Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Date/Pitches | 6/1 | 6/2 | 6/3 | 6/4 | 6/5 | 6/6 | 6/7 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lowe | 100 | - | - | - | - | 90 | - | 95* |
Thompson | - | 89 | - | - | - | - | 86 | 88* |
Weaver | - | - | 120 | - | - | - | - | 120 |
Houlton | - | - | - | 74 | - | - | - | 74 |
Penny | - | - | - | - | 108 | - | - | 108 |
Gagne | - | 27 | - | 18 | - | 12 | - | 57 |
Brazoban | - | 19 | 13 | 14 | - | - | - | 46 |
Wunsch | 4 | - | 3 | 4 | - | - | - | 11 |
Sanchez | 32 | - | 7 | 21 | 29 | - | 22 | 111 |
Carrara | 12 | 25 | 11 | - | 30 | - | 29 | 107 |
Erickson | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 | 15 |
Osoria | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | 5 | 5 |
In pursuit of this goal, secondary relievers Duaner Sanchez and Giovanni Carrara have thrown more than twice as many pitches this month as elite relievers Yhency Brazoban and Eric Gagne. Even before Tuesday's game, Sanchez and Carrara had thrown 50 percent more pitches than Brazoban and Gagne.
Kelly Wunsch, who most feel is a better reliever than Carrara, has thrown the least during this time. Wunsch does lead the pitching staff in overall appearances this season, however, so perhaps he has earned some rest. Less relevantly, he is considered a specialist against lefties and generally saved for those opponents.
The Dodgers can get better use out of their bullpen rather easily first by not wasting a roster spot on Scott Erickson, second if Franquelis Osoria proves to be the real deal, third if they get some help back from the disabled list, fourth and most important - by balancing the reliever workload.
I understand that the Dodgers don't want to burn out Brazoban and Gagne before September. But there isn't going to be a September, so to speak, if the middle relievers' arms fall off.
This is not a shot at Sanchez, who is just on the good side of mediocre but nevertheless has been one of the better relievers on the staff this season. He's entitled to the kind of bad outing he had Tuesday.
The point is, it's one thing to use the secondary relievers to balance out the bullpen workload. It's another thing to give the secondary relievers way more than their share. That's like having your kids watch a fifth hour of TV because you fear they've been reading too much. However tempting, it's not the way to go.
The Dodgers could have easily used Osoria, Wunsch, Brazoban, and Gagne to get through the final four innings of the game. And then, if someone gets in trouble or it goes extra innings, they could have turned to Sanchez and Carrara. (We won't spend much more time talking about Erickson, whose appearance Tuesday can only be justified as some sort of Salem Pitch Hunt.)
The Dodgers had a lead in the sixth inning Tuesday, but worked from the back of their bullpen instead of the front and lost that lead. The top relievers will certainly be rested for tonight's game but tonight's game could be a blowout loss, more appropriate for the secondary relievers. If it's not a blowout loss, then that leaves you in a situation no different from Tuesday's game, except for the fact that guys like Sanchez and Carrara would be pitching with another day of rest and a likely Tuesday victory in the team's back pocket.
It does not make sense to save rested elite relief pitchers for another day. Don't overwork Gagne and Brazoban. Don't underwork them either.
* * *
Oh, and by the way - the Dodgers have only four games in the next six days. They do not need 12 pitchers. They don't they don't they don't. Bring up a bench player, however temporary, and make the oh-so-inevitable Erickson excision now. Or heck, put him on the disabled list with "tenderness" if you can't bear to let him go. But now is the time.
Great job, Jon.
I would think with Erickson, not only is he bad, but when you use him infrequently, he probably is worse.
I'm not trying to apologize for JT's decisions, but to me, the resulting chart says "put in Erickson and hope he can get 3 outs in the sixth, then put in Carrara/Wunsch and hope he gets 3 outs in the seventh, then Yhency in the eighth, and Gagne in the ninth." Things just didn't go according to plan.
It can't feel that great to watch another teamate be pursued by management while they basically ignore you.
