Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Another day has come without a solution to Jeff Kent's injured hand. An MRI is the next step, Kent reportedly told Fred Roggin.
That means Ramon Martinez will put his 1.176 May OPS - the best figure for any month of his career - on the line. Martinez's next-best month was a .917 OPS in June 2000, according to Retrosheet. The career .718 OPSer is 14 for 30 with two doubles, a home run and five walks this month.
* * *
And as a nice bonus:
I vote Delwyn.
What about LaRoche at 3B?
They could also call up jtd to play third.
Of course, I don't remember exactly what "x" is.
It's 10 days unless there is an injury. Then you can bring someone right back up.
Furcal
Lofton
Nomar
Drew
Aybar
Ethier
Lucille
Martin
Tomko
Same as yesterday. So where does Kemp fit in now that the outfielders are healthy? Send him back down while his confidence is still high? Give him 3 starts a week?
Also... at what point do we start talking contract extension for Nomar?
"In the meantime, the Dodgers expect to have Jeff Kent back in the next couple days after a hand problem has held him out. Kent's problem is in the "web" of the hand, between thumb and forefinger, and sounds a bit like DeQuervain's syndrome, an inflammatory condition that can radiate into the wrist. I can't find any comps in the database--and worse, my top research assistant has left for the summer to try and help a major league team--but the problem is usually controllable with cortisone injections. I'm not sure if this is the actual problem for Kent, so we'll watch closely."
I'll say this for the injuries that befall the Dodgers, from Izzy's TJ operation, Werth's mysterious wrist, Gagne's nerve, and this one, an ACL tear would be refreshing.
I guess a team with a bunch of rookies turns into a rebuilding project when they stop winning.
Also... at what point do we start talking contract extension for Nomar?
After the season. We don't want to make the same mistake we made with Kent.
Ned was at Jacksonville yesterday watching the Suns. I really hope they don't call up Tony Abreu. He is definitely not ready right now, hitting wise. Calling up Laroche to play 3B and moving Aybar to 2B seems like the best option.
Why hasn't K Loft gotten any rest? We now have Kemp on the roster who can play CF. K Loft hasn't gotten a rest in a while. Maybe I shouldn't question King Little.
Never thought, I'd ever see that statement.
I guess a team with a bunch of rookies turns into a rebuilding project when they stop winning.
Right. The question is, how many rookies can a winning team sustain in its starting lineup before it starts to play baseball like teams from Florida?
The question is, when and if everyone is healthy, who's really forcing the issue for the starting lineup and roster decisions for the remainder of the year. Martin has basically won the starting job, and forced a decision on Navarro vs. Alomar (which can't be that hard, can it?). I'd have to believe that as well as Aybar has played, he goes back to the bench. Does Ethier, or some combination of Ethier/Kemp/Repko lessen the desire to trade for an outfielder? I really think Kemp is just up to get a taste, but who knows?
BTF is a good place to get yelled at by a Mets fan. Or you can read the polished stylings of Backlasher about steroid use.
It's like Damaged Dodger Mad Libs!
"Another day has come without a solution to (player)'s injured (body part)..."
I can already tell I'm about to take a turn for the bitter, willing to exploit any mention of the team as an opportunity to complain about the training staff. Unchecked, this festers into an out-of-control obsession - and by then I'm a total downer to be around.
Another writer's take on such bitterness (over a far more serious topic): "When I was in college, an Armenian-American acquaintance told me about his grandfather's obsession with the Turkish genocide against his people in the early part of the 20th century. To a comment of 'nice weather, today,' the old man habitually replied 'What does it matter when our people were slaughtered?'"
To that, I reply, "What does it matter when Werth loses his career to a simple HBP?"
Sheesh, why don't we just move him to catcher too?
I decided to look it up to see how different the 2002 and 2004 Angel offenses were, and the answer is that they were just about exactly the same:
2002: 282/341/433
2004: 282/341/429
That's freakily similar. The Dodgers are currently at 278/362/429. So they are being more patient than those Angel teams, but not by as much as I would have guessed.
