Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
I'm still waiting to see if his interest is of the smokescreen variety, but if Ned Colletti completes a deal for free agent catcher Bengie Molina, as the Times suggests is possible, perhaps the most interesting aspect is that Colletti will have definitively shown less interest in building a team from within than Paul DePodesta did.
Break out the hoary 2005 nametag jokes. Already, the longest tenured Dodger starting position player is Jeff Kent.
The idea of young catchers Dioner Navarro and Russell Martin splitting time in Las Vegas seems like a tremendous waste - more likely, Navarro would become trade bait in a package for an outfielder to supplant Jose Cruz, Jr.. But I'd still be surprised and disappointed if Navarro doesn't start for the Dodgers in April. It's not that Molina couldn't represent an improvement for 2006, but it might be a marginal one, and anyway, I thought the idea was to mix the up-and-coming Dodger prospects with veterans. Just because the Dodgers are aiming to contend next year doesn't mean they can't afford to break in one young, promising player.
You may have to hand it to him - perhaps Colletti believes (as I do, not that he would care) that chemistry is a byproduct of winning, and not the other way around. As I've said before, winning trumps all. If Colletti can make it all work, few will care how he did it.
But I'm starting to get shopper's fatigue, like I used to have on childhood trips to Ralphs with my mom that seemed to go on endlessly.
On the one hand I'd love to see a mix of veterans and rookies. I'd like to see that team compete. It would be fun to watch and a joy to root for them.
On the otherhand 1988 was 18 years ago. If the Dodgers could put a World Series run together in 2006 then just be decent for 2-3 years after that I'd seriously consider taking that trade-off.
Molina could be okay on a one year deal, but this really depends on whether the team thinks Navarro is their starting catcher of the future, or a player without as much potential as Russ Martin. It'll be an interesting sideways comment on the farm if they do decide to pick up Molina, that's for sure. I just wouldn't go beyond a one-year deal anywhere.
Fans that did not follow this offseason are in for one big "who the hell is this team?!" on opening day.
Even if the contract IS guaranteed, it's a drop in the bucket and they would surely waive him instead of sending Navarro down, wouldn't they? Who wouldn't rather have Navarro over Alomar?
Didn't see this mentioned before, but Baseball Prospectus has a nice off-season analysis of ol' Ned's chess moves...
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=4712
Does anyone know if Spring Training is covered in Extra innings? I did'nt purchase it last year until opening day.
On Topic::
I dont see why Navarro backing up Molina is that big of a deal. Why would anyone assume it would be Alomar backing up Molina? Why is Navarro as back up for 1 yr scary? Why is 1 yr of rentals certain doom for the Precious(Jackson5)?
I am hoping that this is a smokescreen to drive up his price elsewhere. The only way I'd approve this is if there were plans to ship Navarro and Odalis (or Lowe) and maybe Cruz to Philly for Abreu or something like that.
I want to think that Colletti has a plan.
It seems like this would add another redundancy to the roster. Colletti seems determined to have a team that can withstand injury at any position. And... well.. that's good considering he's added guys like Nomar, Alomar, Lofton.
Who said he's old-school?
27 - It's cool.
I don't like the feel of what Colletti is doing, and there are individual moves that I disagree with completely. But I'm really just trying to avoid "worry" mode.
Something to consider: Navarro was a DePodesta pursuit, Martin drafted by the White-Ng-Evans regime.
Not to date myself, but that was pre ATM days.
Name/HR/BA/OBP/Slug%S/Comments
Molina/14/283/321/422 90% contract rates and excellent line drive ability
Navarro/5/265/336/379 Excellent patience support BA
Bill James
Molina/13/274/315/405
Navarro/7/263/335/371
Hard to see how the increase in slug that Molina will give us is worth the 3-5 million it would take to sign him. At this point they are about the same value with Navarro giving up power but gaining in OBP and the fact he is not glacier slow. Unless Ned is planning on signing Molina for one year while Martin percolates and then trading Navarro in combination with someone else for a significant player I can't see signing on for the deal even though in the beginning I thought one year of Bengie would have some value.
