Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
On this Hall of Fame Induction Day, the best I have to offer you is that my 46-month-old daughter watched two minutes of I Love Lucy and got hooked. She wanted to see the same scene again, then asked if it was a show for grown-ups, then asked if she could watch it too, then asked for us to call her "Lucy" the rest of the night.
Ah, parenting.
Putting aside whether one is better off playing outside or reading a book, I found myself wondering if I Love Lucy holds up for today's younger folks. Not all Lucy moments are created equally, but I'd hate to see them forgotten.
I became a fan nearly 35 years ago, when there were under 10 television channels and 25 years of television history, and this kind of programming wasn't that unusual. Now, do people under the age of 18 or 12 even stop changing channels when they see something in black and white?
Apparently, it's possible.
(This Dodger Thoughts interlude to take your mind off the Monday trading deadline was brought to you by Vitameatavegamin. Makeup by Max Factor. The part of the curmudgeon was played by Charles Lane. Dodger Thoughts is a ShiftyJ production.)
* * *
Appreciate the break, as I get ready to go to the game, is it a Subway day or InNOut?
I'm young enough that I don't remember ever not having Cable TV as a kid. Despite all the other choices, I Love Lucy held up then, so I don't see why it wouldn't now.
I remember hearing about it as a little kid, but we never had it.
Didn't it show Dodgers games?
base hit> Aybar has his first two Atl RBIs
5 - Wow!
My original thought process was that Betemit replaced Aybar.
If Nomar is not on the DL than I guess Tomko replaced Baez and Loney was called up when Aybar was traded.
Interesting to see who goes. Betemit gets the start at 3rd today. Loney's at 1st. Izzy's at 2nd..... and Hall's behind the plate (joy).
Still, though, I'm very excited to see Loney and Betemit.
But Dodger games were on ON so I was a little bummed to not have that.
Z Channel was one of the first pay cable stations in the US, and its programming chief, Jerry Harvey was sort of a famous kind of guy in the industry because he more or less pushed the edge and got a lot of stuff produced that would have never been produced.
2Drop the gun and pick up the In-N-Out.....
And their payroll goes up to, what, 200 million?
And no room there for Ricky Ledee now, I'm guessing?
Given what Cingular Wireless pulled on me, and has since been busted for, I will welcome a class-action law suit everytime.
As far as creditors go, yes. They should be able to call at 3:00 AM, show up on ones doorstep at whatever hour, and if it becomes evident they're not going to get their money they should result to vandalism. If, say, they are out $3000, they should bust out a couple windshields, dent some fenders, and bust some windows. I firmly believe that.
(SB raises his hand)
(long, deep drawn out sigh)
I remember a "Thirtysomething" episode where one of the women said she was going to watch "Lucy" and a guy said, "But you don't watch telelvision."
She replied, "Lucy is not television, Lucy is God."
To be clear, I'm supposed to be monitoring/editing commercials during sports and that one is totally not appropriate for a 5 year old. But he seems OK.
Good times.
My mom saw the trailer for that when she saw the new Pirates movie, and she was not happy.
30
said ;-)
The Yankees payroll is ridiculous, and they still may not make the playoffs. Their pitching is questionable and Lidle gives them more depth but won't scare anyone. Abreu could get a second life in NY, or he could just continue his power outage. Then they have a logjam in the OF when the injured players come back. But they don't care about that I suppose...
Let me start by saying the Lerners are some of the nicest people you'd ever want to meet. I sincerely wish them and the Nats much success.
