Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
We have live footage.
* * *
Curious: Do those who complained that the Dodgers did not retain enough players from the 2004 National League West champions want your next general manager to:
a) move to reacquire those Dodgers who were let go?
b) keep the Dodgers you currently have (because they are Dodgers now)?
c) consider all bets off and be willing to give or get anyone?
* * *
Toastermate Alex Belth of Bronx Banter passes along the news that "a statue of Pee Wee Reese with his arm around Jackie Robinson was unveiled yesterday in Brooklyn commemorating one of baseball's most touching moments." Ira Berkow of the New York Times has a story, accompanied by a picture of the statue with Rachel Robinson and Dottie Reese in front.
* * *
Contrary to appearances, Cesar Izturis statistically had a better fielding season in his injury-curtailed 2005 statistically than in 2004, writes Clay Davenport of Baseball Prospectus.
* * *
Update: The interview is two years old, but here are a couple of quotes that Dodger assistant general manager Kim Ng gave to Jonah Keri of Baseball Prospectus:
You can't go in there and tear a team apart. The Dodgers were built on pitching and defense. The Yankees were pretty well-balanced. There are a lot of different ways to build a club. To come in and say, 'I will do XYZ by doing ABC,' you're probably going to hurt yourself in the end.
I can say that I am a proponent of being strong up the middle offensively. It's something I saw with the Yankees having such great success, something I believe in. How you build a team also depends on the ballpark. In Dodger Stadium it's difficult to hit home runs, so you have to adjust to that. The people in place, ballpark factors, there's a wide variety of factors that differ with each organization. But a lot of the emphasis I would put would be on scouting and player development. Financial flexibility is the way to succeed, and having great scouting and player development is the best way to achieve that flexibility.
And ...
The relationship you have with the media is important to any organization, and you can run into problems if you don't maintain a good one. How you handle it depends on the personality of the person. You have to be open and up-front. But if the information you have, if sharing it has a chance of hurting your deal, you'd just as soon it not get out.
At the time, Ng indicated that Yankee general manager Brian Cashman was a great influence on her. Ng worked under Cashman for four years.
At this point, it looks like Ng/Hershiser/(Lasorda), or Gilbert/Ng. I guess neither of those would be disasterous, especially if Lasorda kept himself out of the picture
Maybe being a Dodger fan has caused you to develop a taste for four-letter words.
1st and 10 is on around 1:00 or 2;00. I know it is in the early afternoon. I just tIVO it! It shows all of the 1st and 10 that is shown on cold pizza in the morning but you do not have to wait through all of the junk on Cold Pizza.
Unless the McCourts truly have something clever up their sleeves, or are extraordinarily lucky, they are following the idiotic decisions of the 49ers a couple of years ago: do not fire someone who's taken your team to the playoffs without having already decided on (and come to relative terms with) their higher-profile replacement.
If the McCourts are reduced to having some sort of Ng/Hershiser front-office, that's arguably the best case scenario for us (I don't think Theo is a realistic option). But it's really exactly the same sort of move McCourt made when he signed DePo, which makes the firing even more pointless.
But I agree, an Ng/Hershiser combo is probably the best we can hope for at this point.
By the by, how does Dennis Gilbert's resume mesh with McCourt's stated desire for an "experienced" GM? Of the alleged candidates currently being whispered about, only Bowden (gulp) and Epstein seem to fit that requirement.
Shouldn't we know better than to take McCourt on his word?
- John Hart would be a very solid choice imho; he did good things in Cleveland, and mistakes he's since made are no worse than those mistakes made by other well-regarded GMs
- Kim Ng would also be a good choice, good for PR, good for the team (because she knows it so well) and people like her, a progressive move. But would McCourt and Lasorda trust her and stay out of her way, would they respect her? Hard to picture that, unless Lasorda comes to his senses and stays the heck out of everyone's way for once. (Yeah, right.)
- Gilbert would be a dull move that smacks of desperation.
- Bobby V as manager wouldn't kill me but Lasorda's dream of Bobby V as GM/manager would.
Theo's not coming, or I'll be very happily shocked if he is at any rate - as stated above and in the Times, if he's good friends with DePo, why on Earth would he take this mess on? But stranger things have happened I suppose.
If the Dodgers are his most attractive offer, he should probably take the job. I don't think there would be any hard feelings between them (Depo and Theo) if he does. They are both smart guys and should know how to separate business and friendship.
It's not like Depo would get his job back if theo refuses to take it.
Since they're the only team left, if I were Theo I'd just wait a year and see what opens up.
That's the thing...what else could open up? LA has psycho owners, but the farm system is stocked, the roster has flexibility, the city is dying for a winner. It's a pretty good job if Theo can use his leverage as a hot commodity to come in on his own terms.
San Diego is the one job that worries me the most, but that job sounds like it'll be open this year, not next.
As much as I want Theo, I'm thinking Bowden comes on (bleech) as GM, Ng is his asst., and Orel is in the dugout.
I agree McCourt looks in over his head, and scare like he knows we can see it. Maybe he/they will think about selling while the selling is good.
Hey a man can dream, can't he? (maybe this is the Delusional phase)
Somebody said somewhere that as AGM she oversaw the farm system before Collins was hired because she didn't have much player-development experience and wanted to get some. That's admirable.
How much experience does she have in this area now? This would seem to be the area that is most critical to the Dodgers right now; we need a GM who can decide which of the Jacksonville prospects are the keepers and which we trade for more-developed veterans. After all, isn't it unlikely that all six will be promoted to the big club at the same time? If so, some will be going. Who? And who do we try to trade them for? These are the most important questions, in my mind, that will affect the Dodgers for the next five to ten years.
I believe all the reports that Ng has a brilliant mind when it comes to the business of baseball -- everyone says she knows the ins and outs of the CBA. I'd bet that ability would translate well to the kind of analysis required of free agent acquisitions.
Here's my other question: even if Ng is the best candidate, why the hell would she stick around to train Hershiser at the job? I've had to train my replacement, and believe me, it sucks. I wanted no part of it, but I had to leave on good terms and I knew that there would only be a few days of that experience. I can't imagine being a lame duck from moment one.
Sorry for the long post.
Other then making the following Fred Claire/Pedro/Delino like trades he's done a great job:
1. Traded Brian Giles for Juan Rincon-possibly the worse trade in the AL in the last 25 years
2. Traded Sean Casey for Burba
3. Traded Richie Sexson for Bob Wickman and fluff
4. Traded Travis Hafner for Einar Diaz and Ryan Drese
5. Traded Jeff Kent who was just starting his offensive run to the Giants for the downsloping Matt Williams. Of course I do need to give him credit for trading Baerga for Kent in the 1st place. To bad for the Inidans he didn't stop there.
He doesn't seem to like slugging 1st baseman(not counting Casey as a slugging 1st baseman) and does seem to love to trade them for worthless pieces. Really those 4 trades are so lopsided I can't imagine how the man continues to have a job. How these trades turned were not surprises. They were bad deals when they were made and some become historically bad as time went on.
On the plus side he seems to mentor great assistants and was generally credited with starting the trend signing his young starts to contracts taking them out of the aribtration years.
I'm so depressed by these recent events that I can only follow in detached bemusement, or at least pretend to.
If I'm wrong I'll gladly treat the DT group to a beer at the next DT group Dodger game.
At the time, the Indians were the model of how to run a franchise from developing within and bringing in supplemental pieces, a model that was copied (sorta) by the late 90s Yankees.
1)Why would Ng take a job just to teach someone else (Hershiser) the ropes? Who is there to teach her as a first time GM the ropes?
2)What exactly IS her player personnel philosophy?
3)Why is she more qualified than any other potential internal candidate?