How can you be so sure the 2006 Dodgers won't make a World Series run? Those '88 guys weren't mashers. Would anyone have thought in late '87 early '88 that Hershiser would be Cy Young and Gibson would have been the MVP? Eh, you never know.
My point is the debate for trading prospects is to contend now. The flip is you'd rather play with what you have and hopefully get better.
I've been patiently waiting since '88 for another Dodger World Series. If Colletti pulls that off this year I'm fine with losing Edwin Jackson, Chuck Tiffany, Milton Bradley, Antonio Perez, and possibly even Dioner Navarro.
There is only so much amusement to be had from looking at yourself in a three-way mirror.
At the grocery store (Vons BTW) I would chill at the magazine rack, sit on the floor and read the sporting news.
At the bank, id ask for they keys and go sit in the car. I'd turn everything on, the radio at full blast, the wipers, the lights and when my mom would start the car everything would go ape-stuff.
yes, i have no kids yet and soon what comes around will go around. (my poor wife, lol)
Step 1 - Mueller blows out his knee and Nomar takes over at 3b with Choi filling in at 1st base. Nomar stays healthy and slugs 500 while Choi does his expected 250/375/500 when given at bats.
Step 2 - JD Drew is able to play 120 productive games
Step 3 - Kent does not show any age decline
Step 4 - Penny/Lowe combine to be a solid 1/2.
Step 5 - Seo proves last year was not a fluke and posts another < 3.00 ERA.
Step 6 - Odalis stays healthy, when healthy he contributes at a decent clip.
Step 7 - Tomko shows he really does love pitching in LA and become average instead of pure puuky.
Step 8 - Billingsly gives us what Matt Cain gave the Giants last Sept
Step 9 - Jose Cruz hits like he did in Aug/Sept
Step 10 - Jason Werth recovers his power and gives us a solid platoon in CF with Lofton
Step 10A - Gagne/Baez/Yhancy/Broxton/Kuo close doors like the 2003 team.
A simple 10 step process that will find the Dodgers good enough to knock off the Mets/Cardinals/Phillies/Braves.
I think I might ask what he thinks about Hee Sop Choi and how he feels about awkward arm angles.
http://6-4-2.blogspot.com/2006/01/wtny-2006-top-10.html
The wifey and I are half-heartedly considering a move to the Westside, maybe Beverlywood or Culver City. I actually had to make the commute during rush hour today (normally I get in around 10:30 - 11:00 or so), which wasn't as awful as I expected, but still pretty much solid stop-and-stop from La Tijera to the 10, and that was without any "incidents".
47 - A long-ago friend of mine who used to work at Disneyland in one of the not-quite-but-almost lowliest-of-the-lowly jobs there (bathroom maintanence) told me once that there were two kinds of employees in the Magic Kingdom: those who really believed and lived all the Disney propaganda -- and those who were actually subversives. She was the latter kind, and as a result, a ton of fun to be around.
That, I always thought, was the kind of guy that Goofus was. Or maybe Gallant on his days off.
http://6-4-2.blogspot.com/2006/01/pickoff-moves-waiting-for-goddamn.html
Regarding Molina: I never realized just how slow he really is until a couple of years ago. He grounded to third to start what would turn into a triple play. And when the ball reached first, two outs later, they still got Bengie by three steps.
It was meant to be a sympathetic comment in that the weather up there is way colder then SoCal and the people are a little different plus where would you find a good mexican restaurant in Toronto? Not that Molina likes mexican food but if I'm ever in Toronto are there any recommendations?
Not that Bengie is Mexican. I'd rather be sent to Toronta and play in the Dome then be sent to Washington/Florida and suffer the gnats and humidity.
True, but Jon normally points out very nicely whenever someone forgets.