We got to the suite about 20 mins before game time. There were about 10 people in there, one of which was Jamie McCourt. She talks. . . alot and fast. She is intense. She's a hit and run driver. She meets you, talks AT you, and moves on to the next person. (On the other hand, she wasn't there to see me.) A few minutes later Frank came in. He was very warm and listened more than he talked. He was very nice and spent a lot of time talking with my Mom who knows less about baseball than, say, Bill Plaschke. In contrast to Jamie, when he is speaking with you he has an easy style. I told him I liked the Betemit trade but joked that he had to stop now and preserve the prospects. He gave me a courtesy laugh and told me that was the idea "keep some of the prospect while sprinkling experienced veterans around them." Wait a minute, I didn't say "some"prospects and I didn't say anything about vets. He has been Ned-washed. A few minutes later Frank and Ted were in the corner having a private conversation and I was sure they were dealing Soriano right there. Of course, they didn't even mention it they were just being social. (Told myself I had to dial it back and be a little cooler)
As I mentioned in the other thread, the Dodgers want Soriano and have offered Izzy and some low level minor leaguer. The Nat's actually like Izzy but want more. They want a Major League ready pitcher i.e. Bills. I couldn't actually say aloud "no no no!!!" I got the impression that the Dodgers were saying no to such a deal but the conversations were not over. Bowden was not there. They said he was back at the hotel working the phones which were very busy. Apparently Kasten wants to re-sign Soriano and thinks he can. But the others, Bowden, and Ted and Mark want to move him for ML ready prospects. They really want to reestablish a quality farm system. Although they wouldn't say it out loud, MLB cannibalized the franchise the last few years. Just my opinion, I would not expect Soriano to re-up in DC and would not expect a trade until close to the deadline Monday.
This part was pretty cool. At one point, Kasten came in and quietly took Ted and Mark out into the hallway. It was clear they had an offer that was in play. When Ted came back in I asked whether Soriano would be coming out of the game. He said not yet. Now that its been reported I don't feel bad posting it here, the offer is from Huston. I got the impression it was an offer worth entertaining although it was still "light" as far as the Nats were concerned. Mark Lerner would not specifically say who was involved. While the Lerners will have final say, they will rely on Bowden and Kasden.
Bob, I don't think you will have to concern yourself with your "favorite" manager next season.
Sam, I used your Old Navy Naming rights line. They had not heard it before so, of course, I took full credit. :-) They are apparently in discussions with a Company and I think fairly close to strking a naming deal but the name was not mentioned.
As you might expect, the Lerners being real estate people are much more involved in the development of the new stadium than the personnel moves. They are leaving player decesions to Kasden and Bowden. They were very impressed with the Dodger suites and how clean the stadium is. I guess RFK is pretty run down. They were also suprised how many pricing options there were in terms of seating at DS. They said they will not have nearly as many levels at the new stadium.
Overall it was electric just to be in a room with management approaching the deadline.
I'm sure I have forgotten a few things but in the meantime, anyone want to guess how much a team spends on baseballs over the course of a season?
Izturis, a Gold Glove shortstop two years ago, is no closer to returning to his natural position, but at least he can view it from the right side for a while.
"Second is easier than third," he said. "I agreed to play third to help the team win. I just want to play every day. I don't want to sit on the bench."
Maybe that's what the problem with Valentin was last year.
Why do teams always seem to acomodate the Yankees? They have nothing to trade very year, and they still make trades.
Exactly my thoughts. It is so exasperating to see that their farm system is threadbare, yet they somehow manage to pull off deals like this. They have so much cash to burn.
To make room for Betemit, Nomar is heading to the DL, retroactive to July 25. It was everyone's hope that he would be able to play by Tuesday, but while he can swing just fine, he can't run full speed and cut corners just yet. He'll be eligible to come off on Tuesday, Aug. 8 vs. Colorado.
I couldn't begin to guess, but I'm curious.
Here's a trade for you: Furkel for Miguel Tejada. In my own seat of the pants, non-researched way, I think this makes sense.
Is it common that a team would enter into an extension w/a pure rookie like Zimmerman? I gather the goal is to buy out a couple of arb years -- how many years total would that take?
Talk to you night latish tonight.
A pitcher with 326 career victories shouldn't need a strong performance to enhance his trade value, but Cubs right-hander Greg Maddux entered Saturday's game against the Cardinals with a 6.03 ERA since May 1. He likely increased his appeal by pitching six innings and allowing only one run.