4)Why would she get a media pass for being inexperienced? Why would she be considered more media friendly than her predecessors?
Krikorian (with McDonnell) pumped Gilbert for the GM job last time. Must be a lot of free meals at his favorite Long Beach restaurant at stake.
I thought Kevin Malone was a spectacular hiring at the time. I guess I've learned my lesson, because both Bowden and Hart scare the bejeezus out of me.
Oh, the gnashing of teeth from the MSM then!
Given the insanity of the McCourts, this is the only scenario that seems comforting and realistic. Epstein seems like a longshot at best.
Part of me wants to see the Dodgers take a calamitous fall, with McCourt going bankrupt. And Tommy can go to the great Giant in the underworld.
No it isn't. All manager searches must include a minority. Not GMs.
-------
Really, there's only one solution that makes sense at this point. Three simple steps:
1. Give Plaschke the GM job.
2. Give DePodesta a daily column in the LAT.
3. Buy popcorn.
After firing DePodesta, how do you know that McCourt wants to continue using a sabre-friendly approach to Player Personnel?
Absent any info as to her approach and philosophy, there is no way of knowing what her approach would be.
Of course, Karros then went off on the "unbelievably bad" contracts that DePo handed out, so....
That's it. This is it. I'm done. Through. It's over. I'm gone. Finished. Over. I will never work for you again. Look at you.
[laughing] You think you're an important man? Is that what you think? You are a laughingstock. You are a joke. These people are laughing at you. You're nothing! You have no brains, no ability, nothing! [knocking object over on desk] I quit.
---
LEVITAN: Am I crazy, or didn't you quit?
GEORGE: When?
LEVITAN: Friday.
GEORGE: Oh, what? What? That? Are you kidding? I didn't quit. What? You took that seriously?
LEVITAN: You mean, laughingstock? All that stuff?
GEORGE: Come on. Will you stop it.
LEVITAN: No brains? No ability?
GEORGE: Teasing.
LEVITAN: Okay. I want you outta here.
If you read my whole post I did give Hart credit for signing all the young players that you mentioned. In fact right after he signed Manny and the kids if he had retired then he would have been considered a brilliant GM. Unfortunately for Indian fans he didn't and gutted the future while not helping the present and not one thing other then Wickman remains from his destruction.
Do you know how many times Giles/Sexson/Hafner/Kent have been in the top 10 in MVP voting since they were traded? No other GM in baseball has that legacy.
(Of course, he wouldn't if Karros had played at Stanford instead of UCLA)
Your right, that is what one of the local papers reported several days ago. It is possible they got confused with the manager search but they mentioned the GM search not the manager search. They also stated that the team that is doing a search for a new GM must submit the list to the commissioner's office.
There is no info out there that Ng is a proponent of sabremetrics. Even if there were:
Why would a brand new, inexperienced GM employ the same philosophy that just got her predecessor fired?
Okay, phew, moving on. I know pretty much nothing about Kim Ng but at this point in the GM race that doesn't seem like a bad thing. And imagine how bad the Plaschkes of the world will freak out with a GIRL running the team.
My complaint was never with Depo for removing those players from the rosters. I was bummed that we could not afford Beltre, but very happy that Finley was let go, as it was obvious that his defensive skill at CF was much worse then MB who he replaced. My complaint was with how he spent what I thought was silly money (agree with Karros, flog me now) on Lowe, JD Drew, O Perez and extended Gagne and Izzy. I expected a GM like Depo to do the opposite and was surprised he acted like every other GM who has ever had the job. Other then trading LaDuca in the middle of the pennant race he did nothing that showed him to be different from any other GM. Nonetheless I was very excited about what he'd do this winter and I am bummed that I'll never find out if he had what it took to stand out from the mediocrity that pervades baseball. Must be harder then I think.
http://tinyurl.com/mpbs
As for Izturis, who else would you have play short. Antonio Perez was already written into a platoon role, and the market for shortstops was already ridiculous. Who do you put there?
Trading prospects for veterans can look very bad in the long run, but if it helps you win short term, it can be considered a calculated risk.
Why do I think that Kim Ng and Tommy Lasorda wouldn't mix well? I can picture Lasorda being extremely condescending.
At the pace things are going, even Dennis Gilbert as GM would be better than the presumptive frontrunner Bowden.
I agree with you that DePo is more conventional a GM than many people think.
---
I've added some small Kim Ng background in an update up top.
Ng worked under Evans and I don't know what Evans' approach to building a winning team, but I think it's a pretty big compliment to her that she worked under two GMs who - judging by the player turnover - had completely different visions of a baseball team.
If we don't land Epstien (and I doubt that we would) I'd rather have Ng than any other rumored GM. However, it seems to me that the fact that she's not a "big name" might hurt her more than her work with DePodesta.
It's hard to get hits, but not necessarily home runs.
1. There were no viable (or cheap) replacements at the time the extension was signed. You can probably make an argument for Perez, but I think that's about it. Maybe add Robles into the mix.
2. The market for shortstops is downright scary. When Renteria, Rollins, and Cabrera are all making 8+ million a year, Izturis is a relative bargain.
Paying Izturis $3 million a year didn't and won't cripple the team.
Luckily, Karros is now on the record talking about McCourt's dysfunction. One criteria for becoming Dodger general manager is geek love for all McCourts. They are 'the brand.' They stand for 'excellence,' and they 'won't settle for anything less!'
If the McCourts think DePodesta told Theo Epstein 'lies' that would reflect anything but the lambent glow of their aura of success, they probably won't even talk to him. Their egos can't take it.
It's not for nothing that Lasorda had to debase himself in the presence of T.J. Simers. The new Dodger GM will have to be able to say, with a straight face, things like: "Hook me to a lie detector. I'll bet my lungs I'm telling the truth. I love Frank and Jamie McCourt. Set up a lie detector, and when I pass, you apologize to them for challenging my loyalty and love for them." This is the only thing the McCourts can tolerate from the people around them.
http://underdog.typepad.com/
That is true the bullpen was not very good without Gagne but to be honest I expect a sharp GM to be able to build a great bullpen at a moderate cost while shipping out the overpaid closer to cover harder to fill holes.
I'm probably wrong about Izzy who does have a reasonable contract at the moment and your right we had no in house replacements for him. Just seemed that we could have made a big haul by trading a gold glove SS coming off an offensive year whose upside at most is Vizquel but could just as easily become Juan Castro. I just don't think it would have taken much to replace Izzy and we would have been stronger with what we got in return for him. As it turns out it was fairly easy to replace him with Robles. Not that Robles is anything special but neither is Izzy.
However none of this matters anymore. My GM didn't do what I expected but he did enough that I wanted him to finish what his plan was.
I won't have such high hopes for our next GM. At most I hope he doesn't destroy the team and I'll no longer have the smugness that we had the smartest GM in baseball that I carried around with me after the end of 2004.
Candidate #1 - My team's bats smell like pine tar!
Other than her job survival skills, what else do we know about her?
What are her beliefs in Player Personnel?
What does she value in players?
Have you ever heard her interviewed on any subject?
How do we know she can communicate with staff and the media?
Who's style does she prefer, Brian Cashman? Evans? DePodesta?
When a report asked specifically at the presser if the Dodgers had contacted him, ESPN News cut away so I didnt hear his answer.
But ESPN only had two captions under Epstein. One was just stating why he was hold the press conference. The other was about the Dodgers contacting him.
I think he's Frank McCourts to lose at this point.
In addition, Epstein made clear that this move was not 'a surprise to either side'. And that each side knew for at least 2 weeks where the other stood.
I'm going to continue to believe that McCourt knew Epstein wasnt going back to Boston,and thus fired DePo.
