Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
* * *
What can I say? I think T.J. Simers has Kent v. Bradley covered. The best part about Simers' story is, he just lays out what he understands and doesn't try to draw conclusions about what he doesn't.
For those of you who are sure that either Milton Bradley or Jeff Kent will be gone by next season, remember that people said the same thing about Bradley last year and Odalis Perez, oh, every six months or so.
* * *
Luke Hochevar? I don't know. Seems like a $2.5 million signing bonus should be enough for the Dodgers' top draft pick. Even if his value were to go up during his senior year of school, Hochevar doesn't figure to make all that money back. Since he's reportedly requesting $4 million now, his next team would basically have to pay him a bonus of at least $6.5 million to make the holdout financially prudent. That's 160 percent more than the Dodgers' current offer, when Hochevar will have less leverage.
If the Dodgers and Hochevar both want to see him in the team's system now, it would be silly for a contract not to be signed. But senior year can be a priceless experience - just ask me or Matt Leinart. So I won't criticize Hochevar if he stays in school.
Update: Tennessee coach Rod Delmonico believes Hochevar is returning to school, according to the Knoxville News-Sentinel:
The 21-year-old from Fowler, Colo., enrolled for fall-semester classes at UT, but didn't attend his first-day classes on Wednesday. The Dodgers would lose their rights to Hochevar once he attends a class.
"He's got until next Friday to get in school and be OK," Delmonico said. "He is eligible. If he starts school, it's over (with the Dodgers) and he's back for his senior year. That's all I know."
Update 2: That $6.5 million figure mentioned above isn't right.
Classes start today. If Hochevar goes to class, the Dodgers lose rights.
I do think that Kent's style does not lend itself to being that of a leader, at least not in his first year with a team. If he had been here a couple of years, then he may have more pull. It takes a while to warm up to him. I still kinda don't like him, from his Giants days. :-)
Simers "asked if he was trying to suggest the Dodgers were trying to keep the number of African American players in check, but he said no."
Seems like the type of thing that should be kept quiet to me.
Minny had SP III before Torriiii Hunter went down.
As far as the money spend on developing players, I would assume that the difference is accounted for by all the academies set up in Latin countries to scout those players. Teams don't really need to go to another country to scout African-American players. I generally think that teams today are interesting in making money first and foremost, with winning second and all other potential motives and goals far behind. I think that teams will go where they think they can find players. Ten years from now when every team has an academy set up in India, I can't imagine anyone wondering why teams are spending more on scouting those players than Latin players. It's just the business.
I assume that Bradley thinks that because Kent has the racial insensitivity, Kent initiated it. But whatever. I agree that Bradley can make some contradictory statements.
It only says that Wallach acknowledged that he did not know that Penny had talked with Kent at the time that he confronted Penny.
sadly, lew ford has no soul
soul patrol I was jones/hunter/lawton, correct?
And Shannon Stewart hurt himself last night, so there will be less soul in Minneapolis.
I don't know, I guess I'm just tired of reading about these grown men arguing like children and would be more interested in hearing the hitting coach discuss some issues related to hitting, like why his leadoff hitter refuses to see more than three pitches per at bat.
Guys like Bradley are an exception.
But yeah, getting mad at a pitcher who doesn't want to hit a batter intentionally? I'm not behind that.
I am not surprised that the hitting coach wants his hitters protected...I'm just surprised that it is in the papers. It sounded to me like a fair exchange that got settled rather quickly.
My impression of Wallach is not that he is sitting around talking about what players our pitchers should hit that day. My guess is that he is working on hitting issues with every hitter on our team. Good coaches have a player focused on one area at a time...most people (even professional athletes) cannot make multiple adjustments at once. I have no doubt he is working with Izturis on his hitting although since he likely has multiple issues to work on, pitch selection may or may not be Wallach's first choice.
But whatever happened to players and coaches just saying, "No comment"?
Maybe that went out of style the same year that umpires started yelling back at players and coaches instead of turning their backs.
It didn't sound to me like Penny did not want to hit a player intentionally. Instead, he left it up to Kent and Kent told him not to do it. If Kent said to do it, he would have been willing to do it.
The NFL has a better handle on things, but then, they've broken the back of their players' union too.
It's an interesting read.
http://tinyurl.com/e2vfc
I can't tell you how many otherwise wonderful people have made absolutely jaw-dropping statements to me -- in jest or in ignorance -- about people of color. It's sick and it's sad, and while I want to hope Milton Bradley is dead wrong, I'm left to wonder if maybe we ought to listen to him a bit more than we are.
And yes, I apologize for stereotyping Kent based on his choice of offseason locale. Obviously (and hopefully), not all SWM (Southern white males) are racist rednecks. Brad Penny certainly seems to rise above such nonsense.
It seems Bradley is taking on a role that is bigger than "leader of the Dodgers", thats the only way I can justify him taking these statements to the media... or else he appears to be a somewhat insecure individual who is trying to get everybody on his side in this matter.
Racism is real, as are false (and malicious) accusations of racism. And in the politically correct age that we live in, to be accused is tantamout to being convicted - you're guilty until proved innocent - so it's a dangerous weapon to wield. But maybe I'm over-sensitized to these things, seeing as how I've been in university settings for the last 20 years. PC run amok, and it's too bad, because it becomes cliche and gets in the way of real progress sometimes.
But to me, the gist of Bradley's objection to Kent's "leadership" has nothing to do with race, and everything to do with Kent talking the leadership talk, but not ACTING like a leader. I'll be surprised if Bradley doesn't retract the "racist" part of the accusation, at least for public consumption. And I'll be surprised if either guy is off the team next year.
These are a couple of weird guys. Bradley has a persecution complex, and Kent was pegged accurately by GoBears in 31 above. It's kind of unfortunate, but not untypical for people touched by a kind of genius to be impolite and self-centered. If we accept that Ernest Hemingway and Ezra Pound (to pick two of thousands of possible examples) could sometimes say or do things that were completely unacceptable and yet teach their works in every major university, we can accept that a couple of our ballplayers have twisted views of the world.
Is that you? I thought you were dead. Come back, I miss you.
What does this mean exactly? If the understanding was that baseball invests much more in developing white players than it has in African-American players, then I think there would be an issue.