Usually I do one ballot a year where I just vote for all the bald guys. Which is a lot harder now that Matt Williams and Kirk Gibson have retired.
14 doubles
9 homeruns
WHY GOD?? WHY???
Archie Bunker.
And you should change your name from another bob to a lesser bob. j/k.
But I'll probably have to wait in line behind Another Steve, Another Marty, Another Toy Cannon, Another Nate Purcell, Another Eric Enders, Another D4P, Another Suffering Bruin, etc.
I mean, technically I'm too young to know. And I don't watch network TV as a matter of personal policy. And yet I don't remember a time in my life when I didn't know who Archie Bunker was.
How do you know for sure if you don't know who it is?
Andrew, when younger, I loved that special game when the ballot showed up, poking the little chads out for all the Dodgers (didn't know then they had a name), finding a cute usher to hand it back to, and waiting to see who would win. Sure I did. I liked the All-Star game too, just to see them all wearing their different caps.
I was a kid.
You're so vain you probably think this song is about you.
;P
Nice.
I think that simile describes the way I feel about most of life in general.
Well, actually all of us Bobs in this world worship the one true Bob, i.e. Bob Newhart. He is not a divinity. He's more like Buddha. He's led an exemplary Bob-like life and all of us Bobs try to follow down his path of proper Bobdom. Some Bobs stray and turn into Bob Saget or Bob Eubanks. We pray for those Bobs and hope that one day that they will be redeemed to their appropriate Bobness.
Many Bobs cried when they found out that Katie Couric was replacing Bob Schieffer. Bob Schieffer holds a special place among Bobs in that his given name is Bob. His parents took one look at him as a newborn and said, "He seems like he'll be an OK guy, let's call him Bob."
Even worse, some turn into Robs.
Some Bobs stray and turn into Bob Saget or Bob Eubanks. We pray for those Bobs and hope that one day that they will be redeemed to their appropriate Bobness.
Not to mention Bob Loblaw.
I also always mention that my All Star party is centered around serving food from the host city. Pittsburgh should be fun. Perrogis (sp?), right?
I went to a Dodgers game recently and I was in section 122 and Sid was the usher. My friend had to take a picture of him as a souvenir.
Someone actually picked up a beachball and handed it to him.
Even Bob Saget?
Now that's the Tomko I remember from the Giants.
/Mary Tyler Moore
So is a Tuesday night in the middle of the summer.
Bob replied, "It's...it's...a...uh...uh...stammer."
So Eric doesn't remember when Bob and Jerry tried to include Carol's husband in their card game and had to play Klopsky and Sneeho?
Or which college Jerry attended?
He had TV shows in the 80s and 90s. I thought you were late 20s/early 30s like me.
I missed that one. I haven't quite seen all the Seinfelds because I didn't start watching until it was in syndication, for reasons described in 71.
I only watched "Newhart" avidly. I've seen very little of "The Bob Newhart Show."
I only watched "Newhart" avidly. I've seen very little of "The Bob Newhart Show."
Loved Bob Newhart and all the characters on his two shows but the 1st one was the best.
I hate watching old TV shows even though I know they made me laugh mightily once upon a time. They just make me feel old.
The Bob Newhart Show::Newhart
All In the Family::Archie's Place
The path to finding your inner Bob starts with a change of but one letter. What matters is what's inside you? Do you embrace the Bob lifestyle? It can't be defined. You just have to know what it is.
My wife is a San Antonio Mexican and she loved Newhart and Martin Mull and his "History of White People in America".
You have got to be kidding me.
You are starting to sound like L. Bob Hubbard.
That doesn't work, though, because "Newhart" wasn't a spinoff of "The Bob Newhart Show." It was a completely unrelated series starring the same actor.
Of course, I'm not counting the series finale, when Bob woke up in bed with his wife from the first series and complained of a horrible nightmare he just had about an inn in Vermont.