I don't think it's necessarily a problem of underworking Brazoban and Gagne, I just think that the guys who are supposed to get the ball to G(h)ame Over really, really suck as of late. And I mean all of them. Wunsch's last 7 day WHIP has been horrible.
There's a middle ground between running someone into the ground, and using them extensively yet effectively.
This is more than likely the decision of Boras and not Dodger management. Boras very much likes to test the FA market with his clients and doesn't really like to negotiate extensions. Penny's entension is all but signed (3 years / 26 m). Whos would risk giving Weaver anything at this point anyway? (And I'm sure Boras knows this)
If Weaver gets an extension, restraining orders will be in order. Me from him, and him from the Dodgers.
As far as Wunsch's 7-day WHIP, he's faced 3 batters, gotten 2 outs and allowed 1 single, which subsequently scored when Carrara gave up the 3-run blast to Hall (a WHIP of 1.50). If you extend the range to 8 days, his WHIP goes down to 1.00. Either way, 3 or 4 batters seems like a small number to be evaluating.
Why wait for one of the injured players to come back before dumping Erickson? Why not release him in favor of a Cody Ross-type?
"Him" in 21 means DePodesta, not Weaver. Weaver is just another loaded gun left on the table.
Joel Hanrahan RHP in Jacksonville
Edwin Jackson RHP in Las Vegas
Ryan Ketchner LHP (hasn't pitched this year)
Steve Schmoll RHP in Last Vegas
Russell Martin RH-C in Jacksonville
Dioner Navarro S-C in Las Vegas
Willy Aybar S-2B/3B in Las Vegas
Delwyn Young S-2B/DH in Jacksonville
Cody Ross R-OF in Las Vegas
Any of them could contribute by eliminating Erickson from the roster. Unfortunately, by virtue of being on the roster, it means that Tracy would play them (either in important pitching situations or batting 2nd in the lineup). Thus, I think Cody Ross would probably be the best call, since he would be behind Scrappy in the depth chart. Schmoll might also be alright, though he hasn't been pitching that well for Las Vegas.
1) The Dodgers are unable to trade for a starting pitcher, or the one they trade for is not signed beyond this season.
2) Weaver pitches well for the remainder of the season.
3) The Dodgers are not able to obtain anyone better in the offseason, which may not be a stretch considering the projected pitching market is extremely poor.
Certainly, if he does get resigned, it would be for significantly less than he's playing for now. Additionally, I don't think there's any chance we'd resign him before the offseason.
DePodesta, I'm going to start calling you "Harvard Boy" if you can't get your head out of your #.
Or, worst case scenario, Weaver gets knocked out in the top of the fourth. Who do you throw up there for long relief, to go 4-5-6?
The answer to this question can be found in the wisdom of the movie "Speed".
In your scenario, I would just shoot the hostage.
If so, the Dodgers can afford to skip the 5th slot the next time or two, making Houlton available.
I think, also, Houlton was being volunteered in #38 as being worst case scenario.
Dodgers get: P- Roy Oswalt
SS- Adam Everett
Astros get: SS- Cesar Izturis
3b- Joel Guzman
1b- James Loney (houston native)
C- Russell Martin
I dont want to include the catcher, but I think we'd have to inclue 2 "A" prospects along with Izturis to get Oswalt.
Thoughts?
I feel 47 would make the short list of worst trades in franchise history.
In all seriousness, I think it's extremely imbalanced towards the Astros. Izturis may already be the best SS in the NL, and he's only 25 years old. Additionally, he's signed through 2008 at 2.35 (2005), 3.10 (2006), 4.15 (2007), and a 5.40 (2008 option). Roy Oswalt is approaching free agency after 2006 and is signed at 11 million for next year. While I'd like to have an ace starter, I think all things considered Izturis is the more valuable of the two.
Adam Everett at 28 is basically a replacement level shortstop who likely peaked last year. The good news is he's still under arbitration for a couple more years, but Antonio Perez could very well outperform him at a lower price.
