Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The team in Scranton was in revolt, and the fans watching on television were once again agape. Already the standard bearer for bad leadership, Michael Scott, anti-hero, had taken it to an unprecedented low, destroying the Dunder Mifflin Christmas party and any sense of holiday cheer with his Molotov personality disorder of arrogance, pettiness, selfishness, jealousy, insensitivity and incompetence.
Daunted but not defeated, bereft of introspection but not of gumption, Scott set out during a commercial break to raise everyone's spirits from the dead. His plan was instinctive and therefore as ill-conceived as they come, providing fuel for the fire, arms for the mutinous.
He bought 15 giant jugs of vodka. About one for every person at the party. And started pouring. He started pouring alcohol for the angry.
And it worked.
Everyone had a ball. Alcohol is not the answer, and yet alcohol was the answer. And Michael Scott was none the wiser, to be sure.
For me, this half-hour of television worked like an Afterschool Special in its cautionary tale. We watch every move the Dodgers make. We look at some moves and know they are right and yet see them go wrong, and we look at some moves and know they are wrong and yet see them go right. Decision-making in baseball is always about odds, but the odds are always fallible.
When you're living or dying with baseball, it is tragedy. When you step back, baseball is comedy. It is Seinfeld, it is Chaplin, it is Molière. And competency is no longer as relevant as blind luck, or as Michael Scott would spin it from behind his office desk, "street smarts."
It's not that decision-making by your ne'er-do-well gut is the smart way to go. No, no, no. It's that smarts are not always rewarded. Sometimes, stupidity conquers all.
On a good note it is being reported that Dan Evans will be getting a look by the Red Sox. Did you guys know that Dan Evans was the original stats guy? At the age of 22 he was the person responsible for entering the stats into the new computer system that STATS(the company) had just created. The White Sox at the time were only the 2nd team in baseball to employ a computer to help determine statistical tendancies.
http://www.defamer.com/hollywood/casting/fez-does-ponch-141843.php
I seek information, not to quiz people.
Btw, Elmer Dessens just signed with the Royals.
Also, Mike Megrew was taken in round 2 of the Rule 5 draft. Didn't see who if anyone the Dodgers took.
So, we're hemorrhaging prospects. I'm a little disappointed to lose Megrew, as I think he still has a future, but I also think we'll likely get him back.
10 - you can talk to me.
I love both the British and American versions of "The Office". I didn't like the initial episodes, but the show has really taken off this year.
There are just 14 BBC episodes. 12 of the regular series and a 2-part Christmas special.
The Dodgers' Joel Guzman is continuing his steady development, a trend that started in 2004. Guzman is hitting .294/.370/.513 with 5 homers, 9 doubles, 26 RBI, 14 walks and 26 strikeouts in 119 at bats playing for the Estrellas. His notorious raw power has been on display more often in game action this year, and he's shown a much better understanding of the strike zone. Guzman has drawn a walk every 8.5 at bats and has struck out every 4.6, compared to 10.5 and 3.4 at Double-A during the summer. Joel told us at the season's start that former Dodger GM Paul DePodesta wanted him to concentrate more on his hitting and at bats, no matter where the Estrellas put him on the field. Guzman has played primarily at both infield corners, and recently was moved back to shortstop. He has committed eleven errors on the season.
Dodgers RHP Yhency Brazoban is leading the league in saves with 12 for the first-place Licey Tigers. Brazoban has a 1.96 ERA and 18 strikeouts in 18.1 IP
I agree, I can't see Florida keeping Megew on the MLB roster although without Beckett and Burnett, who knows what pitchers they will trot out to the mound next year.
The Dodgers' Joel Guzman is continuing his steady development, a trend that started in 2004. Guzman is hitting .294/.370/.513 with 5 homers, 9 doubles, 26 RBI, 14 walks and 26 strikeouts in 119 at bats playing for the Estrellas. His notorious raw power has been on display more often in game action this year, and he's shown a much better understanding of the strike zone. Guzman has drawn a walk every 8.5 at bats and has struck out every 4.6, compared to 10.5 and 3.4 at Double-A during the summer. Joel told us at the season's start that former Dodger GM Paul DePodesta wanted him to concentrate more on his hitting and at bats, no matter where the Estrellas put him on the field. Guzman has played primarily at both infield corners, and recently was moved back to shortstop. He has committed eleven errors on the season.
Dodgers RHP Yhency Brazoban is leading the league in saves with 12 for the first-place Licey Tigers. Brazoban has a 1.96 ERA and 18 strikeouts in 18.1 IP
I agree, I can't see Florida keeping Megew on the MLB roster although without Beckett and Burnett, who knows what pitchers they will trot out to the mound next year.
Dwight and Gareth are quite different and are both great in their own way.
The Jim-Pam dynamic is a bit different than the one between Dawn-Tim because they need to draw it out over more episodes. They may have to resolve it sooner than later.
The first few episodes were pretty weird Twilight Zone remakes of the British series, but they've really been on a roll this season. I think "The Dundies" and "Office Olympics" episodes were just amazing. You might want to track down some season 2 episodes.
if a decision is right at the time and it doesn't work, it's STILL the right decision, just with unfortunate results. but you should make that same decision every time.
but to the joe morgans of the world (and i have heard joe espouse this belief many times), if something works, it must have been right. he uses hindsight to evaluate decisions.
i'm actually writing a paper, and my research led me to some work on decisionmaking. i read that eventually someone who uses something like joe's system of hindsight-valuation, which is similar to the linear adaptive model, would in the long run, end up settling on the right answer most of the time.
that is, if choosing between A and B, if A worked last time, next time choose A. if it didn't work last time, choose B. but it's suboptimal compared to a utility maximizer, who goes by the odds every time.
on the other hand if you just go by "gut" or "instinct" or some random thing like the direction of the wind, then well you have no methodology and you have no business making decisions at all.
Previous exceptions have been Cheers, Seinfeld, The Simpsons, Homicide, and My So-Called Life.
Definitely check out the DVDs of the British series (there were 2 6-episode seasons and a couple of specials that wrapped things up). I'm going on record as saying it's the best show ever. The American version is also very, very good.
Of course I've never spoken with the man about it, but I bet if he had liberty to speak his mind, he would say that getting fired by the McCourts was the best thing that ever happened to him.
The day that he got that pink slip, Paul DePodesta got both his life and his sanity back.
Reading some very obvious tea leaves, the McCourts were making Depo's life miserable. They'd castrated the poor bugger. Not only were they meddling, they were inept, caprcious and malicious. And need I mention Lasorda's influence?
I agree that it's frustrating not to have the chance to carry out a vision and a plan, to get blown up 20 months into a 60-month journey.
But I think the Depo pathos is hugely misplaced on this site.
I truly believe that the McCourts were such despotic, meddling fools that Paul DePodesta is much, much happier since they fired him.
One more day, more more week, one more month would've just added that much more agony and frustration to Depo's life.
Since DePodesta is about to become a father for the second time, I'm assuming that this is figurative, not literal.