That is good news since it means he sounds interested in working next year instead of taking a year off. My hope % just soared into the 25% range from 1%.
It's in overpaying for guys like Mesa, Wickman (who was fantastic this year but may not be again), a declining Percival that I think the saber types try to stay away from.
You've been telling us that since day one. If your right, I'd like to buy you two beers at the next DT Dodger day.
But things are brightening up I think. Its just too bad we'll have to wait until next week to find out officially.
I'm just wondering if the McCourts will interview any other candidates in between that time?
Even so, I don't think it's gonna happen.
It would explain why McCourt has kept his candidate list confidential.
Listening to Theo, he does appear to have something that DePosdesta never showed to the media and public, a personality.
As for the Dodgers, I am sure that Kim Ng and Roy Smith can handle the meetings, when was the last time anything happened at these meetings, they can't sign anyone for another week.
We shall see.
Who are the saber-friendly GMs your referring to that spend money on top notch closers other then Theo where it was only possible because he had a 120 million dollar budget? It is possible there are more saber-friendly GMs then I know about. Beane never did, he let Isringhausen and Foulke go as soon as they got expensive without missing a beat. Riccardi brought in Batista from the rotation and has never spent money on a top notch closer. Hunsicker traded Wagner before he could walk. Only Theo has really spent money on a closer (Foulke) until Depodesta gave Gagne that extension. It may have been the right thing to do, I was just surprised he did it.
Where do you live?
ron cey (among others) comes in a close second.
I'm just saying that the crazy scenarios that bring Theo to L.A. explain one part of the process that's been confusing.
81. I agree Theo Epstein does have better media presence. I also think that if he was going to take a year off and do 'social work' like Peter Gammons speculated, he would have said it bluntly in his press conference. But he didnt say that. It really seems like he wants to work next year.
I don't think signing Gagne was a bad thing. Gagne's not like other closers. Other closers don't bring fans the game, or keep them there until the 9th inning, adding concession sales, or bring in revenue through t-shirts and other memorobilia. I wish someone had the numbers for how much he contributes because I don't, but I'd guess that he pays for a fair chunk of his salary.
I understand that we could get a lot from him through a trade, but DePo said after re-signing Gagne, "Lots of people pitch the 9th inning, but Eric Gagne is a closer." That reads into his philosophy on closers. In Oakland they used a revolving door, but Gagne is a true bullpen ace, and they're hard to come by. Plus given DePo's propensity to trade/let go of other LA "heroes," I don't think it was a bad idea to keep the one who was actually as valuable as general consensus thought, pepper injury aside.
Ng was polite and deftly avoided getting into the "Chinese" questions. If you have Scully's stature, you can get away with that.
Of course, Depo and Theo had the budget to do so, and Beane had traditionally let them go and mined new ones from the scrap heap. The Dotel acquisition last year smacked of desperation as he hadn't been able to find a reliable one.
If you're right and I was old enough, I'd buy you like 10 six-packs of beers at the next DT Dodger Day. Okay maybe not that much beer.
When will Gold Gloves in the NL be announced?
There's your answer on Kim Ng and stats.
"My assumption has always been that Dodger did in fact notably reduce home run numbers; that's plainly not the case."
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=2678
"In the past, I've theorized that Dodger Stadium was a better park for fly ball pitchers because it reduces the number of doubles hit. That appears to be absolutely wrong, as while it does reduce the number of doubles on fly balls it does so by turning them into home runs; for the number of fly balls that become doubles, triples, and home runs combined Dodger Stadium has been neutral. By turning extra fly balls into home runs, Dodger Stadium increases the run value of a fly ball."
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/an-in-depth-look-at-dodger-stadiums-effects/
Like you noted, I can only imagine Lasorda trying to communicate with her.
Player, Team 2005 2004-05 Career
Rafael Furcal, Atl 114-41-20 109-64-24 103-130-22
*Cesar Izturis, LA 109-24-9 103-46-8 102-86-9
Neifi Perez, Chi 115-35-18 112-48-21 109-243-92
Omar Vizquel, SF 108-32-11 104-52-10 102-401-54
Jack Wilson, Pit 111-38-16 109-72-28 105-132-32
Izturis is another one who followed up his GG season with an even better statistical performance, but still isn't among the very top guys in the league. Furcal had a great year, but he's never done anything remotely like this before. Vizquel has a long and distinguished career, even if the stats don't make him the second coming of Ozzie Smith, and had a good year. Jack Wilson, poor guy, is stuck in Pittsburgh and can't attract the attention that GG typically requires. Neifi Perez, for all of his faults, is a terrific defensive shortstop, and did win the GG back in 2000. I think he should get it this year, but everybody has a viable case.
The stats are Rate/FRAR/FRAA (fielding runs above replacement/average)
I mean, hey, man, you don't talk to McCourt. You listen to him. The man's enlarged my mind. He's a poet-warrior in the classic sense. I mean sometimes he'll, uh, well, you'll say hello to him, right? And he'll just walk right by you, and he won't even notice you. And suddenly he'll grab you, and he'll throw you in a corner, and he'll say do you know that "if" is the middle word in life? If you can keep your head when all about you are losing theirs and blaming it on you, if you can trust yourself when all men doubt you -- I mean I'm no, I can't -- I'm a little man, I'm a little man, he's, he's a great man. I should have been a pair of ragged claws
scuttling across floors of silent seas -- I mean --
Anyone know when the NL GG's will be announced?
Might as well go all out... the reason they listed the stats the way they did is:
"Since the awards are as much about reputation as performance, and since a reputation usually takes time to acquire, we'll break the stats out into 2005 only, 2004 and 2005 combined, and career."
106 - today, I expect.
The 49ers and Pistons have been alluded to recently. First, it was the Niners knee jerk firing of Mariucci (with Bill Walsh or Terry Donahue playing the role of Tommy Lasorda?) without a strong plan for replacing him. Dennis Erickson = Jim Bowden here.
However, if the "Theo Theory" comes to fruition, suddenly its the Pistons firing successful but controversial coach Rick Carlisle, and replacing...upgrading...to Larry Brown that is the more accurate comparison.
As a Niners fan, I hope and pray for the latter.
Here's mine:
C Mike Matheny
1B Derrek Lee
2B Luis Castillo
SS Rafael Furcal (unfortunately)
3B David Wright
OF Jim Edmonds
OF Andruw Jones
OF Jason Bay (can't think of anyone else)...maybe Carlos Beltran
I think that is a great question to ask. This has been on my mind lately. Theo is probably more widely respected, largely because of his ring. He might be better than Depo at dealing with the media as well.
As far as running a team I haven't seen any evidence that makes Theo better than Depo.
I like the way Depo quickly turned the dodgers from a scrappy, small ball, Pitching and defense club to one that was molded more to his liking. Theo never really had to take such drastic measures with the bosox.
But in the end we are all rooting for Theo to get the job not because he is better than depo, but because he is better than the other options out there. Even when stripped of the hype.
Epstein: shoot
McCourt: Who's our Papi?
Isn't a fundamental requirement of a GM to be that face of the franchise, to have as much college football coach recruiter-type in him as he does in the statistically oriented decision making skills?
Tallying up the good and bad moves I do think DePo looks better. Epstein's version of THE TRADE netted far less talent than DePo's. But in this world "winning the big one" goes a lot further than "achieving a net gain of talent while preserving your core prospects."
I don't think many GMs are all that visible if they are in small markets. I don't have the slightest clue what Dave Littlefield looks like. Or what JP Ricciardi looks like. I doubt I could even identify Brian Sabean.
And it's not like I don't watch or read much about baseball.
Then again, that perceived credibility is the "hype" that Jon is asking us to remove from the argument. If this were a final on an exam, I'd have a big red comment asking if I really read the question.
