Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
And I say that with all of George Michael Bluth's melancholy sincerity ...
More people than myself are beginning to take a look at the state of the National League West for 2006. Bruce Jenkins of the San Francisco Chronicle has his own rundown today.
Jenkins' hunch is similar to mine, which is that if Barry Bonds has one final season of greatness or goodness left in him, and if young Matt Cain can help amp up the starting rotation, the Giants look like favorites. If not, the Dodgers look poised to return to the top of the molehill - although I take issue with, among other things he wrote, Jenkins' broad use of the word "gamers" to describe only Ned Colletti's acquisitions. Somehow Nomar Garciaparra and Kenny Lofton are gamers, but Jeff Kent is one of the Dodgers' "issues."
As a third option, though they have made a mixed bag of offseason moves, you can't rule out the Padres because they won the 2005 NL West despite being hampered by injuries. They could have their own year of good news from the doctors, and the Giants and Dodgers might not stay healthy. Basically, the division is a battle of first-aid kits.
As for the other two teams in the division, you don't have to rule out the Diamondbacks because they do have some young (albeit maybe too young) talent to go with their old (albeit maybe too old) talent. And you don't have to rule out the Rockies because ... what fun is that?
But overall, I like the Dodgers chances to fend off Bonds and others to win the NL West, booby prize that it may be. But feel free to reshape my thinking. What do you think?
As far as I'm concerned this a win for the Dodgers as well. Unlike most on this site, I can't stand the Angels. I will root against them everytime.
In order for the Dodgers to succeed they are banking on good years from players in their thirties with injury historys.
In order for the Giants to succeed they are banking on good years from player in their forties with inury histories.
Common sense would pick the Dodgers however what is common is does not always make sense.
This year, their improvements are marginal--I don't see any upgrading of their starting rotation, one of the main problems of last year. But if the injury situation improves (a reasonable assumption), given the lack of movement by the Giants and Padres, I don't see why they can't win the division.
Like you said, it's a booby prize.
The Rockies are the Rockies
The Diamondbacks number two starter is Brad Halsey
The Padres have no offensive threats outside of Giles and their pitching starts looking thin outside of Peavy.
The Giants get even older and had several fluke performances last year. Winn will go back to being average, Matheny will go back to being worthless offensively, and Moises Alou should decline, but he is a machine. Then again, their pitching should be much better.
Like last year, the Dodgers are the only team in the division that are serviceable in all areas. That should be enough.
3 - Based on a testy discussion from a week or so ago, I'm establishing an informal ban on discussing whether most people on this site like or dislike the Angels. Plenty of people feel both ways about them; let's leave it at that.
if the pirates do better than us, for whatever godforsaken reason, how bad will the la press beat down little?
Dili, East Timor: Barry -
Do we have any shot at Jeff Weaver?
And, if not, is it the money or the various extra-curricular problems that other free agents have cited?
Thanks!
Barry Svrluga: No shot for the Nationals and Jeff Weaver. Too expensive. Washington never showed much interest. I think the extra-curricular problems you mention (stadium, ownership, etc.) had more of an impact on some other free agents such as Brett Tomko.
(link: Washingtonpost.com and look for the "baseball" chat transcript)
1) Dodgers
2) D'Backs
3) Gnats
4) Rockies
5) Pads
I just had to be different by having the Rockies move up. Honestly, I think the D-Backs lack of experience, but abundance of talent will have them on our heels. The Gnats will hang in for a while until their DL gets bloated. I think the Pads are just too weak offensively and I would like to see the Rockies over-achieve some.
Bullpens are not even in the same tax bracket.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/09/14/SPG2JEN50G1.DTL
I've no use for him.
You're credit for bounceback years to Lowe, Penny and Perez, but not to Morris or Schmidt. It could go that way, but it could also go the other way.
Lowry, Cain and Brad Hennessey seem to be at least as talented as Perez, Seo and Tomko. Billingsley doesn't figure to be in the picture, and Houlton probably won't beat out Tomko.