Happier, maybe, but it's hard to imagine him getting another GM job anytime soon. Any owner giving him another chance will do so knowing the Joe Morgan legions will descend upon him with great haste. Most will opt for the safer choice.
I just got home from college and looked around a little, and found izturis for mench rumor but that's all.
I'm starting to believe that the team with the most holes that has a shot a winning their division (dodgers) is the team that gets the most rumors said about them.
Still, on the glass-half-full side. Mr. Ned hasn't made a real mistake yet (though God forbid we give up anyone like Broxton for Kevin Mensch...why not just keep Milton, in that case?) And best of all, Lasorda's alleged "influence" seems to be damn near non-existent. I won't feel safe until he joins the Big Dodger in The Sky, but...rumors of his effectiveness seem to me greatly exaggerated.
Gut decisions are based on adaptive pattern matching algorithms. Your brain makes decisions, but both the algorithm and the data used are completely subconscious, so they are impossible to analyze.
The decisions may look random, but that's only because you can't access either the algorithm or the data used to arrive at that decision.
That's why experienced people generally make better decisions than inexperienced ones. They've had a longer time to adapt to their successes and mistakes. Of course, some people adapt more quickly and efficiently than others.
The David Brent motivational speaking episode is one of the funniest things I've ever seen.
I'd also like to recommend My Name Is Earl. I initially thought it looked really stupid, but it's actually a very smart show. It manages to be really funny while still having a heart without being schlocky. I think one of the few bright spots in non-cable TV over the last few years is the presence of some fresher, smarter comedies.
I would have to think that going out to lunch with Paul DePodesta would be an utterly unremarkable experience. He doesn't strike me as a witty conversationalist.
And he'd just end up figuring out the tip for the meal with some evil device like a calculator!
someone mentioned this earlier but if renteria, who had a terrible year last yr in a hitter park and has a bloated contract can get a prospect of andy marte's caliber.... what the hell can a healthy izzy get?
Plus they got Beckett. If the Red Sox had also scored Drew and Abreu for Manny, then I think every team in baseball would have to go with the no GM strategy.
From the Braves perspective, I have a hard time seeing how Renteria at a cost Marte and $30m over the next 3 years is preferable to Furcal at a cost of $39m over 3 years. Considering that Furcal would have probably taken less than $39m to remain in Atlanta this seems like a poor plan B.
take the grady little decision everyone has been talking about since he got hired:
"should i take pedro out or leave him in here? hrmmm. i think it's he's got it today. he can take care of business for this one last inning. better than the 'pen, anyway".
what's telling grady little that he should trust pedro, and that pedro still had something left in the tank? is it his prior experience of ace pitchers, or the playoffs, that he's subconsciously drawing upon? is it just that he was still "adapting" and learning about the consequences of leaving pedro in late in games, past 100 pitches and 6-7 innings, even though he'd had that situation many times during the season? or was it just a whim or a hunch not really based on much at all? you're right, it's hard to analyze, but i have a feeling that a lot of times it's more random than you'd like to think.
so they are basically paying marte 4 mil for the next 3 seasons if you factor in his rookie salary+ the money going to the braves
Also, be sure to spin a John Lennon tune today (my personal pick is "Happy Christmas"). It's truly unbvelievable that it was 25 years ago tonight I heard Howard Cosell on Monday Night Football make the terrible announcement.
Fret not for Depo's future.
The industry knows that the McCourts are malicious fools.
Depo will live off the McCourts fat checks while working for another club as a "consultant" or semi-assistant.
Then he'll get another chance. He's not been sent to the Gulag Archipelago. He'll be back and better for the experience. We should all have as many options as Paul DePodesta.
48 --
Not as bad as it looks for the Braves. The Red Sox are paying $11 millon. So the Braves owe Renteria $6 million per year.
Yeah, I kind of simplified things a little. It's probably a tie between The Office and Freaks and Geeks.
53-
The Wire is awesome. It's definitely my favorite non-comedy (although there's often hilarious interplay between the characters). Unfortunately, it's nearly impossible to get into the show without starting from Season 1, Episode 1, so I don't think it's going to attract a lot of viewers. Luckily HBO doesn't have to worry about advertisers.
I had heard that Youkilis was going to get a shot this year over Mueller/Millar/Olerud 3B/1B combo the Red Sox had featured last year. That was pre-Lowell though.
Marte was BP's #1 prospect in their top 100 for 2005. His top two PECOTA comparable players are Miguel Cabrera and Ron Santo.
The other TV boxes I own: Freaks and Geeks, yes. Will watch over and over. Simpsons seasons 3-5 (so far). Deadwood. The Wire. Futurama season 2. Bob Newhart Show (okay, I got that for free from work, was a childhood favorite, not nec. something i would buy though.)
Back to baseball: So did the Dodgers take anyone other than the wonderfully named Bastardo?
I think you may have missed the point.
Another "Deadwood" fan? Good.
All I can say here on this site about that show is that it's about that those &@&%$#@#!s in the front office get some ##(&=^*(! players to show those ^&(#@$##)rs in San Diego and San Francisco who's boss!
How about Broxton for Mench?
Seems like the Rangers are likely to move at least one OF. Seems like they and the LAD have been talking to one another.
And how did this obscenity slip by?
The Padres, Dodgers, Red Sox and Royals have expressed interest in J.T. Snow, sources told the San Francisco Chronicle....
The Dodgers could non-tender Hee Seop Choi and use Snow and Olmedo Saenz at first base until Jeff Kent moves over from second.
If you took a drink every time they said ---------- you be completely --------- by the end of the show, if not dead from alcohol poisoning.
"Dec 8 - The Dodgers and Blue Jays have a deal on the table that would send outfielder Milton Bradley from L.A. to Toronto for pitcher Miguel Batista, ESPN.com's Jayson Stark reports."
According to the James handbook, for righties it plays 106 for average and 106 for HRs -- in other words about 6% above the norm. Dodger Stadium for righties plays 91 average and 106 for HRs. So Mench's average would likely take a bit of a hit, but his power would be inline.
Of course, Mench is still only about an .800 OPS guy with mediocre D (98 Rate2). So what's all the interest for? I'd rather keep Bradley.
I'm very geeked up after the Renteria/Marte trade knowing Izzy is going to have some serious value come next summer or winter.
Where do you read these Jayson Stark rumors?
Do you have to be an Espn insider?
I feel like the lone wolf on Willy Aybar, but I'd love to see Aybar get a legit shot at 3B in the next 1-2 years (while not just handing him the job).
And behind Aybar you have LaRoche so Hank B's probably a better fit for another club.
you think he grew up with a chip on his shoulder?
anyways.. the guy we lost second pick overall... luis gonzalez, his stats look pretty decentl. and he's a lefty. can you guys write about anything you know about the guys we lost or drafted?
(i ask although i feel like jon will do this at day's end)
He'll make $4.75M next year.
The Rocks had success with last year's rule 5 guy (Carvajal), but then they stupidly traded him for a catcher they don't need. By the way, they non-tendered Greene, so he is available for backing up Navarro.