I still think that letting Depo go was a bad move, and I would've liked to have seen his vision come to reality. However, if McCourt let him go because he thought Theo was the man he wanted, I'll give him that.
I'm not looking to excuse Theo for making the deal.. just wondering if there were other influences.
Whoah. So what was the Gillick approach, just a head-fake? If Gillick had said yes, there would be no discussion of Theo. If Tommy had convinced McCourt to fire DePo a week before he did, Gillick would've been locked up by now. The fact that they didn't even know Gillick was this close to being hired by Philly proves to me that McCourt entered into this venture with not enough information to even develop a plan.
We might end up with Theo Epstein. But from watching that press conference video, the idea that McCourt had what you and I would call a "plan" just gives McCourt way too much credit.
Here's a "plan": Jim Tracy reached a point of certainty that the Pirates' job was open, and was his for the asking. By firing McClendon when they did, the Pirates sent him the signal he was told to expect by third parties (so no tampering could be alleged). Armed with that knowledge, he went to DePo and demanded a raise and an extension, knowing he couldn't lose either way. That's a "plan."
Renteria is actually my pet project. A large percentage of people in Boston HATE Renteria. Part of it is that he replaced Cabrera, part of it is that he's overpaid. Of course he's overpaid, nobody's arguing that...but he performed pretty much in line with his career averages, with the exception of his strange rise in his error totals. I think Boston fans were expecting Miguel Tejada, when it was just silly to think that. So it really irritates me when I have to listen to everyone constantly bashing him, even though I never cared one way or the other about him before.
Where is our "Jerry West"?
bhsportsguy
That said, for the team's sake, I'd rather have Theo than most of the other candidates mentioned.
At this point, were just trying to avoid our "Mitch Kupchak." :)
Maybe Jamie is trying to play the Lucchino role. Maybe that explains the constant "renovations" to Dodger Stadium.
Problem is, the Red Sox have a lot more money and marketing savvy to go about doing it, not to mention baseball experience. The McCourts just come off as clueless.
You hit that one right on the head. I'm a Red Sox fan, and I did not want Renteria even before he had signed here and it was just a rumor or a thought. I took crap all season long about Renteria, and am continuing to take crap about how he is still capable of putting together great seasons. Show me one great season besides 2003, and I'll show you Renteria's next good year. The general perception in Boston is that Renteria is eventually just going to bust out the whooping stick while consuming every ball hit his way defensively. You know, because that matches his Established Performance Level.
I'm with you. I'm not saying it was the plan, or that anything is obvious right now.
Speculation on my part, that Depo was fired because McCourt had knowledge that Theo would be available and had interest in coming here. That would be a helluva plan.
Ultimately that's why I still get the feeling that Theo goes to SD, or that he becomes a social worker, or that he grows out his hair and puts out an album (Bill Simmons' theory). I think it's a stretch that they could conceive of, and execute on a plan like that.
But it's either believe that Theo is destined for LA, or resign to the fact that it'll be the Tommy/Jimmy/Bobby show running LA.
DePodesta might have more raw intelligence than any GM currently employed, but Epstein comes awfully close. Epstein seems, from outside appearances, to be someone who brings more of his own "heart and soul" to the job, whose instincts and intuitions are sounder, who has better people skills.
In Lucchino, Epstein had a mentor who taught him a lot about life, business and baseball from a grown-up perspective. With a mentor like that, eventually you have to move on, and that's what Theo has wisely done.
DePodesta's so-called mentor, Billy Beane, was more of a peer, and is himself a work in progress. As Moneyball demonstrated, Beane was a neurotic. DePo lacked the self-knowledge to understand that the Dodger situation was probably not a good one for him, given the new ownership, and the fact that McCourt himself was going to be flailing.
Theo's been through much more hard gravel, so he'd come here looking at McCourt with a more jaundiced eye. Despite his youth, Epstein can speak to McCourt from a position of far more authority than DePo ever could. He's won more rings than McCourt. He's won more rings than Bobby Valentine. He's halfway to Lasorda's total. That's going to be a helpful factor.
Finally, the most unmeasurable difference between them is also the most apparent. Paul DePodesta was, sadly, unlucky. A dark cloud followed too many of his personnel moves. Theo Epstein is lucky. We could some of that luck in LA.
http://tinyurl.com/d3mwb
I still think that letting Depo go was a bad move, and I would've liked to have seen his vision come to reality.
I too would have liked to see his vision come to reality. But, I do not believe that he had the skills to pull it off.
Even though Epstein has a similar philosophy as DePodesta he is a different person who has his own set of skills. They are not clones.
2002- 116 OPS+ (age 26)
2003- 131 OPS+ (.330, 61 XBH)
2004- 90 OPS+ (.287, 47 XBH)
AVG- 112 OPS+
Going into his 29-32 yr old seasons you could reasonably expect a 115 type player. Nomar was a 121 and 118 his last 2 years in Boston at age 29/30. Renteria's glove is rated league avg. by BPro, better than a 31 yr old Nomar. $10M is a bit pricey and you wouldn't do it again, but it does comp out with Cabrera and Rollins.
And yes, while I would give credit to the McCourts if the plan all along was to get Theo, I still would not give them any pass. If they weathered the criticism a little longer they would have been vindicated. Now very few people have respect for them. I don't.
They are similar talents and it seems to me that you keep the one who helped you win the Division, Pennant and WS.
http://tinyurl.com/86kfw
http://tinyurl.com/7tjga
Guess they assume another 1,200 DL days for next year.
'The Los Angeles Dodgers had contacted him, as well, but Gillick felt that the Phils were much closer to achieving success.
"I think the Phillies are further along at the major league level at this point," said Gillick.'
Unless, of course, we're re-building. Let's hope we tell him, "tough."
gillick doesnt have much time yet, he wants a winner before his time is up.
as for the theo theory. i want to believe it and i want it to come true! i mean, if the narccato prophecy can come true, the theo theory can come true!
1) Larry Lucchino said to do it, so Epstein did it.
2) Epstein recognized that Renteria was superior to Cabrera, knew that 2003 (and to a lesser extent 2002) was a wild statistical outlier, but also recognized that the Red Sox had the coin to overpay for a better product.
3) In a shocking violation of all things sabremetric, Epstein (a) keyed in on Renteria's one outstanding year (and one good year); (b) disregarded six complete major league seasons of an OPS+ below 100; (c) thought that was representative of Edgar's true talent level; and (d) paid him accordingly.
We'll never know, but it obviously makes a huge difference when we're thinking about whether we'd want him running our team.
158 - I've never asked God for anything Dodgers-related but I'm thinking of asking for Theo Epstein. Because the thought of the other options gives me nightmares.
Saber-optimal, and market realities will always conflict. Thus evaluating a GM on pure sabermetric grounds tells only part of the story, and part of what will distinguish one saber-GM from another is how well they make those calls. And they'll all make mistakes.
C - Lieberthal - Navarro - Phillies Short Term
1b - Thome/Howard - Choi/? - Phillies although Howard was given the opportunity to play everyday despite horrible platoon numbers
2b - Utley - Kent - not even but not horrible
SS - Rollins - Robles/Izzy - Phils
3b - Bell - Aybar/Perez - I like our combo because Bell isn't worth 4.5.
LF - Burrell - Werth - Phils
CF - Lofton - Drew/Bradley - if Drew is healthy, LA
RF - Abreau - ? - Phils
SP - Lots of injuries and question marks but the Dodgers have a better chance of being best in their division.
RP - If Wagner resigns - Phils until we see how Gagne is in Spring training
Manager - Phils have one, we don't.
Minors - with Howard and Utley, best players are up already, Dodgers best may be a year away.