No, the SF rotation might not be clearly superior, but I don't see how it's inferior.
I agree with you about the bullpens.
This is the age of analysis overload in baseball, and some of it borders on the ridiculous. We started keeping track a few months ago -- keep in mind, these come from responsible, respected people around the game -- and here are some of the lowlights:
Well, if they come from "responsible, respected people around the game..." then they deserve respectful attention.
".... This is the new cool trend in baseball, quoting esoteric statistics as if they've been part of the game's fabric for 50 years."
Well, the data has always been there, it's just that some creative people (i.e. respected people around the game) have learned how to mine it for the sake of improving overall baseball skills and performance analysis! Gee, what a concept!
As if there is something wrong with this???
Do some so-called sports "journalist" feel an irresistable need to take the Plaschke course on "Effective Yet Innane Use of Hyperbole"?
(The résumé speaks for itself. In 16 years as a minor-league manager, Little learned to deal with homesick kids in Rookie League and disgruntled veterans in Triple-A ball. He worked in a demanding media market in Boston, spent 10 years in a winning environment in the Atlanta system, and embraced the concept of flexibility at every step along the way. The Dodgers expect to promote pitcher Chad Billingsley, catcher Russell Martin, third baseman Andy LaRoche and several other elite prospects in the next year or two, and they wanted a manager who's not married to the veterans.
"Sometimes a manager is reluctant to play a kid," Colletti said. "I needed Grady to be open minded that if a young player is ready, we'll give him an opportunity. Grady assured us that he has no reservations about that. He's completely on board with it." )
On the otherhand, I imagine that these "Old School" reporters do not understand all the "new-fangled" stats and analyses themselves, and, out of fear of seeming uninformed, prefer to take defensive measures by slamming the alternate techniques instead of taking the time and attempting to understand them. They may not agree with them, but to dismiss them out-of-hand so prejudiciously shows an immaturity and professional shortcoming that borders on malfeasance.
28-I agree with you there. I do not however agree with the author about the Giants starting rotation as the start all end all rotation of the west. I think that Lowe having a good year is dependent on his being able to not blister and whether or not carolyn hughes had any career altering STD's.
Schmidt will be caught for HGH which he took on accident thinking it was hair growth hormone and not human growth hormone.
The deciding factor in which rotation is better is going to be Perez and Morris, if Perez is 03 or even 04 I would say the Dodgers are better even if Morris stays the same.
Penny will do good, I have no reasons other then I was at the game he got his suspension for swinging at an ump and I feel that is reason alone for him to have a killer year this season.
The others will cancel eachother out in brilliance and mediocrity.
name team pRAR
Webb,Brandon ARI 15.9
Hernandez,Orlando ARI -3.1
Batista,Miguel ARI -3.4
Vargas,Claudio ARI -10.9
Ortiz,Russ ARI -26.1
ARI Total -27.6
Kim,Sun Woo COL -4.3
Kim,Byung-Hyun COL -4.4
Day,Zach COL -8.5
Cook,Aaron COL -11.5
Jennings,Jason COL -13.6
Francis,Jeff COL -20.9
COL Total -63.2
Perez,Odalis LA 7
Penny,Brad LA 5.3
Lowe,Derek LA 5
Tomko,Brett LA -1.9
Seo,Jae LA -3.1
LA Total 12.3
Peavy,Jake SD 27.6
Young,Chris SD 12
Estes,Shawn SD -5.7
Williams,Woody SD -6.6
Park,Chan Ho SD -14.5
SD Total 12.8
Cain,Matt SF 24.9
Schmidt,Jason SF 19.8
Lowry,Noah SF 4
Morris,Matt SF 3.6
Hennessey,Brad SF -7.2
SF Total 45.1
In real life and in projected stats the Giants big 3 kick our rotation butt. Matt Cain will be what Billingsly will be next year and that is the 2nd best pitcher in the division.
"since the 1995 work stoppage"
Huh? Am I on crack or didn't the strike occur in 1994, not 1995?