Colorado didn't need a catcher? Closser blows on offense and defense. He's Koyie Hill.
Probably because most of us on this forum remember 2003 and how he was one of the worse offensive players in baseball in 2003 and after his hot start in 2005 until he was sidelined with the surgery. Even 2004 was only adequate. He has some supporters here, I'm not one of them. No power, no on base skills, lousy base stealer, solid defender. Aren't the minors littered with middle infielders that fit that description. I know the Dominican Republic is.
Defensively, yes, he's above average, or was. But I wouldn't pay money for his defense until I saw that he could still throw after TJ surgery.
With no bat and a weakened arm, he's probably not even MLB quality. Even at his peak offensively, he's probably at best a league-average SS (that great 2-month batting average was still nothing but singles). So if anyone wants him for an actual starter, God Bless.
47 The CW is when the Braves give up on a highly touted prospect, they know something. So as big an upside as Marte has, maybe in the end he'll be another ... Odalis.
He'd get more respect if credible arguments were made on his behalf.
Ned hasn't shown much of an ego. I think your reaching. The man disobeyed his manager in a public forum that was detrimental to the team. Everything else I care about but not enough to trade him. That was a trading offense because it was not the 1st time he put himself above the team and it won't be the last time. If you guys can live with it great but not me.
No HBO in the house so can't comment on those.
With the amount of movement that has happened and will continue, I think Mr. Ned will have ample opportunity to fasten his stamp on the 2006 Dodgers. Also, I get a good vibe from the non-moves thus far and teh creative thinking in the Furcal signing that I do not think Mr. Ned is a push over.
[BTW thinking back that may have been Depo's true short-coming - he seemed to get out dueled by other "old-school" GM in deals and potential signings - just think back to the whole Vasquez fiasco]
That being said, I just hope that Mr. Ned values Milton's qualities as much as we do and is willing to down play his short-comings. I think it would be nice for Mr. Ned and Grady to get their crack at cracking the Milton puzzle rather than shipping him out just to get rid of him.
The Padres, Dodgers, Red Sox and Royals have expressed interest in J.T. Snow, sources told the San Francisco Chronicle. The Padres have said they intend to put Ryan Klesko at first base, so Snow might be a reserve and pinch-hitter in San Diego. The Dodgers could non-tender Hee Seop Choi and use Snow and Olmedo Saenz at first base until Jeff Kent moves over from second. Dec. 8 - 3:36 pm et
Source: rotoworld/ San Francisco Chronicle
That said, his defense is real nice, although his defensive reputation is a bit inflated. But his offensive contributions just dont cut it, his UPSIDE is a .290/.340/.390 hitter with 25-30 sb. Thats fine if the rest of your lineup is like the Red Sox or the Yankees, but the dodgers cant afford to carry a hitter like that when they cant even piece together an outfield or find certain option at 3B.
I'd proably keep Bradley but you raise an excellent point that often gets overlooked. And your points abou Bradley's medical history also get overlooked.
Steve is Mr. Wolf, the Cleaner.
I think Milton is gone, unless Ned ('scuse me - "Mr. Ned") is just dangling him.
Have we already talked about the 3-way deal that fell through that would have sent Manny Ramirez to the Dodgers, Lowe and Trot Nixon to the Phils, and Abreu to the Red Sox? Dan Patrick talked about it a bit this morning.
I agree with you 100 percent. I have been impressed with the way NED has handled himself. I like Grady Little as our manager because he will be able to get the players to play well consistantly. 188 wins in two seasons in the AL EAST is quite an accomplishment. Having a popular manager with the players makes it easier to convince free agents to come to your team without having to always offer Furcal kind of money to lure them to LA.
Picking up Furcal was a no brainer. We have missed a leadoff man since maybe Brett Butler. Having a SS as a leadoff man who can steal a lot of bases opens up having three bangers in the OF. Maybe there will be a market for Izturis at the trading deadline.
I would not trade Broxton for Mench. From what I have read, he hasnt hit well away from home.
Milton has got to go. I had hoped that he would be with us for a long time, but his actions have been way out of line. ME guys have no place being Dodgers. It is bad enough that our McCourt is a ME guy, but I dont think Coletti and Little are.
He struggled with his bat early in his career, but then had a fine year in 2004 -- WARP of 6.4, compared to Furcal at 6.0. He started off 2005 even batter, then he got injured.
So how will he do when he comes back -- who knows? That is a legitimate concern. But if he comes back to his 2004 level, he is a better value at $3.1 mils than Furcal at $13.
Guess what? He's a number 8 guy. If we had a decent manager last year I doubt there would be so much dislike (mis)placed on Izzy.
Good post on Izzy.
Sure, he could be a better fit for another club that has more offense. I don't see his OPS going much beyond .730, either, but he did show a lot of improvement in 2004 and 2005 before the hamstring injury.
In 2004 he gave excellent returns on the dollar for a team that finally won a division title. Tracy probably asked more of him than he should've. He's not a leadoff man and JT seldom gave him a breather. Texas might be a better fit for him.
Stan from Tacoma
Agree with your points on Izzy. More important, the marketplace appears to be assigning decent value to him (although that remains to play out(. That's pretty impressive. After all, he won't be ready for six months and is coming off a severe injury.
Will Mr. Ned endure the same level of vitriol if he too trades/releases what is arguably the most popular Dodger at this time (i.e. Hee Seop Choi! Hee Seop Choi! Hee Seop Choi!)?
I always think of a ME guy when you disobey the manager and promote your own agenda to the media. I always think of a ME guy who explodes in a frenzy over a very small issue causing a suspension during the middle of a pennant race. I always think of a ME guy who can't get along with his manager(Cleveland)when he refuses to hustle when everyone else can. JMO
April: 782
May: 837
June: 270
July: 597
August:493
Re: Cesar. I love him too - the attitude, the spectular plays in the field, the "scrappiness" (hey, it has it's charms). But Furcal is better. Perez may even be better, assuming he could improve in the field. And we don't know if his arm will recover anyways. Izzy's best skills are highly replaceable. Wasn't Juan Castro a brilliant defender with no power or on-base skills?
What's "risky" about Izzy is one thing--his major injuries in '05. He can't be counted on--hence the Furcal signing. It could be he'll continue his offensive contributions pre-injury and maintain his defense. But maybe not. Figuring him for second base is just PR puff designed to make him and his fans feel better. Hopefully, by the time he's recovered, the incumbent first base platoon will be productive enough that Little won't want to mess with it. Also assuming Kent of '05 continues into '06.
If Izzy comes back undiminished, the Dodgers should showcase him for a few weeks, because he'd be a great asset to trade. But I don't know why a GM would take a chance on him now, except at firesale prices.
Got a call from the Dodger ticket office yesterday telling me that they are going back to the old policy and will print the retail price on the tickets. A small victory to be sure but it was alot better response then the one I got last April when the ticket manager blew off my complaint.
