realize you don't feel that way, and I think that's too bad, all around. Without dwelling on who said what to whom in the red room with the candlestick, if you're interested in continuing to engage with a basically open mind and with temperate spirits and words, I bet others would be as well. If there's one thing I do know about our host, personal attacks and shutting out differing views -- from or by anyone, regardless of tenure on the site -- are most unwelcome here indeed.
"Now, as for Mr. Beane: Any fan looking at the numbers can see that the A's have stolen only two bases this season, whereas their opponents have swiped 23 bags. Furthermore, Oakland is second in their division to the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim, who have stolen 24 bases so far this year and appear as though they are ready to steal a lot more. Why? Because they are a team that knows how to win. What has Billy Beane ever won except maybe some book award that nobody cares about anyway? Anyhow, I hope all you stat geeks can now see how this works. You'd think a bunch of business-school rejects would know that the only way to get ahead is to steal."
Could Offerman really have been a better option than Marlon Byrd there?
I apologize for overreacting about the comment, I had no idea what any of that meant. That caused me to think some were ganging up on me, about a subject that I certainly dropped yesterday.
Anyway, thank you both for your insight and I will take it to heart.
Go Dodgers - screw Joe Morgan.
Part 1 of the Dodgers games on Mother's Day:
1914 Didn't play
1915 Didn't play
1916 Brooklyn beats St. Louis 3-2
1917 Didn't play
1918 Didn't play
1919 - Giants beat Dodgers, 7-2
1920 Dodgers beat Phillies, 5-4
1921 - Dodgers beat Giants, 2-0
1922 Dodgers beat Reds, 6-5
1923 Cubs beat Dodgers, 5-2
1924 Cubs beat Dodgers, 5-4
1925 Dodgers beat Reds, 9-8
1926 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 3-1
1927 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 5-1
1928 Dodgers beat Pirates, 8-5
1929 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 13-7
1930 Dodgers beat Pirates, 10-2
1931 Pirates beat Dodgers, 3-1
1932 Cubs beat Dodgers, 12-5
1933 Dodgers beat Phillies, 8-6
1934 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 12-7
1935 Dodgers beat Reds, 9-1
1936 Braves beat Dodgers, 5-4
1937 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 7-1
1938 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 4-2
1939 Braves beat Dodgers, 1-0
1940 Dodgers beat Phillies, 5-3
1941 Dodgers beat Phillies, 6-5
1942 Dodgers beat Giants, 5-3
1943 Dodgers split doubleheader with Braves, 5-4 and 1-2
1944 Dodgers split with Cubs, 4-2 and 7-8
1945 Dodgers beat Reds, 10-3
1946 Dodgers beat Phillies, 13-4
1947 Phillies sweep Dodgers, 7-3 and 5-4
1948 Dodgers split with Pirates, 14-2 and 8-10
1949 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 8-7
1950 Dodgers beat Braves, 6-4
1951 Dodgers beat Braves, 12-6
1952 Dodgers beat Phillies, 4-3
1953 Dodgers beat Phillies, 5-0
1954 Dodgers beat Phillies, 2-1
1955 Dodgers beat Phillies, 9-8
1956 - Dodgers beat Giants, 6-4
1957 - Dodgers beat Giants, 5-0
1958 Didn't play
1959 Dodgers beat Giants, 3-2
1960 Phillies beat Dodgers, 4-2
(Dodgers streak of 10 straight Mother's Day wins ends)
1961 Cubs beat Dodgers, 10-8
1962 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 4-3
1963 Dodgers beat Giants, 6-5
1964 Dodgers beat Giants, 9-1
1965 Giants beat Dodgers, 6-3
1966 Reds beat Dodgers, 2-1
1967 Dodgers split with Cubs, 2-1 and 3-6
1968 Dodgers beat Braves, 1-0
1969 Didn't play
1970 Dodgers beat Phillies, 7-0
1971 Pirates beat Dodgers, 11-5
1972 Didn't play
1973 Dodgers beat Giants, 15-3
1974 Dodgers beat Padres, 15-9 in 13 innings
1975 Dodgers beat Pirates, 7-0
1976 Phillies beat Dodgers, 10-3
1977 Didn't play
1978 Cubs beat Dodgers, 10-7 in 15 innings (Tommy Lasorda is not happy with Dave Kingman's performance this day)
