Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
What happens when humbling experiences fail to humble?
I've only been following the mess in Pittsburgh from a distance, not enough to monitor lineups or in-game maneuvers, but enough to see that whatever excuses there might be for the Pirates' losing, ex-Dodger manager Jim Tracy has imported his pattern of not taking responsibility for any portion of it.
Given the resources the Pirates had, it would be wrong to blame all the Pirates' losing on Tracy. But as there was in 2005 with the Dodgers, there has again been plenty of finger-pointing by Tracy everywhere but at himself. And that's, well, that's a little too perfect for those of us who grew tired of his arrogance. Certainly, if the Pirates were winning, Tracy would not be shy about promoting his brand of baseball (with the phony Pittsburgh press appelation "Tracyball") as the reason.
If Tracy can only win when the talent is good, it's fair to ask, what good is he?
Putting any schadenfraude aside ... I am interested in knowing what are the real problems with the Pirates and what are imagined. Which should Tracy be doing that he isn't? What shouldn't he be doing that he is? Some of the Pirates' problems are clearly not Tracy's fault. Which ones are?
And what has Tracy done right? Feel free to make arguments in his defense, besides the aforementioned "it's not all his fault" - that's covered. What proactive moves by Tracy have paid off?
I'm not interested in piling on. I'm interested in objective reviews of the situation.
vr, Xei
He's trotting Burnitz out there no matter how badly he's hitting.
Most of the blame is really Littlefield's but Tracy refuses to play his better, younger players instead of the washed up vets they signed this winter.
Plus, the hubris of the man saying that the team just needed to listen to him and Colbert and they'd be competative.
And the absence of Sean Casey means that Craig Wilson gets to play first. That's a good thing. But it also means that the Pirates don't have many other options for right field other than Jeromy Burnitz.
Burnitz leads the Pirates in ABs. Mainly because he's walked just 5 times in 34 games. He has 24 fewer walks than Jason Bay. Burnitz has an OBP of .584.
Tracy needs to sit Burnitz as much as possible. If he didn't have such a big contract, they should just release him. They won't. They're stuck with him. Burnitz is just one big millstone around the neck of the Bucs offense dragging it down to Davy Jones's Locker and keeping them from being able to hoist the Jolly Roger.
The Pirates wasted a lot of money on Joe Randa. I don't see how they couldn't tell Randa would be a bust. Randa was awful after San Diego acquired him last year.
Tracy also hasn't been helped that the Pirates starters have all been bad. Oliver Perez has an ERA of 7.71. They're skipping his turn in the rotation because of a rainout. It's a bad year for 0 Perez's in the majors.
Duke has come back down to earth. Maholm is nothing special. Same goes for Snell.
Oh, and the Pirates don't field well either.
The Pirates need to watch the Colbert Report every night?
I never felt that there was a "Tracy" brand of baseball. In 2003, the games they won was based on good starters and great bullpen, I recall that they won something like 80% of the games where they scored 4 runs or more, unfortunately they could not score enough runs. In 2004, they won because of another good year for the bullpen and improved offense (Beltre, Finley later) while overcoming mediocre starting pitcher.
This year he has no starting pitching, an offense that wasn't going scare anyone even if Casey, Burnitz and Randa were producing and a very untested bullpen. But with the lowered expectations and football training camp 2 months away, he'll survive this year.
The other question is, which Littlefield player signings did Tracy influence? We know he wanted that power.
As to the original post - "What shouldn't [Tracy] be doing that he is?"
Managing?
I can't imagine Tracy wanted Burnitz after managing him in 2003 in L.A. The only guys Tracy influenced were Jose Hernandez and Mike Edwards. And apparently he didn't have enough pull to keep Giovanni Carrara in the minors.
Maybe there's somebody in the minors to play right field. Somebody there has to be better than Burnitz. Anybody.
Managing?
Geez, that's good. I'm out of practice.
It is early and once he gets hot he will carry that offense for awhile.
Plenty of good seats available.
As to the original post - "What should [Tracy] be doing that he isn't?"
Managing?
What positive contribution does a manager make to the team's success?
I don't think you can identify something positive that Jim Leyland has done in Detroit and something negative Jim Tracy has done in Pittsburgh other than that the Tigers have good players now.