So, the Phils maybe closer but they have Atlanta, Mets and Florida to deal with. If the Mets get Manny and Furcal, well....
bhsportsguy
Tim(LA, CA): what do you think of the Dodgers firing DePodesta? Personally, I like it. How does a GM choose Drew over Beltre? Beltre made it clear he wanted to be a Dodger and the money he got from Seattle wasn't that much more than whet Drew got.
Rob Neyer: (4:09 PM ET ) Uh, Tim? Tim, are you there? Did you happen to notice Beltre's numbers with the Mariners this year?
So is 1200 DL-days an actual count or just a number you threw out there? Sadly, it's actually...plausible.
We'll never know, but it obviously makes a huge difference when we're thinking about whether we'd want him running our team.
That's my point. I never understood why he did that.
Zach ( San Diego): Signing Beltre would have been just as stupid as signing Drew. DePodesta would have been wrong either way. Have you ever been critical of a "moneyball" guy? Did you question the Lowes signing( I think you did)? Afterall, you did pick them to win the West.
Rob Neyer: (4:18 PM ET ) I did question the signing of Lowe, and I did pick the Dodgers to win the West. And they might have, if not for the injuries that knocked out J.D. Drew, Milton Bradley, and Eric Gagne. I'm not saying DePodesta had a great year; he probably did not. But this team was exceptionally unlucky, and I think firing DePo was foolish.
"...I'm not saying DePodesta had a great year; he probably did not. But this team was exceptionally unlucky, and I think firing DePo was foolish."
Now what's Theo's email? Maybe we can "persuade" him to take the Dodgers job.
This I can answer. Nope, nobody, at least not at AAA. They do have Hanley Ramirez at AA, but he didn't have a great year.
I love the Dodgers, was born in Brooklyn and moved here before they did. But they are a PR fiasco right now. They need to get in the face of the media and let their fans know what they are doing! It feels if as they have no sense of urgency and yet as fans without a GM or Manager it feels like a rudderless ship. Who will rep them at meetings next week? Who is an agent or another team suppose to call??? Who is taking control? Is Tommy involved? Is is Kim Ng??? Keep us informed!
Answer to your question. Seems unlikely & improbable to pursue horses that have gotten out of the barn but wouldn't a Beltre-Isturis-Cora-Kent infield be both a defensive and offensive upgrade?
uhhh, thats a good thing.
Explain please...
Theo may have thought Renteria would take advantage of Fenway the way Jody Reed did, for example, but peppering doubles off the Green Monster.
It turns out his road batting average was about twenty points higher than his home batting average but he did more doubles at home, 22 vs 14 on the road.
I expect him to show an improvement next year.
3B - Didn't Dodger third basemen outperform Beltre last year?
2B - Cora will be MUCH worse than Kent offensively.
1B - Kent isn't much better than Choi/Saenz was offensively.
SS - Izturis is of course, a push.
Plus Aybar, Perez, and Choi are all still here.
I love the Dodgers, was born in Brooklyn and moved here before they did. But they are a PR fiasco right now. They need to get in the face of the media and let their fans know what they are doing!
That's interesting, I thought DePo was the source of the "communications problems." What a shock.
wakes up in the year 2009, turns on dodger game, see this infield
3b laroche
ss guzman
2b dewitt
1b loney
c martin
At least the Dodgers did not pick him up at trade deadline.
We got the cheapest guy in Eckstein who had, arguably, the best year of those involved.
Silly verbs...
just inconsistency, with glove and throws. his range is fine and with loney at 1b, that will help a lot in picking off errant throws. and yes, the dream still lives on!
In every interview, press conference, etc. I've seen he carries himself well and is very articulate. Also, compare his classy statement after being fired to McCourt's bumbling press conference. The PR problems of this club rest at the feet of the McCourts, not Depo.
credit thurston fan for the info:
-She majored in Economics
-She worked 4 years under Brian Cashman as the assistant GM of the Yankees
-She's worked 7-8 years as an assistant GM, also working under Dan Evans and Paul Depodesta
-She has earned the respect from all 3 men
-She worked as the director of waivers and player records for the American League
-She's apparently a very tough negotiator and does a lot of the work on player contracts (she has a lot of experience with arbitration cases and player contracts)
-She won her first arbitration case (which happened to be against Bora$$)
-For a brief period, she was the Dodgers farm director
Some quotes:
"Some people may underestimate Kim," says Dodger GM Paul DePodesta, "but it will only happen once."
"Any success I had, Kim shared in equally," says Cashman. "Any positive contributionor negativewe were hand in hand."
Evans says. "For instance, Kim had to learn to deliver bad news to players who were traded, sent down, or let go while they were out of town.'' She's a good communicator
Evans was criticized for refusing to sacrifice his tradable players to give the roster pop. "A lot of people are into gratification now," Ng says. "They want the major-league team to win. We were able to balance the tightrope pretty well. We contended each year. And we got to the play-offs this past year while achieving some of the goals Dan had set."
From Depodesta:
She's "bright, dedicated, loyal, and tough." and "strong-minded, composed, and fearless"
Ng is seen as being more of a presence now than she was under Evans, her straight-ahead style having impressed those who work closely with her. Ng also wonders if it's a matter of perception. While Evans was definitely her mentor, she shares similarities with DePodesta, who is a quiet, computer-savvy Harvard economics grad even youngerby four yearsthan she is. "Because we were together so long, when people saw me and Dan they'd say, 'Dependent,'" Ng says. "When they see me and Paul they say, 'Independent.'"
"All that Kim needs is an owner/organization that is open-minded enough to hire her," says DePodesta. "She is as prepared for the role as many of the candidates out there."
Praise from Bora$$:
"My assumption is that Kim is advancing into that core level of skills, like player analysis," says Scott Boras, who says he and Ng have a good relationship because "she's always prepared and she knows I am, too." If he were advising her, he says, he would emphasize that a number of GMs haven't played the game. They have combined brain power and information from a field-tested staff. "If they can do it," Boras says, "why can't Kim Ng?"
Ng on becoming a GM:
"A lot of things go into being a GM," she says. Talent evaluation. Managing people. Foresight. Leadership. The ability to listen. "Most important," says Ng, "you have to have the courage to do the right thing. The scrutiny can be brutal. I've seen what it's like. You have to love your job to go through all that."
206. You are supposing that PR is entirely made up of being articulate and dealing with the public. Being good at PR has very little to do with that, it's all about being able to manipulate your public image in a positive way, which he was obviously not very good at.
Great stuff.
210
I didn't know Robbie Robertson's 1st name was Jaime. Thanks for clearing up all the confusion.
206 Well said. As I recall DePo spent a few innings in the booth with Vinny the weekend of THE TRADE. He did another 2 innings with Vinny the last week of the season. Can anyone think of comparable efforts by other GM's to get the message out?
http://tinyurl.com/98m28
Anaheim gets Manny Ramirez
Boston gets Glaus from Arizona, Erstad and a prospect from Anaheim.
Arizona gets "combination of players and prospects" from Anaheim
I know I am late but, that would be perfect and, Depo at the press conference could, with a straight face, say, "I really need a True Blue man as my bench coach," and look teary eyed over at Lasorda, "Tommy?"
I've heard that Boston would want Santana and Kotchman from the Angels. I would assume that they would instead go to AZ.
First my predictions
C Mike Matheny
1B Derrek Lee
2B Luis Castillo
SS Rafael Furcal
3B David Wright
OF Jim Edmonds
OF Andruw Jones
OF Jason Bay
The winners
C Mike Matheny
1B Derrek Lee
2B Luis Castillo
SS Omar Vizquel
3B Mike Lowell
OF Andruw Jones
OF Jim Edmonds
OF Bobby Abreu
So who didn't deserve it:
Vizquel, Lowell, Jones, Abreu
The award has become meaningless. Why not call it the best hitter/fielding percentage award
Man I hope not. If Arizona gets their hands on prospects like Wood and Kendrick to go along with Quentin and Drew and the unsigned Upton they are going to be a handfull. Hopefully it will be something along the line of Aybar/Callaspo/Mathis. Would be interested to know what prospects were talking about.