1979 Dodgers beat Expos, 8-2
1980 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 4-2
1981 Dodgers beat Mets, 5-3
1982 Dodgers beat Expos, 5-4
1983 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 6-4
1984 Dodgers beat Mets, 5-3
1985 Dodgers beat Pirates, 2-0
1986 Expos beat Dodgers, 4-3
1987 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 8-7
1988 Dodgers beat Cardinals, 12-6
1989 Dodgers beat Phillies, 9-0
1990 Didn't play
1991 Phillies beat Dodgers, 7-3
1992 Mets beat Dodgers, 3-0
1993 Dodgers beat Giants, 6-4
1994 Giants beat Dodgers, 5-4
1995 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 6-5 in 11 innings
1996 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 6-5
1997 Expos beat Dodgers, 6-3 in 10 innings
1998 Dodgers beat Marlins, 4-2
1999 Marlins beat Dodgers, 6-4
2000 Cardinals beat Dodgers, 12-10
2001 Dodgers beat Braves, 3-1
2002 Marlins beat Dodgers, 11-3
2003 Dodgers beat Expos, 4-3
2004 Dodgers beat Pirates, 9-7 in 14 innings
(Where were you when Olmedo Saenz hit his dramatic pinch hit homer in the 14th?)
I've only been going to Dodger games since 1997, becuase I didn't realize that I was interested until a friend gave me his copy of the Ken Burns "Baseball" documentary companion book. For some reason, that hooked me.
For about 3 years now, I've been a season ticket holder (section 52, front row.) I was excited when I learned that Depo was Beane's number cruncher/ right hand guy, and was being hired as the GM.
Anyway, try and excuse my ignorant comments, and I'll try to keep them to a minimum. This site is the best, and John W. is a giant among men for giving us this place to see so many great insights on what is going on with the Dodgers. It sure beats the thousands of ignorant, whiny sites by a long shot.
PS In my post yesterday, I meant that the Dodgers should stage "Miltdown" night when Bradley starts acting up again!
Unless you start telling us that you love Joe Morgan and Bill Plaschke.
Then we will cast you out!
Again, I don't like saying that.
-----------------------------------------------
TODAY'S FACT OF CHOI, SB'S FAVORITE PLAYER, 2005:
( Very long )
Through the age of 25, the most comparable player to HSC is Brian Hunter. The third most comparable is Sid Bream. We know who these guys are.
The second most comparable is Carroll Wayne "Footsie" Belardi. On a lark, I tried to find out more about him in the world according to Google.
Belardi was born in St. Helena, CA. While he looked for all the world like a guy born to play in New Yorkwhich he would eventually do (http://tinyurl.com/dqg3m) Belardi was Northern California to the core. He went to college at Santa Clara but was not there long. Like Choi, he was left-handed, he was big and he had power. Such qualities did not go unnoticed by professional baseball. The bonus baby rule was in earnest and after barely a year of college play, he signed with Brooklyn.
Remember, this was 1950before bonus babies were required to be on the major league roster. The Dodgers sent him 3000 miles away to Nashua, NH of the New England League. He was there for one year before being called up for a cup of coffee in 1950 (ten games). He apparently picked up the name "footsie" after a rough trip around the bases.
In 1951, the Mobile Bears, with Wayne Belardi at first base, visited Chattanooga. In a 28-7 romp, Belardi hit two homeruns including a grand slam while going 4-7 with 10 RBI's. That got him called up for a glass of water (3 games). 1952 he spent in the minors. 1953 was a different story.
What a year 1953 was for Jackie's boys. Offensively, everything broke right. As a team, Brooklyn slugged .474 while hitting a then record 208 homers. It's easy to forget they were actually in a pennant race. In mid-July, the Braves were breathing down their necks, three games back. The Dodgers had lost 5 of ten including a 20-6 shellacking at the hands of the hated Giants. Then came a four game set with the Cardinals.
