Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
What follows is a reference guide for Dodger player contract information, which I'll link to on the sidebar and update periodically.
Sandy Alomar, Jr.
2006: $650,000
Danys Baez
2006: $4,000,000
Yhency Brazoban
2005: $319,500
Hee Seop Choi
2005: $351,500
2006: $725,000, guaranteed if on Opening Day roster. (Guarantee of $118,852 if cut before the final two weeks of Spring Traning, guarantee of $178,278 if cut during final two weeks of Spring Training.)
Jose Cruz, Jr.
2006: $2,910,000, plus up to $300,000 in potential incentives
2007: $4,500,000 or $300,000 buyout
J.D. Drew
2005: $9,000,000, plus $2 million signing bonus
2006: $11,000,000, with player option to exit contract at end of season
2007: $11,000,000
2008: $11,000,000
2009: $11,000,000
Rafael Furcal
2006: $5,000,000 signing bonus and $4 million salary
2007: $13,000,000
2008: $13,000,000
2009: $4,000,000 deferred payment in January
Eric Gagne
2005: $8,000,000
2006: $10,000,000
2007: Team option: $12,000,000 or $1,000,000 buyout. (Gagne can then void the team option and receive a buyout of $250,000 to $1 million, depending games finished the next two years.)
Nomar Garciaparra
2006: $6,000,000, plus $500,000 for every 25 plate appearances beyond 375, up to $4,000,000 (with half of the incentive money deferred without interest)
2007: $7,500,000 plus $250,000 in incentives for 500 plate appearances
2008: $8,500,000 plus $250,000 in incentives for 500 plate appearances
2009-2010: $2,500,000 signing bonus from contract of November 19, 2006
Luis Gonzalez
2007: $7,350,000
D.J. Houlton
2005: $316,000
Toby Hall
2006: $2,250,000 plus plate-apperance incentives, maxing out at $250,000 for 500 plate appearances
Mark Hendrickson
2006: $1,950,000 plus an additional $25,000 at 185 and 200 innings pitched.
(Note: Dodgers received $1,000,000 in cash from Tampa Bay at time of acquisition.)
Kazuhisa Ishii
2006: $1,300,000 (share of payment for option year buyout)
Cesar Izturis
2005: $2.35 million ($2.05 million in salary, $300,000 signing bonus), plus $150,000 incentive clause for Gold Glove
2006: $3.1 million, plus $150,000 incentive clause for Gold Glove
2007: $4.15 million, plus $150,000 incentive clause for Gold Glove
2008: $5,700,000 or $300,000 buyout, plus $150,000 incentive clause for Gold Glove
Andruw Jones
2008: $9,000,000 plus $5,100,000 signing bonus
2009: $15,000,000 plus $2,100,000 signing bonus
2010: $5,000,000 signing bonus
Jeff Kent
2005: $7,600,000
2006: $9,400,000
2007: $9,000,000 plus $2,000,000 signing bonus and possible $750,000 in plate-appearance incentives
2008: Guaranteed $9,000,000 if he has 550 plate appearances in 2007. Otherwise, team option of $7,500,000 or buyout of $500,000.
Hiroki Kuroda
2007: $7,300,000 signing bonus
2008: $5,000,000
2009: $10,000,000
2010: $13,000,000
Ricky Ledee
2005: $1,000,000
2006: $1,500,000
Mike Lieberthal
2007: $1,150,000
2008: $1,400,000 team option, which could also trigger based on plate appearances, or $100,000 buyout
Kenny Lofton
2005: $3,100,000
2006: $3,500,000 plus a $350,000 signing bonus, with $50,000 incentives for 350, 400 and 450 plate appearances.
