Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Though NBC4.tv and City News Service report that a proposed shuttle to Dodger Stadium from the Metro Gold, Blue and Red lines has been deemed too expensive to operate by Los Angeles' Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the estimated deficit is less than Ramon Martinez's salary: from $500,000 to $670,000 per year (based upon a $4 individual round-trip fee).
According to the report, the MTA has not ascertained the Dodgers' interest in the shuttle. But if the team and its fans did find such a service worthwhile, it would seem possible that the dollar gap could be bridged. County Supervisor Mike Antonovich apparently suggested as much, requesting the MTA to "look into partnerships with private companies to subsidize some of the cost," the report said.
As many of you know, a bus shuttle service for Friday night games from Union Station to Dodger Stadium came and went in recent years. Though many people don't have convenient access to the subway in Los Angeles, those that do might certainly enjoy taking advantage of a regular shuttle service, given the proximity of the stadium to three different subway lines.
The key would be to ensure that enough shuttles would be running so that people wouldn't grow impatient with the service. The staffing issues surrounding this concern could put the operations cost out of reach. And given that Dodger attendance is as high as it is, there might not be much incentive for the team to contribute to this cause. In a sense, though the hypothetical deficit seems somewhat small, it's possible that in reality it would be much larger.
I guess I'm left wondering why is it so expensive for the MTA to increase its service. When push comes to shove, isn't this simply just another route? Is there something about this route that gives it a particularly exorbitant cost? Maybe someone with more expertise can enlighten.
Update: Comments below indicate there are several reasons why this specialized service is more difficult to finance. Basically, because of the inconsistent scheduling and ridership, it's not just another route.
* * *
In other news, Forbes magazine reports (via The Associated Press) that the Dodgers have the fourth-highest value of any Major League Baseball franchise, at $482 million. The Yankees were first at $1 billion, though they reported an operating loss last year.
Update: Dodger Thoughts reader Steve - he's like Cher at this point, no last name required - provides this link to Forbes' chart and nudges us to look at the Debt/Value column.
While we're at it, here's how the MLB teams rank by one-year value change. Washington and Kansas City - you're in the top three!
* * *
Rafael Furcal, who hasn't exactly been too healthy himself, has deprived the Cubs of Derrek Lee for six weeks to three months by colliding with the All-Star first baseman. Lee has two broken bones in his right wrist.
* * *
Las Vegas at Fresno, 7 p.m.
http://www.forbes.com/lists/2006/33/Rank_1.html
They certainly found the money to build their version of the Taj Mahal for a transit center though.
As for the shuttle, I think the costs are:
1) procuring buses (I don't believe they used full-sized ones)
2) paying drivers ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
3) paying for the fuel ($$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$)
Since the service wouldn't be run regularly, but just about 80-85 times a year, you would need to be able to tweak the schedule by hiring more drivers to cover the time needed.
I don't know who pays for the Hollywood Bowl Park N' Ride (I assume the County and the LA Phil chip in to pay the MTA), but that's the model that the Dodger Stadium shuttle would follow.
Would a shuttle using the Gold and Red Lines as they are presently constituted ever get more than 1000-2000 riders per game?
I'm not a transportation expert and I make no guarantees and only wish to engage in speculation.
On duty: 15 hours in a day, max.
Driving: 10 hours per day, max.
60 total working hours per week, max.
But, trust me, these regulations are a joke. Totally unenforceable.
http://www.lacity.org/ita/urldoc2630.pdf
---
The City of LA Dept. of Transportation operates the DASH service for 25 cents at a huge overall loss. Extending the DASH to offer trips to and from Union Station and Dodger Stadium wouldn't stray from the spirit of the DASH program. It's alleviating congestion around downtown and encouraging public transit.
It's a public service and it shouldn't have to be profitable.
http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/sb20060421j1.html
3R HR yesterday... (or is that today, or tomorrow? I can never get Japanese time down.)
----
As for transportation to and fro Dodger Stadium, it sure would be swell to have an option other than car, even in (gasp!) LA. People would feel less stressed about leaving early, about traffic, etc. A tram system, something, anything would help.
hey, nate, what do you think TB will do with Upton?
Oh great, he is on my team too uggghhhh.
ruin him.
And it shouldn't have to be the Dodgers taking the lead on a shuttle project.
I don't think the Dodgers will hire people that good.
But I think McCourt wouldn't mind hooking up with Caruso to create "Chavez Grove".