Game one, Gil Hodges hit a grand slam. The next day, Billy Cox did the same thing. Still, the Braves kept pace. The following day, the Dodgers were down 6-4 in the eighth but had the bases loaded when up stepped Belardi who had entered the game as a sub. To the delight of the Ebbets Field crowd, he hit the teams third grand slam in as many days. Belardi scored again in the inning as the Dodgers batted around which led to a 14-6 laugher. The Bums played lights out for the next two months, winning 43 of their next 54 and waltzed to the pennant. Winners of 105 games, they would certainly be considered one of the best teams ever but for losing the World Series to the Evil Empire.
Wayne Belardi was 22-years. He had slugged 11 homers in 69 games. He could not have been blamed if he thought his career was just getting started. Three years later, he out of the major leagues for good.
Two months into 1954, Belardi was traded to Detroit for three players and cash. Walt Dropo was having an awful season and the Tigers perhaps thought it was time for a platoon. Unfortunately, Belardi was just as bad. The two combined for an OPS just barely over .700. The Tigers finished 68-86, a mere 43 games back of the Indians.
In 1955, Belardi appeared in all of three games. I could find no report of injury. Now, I have no evidence that there was an organizational edict for players to draw walks but in 1954, Belardi's first year in Detroit, the team OBP was .322. In '55, that jumped up to .346 as the Tigers led the league in runs scored. They also won ten more games. Belardi may very well have been sent down to work on his plate discipline.
In 1956, the Tigers were an OBP machine. Six regulars had OBP's over .380, including first baseman Earl Torgeson (.406). The Tigers as a team had an OBP of .356, second in the league. Wayne Belardi was back with the big club, appearing in 79 games and setting a career high in OBP (.371). That's not bad for a 25-year old kid. But he never played another major league game.
In December, Belalrdi was traded to the Kansas City A's in an otherwise forgettable transaction. Two months after later, he was involved in a deal that no Yankee hater will forget anytime soon.
Kansas City traded Belardi, Bobby Shantz and others, including a player to be named later (remember this) for not a whole lot. The trade raised eyebrows at the time and outrage in June when the player-to-be-named was none other than Clete Boyer. The A's later admitted they had signed Boyer in '55 as a bonus baby at the behest of the Yankees so he could later be traded to the Big Apple. Yes, there was howling. No, nothing was done. Shantz had the lowest ERA of any Yankee starter that year and Boyer was a fixture at 3b for many a season. Mike in one of his baseball rants called it the most lopsided trade ever between the A's and the Yankees. He's got a nice breakdown of it here: http://tinyurl.com/96vhh
Meanwhile, poor Belardi at 25 was finished as a major league player. The only other baseball reference to Belardi I could find has to do with the New Orleans Pelicans. Winners of ten pennants between 1901 and 1943, the Pelicans had fallen on hard times. By 1957, with television taking over the public's attention span, the team was dying. Just 941 fans showed up for the last game at Heinemann Field to watch the cellar-dwelling home squad lose its last game. Belardi was at first base.
He died in Santa Cruz in 1993. The most comparable player to Belardi through the age of 25 is Hee-Seop Choi.
FOOTNOTE: Some of the charming conversation you'll find at baseball-fever.com (they've got a Brooklyn chat room) involves people who actually saw the man play. The claim there is that Belardi had a sweet swing and just didn't get the breaks. But Belardi never OPS'd .800 and never fielded .990 at his position. I don't think it was bad breaks that did in Belardi. I suspect he just wasn't that good.
Thanks to baseball-reference.com, Hardball Times, Mike's baseball rants, Retrosheet, Buddy Stall.
Sorry about the profanity, but I'm quoting here.
I am the king of pointless pursuits! Remember, there can only be one DT version of Cliff Claven and that person is me!!
(cue the Vincent Price laugh)
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!
Since the move to L.A., it's been about a 50/50 split.
If the DBacks drop 3 of 4 at home to Pittsburgh could this indicate that maybe they were playing a bit over their head?
The Pirates lead the DBacks 2-1 in the 6th.
"Let's put this the simplest way possible without resorting to foul language.
Imagine Carl Lindner taking $25.5 million in cash out of his bank account. After defecating on the money, Lindner proceeds to strangle the Filipino hooker that witnessed his currency defoulment in full view of a group of tourists with video cameras, Lindner then charges into a police station brandishing an empty shotgun. On top of this, he admits that he picked Sam Bowie in the NBA draft, pre-empted the Raiders/Jets game with Heidi, and advised Neville Chamberlain in the late 30's.