Derek Lowe
2005: $7,500,000
2006: $9,000,000
2007: $9,500,000
2008: $10,000,000
Ramon Martinez
2006: $700,000
2007: $800,000
Bill Mueller
2006: $4,250,000
2007: $4,500,000
2008: $750,000 deferred payment
Brad Penny
2005: $5,100,000
2006: $4,500,000 plus $1,000,000 bonus
2007: $7,000,000 plus $1,000,000 bonus
2008: $8,500,000 plus $1,000,000 bonus
2009: Team option: $9,250,000 or $2,000,000 buyout
Juan Pierre
2007: $7,500,000
2008: $8,000,000
2009: $10,000,000
2010: $10,000,000
2011: $8,500,000
Odalis Perez
2005: $3,000,000
2006: $7,250,000, plus $2,250,000 in deferred signing bonus, with incentives of $150,000 for 185 innings, again at 200 innings, and $200,000 for 215 innings
2007: $7,750,000, plus $2,250,000 in deferred signing bonus, with incentives of $150,000 for 185 innings, again at 200 innings, and $200,000 for 215 innings
2008: $9,000,000, with incentives of $150,000 for 185 innings, again at 200 innings, and $200,000 for 215 innings, or $1,500,000 buyout
Jason Repko
2005: $316,000
Olmedo Saenz
2005: $650,000
2006: $1,000,000
2007: $1,000,000
Takashi Saito
2007: $1,000,000 plus $25,000 each for finishing 30, 35, 40 and 45 games, $50,000 each for finishing 50 and 55 games and $100,000 for finishing 60 games.
Duaner Sanchez
2005: $332,000
Steve Schmoll
2005: $316,000
Jason Schmidt
2007: $12,500,000
2008: $12,000,000
2009: $12,000,000
2010-2011: $10,500,000 signing bonus due
Brett Tomko
2006: $3,600,000
2007: $4,100,000
2008: $4,500,000 or $1,000,000 buyout or player opt-out
Jayson Werth
2005: $337,000
Randy Wolf
2007: $8,000,000
2008: $9,000,000 club option (automatic with 180 innings pitched in 2007) or $500,000 buyout
Kelly Wunsch
2005: $550,000
2006: $650,000, non-guaranteed, with bonuses of $25,000 at 40, 50 and 60 appearances.
And people thought we'd be able to trade him...
It would be great if you had a list of players with options and how many they have.
I'm trying to figure out who has options out of all of these guys:
osoria
schmoll
kuo
jackson
houlton
choi
aybar
robles
repko
If you know any information on options of the above players, i'd appreciate the info.
8 - Yeah, you're right - it's only partially guaranteed. I'll look that up.
Cool, thanks Jon.
It doesn't contain a standard-guarantee provision, meaning Choi receives only a percentage of his salary if he is released before Opening Day. If he is cut during the final two weeks of camp, Choi will get $178,278. If he is cut earlier than that, he will receive $118,852.
Yuck.
Pass the egg nog indeed.
My father tried that (he owned a convenience store and often had some left over).
As I recall, it didn't taste very good. This was just the non-alcoholic egg nog in the carton, not the mix that is already seasoned and liquored up.
Thanks Bob.
Ever tried it with coffee (it works with alcohol and without)?
(A crisp winter day in Los Angeles. A boy sweating profusely enters an apartment rubbing his shoulder. He is a third grader and wondering about the meaning of "Christmas vacation." His father is on the internet.)
BOY: "Dad?"
MAN: "Yes, my son."
BOY: "Can I stop throwing the baseball now?"
MAN: (Dad reads Odalis Perez contract details) "No."
I may be in the minority but I still think JD Drew's contract isn't that relatively bad if he stops being fastball-on-wrist-prone.
http://tinyurl.com/7mnrk
Maybe he could switch to putting for a while?
(Also, the article reports that Woods owns a 155-foot yacht called "Privacy." OK, we get it, but that's a pretty lame name for a boat.)
Didn't he have only about three interceptions all year before today?
The score is now worse than Stanford's 23-3 opening deficit last night.
Izturis for over 4 million in 2007? I guess if he hit like 2004 that would be palatable.
It is hard to imagine Lowe, Odalis and Penny being worth the money in the latter parts of their contracts.
I guess I always thought that because DePo was a sharp guy who really wanted to learn the game, he would make good moves. Some of these pitcher contracts look pretty bad, though.
There is some consolation in knowing that the things DePo was hung in effigy for (LoDuca, Beltre, being from Harvard) have nothing to do with these questionable deals.
Bob is laughing. Direct your invitation toward Penarol instead.
I think 12.5 mils for 3 spare parts could have been turned into 1 star level player.
Trying to keep it family-oriented here.
Which school is the Pac-10 counterpart?
As for snobbishness, they are just the Vandy/Stanford/Duke of the Big 11 in that regard.
Why can't Dorell get 4 quarters out of his team. I veiw these comebacks as a coaching failure not a victory. If they are able to comeback at will why can't he get them up for the game in the first place so as to not fall behind by 20.
No Pac-10 school has alums like Northwestern's. The two private schools (USC and Stanford) generally have normal alums.