The Incredible Hulk was more our style. We'd put an abrupt end to our baseball game when 5:30 pm came around on Friday evening. We also liked the Dukes of Hazzard, but you have to admit, the car chases, the car jumps, Daisy Duke shorts and the Boss Hogg caricature was much more accessible to an audience of varied backgrounds.
http://tinyurl.com/okdc9
I know, but you'd have gotten a bad SAT score with that one.
Eastwood.
Is there a Jason Book?
I'm surprised this hasn't come up before, as I talk about El Paso from time to time on this site.
The Jason Book is the companion book to the Dodgers 2005 season highlight DVD!
So, you still live there? My parents still live there, though I've escaped to Socal. ;-) (apologies to the rest of the posters for this personal convo)
You're apologizing as I get everyone to discuss my first name for about 30 minutes?
For some reason none of my browsers are working. They just say error connecting to internet, but AIM works and I can navigate with Windows Explorer. I checked firewall and none of my browsers are being blocked, any suggestions?
Off now to watch the Tomko implosion on tivo... enjoy the game, everybody.
How long do the Dodgers stay in contention with Seo-Sele-Tomko? Thats the question.
Looks like janitor number one is starting to me.
Byrnes + BOB = Good fantasy baseball player.
Your father likely got paid a lot less than Odalis Perez or Tim Hamulack.
Morons.
Moron.
You're crazy. Those two guys are AWESOME!
The last 4 games, our starters went 2+, 4+, 6, 3 and counting.
Now Penny might be hurt and we can only count on Lowe and Sele (hehe) to give us consistent quality starts.
How things change so quickly.
If the season were a 5-course meal, it's starting to look as if Tomko filled up on appetizers.
I think Tomko will be o.k. everybody has bat starts.
This is his third bad start in a row
5/20: 4ER in 6IP vs. LAA
5/26: 6ER in 4.2IP vs. DC
5/31: Not good so far.
He was a hole before the season began. Tomko's career has been filled with bad starts. But this year specifically, he's had 4 bad starts in a row. His first he just got extremely lucky in Colorado bc he gave up a ton of fly balls. His last 3 he's gotten torched.
I guess it depends on your definition of a "hole". I think a "hole" is a spot that can be reasonably improved. Tomko is probably a 4.50+ ERA pitcher, so to me thats a hole. Most teams should be able to improve upon that, or they wont be contenders for very long.
he pitch a desent inning so i'm cool with it.
Yeah. Isn't Repko the Emergency Catcher?
Tracy's invigorating "blame the players" pep talks...?
Eh its 7-1 who cares.
We've disagreed on this assessment all year. Point me to a team who's number 4 and 5 pitchers have a better then 4.50 ERA and I'll concur but you won't be able to do so. He'll end the year between 4.00 and 4.50 and do a fine job as the number 4 pitcher. This isn't 1968 but 2006 and I'll take an average pitcher in the 4 hole. Anyone who thinks they can put out a rotation where everyone is 4.50 or below is living in a polyanna world. He's hit a rough spot as he was due since he was pitching over his head.
Cardinals - Carpenter under 3.00 every other starter including Mulder/Suppan/Marquies over 4.50. Ponson doesn't have enough IP to count.
Mets - Only Glavine and Pedro meet your criteria. Banninster doesn't have enough IP to count.
Reds - Arroyo and Harang, Rameriz only 37 IP
I could go on and on but you did mention these 3 teams as the teams you consider good since the Dodgers had such an easy schedule since we haven't played these so called good teams yet.
The plain fact is that in todays world, a 4.50 ERA from your 4 or 5 starter is acceptable unless you want to have a 50 million$ rotation and even the Yankee's/RedSox/BlueJays/Mets have been unable to buy a deep rotation.
Too bad Weaver isn't here.
0-0 top of the 9th.
Let them be GM if they ever can...