The Tigers young pitchers are, for the most part, pitching very well. The Pirates young pitchers are all pitching very poorly.
Is Clint Hurdle a better manager now? I doubt Bad Altitude would agree. The Rockies have happened to find some good pitchers. (But they still have Tom Martin.) But Hurdle still wants to play for one run at Coors Field.
It seems very difficult (if not impossible) to isolate the manager's influence from everything else. The manager's most obvious influence is to put the lineup together everyday. When to pinch-hit and change pitchers are also important decisions to be made. Beyond that, a "good" manager (from the standpoint of the Sabre Philosophy) really shouldn't do much other than sit there and let the players play.
Seems to me that just about anyone could be a manager. Most of the people on this board would be at least as good (if not better) than people like Jimbo at putting the lineup together, and could probably do just as well at replacing players.
This is how I would do it.
"Odalis, please focus."
I rather like 15's twist, as well.
Tracy did some good things. He had the foresight to move Gagne to closer and he realized Hee Seop Choi and Antonio Perez were not good players. Tracy's handling of Jayson Werth in 2004 was phenomenal.
It's not all his fault, Bay's slump isn't his fault (though protecting him with Burnitz isn't helping), the mystery that is Oliver Perez isn't his fault, the terrible first couple turns of the rotation weren't his fault, but because of the arrogant way he assumed that "Tracyball" would fix all of our problems and now his arrogant "You didn't play, you wouldn't understand what I'm doing" interviews, he's making a lot of us Pirate fans unhappy.
They effectively have three players who can hit for power: Bay, Craig Wilson, and Ryan Doumit.
Doumit is a catcher but he got the Antonio Perez "he can't play defense" tag on him. Doumit also can play right field, so they should stick him there, with Wilson at first.
I'm sure at some point, the Pirates will put together some run of .500-plus ball, however brief, and Tracy will say, "See?"
In arrgh, me mateys news, the problem is Dave Littlefield, who is the most aptly named GM in the game outside of the Yankees' Brian Cashman. But more importantly, I think the problem is the McClatchey's, who are probably the targets of the complaints issuing from New York and Los Angeles that revenue sharing funds aren't being used to improve bad teams.
vr, Xei
Lots of good thoughts in this thread, but this one is another that rises above the crowd. That's exactly right.
here's a link to the rambling, meandering, slurring Rick Sutcliff video from the Padres game the other night:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6MT0JTwBehA&search=rick%20sutcliffe
It's gloriously terrible and amusing, and a little bit sad.
I found the link first at FJM.
Jason Bay - no brainer
Craig Wilson - can play LF, RF, 1st and catch in an emergency. Is below average defensively everywhere but I'd get him in the lineup against LHP everytime somewhere.
Freddie Sanchez - Burbank High graduate can play 2nd,SS, 3b and would be an excellent utility player. Much better hitter then Ramon or Robles.
That is it. This is a bad team at the moment and can only play decent baseball when Bay is banging. If he's not hitting, they are going to look like the worse team in the NL.
Exactly right.
#1? The Los Angeles Dodgers, with a team OPS of .884! Power outage? What power outage? However, the squad's pitchers (mostly the relievers, if I had to guess) have been letting the team down, serving up 5.22 earned runs per game. It's a testament to the offensive prowess the team has displayed in the last 10 games that they've gone 5-5.
I would have to agree. That just seemed weird. Probably because in the U.S., we call NCAA champions "National Champions".
Of course, we also call the World Series winner the "World Champions", so who knows?
And like I said in 49, I'm a college guy first and foremost. It's a habit. Sorry to have offended. =P
He's got good power, but little clue of the strike zone (77 K's in 190 AB's last year). Still, could he be any worse than Burnitz?
Sure the GM shouldn't have spent the money on Randa or Burnitz...but Tracy needs to take the initiative and sit Burnitz down..he's terrible protection for Bay.
Yeah, I read the smackdown. People forget that our "uber" prospects have not gotten the chance to play a lot in majors yet. How can you call them busts yet?
We weren't offended. We were just confused.
That joke took some research for me to understand.
But it was worth it!
However, I can sit through an entire college basketball game with no trouble.
Only if JD Drew goes down.
If he goes down, then its time to sell at the deadline.
http://www.bucsdugout.com/story/2006/5/14/15959/9148
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.