Probably the closest would be UCLA alums. (Disclosure: Lifetime member of the UCLA Alumni Association)
SB -- another option?
At UCLA-Stanford football games, you can generally just joke back and forth between the two groups.
The Northwestern alums treated everyone else like they were algae.
Will Kobe be able to feed his family?
As someone who lives in the shadow of the Rose Bowl and holds the Grandaddy of Them All in great reverence, the Wildcat fans should have been more respectful, especially since they hadn't been out since 1949.
I know several very nice Stanford and Northwestern alums, but they all have that arrogance that makes them think that they went to better school than you did.
In all fairness, I was very disappointed with Georgetown's campus.
U of C would be Gamorrah only if being a nerd was a sin. Things got so bad there that the administration decided to move the shorten the library's hours so it closed at midnight in order to encourage actual student socializing and it caused a protest highlighted by the sign "My parents aren't spending $35,000 a year so that I can learn to tap a keg."
Can't say as I did.
Georgetown is smaller and older, but it's certainly lovely. I admit I was shocked at how much smaller it was than Stanford.
Stanford is getting too built up now, though.
I do find it a little hard to believe that people visting Georgetown would spend an entire weekend complaining about the campus. It's not like being stuck in a lousy hotel room - it has no direct impact on you. Clearly, it seems to have happened, but it's just strange in and of itself.
I may be in the minority but I still think JD Drew's contract isn't that relatively bad if he stops being fastball-on-wrist-prone.
What is so bad about J.D. Drew being the best fastball hitter in the league?
It is okay if he can hit fastballs, but we need somebody on base before him so the pitcher has to throw the heat.
Personally, I'm surprised that anyone who has attended a game at Northwestern's football stadium would complain about the Rose Bowl, since the only advantage that it has is that it is very close to an El stop.
Neither stadium was known for its amenities. But Stanford is having a major renovation now.
During my one visit there, Stanford allowed fans to bring beer and other alcohol into the stadium. That was in 1987.
This is a game between 2 schools that I came close to attending. I often wonder what my life would have been like had I gone to Northwestern. I got into the journalism school, which is a pretty big deal. I didn't enjoy my campus visit. My parents didn't like the tuition, and the rest is history. I guess, to answer my own question, had I gone there, I would be a jerk.
Yes, you were saved from a life that you would have had to have led facing my scorn.
FOREVER.
Consider yourself fortunate.
Hell hath no fury like a Timmermann scorned.
I thought Northwestern students were supposed to be smart, but kicking a second onside kick to the same guy after he's burned you once seems like a missed learning experience.
He's the first Pac-10 player to have 2 kickoff returns for TDs in a game since Anthony Davis did it against Notre Dame in 1972.
Rocket Ismail had two games with 2 kickoff returns for TDs.
And I was rooting for Northwestern because their fans seemed a nicer bunch than UCLA's.
Follow the link to vote:
http://www.redreporter.com/story/2005/12/20/21158/982
Boooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!
Scorn away, Mr. UCLA.
vr, Xei
Haven't seen Geisha the movie but it is a beautifully written book. Two movies in a week-isn't that some sort of personal record.:-)
http://fantasybaseball.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_main.asp?sport=MLB&show=NL&id=7247
I should probably go to bed now. Give Allison a diaper change for me.
--Starting Brian Myrow at 1st.
--Having Milton bunt in front of Kent
--Starting Jason Phillips at 1st
--Batting Oscar Robles in the #3 spot
--Batting Izturis leadoff
--Bunting Drew/Choi in the same game
--Batting Jason Repko in the #2 spot
I cant honestly can see Grady Little making similar mistakes, if he remembers how he made his lineup in Boston.
Tracy can have Edwards, Gio Carrara, Sean Casey, Joe Randa...
--Izzy/Robles combining for 8-24 in SB's.
I'm still amazed that DePo put up with it, and did so with class.
I'm still amazed that DePo put up with it, and did so with class.
I'm not sure "class" is the word I would use. I actually lost respect for Depo because of his unwillingness to get rid of Tracy despite the obvious need to do so.
DePo tried to deal with Tracy by Tracy-proofing his roster. In retrospect, that was a colossal mistake. A good GM has to be more ruthless than that. DePodesta seemed to believe that rational thought would eventually enlighten everybody and guide their actions. Paul, ask yourself, when has that ever been the case?