Hard to see Manny playing for Scoscia but he's suppossed to be tight with Vlady.
They probably already just nabbed the smartest GM in our division.
She's ABB (Anybody But Bowden)
As unpalatable as Dodger Nation may have found erstwhile GM Paul DePodesta, do you really want the dim-witted likes of Bill Plaschke running the team?
Holy cow, Theo really is gone from Boston, isn't he?
Somewhere, Larry Lucchino is chuckling, "We fleeced them of Glaus!"
Lowell hardly fits you comment. When BP did the breakdown today they said they would be okay if Lowell won. Everyone keeps saying how Edmunds is overrated but the BP fielding metrics still show him the class of centerfield.
226 - I'd still prefer Theo but what do I know. I'd take Ng in a heartbeat over any other candidate aside from Theo.
The local (mainstream) press was hostile to McCourt from the day he bought the club and hostile to Depo from the day he was hired. So the club was starting off in a hole to begin, but it was the McCourts with their constant firings and bumbling public appearances that dug the hole deeper.
Kotchman
Kennedy
Cabrera
McPherson
Manny
G Anderson
Vlady
Molina-free agent so maybe Jose. Did anyone see the defensive numbers posted by BP on Jose and Yadier this year. Very impressive
If Kotchman and McPherson can deliver on the hype that would be one kick butt lineup.
I know, I just threw in the Edmunds comments cause his defensive numbers are all over the chart. The BP metrics still show him as dominant but other metrics show him as nothing special. Still showing that defense must be the hardest thing to measure in baseball.
http://www.yard-work.org/?p=439
240 - Mike Lowell singlehandedly torpedoed the Orioles' playoff run
Here's the story I read:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9900906/
If it's not Kotch or MacPherson, it's Kendrick or Wood (which would be much more to give up).
giving up kendrick and wood would hurt them more.
it all works out in the end.
I hold to my original thought, the Angels won't sign anyone and won't trade for anyone unless they get some salary relief. At some point in December, Stoneman and Scioscia will say that they did not want to break up a sucessful club and they will deal with their needs internally. There will be some rumbling in the press but not nearly like it would be if the Dodgers don't do anything.
dodgers:
C- russ martin
3b- andy laroche
ss- joel guzman
2b- blake dewitt
1b- james loney
or
angels:
C- Jeff mathis
3b- dallas macpherson
ss- brandon wood
2b- howie kendrick
1b- casey kotchman
Because the alternative is GM speculation and we've spent days on that and we are no closer to a resolution then when black friday happened.
Manager Jim Tracy's Gold Glove votes have been leaked
National League
C Paul Lo Duca
1B Jason Phillips
2B Craig Biggio
SS Oscar Robles
3B Mike Edwards
OF Dave Roberts
OF Jason Repko
American League
C Jason Varitek
1B Darrin Erstad
2B Alex Cora
SS Derek Jeter
3B Adrian Beltre
OF Scott Podsednik
OF Nook Logan
OF Joey Gathright
OF Juan Encarnacion
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/baseball/2005-11-01-player-rankings.htm
NL
1B Shawn Green
SS Jack Wilson
3B Pedro Feliz
OF Juan Encarnacion (should be in the NL part)
I'll take the Angels group. I think Kotchman / Kendrick / Wood will all become very special players.
And your source for that is...?
c - martin should be considerably better than Mathis
3B - Laroche will probably be better than McPherson who I was never high on because of age/context, and McPherson is a terrible fielder who should be playing first
SS - Im one of the few that think Guzman can handle short, and he has similar power potential to Wood, so i guess this is pretty close
2B - Dewitt plays 3B now, so i doubt would be much on defense, i might rather have Denker. I love Kendrick though, so either way I think Kendrick would be better
1B - You have to give Kotchman the edge here, although if Loney ever starts hitting for power its pretty close. But Kotchman has a significant edge.
so, SS is a draw, but the advantages ANAHEIM has a 1B and 2B outwiegh the advantages Los Angeles has at C and 3B.
http://www.yard-work.org/?p=440
i would take laroche over Macpherson at 3b. Laroche is just a natural 3b where Dallas is glaus like in his stature and will probably be moved soon due to poor footwork and size.
i would take wood over guzman. not because of the bat, because i think both will mash in the bigs, but because i think wood has a better chance of staying at SS
at 2b, i would take kendrick over dewitt right now. But, dewitt has been practicing a lot at 2b during dodgers instructional league, so we will see if it becomes a permenant move next season.
at catcher, i would give Martin the nod becasuse of the superior defensive skills and On base skills. he might never develop extremem power, but he could have a lo duca spike year of 20+ homeruns.
If so, several of us who post on this board are lawyers and would love to talk to her.
If you don't have any such knowledge, to play the "race card" is irresponsible.
The problem with that statement is that it should be "were" instead of "was".
With the Angels you can flip it any number of ways. You could dump McPherson and move Wood to 3b and have Aybar at SS. Or you could move further down the chain where they have another nice group of middle infielders. Plus you didn't even mention Kendry Morales who can also plug into 1st. They are simply loaded in the infield but our edge is in our pitching and Matt Kemp. If we can keep 1/2 our arms from blowing out we will make up the difference. E Jackson/Billingsly/Miller/Kuo/Broxton/Hochevar/
Orenduff/Juarez/Orlando Rod/Tiffany/Megrew/Elbert the list just goes on and on and the Angels have nothing to match it.
i converse a lot with a person who is a close friend of the dewitt family and he lets me know from time to time the info going on with dewitt. From him, he said they are thinking about it. they see that laroche could be a permenant fixture at 3b and they feel blake is athletic enough for the switch. in HS, he was the SS for his team so he can probably handle it if he conditions himself right. In instrux, he played a lot of 2b.
286 I don't think the gender part of the entire hand is a bigger obstacle than the race. A woman owner, okay, but a woman GM, who has to evaluate players and negotiate contracts...I think that is where people have a pause. They shouldn't, but they do. I shouldn't, but I do.
maybe they do a switch, move denker to a less demanding position at 3b and move dewitt to 2b. dewitt is the more athletic of the two.
I didn't make the original assertion, but playing the "race card" in baseball is usually not a big stretch.
Others can debate the relative amount of responsibility of doing so.
http://tinyurl.com/9blm7
i would probably take the dodger prospect infield, because martin, laroche, and loney are so good all around and because guzman can rake.
also, the usage distinction between that and which is pretty fuzzy too, it seems.
Anyway, just venting.
Hope we hire either Epstein or Ng.
thats true. at this point, dewitt isnt on kendricks level. but with time, i really think he could be. he has all the tools and makeup to be very good. he also is a tremendously hardworker and very modest about himself (all of this from a first hand source). so we'll see what happens. I think hes going to breakout in vero next year. the reason he was very average the first half of the season last yr was because he was wearing the wrong prescription contact lenses for a long time. he could barely see the ball at night. he also bruised his ribs and that hurt his swing for a while. But once those problems were fixed, he hit extremely better in the second half and was very good in his A+ callup.
right now, we would replace dewitt with young or aybar, since both have proven they can signigicantly hit at levels AA and higher.