"It's possible Snow will retire. He has long indicated his wish to stay in the Bay Area with his family and finally have summers off to enjoy camping."
24 hours from now we wont even remember this.
Or 20 comments from now.
Excellent post on Izzy. Too bad about the injuries of late. It's interesting that any GM would talk about getting him now, given the medicals, but maybe it's just talk.
I am a huge Nip/Tuck fan and of course the Sopranos can not wait till the new season.
Shame on you for poking fun at our old friend Alex. Until the Sox make another trade, he's probably their opening day shortstop.
I heard him give a lecture on the parallels between "The Canterbury Tales" and turning a double play once. Another time, I saw him perform quadruple bypass surgery while fouling off 235 pitches from Matt Clement.
The Wire and Deadwood are two shows that I couldn't hang with, mostly because my wife and I tend to watch these things together and the violence and language upset her. Even with "Rome," I eventually had to watch it in the other room. I would love to catch up on both via DVDs.
I don't know what's wrong with me, I just don't do Tivo. I'm almost 50, I'm not tech-averse, but for some reason I just don't want it. Maybe it's a hangover from the message from childhood that watching TV is "a waste of time." Somehow, it's okay to watch it if you just happen to see something you like during the hours you've alloted to it...I guess my parents did a number on me. Of course, their TV is on much more than mine nowadays.
I'm going to try to catch up with The Wire and Deadwood sometime, perhaps on DVD, but I didn't feel an enormous imperative to stick with them after the first couple of episodes. They didn't grab me the way, say, Homicide: Life on the Street, Oz or The Sopranos did.
There is no way that The Wire is better than Homicide was.
I cringe when I see actors from that show in lesser roles. Someone should send Andre Braugher and Kyle Secor giant bags of money to avoid having to work on the kinds of shows they do now. Commander in Chief--yech!
I have a DVR. Although I do not own a cell phone I can tell by observation that people who have them can not only live without them they even find more creative places to hold useless conversations.
Colletti could want Sandy Alomar Jr. Seems like he doesn't want Phillips. Gurnick mentions that Colletti is more concerned about 3B than 1B. Cottetti: "I want to try to improve for '06 without hindering '07 and '08. That is really the trick of these meetings. I could improve us right now, but I'm not sure it would make '07 and '08 as good as they can be"
And I use it to phone in my prep football stories to the Daily News, I'm sure the erratic connections are responsible for the increase in typos.
Plaschke, consistent. The two words appear together yet they seem so strange. Let me try to figure this out. Hmm...
I can't.
Brain... exploding ... exploding ...
We're sorry folks, but Bob's head blew up. This is a friend of his completing this post in accordance with his last will and testament.
At the very least, it would explain his flip-flopping*.
* flip-flopping isn't bad, as long as you explain why you flipped or flopped. Plaschke doesn't explain why.
In my best Larry David, I said, no, no I don't....two days later a TIVO was on my doorstep. I sent it to my sister cause she had a roomie who loved it. Anyways, now my sis is like you gotta get Tivo.
People seem to not understand why I won't get one and I do watch my fair share of TV..
And yeah the only reason I have a cell phone is for work and for my wife to bug me.
I am not a gadget guy. Never was. I do have an I-pod however. I may break down and get the DVR package or whatever it is with my cable (cox)
slow day around here when my longest post in 2 months concerns TIVO.
LOS ANGELES - Barbra Streisand has canceled her subscription to the Los Angeles Times over the firing of the paper's liberal columnist.
I've been resurrected! I didn't care one way or the other about Robert Scheer. I just cared about the awful Dodgers and Angels coverage.
You do know that perhaps 20 years from now, Plaschke will be a nominee for the Spink Award.
http://tinyurl.com/bmont
Colorado raided us again, taking LHP Luis Gonzalez. You already know Megrew was taken by Florida (and given his Tommy John status, we've all expressed doubts he'll stay on roster for the year).
And then they lost Brandon Weeden, too. (Not a big deal.) Who was a throw in in the Jeff Weaver trade.
Guess Bastardo was it for LA's picks.
PS: I loved Homicide, too. Amazing show, brilliant writing. Jon you should give The Wire another try, at least season 1 (season 2 takes longer to get into) - maybe a few more episodes? Or not.
C
Or do we all just procastinate more than fans of other teams? Why, I'm doing it right now!
He might not have a market today, but come July a healthy Izzy should have a decent market. Even if the market is only an 820 OPS LF, it is something for a player who has no position on the team.
Will Colletti be going for the dealer Blue Book or the wholesale Blue Book? What is Izturis's condition "Excellent", "V. Good" or "Fair"? What about the mileage? What about the accessories?
I've been looking up prices for a 2006 Izturis in the Kelley Blue Book, but I can only find Isuzus.
Dodger Thoughts, like Tivo, is one of those things you can completely do without until you start using it.
Actually, I just can't think of a funny come-back. Something about Encarnacion. . . yeah, just isn't coming.
Do I buy a book for myself for x-mas, or will all my hints, nudges, links..do the trick? Do I trust the wife to bring home the goods.
http://cbs4boston.com/sports/local_story_342162930.html
http://cbs4boston.com/sports/local_story_342162930.html
Alternative suggestions:
* Ye Olde King's Head, also in SaMo
* The bar of McCormick & Schmick's downtown
Message to Jacque: LA is dump, you'd be playing in a pitchers park, we have a terrible team, and you'll get booed mercifully. The Cardinals fans will cheer for you, even when you strikeout. If you want to win go to St. Louis!
Or the Golden Gopher downtown.
LA is as bad a philly jacque!
So much for my theory that the Dodgers were more in trade mode than FA signing mode. The prospects are safe, all tucked in their beds.
No on the 2 African American dudes with French names (thankfully one of them was traded already)
Didn't even know it was a book. Rented the movie this summer to show my wife who had never seen it. Was afraid it would be dated and it wouldn't be as funny as the 1st time I saw it but it still works.
Are you allowed in SM? I know they accept the homeless but I thought they drew the line on Republicans:)
go with an outfield of
bradley
drew
nomar
cruz
ledee
and werth on the DL to start the season
including werth, we would have 5 outfielders that can play all 3 outfield positions and only nomar being the crappy left fielder. And with the depth, it will be easier when someone eventually goes down with injury.
Ok, thinking in terms of opportunity costs- we could save the $7 million a year he likely to get, play Werth instead, who is likely to be more productive and give the money to the bearded one.
Jacque Jones or Bearded One & Werth?
Not to mention that solid .315 OBP in the Minnesota bandbox.
Ahem...what was his OBP as of April 20?
He's been a great defensive left fielder and okay RF. He would have been a CF for the Twins if they didn't have someone named Hunter. If he was platooned he should post a >800 OPS. If he plays against LHP he might as well bat 9th. His splits are huge and really shouldn't be allowed to face LHP. He's a much better option then Pierre or Gathright because he does have legitimate power and the Dome played as nuetral for LHH Home runs in 2005. Jones actually has more power from the left side then Milton but his OB is lower.