Because the NBA is predominantly black, does that mean that the NBA invests more in black players vs. white? No, I don't think so. I think in America itself the issue is cultural-geographical. My guess is that many more white kids play organized baseball growing up and inversely more black kids play organized basketball. I don't think it is an investment issue related to race at all.
Luke Hochevar is making a big mistake. He's a pitcher not a position player. The colleges are littered with pitchers who blew their arm out. The only way this works for him financially is to become the number one pick. To do that he is going to have to have one hell of season. I don't really care if we sign him or not. It would have been a nice bonus to have picked up such a talent with our late pick but I'm not going to castigate the Dodgers for not giving a pitcher the huge bonus they are looking for. I'd increase the bonus myself but I wouldnt' increase it to 4 million. I'd give a little and hope they give a little. If not, then take your chances and the odds aren't in his favor that he will come out better financially by playing his senior card. I'm always bemused by baseball holdouts over a million dollars. The faster they get to the big leagues the faster that million becomes 10 million per year. 2 1/2 million is enough protection if you blow your arm out. The rest is just ego.
I totally agree with Rob's comment, 33.
I also think that Simers' piece was his best, and I generally don't like him.
As for the Hochevar situation, I've always tried to see Boras as a businessman and ignore the criticisms of him as frustrations from those that he beats. However, more and more often I see stories of players who re-enter the draft and make like 50,000 more, less the salary they would have made the previous year. I'm starting to believe that Boras plays hardball with rookies, at their expense, to maintain his reputation when it comes to his FA negotiations. It's really a shame for some of these kids, especially those that don't become superstars. There is some interesting insight about Boras and baseball agents in general in "License to Deal" by Jerry Crasnick.
The result of this being that baseball isn't racist per se, but that baseball practices can lead to a declining percentage of African-American players. It's not intentionally related to race, but it conceivably relates to race.
I plan on cheering loudly when Bradley comes to the plate if he plays. I plan on doing the same thing for Kent. Outside of the Korean Crusher, they are my two favorite players on the 2005 Dodgers.
Basketball can be 3-on-3 with a concrete court and metal nets; it's just easier to find places and equipment to play with. And never underestimate Michael Jordan's star power, or that of Iverson and the rest of the NBA.
I absolutely agree that it should have been handled behind closed doors -- Bradley, IMHO did the right thing when he went to Tracy, and the wrong thing by talking to the media afterwards.
I don't know what Kent said (or said multiple times)... but as he pointed out, he's played for and been mentored by several high-profile African-Americans, so it's hard to think that it's specifically a racism thing -- though it may be an insensitivity thing.
But unless the comments he said were so insulting and racist, I don't see what anyone gains by taking it public.
How many African-Americans are there in the majors now who grew up in cities?
Bradley
Willis
Sheffield
Sabathia (he was born in Vallejo, so I don't know if he qualifies)
Patterson
There are players like Griffey and Bonds who had much different upbringings. Edwin Jackson was a military kid I believe. So was Dmitri Young.
Juan Pierre and Chone Figgins grew up in the South. Jeter grew up in a middle class family.
Agree completely.
The result of this being that baseball isn't racist per se, but that baseball practices can lead to a declining percentage of African-American players. It's not intentionally related to race, but it conceivably relates to race.
And what I was trying to convey in 38 is that you could substitute "African-American" with "white" above and it would be just as true.
I'm a lot like Bradley: I thrive on group work, I care what others think of me, I want everyone on the team to be included and I don't want anyone to be left out or me to be left out. That's a syllable-for-syllabe description of me in the recently concluded LAUSD District Intern Orientation Program. I was open to suggestions from everyone because my own confidence as an educator was just beginning to blossom. This prompted some to call me a "leader" because I was high-energy guy who was the life of the group.
In the program, I worked with another guy who was a lot like Kent: an intense, experienced educator. He cared deeply about the profession, knew what he was doing and didn't mind letting people know as much. He was a little removed from the rest of us but far from unfriendly. He just tended to keep to himself unless he was called upon to work with a group (which he would do quite well). He did not like being told what to do or how to do things; he'd done it all before. This prompted some to call him a "veteran leader" because he'd seen more than the rest of us (13-year old Devin Brown was in his classroom; he told me movingly how he had to deal with that but he did not share it with the group in spite of my suggestion he do so).
I'm white. The other guy I just described is black. We clashed a couple of times. Most people who dealt with him said I had plenty of company. We became good friends but we didn't have to co-exist in a highly competitive environment where many people watch and judge your every move. If we did, I think we'd be both be in the headlines. I'm glad to say we are not because I value his friendship. I don't doubt that such a friendship would not have been possible had we both been primary players for a major sports team.
If you want to ask why not set up academies in African-American communities, well, that may be a constructive notion. But perhaps MLB looks at black American and white American prospects as being essentially alike, and that there is no need to treat them differently.
43 I'd give it a shot but I'm still recovering from the last time I tried to write like Plaschke. Every time I type more than one sentence in a paragraph, my fingers twitch.
It is me, but no, I'm not coming back.
None of which speaks to the question as to whether Jeff Kent is racist or insensitive, or whatever. But it does point to numerous reasons to question the conclusion that racism is a general phenomenon in MLB and at the root of the representation question.
I thought I meant something to you...:)
(But seriously, what gives?)
Damon Hollins of Tampa Bay went to Vallejo High, where he played against my school (he was varsity when I was JV). I also played against Jermaine Dye, who grew up in the Bay Area suburbs as well.
Did you only mean major metropolitan cities, or does any American city count?
Nope, this is a substitute board for me. I just got tired of all the Laker board refugees on that board, plus, this one just has so much more and better information on the Dodgers than that board, so I just decided to stop going there.
Anyway, fare thee well. You'll be missed (and already have been).
"This just in: The Los Angeles Dodgers have announced that for the first time, they will not be calling up any players from Triple-A Las Vegas when the major league rosters expand Sept. 1.
That's a joke sports fans -- like the one the Dodgers pulled on the 51s by putting those players here in the first place."
And I'm still looking to see where it was announced.
Bradley said a lot yesterday, but the thing I hold onto is: "Jeff Kent is the best option around at second base. So why wouldn't I want to be on a team with Jeff Kent? We don't have to be friends." I hope that is not just happy talk but how he really feels.
All that talk about TV and movies yesterday got me to thinking: wouldn't Bradley be the perfect protagonist in a Spike Lee baseball movie?
69 - I don't get that joke at all.