Joel Guzman is one of the top 10 prospects in the game. He's garnered comparisons to Miguel Cabrera and Juan Gonzalez. Russell Martin is a great defensive catcher who looks to be developing some power to go along with his outstanding batting eye. James Loney is slumping, but still has a lot of potential considering he's only 21 years old.
"A manager uses a relief pitcher like a six shooter, he fires until it's empty then takes the gun and throws it at the villan."
-Dan Quisenberry-
Joel Hanrahan.
http://www.startlearningnow.com/CHOI-FM.htm
I picture Felipe Alou trying this right now.
But he's more like a guy who has a bunch of pop guns that shoot small caliber bullets and he's hoping that he finally hits somebody in the heart.
I think there's a lot of experimentation going on here, figuring out who fits in and where. I don't mind the Dodgers dropping a game like last night, especially when Erickson didn't actually lose the game. Blow the lead, yes, but there was still baseball to be played and they were still in it.
But why not give an experienced pitcher the chance to see if he has anything left at all? Alvarez moved the bullpen successfully. Gagne benefitted from not having to pace himself through 6 innings. Lima reestablished himself out of the bullpen. It's not inconceivable that Erickson could be useful as a reliever if he has the stuff but not the stamina.
P.S. James Loney has been slumping for about three years now, hasn't he? I don't think it's a slump anymore.
I just think that true #1 aces are so few, that it would take a strong package to get him. I'm of the belief you have to play to win right now and the near future. I dont worry about 2007.
Oswalt, Penny, Lowe, Perez in the rotation doesnt look bad.
Everett would be sort of like a real cheap Charles Johnson type replacement.. Similar to the Loduca trade last year.
Trading a heart and soul guy for a #1 pitcher is a good trade in my book.
"Put him on hold. I'm talking to Bret Saberhagen right now. And please get Scott Radinsky's agent's number."
Dessens- Erickson gone
Perez - ???
Alveraz - ???
I blame all of this on Depo for letting Erickson win a spot on the opening day roster. None of us were fooled by his small spring sample size, why was he. If we lose the pennant by one or two games we will look back at all the games that Erickson started and wonder very loud "why". The only reason to have DJ Houlton on this staff is to pitch. If he can't pitch then he should be let go or make a deal with Houston so you can send him to the minors. We are not the KC Royals and we have no business keeping a rule 5 pitcher on our roster unless he has value in the current season.
I think a deal of
Billingsly/Looney/Martin or Navarro/Osario might be enticing.
Oswalt could be a Cy Young candidate in Los Angeles. The future is now and we have plenty from where those 4 came from. Looney is still considered a top prospect. Remember he was a high schooler not a college player so he is still young. We just got excited because of his 2004 spring but he's 21 and in AA and each week he seems to be getting a little better. Would hate to lose any of those 4 but to get a stud like Oswalt you have to give up something. Think along the lines of what the Expo's gave up for Colon several years ago. 3 A type minor league players(Cliff Lee, Grady Sizemore,Brandon Philips). Only one has panned out so far and he still has a long way to go. At the time the trade was made Brandon Philips was considered the best infield prospect in baseball. 3 years later he still in AAA. I'll take the sure thing.
Tracy has to figure on needing four innings of relief in about half the games. Prior to this year, he only had to figure on filling three innngs, and we had three rock-solid guys who could come in the 7th, the 8th and then the 9th to hold onto a close win. Now we have two pretty solid guys for the 8th and 9th, but a series of crapshoots to fill the other two innings. It doesn't matter which innings. We're two short, no matter how you look at it.
The reason Yhency and Gagne aren't getting the numbers of innings-pitched is because, too many times, either the starter (Weaver) has blown open the game early and we couldn't catch up, or a mid-reliever has screwed up. In such games, it's pointless to pitch Gagne or Yhency, other than "to get in some work."
Rather than sacrificing Guzman or Izturis to get a #1 starter, what we really need are two upgrades in the pen, a 6th inning guy to replace Duaner/Alvarez and a 7th inning guy to replace Gio.
| Why not just get a couple dozen baseballs instead of Everett?