Yes, and in the AL that is impressive. If Maroth had been given enough time he would have climbed to 4.50 and Kenny Rogers always fades during the not summer. He's one of best April/May/June starters in baseball and one of the worse in July/August/Sept. Will be curious to see how Verlander does as his IP start to climb. I expect the Tigers to do a fade but the start has been impressive.
Thats what i see when Lowe/Penny/Sele/Tomko/Seo start.
The argument, before the season, was over whether that was a reasonable projection. His homerun rate has (as was widely projected) jumped back up (even before tonight) to his pre-PhoneCoPark level. He's still striking out more and walking fewer, which is surprising.
Anyway, no fair redefining what the argument was over. It wasn't that 4.00-4.50 isn't good enough, it was that Tomko wasn't good enough to put that up. Jury's still out on that.
-Foul bunt
-Foul bunt
-Missed bunt, out on strikes.
The Detroit NL franchise won the pennant in 1887.
(I know, that conversation's ship has sailed, but it popped into my head right after I left work.)
If we get to comment 419, I'm sure Andrew's comment will make sense. ;-)
giving a run per inning!
There's only one way to get back into the rotation: pitch well enough that they have to let you start, or have one of the starting pitchers get hurt.
That was always the argument. Whether its smart to pay money for anything that is known to be average, mediocre, and with little upside? It goes back to spending 4.5 mils on Tomko to ERA 4.50, or giving the league minimum to Houlton to ERA 4.75. Where's the marginal benefit?
I don't get what your saying Bob, is it still 0-0?
$4.5MM is a lot of money, but for a league average pitcher, it's got to be around average. The problem is, it's a steep curve between average and replacement level, so paying that much for an older, little-upside Houlton isn't bright. Anybody know what replacement level ERA (or DIPS, maybe, or whatever else anybody would prefer) is? 4.50 is average, right?
Maybe Tomko really will be better than average this year. If he is, he's got to be worth the money he's making this year. Right? Anybody arguing against that? I could be wrong--maybe I was just taking for granted that everybody would be okay with a league average pitcher making average (if idealistically too much) money. But that's not what I took the argument to be. Sorry if I presumed too far.
Certainly true if the farm system is barren.
But the Dodgers have Orenduff, Billingsley, Houlton to name 3 that could be better than someone league average or below (like Tomko is). And the salary structure also makes them more affordable. I doubt 1yr of service time clock was enough of deterrent to sign Brett Tomko to a 2-yr deal. It was just a poor decision every way you look at it.
True, I wasn't saying the score. I was just remarking on the DBacks using three pitchers named Brandon.
Say the going rate for a steel worker is 18/hr. Hiring a steel worker and paying him 18/hr, no one is going to frown upon that. But if the company also had someone willing to work for 10/hr, to do a similar job, it'd be a bad decision to hire the worker making 18/hr.
Its just that there were cheaper options (Houlton, Billingsley, Orenduff) that also have the possibility of being better, than the pitcher that ultimately signed (Tomko).
The saved money could go towards a better #5.
ohhhh, thank goodness i read that wrong. Why didnt he start?
Why is Kemp still on the team I think is a better question.
Yeeee-ow.
I think the blocking prospects argument is weaker now that Grittle or Colletti, or both, have demonstrated no compunction in banishing Odalis to the pen, deservedly or not. I don't see why they would sit $8MM but not $4.5MM.
There's a rabbit,
No, there's a deer
No, there's a stork on the loose!
This is why you don't make decisions based on three starts.
"For years people would say I'm a line-drive hitter who should hit the ball over the shortstop and just use my speed," he says. "But I'm a guy who can do much more than that. I can hit homers, I can drive the ball deep, and that's what I started to do last year. I want to be known as more than a guy with speed."-Crawford
He has the right mentality. I hate when dumb coaches tell fast players to hit it on the ground even when they have power. I've heard people say that Soriano would be a better hitter if he hit the ball on the ground. This is why players like Juan Pierre are overvalued.
Tomko, bad three starts and all, has certainly deserved his spot this year.