Well, I didn't talk primarily about the Dodgers, because being stuck out here in Chicago, I don't have a lot to say, that's why I don't post very much on these comments, but just read them. I talked a lot about off-topic things, because that is where I have more knowledge.
Like I said before keep an eye out for the August 31 Dodger game at Wrigley when I'll be the first person kicked out for verbally abusing their 7-year old daughter at the park.
Would it be detente or rapprochement?
I ask this question mainly because of the length of the words.
I'm guessing the best we could hope for at this point would be detente. Which would be sufficient.
Not being black, I cannot understand what Milton is going thru or faces on a daily basis. The race issue is always right out there for all to see all the time.
It has always seemed to me that playing the race card, so to speak, can be an easy way of avoiding dealing with what may be an uncomfortable situation, or not dealing with it. This is not to say that too often race isn't an issue.
I have always been a Bradley defender, loving his spirit and fire. However, I do find these comments from him difficult to take, and believe they would have best been kept in the clubhouse behind closed doors.
Personally, I suspect that if they were riding a successful season, I don't think any of this would have amounted to much. This is a case of two aggressive ambitious athletes frustrated at how the season has unfolded.
detente: The easing of strained relations, esp. in a political situation.
rapprochement: A coming or bringing together, an establishment of harmonious relations.
Hmmm, I think detente is more attainable than rapprochement. That said, this is a more personal than political situation, though political issues have been raised.
My favorite phrase from the detente era is "Trust but verify." I find a use for it at least once a week.
http://www.al.com/sports/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/sports/1124702305169870.xml&coll=3
From the article:
"The defense was unstoppable," said Davitt, who was drafted in the ninth round of the June draft by the Los Angeles Dodgers, but signed with Okaloosa-Walton Community College.
This is the only news I had heard regarding Davitt. He and Hochevar are the only 2 unsigned draft picks of the first 15 rounds.
bold a comment by putting asterisks around your intended phrase
use www.tinyurl.com to format your big links
Thanks, db1022
Woo hoo!
As for pitchers, without Osoria, no one in Vegas has an ERA under 4.18 (Alfredo Gonzalez), and after that is 5.11 (Pat Mahomes)
Hochevar would be a tough loss, but I'm willing to accept it if he goes back to school
Neyer's list (which didn't need to be longer than one) was highlighted by one Mr. Albert Pujols.
The emailer also said to "just look at the stats, Rob". So Rob did. Guess who won that one?
Would you like me to post the article, or is that unethical?
Icaros,
I'm looking for African-Americans who tended to come from major metropolitan areas in the U.S. I would think their upbringing would differ from guys like Bonds and Griffey who probably didn't have to worry about getting equipment or coaching.
Vallejo would be close enough. It's in the seven-county area that defines the San Francisco-Oakland SMSA.
Mark Prior was the guilty party.
I was looking for current players.
Anyone heard anything about George McDonald? He's a 16th round pick that we were suppose to sign some point after he finished some series. Last I heard he said he planned on getting a deal done this year
Drafting Hochevar was a calculated risk, but it's not like every or even any draftee's highest salary demands get met.
Bernie Williams grew up in Puerto Rico
Gary Sheffield is from Tampa (and on my original list)
Derek Jeter was born in New Jersey and grew up in Kalamazoo, Michigan I believe.
I think it is foolish to risk injury in hopes of getting more money. Anyway, as a UT grad, I would have like having a UT boy on the farm.
There's a difference between not meeting a player's initial asking price, and only going halfway to that asking price as your top offer. Of course your answer about Hochevar going all the way through the draft without being picked is just silly, as the price of the risk goes down dramatically the lower the pick you waste.
his secondary pitches are very raw and the dodgers want to see how he does at the CC this year before deciding if they want to sign him or not.
on the hoch standoff, luke will be making a huge mistake if he doesnt sign and goes back in next year drafts. thats all there really is too it, he wont sniff the money he is being currently offered.
Well, guys from Inglewood. But not Horacio Ramirez.
But even with Boras clients, I wouldn't assume that the pre-draft contract demand is ironclad, and I don't see why the Dodgers had to be prepared to spend what, if I'm not mistaken, would have been unusual money even for a top-5 pick.
Bob,
Francouer was also intentionally walked last Sunday...Otsuka was the guilty party in that case (you probably mentioned that on Sunday's post but I have not read that).
Any chance that Choi gets the start against the RHP submarine korean pitcher BY Kim? Kim has been hit pretty hard by lefties so far this year. Perhaps Buntermaker will play the arm angle card. Buntermaker doesn't seem to like to let Choi face Korean pitchers. vr, Xei
"Why do so many believe that Erstad is a better player than he actually is? For one thing, we like him. We really, really do. He plays hard. He wears that black stuff under his eyes when the sun is shining. He slams into walls and catchers. He plays the way we think we would play -- if only we got the chance.
Of course three someones [Moreno, Stoneman, Scioscia] thought Erstad was worth more than his numbers. So what? How many powerful someones thought Randy Johnson, Carl Pavano, and Jaret Wright would make for a crackerjack pitching rotation this season? How many powerful someones thought Jim Thome was worth a long-term contract for a gazillion bucks? Oh, and didn't the same three powerful someones who gave Erstad his shiny contract also think that Steve Finley was the cat's pajamas?
But getting back to your fundamental question, I can only guess that Moreno and Stoneman ponied up for Erstad because they believed 1) that his value does, indeed, extend beyond his performance on the field, and that 2) his performance on the field might again approach its former heights. It's easy to forget now, but at one point Erstad was actually a good hitter. This season marks his ninth as an everyday player (including 2003, most of which he missed because of a hamstring injury). Here are Erstad's Adjusted OPS (OPS+) totals in his first eight seasons (remember, 100 is league average):
[a table with frightening numbers - think if Jason Phillips started at 1B since 2000. Ok now stop screaming.]
So we remember his successes, we forget his failures, we ignore his lack of power, and we pretend the $8.25 million this season couldn't have been better spent elsewhere (not to mention the $7.75 million last season and the $8 million-plus next season).
To me that risk was not calculated very well given how likely they were to sign. Obviously where they seem to be erring is on how low one is willing to go. There is just a huge opportunity cost here. If they weren't willing to go higher, they had to have seen that their chances of signing him weren't higher than 50%. Now to do you take a 50% chance at a top 10 player, or a 90% chance at a top 50 player?