Uncle Carl is likely to get a better return on his investment under the set of conditions laid out in the previous paragraph than from his investment in Eric Milton, who's as overrated as Eric Gregg is fat."
Only mention this because the airlines pretty much have stripped down budgets these days.
You have now ensured a 3-hit shutout by Eric Milton.
Will I ever learn anything about this game??
How many relievers for the Giants today?
AZ-PIT are only in the 5th.
Rather than comment on the game itself, I am restricting my creative energies to lengthy posts about obscure players remotely comparable to Hee-Seop Choi.
See? I'm not wasting my life.
Have a look at this:
http://www.baseballhalloffame.org/exhibits/online%5Fexhibits/dressed%5Fto%5Fthe%5Fnines/timeline.htm
Many airlines are not hiring right now, as you said. The few that are generally hold open-call interview sessions to find new people, whom they subsequently send to training upon hiring.
The problem with these open-calls is that you have to go to them, sometimes they are far away, and the selection process seems pretty random. I've been to two so far: at one I was turned away for being taller than 5'8" (Dwarf Air); at the other I didn't make it through the group interview round (not sure why).
I've heard of a couple JC programs in Southern California like you describe, but so far that hasn't been something my schedule would allow me to participate in. Basically, I'm trying to go the hire-me-and-train-me route.
I'm aware that the airline industry is hurting right now, but I'm currently in education, which is about as bad as it can get, anyway.
Scott Podsednik = Enemy of the People.
What's the story?
Icaros, whatcha doin' in eddication? I'm starting grad school in the fall with the goal of getting a teaching credential. I'm looking to teach English where my first assignment will be, "Pick a random, obsure ballplayer, preferably one comparable to Hee-Seop Choi. We're going to do a little research, kids..."
Izzy, SS
Repko, RF
Bradley, CF
Kent, 2B
Saenz, 1B
Phillips, C
Ledee, LF
Edwards, 3B
Weaver, P
Looks like they're be giving Edwards a chance to show what he can do. If he can do a decent job, Perez' return = sayonara, Nori.
According to the lineups just posted on Yahoo, Saenz is starting tonight...at first. Drew and Choi are both sitting. Against Eric Milton. I am going to hang myself from a lamp post. Drew I can understand with four coming up against St. Louis. But Choi? Didn't he get a bunch of days off when Tracy was playing Grabowski there earlier in the season? Did Choi break a leg or something, because that's the only reason any of this makes sense.
But at least Repko's in right and not you know who.
Thanks, that's a great site. Oh, how I long for the days when ballplayers wore bow ties. I'm sorry I'm going to miss Joe Morgan's lyrical insight but I'm on my way to a wonderous place called The Valley for a Mother's Day dinner at Vitello's, Robert Blake's favorite restaurant. Enjoy the game all and let's hope the Cards got all their run production for the week today. That's the name of that tune.
WWSH
I agree with 101. Yes, Saenz saws southpaws in half but as Jon pointed out awhile back, strict platoons bring everything back to the mean--including Saenz' gaudy numbers against lefties.
Choi is red hot. I think he should've gotten the start today.
Joe's argument would be a lot stronger of any of those three multi-million dollar guys were hitting better than .260 thus far.
Robinson pulled Carrasco. PH got a single and Wilkerson struck out. Not an obvious right answer here, but I think I would have left him, hoped he throw BBs for the next inning, and started the top of the tenth with my leadoff hitter and no hits. Other views?
Bottom 9, tied 3-3. Niekro on second base, one out.
"Deivi Cruz lines into unassisted double play, right fielder Jose Guillen. Lance Niekro doubled off 2nd."
This can't be good.
Choi's starting against a lefty. Good news.
Did anyone see that double play? Did Guillen run to second before Niekro got back? Do I not know what "unassisted" means in this context?
Steve?
Niekro was completely fooled on the play. It was a shallow fly ball to right and by the time Guillen caught it, Niekro was standing on third. Guillen could have easily thrown it to second for the out, but since he had to run towards second anyways to get back to the dugout, he just touched second for the third out while Niekro was standing on third dumbfounded.
