Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Cleveland at Chicago, 5:05 p.m.
* * *
After Jeff Weaver has thrown 90 pitches in a game this season, opponents have gone 29 for 97 against him with five walks, three hit by pitch, six doubles and five home runs, for a .352 on-base percentage, .515 slugging percentage and .867 OPS. From pitches 1-90, opponents are only on-basing .275, slugging .419 and OPSing .694.
Jim Tracy might use these numbers to make his case for keeping Weaver. On the other hand, the same numbers might make an argument against Tracy himself. Sample size warnings do apply, but I'd certainly have had a tighter leash on Weaver than Tracy had this season.
* * *
The following is a chart that I hoped would make more sense than it ended up making, but I'm running it anyway. It shows how the Dodgers and their main pitchers did against each National League opponent, ranked from the best offense to the worst.
I had thought it might show that the Dodgers were building up false hopes about their pitching against weaker opponents. And while that's true in the case of San Francisco, for example, the performances against San Diego (surprisingly good offense) and Colorado (surprisingly the worst) muck up the works.
NL Opponent | 2005 Equivalent Runs | Dodger ERA | Weaver ERA | Lowe ERA | Penny ERA |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cincinnati | 730.5 | 4.94 | 5.40 | 3.95 | 0.00 |
Florida | 707.9 | 6.00 | 9.53 | 7.84 | 8.18 |
St. Louis | 689.3 | 6.82 | ---- | 6.30 | 8.38 |
San Diego | 681.8 | 2.49 | 0.55 | 0.88 | 3.00 |
Chicago | 675.8 | 4.67 | ---- | 3.68 | 3.95 |
Atlanta | 669.8 | 5.09 | 4.61 | 3.86 | ---- |
Philadelphia | 668.6 | 3.50 | ---- | 2.08 | 2.77 |
Arizona | 660.4 | 5.17 | 5.11 | 6.00 | 0.00 |
Los Angeles | 654.1 | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- |
Milwaukee | 649.5 | 4.25 | ---- | ---- | 8.44 |
New York | 643.9 | 4.75 | 8.25 | ---- | 3.00 |
Pittsburgh | 612.3 | 5.54 | 1.13 | 3.00 | ---- |
Houston | 611.8 | 2.98 | 1.93 | 2.25 | ---- |
Washington | 605.1 | 4.50 | 3.00 | ---- | 3.00 |
San Francisco | 585.3 | 3.95 | 5.40 | 3.04 | 2.82 |
Colorado | 570.5 | 5.11 | 5.06 | 3.00 | 4.18 |
Do note, however, that the Dodger offense is about average. But despite playing in Dodger Stadium, the team is 13th in ERA, ahead of only Arizona, Cincinnati and Colorado.
* * *
Despite reports in recent days that the Dodgers are about to break their team hit-by-pitch records both on offense and by the pitching staff, Bob Timmermann sends in the following corrections:
On offense, Timmermann says, the record is is 72 in 2003.
Kinkade 16
Lo Duca 10
Cora 10
Cabrera 10
Green 6
Beltre 5
Roberts 4
Jordan 4
Ross 2
McGriff 1
Burnitz 1
Coomer 1
Ward 1
Henderson 1
The team record for Dodger pitchers is 75, set in 2000. "Park and Dreifort each hit 12 that year and Hershiser hit 11 in 24 2/3 IP (!!!!)," Timmermann writes.
4+ ERA innings eaters can be had for a lot less than 9-10 mils.
Was just stunned to see that Hershiser was still pitching in 2000; hadn't recalled that at all. So I look up his page at baseball reference for fun, and see that it is sponsored by Dave Velazquez. Dave writes: "I've always admired The Bulldog. His scoreless innings streak (59 IP!) in 1988 was simply amazing. Along with my favorite position player ever (Don Mattingly), Orel may not be a HOF'er, but my respect for his game is at the highest level."
Do people agree that Orel Hershiser is not a Hall of Famer? Maybe I'm a total homer, but doesn't one season like Hershiser's 1988 get you into the Hall?
"No," Roger Maris said.