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/chat/chat.php?chatId=141
I don't know Parker's stats, adjusted for league and era. But just because it was said about him that his defensive value didn't make up for any offensive liabilities doesn't make it false. He might very well have been the Erstad of the 1960s. Then again, that was a pitchers' era.
Interesting article. Boras seems reasonable here, but then...
He says he puts more weight on the first contract than on contracts to follow because of future risks -- fair enough. But then he says that 100% of his college players go on to become major leaguers. With a success rate like that, wouldn't there to be some way to balance the risk involved in the first contract?
Let's not forget that what we're seeing right now from Hochevar could still be a ploy. Not saying that it is, just reminding of the possibility.
Bradley 2 for 5
Cruz 2 for 4
Izturis 2 for 3
Kent 5 for 18
Ledee 1 for 3
A Perez 0 for 3
Phillips 0 for 2
Repko 1 for 3
Robles 2 for 3
Saenz 2 for 4
Valentin 0 for 2
Weaver 0 for 1
Werth 0 for 4
Surprisingly Choi has never faced Kim. And he has the arm angle in his favor!
I'm neither an agent nor a lawyer, but I think that agents have another role: that of career advisor. He might say, "X is in your best short-term interests -- you don't know how things are going to play out in your future -- but under other scenarios, Y might be better. To make your descision, you need to weigh . . ."
I don't think Boras is evil or even misguided for thinking the way he does -- just wondering if he has more than one role with the player.
He has a career OPS+ of 111.
He had one fluky year in 1970 when be batted .319 and led the NL in doubles with 47. He hit just 10 home runs that season.
Parker remains as the lone alum of Claremont McKenna (Claremont Men's in his day) that made it to the big leagues.
One of Parker's problems about playing was that he didn't like the hours. I read a book once where he talked about how he waited having to wait around all day for a game to start. He felt like he was wasting his time. When he played in Japan, he was given a much fuller practice schedule and the games started earlier.
Boras technically isn't an agent for Hochevar because he's entered into no fiduciary agreement. No money has changed hands. Above board.
Boras is just Hochevar's "friend".
145 - maybe not the most likely scenario, but entirely possible.
And I think Wes Parker graduated from Harvard High in 1958. That's he was billed in a Harvard Westlake Alumni Golf Tournament.
Parker's team won.
Harry Kingman, who is the only Pomona College grad to make it to the majors (Pomona and Claremont McKenna are both part of the same system), also went to Harvard High.
154 - thanks. That's why I find it hard to take the $5 million or even $4 million request seriously. Essentially, Hochevar is asking the Dodgers to pay a 50-percent premium or more to get him a year sooner.
Dave is not as civilized and well-bred as Harry was and he went to the school on Figueroa. You know, it's across the street from a Sizzler.
andrew miller UNC
daniel bard UNC
ian kennedy USC
max scherzer UM
some other ones i cant remember. hoch will have a hard time getting in the top 5.
Well, I only spent the better part of six months researching the guy's life. And I even went to UC Berkeley to read his collected papers. And touch his handwritten letter from Gandhi that he received.
Why is that an OK generalization? I haven't heard that line questioned once in the paper or on the radio or here.
163 - You're right. Wes is old enough to be my dad ... but not quite as old as my dad. Did I say decade and a half? Bump that up by another decade.
April 12 Dodgers 9, Giants 8
April 27 Diamondbacks 6, Dodgers 3
May 4 Nationals 5, Dodgers 2
May 21 Angels 3, Dodgers 1
May 30 Cubs 5, Dodgers 3
June 3 Brewers 7, Dodgers 5
June 11 Twins 5, Dodgers 3
July 16 Dodgers 5, Giants 4
Your point makes sense. When so much nonsense comes from someone you start put a little less stock into what they say.
I know.
The fact is, white people feel a tremendous sense of privilege to move about a place like Los Angeles, even in predominately non-white neighborhoods. Whites might be afraid of crime, but we don't as a rule feel like we "shouldn't" be there or are arousing suspicion just because of our ethnicity. Similarly, if a white person in an office is having trouble with their boss, we analyze it as having to do with differing philosophies, expectations, poor chemistry--whatever--but probably not race, even if that boss is black, Latino or Asian. But a black person who is having trouble with a white boss has no choice but to entertain the possibility that it is due to race.
In the past 50 years, the race issue has evolved from a legal one, i.e. formal, legal barriers to equality, to a primarily psychological one. This is the entire rationale for continued affirmative action. It is assumed that among some whites, including some whites who are in power, there are unconscious or unacknowledged negative racial attitudes that account for disparities in outcome, and that these disparities should be offset by a conscious program to strongly encourage inclusion.
This is a long way of saying that I think Bradley's comment about the general failure of whites to "see race" in situations like this one is defensible. "Never" might be too strong, but "very, very seldom" would be right on. Bradley is also right in saying that whites, generally, don't want to deal with racial issues. They're uncomfortable, and they upset widespread notions that whites are "over" racism. It's a disease on the run, thank God, but it is not over.
Kent might be an equal-opportunity a-hole, but if you're a black guy on the receiving end of it--the only black guy on the team--it is understandable why you might think your race had something to do with it. That's just the reality of our society.
2) The human animal being what it is, individuals will always look for rationalizations about why they just don't get along with other individuals. And in a multiracial, multiethnic society, race and ethnicity are excuses that lie close at hand. I suspect that that's what's going on with Bradley and Kent.
I think most of the "underpaid" ballplayers are "underpaid" because of lack of MLB time rather than any other issue.
2)Wes Parker was always one of my favorites. Supposedly he was an heir to the Parker pen fortune, which according to John Roseboro's autobiography, led some teammates to question his work ethic.
But he was awesome in '70, and used a pretty heavy bat, if the game used one I have of his is typical.
I also think it will have very little impact on the Dodgers' ability to win going forward.
August 24, 1925
On a contentious day at Ebbets Field, Brooklyn and Chicago split a
doubleheader. Brooklyn won the first game, 13-6 and the Cubs took the
second game, 11-6. Brooklyn was now 56-61 and 15 ½ games behind first
place Pittsburgh and in fifth place.