I hate those.
Time to plan ahead and all that.
Sanchez pitching well.
1. He won't be good enough to deserve the spot, much less the money
2. He'll block Billingsly
3. I hate Tomko
Number one is, to this point, wrong; but it's still open, and threatening to come back around. Number two seems very unlikely. Number three abides; sure it's silly, but Miltie and D4P get Kent, so, I don't know. . .
what did he ever to do you Andrew?
woo hoo! like Steiner said if the Mets win "no harm no foul"
San Fran has made a living of producing enough pitchers for trade bait. We can perhaps trade for some or buy some as free agents. But proven starters are the most expensive commodity. So it would help to grow as much as possible.
No! Clearly our system needs more of Tampa Bay's bullpen! What are you smoking?
1st C Jackson - solid hitter
2nd J Upton - Griffy like potential
SS S Drew - all star potential
3b Tracy - already a nice player
C Montero - decent catcher
RF Quentin - all around skills
CF C Young - all star potential
LF Carlos Gonzales - all star potential
This is assuming they move Upton to the infield since they already have a great CF prospect in Young. They could also switch Drew to 2nd and Upton to SS. Or trade C Young or Drew for pitching.
They could be getting 60 jacks a year from the keystone combo and spend all their money on pitching since the kids will be cheap.
Will be fun to see how it plays out.
and this is a new juicy rumor from it:
Here's what else is out there, rumor-wise: 1. Through the grapevine, there's been talk that Miller will definitely not go No. 1, and his camp will try very hard to ensure that he doesn't go No. 2. I'd have to think he'd go No. 3, then, to the Rays, though there have been whispers that they may try to force him into a free-fall down to the Cubs at No. 13.
he has the dodgers picking Kershaw (yay!) at 7 and Brooks Brown (eh) at 26
http://tinyurl.com/mtmen
I better find something dan good to smoke!
311- There's no way that Miller would fall to 13. If the Dodgers passed on Miller, I'd find Ned, McCourt, and White and tear them to pieces with my bare hands. I will be thrilled if Kershaw falls to us.
if anything, they would want miller to come to the dodgers. system loaded with talent, a little think on high ceiling starting pitchers, he could be the #2 for a very dominant dodgers team in a couple of years. But maybe Logan White doesnt want to give out a major league contract.
They did, I just think they are going to be so happy with C Young that they will move him back to the infield.
Because Nomar draws so many walks!
Two words: Ted Williams
And 232 walks.
If Tampa pulls in Lincoln they will start to have the making of some serious pitching. Kazmir, Neiman, W Davis, Lincoln, and maybe Townsend can get untracked at some point. I can't wait for the day the 50 millon payroll of the DevilRays take down the Yankee's or Redsox.
Regarding the BA title explanations: fine. Humbug, but fine.
Well, the dodgers won't be too bad either with a potential of:
1B Nomar, very good hitter
2B DeWitt, good hitter for a 2B
SS Furcal, great leadoff hitter
3B LaRoche, all star potential
C Martin, all star catcher potential
RF Drew, very good hitter
CF Kemp-skys the limit
LF Ethier, very good all around player
The line up would probably look something like:
Furcal
DeWitt
Nomar
Kemp
Drew
LaRoche
Ethier
Martin
that's what I call fun to watch. And if we get another great pitcher from the draft to compliment Billingsley, Penny, and Lowe, our pitching would be very dominant as well.
Ryan Wagner too. I really wanted him.
Just picking out a few random players:
Drew Anderson, Adam Rosales, James Avery (he looks like a real prospect as does Sam Lecure)
hahahha kelvim escobar has a myspace~!!!
I love his favorite television shows:
"playboy channel definitely"
337 Where's Guzman?
311 Woo hoo, I have Kershaw and Brooks Brown as my first two picks for that contest thing. Front row here I come!
It was a funnier but not-DT friendly word where I've subbed in rear.
Traded for a solid pitcher.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.