It's a shortstop Merry-go-Round.
Tivo, yes, it's what's for TV.
Bob, sheer genius! (what used to be... and still rightly is... said about Guiness)
I'm sad there's no chance of me coming to a DT book signing or other get together. Although, I do have plans to go see the Cards with my Grandfather, father, uncle and my son. Alas, it won't be the Dodgers!
It looks like ESPN insider is claiming that Toronto is interested in Bradley. Since I don't get insider, I cannot get the details.
It would be neat to have an outfielder named after sports equipment. If you can't be an athlete be an athletic supporter.
Jacque Jones is both!
204. A.Martinez was on their show yesterday afternoon giving them percent chances of each Dodger FA/trade being true. He said that Morris signing with LAD was > 50%, he said Abreu and ManRam were 0%... there were a few others that I can't recall, as that Phoebe Cates pool scene has clouded my mind.
vr, Xei
Parts of St. Louis are very reminscent of South L.A.
A teacher at my high school claimed to have attended the real Ridgemont High a few years behind Spicoli and the gang. He went to high school in the Valley (Sherman Oaks, I think). He said that the characters in the movie pretty accurately portrayed real people.
221
I'm not a big fan of Jacque Jones for the reason you point out: low OBP. But one point in his favor is he's apparently a very good corner OF, good enough that he could even play a decent CF if need be (i.e., if/when J.D. Drew misses time).
2004 Season
Burdened by worries about his father's health and his status with the team, Jacque Jones never seemed comfortable and carefree in 2004. Still, he produced power, but lost points off his batting average and endured prolonged slumps at a point in his career when he was expected to improve his patience and consistency. He enjoyed a productive Division Series against New York in the days following his father's death.
Hitting
Jones has tremendous bat speed that can drive a fastball a long way. In late 2003 and last spring, he looked like he was increasing his patience and selectivity at the plate, but often looked overeager during the summer. When he slumps, Jones tends to swing at virtually anything near the dish early in the count. He will get himself in a hole and his at-bats will last a matter of seconds. As his salary increases, he will need to improve in these areas to remain an everyday player for a good team. Greater patience would generate a better on-base percentage, as well as better power numbers, because he'd be swinging at better pitches to hit.
Baserunning & Defense
A smart, aggressive baserunner, Jones isn't blindingly fast, but can steal the occasional base. He's one of the best-fielding corner outfielders in the game in terms of range, but continues to have trouble finding his release point on throws. One might fly to the backstop, and the next might roll to the cutoff man. His throws aren't consistent enough to play right field in many stadiums besides the Metrodome, which has a shallow right-field fence.
2005 Outlook
There's a lot of talent in Jones' body, and he has demonstrated the work ethic and attentiveness required to still improve. An emotional man, Jones could benefit from a more peaceful 2005. If he can combine his raw power and bat speed with a little more patience and a higher on-base percentage, he could become a borderline All-Star talent. If he doesn't progress, he could wind up platooning somewhere.
This is appalling in 160 pa's vs LHP:
.201/.247/.370
vs. RHP:
Jones .268/.348/.466
Ledee .286/.340/.447
and he made $5,000,000 last year at age 30. Yech.
The emotional side of me struggles with all the posts talking about how Izturis isn't very good, but I have to admit being pursuaded by them.
I think I am being easily fooled by how he plays defense: not the objective view, the statistical view, but the visual view.
I have had the pleasure of some good seats at PacBell (whatchamacallit) Park when I've seen the Dodgers in the past few years, 1st baseline, looking directly at the pitcher and shortstop. Cesar Izturis simply looked like the most graceful shortstop I ever saw. He seemed to get to every single ball hit his way, even if that involved sliding or falling down to get there, and then he'd rise up and deliver an effortless throw to get the runner by a step.
I call it lyrical. His defense just looked like high quality defense.
If you measure it, maybe the eyes deceive. After all, it doesn't matter how pretty it looks, it just matters that he gets people out.
So I want to give some voice to those who like Izturis, even if it is best for the team to trade him.
Mench
2004-26 HR
2005-25 HR
Jones:
2004- 24 HR
2005- 23 HR
Mr. Ned likes consistency based on the Furcal move and his comments. 25 HR for $5M sounds like a deal compared to $12-15M for 35-40 HR. I'm trying to think non-sabermetrically here, work with me.
Is Werth supposed to be 100% and ready to go at the beginning of the season?
Does that mean you'd give him 5 million dollars?
Omar Vizquel is pretty good too. Since you have seen them both in person, how would you compare them?
I agree with you that Izturis defense is very important to the team. (or was) I would like to know if his injury is what caused him to crash and burn at the plate last year. If so, there is no reason that he couldn't continue to improve like O Smith did. And, you have got to like his speed on the bases.
Except Jones plays exceptional defense and is rarely hurt. Ledee has the misfortune of having been traded for by the Giants and then putting up the following line 113/200/151 on Colletti's watch. Sure that was a small sample size but he was Choi 2004 Dodger bad. Plus he was a mess physically last year like all our other outfielders. JT was afraid to start him for fear of blowing the hammy which left us with Repko and Edwards stealing at bats.
You can't ignore the splits, just because the Twinkies are ignorant enough to play Jones against LHP doesn't mean Grady Little will be. He sat Trot Nixon against LHP and he wasn't nearly as bad as Jones. Most of you for some reason don't think we need an outfielder. Last year we went into the spring with the same outfield minus Cruz and it killed us. This year the same outfield has had two broken wrists(Drew,Werth), 2 shoulder surgeries(Drew), one knee surgery(Bradley) and one bad back for most of 2004(Cruz) and only Cruz is going to be ready by ST. Only Drew has a chance at being ready by opening day and we all know what a fast healer he is.
I'm not saying Jaque Jones is the answer because his salary might be terrible for his production but we need an outfielder and I'd buy one then trade for one if possible.
JMO
If it wasn't, it's a mighty big coincidence. And in true Dodger fashion, the existence of his injury and its extent were kept secret for a month or more.
At the time of his slump, he was the NL's top hitter for average, then he cratered.
I wouldn't argue Izturis' speed, because he doesn't seem like he's got much of a gift for baserunning. His defense was amazing, and his hitting coming along nicely. What he'll be like when he comes back, I'd just be cautious. TJ surgery is pretty conventional now, but I haven't heard much about the prognosis for a fielder or a hitter.
No, but he'll be ready shortly after that to suffer his next debilitating injury.
I was talking about Werth, not Drew...;)
Yeah, he can't be happy about that signing. Gold Glove RF all year and then ...........
I think a one year solution is okay and Reggie fits the bill.
Isn't "that which makes Guzman special" his offensive numbers as a shortstop, not his offensive numbers per se? I had gotten the impression that he wouldn't be anything special if moved to the outfield.
"'I wouldn't trade Soriano in the first place. Wilkerson [and the second player] Terrmel Sledge could play for a lonnngggg time and never put up the numbers Soriano does. He's an underrated guy for me,' said one assistant GM."