In the opener, Brooklyn was leading 1-0 in the third. Burleigh Grimes
struck out Cubs right fielder Cliff Heathcote, who complained to home
plate umpire Charlie Wilson, who ejected Heathcote. In the bottom of
the inning, Cubs pitcher Percy Jones walked Zack Wheat on a pitch that
Cubs catcher Gabby Hartnett thought was a strike. And Wilson ejected
Hartnett. This sent the entire Cubs bench into a frenzy and in the
end; Wilson ejected everyone on the Cubs bench except player-manager
Rabbit Maranville, a coach, and two other reserves.
So Jones had to finish out the game and Brooklyn scored 9 times
against him in the third and added three more in the eighth. Zack
Wheat and Jack Fournier hit home runs for Brooklyn. The Cubs scored
all their runs in the eighth.
The nightcap was a little more peaceful. Joe Bush pitched for the Cubs
and went the distance, giving up six runs, including Wheat's second
home run of the day. Meanwhile the Cubs bashed out 15 hits against
Rube Erhardt, Joe Oeschger, Bill Hubbell and Guy Cantrell.
Brooklyn finished 68-85 and tied with Philadelphia for sixth place, 27
games behind the first place Pirates. The Cubs finished a half game
behind Brooklyn and Philadelphia in last place. Brooklyn lost 17 of
its last 19 games.
Wheat finished third in the NL in batting average at .359 and third in
doubles with 42. Fournier was third in the NL in homers with 22 and
second in OBP at .446 with a league-leading 86 walks. Rogers Hornsby
led the NL in batting at .403 as part of a Triple Crown winning season
as he hit 39 home runs and drove in 143.
Grimes got a win on August 24, but 1925 was one of the worst seasons
in his long career. He was 12-19 with a 5.04 ERA. Dazzy Vance kept
Brooklyn out of the cellar with a stellar 22-9 record and a 3.53 ERA
and he led the league in strikeouts with 221.
Chicago's manager on this day, Maranville, would end up playing for
the Dodgers in 1926. The Cubs would use three managers in 1925,
Maranville being the second one in between the tenures of Bill
Killefer and George Gibson.
The Dodgers went through a procession of owners in 1925. Charles
Ebbets passed away on April 18 from heart failure. Co-owner Edward
McKeever caught a cold at Ebbets's funeral, which turned into
pneumonia and killed him. McKeever's brother, Steve, took over the
team and gave manager Wilbert Robinson the title of president. This
setup would not serve the Dodgers well in the coming years. It would
take a couple of decades before the Dodgers had any financial
stability.
Thanks to the Chicago Tribune, BaseballReference.com. Dodgers.com and Retrosheet
The alltime leader is Pete Runnels who was 0 for 10 in 1952.
Old friend Jose Offerman was 0 for 8 in 2000.
Eight others have had 0 for 7 years in steals, most recently Chet Lemon in 1983.
Though I grew up in Ventura, I've lived in the south, Texas and Kentucky, I totally agree with Bradley's comments about redneck jokes and attitudes - the mental thought process is 40 years behind the times it seems, with some folks, just as described by Simers' article.
I left out that another one of the owners after the death of Ebbets and Edward McKeever was the Brooklyn Trust Company.
That was a company that employed a lawyer named Walter O'Malley.
It looks like Milton's injury is not serious enough to keep him out so there might be some disciplinary action coming up.
Odalis Perez got called into McCourt's office too. It was probably just a chance for everybody to get all their complaints out on the table.
My worst case guess is that Bradley has asked to be DFA'd or traded so he can play elsewhere, and McCourt will announce he has acceded to this request. My best case guess is that McCourt is creating a diversity committee and Bradley will be a member of it.
I'm thinking Milton is sticking around and might be forced to make some public sign of reconciliation with Kent.
Bradley will ask to be traded if Tracy is fired. But I doubt he would ask over this.
I'll try to say something arcane to the other people in my section. Maybe Robles will be CS and I can invoke the name of Offerman!
Early Lineups...
SS Robles
1B Choi
LF Ledee
2B Kent
3B Saenz
CF Werth
C Navarro
RF Cruz, Jr.
P Houlton
Q: How can you tell when Bob Timmerman is saying something arcane?
A: His lips are moving.
208 That is my interpretation as well. It's unfortunate the Bradley didn't put it so elequently, but I'm willing to extend him at least that much benefit of the doubt. And I hope he begins to feel secure enough in his role with the team that he stops feeling sensitive about Kent's attitude, because I really want Bradley around for a while, and Kent around for another year.
I'm off! Fifteen rows behind home plate! I may never have seats this good again! And yes, I plan on calling everyone and my mother on the cell phone if I'm on TV. I think I'm sitting just a shade too far back so you'll all be spared.
Predictions on who gets booed and cheered? Julian thinks Bradley gets booed tonight. I'm inclined to agree though I as I said a few miles upthread, I'll be cheering both players.
"There are things he said off the cuff that I don't interpret as funny," he said. "I think it may be funny to him and maybe Jeff Foxworthy, but it's not funny to Milton Bradley."
I've been listening to too much talk-radio I guess, where the charge is that Kent is a flat-out racist. I read through the comments, but the talk-radio tone is still buzzing in my ear. I need a pallate cleansing cigarette.
Did anybody know that Jeff Foxworthy has sold more albums than any other comic, ever? More than Richard Pryor. Mostly because he's Walmart friendly. Crazy.
http://slate.msn.com/id/2117112/
This whole thing is overblown.
Bottom line, Milton is a little bit of a headcase, and Kent is kind of a jerk. Milton is also very intelligent and misunderstood.
http://tinyurl.com/79po9
Too ridiculous...
Sarcasm aside, I think the super-platoon of Valentine/Ledee/Repko/Perez??? will be our Bradley replacements.
Who knows, perhaps Jason Phillips has some outfielder in him too.
I am from Walnut Creek and still live her except when I am in Santa Barbara during the school year and Walnut Creek is yuppie central.
I'm not buying he's out for the season until I see it officially, since I've also read on the dodger board that he was suspended for tonight's game (per A Martinez on pregame show).
I, for one, welcome our new scappy overlords.
Seriously, I've never seen anything like this in professional sports before. The only instance of this many injuries I've ever on a single team was my senior year of high school cross country, when we went through seven guys to fill the #5 spot, with injuries including getting hit by a train.
http://www.linkmeister.com/blog/archives/000082.html
I was in a cast for 3 months.
A man can dream.
"Tension had also grown between Kent and Bonds: a midseason shoving match in the Giants dugout was widely reported."