I mean call me naive, but would Jim Tracy do that? I think he wouldn't.
And the Giants, predictably, get out of the inning. I just don't understand why fans put up with this nonsense, much less openly promote it, like Tim Brown and his Angels.
Grins. Don't waver, Icaros!
Forever, my scorebook will be wrong!
Pull the trigger, Jose. We're behind you!
That bunt was so wrong. I'm furious and I don't even know more than two guys in their starting rotation.
And how about a four pitch walk to leadoff hitter Cristian Guzman? That Giant bullpen is a real treasure.
As the head coach said after the game, Cal wasn't going to win with conventional means, so they had to be unconventional. Do you think the baseball MSM would have approved? ;-)
In other news, F-Rob leaves his pitcher in to hit with 2 outs in the top 11th, after a double play after not sac bunting the runner to 2nd. An inning or so after bunting a runner to third.
To quote Guinness brewing company, "Brilliant!"
That must be a Dodger Thoughts record.
It makes sense to give Drew a day off though.
Probably a good time to play hit and run to stay out of the DP.
http://tinyurl.com/dxjrl
I'll be interested to see if either of the "combatants" receive any chin music tonight.
jeongers, I don't know why you take your hottest hitter out of hte lineup against a guy prone to giving up the longball. Choi should be in there, IMHO.
Wouldn't want his play by play duties to interfere with his job shilling for the ESPN empire.
Am I the only one who doesn't understand how Boomer Berman, and his tired 80's schtick continues to prosper on the World's Sports Leader. It's 2005, no one needs Pat Benatar or Hall and Oates references anymore, and no one under 45 understands them!
Kent: "Yo la tengo! Yo la tengo!"
I feel old.
Next thing you know, his dream of getting the rest of the starting lineup of the 76 Reds elected to Cooperstown is in sight. Pack your bags for the Hall of Fame, Dan Driessen and Cesar Geronimo.
I can't believe Choi is not in the lineup and Mike Edwards is.
I really dislike tonight's lineup. No Choi, no Drew, and Olmedo's do for regression to the mean. I was surprised to see Ledee still OPSing 859, but he just doesn't inspire any real confidence. The same goes for Repko, despite his flashes of power. I just hope Bradley really gets it going tonight.
WWSH
I agree with the sentiment, but in Tracy's mind, Edwards is in there instead of Nakamura. Playing Choi was not an option. In that world, I can't complain.
Rusty Kuntz.
WWSH
Arghhhh
WWSH
Yep. Now I'm convinced.
WWSH
I'm going to go back to grading exams. Less than a full exam left, thank heavens. End of break....
WWSH
In last Wednesday's game against the Nationals, the Dodgers had six Olneys. The Nationals had one. And yet the Dodgers lost!
May 19, 2004 against Tim Redding (then of Houston).
There was an ITP HR in Florida today by Barmes.
1) it's the wrong park
2) it will likely be cold tomorrow night
Who gave up Choi's first homer in the majors?
GSfRB: Watch me.
(Heads bangs against table)
(Slumps into unconsciousness)
WOO HOO!
If only for the problem that he's never hit a triple in the majors.
Henceforth, at the first sign of Weaver struggling, go to the bullpen.
Sincerely,
Every Dodger fan
The only way Phillips gets a triple is if he hits another one out, but he's so slow going around the bases that the umps stop him at 3rd. Or he runs out of gas there, and just stops voluntarily.
Hmm, maybe Weaver DIDN'T like Junior's long look at the last HR.
Of coure he's pitching to Dunn.
pull
He walks a TON.
In each case, both men had their season high in RBI in year which they didn't have a sac fly.
Weaver wriggles out of it. He made the last out in the last inning - does he come out for another inning (he probably shouldn't, but will he)? 91 pitches so far. I say he comes out to pitch (prediction, not hope) if the offense adds a run or more, otherwise Tracy replaces him.
Weaver gets out of it. Randa is human. Why are the Reds playing Aurilia? They have to have someone better than that waste of lineup space.