When they do build the DS structure instead of being parked in the Mickey or Daisy section you can park in the Koufax or Drysdale section. That would be cool the first time or two. If they have a breakdown lane it can be called Dreifort Way.
I agree Frank would like to develop the property but I have a hard time seeing a high-end, Grove type project in Chavez. But then I have very little vision. Just ask my wife. When she asks "do you like this dress?" I say "I don't know. I have to see it on." Then I say I like the dress. I'm not stupid you know.
Of course the the far right lane, i.e. the slow lane or passing lane is call the Jason Phillips Expressway
Lerner group has added Rod Slater(former Sec. of Trans), and a DC-based African American banker named Mitchell. That group is also now confirmed to include James Brown (CBS) and Paxton Baker (BET). Presumably, this resolves the mlb concern on this issue leaked last week.
Selig and DuPuy have scheduled further meetings next with Lerner group and Malek group. Presumably, the Malek meeting will not be over dinner.
(from article at washingtonpost.com)
Not at all clear to me why you'd need more meetings at this point. Could be (1) want to let the losers down in person, (2) want to force one of these groups to take on Jeff Smulyan, Reinsdorf's buddy, or (3) want to force the two leading groups to merge.
To be continued . . .
Would be funny if Chicago ended up making a minor deal to get Choi from Boston to fill in at 1st while Lee is on the DL. Two years in a row a collision at 1st base knocks out an oppossing teams big stud. I'd suggest the opposition start getting out of the way of our hard charging base runners.
As you all can see I'm very bored tonight without a game.
Just wanted to give LAT a little more to fill his time.
All this by way of saying: anybody else find it a little, um, funny, how quickly Sam DC came up with Suri with the fringe on top, yesterday?
http://tinyurl.com/fndrk
Bob (or anyone) have a list of leadoff hitters who had 100 RBI seasons? I know Soriano did it, but a few of the RBIs might have come from batting in a different spot in the order (or as a pinch hitter).
As long as he doesn't use up any of his 9 HRs.
BTW: how many doubles is he supposed to hit this year to accompany his 9 dingers and 100 ribbies?
He's 3 for 4 today with 2 HR 6 RBI. That's 13 RBI on the season. He'd probably be our #4 hitter. Ned really put together a pathetic lineup.
I'm sure most of us have evaluated the lineup according to our own criteria, but has anyone tried to evaluate the lineup based on Flanders' stated criteria (e.g. speed and athleticism)? Is this a "speedy" and "athletic" team?
1999 perhaps?
It is way to early to judge our line up. Let's see what happens when Nomar gets back in.
On this day last year, the dodgers beat the pads 3-1 to improve to 12-2. Then went 59-89 the rest of the way. So lets wait.
BTW, how is Nomar batting tonight?
This really made me laugh:
http://firejoemorgan.blogspot.com/2006/04/joechat.html
Especially the part about "Moneyball." Fresh material, I promise.
I don't know about "speedy" and "athletic", but the lineup was definitely scrappy last night, especially with #17 in LF. Don't forget that old man Kent supplies the leadership.
I also wanted Fernando Rodney last year. I also thought that Bill Hall would develop into a nice player. I've been wrong about some players though, like Carlos Pena.
I'm really going to hate Nomar's short at bats.
2-3 2b,1b,groundout.
first pitch swinging in all the ABs.
The team will also have enough energy to last the whole game due to the ample supply of KeLories.
And here I thought I was the only one...
Did the team itself even steal 4 bases in April last year?
I form my own opinions because I played the game and have 40 years of experience in the game. There isn't much that others can teach me about the game.
I would like to bust the "that's just powerful stupid" Bill Maher line, but I think that Joe's response is more a combination of arrogance and ignorance.
Furcal bunted down the 1st base line. The pitcher went for the bunt, flopped on the ground to snag it, and then flipped the ball wildly in the direction of 1b. Lee tried to catch the ball by crossing over the bag towards foul territory. Like a car trying to beat the train at the crossing, he got hit by Furcal who was running full speed down the baseline. From my vantage point it looked like Furcal's helmet struck Lee's wrist. It was unfortunate, but the pitcher made a bad play, and Lee made a poor decision trying to catch the throw in a dangerous spot.
As for Dodgers, they were victims of squib hits, seeing eye popups and bad luck.
Kent looked very uncomfortable all night at the plate, but made a couple of nice plays on DP's. Then, in his final at bat he smoked a liner in the 5-6 hole but the SS, Cedeno made a great play to catch it and end the game.
Baez was throwing OK. Plenty of velocity. IMHO he'll prove to be an asset in the long run. Penny was dominating and pitched smart.