AND
"Furthermore, he acquired a poor reputation in the clubhouse where he was known for a quick temper and isolationism."
His "isolationism" may result from his isolated ranch in Texas.
Or it may result from "Texas."
I think DePo finally told Tracy to do it his way for the final month.
I'd vote Navarro due to no one else really standing out and because, due to his walk rate, he seems to have the most potential of the group. Hmm, well he and Broxton.
But if chemistry is really all that important, How do you explain Oakland winning three championships in the early 70's. Or the cardinals of the 1930's, the "gashouse gang". Although its not baseball, its certainly close to home, the recent laker championship teams. Maybe, just maybe, what the sports writers call "team chemistry", not only has nothing to do with winning, but it actually prevents winning.
The "boys of summer" dodgers of the 1950's had great clubhouse chemistry. I know this because sports writers said so, and they are the ones that decide this stuff. They were a great team for many years. And they have one world series to show for it. The Braves have rarely, if ever, had clubhouse issues. They put a high emphasis on a certain type of "makeup". Again many good teams, and not much success in the post season.
Why is this, why are their some teams that have great chemistry, but have trouble winning in the postseason? While other teams have serious personality conflicts, yet somehow string championships together? Is there a connection?
251- Thanks.
This injury streak is incredible and hitting people I just hoped might have potential. At least not a lot of long term contracts, which I think are going to go the way of the Drive In Movie. Remember Brown's 7 Year w/medicare package. So maybe they can put whats his name (right field, though I never saw what made him worth >5mil a year)back together for next year. And we can buy a few more till the farms start producing. Oh yeah--J.D.Drew
http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/story/8768702
Broxton, Aybar (who'll see some PT at 3B), maybe Hanrahan?
1. I have been a Champion of Milton Bradley since he was acquired;
2. I stood up for him when he blew up, was suspended, arrested and jailed;
3. I said he would grow up;
4. Kent has been crucified in the media MORE than Bradley-he just doesn't care about it as much;
5. I used to hate Kent-especially as a Giant;
6. Bradley was called out by Kent in private;
7. Bradley called Kent out in public - that's chickenbleep anyway you look at it;
8. Bradley says that what Kent called him out for was not racial, but then plays the race card by saying Kent is insensitive to blacks;
8. Which is it? Racial or not? "I called Kent out and it's not racial, but I don't think he knows how to deal with blacks?" WHAT USE IS THAT?
9. Milton has not dealt with why Kent called him out. Hummmmmmmmm:
10. At the very least, Bradly is a Racist. At most, he is a stupid racist!
11. Saying "I'm glad I'm black or as long as I'm still black, everything is OK" is about as racist as you can get.
12. Jeff Kent has been classy throughout all of this. Milton has been the anthetsis of class his whole career.
13. Anyone who sticks up for Milton on this has a closet racist agenda (IMHO);
I am sick of the fact that some blacks (like Milton) expect whites (like me) to always act a certain way, but they can say whatever they want about us. That's BS!
Before you say that I am a racist, consider this:
My wife is Filipino, my daughter-in-law is Chinese, I have two black brother-in-laws, one Italian brother-in-law & my best friend is black.
Me? I'm a mongrel. There was probably a German, Black, Swedish, Indian relative somewhere in the past. I don't really care.
I dislike stereotypes, but I'd stereotype Asians as "hard workers" who bloom where they are planted. I have two Filipino step-kids who are extremely hard workers and one "white" son who is currently worthless!
My point is: To me, skin color is unimportant. Talent, ethics and desire are king with me.
I have never felt so important as when I have been to a party attended only by blacks. I also have never felt more alone than at a picnic with Filipinos and Chinese. There are prejudices both ways. We all have 'em - we need to get over it already. Milton hasn't!
Don't be foolish and stick up for him!
Sorry about that...
Choi is the Korean dictator of walks :)
I'd love to see Delwyn Young come up September 1st.He can flatout hit.
He was the guy carrying drinks.
Are we seeing a pichers duel or two teams that can't hit.
Ruggiano has been hitting well and 23 is not awful, but he started at Vero and thats a long climb.
Didn't we (i.e. fans/media) demand Bradley change his attitude and "get help" last year for doing the exact same things Kent has done this year, and other years on other teams?
Where's the accountability for Kent here?
today's lineup is good except i would have perez instead of robles and at the same leadoff spot where robles is.
One of my most enjoyable classed in HS was African American history. Got to talk a lot, and had probably the most open dialogue I ever experienced in school. And I still find it funny to remember the jaw dropping reaction of my counselor when I chose the class.
We're all to some extent victims of ours and others perceptions. The problem comes when we let them rule us.
vr, Xei
1. Chemistry may very well be caused by winning rather than the other way around.
2. I'm not sure that any GM in the world is capable of putting together a "good team chemistry", because no one really knows how to measure it. Except Joe Morgan, John Kruk, and Harold Reynolds, who just slap that label on whatever teams/players they happen to like at the moment.
This has to be Kim's best performance this season.
Milton is now out for the season. I say, let it die. The only reason it's such a huge story in the first place is because the media wanted it to be a big story.
the good thing is, this is DJs second strong start in a row since he made his pregame adjustment of starting the game better.
hopefully him anc jackson and pitch well for the remainder of the year and solidfy two rotation spots for next year.
So, we're going to ostracize people for having `isolationist tendencies'? Look out, thought police.
I said "set race aside" and then you go and use it in your post.
Again, where is the accountability for Kent. Besides the water bottle incident that was instigated by a fan, Kent has yelled at just as many if not more umpires this year, and has had a shoving match with BARRY BONDS!!! You've got to be a real bastard to get in a shoving match with Barry Bonds (although the thought of it brings a smile to my face).
Anyway, why don't we take a minute, drop the race card, and talk about JEFF KENT and his shortcomings.
P.S. Does anyone have Milton's email? I'd like to send a get-well card.
i guess they were using him as a LOOGY
I think Bradley is the one who went public, making him the one who wanted it to be a big story imho. Also, I am not assigning blame to either player. Like you said, there is probably plenty of blame to go around for both players. It won't die until Bradley stops giving/seeking interviews on it. vr, Xei
He was too busy studying the numbers and putting the best lineups on the field.
You do? Is there some kind of list of players that if you shove make you a bastard? vr, Xei
This is a guy who had Kent for 6 years! You don't even know Kent and he's insolent?