Hey I think i'm worth more than a bag full of baseballs... not on a baseball field, but..
We thought this was true already!
Here's what I wrote on June 5:
But let's try this another way. You have Erickson and Carrara. Both of them have no business pitching to major league hitters. Well, Tracy's already figured that out about Erickson. We haven't seen him in forever. So DFA'ing Erickson does nothing. But DFA'ing Carrra ensures that he won't pitch in tie games. Win-win. Both problems taken care of.
But there he was, again(!), pitching in a two-run game! Assume, hypothetically, that Tracy is an idiot (humor me). You give him Erickson. What does he do? He uses him! That's what he does. Give a child a steak knife. What does he do? He uses it!
It is clear that the only way we will be free of Erickson is to release him. Grabowski was "gone"; now he's back. Hookers with crack. DePodesta and Tracy with low-talent nobodies. Same thing. Only solution is cold turkey.
And Scotty, quit breathing, your wasting good oxygen other players could use. Maybe you could be our new batboy or something.
I think Farnsworth gets a bad rap. He's always put up big strikeout numbers, but is known more for his failures (kinda like Armando Benitez).
Reply: Why would you keep someone on your roster who has such little value?
vr, Xei
Parting with Urbina would be tapping into a strength, and dropping salary. According to ESPN he's making 4M, get the Tigers to pay 2M of that and take 2 decent prospects and there you go. That's a good idea, and you can never have enough Venezuelans on a team.
Again, I think his reputation might precede him.
I believe he is no longer arby-elig, so he might be a FA this year?
Cash or prospects - which is more important?
That's the really small picture. The bigger picture speaks to the question of trades. Everyone here seems focused on fixing this year's problems (many created by injuries, others by sheer suckitude). But I wonder if DePo isn't actually on a 3 year plan (the expansion of Beane's 3-quarter plan). Maybe this whole season is to "see what we have" and patch up holes with spare parts while waiting for the kids to be MLB ready. In that view, trading prospects for the stretch drive would be a bad idea.
This is how I think about it too. At the start of teh season, I figured that if everyone was healthy, then the Dodgers could win the West without burning prospects, and still be ready to replace the veterans with kids in the next couple years. I figured SD would be the main rival. But under no circumstance did I look at the 2005 roster and think this was a pennant contender this year. Not with StL so loaded. As things have worked out so far, injuries have left us a few games back of SD. The West is still winnable without major changes, but I don't even think that major changes would get us over the next hump, the pennant.
So while I agree that Erickson should be given his release, I'd otherwise make the best of this season with non-prospect AAA callups (including guys like Mahomes), and hope that the injury bug leaves the team alone for a while. The Dodgers could STILL win the division that way. But I wouldn't do anything that mortgages the future in the vain hope that "this could be the year."
Basically, I trust him.
It's unfortunate that both our swing-men, Alvarez and Dessens, are injured. They are ideally the guys DePodesta put on the roster to deal with this type of situation. Hopefully, in another week or so, they'll be able to successfully resume their roles. It will also be nice to get Perez back, as he can usually be counted on for a quality 6 innings.
Injuries are primarily what's killing us, but bullpen management isn't helping.
There seems to be many more bullpen arms out there. After watching last night, the bullpen needs help. I'd take:
Gagne
Brazoban
New guy (Urbina, Farnsworth, etc.)
Wunsch
Sanchez
With Alvarez, Dessens, and Carrara being able to contribute 2 healthy bodies the rest of the way to fill out the rest of the spots.
SD 15-Day: 2 (Redding & Loretta)
SD 60-Day: 3 (Ascencio, Guzman, & Young)
AZ 15-Day: 2 (Lyon & Aquino)
AZ 60-Day: 2 (Villareal & Gil)
LA 15-Day: 6 (Alvarez, Dessens, Bako, Bradley, & Ledee)
LA 60-Day: 2 (Dreifort & Valentin)
SF 15-Day: 0
SF 60-Day: 2 (Bonds & Benitez)
CO 15-Day: 4 (Acevedo, Shacon, Greene, & Miles)
CO 60-Day: 4 (Cook, Merricks, Tsao, & Barmes)
So, Colorado is really the only team that is as beat up as we are.