"Andruw Jones might be having the worst season ever for a player with 50 or more home runs. Using EqA adjusted for historical context, these are the lowest figures ever for 50-homer guys:
.305: Andruw Jones, 2005
.309: Sammy Sosa, 1999
.317: Greg Vaughn, 1998
.320: Sammy Sosa, 1998
.325: Roger Maris, 1961
Yes, that is Roger Maris on there. You shouldn't be too surprised. Most people long ago realized that Mickey Mantle had a better year than did Maris (Mantle's EqA that year was .369)."
First, one great season is not nearly enough to get one in the Hall of Fame. Pete Reiser and Norm Cash and Cy Seymour are on the outside looking in, and rightly so.
Second, most Dodger fans would be surprised that their memories conflict with the facts regarding Hershiser's 1988 season, which was outstanding but not historic in any way other than the streak and the postseason.
In fact, a strong argument can be made that Hershiser was not the best pitcher in the National League in 1988. His ERA was third-best in the NL, his ERA+ fourth-best.
Actually, 1988 wasn't really even close to being Hershiser's best season. (That would be 1985 -- 172 ERA+ compared to 148 in 1988.)
All the batters hit in 2003 were hit with a magic baseball that made them disappear.
It just took a while for Mike Kinkade to get the message.
So Weaver's OPS allowed is 1.113 before 90 pitches and only .867 after? He's actually better after 90 pitches? Am I reading this wrong? How does his ERA stay under 5 with numbers like these?
I'm not trying to downplay Orel's 1988 season, just trying to prevent any overglorification of it. I was 11 years old and it's a childhood memory I wouldn't trade for anything. But if we believe in cold, clear consideration of the facts without regard to emotion, then Orel's 1988 was not really as special as we'd like to remember. The last two months of his season certainly were, but not the season as a whole.
FWIW, Danny Jackson in 1988 either bested or tied Hershiser in wins, winning percentage, ERA, and complete games while pitching a comparable amount of innings. He just didn't get as much TV face time in October as Orel did.
On the other hand, that face time Orel got in 1988 is certainly one thing in his favor regarding Hall of Fame voters, who tend to put a lot of emphasis on October TV time. There are only a few pitchers in the HOF with careers demonstrably worse than Hershiser's, and many of those are there because they became famous in October. (i.e., Dizzy Dean, Catfish Hunter)
For me, Hershiser is one of those almost-but-not-quite Hall of Famers. I wouldn't vote for him, but it wouldn't be a disgrace to Cooperstown or anything if he got in.
And he can pick up three easy wins right off the bat.
Wasn't 1B open, and 2 outs?
I thought they came in seperate years though.
Stan from Tacoma
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/VLAN21985.htm
My other favorite sports team (UTEP basketball) just got put on a Wheaties box, too, so I guess I'll have to get that one also.
Sam, you might use this interesting factoid if you want to campaign for Orel's spot in the HOF: while his numbers from '85 shine, compared to the rest of the league he was actually best from 87-89, when he led NL hurlers each year in Win Shares. That puts him in a group with, among others, Steve Carlton, Bob Gibson, Greg Madux, Pedro Martinez. Koufax, by comparison, managed the feat only twice.
Check it out: http://tinyurl.com/d95o3
As Rob Neyer said, here: http://tinyurl.com/86d5m,
Orel's spot in history might seem different
to the average fan if he had bookended his '88 Cy Young with awards in '87 and '89 as well. Interesting.
43 I'd hate to think what a 10-year old box of bran would do to your innards, Marty.
I can't mention '82 anymore without thinking of Uncle Rico from Napolean Dynamite.
"It's like they lost their chemistry," patron Sarah Grady said
I don't know how feasible this is, since Frank McCourt probably wants to win soon--and this probably won't be possible with a rookie manager.
Assuming that the Bud Black rumors turn out to be true, I think a major plus is that the handling of the pitchers would improve tremendously.
Speaking of the offseason, and I've only been around DT since maybe March of this year, what happens around here during the off season? Occasional updates? Winter meeting updates? Closed til spring?
Bob Brenly would disagree with that statement.
If what I want to happen happens, it's party time. One of my favorite blogs may go out of business, however.