288. I think the dodgers have just as much, if not more infield depth and flexibility as the angels. dewitt can move to third, as can guzman who can also move to 1st. Aybar can play 3B or 2B. Although Delwyn Young is probably an outfielder, but Dunlap can play 1st and may be a better hitter than Loney, and dont forget Hu or Abreu, both of whom can play SS and 2B.
there's a lot of discrimination in society still, let alone in baseball. and frankly, the world of baseball is an extremely traditional, conservative, unprogressive one. this should be pretty obvious to anybody, especially in light of recent events. it's an old boys club. it seems patently obvious to me anyway. i think it would be great if kim could break through the glass ceiling. she seems like a fine GM candidate to me.
Ok, I'll drop it now.
82 games played
.318 average
.361 OBP
44 runs
101 hits
24 doubles
2 triples
9 HRs
48 RBI
25 BB
44 K
http://www.bartleby.com/64/C001/061.html
Sorry, didn't mean to annoy.
interesting stuff on dewitt, cant wearing the wrong contact lenses damage your eyes.
Good luck to Chin-Feng Chen playing for the Eagles. They were really bad last year, but they were an expansion team thrown together with a few month's notice.
I don't know how Chen would fare in Japan. It's not easy. The Eagles did not have very good gaijin players last year. They didn't have very good Japanese players last year either.
They tried Luis Lopez, Andy Tracy, and Damon Minor at various times. The team was outhomered 153-88 on the season.
http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/P/roberto-petagine.shtml
Can anyone (ummmm Bob) get info on whether or not Ng has interviewed for a GM job? If she hasn't, my bet is that she decided it was best to perhaps build his resume as much as possible because she is going to have a really hard time breaking the gender barrier.
And as Bob spoke of, race issues are certainly important to bring up when it comes to the front offices of baseball. Isn't Kenny Wiliams the only minority GM in baseball at the moment?
283 .375 .525 244ab 13hr
call up to vero (age 20)
237 .295 .434 219ab 10hr
denker in columbus:
.310 .417 .556 358ab 21hr
call up to vero (age 19)
185 .296 .269 108ab 2hr
dewitt in columbus:
283 .333 .428 481ab 12hr
call up to vero (age 19)
419 .438 .613 31ab 1hr
The issue of a "minority" GM can be a loaded (as in likely to blow up in your face), but I would think most people would consider Omar Minaya of the Mets to be in a minority.
Kim Ng, as far as I've read, has never applied for a GM job and I think her being female is a very big stumbling block. I would think that the Dodgers, with Jamie McCourt's influence, would be one of the few organizations to even consider her for a GM job.
I doubt that her being Asian is a big issue, but there just haven't been many Asians in any major executive positions or even as coaches (anyone besides Wendell Kim?) The Dodgers, under Walter O'Malley, did have one of the first Asians to work in a fairly important front office job in Ike Ikuhara. He was Peter O'Malley's assistant.
Chen would indeed make a lot more money in Japan than in AAA. Being "close" to home is relative. It's not as if Japan and Taiwan are all that close and the country would be just as foreign to him, although there are more Chinese speakers around. I don't know what Sendai is like (where the Eagles play). Yokohama has an enormous Chinatown.
Based on conversation here today wouldn't that be a kick in the teeth: No Theo and Ng goes to Boston.
I've never seen the Koshien Tournament, but I know it gets enormous crowds. My friend in Japan sent me a videotape of Game 3 of the Japan Series from Koshien which I may watch this weekend (even though I know who wins). It's quite a sight to go to that stadium. It's quintessentially Japanese.
Terrific. But then again it is from Hacksaw so the exact opposite is true.
I was there in July and it wasn't too hot, but it rained all the time.
Wait, but if you are one that hates overuse of the sacrifice bunt, maybe you should skip it...
Get cracking!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sportacademy/hi/sa/cricket/default.stm
If so, is Padres owner Moores willing to ante up to pay Epstein the type of money he asked the Red Sox for?
1) it's cheap housing ;-)
2) the presence of good luck charm Dave Roberts!
d st. louis: Why hasn't Bowden gotten more attention by other teams for the vacant GM jobs? He did wonders in Washington on a tight budget
Jim Callis: I'm not a huge Bowden fan. Many of his best players were guys he inherited, and he blew a lot of money on Cristian Guzman and Vinny Castilla. Then he ripped the whole team in September. Add in that he's probably the least-trusted GM in the game, and I don't think he's all that great of a hire.
I figure if he wasn't interested in the DRay job (or if the interest wasn't mutual) that he'll take at least the year off and collect his Dodger paycheck.
BTW, I disagree Mike Carminati's take on the DePo firing (well, duh for me). Sure he spent money in the 2004-2005 offseason but they weren't bad contracts. The best was Derek Lowe and he at least is an above average pitcher (if only slightly). Lowe was the case of no pitching prospects and no other pitchers to acquire. Drew wasn't a bad signing. The wrist was just bad luck. The shoulder, maybe not. I don't see the signings as a "turning to the dark side"... but above average stop gaps until the young core starts to arrive. The players that didn't turn out well (Nakamura, Valentin) were low-risk and we're not financially burdened by them (well, maybe the McCourts are).
I'm not sure Mike is fully aware of all the circumstances. Every move has at least been defensible; some haven't worked out well but most have.
vr, Xei
We'll become the model team for old-style baseball, admired by all stat-geek-haters. Lasordaball. Who would write that book? David McCullough? Douglas Brinkley? Or maybe Malcolm Gladwell, as a sequel to "Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking." Or Jared Diamond, as a sequel to "Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed."
Just trying to look at the bright side. I happen to believe Hacksaw is dead-bang correct. It makes all the sense in the world. I'm sure by now Kim Ng absolutely despises the McCourts, and can't wait for a ticket out. DePodesta was probably just one of many who called Lucchino to vouch for her. And Theo...man, I'm trying to hang onto the dream, but I think he'd probably rather cut his foot off than work for McCourt.
Lasordaball. It's coming, to a century near you.
That was the strangest post I've ever seen from a smart poster. Are you pretending 2004 just didn't happen at all. Chen has one major league hit in his career at the same age as Beltre and you used them in the same sentence. I must have misunderstood your post or missed some sarcasm or something. I'd have to run the numbers but I'm fairly certain that Beltre's 166 home runs are already higher then 90% of the 3rd baseman who have played major league baseball.
We would be so lucky to have LaRoche match what Beltre has done.
beltre was suppose to be a cant miss, no doubt about it, superstar, future HOF etc etc.
has he lived up to that potential? well he did one year but the other 6 he hasnt. But hes only 26 and still has time i guess.
but i do agree with you, the question was kind of strange.
He could hire James Randy to run the team, PR/GM/Manager.
James Randy is smart enough to make the transition to baseball.
My unsolicited advice to Depodesta is to increase his evaluation weightings for character and fan-appeal when assembling a roster. Unfortunately, to paraphrase him, and as many on this site agreed months ago, he can't afford to listen to fans.
http://tinyurl.com/86mp
355 - That's a scary situation, but it seems more logical than Theo coming here or Ng staying :-(.
I think DePo might have kept Lima around if he could have gotten him for around $1.5 million.
But that would have been a bad move. Look at Lima's stats this year... flat out horrible.
Yep. And Valentin/Edwards was just as bad as Beltre, but for a lot less. Depo was a genius.
Meanwhile, you'll be relieved to hear that "the Dodgers are making considerable progress" on the GM front.
http://tinyurl.com/bdxj6
I think the Lakers have a good shot at the playoffs. They were in it for 3/4s of the season last year. Now they got Phil back along with Odom back at SF and Kwame at PF. Kwame has ability and can be a force at PF with his size and strength.
...like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. 'Give me five bees for a quarter,' you'd say.
"Now where were we? Oh yeah -- the important thing was that I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn't have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones..."
He has taken one bad shot so far, though he made it. Looks like the Lakers have no defense, which I feared would be the case.