If I don't love you baby-
Grits ain't groceries,
Eggs ain't poultry,
And Mona Lisa was a ma-a-a-an.
The Dodgers aren't scheduled for a 5:05 Sunday home game this year as far as I can tell. On July 3 the game will start at 7:10 for fireworks purposes.
The Memorial Day game against the Cubs will be at 5:05.
Repko is now dead to me. If you can't go up there confident that you can beat the hell out of Eric Milton, you have no business in the big leagues. Back to AAA, Busher.
It must be Wunschtime.
Who's hungry from some Wunsch?
C'mon, Steve, does he really deserve the "Fredo" treatment?
If your teammates can cycle the lineup enough.
And maybe Bill Plummer.
Ricky Stone just saw his career flash before his eyes.
You know, J.D. Drew is on the bench too.
And he sent in...Grabowski.
Have I mentioned my feelings regarding Jim Tracy around here?
You never have enough runs, and Tracy just gave two away.
http://www.barefootsworld.net/sounds/calliop1.mid
Nice play by Repko out there.
Tracy is trying to make it up to me by having Braz pitch the ninth. Too little too late.
Maximizing Choi, Saenz, Ledee, and even Bako (20 points higher than career average so far) deserves some mention.
Ummm...OK, Joe.
That was nice of them to cut the throw so that Kent didn't get his uniform dirty.
choi time
"Dude, he wouldn't throw me a fastball, he was scared. I would have hit him but he just threw this weak junk."
470!
A horrific performance by Morgan and Miller. They were literally all over the place--talking about this, that and the other. Ever since these two started, Miller has been deferential to Morgan and I think at great cost to his craft.
It's been awhile since I've heard an entire broadcast from these two and lord willing, it'll be a while longer.
Well, at least until Wednesday when ESPN televises the Dodgers-Cardinals.
Look, when you call a baseball game, you gotta fill the time. Everyone knows that. You know what Vin Scully does? He reads the media guide better than anyone. Make it a point to notice the next time he's on the air. Scully is able to "kill" a lot of time by describing each player during his first at-bat. If there's an anecdote about a player in the guide, Scully will turn it into a story whereas 90% of the announcers out there would just read it verbatim. Additionally, because he's talking about the players who are in that moment competing, he's into the game. Scully is about 60-40 split storytelling to game detail. I'd prefer 50-50 but only when I'm insanely picky. I'd rather take Scully over anyone.
Now, Morgan and Miller are talking about anything *but*the game. I posted earlier that there was a crucial moment and they decided to get into the infield fly rule. I think they revisted the IF rule three separate times tonight. Everybody and their mother knew the play in question wasn't an IF but there they went, on and on and on. It's crazy making--Pete Rose for the HOF? Jeongers hit it right on the head--either tackle the issue or don't. Miller seemed unsure of the ground he was treading on and I'm frankly at a loss as to why.
471 - I'm sure they did get a chuckle out of it. But remember that post you had back in February about Plaschke and how he caters to groupthink? The current CW is Brown is a jerk and done as a pitcher. If Brown starts pitching great (perish the thought!), they'll turn the other way.
Miller was thought to be a great local announcer in his day. I have never heard him without Joe Morgan by his side. I have to believe that without the current Emmy winner for best analyst in any sport as a partner, Jon Miller is a much more incisive and comfortable man to listen to than he was tonight.
When Dunn came up (gosh, I can't remember the inning) with a runner on 3rd, ESPN kept going on and on about how he hasn't had a SAC fly since June of 2002 or something like that.
While it was an interesting tidbit, it really didn't tell us anything. I wish they would have said,
"Well yeah, he hasn't hit a lot of SAC flies lately, but he has blah blah RBIs in a sacrifice situation and a blah blah batting average"
If I wanted to look for the data I could probably find it. The info is pretty worthless (other than good watercooler kind of talk) without the whole picture being painted. I still don't know how good of a hitter Dunn is with runners on 3rd.
http://tinyurl.com/dvkrl
Let's see if DePo can trade him for Oliver Perez.
I only hope you are referring to Grabs... otherwise, I'm at a loss...
Last night I hope I had my final look at "Grabowski-stares-in-disbelief-on-called-strike-three"TM (even though it was a ball).
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.