FWIW, Bill James went through the numbers and picked apart that decision in the Abstract (I think it was the '86). He concluded emphatically that pitching Niedenfeuer to Clark was the correct decision compared to the most obvious alternative: walking Clark and bringing in Jerry Reuss to pitch to van Slyke. Lasorda ever after regretted the decision. But James defended it on the grounds that it made sense based on the available objective evidence; "It just didn't work."
I had to look up Kieschnick's '05 numbers (there are none) to determine it would've been a slightly bad trade for the Dodgers.
But yeah, it's fun to read and it's nice to see the DT voices of reason are still around...
5.72 ERA in 56.2 IP, 13 HR, 26 BB, 34 K, but in a limited 46 ABs, .304/.407/543 with 3 HR. He also played for Corpus Christi, but those stats are negligible
I like Ock and Shaw.
Wait. Isn't Ockandshaw where Clill Binton is from.
I'm also surprised there were no comments from me. I must have been back on the opiates.
September 20, 1887
There didn't seem to be much interest in Maryland as Baltimore defeated Brooklyn 6-3 at Oriole Park in a game shortened to 6 ½ innings by darkness. The loss dropped Brooklyn to 55-66 for the season and the team was 34 ½ games behind the first place St. Louis Browns, who had clinched the American Association pennant.
Brooklyn manager Charlie Byrne started a rookie, Bert Cunningham, on the mound. Cunningham would join Baltimore in 1888 and would pitch in the majors until 1901. Cunningham pitched fairly well, but was betrayed by his defense as six Brooklyn errors made all of Baltimore's runs unearned.
Baltimore scored twice in the first and again in the second to make it 3-0. Brooklyn managed to tie the game up in the third, but Baltimore scored three times in the sixth and after Brooklyn failed to score in the seventh, umpire Jerry Sullivan called the game on account of darkness.
The teams didn't mind as both teams as Brooklyn had to head back home to play a game at home the next day. The game story in the Brooklyn told which ferry the team was taking the next day.
The box scores in the Brooklyn Eagle and New York Times didn't agree on how many hits each team had, reflecting the peculiar scoring rules of 1887. The Eagle gave Brooklyn four hits and Baltimore seven. The Times gave each team credit for nine hits. The discrepancy was due, for the most part, to a decision by baseball scorekeepers to credit batters with a hit and at bat for every walk. However, the Eagle only recorded hits made by batting the ball. Walks were still listed separately. Other papers of the era would talk about hits and "true hits".
Because walks were counted as hits, batting averages in the majors went way up. St. Louis outfielder Tip O'Neill had an American Association record single season batting average of .435. O'Neill also led the AA in home runs with 14 and RBI with 123 and slugged .691. Dan Brouthers led the NL with a .426 batting average. In 1888, O'Neill would lead the AA again in batting, but with only a .335 average.
Scoring was very high in this era. St. Louis led the majors with 1132 runs scored. Brooklyn scored 906 runs, fourth best in the league. However the team finished with a 60-74 record, 34 ½ games behind St. Louis and in sixth place.
Despite walks being counted as hits, Brooklyn's team batting average was just .261. And no regular hit better than shortstop Germany Smith, who batted .294.
1887 would be the least year in charge for Charlie Byrne. A new manager, Bill McGunnigle would take over and good times would be arriving in Brooklyn.
Thanks to the Brooklyn Eagle, New York Times, Retrosheet, and Baseball-Reference.com
Send some of those up here. Looking back, I wish I'd stayed out of a lot of those heated debates. We were all wrong in the end.
Now I'm just here to make people (or myself) laugh. I'm the court jester.
Dodger starters ERA: 4.45, 10th in NL
Dodger relievers ERA: 4.53, 11th in NL
against mark buerhle.
But not about Jeff Kent.
And I still think Lowe has worked out so far. We'll see how the next three years go.
Interesting Freudian typo on the last word there, Bob. Or good pun, one or the other. I'm surprised Plaschke hasn't come up with that one yet to describe McCourt.
Then again, that may be making unwarranted assumptions about his facility with language.
If you're Frank Robinson, what do you do?
After waking up that is...
"What the .... Challenge his bat. Didn't Guillen tell me it was corked?"
3B Aybar
SS Robles
2B Kent
1B Saenz
RF Cruz
LF Edwards
C Phillips
CF Werth
P Lowe
Someone should have given Frank Robinson the memo that your pitcher walking Omar Vizquel is a bad thing.