OT, I just noticed that the Rockies are pulling a Thompson with Merricks. He's a Rule-5 draftee from the Dodgers and it looks like they're just going to keep him on the disabled list for the year.
Sure, five above-average starters would be excellent. But my sense is the price for two more starters of that quality level would be much higher than it would be for one or two middle relievers. Whatever mortgaging of the future would be involved in replacing Sanchez and/or Carrara, the payments would be a lot lower than they would be to replace Jeff Weaver, Odalis Perez, Derek Thompson or D.J. Houlton in the rotation.
Not to say that a big-market team needs to emulate a small-market team, or that the Dodgers can't improve on the model. But to not credit Beane for keeping the A's in the hunt despite their tiny payroll is absurd. The question isn't why the A's suck this year - it's why didn't they suck for each of the last 10 years! And no, 3 pitchers (actually 2, since Zito was only great once) are not the end of the answer. Look at all the talent Oakland has had to part with once it became expensive. That they GOT that talent was partly good luck, but also partly smart management. That they lost it was almost always because of finances.
And now Jason Schmidt is more like jason schmidt too.
If your ace is Brett Tomko, then you're living in a land where Jeff Weaver is a demigod.
Then again, Phillies fans are always unhappy.
Eddie Guardado (1.64 ERA; 0.864 WHIP; very good, but an injury risk)
Danys Baez (2.39 ERA; 1.291 WHIP; above average, but his low ERA is masking his high WHIP)
Bob Wickman (3.60 ERA; 1.400 WHIP; he's old, injury-proned, and not very good)
Jose Mesa (4.22 ERA; 1.594 WHIP; he's older and worse)
I don't think it's worth paying what it would take to get Guardado or Baez and I have no desire to have Wickman or Mesa anywhere near our team.
#59, etc, why can't we just BUY Oswalt, or hell even Urbina, although I'm not sure I buy that. I keep thinking the Dodgers ought to have some Cash available.
#66 That is too true. :-)
I'd still like to have a better pitcher than say Dessens/Perez since I don't have too much faith that they are going to be that great. If we had another power pitcher as discussed previously, it would help the overall rotation, and then of weaver/dessens/perez (if they aren;t traded) I think they might be able to work from the pen. Just my thinking, which has been known for flaws, so take it for what it's worth. Sort of like any of us thinking these wonderful Dodger Thoughts (tm) are bubbling in anyone's head that will actually make decisions.
Can we pick up a Capuano? How about a Buehrle? A Radke? Bedard?
Relief: Crain? Timlin? Sisco?
Serenity now! Serenity now!
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
19. Steve Saxs Sweaty Jockstrap
Scottie get the hell out, your breathing up good oxygen other players could be breathing.
2005-06-08 07:56:53
20. Jon Weisman
All right, Saxy. We get it. Enough. Tone it down, please.
2005-06-08 08:05:32
22. Steve Saxs Sweaty Jockstrap
Sorry Jon, I'm just so fed up and frustrated right now. As I'm sure everyone on this thread is. We could have picked up a game on the D-smacks and Padres last night. I'm just venting.
Thanks again Scottie
2005-06-08 13:09:20
75. Steve Saxs Sweaty Jockstrap
We need some middle relief help, fellas. Please DePo get on the phones and make some magic happen. There's no use having Yhency and Eric if we cant get to them with the lead.
And Scotty, quit breathing, your wasting good oxygen other players could use. Maybe you could be our new batboy or something.
*
It's not enough that you said the line once - you had to say it twice? Even after I asked you to tone it down and stop? Do you really think it's that good a line? I really don't appreciate this at all. This is not the site for those kinds of lines. Tone it way down.
That bumps Erickson out and Carrara into the mop-up role rather than the close-game-but-not-the-8th-inning-yet role.