The worst decision by a manager during the game IMHO was Baker's letting Marshall bat with the bases loaded and two outs in the fourth. Marshall struck out on 4 pitches. No contest. Dusty got lucky as far as the final score is concerned, but the loss of Lee is going to really hurt the Cubs lineup.
Without Drew in the lineup, the Dodgers were pretty toothless. I really hope the extra day off this week gives Kent the opportunity to shake off the remaining cob webs.
Lofton looked very good in CF. Very fast and ran great routes to fly balls. If he stays healthy he'll either help us win games, or be a terrific chip to bargain with in July.
MB
You didn't by chance get nailed with Cedeno's throw did you:)
That throw reminded of Steve Garvey's days at 3b.
MB
AZ started out the season pitching so well. Their good pitching must have been like the Dodgers good hitting.
Illusory.
Per Petula Clark's advice, I don't sleep in the subway.
(Although she was referring to a different meaning of subway.)
brandon webb?
And Ethier looks really impressive huh? A lot better than everyone's "4th outfielder" projections for sure right now.
line for the season.
8IP .75whip 12K
he's playing really well. I always liked ethier and was glad that he, and not kirk saarloos was the player we were getting in return for bradley. If ethier can play CF, his value would be tremendously higher.
Who do you think is a better defensive CF, Kemp or Ethier?
I honestly have no clue because I have never seen either play on a consistent basis and there are not any good defensive metrics for the minors.
I think speed wise, they are the same with kemp probably getting the nod due to his athletic background. Kemp has the stronger arm. I dont know how they compare route wise and reading the ball off the bat.
Thats a good question, something probably Callis or Manuel from BA could answer better if you ask them in a chat or something.
That's why I think Kemp is our future CF, and Ethier in left. The person I'm not sure about is Guzman. Entering today's game, he has struck out 15 times, and walked only 1 time ( I know Kemp's K/BB ratio isn't that good, but at least his OBP is decent at .359), with a .328 OBP. I'm really not sure where he is going to play on the field.
122 - Nomar was scheduled for six innings tonight, nine innings Friday.
That's going to be the Marlins problem. :)
Good.
You think we're gonna trade him?
http://tinyurl.com/h2jj9
If we were to trade him, I think an AL team would like him better because he can DH, so we might be able to get better value from him there.
These aren't exact (I just took the AL and NL numbers and averaged them) but I pulled them off BP initially. They changed their format so I can't find them anymore.
LF - .275/.341/.446
CF - .271/.330/.421
RF - .270/.339/.454
Guzman's athleticism and his ability to play multiple positions makes him have good value to NL teams as well.
re 141
thanks. those numbers seem about right. A 275/.341/.446 LFers line is very doable for Ethier IMO. Which wouldnt make him a 4th outfielder, but an average starting LF.
as of now, Ethier's ISOp is a solid 236.
last year, the two highly touted dback prospects- conor jackson and carlos quentin put up ISOp's of 199 and 219.
Good job by that editor in putting the wrong name of El Camino Real High in the headline.
except his OBP will probably be 50 points higher.
Right now, I'm looking at the .178 ISOp from 2005 in a hitters league. I don't know what league Arizona's AA team is in, so I don't know how it compares. Plus, I'm sure Vegas is inflating Ethier's stats even further.
If he can prove the patience he displayed in the AFL wasn't a fluke, I'll hop on the Ethier bandwagon. Give me until the end of June to make a decision.
But this, as did the Marte for Renteria trade, will ruin my plan for "NL East 3Bmen" to become the old "AL East SSs" and have the four best in the league (five if not for Dallas Green) play against each other in EVERY inter-divisional game!
Wow, an NL East circa 2008 with Marte, Miggy C, Wright, Zimmerman, and Rolen would have been truly incredible. There are whole decades that don't see that much talent at one position!
151 - And it took until this post for someone to mention Rex Hudler on this particular date. That is what separates DT from every other baseball blog!
when arizona had their AA team in the texas league, jackson's and quentin's ISOp were 155 and 176.
according to that, Midland (ethier's home AA park), was very much a pitcher's park as well. The HR factor was .80
I cant find El Paso's park factors (dbacks old AA club). Maybe im blind, but it doesnt seem to be there.
All 3, Jackson, Quentin and Ethier were all drafted in the 2003 draft (jackson and quentin first round, ethier first round supp). The difference in their development is that Jackson And Quentin advanced to AA in the middle of their 2004 season whereas Ethier played the whole year in high A.