The Cubs are willing to pay a significant portion of the approximately $3 million remaining on Maddux's contract if they receive a quality player in a trade. One interested club wanted the Cubs to pay all of the money and accept only a mid-level prospect, according to a major-league source. The Dodgers, Maddux's most likely suitor, are exploring other options first.
22 mil for a year and a couple of months, for a guy who seems to have lost his homer touch definitely limits the number of potential buyers.
This was a salary dump, pure and simple. If they can use the money to sign one or two free agents that will help them next year, they'll be more than happy. Unfortunately they'll be using that money to waive at the same pitchers we'll be going after.
Still, he is a very productive player. He hits for a decent average and walks a ton, and if you value this kind of stuff, he steals a lot of bases.
And Philadelphia essentially got nothing worthwhile for him. A twenty year old shortstop, who I admittedly am unfamiliar with, but is likely to be blocked by Jimmy Rollins. A reliever who I now learn is twenty seven, and is most likely barely replacement level. A PTBNL, which unless it's a steal, is probably going to be some roster filler type player.
I don't claim to be a mind reader, but you could have asked for a better prospect group, (or even single prospect), from another team if your goal was just to unload his contract.
Bob is like on Vacation or something I think.
Awful deal, Stand Pat is definitely trying to out-horrible the Rolen for nobody and Schilling for nobody deals.
I do doubt that Abreu's value is that low that no other team would trade for him.
Didn't that mastercard commercial say that new baseballs were $8 or $9 back in '98? My guess is they're like $10 apiece now (official balls, you know).
But Dick's Sporting Goods sells them for about $80 a dozen.
Are you sure the Yanks have agreed to pick up Abreu's option? I think the option was the reason it took so long to get a deal done and I read somewhere that Abreu agreed to forego that part if he was traded to either of the NY teams or Boston
5 years worth 64M , will make in 2003-8.5M plus 3M signing Bonus, in 2004-10M, in 2005-12.5 and in 2006-13M, in 2007-15M, and in 2008- Team Option worth 16M ;or 2M Buyout- + Salary Can increase 275K the next year for MVP 1st place finish or 150K 2nd place in voting or 100K for 3rd place- + the deal includes Complete NO-TRADE Clause- + BONUSES he has received: 50K in 2004 for Silver Slugger, 50K for 2005 All-Star selection, 75K for 2005 Gold Glove
What's Grittle's fetish with batting the catcher in the 8-hole?
This is the return of George. His meek son-in-law wouldn't have done this deal.
When I was a kid, Lucy had her other shows on, like "Here's Lucy," which could have been an ad for the emphysema association. Gale Gordon chasing "Mrs. Carmichael" around from one ditzy predicament to another. I guess it was pretty funny, but far from classic comedy.
We have a mediocre pitching staff. We have numerous injuries. How come we're not at the top of the wild card? hehe
I swear, sometimes you guys just absolutely kill me.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the saber-objection to basestealers is when they fail, right? A player who actually moves from first base to second base successfully, placing himself in what old-timers used to call "scoring position," has some remote connection, I believe, to runs scored, right? Or is that retrograde thinking?
I believe that stealing is only worth a try if you can convert at over an 80% rate according to most statistical analysis. I haven't looked at Abreu's numbers so I don't know how his percentage is.
The Braves announcers are huge homers, but that is extreme even for them.
Players who hit for power and steal bases also tend to age better than those who don't do one or either of those, fwiw.
So there you go. Thanks for the stat.
What's Grittle's fetish with batting the catcher in the 8-hole?*
Grady couldn't hit as a catcher so I'm guessing.....
I need to re-read Bill James on this; IIRC, Alvin Davis and Tom Brunansky were his poster boys for poor aging because of their "old players'" skills.
NDR, But I don't agree with that.