One thing I liked about this board is the lack of bathroom humor.
I find myself distracted by the user-name so much so that I can't bring myself to read the content of the post. Please tone the name way down. How about just Saxy?
For years, Beane's critics have maintained that without Mulder/Hudson/Zito he was nothing. As he rebuilds over the next 3 years he will have his chance to answer his critics. It will be a very interesting time. For right now I think his Atlanta trade was a disaster and considering what he got for Hudson and the fact Hudson signed a long term deal with Atlanta it is irritating that we weren't involved. I loved the Mulder deal and think that Haren/Barton will tilt that deal in Oakland's favor. Haren's last two games have shown what he can do and he'll be cheap for several years.
I wouldn't be surprised if Detroit were to move Polanco again either. What do they need with him?
Where's the Choi love?
I'd rather have Dessens working long relief and Thompson stay in the rotation. A bullpen of
Dessens/Alveraz/Sanchez/Wunsch/Brazoban/Gagne should get it done. I think Gio's magic dust has just about been used up and would not shed a tear if he was to be released. It is possible that Wilson is done but I hope not for our sake. Anyway I see no need to trade for a setup man. Mix and match until we get something working.
79 IP
2.82 era
1.04 whip
.221 BA Against.
41ks/21walks
Shouldn't cost us too much, should it?
vr, Xei
It is from the LA Times, June 2, 1966.
Charles Maher interviewing Vin Scully (a 3-part series)
Maher asked Scully if he ever took a defeat home with him:
"I don't even take a victory home with me."
And in 1966, Scully had already been on the job for 17 years. I'm sure he has heeded that advice for the past 40 seasons.
He would be ideal for a 5th starter. He's been a goldmine on my roto team. I suspect he will be one of the most coveted pitchers that are available via trade.
117 -- that is exactly right.
Agreed that no extra set-up guy is needed. However, I just don't see Alvarez as an effective short reliver. Dessens isn't a great choice for short work, either, but his presence means that Carrara (or Erickson) doesn't have to be the default "I can't use Sanchez until the 7th inning!" 6th-inning pitcher.
Looking at the schedule, the Dodgers have a good chance to catch the Padres this month -
3 vs MIN (no Santana)
3 @ KC
3 @ CHA (many consider them overrated)
3 @ SD
3 @ ANA
3 vs SD
A long road trip, but against beatable teams. 2 series wins against the padres, all else being equal, cuts their lead in half. The Padres don't play KC, and we don't play CLE. That's a benefit to us.
Side note: It was strange watching the game last night without being able to monitor and participate in the conversations here. Dodger Thoughts is crack. I was dying to see what everyone thought of the Erickson performance!
We could snag the DFA'd Romano from the Reds as a backup...
I don't think the Dodgers have anyone who can match up well with Emeka Okafor.
2004 (AA): 3.02 ERA; 119.1 IP; 10 HR; 36 BB; 98 K
2004 (AAA): 1.29 ERA; 7.0 IP; 1 HR; 0 BB; 4 K
He's 23 years old, but he hasn't pitched this season. He had an ulnar nerve transplant surgery last fall. I don't know what the typical recovery time is for that type of injury.
We have hammered Jason Johnson in the few appearances our hitters have had against him. Hopefully this continues tonight.
And please JT, lets not see Gio, Erickson, or Robles tonight.
Charlotte is funny to think about, but CHA is one of two abbreviations used for the White Sox (CHicago, AL - versus CHicago NL, or CHN for the Cubs).
CHW, CHC, CHA, CHN, LAD, LAN, LAA, NYM, NYN, NYA, NYY - these abbreviations describe a total of 6 teams.
Fri: Penny v. Mays
Sat: Lowe v. Silva
Sun: ??
If Tracy wants to use a rookie pitcher on Sunday (Houlton or Thompson) he might choose to rest Phillips on Saturday night. Is Silva a southpaw (planning ahead will always take a backseat to L-R matchups for our JT).
Our pinch hitting machine.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.