I think Edwin Encarnacion of the Reds will be a top 3 3rd basemen by 2008. Behind David Wright, Miguel Cabrera but ahead of Zimmerman, Rolen, and Marte. He destroyed the Int'll league, then came up to the Reds last year and had good ISO numbers. This year I think he's putting it all together.
Maybe Loney will follow that path, although I doubt it.
for how small he is, he packs a punch with the bat.
I think it's possible that McCourt will sell the team in 3 years. Here's why:
- The high level of debt. In the 80s, LBO funds would take over diversified firms with steady cash flows, run up a ton of debt on them for the tax shield, then sell off the components for a profit. McCourt has taken on additional debt, I'm assuming, to finance the stadium renovations that have taken place each of the last two offseasons. This is in addition to the debt he has taken on just to buy the team. He is able to write off the interest expense from his income (the Dodgers are currently organized as an LLC, which is a change from when Fox ran them as a corporation). The fact that he has undertaken so many renovations in such a short time with such a high debt level may indicate an intent to sell in the near future.
- McCourt hasn't taken a long-term strategy to operating the team. This may be due solely to managerial incompetence, but very few of the decisions the team has taken seem to have a distant horizon in mind. For example, he fired Depodesta because he really didn't care where the team would be in 5 years since he was always planning on selling by then. He hired Colletti because he hoped goodwill from the media and fans would translate into greater Dodger brand value and better operational cash flows until he sold. Hiring and firing various front-office managers, repeatedly, may be a symptom that he just isn't in it for the long haul and is seeking quick change for the reasons I've discussed above and below.
- Some kind of 5-year depreciation rule. This is a weak point in my argument because I can't remember the specifics, but I recall reading something about a 5-year window and accelerated depreciation schedules. I believe Fox owned the team for 5 years (I could be wrong about that). One of the reasons they sold when they did is that the 5-year window for an unnamed depreciation advantage closed and owning the team was less attractive (plus they had already accomplished their strategic goal of launching a local cable network and keeping Disney out of that market). McCourt may be able to depreciate his new Dodger assets at some kind of advantage as a new owner. The depreciation totals can be used as a tax writeoff much like the interest expense discussed above. This would be particularly valuable to McCourt since he sold millions of dollars of Boston real estate this year and large interest and dpereciation expenses would save him a ton of money on taxes resulting from the sale; it would be difficult to run up expenses suitably large unless he took on an asset such as a baseball team.
Again, I'm just speculating. I invite and CPAs or finance professionals to comment and critique my assumptions of accounting regulations and practices, because I'm not 100% sure of how all of this stuff works. Still, I think there are some dominos in place that, to me, explain things about the McCourt ownership that are very odd outside of any other perspective other than a short-term sale especially when looked at in conjunction with the timing of his sale of Boston real estate assets.
public transportation to dodger stadium can be something my future kids can dream about, i suppose.
BTW Who's in Washington.
No. Hu's on SS.
I think the priorities should be a line to Santa Monica and the Gold Line extension east to Montclair.
We're supposed to go to Nationals/Braves tonight but it's expected to pour. I'm sure I'll have an easy rescheduling 7 seats for a rainout game . . .
got all that power from a not so big frame.
This is not all that rare. Still I think its a good thing that in the last two years he's gone from 5'11"/185 to 6'1"/215.
While he was only 19 or 20, making this just barely possible, how much is probably statistical inflation? Is this normal?
Jon, I'm surprised you've never used the LA subway/lightrail system. Kids love it, especially the ride on the blue line to the aquarium. Once they get the line running to USC/Kids Science Center/Natural History Museum they will make school field trips so much easier. My wife's 4th grade class takes the Amtrak from Chatsworth to Union Station every year and they talk about it all year.
I think structuring this public trans commute in LA is one of more substantial achievements.
Steve -- It was what it was, about 2 hours end to end, more predictable and I could get a lot more schoolwork done than if driving. An interesting slice of LA folks to immerse in. Couldn't cope with it now with kids, etc. Train commuter culture is interesting everywhere. Lots of unwritten rules to figure out.
I really am bummed to have good seats tonight with fun group of family to see Patterson/Smoltz and 90% chance of rain.
With $3 gas, I notice an increase in Gold Line ridership.
http://tinyurl.com/pz57b
http://tinyurl.com/h5qc6
Essentially, McCourt is playing the same game with the Dodgers as real estate speculators do. Its the basic premise of a "get rich quick" scheme.
#1. Borrow money. Use borrowed money to buy asset. Sell asset for profit, thereby recouping interest expense + a nice profit margin.