Colletti looks like a guy who keeps a rusty, jagged-edged knife in his desk, just in case the nice guy act doesn't work.
Exactly. That was always my concern with Paul. While he may have been Sabremetrically "correct" to discount everything that wasn't a statistic, experience has shown that other things cannot be ignored completely. You at least have to pay lip service to them.
What do you mean by superior evaluation skills? Are you referring to the architects of the 2005 LAD? Not clear on what you are saying exactly.
Consequently, DePo deployed overvalued major league assets like Paul LoDuca, as well as salary savings, to enhance the team as best as one could, bringing in Brad Penny, J.D. Drew, Jeff Kent, Milton Bradley, Derek Lowe, Jayson Werth, Hee Seop Choi, Yhency Brazoban, Jose Cruz, Jr. and Dioner Navarro--along with many lesser role-players. Not to rehash what has been endlessly rehashed, but had the 2005 Dodgers managed to avoid an unusual wave of injuries, the team would've likely been a marginal contender, with an intact chain of great prospects for the future. In an ideal world, DePo might've filled the team's short-term needs with even better players, but the ones he found available on the market mostly played well, when healthy.
What's noteworthy is that Ned Colletti, supposedly a follower of a player evaluation methodology much different from DePo's, has essentially pursued the same strategy: Don't let go of the prospects, use FA cash to plug the short-term holes. He apparently agrees with DePo on the continued value of Navarro, Lowe, Drew, Penny and Cruz; only on Choi do they apparently disagree.
My point was that knowing what constitutes a good ballplayer is evidently not enough for a GM to be successful. DePodesta's firing was unjustified, but it was his weakness as a leader that led to it. His inability to handle Jim Tracy was a glaring flaw.
Given more time, would DePo have developed the decisiveness and leadership insights needed to be a complete GM? Probably. He might've been promoted to GM too early in his career.
Interesting.
Am I right to assume you believe Depodesta showed himself to be a "superior" evaluator of player talent? Are you saying superior to the "average" GM or superior to Jim Tracy?
Just trying to be clear.
You find Depo's leadership skills lacking. That seems not only accurate, but critical. Carrying out a vision, communicating well and extracting timely information from both within the industry and the LAD franchise is a critical aspect of being a GM, and leadership plays into it.
Lots of excellent talent evaluators would make for terrible GMs. Some realize it themselves and don't even aspire for a GM job.
While it's hard for us outsiders to grade Depo's leadership skills, I'm inclined to agree with you. I'd give him a D, maybe a D-plus in that area.
Compared with Tracy? Not even close. Tracy valued the cliched "intangibles" over actual performance. He's a hair-shirt baseball guy. Sacrifice bunts and other "productive outs" are a sign of character, whether or not they help you win. Good character is more important than skill. A team full of scrappy character guys would fill out a Tracy roster. Actual baseball talent would be nice-to-have, but inessential, according to Tracyball.
"Oh who will rid me of this vexsome manager?"
I'm not sure what to make of Depo as an evaluator of player talent. Going strictly by his LAD tenure, I'm not sure there's enough there to grade him. Was he any better than Evans on that score? Maybe. He was better than Kevin Malone. Seemed sharper than Chuck Lamar. But he's no Theo Epstein, near as I can tell.
I'd be a little careful about reading too much into Depo's decision to hold onto the prospects who are generally regarded as the best guys: LaRoche, Guzman, Billingsley, Loney, Elbert and Martin. None of those guys had even logged a full season in Double-A. Keeping them was no great challenge.
Don't forget, according to Kevin Towers, in the spring of 2004 Paul Depodesta offered Beltre straight up for Sean Burroughs, a player that Depo/Beane admired greatly while they were in Oakland.
Had Towers said yes, the 2004 Dodgers wouldn't have been so successful. More to the point, the call on Burroughs seemingly was a bad one. Burroughs regressed in 2004 and again in 2005. And what does it say about Depo's valuation of 3B Laroche that he offered Beltre for 3B Burroughs, then just 24?
We could break down a lot of moves. I think Depo actually deserves more credit for trading the prospects he did trade to get Bradley. That was a good move. Admittedly, Depo was fortunate. He inherited a pretty good farm system that enticed the Indians, who also heard from the A's and Pirate; and the timing of Milton's tantrum put the Indians in a bind. But I liked that trade. Althought Franklin Gutirrez is far from a bust, Bradley, for all his problems, gave good returns for low money.