I'm just glad he doesn't work for the dodgers.
Whose next? Marquis Grissom? Oh wait, we already had him. Robby Thompson?
(Kidding aside, tho, I do kinda like Mueller, again, as a stop gap 3b, a good team player and solid. But let's stop there with the former Giants please, Ned.)
I believe that's "San Francisco Giants of Los Angeles."
So Ned is out shopping for outfielders in a sellers market with no talent leverage to exploit in a trade (although I advocate testing the value of Gagne/Kent).
This ain't going to turn out well for the LAD.
Maybe the least worst thing is to buy somebody. Who? Nothing but bad deals out there.
It's highly doubtful that J. Jones will return fair value on the cost to sign him. But J. Jones might not be as bad as other options if he's dumb enough to chose LAD over STLC.
HMS Bounty across from the Ambassador in Koreatown
Barney's Beanery on Santa Monica, West Hollywood
Lucky Baldwin's in Pasadena (200 beers on tap!)
Pete's downtown, 4th and Main
Maybe HSC could stop by. I bet Jon could set that up...
The Red Lion in Silverlake. German beer and food, great place.
The movie was filmed at Van Nuys High.
I still think we should keep Bradley unless we can get solid OF depth in return, if there's some way to rectify the Kent-Bradley situation. If not, then I guess Colletti's hands are indeed tied.
Hmm, can Tejada play OF? ;-)
It's too bad Matt Kemp won't be "ready" enough to help out this year. Or.... will he?
[cue fade out music]
As many here can tell you, i was advocating that the dodgers should keep guzman at ss, he'd be a great ss, but an average to a little above average of,1b,3b depending on how he produces.
That's why i'm not high on the furcal signing, its not the money cause i believe in paying if there are players to pay for, its that guzman would have been a better offensive producer at ss than jeter or nomar, we would have had another alex rodriguez.
Welp, I'm off to play soccer.
c
so you wouldnt take arods production if it was from right field instead of ss?
Of course i would, but to me its all about getting as much power out of the lineup as possible.
Guzman in rf takes up a power position, having guzman at ss allows for another power bat in rf.
Its all about maximizing the power in the lineup, guzman (as you have said) 40 bombs at ss, furcal 10-15 bombs at ss.
I'll take guzman at ss over furcal.
I think we're at the point where the free agents being talked about are solid players with track record while our young guys (Werth, Aybar, Perez) are solid players with no track record. Colleti would be paying very little to feel more assured of what he's getting out of 3B instead of just assuming production from others.
I dont think Colleti can go wrong either way. We're going to get about the same production whether we bring in Mueller or Jones or whether we let the holdovers play. It'll just cost a few extra million for the former to get a known quantity.
I said average TO A LITTLE ABOVE AVERAGE, not average to a little below average.
you are having tunnel vision. if we get 30 homeruns from guzman at right field and 30 homeruns from kemp at lf, along with 30 homeruns form laroche at 3b, we have enough power in the lineup.
there are more factors in having a good offense besides power. balance is key.
I'm all about obp and slg or ops, the higher the team ops is the better.
I'm not into speed and defense, unless it comes along with guys with high ops (the full package).
defense is the new OBP, in terms of being undervalued.
I will provide a six pack of Diet Coke.
And make coffee or tea.
I would think that Furcal's $13 million/year contract is an indication that defense is not undervalued.
I didn't like Depo's Valentin signing, but I waited to see his plan unfold. Even if the major injury bug didn't befall the club, Valentin would have been a waste of $3 mils. The only redeeming thing about it is that it was only for 1 year. I sure hope the 2 year rumors about Mueller are wrong.
My heart skipped a beat when I saw that. Unfortunately, it's Todd, not Jacque.
I don't get that, is that a moneyball thing, a cutting corners thing to try to fit into a budget?
I'm not a moneyball guy, as i've said before spend the money if there are guys to spend the money on.
I'm a sabermetrics stat guy willing to spend money if the players are there.
Orlando Hudson was more valuable than Soriano 2 years ago. Last year, I think it was pretty close.
The LAD have employed Guzman since July 2001 and by now have a good idea about what he can and cannot do.
By all accounts, the LAD believe Guzman is ill suited to stick at major league shorstop.
The LAD are known to be wrong about a few things, but it's logical to trust them on this one.
It's a pretty simple evaluation to make whether a fourth-year minor leaguer rojects as a major league shortstop. When the kid is one of your own and your coaches and scouts get to see nearly every game he plays, it's even more simple.
Guzman's size works against him in the shorstop projectiions. In February he was listed at 6-foot-6, 225 pounds. He turned 21 just last month so he could be 6-7, 240 any day now.
The Dodgers' projection for him to end up at 1B or RF seem entirely reasonable, regardless of his offensive talents, and probably factors into the decision to invest $39 million in Furcal.
Which is sort of like confusing Ted Williams with No Neck Williams.
i mean, an outfielder putting up a richie sexson type line is still pretty darn good for power numbers.
Defense is not the new OBP. Defense is still over-rated by most baseball people. Rafael furcal might have been under-rated as a defender, but defense as a whole is still over-rated. Also, defense is not even close to OBP in its contribution to winning ball games.
AMEN BROTHER.
1. Chad Billingsley, rhp
2. Andy LaRoche, 3b
3. Joel Guzman, ss/2b
4. Russell Martin, c
5. Jonathan Broxton, rhp
6. Scott Elbert, lhp
7. Blake DeWitt, 3b
8. Matt Kemp, of
9. Etanislao Abreu, 2b
10. Chin-Lung Hu, ss
If your a sabermetric guy then why are you obsessing over OPS? Plenty of better metrics then OPS for determining a players worth these days. Furcal had an OPS of < 800 and was still one of the best offensive players in the NL last year. In offense alone he was a top 25 using VORP. Throw in his defense and using Warp1 he was a top 10. Rafy was a more valuable player then Adam Dunn last year. OPS is nice and simple but it is not the end all.
303
Nate I'm of the opinion that once JdT moves to RF he'll concentrate on offense and quickly start showing major progress in his game. People throw 30-35 home runs around like anyone can do it. This isn't 2001.
Your plan has to depend on your whole ballclub. You can't have a crappy infield if your employing a GB staff and the last I looked the Dodgers don't exactly miss to many bats in the starting rotation.
my guess was
billingsley
guzman
laroche
martin
elbert
kemp
broxton
dewitt
orenduff
loney
Someone else should bring dip.
Abreu 9 and Hu 10 are surprising.
Still that is a sweet top 10.
What's your stance on double-dipping?
My scout had
Chad Billingsley, rhp
Joel Guzman, 3b/rf
Andy LaRoche, 3b
Russell Martin, c
Jonathan Broxton, rhp
Scott Elbert, lhp
Loney, 1st
Matt Kemp, of
Tiffany, lhp
Kuo, lhp
Denker, 2b
Blake DeWitt, 3b
Chin-Lung Hu, ss
Etanislao Abreu, 2b
Aybar, 2b/3b
as his top 15
We're all friends. Share the communicable diseases.
does BA know something we dont...
i dont have a BA subscription, but i buy the books. but i would like to know what they say about the 1-10 prospects...