2B Counsell
RF Tracy
LF Gonzalez
1B Clark
3B Glaus
CF Green
SS Cintron
C Stinnett
P Vargas
There is a Vargas on Arizona, so it's understandable.
Giants 4, Nats 3 - Final.
Or maybe everybody is just eating dinner.
Uh, Go Blue! Yeah, that's it.
Do whatever it takes to make Tracy want to go elsewhere for next season!
The role made famous by Scott Spiezio and, latterly, Chone Figgins. Except that they're higher on the scrap meter.
Edwards looks pretty bad playing in the field
Lowe has absolutely no control, I guess the good Lowe is gone... :(
Yea
[/Tom Slick crowd]
Cleveland leads Chicago 5-3 in the 7th.
Perhaps I don't think Mike Edwards is very valuable at all. So it's not hard to be a "lot more valuable" than him.
Phillies are getting shut out in Atlanta and the Marlins are in extra innings in New York.
Or maybe Broxton.
Or maybe Schmoll.
WXRL-ExpectedWinsOverReplacementRelievers
wxrl 2002-04AVE 2005
Gagne 8.500 1.078
TEAM 16.665 4.832
Reliever WARP3
2004=21.8 WARP3 (gagne 7.0)
2005=8.5 WARP3 (gagne 1.0)
Bullpen ARP-Adjusted Runs Prevented
2002-04AVE=86.2 (gagne 32.9)
2005=-4.6 (gagne 2.8)
This year the bullpen was 11.833 wxrl, or 13.3 warp, or 90.8 apr worse than the last couple years. Thats an average of 11.4 wins lost this year due to the bullpen, eleven and a half wins. Gagne's absence accounts for an average of 47% of the decline.
Lets round that number DOWN to 11 wins, seing as how their are two weeks left in the season. All else being the same this season, but giving back our bullpen from recent years, the Dodger record would be 78-71 and on pace for a pace for a 85 win season.
If you were to compare that to Tracy's misques, i cant imagine that even tracy's most fervent critics(steve) would believe that tracy is more responsible that the bullpen for this years disaster, or even close. Rather than complaining about the rotation or offense as many have, most (about 2/3) of this years decline can be counted towards the bullpen. Considering all the injuries, i think the rotation and offense have been perfectly fine. Its the bullpen that is to blame
OVER?! It isn't over until WE say it is.
C'mon, we don't want the Naccarato Prophecy to be realized. Gotta beat the DBax.
Given that FJT has about 12 days to live, I'd say that conversation came a little bit late.
"If title gets out of reach, Tracy urges a fight for second"
Translation: I care more about my personal record than developing young players. Edwards, Phillips, Saenz, and Wilson Alvarez will play a lot. Choi, Antonio Perez, Kuo, and Broxton will rot on the bench/in the pen.
Tracy must have spent that 1% playoff share already.
35 is the alltime record.
After all, when Erickson finally gets released, he'll go back home to a stunning mansion on Lake Tahoe, where he'll spend the winter with his wife who is soon to appear in Playboy.
All we have to look forward to in a few weeks (in descending order) is 1)DT,2)over anxious posters trying to extrapolate irrelevant meanings from the Jacksonville Five's winter league stats, and 3)spending time with our families.
"We definitely have to bear in mind the fact that if you can't be first, then you want to be second," Tracy said of the Dodgers, who are two games out of second.
- LATimes
Check that: the source is Dodgers.com, not LATimes.
2 more outs for the Indians, Peralta on 1st
hahahah
btw, it's 20-1 rockies
He's got to be in the pen next year, as long as his bionic elbow holds up.
The NL record is 36 by Chicago over Louisville on 6/29/1887.
The AL record is 29 done by the Red Sox against St. Louis in 1950 and by the White Sox against Kansas City in 1955.
Since 1900, the NL high is 28.
Apparently, nobody remembered the RDGC for August 25.
That was the Dodgers alltime record for giving up runs in a game. They lost to the Cubs that day 28-5.
We really only have four guys-Perez and Penny have a way to go to be the pitchers they were two years ago, Lowe seems good for a couple of four game stretches each year and then there's Weaver. Or am I too pesimistic?
