Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Steve Henson recounts the day after the Brad Penny blowup saga in the Times today. It still doesn't seem like there's any kind of consensus about Penny's health.
Penny's mysterious shoulder injury vanished as quickly as it appeared. ... Although Penny said he pitched with a sore shoulder two starts in a row, he got no sympathy for his actions from coaches or teammates. Trainer Stan Johnston examined the shoulder Tuesday and couldn't detect any problems.
Johnston also said Penny hadn't mentioned that his shoulder hurt during his start against the Colorado Rockies six days ago. Penny said he told Little that he wanted to come out of the game after five innings because of the pain, but that Little and pitching coach Rick Honeycutt urged him to continue which he did not do.
"The first time Brad mentioned it was the third inning of [Monday's] game," Johnston said. "It may be fatigue. It may be a dead-arm phase. He didn't go through it in spring training when most guys do."
Dr. Frank Jobe will examine Penny when the Dodgers return home Thursday. Penny, however, said the shoulder already felt better and that he expects to make his next start.
The generous explanation is that Penny's shoulder has been sore in a meaningless way. The problem is that that doesn't reconcile with Penny saying his shoulder was "killing" him, because if that were the case, Penny could easily injure himself trying to compensate for the significant pain. And there's no assurance that Penny isn't being encouraged to pitch through pain. Henson gives us the flat-out assertion that against Colorado, Penny was told to do so (less than two years after, as Will Carroll of Baseball Prospectus calls it, "Penny's famous 'one more' pitch").
Hopefully, the Dodgers have dodged one here. But this double-talk and non-talk, this general miscommunication, does not bode well for injury prevention down the road.
Honestly, I don't feel good about analyzing this kind of situation from afar, and the Dodgers have the right to scoff at my attempt to do so. But is there any reason to believe that if I asked the principals about it, they could give me a straight answer? I don't think anyone's trying to be less than honest, but I'm not sure the Dodgers as a group really understand what's going on with their injury culture.
Penny said he told Little that he wanted to come out of the game after five innings because of the pain, but that Little and pitching coach Rick Honeycutt urged him to continue which he did not do.
More red flags here than at a Moscow May Day parade.
This month is so out of proportion to Martinez's career, all I can say is I'm glad it happened for us. I wouldn't go crazy about it, though.
So I'm not quite as worked up about the double-talk coming out of the training staff about injuries or non-injuries. We like to believe that everything we're told is true, so that when we spot contradictions, we can know that either someone is lying or that everyone's not on the same page (lack of communication). But why should we ever learn about anything from what people say? In the NFL, Broncos coach Mike Shanahan is notorious for listing half his roster as "questionable" for the next game, to hide as much as possible from the next opponent.
It could be that Penny is hurt, and didn't tell anyone until it was convenient to look noble and self-sacrificing. In that case, Penny is to blame for being foolhardy.
It could be that Penny is hurt, did tell people, and that the manager and pitching coach are foolishly risking serious injury. In that case, Little/Honeycutt are to blame.
It could be that Penny is not hurt at all, but wanted to look like a victim when he was rightly pulled for surrendering 6 straight hits. In that case, Penny should just shut up. My little brother is like this - every time he loses at anything, he fakes an injury. More predictable than the sunrise.
Same goes for Gagne. Maybe he hid an injury, compensated, and caused a worse injury. Or maybe he's just injury-prone, and wants the "admission" of stoicism to hide that fact and produce the image that he's in control of things. If people buy that, then Gagne wins because he avoids the tag "injury prone" and gains the tag "warrior." Feh. In that sense, I completely agree with Jon that the latter tag is often a bad thing -- better it be called "selfish, testosterone-fueled, glory-hound."
Talk is cheap. Only believe speech when you can't come up with a good reason that the speaker might have to lie, mislead, dissemble, whatever. Of course, as Jon emphasises, in the case of injuries, often medical tests are indeterminate, and our only recourse is to ask the patient. In that case, take everything you year with a grain of salt. In the real world, there are hypochondriacs who seek attention and make up ailments. In the sports world, there is the risk of losing your job, career, and huge paycheck if you're labeled "damaged goods," so they eschew medical attention and hide ailments.
"People lie."
As stated in every episode of "House, M.D."
Aaron Sele is our philosopher's stone.
When I interviewed the Angels this month, the day after the clubhouse fight, Mike Scioscia hauled out the line that he's been in clubhouses that didn't get along but that were well-oiled machines on the field. It still strikes me that in the end, it's nice to have nice people around, but it doesn't affect the game on the field.
I'll haul out my old line - there were plenty of nice guys on the team last year. And so-called loners like Kent and Drew are still here. I find it hard to believe that Aaron Sele and Ramon Martinez are performing well because Milton Bradley, whom they have never played with as far as I know, isn't there.