Not online, but if you buy the book they go 30 deep.
last year, he was rated as having the best curveball in the system, and this year in a BA chat a couple of months ago someone said he only has average stuff across the board.
but on a good note, last yr, BA said billingsley has the best slider in the org, now this year they say he has the best curveball in the org. So if he still has last years slider, along with this years curve.... cbills the unstoppable force!?!
Is anybody gonna be participating in the chat tomorrow? I will be at work but can somebody ask a question for me? Id really appreciate it. Here goes:
When the BA staff is comparing stats between the Jacksonville players and other teams' players how much do they take into account the size of the ballpark the suns play in?
"Martin is similar to former Dodgers catcher Paul LoDuca, with better defensive skills and slightly less offensive ability. He'll probably begin 2006 in Triple-A but could reach Los Angeles in the second half."
Baseball America's top 10 prospect list: http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/05top10s/dodgers.html
No mention of Heart? What about Soul?
"One scout described Vero Beach's double-play combo of Hu and Abreu as "the traveling circus show" because of their penchant for defensive highlights. Hu finished second to Abreu in the Florida State League batting race, then hit .343 for Taiwan at the World Cup tournament following the season."
what...
The LAD have employed Guzman since July 2001 and by now have a good idea about what he can and cannot do.
By all accounts, the LAD believe Guzman is ill suited to stick at major league shorstop.
And yet the manager keeps writing SS next to his name in the lineup just for everyone's amusement. Until he is not a shortstop he is a shortstop(Say that 3 times out loud). You don't keep getting taller at 21 when you are already 6'5(in most cases)
No but you get thicker and heavier and that is what will move him off of SS. Since they now have a SS they need to get him playing a new position ASAP so his bat can be of some use by late 2006 or 2007.
Also, the only other SS prospect whose name I know is in A ball. So, somebody had to play SS in Jax.; JtD needed ABs.
I agree, I'd take Tiffany and Loney over Abreu but Abreu has skills. They raved about Hu's defensive ability saying his range is "extraordinary"
i have dewitt penciled in as the 2b of the future :)
I don't think anyone has taken into account the effect of bad defense, particularly in the infield, on groundball pitchers such as Lowe, Weaver. I mean, it can ruin a pitcher's psyche if routine groundballs scoot through the infield.
Not to mention the job of the catcher to keep the pitcher's confidence, handle the pitchers, etc...
You lost me at trombone Andrew, sorry.
Do you mean trumpet > trombone?!
You all have your points but it is not an open and shut case. No matter what BA tells you. That's my point.
"Hey, lookee, here, if I slide his big thing in and out of this brass tube while I blow into it, I can make different notes?"
His changeup, which he grips like his fastball except for sliding his index finger to the side of the ball, improved but remains rudimentary
i dont have a baseball by me, but isnt that almost the same as a split/forkball?
maybe that is why it's rudimentary. he thinks his splitter is a change up.
He went on to have a pretty good year in Triple-A at age 22 and did some good things in September for the LAD.
Well, I've seen much more of Izturis from that vantage point than Vizquel, simply because Vizquel was a Jint only in 2005 and I only go to Whatchamacallit Park when the Dodgers play.
That disclaimer aside: Izturis is said to have grown up idolizing Vizquel, but in terms of style of play, there is no comparison. Vizquel is flashier. He makes hard plays look hard (though executes on them well, so that you think what he is doing is incredible). Izturis, on the other hand, makes hard plays look easy. I get the feeling from being that close that Izturis is really doing something special. He is concentrating so well that he makes the plays the way they are supposed to be made: proper positioning of the body, proper stance when throwing... and the gracefulness of how he gets to those fundamental positions is astounding.
Vizquel: well, he gets to the same balls, but it looks like it is harder to do what he does than it might actually be. I get the feeling that it is even harder to do what Izturis does (set up properly for a ball that's so far out of range).
243 I don't know defensive stats well enough, but it is encouraging to know that his stats tend to show what I've observed isn't a trick of the eye.
That said, I was sad to see him injured this year, since if he could put up an .800 OPS for a season (as opposed to a couple of months), it would seem to make him an all-star caliber shortstop. We may never get to know, with the Furcal signing. But many here seem to posit that Furcal is comparable on defense and clearly better on offense, so there you go.
Homeruns combined or individually?
nah, just two tommy john surgeries. nothing out of the ordinary.
Deal
So Gagne at 5/60, or should we just go for the 7/100 Bluu Plate Special?
what are the names of the other two? burgandy and magenta?
It appears the LAD in fact will move Guzman off shorstop but there was no urgency to do it this year. Not like it hurt him to stay there, and they have given spot duty at other spots.
Sorry if I led you to believe a concern is that he could grow much taller. That's unlikely. It's more his overall size. As he fills out, he easily could reach 240, 250.
But again, this really comes down to the LAD knowing him better than anyone. They say he'll eventually have to move off SS.
Indeed it's alluring to think that he could be a SS, but it probably qualifies as wishful thinking.
Some scouts also doubt his aptitude as an infielder at any spot. They saying his actions aren't the most assertive, that the speed of some plays troubles him.
I bet he's a starting RF in the majors at age 25.
You're telling me. I started on the trumpet, but switched because "my lips were too large".
368-
I agree, Lowe was not as advertised last year. Seems like everytime he pitched, he gave up a couple of first inning jacks. But how much of those were due to frustration over infield defense. K. Brown would constantly melt down over too many groundballs going through.
You're telling me. I started on the trumpet, but switched because "my lips were too large".
368-
I agree, Lowe was not as advertised last year. Seems like everytime he pitched, he gave up a couple of first inning jacks. But how much of those were due to frustration over infield defense. K. Brown would constantly melt down over too many groundballs going through.
so guzman is going to spend 4 years in vegas?
do you still candy from babies as well? Tell young children that there is no Santa Claus? pick the wings off butterfly's? . Give me my Guzman at SS "wishful thinking". Why the rush to grow up so soon?
And those Abreu rumors are true, too... right?
No question, Aybar's total of five HR is poor for a 3B in the PCL. If he goes back to Triple-A this year, he'll need to show more power.
But overall, I wouldn't call it a subpar year for a 22-year-old in his first Triple-A season.
Reputedly he was slightly above average at 3B.
His OBP was .356, his slugging .419. Not great, but respectable, maybe "pretty good" for a PCL rookie who turned 22 in March.
True, Las Vegas is a great hitters park. For what it's worth, Aybar hit .330 on the road.
His walk/strikeout ratio of 4/5.6 was pretty good, too, although he probably needs to walk a bit more. He had 40 walks, 401 at-bats.
Frank Sinatra says he learned to sing from listening to Tommy Dorsey play the trombone.