Jeff Kent is a loner. He shows up. He gives 100%. He gets in players grills who don't. He dislikes the media and they hate him and write about it. But you hear this insolent thing from the media. You heard Bradley spew his own vitrol! Nuff said!
Yes, and I'm looking at you Switzerland.
Come on!! Barry Bonds? What could he say to make you mad enough to shove him? Would he yell at you in his falsetto?? Jeff Kent is a bully.
The first is his value to the Dodgers based on an a reasonable probability and expectation of major league performance prior to free agency. This number is likely higher than $4 million. Based on his BP interview, it seems this is the way Boras would be approaching the situation.
The second is his value in the draft market. This number is likely closer to $3 million, and clearly below $4 million. This became fairly apparent since none of the teams ahead of the Dodgers selected him based on the expected bonus demands. After factoring in the time and leverage Hochevar would lose by waiting for next year's draft, his market value is probably close to the $2.5 million the Dodgers are offering.
In a unrestricted free agent market, these numbers should be closer together, but the draft intentionally introduces this discrepancy. The Dodgers took a risk on Hochevar feeling like their leverage would give them a decent chance to sign him within their budget ($2.5+ million). If not, they could invest the money in other ways and perhaps get a better return on their investment. Paul DePodesta has consistently said that the player budget is fluid between draft, player development, team payroll, etc. The money could be used to sign more draft-and-follows, sign a high-priced amateur free agent, add more pitching coaches, add an extra major league bullpen arm, etc.
I don't think Logan White was wrong to select Hochevar, even knowing his bonus demands were going to be $4+ million. By dropping all the way to the 40th pick, Hochevar and Boras lost most of their negotiating leverage.
The tricky part of this situation is that there is definitely upside for Boras to Hochevar holding out, but there's likely only downside for Hochevar. Boras is trying to subvert the draft system and create a "fair" market for his clients. The only way he can do so is by creating artificial leverage with his bonus demands. If it becomes apparent that he will or even may cave, it will hurt his clients moving forward as teams become more willing to "take a chance". But, as people have already pointed out, there's likely only downside for Hochevar in waiting for next year's draft. It seems that in this situation, what is in Scott Boras' best interest is not the same as what is in his client's best interest.
We shall see how it all goes down in the next week or so.
Meanwhile 13-0 mets in AZ.
Wasn't that a John Holmes picture?
vr, Xei
Sort of. I could use a drink refill right about now.
vr, Xei
So, is it official that Bradley is out for the season? vr, Xei
Bruce Bochy just retied his right cleat.
Oops, make that a base hit by olivo and the padres now up 5-2. Too bad Bob isn't watching, he would be proud.
Then we can see JR's adventure in the outfield.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
368, nice reverse curse.
353, isn't martin 22 already?
vr, Xei
a navarro/martin backstop would be way too awesome for it to happen.
i mean, if navarro can succeed, so can the rest of them? right.. right?
eh im only hoping, i just want some bright spots in this failure of a season.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
I'm not the one who would know, but I don't think that is an attribute which grows at his age.
vr, Xei
Good thing Robles made an out.
Dave Roberts flied out in a 14 pitch at bat with the bases loaded to end the 5th inning. still 5-2 Padres in the top of the 6th.
315 If I were sending a card to MB, I'd mail a paper card to Dodger Stadium. 1000 Elysian Park Avenue , LA CA, 90012
I think Bob will be happy to see Darth Ortiz' line from the NYM AZ game. 4.0 IP, 7H, 5 BB, 8 ER.
"Mets rookie Mike Jacobs and David Wright both need a triple for the cycle while Jose Reyes needs a double."
vr, Xei
Away OPS .673
Home OPS 1.001
vr, Xei
Against LH--.333/.389/.530 (.919 OPS)
Against RH--.241/.352/.397 (.749 OPS)
I think the guy should be a ROOGY only at this point.
Nice job of blocking the plate by Navarro. I have to say, I am very, very impressed.
vr, Xei
Also will run a keeper basketball league this year if interested. vr, Xei
We may have a solid middle-rotation starter in Houlton.
We have a good young catcher for 2006.
Things like that.
Remember, you will follow this team the rest of your life, not just this year.
vr, Xei
''It's ridiculous that they worry about stuff like that. It shows they [the Marlins organization] don't know anything about the game. That kind of stuff goes on everywhere. It didn't affect the way he worked, the way he did his job.''
vr, Xei
I used to break things.
100% chance I will still be in denial.
vr, Xei
vr, Xei
we will lose weaver and depodesta will not sign another lowe type pitcher and he won't pay big bucks for burnett.
i also think martin will be ready for next season, that's why phillips will be gone.
said Izturis, who figures to be out awhile
It also mentions Kuo, but it just seems like an information piece rather than a sign of things to come
I might actually rather have Phillips hit than CruzJr, but not sure if there are any OFers left. vr, Xei
Cesar Izturis: $3.10 for 2006; $4.15 for 2007
Oscar Robles (est.): $0.40 for 2006; $0.50 for 2007
I'm sure DePodesta could find something interesting to do with the exra $6.35 million. On top of that, we'd likely get something good in return since Izturis is a "good", young shortstop with a very reasonable contract.
It certainly wouldn't surprise me to see something happen.
Cruz-Perez-Robles-Choi vs Fuentes. HBPs aside, Fuentes ahsn't been too bad. I miss Chacon
vr, Xei
hu will be ready when robles gets expensive.
vr, Xei
we got penny and choi for loduca, mota,encarnacion.
so lets say choi for encarnacion, that leaves loduca and mota for penny.
well izturis is another loduca just at a different position, and repko,phillips and a prospect thats not an elite prospect = mota.
vr, Xei
Yet like most of us, if he comes back and hits in the 8 hole, I'd be fine with it.
at least delwyn young has a homerun tonight.
Robles will never get expensive...not as a bench player.
There's no reason to trade Izturis- the Rockies would probably give up Jason Jennings..that's about all the Dodgers would get for Izturis right now. I'd rather keep him when he'll probably bounce back next year.
so the rest of the season is without drew and bradley, and even tho tracy has been putting good lineups out there the last couple days he will go back to his stupid lineups again, so this season is over.
i'm looking forward to next season.
next season without tracy and izturis and with an addition of brian giles and a starting pitcher that is a little better than weaver and a healthy drew, bradley, gagne and an antonio perez and choi in the lineup.
what makes robles a bench player and izzy not one?