I'm not trying to find a cloud to explain this silver lining - I'm just saying that it could be a lot worse. Like it was last year, when nearly every fill-in either stunk, got hurt themselves, or both.
Is Ramon Martinez the second coming of Tripp Cromer?
Maybe it's the return of Craig Counsell.
Great post.
18
The Dodgers have been lucky but some of that was created. You have to give some credit to the guy who has found success with Sele/Ramon/Saito each of who was a non-roster invitee. It would not be a stretch to say that the Dodgers have gotten the best production out of non-roster invitee's in baseball. I won't argue that Ned has been lucky but maybe the luck is the residue of design not just dumb luck. Even if all 3 of those players fail miserably in the future what they gave us in May, may have kept the season from tumbling out of control. That may sound like hyperbole, but Sele filled the black hole of the 3rd spot in the rotation, Saito righted a blighted bullpen that was Atlanta bad for a little while and Ramon has just played extremely well everywhere he's filled in. The key will be to understand that each of these players filled the niche when we needed them but we can't run them out there to much after the luster wears off and ruin the good they did in May. Ramon needs to continue to play sparingly, Sele needs to retire by July 1st, and Saito is the only one who I think can continue to give us solid work all season.
Speaking of which, we watched Woody Allen's "Match Point" over the weekend. It was my kind of movie, but I ended up not loving it. Could have been better.
I'm not saying that the contributions from Martin, Aybar, and Ethier have not been important but the Dodgers now have a solid 3-4-5 in the lineup that did not have last year after Bradley went down.
I'm not sure I understand this notion, just as I'm not sure I understand the notion of being "clutch." If there's an approach at the plate that maximizes your chances of reaching base, why not use that approach all the time, rather than just in certain situations?
I C...
You mean the Dodgers attack this year is like the 2002 or 2004 Angels?
We don't have a lot of home run power but we seem to be hitting a lot of doubles. Plus when Lofton/Furcal hit singles they quickly become doubles with the stolen base meaning we only need a single to bring them in not the normal 3 hits associated with a singles hitting team. The other thing I love about this team is that other then Kent all of the players are able to score from 2nd on a normal single. We have above average speed everywhere in the lineup except 2nd base and he's our power hitter. Even our catcher can run the bases. I love it. Course I'd rather have Carlos Lee in LF but if you don't have the power you better be able to maximize your chancing of scoring when you string together some walks and hits.
hehe, i better win this contest.
The opposite can also be said about good hitters. They press and become less patient with RISP because they are so desperate to drive in runs (Shawn Green).
Andre Ethier and Jeff Kent each have 2 home runs with RISP and 2 out.
If Glass loosens the purse strings, Moore may actually be able to improve the team. Good thing they hired him before the draft, so Baird couldn't screw anything up. Now I'm positive they won't take Hochevar.
Also, Rosenthal seems to think a Nevin-Hairston deal is essentially done. Unless Texas is paying his entire salary, I tend to think the Cubs will be very disappointed.
Isn't lee only a few weeks away now? Shouldn't they have done this deal weeks ago? And shouldn't they just go after Tony Clark instead?
http://tinyurl.com/ndjov
http://tinyurl.com/mqhpk
But they've capped legal expenses at $150K.
I guess they won't send anyone to actually argue the case if the Court of Appeal calls for it.
That's the best he's swung a bat all season.
Ugh. I feel dumb. And numb.
I didn't notice at the time whether Penny was redecorating the dugout with his right or left hand.
57 Jeebus.
60 - Sweet! IT's about time Shields got the call, I saw him throw a couple innings in spring training and he looked a lot better than the Jesus Colome's of the world. Good luck to him.
Sibilance...sibilance...
Yeah im friends with a fmaily member of his and ive met him a couple of times he is a down earth guy. A couple of us we will be watching his game tonite and rooting for the guy!
After months of reading here, I can't believe my first comment is to disagree with Mr. Timmerman.
At least Law and Order is not preempted by stupid basketball tonight.
Few have done so and lived to post about it.
Good luck to your buddy. I saw him pitch in Arizona this fall and he looked very good. I closed my eyes and picked him in my roto league so I'm hoping for success. Plus he's a DevilRay so I'm really rooting for him to succeed.
Thanks. I think he should be solid, he has a changeup and if he mixes his pitches he should just fine. He had something like 60ks and 6BBs this year!
76 OK, that's freaky. I decided to look it up to see how different the 2002 and 2004 Angel offenses were, and the answer is that they were just about exactly the same:
2002: 282/341/433
2004: 282/341/429
The Dodgers are currently at 278/362/429. So they are being more patient than those Angel teams, but not by as much as I would have guessed.
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/05/30/Sports/Tears_mark_the_real_m.shtml
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.