The parallel between Depo and Colletti on holding onto the farm is an interesting one. Might it also reflect Logan White's increased profile within the LAD franchise? Just a thought.
Happy new year to all, lots of interesting reads here.
DePo wasn't operating in a vacuum, of course. For all we know, he marched into McCourt's office in June and demanded Tracy's firing. What we DO know is that Tracy had a powerful supporter in Lasorda, so maybe DePo's hands were tied. Maybe he fell into an impossible situation, trying to implement a vision with little support from the organization.
I don't know this to be true, but it seems as plausible as any scenario.
You say he's no Epstein, dsfan, but Theo had the support of his organization. Oh, and he also had nearly double the payroll.
As to DePodesta, I don't just say this because I'm a history professor or I like cliches, but time will tell. While I think Colletti is following his playbook to an extent, DePo certainly didn't make free agent deals to the extent that Colletti has. And if Tracy was that big a problem for him, DePo should have done basically what Lasorda has done: try to get his way and, if that fails, find his own version of Plaschke to get the word out.
You mean besides O. Perez, Lowe, Kent, and Drew (to mention the major ones only)? That sounds like revisionist history to me. To this point, both DePo and Colletti have been about equally active in the free-agent market, but DePo's moves were higher impact overall, for better or worse.
131 -- Great story!
130--I follow what you mean, but I wasn't trying to do revisionist history. I would say and should have said that Colletti made more of an impression with his signings--rightly or wrongly, for better or worse. Drew, remember, followed the departure of Beltre, and wasn't Perez originally an acquisition?
If you think that Colletti made MORE of an impression with his signings (rather than, say, a different kind of impression), perhaps that's a comment on the way the media has portrayed DePo vs. the way it has portrayed Colletti? But your original comment was about whether or not Colletti had followed DePo's general playbook, and I think to say that the major difference is that Colletti has been more extensive in his use of free agents is inaccurate.
Thanks. I'll be here all week.
That said, I'm still taking SC and giving the points.
*Free agent J.T. Snow is close to signing with the Red Sox, according to the Boston Globe.
The Herald reported yesterday that Boston was Snow's preferred destination. Jan. 1 - 1:37 pm et*
New Year's Resolution for 2006. Don't believe what anybody says.
Speaking of retiring, hasn't Dick Vermeil retired like 5 times? His last "retirement" is resulted in Mike Martz. Damn you, Dick.
http://www.forums.mlb.com/n/mb/message.asp?webtag=ml-dodgers&msg=57514.1&ctx=0
A couple threads about izturis from dodgers.com.
One person said that izturis is the best dodger hitter on the team.
Another said izturis should be playing 2b as soon as he is ready, over kent because he will save a half a run with his defense.
Sometimes it makes me wonder if that board is filled with children, if any of those pro-izturis people are old enough to know better, then they are just (excuse my language) @$$inine.
Interesting that Vermeil's next retirement coincided with Martz' firing.
Here is another pro-izturis thread from dodgers.com.
This person is saying trade kent at the deadline for a starting pitcher and give izturis 2b, "if we are doing good".
LOL, "is izturis another heart and soul guy"?
Sure is a bunch of Mikes fired on the same day.
"Moving runners over with sacrifices is the way to go, remember small ball, its what they used to do before players began to hit home runs."
Classic
Thought it might be interesting to hear the stories of those who post here, and especially the proprietor of this site, Jon, about their earliest memories of becoming a Dodger fan. Maybe the stories could be collected into a thread called The Birth of a Dodger Fan.
Stan from Tacoma
147- Asinine does derive from the latin word for ass, but it's the donkey variety, not the anatomical. It's not profane and doesn't require apology or masking.
What, no mention of Mike Edwards?
I moved to LA in 1959 when the Dodgers were in the WS. I was nine, which is a prime age for falling in love with baseball, and I did.
#159. Link, I don't think the 59 Dodgers are as recognized as later Dodger teams. Sandy Koufax was on that team, but he was not really Sandy until later. Did you see any games in the Colisiem? While I wish I had seen a game at Ebbets Field, I can't say the same for the Colisiem.
Stan from Tacoma
My memory of Ebbetts is a slugfest against the Reds where Kluszewski did damage to the Shaefer Beer scoreboard, and the Dodgers had to bring in the likes of Bud Podbeilan.