Unless he improves his walk rate and/or average profoundly, I think Francouer is destined to be the really poor man's Alfonso Soriano for a few years.
115-
Why not?
But Scouts love him!
And they are never wrong.
Entering today, he's at 278/352/380/732.
Tejada for Furk straight up would make some sense. Balt ain't going to pay his back loaded contract. If we got Tejada w/o losing Furk we would be well on the way to paying 100 mil to try and get offense out of shortstops, the most expensive place to get it. Thats entertaining to watch, but not when your team does it.(Think Yanks.)
how do you think a guy with great hands lookes (he looked great)
having no money??
He didn't look bad. Throw was a little high, but not bad for a first time.
Francouer has an OPS of .734 (!)
Rafeal Furcal has an OPS of .732 coming into this game, just to compare.
I don't understnad it either but I came from a 3rd world contry too, So I saw it first hand. my dad was able to prvide me with a glove, but I saw it & I understand it.
I'm still trying to figure out what that means?? [scratching head & thinking]
Ha, that's a good name for it. Emil Brown with his six home runs, has been more productive this year than Francouer, as has old friend Willy Aybar.
Talking about the game, if we trade for any National outfielders, I hope it's Ryan Church.
What made me laugh, though, was the way the original post sniffed aristocratically at Abreu's skills as a base-stealer. It reminded me of my grandmother talking about rock and roll. You know, it has its charms if you go in for that sort of thing, although it's a bit vulger, n'est-ce pas?
Didnt Hendrickson just drop the ball or something?
I don't think I expressed any emotion either way about base-stealing. I specifically used the objective "you" there.
LOL'ed!!
Ok, they're hurting his fantasy owners over the course of his series
However, he was caught stealing to end the game.....
I'm trying to find an easy definition online for ISOpower but I can't find one right now.
More importantly Betemit with a leadoff double.
ISOpower explanation.
.280/.400/.500 career player. Excellent defense in RF. He's fine.
After all, everything Midas touches turns to gold. Look no further than the Dodgers' starter today.
Ouroboros.
I think he is, but hearing Vinnie say, he won't pitch till tuesday makes you wonder.
Just getting to DT and reading through the posts, so this one was posted a while ago. If the point is that Francoeur is almost as bad as Furcal, it is understated; if it is that Furcal is even worse than Francoeur, it is just plain wrong. Furcal is a SS, Francoeur a RF.
Which brings me to a question: is there a chart somewhere with average OPS by position? Seems to me that a, say, .800 OPS needs some positional context to make sense.
I think we've by now established the faultiness of the, "but he pitched in the AL East!" argument.
See for reference, Danys Baez.
It was meant to show how bad Francouer has been.
Still, time to get Gio up.
Still, a 4+ ERA in the NL West is pretty bad.
MMMKay.
Wasnt he banned like 2 or three times last year?
So he was lucky for half a season? WOW!!
Here comes Drew with the bases empty and 2 outs. AND HR!!! I'm sawwy JD!!
(My only complaint is it didn't come when they had one of those guys on base in the previous inning, but, hey, I'll take it.)
I called it!
Really...
he has too keep this pase up though.
Woo hoo!
This really could be 4-2 but... (no, I keed, I keed, I'll take it!)
Furcal, however, with his career .755 OPS (through 2004) is 0.050 over his position average.
And Betamint gum goes 2 fer 2.
I also thought of something that I'd like to share - plastic makes for bete-mit than cardboard...
exactly. let's see
why is Lofton still in there!! I swear man!!!
No hole in SE, btw - I had in mind the Francoeur started in 2004.
From June 15 through yesterday, he batted 327/391/457/848. That's 162 ABs over 39 games (38 starts). Of his 53 hits, 13 were doubles.
Meaninglessness descends...
And there being two outs.
Thanks. So, .702 OPS is average for SS, and .799 for RF. Does the average OPS by position line up lock step with Bill James' defensive spectrum? (Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the order of decreasing defensive difficulty was SS, 2B, CF, 3B, LF, RF, 1B).