Its really no different than buying real estate.
Say you buy a house with a $100,000 mortgage. You sell it within two years at $150,000. 50,000 profit, and you never spent a dime of your own money (other than whatever mortage payments you made while you're fixing it up for those two years, say 10,000)
However, its not that easy turning over a baseball team as it is real estate. Real Estate is a fairly liquid asset, especially with a large housing bubble currently. A professional baseball team is not a liquid asset. How many people want to own, or have the money to buy a professional team? Not many.
The McCourts, with their highly leveraged financing, small current revenue streams (which finance the interest expense), and illiquid assets they own really cant be in great shape.
Lots of Debt + non-liquid asset + small revenue streams= poor financial state
I don't know the particulars any more than anyone else, but I suspect they are doing just fine.
Plus, buying a baseball team is a relatively fun way to get a huge tax shield.
Years ago in Hollywood, there were tax accounting rules that allowed wealthy professionals to take tax savings greater than the amount they had invested in securitized film projects. Those loopholes were changed, but the principle is somewhat similar.
If Nomar passes tonights test he should be starting Saturday night.
I expect everyone here would be very happy to change places with Mr McCourt and his leveraged finances. I guess Dodger fans would be happier with the owner of the Twins who is one of the richest owners in baseball and does nothing to help his team instead of an owner who had to risk everything to realize his dream of owning a baseball team and continues to make capital improvements while keeping the payroll at the highest level for his division. He's made plenty of mistakes but unless your kidding yourselves everyone makes mistakes in the beginning of any enterprise that they are unfamiliar with. I'm glad McCourt owns the team because I'd rather have a leveraged owner who is passionate about baseball then a well heeled fat cat where the team is just another write off on his massive ledger sheet. Sure he will have to do some things that might offend fans because he will need to increase the revenue stream but don't think that O'Malley wouldn't have had to do the same thing if he still owned the team.
http://tinyurl.com/mmxh5
on the other hand, I wouldn't want to be a member of a club that would want me as a member
I doubt I will get far except with xeifrank.
Not asserting that Pohlad is a great owner or a great man, but you really want to compare him to McCourt?
Pohlad may not like to spend money, but he does get out of the way of his baseball people and lets them run things. He's not changing the entire executive suite at the first sign of trouble.
Twins won the AL Central from 2001-04.
"One time in Vero Beach when he was hurt, he said to me, 'Acey, I was a good hitter. Maybe you could try me as a hitter,'" said Acey Kohrogi, the Dodgers' director of Asian operations. "I said, 'Shut up, Kuo. You have a golden left arm. Just stay with it.'
You gave the Twins one too many championships there. They finished 6 games behind Cleveland in 2001 in second place. That was a 16-game improvement over 2000.
When I heard it said, I could not repeat the sound. It's not an English phoneme.
http://tinyurl.com/nzp6q
An interesting quote by Colletti where he refers to "Sammy" as
" A savvy Veteran "
For anyone interested in Transformers
http://tinyurl.com/zex2x
The Movie has been Cast.
ToyCannon, if you value our electronic friendship, please never mention Stanhouse again :)
You mean that doesn't bring back fond memories of our 1st foray into the big buck free agent world that was almost always disapointing until Kirk Gibson changed everything.
It did get us the most exciting 3 game series in LA Dodger history. If Stanhouse and Goltz hadn't been signed we would have won in a cakewalk and been deprived of the thrilling series.
http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/draft/news/261092.html
Clayton Kershaw is a name to remember.
I personally dont really like a lot of the college arms this year, they all have too many questions on them.
Yet Drabek and Kiker may not go as high as their talent alone would warrant. Scouts have expressed worries about their makeup, both on and off the diamond.
"(Drabek) will still go in the first round . . . but you better do your homework on him. Kasey Kiker, too," a second AL scouting director said. "On the mound, they're both top 10 picks. But with all the other stuff, it's hard to pick those guys."
I wonder what "all the other stuff" means.
Yeah, I noticed that. I frankly could care less, because if it was something really bad we would have heard about it.
"Bill Mueller, 3B, Dodgers He's not a power hitter and he's not really exciting to own, but Mueller usually carries a solid batting average, and he's 2B-eligible in some groups. And what's wrong with a .327-2-11 start, along with 12 walks? The Dodgers should consider hitting this guy higher in the lineup he looks like a perfect No. 2 man to me."
well i heard an unsubstaniated rumor that drabek was doing roids. But again, it was from a guy who had a friend that goes to drabeks high school. Haha, nothing concrete at all.