My two cents on the "does defense matter very much" debate is that I can't believe it's even a debate. I'm all about not going overboard on any one aspect of baseball--that's why there are 9 players out there. One would quickly tire of a team entirely consisting of slow-footed, stone-handed mashers who also walk a lot. If you had two teams like that playing against each other, it would make the MLB not too different from Little League.
Venezuelan accent: "I'm a real boy now"
Don't trust the ex-Met...
I see Guzman spending next year in Triple A, with a late callup.
In 2007, maybe he cracks the lineup, but a lot of rookies got back down at least once, so maybe he yo-yo's a bit.
In 2008, I see him holding a full-time job.
So make it 24 years old, not 25 until after that season.
Grady's brain cramps: Not just Pedro
http://msn.foxsports.com/mlb/story/5148452
You're certainly with the majority on Aybar. BA and the LAD regard him as a utility man. So do many scouts.
I like that he has a broad set of skills. I love his durability. He's only 22 yet has played a ton of professional baseball.
No question, the power has to improve. If it doesn't, Aybar might not find the playing time to even become a good utility guy.
One bad year in LV, and he could quickly get lost in the shuffle, but I think maybe it's good for him that he's flying under the radar a little.
C
why didnt they come ask for izturis :(
So much for his durability.
"Bowden not done improving Nationals."
--throws grenade and runs away--
Damn I can't think of anything funny with Gepetto as a Dodger. Damn you and your repko as a cricket reference.
I pass.
it works bowden!
423 - Haha
425 - I think he has. Didn't he write a book review on Amazon.com that got blown a bit out of proportion?
I think his book about Fenway was controversial. He is the only Bill James, objective type I know of at ESPN. I enjoy his insights.
Neyer lives in Portland and only appears on TV rarely. He does more work on radio.
Neyer's book about Fenway wasn't controversial, it just didn't sell well. He posted a review on Amazon of someone else's book on a day at Fenway under a false name and panned it, but he later fessed up to it.
It's the first review listed on Amazon.com for Steve Kettmann's "One Day at Fenway".
Who knew you were starting a trend for the stars?
"With new leadership now completely in place, the Dodgers look to return to their old winning ways. Jayson Stark explains."
Old as in 2004?
go to link to read more!
http://tinyurl.com/7ly6a
Free agent Bill Mueller still is at the top of the Dodgers' third-base wish list, but no deal appears imminent. Without naming names, Colletti seemed to hint that celebrated prospect Andy LaRoche might be ready to come to the big leagues and play every day despite never having played above Double-A.
"You have to be willing to give some younger players a chance," said Colletti, who added he wouldn't be opposed to having as many as three or four rookies on the opening-day roster.
Kuo, Broxton, Billingsley, and LaRoche? Though if LaRoche might be given a chance, wouldn't Colleti first give it to Aybar and Perez? You'd think LaRoche needs more than half of a season at AA.
"Phillips, who is eligible for arbitration for the first time after making $339,000 last year, will be traded if the Dodgers can make a deal. If not, he will be non-tendered and become a free agent."
A close second was calling Navaro "rifle armed." He is a good catcher but come on, he wasn't exactly gunnin' em down.
Ugueth Urbina is only a 2 time all star
I know people make mistakes, but it's hard to fathom a mistake that gargantuan made by someone who is paid to know better. That article only drives that point home, rehashing the repeated errors of planning and strategic anticipation. I'd much rather have a Scoscia with small ball tendencies but sharp game roster management skills than a guy that bungles his bullpen and bench on a nightly basis. I know his supporters point to his record, but what were the pythagorean w-l for his teams? I'm not sure where to look that up. Did they underperform?
I'm pretty optimistic about the Dodgers in general right now, but I think we have something pretty special in Grady Gump.
I understand that Aybar's numbers at the end of the year maybe inflated and pitchers will adjust, but if you are going to take a risk it strikes me this would be the position to do it at.
There is some discussion within the organization about starting the season with 21-year-old right-hander Chad Billingsley in the rotation, which would lessen the urgency to add another starter.
*Alfonso Soriano said he has no intention of playing outfield for the Nationals. "I'm going to play second base," Soriano said.
"I don't think they want me to play the outfield," he said. "I think that if they traded for me, it's to play second base. Obviously I have the control. Of course I'm not going to play the outfield."*
You had me up until "He would just run out to the field faster than Choi and dibs it." I'm guessing J-Phil had to rely more on misdirection than on fleetness of foot.
His numbers look pretty good. The Yankees' concern, allegedly, is he's never been a regular. That might not be the Dodgers' problem.
http://tinyurl.com/a3caa
He also writes " The light-hitting Navarro also was surprisingly productive at the plate."
Is it just me or are most writers off when describing Navarro? I thought his reputation was that of a Solid defensive catcher who calls a good game and has a solid (but not spectacular) arm.
Offensively I had always heard of him having excellent plate discipline and good power to the gaps (for a catcher). Adding to his value was that he is a switch hitter.
He has performed well at every level of the minors despite being very young. He's only 21 and already has half a season of Major League experience under his belt.
I would be more than satisfied with Navarro as our catcher of the future. He has already showed last season that he is something special. He should only gets better as he matures and His body fully develops.
So, could Wilkerson be flipped for a starting pitcher?
I seriously doubt it.
Think again, terse-boy! Odalis Perez, left-hander extraordinaire, can be yours!
Later in the column, this writer refers to the other outfield trade-bait, Keven Mensch, as "Big Head."
Wow the resemblance is uncanny. Judging from his "paragraph" structure, I would be surprised if this guy didn't have the same English 101 professor as Plaschke.
Here are my favorite parts...
"With Sori's game, the pros outweigh the cons. That means bat compared with glove."
"And don't give me all your seam-headed statistical mumbo-jumbo. Check the overall plate numbers. Better yet, watch the damn games."
"Sori can play on my team anytime."
"And an intangible was his clubhouse demeanor."
Sounds like Plaschke moping about the departure of the great Alex Cora.
...sounds like "I'm only concerned with data that doesn't challenge my assumptions."
In other words: "Hey, Mueller... I can take or leave you, since I can always try my real prospects at third... So how about you take a few million less if you'd like to sign with us?"
no way, soriano is the typical bowden player. flashy, toolsy, and sucky.
i should have known before when all ths soriano rumors were flying. Never count bowden out if there is a toolsy player available!
I'd look at Texas though, who seems to be looking to move Wilkerson. The ol' Odalis for Wilkerson deal could still be viable.
http://tinyurl.com/8bk24
Having said that I have no idea who that should be, but it sounds as if Alomar would fit the bill.
I have the utmost confidence in the 49ers ability to lose the big one.
And again, does the veteran role model for Martin and Navarro specifically have to be an on-field catcher, or can it be a combo of an off-field catcher and an on-field pitcher or position player? I'm open-minded on this, but I'm not convinced that the need for a veteran catcher on the roster isn't a myth.
Of course, if people feel Martin could use more seasoning in the minors, that's another story.
489 - Right on. It's definitely a question worth debating - I don't see a definitive right or wrong answer yet.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.