I use the projected stats from Baseball HQ because they are the best at projecting future performance.
Sooner or later, the MSM will stop putting up with this and pounce on those, such as Jon, who are proven exceptions to the rule.
I'll keep my eyes open for them, and post them here when I see them.
That brings up another question, Do you think any players will be DQ'd from the WBC for steroids?
It's like getting a parking ticket in Canada. You don't need to pay it unless you go back to Canada.
I use them both but the actual analysis that BP did to make that claim was not very impressive. Pecota for 2006 has not been published yet. When it is I expect the combined VORP of the SF versus LA rotation to still be substantial.
"Some players, like Shawn Green of the Dodgers, can figure out a pitcher's pitches with uncanny accuracy."
Really? Did he stop doing it after 2002? If this were true we wouldn't have seen him swing at so many breaking balls in the dirt.
Remember this is Baseball HQ's version of RAR.
Runs Above Replacement (RAR)
Purpose & Meaning
An estimate of the number of runs a player contributes above a "replacement level" player. "Replacement" is defined as the level of performance at which a player can easily be found at little or no cost to a team. What constitutes replacement level is a topic that is hotly debated. There are a variety of formulas and rules of thumb used to determine this level for each position (replacement level for a shortstop will be very different from replacement level for an outfielder).
BATTERS
1. Start with a batter's runs created per game (RC/G).
2. Subtract his position's replacement level RC/G.
Replacement levels used on this site:
POS AL NL
C 4.33 3.81
1B 4.99 5.95
2B 4.08 4.61
3B 4.91 5.06
SS 4.46 4.13
LF 4.94 5.44
CF 4.71 4.65
RF 4.70 5.29
DH 5.30
3. Multiply by number of games played, calculated as (plate appearances / 35).
PITCHERS
1. Start with the replacement level league ERA.
2. Subtract the pitcher's ERA. (To calculate projected RAR, use the pitcher's XERA.)
3. Multiply by number of games played, calculated as plate appearances (IP x 4.34) divided by 35.
4. Multiply the resulting RAR level by 1.08 to account for the variance between earned runs and total runs.
Now if the Dodgers are going to renew my tickets automatically, they are going to find one angry customer.
Out with the in with the 3 months older...
Now for some reason I wish that Boston would've lost like they were supposed to in 04.
Someone committed suicide, but I didn't hear how. I doubt the guy had a sword. My money is on a gun or a noose.
kearns to be traded.
blah, who thinks jackson and tiff could have gotten us kearns?
69 - I hear subway and/or bullet train is fairly popular too...
http://tinyurl.com/99yua
70. Article also says Piazza to the Pods maybe. Boo
http://www.fhmus.com/articles-702.asp
Ran across this from a friend I guess that Kris benson was the Mets Ace. That is honestly news to me.
H.S. Securities head Hideaki Noguchi, 38, was found dead on Wednesday in a room at a hotel on the southern island of Okinawa from what police said appeared to be self-inflicted knife wounds.
Does Barry have one more season? Who knows. We already know he is, at best, an average fielder. In addition, he will be limited on the base paths by both a lack of speed and an inability/unwillingness to slide. He can't play more than 120 games. The only question is will he be able to hit like he used to. I'm betting this is the year he wakes up a pasty-white 60 year old singer who slept with Sonny Bono and Greg Allman.
And good news for all the other Betty White fans here (LAT, I think that's just you and Steve), looks like she is back on for good!
Betty White rocks.
Pat Borders and Joe Beimel coming to spring training for the Dodgers!
So did Jon...
Weird about Chris Penn.
I guess we're yet again going with the vet over the youngster, poor Eric Langill, his dreams of being a AAA back up catcher for an entire season were squashed by Borders. If Langill also has a dream to back up Russell Martin and Pete Laforest in the WBC, that was also squashed. I guess that's the life of a roster filling catcher that makes Mike Piazza look like a gold glover, and could be out hit by the 43 yr old Pat Borders
dodgersims.blogspot.com
vr, Xei
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.