Hoffman (ESPN) just came in to close out the game down south. vr, Xei
2005: .624 OPS
2004: .711 OPS
2003: .597 OPS
2002: .556 OPS
There is a reason to trade Izturis, just like there is a reason to trade any other player on the team. That reason is getting greater value in return. Since Izturis is beloved by the Morgans, Plaschkes, etc. of the world, I'm guessing there is a GM out there who will overpay. Even if we only get fair value in return, if we were able to fill a bigger hole than shortstop, that might be a goood enough reason to do the trade.
for sure. You best hope Izzy comes back strong!
533- no, but he'll be a better defender and will likely raise his trade value- also the Dodgers haven't had any stability at SS in a long time, it's nice to have a SS that plays great defensive (which I expect Izzy to do next year while being for the most part, fully healthy)
Houlton's been outstanding his last two outings.
Izturis is the only position player that DePodesta hasn't replaced so far. That alone seems like it puts him in a tenuous enough position to rule out guarantees.
and look for depodesta to push for brian giles from free agency.
and choi will platoon at 1b next season.
tracy is gone after this season too.
i firmly believe all of the above.
538- he's entering his prime. Check out Omar Vizquel's career...say 1993...kinda looks like another young Venezuelan SS.
Vizquel '93 (26 years old) .255/.319/.298 .617
Izturis '05 (25 years old) .257/.302/.322 .624
I'm sorry that you can't come up with anything better than the he stinks argument without pulling up statistics of a young player that was rushed to the majors.
It will be for everyone's good.
I kept feeling bad for Ledee during the game. He probably thought to himself "Dang, a double! That's hard!"
The crowd was pretty mellow. They liked chanting Hee-Seop Choi and that's about it.
vr, Xei
Painful, painful loss. Just painful. I was just on Dodger Talk and found that I couldn't string two sentences together. This loss hurt.
I also stopped at the grocery store on the way home too.
And, best of all, went to the bathroom.
Heartwarming WaPo story: tinyurl.com/8z9pe
TEN THINGS ABOUT MY NIGHT AT THE STADIUM
1. Incredible seats. If I had the moolah and the connections, I would do that every game.
2. Kent to my knowledge was not booed for the Bradley incident but for his performance tonight. The fans around me were mostly negative about Bradley. Nobody knew Bradley was hurt; I knew because we arrived late and heard Vinny announce it before the game.
3. D.J. Houlton didn't look good because he was pitching against the Rockies, he looked good, period. Great command, good fastball, excellent curve... just a terrific start. I was alone in thinking we should've left him in.
4. The performance of the Korean Krusher was not encouraging; he should've been called out on strikes in his second AB, he didn't hit the ball out of the infield and that 9th inning backwards K was inexplicable. You gotta swing in that situation unless you're damn sure it's a ball.
5. Kim threw a lot of off-speed. He kept smiling when Choi was facing him.
6. Navarro is the Dodgers starting catcher. I wish he could hit for more power--any power would be nice--but he's our regular catcher.
7. A very, very fast game through seven innings. Most of the crowd left after 7.
8. Dear Steve Schmoll,
Please keep the ball down. And tell Yhency the same thing, 'kay? Yours, SB
9. Two dogs, garlic fries (really, salt fries is more accurate), root beer and ice cream. I think my cholestrol is being measured in light years right now.
10. Vin Scully leading the crowd in "Take Me Out to the Ballgame," is just touching. Everyone felt good watching him lead the way. What a treasure.
You're on right before the start of the bottom of the fourth.
You're walking down the aisle with drinks for a good 3-5 seconds.
Choi smiled and probably told him "How the heck should I know, I'm not Japanese!"
They also had the Nisei Queen and her court. The Little Tokyo business people have a big shinding every year and they have a beauty pageant. I believe whomever has the richest sponsor wins.
But the PA announcer said, "Started in 1934 by Little Tokyo businessmen, the 65th annual Nisei Week festival...."
Hmm, seems like the skipped a few years.
I read way more than I post, but I couldn't let that go by. Thanks to regs and especially Jon for making this the most informative and entertaining, if not scrappy site on the web.
I knew what the missing years were. But I was wondering if anyone else would.
Thanks 808 for pointing out the obvious. Sometimes you just read without thinking and I'm glad to have been reminded of the reason behind Bob's little nugget that I didn't really stop to think about.
Hope you have Ortiz' gem on Tivo, Bob.
It's not getting any better for the DBacks. They face Pedro Martinez tonight. The DBacks are starting Javier Vazquez.
Please let the Dodgers finish ahead of the DBacks.
People can say that the Dodgers made some bad personnel decisions this year, but the DBacks made ones that were downright idiotic and they were in first place in July!
Assuming that the Padres win the division, I will likely pull for them in the first round of the playoffs. Mainly out of spite. Too much scorn heaped on the NL West by the East Coast baseball elite.
It almost looks to me like a case of hit and run. Milton knows he is gone for the rest of the year, so he takes shots at a guy who has earned the respect he so much desires.
Just my opinion, and this from someone who has always liked Bradley.
But I'm like the member of a group that gets made of fun. You can only poke fun at the NL West if you're a fan of one of the five teams in it.
Last night's game was tragic. Houlton deserved better support and I agree with all the faux pas previously listed.
Bradley / Kent is very sad. I would predict an off-season trade of Izzy, Bradley, pitcher, prospect for a good (at least #3) starting pitcher. Robles would be transition with certain minor-league players targeted for call-up if something happens to him.
Brian Giles to replace Bradley.
I will not be in acceptance until at least after this weekend. If we lose two or get swept by Houston and fall 8 games out, I think I would be all but there. But I will have tickets to the Cubs and am taking my daughter and so I cannot consciously give-up until after that game.
Sad, sad days.
...going to San Francisco in mid September and San Diego at the end of that month to follow the bums thru the pennant race...
Different topic...the local papers gush over the young pitchers of the Angels and how Washburn is now expendable...I think Houlton has shown himself to be of that quality, but of course, he is a Dodger...
Probably a good time to enjoy the pitching stylings of Tim Stauffer or Pedro Astacio.
I personally think this has been overblown by the media, and that Milton is happy here (to the extent that he can be happy anywhere). I see him wear his LA uniform with a lot of pride, and I hope that he is not traded simply because this situation is irreparable.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.