I'm sure logan white will do his homework though.
Cody Johnson has been raking this spring.
When they say: "He's a scrappy ballplayer" what they mean is: "He's a white kid that the fans like for some inexplicable reason."
When they say: "We have a veteran club this year." what they mean is: "Tell the trainer to stock up on Polygrip, Depends, Geritol, and prune juice and make sure the guys on our Triple-A club keep their bags packed."
When they say: "There's nobody warming up in the bullpen" what they mean is: "That's why you don't diss your manager in the press, he'll take revenge on your ERA."
When they say: "He has great fundamentals" what they mean is: "He can't hit, he doesn't walk, he can't field, but he always throws to the cutoff man."
When they say: "Welcome to FOX's coverage of the World Series" what they mean is: "Unless Tim McCarver gets laryngitis, your choices are the mute button or jamming an ice pick into your ear drum."
http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/say-what/
http://www.perfectgame.org/stories/06_03_27_whos_hot/list.pdf
cody johnson's numbers as of april 17th were:
.500 (29-58) with 13 HR, 6 doubles, 38 RBI, 40 R, 24 BB, 7 K, and 10 SB.
Anyone see the article on Izturis in today's LA Times? Ned still wants to move him to the outfield, but Izturis doesn't want to. "The Communicator" is going to have to work this out soon.
"The Communicator"
Aka "The Talking Ned"
I've heard many latino ballplayers described as scrappy. However, most if not all were middle infielders.
I want to see Izturis play the OF, bc I doubt I've ever seen a player as short at Izzy play the OF.
Let Izzy play OF and the 6'6 destroyer at SS. I'd be interesting to watch at least.
Or a player who hit as poorly.
Here's to turning that awfulness around...
If I have, I've managed to purge the memory from my mind.
Are you "planning" on "using" them?
how about this knock: he cant hit.
At least one of them. So far my cloning plan has not been successful. All I have been to able to produce is a goat that sounds like a parrot.
Perhaps you could invite the hand...
http://tinyurl.com/mqay7
Things I'd like to see:
Izturis at Catcher.
Guzman at 2nd base.
Navarro in CF.
There's no question Izzy's a great fielder, so moving him to the OF does seem odd given his main plus is his fielding at SS (not that he's a bad hitter, either). The Dodgers also obviously really like the guy and want him to stay, but he could become the odd man out. I think they'll back off on making him try the OF, see how his rehab goes, try to squeeze him into being their main backup IF'er (which still means a good amount of playing time given the likely need to rest Kent and surely Nomar, too, as well as possibility Furcal gets hurt at some point, too - hope not) - and then try to trade him.
Meanwhile...
I take it you like Furcal more right? Furcal is a good player but he can't stand next to Izzy when it comes to D.
why does everyone think Izzy is the end all be all on defense? Sure, he IS a really good defensive player. Yet his last few FPCT are as follows: .979, .977, .985, .977. Those numbers are better than Furcal's, but not enormously better. For example, last season Furcal had a better Fielding percentage, RF, and Zone Rating.
Let's not forget the fact that Furcal is MILES ahead of Izturis when it comes to offense. I'm sorry, but I'll take the guy who makes a couple more errors but can actually hit and get on base than the guy who is slightly better defensively, but couldn't hit water if he jumped out of a boat...
Meanwhile, whither Cody Ross?
there really isn't a place for him on the team, and that's probably for the best. We're having a hard enough time scratching across some runs as it is, so why do we want ANOTHER guy who can't hit in the lineup? It's bad enough watching Navarro try to hit....
So who could it be, assuming perfect health at that time?
Though I'd rather have Izturis than Robles, and rather have Robles than Martinez, and so on... meaning, if he could replace those guys, then it's one thing. But, yes, how many light hitting middle IFers do we need?
Martinez, Robles, Izturis, Alomar, Saenz, Repko will be our ultra versatile bench.
Izzy to the OF is a flat out stupid idea.
he's still in shock that we finally threw out a baserunner.
I know I am.
I believe the problem is that he just has wife and kids as test subjects and his kids are barely able to see over the counter or even pronounce the name of the food they want.
And I don't think his 3-year old daughter is enjoying drinking all that beer.
I was thinking that exact same thing.
He's the Jack Haley of the Dodgers. Just without a Dennis Rodman to babysit.
Or maybe it's like Tracey and Choi last year: The GM says he's on the team, the Manager says,"Get a close relationship with that bench..."
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.