As a Met fan my biggest thrills were listening to the west coast games on my transistor radio long after I was supposed to be asleep. This led me to become a huge fan of Sandy Koufax and Juan Marichal, Maury Wills and Willie Mays. I probably heard the last reconstructed game ever played on the radio, a crucial Dodger/Giant game late in the season.
My family moved to California in 1968, and I stayed with the Mets for the next seven years or so--thrilling to the rise of the Tom Seaver team in 1969, the Tug McGraw team of 1973. I followed the Dodgers, but only casually and objectively.
The Dodgers finally got to me in 1977. That was such a memorable team. Not just the stars like Cey, Garvey and Smith, but also the role players like Manny Mota, Vic Davilillo and Lee Lacy. Lasorda's act was still fresh and entertaining; he was a great boost to baseball back then. I spent part of that summer painting, and I'd bring a radio with me to hear the games, and that's the year I also realized that Vin Scully was a miracle--a great storyteller, a baseball educator, a friend. I'd listened to him before, but '77 was the year I began to worship him.
1977: the year of Elvis Costello, Annie Hall and Vin Scully.
I agree that '59 wasn't quite "The Dodgers" like the '60s and 70s teams were, but they were new to the town and so was I, so maybe there's some psychological thing going on there (nah, not really).
http://linkmeister.com/islanders/islradio.htm
Al Michaels may even have done a few when he broadcast them early on, but my memory is of Les Keiter doing PCL games from Portland, Salt Lake, Tacoma, and Albuquerque.
When I was eight in 1973, I remember hearing a voice coming from a transistor radio. It had been on before, but I guess I'd never noticed it. The Dodgers were, I am pretty sure, playing the Reds. I always remembered the score of the game as 5-1 and I just looked on retrosheet.org; if I am right, it was June 23 and Tommy John was the winning pitcher. That day, I heard Vin Scully--really HEARD him. He became my idol at that moment and remains so.
Yet another great episode.
That year, my family went to a game during the first week of the season. Kind of bored, I asked my father which player wore number 15. He came to the plate and my father told me he was left handed and jewish--just like me. Three pitches latter my new favorite player hit the first home run I remember seeing. After that I started following the player who hit before and after my favorite player, although my dad never had a nice thing to say about the guy who hit before no. 15. Then I followed two players before and after him and so on until I knew the whole team. That was the season I became a baseball fan.
The Dodgers are still my favorite team but the Diamondbacks are a close second. I have to admit I was very mad at the Dodgers last year for trading him but at least my favorite player still comes to Dodger Stadium a lot.
LAT's daughter
and the insight. Beavers!
Yeah. Most episodes allude heavily to previous episodes, so that new viewers miss much of the humor.
Stan from Tacoma
Stan from Tacoma
sArCAsM, Xei
Amazon: http://tinyurl.com/9m8ws
He did local sports on one of the tv channels for quite a while, acquiring the nickname "The General."
I wanted the Dodgers to win when Fernando pitched against them (and they did on 9/19) but I also didn't like Fernando to lose.
Despite the fact that I grew up in the San Gabriel valley (Alhambra, very close to Bob T's stomping grounds), I only became a Dodger fan in grad school, right after college. My best guy friends in grad school were big baseball guys (a Mets fans and a BoSox fan), who in a lot of ways taught me how to watch the game (I was more than anything else a Lakers fan as a kid during the great Showtime era, although I lost interest in sports in High School). Over time, I've become more interested in different aspects of the game, such as front-office management, trades, player evaluation, etc. And some of my academic interests actually have an odd concordance with the current seeming holy war in baseball between statheads and old school dudes.
Nevertheless, baseball for me is foremost both an entertaining distraction (albeit one I probably take too seriously to the point where it can produce far more anguish than entertainment) and a way for me to keep in touch with SoCal, despite the fact that I've basically lived in a sort-of self-imposed exile on the dreadful East Coast for my entire adult life, and will probably be here for several decades more at the very least.
WWSH
BTW, a very good friend of mine once taught at the University of Puget Sound, which he said was referred to as "pungent aroma".
I spent my first semester of college in 1992 at the University of Puget Sound. The phrase we used was "The Tacoma Aroma".
New post up top.
It would be interesting to hear Vin when he first went on the air in 1950. I suspect he was a talented broadcaster from the very beginning of his career.
D4P, hope you had a chance to see some Triple A games at Cheney Stadium while you were in Tacoma.
Stan from Tacoma
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.