"Multiculturalism it's what sets Toronto apart from other big North American cities. Toronto is home to virtually all of the world's culture groups and is the city where more than 100 languages are spoken."
I'd love to see Dioner get a full year as starting catcher, if the alternative choice is to use up salary that is better devoted elsewhere due to a specified salary limit. But if there is no limit, why wouldn't you want a guy who has posted above-average offensive numbers for a catcher, AND has two gold gloves under his belt already, especially given the problems Navarra has had throwing out runners? How is he NOT an improvement over Navarro if $ was not a serious issue here?
My point is maybe this is a sign that Frankie is freeing up more dough, sick of losing, finally turning some of that 3 mill attendance $ back our way, and if so, who wouldn't want to add a gold glove catcher, one of the best shortstops in the game, and a former perennial allstar who was halted by injuries but is now healthy? Sure, we can't offer 60 million dollar guaranteed contracts left and right like the Yanks or Red Sox, but it's an improvement.
Related topic to this...did anyone out there have the MLB All Access package in years past? And if so, did you like the Condensed Games feature?
I specifically got it for that last season (I'm an East Coaster who has to get up at 5:00 am Eastern, so staying up until 2:00 am every night isn't possible), and was quite underwhelmed with it. They rarely showed the complete game, missed half innings many times, skipped base hits, etc.
Just wondered what anyone else thought as I'm debating on getting it again this season.
With Furcal, what are we going to do with Izzie? Trade him.
If you trade Navarro, Molina is a place sitter until Martin comes up from Vegas.
Gagne is salary is going to go through the roof. Baez is a 1/3 the price.
share your thoughts...
Navarro has no problem throwing out runners. He had a 31% rate in the minors. The Dodger pitchers have a problem holding on runners. Even Pudge could not overcome the lax attitude of D Lowe and company when it comes to baserunners.
My problem with the trade is that at this point Navarro is already just as good as Bengie without the injury history.
Gagne has way better Hygeine than Manny.
But I agree, I'd trade Gagne for a big bat.
75 - Yeah, something was/is up. It'll get fixed.
I think those who are against an acquisition like Molina (or Lofton, Garciaparra, Furcal for that matter) are operating under the assumption that the Dodgers are working within the confines of a medium sized 80-85 mill budget cap. If true, those arguments are certainly valid arguments. However, if say the Dodgers are now a 100 mill budget (or even 110+), then those arguments start to make less and less sense.
Exactly, there are ALOT OF PEOPLE around here that complain about salaries, EVEN IF ITS A 1 YEAR CONTRACT, alot of penny pinchers around here that are consumed by the moneyball aspect of payroll (sorry to be blunt about this).
What does it matter IF ITS ONLY A 1 YEAR CONTRACT, since mccourt has said he will spend to win.
But with that said, i don't want molina because navarro deserves a shot to start and we need to filter in some youngsters instead of them all arriving at the same time.
It's somewhat like L.A. except with good public transportation and less garbage on the streets.
Still, 1000+ is a stretch for anywhere that's not a continent.
http://tinyurl.com/dw9lw
99- I doubt anywhere would give LA a run for its money.Sushi in Nashville?
And should your tastes even count when you consider a baseball hat acceptable attire for a romantic evening out?
You sure about that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Ethiopia,_Los_Angeles,_California
103. As for not believing my numbers why don't you google the average monthly temperatures of Toronto and Anaheim to check for yourself? And as for painting yourself blue and banging on trashcans, do you trust those people to make restaurant recommendations for you?
Most seem to be looking at this as a Molina or Navarro equation, but wouldn't it really be Molina AND Navarro? Can anyone seriously imagine the Dodgers sending Navarro down so Alomar can play?
If this is a prelude to another trade, that's a different matter. But it's plausible that they're looking at Bengie because they think they can contend and are having second thoughts about Alomar.
Nyala
1076 South Fairfax Ave.
Los Angeles, CA. 90019
Tel 3239365918
fax 3239361261
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.