I reached that point with the Dodgers some time ago. Unfortunately, I now find myself rooting against Kobe as well. However, Phil is my all-time favorite coach, so I'd like to see them do well for his sake.
Nope. And Mihm is the kinda guy who isn't gonna get any calls from the refs. 7 foot white guys are foul magnets.
BINGOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lawler's Law: First to 100 wins the game. IT'S THE LAW!!!!
Lawler's Law is irrelevant in today's NBA.
Ralph is a very good announcer, something the Lakers lack.
He's had the law for over 25 years though
But Lawler remembers an era when both teams would crack 100 quite often.
I'm always stunned now when I see an NBA team score in the 70s. It's like we're in the Deadball Era of the NBA.
That was pretty weird when I saw it.
http://tinyurl.com/bszyn
The Lakers are another story. It's been Kobe and Smush Parker (in the first half) and that's it. Odom is choking.
I agree that many of his moves have been marginally good, but some are debatable. What makes me most nervous with Depo were the moves he planned to make that fell through, i.e. Unit, Charles Johnson, and the whole Yankee trade fiasco last year. For me, it's hard to imagine he didn't lose an awful lot of credibility with those, resulting in him being less effective in the future.
Raplh Lawler is the man. While Chick was doing all those games he at least he got to see his team win almost every game. Ralph has been at it for more then 25 years for one of the worse teams in sports history. He should get a bloody gold medal.
402 I think you've itemized exactly the DePodesta errors that were clearly unforced and not just bad luck. He was a work in progress. I don't think you'll find that folks on this site who wanted to keep him ignore that he made some big blunders.
Some who wanted him to stay saw his potential as being greater than his performance. Others felt comfortable because his values seemed perfect for a team with a lot of exciting young prospects. He wasn't likely to trade them for a short-term fix. Lasorda's presence in this mix is disturbing, because he was involved in the Dodgers' trading away of Pedro Martinez and Paul Konerko. So DePo grows even greater in retrospect compared to the morass we're in now.
Dodgers to talk with Rangers' Hart
The Dodgers are interested in former Rangers general manager John Hart as a potential candidate for their vacant GM position.
Rangers owner Tom Hicks confirmed that Dodgers owner Frank McCourt called him Wednesday and asked for permission to speak to Hart, who is under contract as a consultant. Clubs must ask the Rangers for permission to speak with him...
The guy wasn't perfect. The continued presence of Erikson and Gabrowski showed that. DePo was consitient and had a plan. He deserved better than to be shoved to the curb with the McCourt's other refuse. He should have been allowed to carry out his plan.
Is the filibuster allowed in contract negotiations?
http://tinyurl.com/bdto4
What do we know about him? (Other than that team is pretty talented, and includes a few former Dodgers...)
The return of Lo Duca, Encarnacion, and Mota!
The Glory Days return! All will be well! All hail 2004!
Beinfest could trade both Martin AND Navarro to get Lo Duca back.
Verizon is reporting that the Dodgers have asked for permission to speak to everyone in the flippin' phone book! "We are not limiting our search to people who have seen a baseball game," spokesman Josh Rawitch said. "The Dodgers' pursuit of excellence will take us to some unusual places. I myself am on my way to a massage parlor right now, because I've heard that Fifi combines great communications skills with an excellent brand of leadership. Tally ho!"
I don't have any issue with Depo's plan. My issue is that I don't see much evidence of him successfully executing it. Even with free agents last year, he was unable to sign targeted players, the pitching market "got away from him", and he had to settle for whoever was left with Lowe and Perez. Kent was an excellent pickup, and I like Drew, but the Drew contract is curious, and it seems to me it was a panic signing.
For me, the result is most important. The team Depo mostly inherited won 93; the team he mostly built won 71. That's the bottom line for me.
No, really, the discomfort Epstein would cause Plaschke would be worth the price of admission all by itself. I mean, what kind of cheap shot attack can you level at a guy who turns the stinking Red Sox into a World Series winner?
Despite that, he's managed to pull the Marlins into contender status and keep them there. He took over the team in 2002, having been dragged down to Miami from the GM slot in Montreal by Loria. Like DePo, he took over the team in the middle of spring training. By the following season, they were in the World Series--the big moves being the hiring of McKeon and the acquisition of I-Rod, plus not surrendering the young players who were coming up.
Both Beinfest and Hart seem acceptable. They've won, and they've won with young cores of players they've allowed to develop.
I know what you mean about Sam Cassell. Always hated the guy and he always killed the Clips. Reminds me of a certain 2B I always hated until he came to play for my favorite team and kicked butt in every catagory.
That was a very fine post here:
http://tinyurl.com/7egxc
...and I have an exam on ancient Mesopotamia tomorrow afternoon. Back to studying...
From the DN: "While the affable McKeon got most of the attention that October (2003), it was Beinfest who during that season added key players Ugueth Urbina, Lenny Harris, Chad Fox, Rick Helling and Jeff Conine."
Conine was an original Marlin, but he'd been playing in Baltimore when Beinfest reacquired him.
Of the options I've read here tonight, I'd opt for the two headed "monster" of Jon, with Bob watching his back. No, seriously. Jon's knowledge and Bob's charm? My fear is that the end result will be a different two headed monster....
Believe me, those Marlins completely demolished my Phils that year, I know all about the moves they made that summer.
Sometimes it is just interesting though to just go back and see a team like that get built, piece by piece...oh, what is "the DN", by the way?
Too bad that post probably fell upon a bunch of deaf ears who more than likely whined about how Beltre would have led the Dodgers to the world series had he been re-signed.
"Fernando Valenzuela is at it again. The former Dodger great turned 45 on Tuesday and today will make his first start for Mexicali in the Mexican League."
good for him.
421 - Love the plea to bring him back; is that even possible?
434 - I bet that's Lasorda's idea. Maybe he wants to try some Fernando-mania Revisited schtick.
Should I be insulted?
Refused to resign one of the heroes of the 2003 World Series (Pudge Rodrgiuez).
He traded a young prospect (Wilson Valdez) for a pitcher who spent opening day 2005 heckling his former teammates.
Traded a World Series hero, the teams first baseman, and a young prospect for an aging catcher and a bad reliever. He never filled the hole left by Penny (see Ismael Valdez and Al Leiter.)
Traded Abraham Nunez, who made St. Louis forget Scott Rolen, for a useless middle reliever. He sure would have helped when Lowell became eight million dollars worth of replacement player.
Created a horrible clubhouse atmosphere by signing Carlos Delgado. I can prove this because A.J. Burnett quit the team at the end of the season.
Compared to Beinfest, DePo is a saint. Of course, none of that matters because Beinfest doesn't own a computer.
First Evans, now DePo plus people like Lon Rosen and the various PR, marketing and financial people they canned still under contract.
The amount of money owed to former employees must be pretty impressive.
432 Epstein bears some facial resemblance to Ben Affleck, which might be reason enough not to hire him. If their career paths follow a similar arc, we're better off without him.
It's pretty hard to be a Dodger fan right now.
3.05 (13-11)
3.32 (15-7)
2.65 (10-11)
3.98 (11-10)
3.98 (9-14)
That ranges from above average to down right studly. Yes, he became utterly horrible after that, but the Dodgers got a lot of good years from Valdez.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9911744/
He calls Evans the "key architect of the '04 team." Yes in terms of headcount- but Evans did not hand DePo the keys to a playoff team as we all know. The 2003 team was last in the NL in runs. Injuries to Jordan and McGriff do not compare to Drew/Bradley. The 2004 team got over the hump first thanks to Beltre, but second from Bradley, Werth, Finley. So Evans gets a big hug for not trading Beltre but DePo got us into October.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.