Some things jump out at me:
0 walks in 7 innings.
Jason Phillips and Olmedo Saenz are starting.
Justice-4 Tracy-1.
San Diego -55
San Francisco -83
Los Angeles -65
Arizona -176
Colorado -113
Dig that Aybar leather!
See.
Apparently the game is on the official MLB EI docket but my carrier has chosen not to carry it. Not that I blame them.
game over
ghame over
guame over
guome over
.the bull.
Pinch hit with Antonio Perez!
They've been better of late and have their ERA down to 5.90.
Now 2nd and 3rd one out.
Actually Uris has THREE errors today.
This is a very good sign. If only his power would come back.
As for finishing second Tracy, doesn't pinch hitting a quality hitter with two on and down 3 help that? Or am I missing a reason why Robles would be seen as our best bet there.
I could live with that next year. Broxton is throwing some serious heat here. 97mph on that last one.
Blowing away 7 of last 10 batters isn't too bad.
I wonder if he'll tell Tracy he cant go, and that he's hurting his free agency value by playing while he's hurt.
What the use in playing Saenz anymore? Or Edwards, Robles, and Phillips?
Texeria, Blalock, Soriano due up.
Is it just me, or does anyone else want to join a fantasy baseball team next year just to draft Sanchez, Kuo, Broxton, and Gagne? Even Grapefruit couldn't screw up a season with those guys in the pen right?
We need a nickname for that quartet. Or at least the latter three.
You mean guys like Garret Anderson, Bengie and Jose Molina, Frankie Rodriguez, Chone Figgins?
Eckstein
Erstad
Glaus
Salmon
Anderson
Fulmer
Kennedy
Molina
5
why? he hit .338/.399/.561 in AAA this year to go along with GG defense at 1b.
Adrian Gonzales has been a gigantic bust considering he was the #1 overall pick.
With the Giants down by only 5, if the Giants can shave off one more game before they meet the Pads, it is not out of the realm of possibility in this bizarre season that the Dodgers could actually help the Giants tie the Padres.
Although I like the KGB
So, NL West teams have now been collectively outscored by 491 runs this year. And somehow they've done it while frequently playing each other!
Based on their runs scored and against, expected records are:
SD 69 81, six games worse than their actual record
SF 66 84, four games worse than their actual record
LA 68 82, one game better than their actual record
AZ 58 93, ten games worse than their actual record(!)
COL 64 86, two games better than their actual record
Apparently, the pythagorean NL West race is more exciting than the actual NL West race.
Expected standings:
Games back
SD: -
LA: 1
SF: 3
COL: 5
AZ: 11 1/2
The Dodgers can still win this race!
Don't get too excited, now.
no, the comp is for 1b who play solid defense, both have sweet line drive left handed swings, and have long slender bodies that have not filled out yet. Gonzalez who has now begun to fill out, has now hit with power... like he was projected too.
if it wasnt for tiexera, gonzalez would be a fulltime mlb 1b already.
I don't think it's happened in our lifetimes.
2004 - Dodgers and Giants battle to the end
2003 - Giants beat Dodgers by 15 1/2
2002 - Giants beat out Dodgers (and others) for wild card
2001 - Dodgers eliminate Giants from wild card
2000 - Giants win by 11
1999 - Both teams stink (Dodgers affect another race)
1998 - No effect
1997 - No comment
1996 - No Giants
1995 - Dodgers battle the Rockies
1994 - Strike
1993 - Take that Giants!
1992 - No comment
1991 - Giants knock out Dodgers
1990 - Reds lead wire to wire
1989 - Dodgers try to spoil Giants, but Padres lose anyway
1988 - YAA
1987 - Dodgers stink too much to make a difference
1982 - Ugh
Going back further, it seems that when the Giants won, usually the Dodgers were in contention with the Giants at the same time.
When the Giants won in 1936 and 1937, the Giants won without much help from others.
On a sidenote I will say a prayer for little Dionner Navarro tonight. Having had my daughter spend the first 5 days of her life in the neo natal intensive care unit, I can feel for what he is going through. But our little one never experienced anything as bad as feeding tubes. Get well soon!! vr, Xei
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.