BJ's defensive spectrum is currently: C, SS, 2B, 3B, CF, RF, LF, 1B.
true, the first batter ropped it to right.
That strike was a stretch on Furcal!
Furc hit it on the nose--I can't fairly blame that DP on him, only note the importance of D.
I don't know the official ranking, but I would think that RF comes before LF due to the position requiring a stronger arm.
"The best fastball we've seen in a while was just thrown by Kenny Lofton."
Hah. I love Vin Scully. "Carrara's warming up in the pen, because the best fastball we've seen in awhile was just thrown by Kenny Lofton." God bless him.
"The best fastball we've seen in a while was just thrown by Kenny Lofton."*
Ouch.
And bunt single. . .
A hit would have worked wonders.
My couch use to make us run 3 times around the park for bonehead plays like that. (Sandy Koufax league)
But Hall just nailed Soriano at 2nd. Woo.
put it this way, my brain wasn't thinking good thoughts about Lofton.
I mean coach, sorry.
I'd go a bit more fairy tale and combine "Jack and the Beanstalk" with "The Wizard of Oz."
Instead of a movie, I'll travel from village to village as an oral traditionist, singing my mournful tale.
well atleast I made you chuckle.
the thing is I type quick but can't spell wirth a nickle.
Not.
Deja vu inning continues.
Right after we trade LaRoche and Kuo for Maddux.
sweet.
it's true right??
Now, if we could just get a few of them with guys on base.
This is Izzy's fault. If he had not stranded those runners the Dodgers have a comfortable lead and Cruz would not be able to continue mascarading as a baseball player.
In psychiatry, they call this "co-dependence"
Sounds like something out of an Anne Rice novel.
Don't we have 4 leadoff doubles resulting in 4 goose eggs?
Feliz gets on, Alou sacrifices with Linden batting. Then the "by the book" duo each do L/R exchanges, first Alou swaps Sweeney for Alfonzo, then Tracy swaps Marte for Torres, the Alou swaps Greene for Sweeney - each move making things worse for the guy making the move. Since Tracy couldn't change out Marte - he was "stuck" getting the better end of the deal and Greene struck out...
calling a bunt wouldn't have hurt us.
There are few ex-Dodgers I hate as much as Ward.
Now, in teh bottom of the 10th, Wilson gets a single and Tracy wastes an out sacrificing him to "scoring posstion." This, in turn, allowed Alou to walk Randa and pitch to Hernandez instead.
The checkers match continues up north ...
good for us, now let's win.
happy
With Loney on 2nd, playing for 1 run, but with 1 out - sacrificeing still won't work. If Loney can get to thrid and there is still one out then that can work.
Once again I am stupified by the logic of this lineup as Iz and Hall are joined together.
Martin should PH for Hall.
A couple doubles off of Paul Bunyan, not bad.
I thought Betemint gum was pretty funny. But I'm easily amused.
Still here, still hatin'.
I heard Wilson has a BET-E-MIT than Aybar.
somebody in dodgers.com said it (got to give him props for it)
Those of us who don't care for izturis for example have a legitimate reason.
Plus the whole hating thing reminds me of dodgers.com, something i'd rather forget.
Oh, was that you, underdog? I'm not surprised. It amazes me sometimes how much you and I think alike.
If I were you, I'd be scared.
(Well, not really.)
Yeah, did I mention this ump' strike zone is minute?
yeah, some players can't do that, you had to see the thing live to appreciated.
At any rate. I'll take a sweep, thankyouverymuch. If we can win 4 of 6 on the road I'll be happy.
In any event, it's not really a point worth arguing. Pals? Pals.
I really think the Dodgers, when healthy, have enough players to make it competitive this season without giving up any other players. But we'll see....
--
hey, why is Penny going Wednesday now, while Sele is matched up against Bronson Arroyo on Tuesday? Why did they swap?
And maybe have them throw in Gigantor.
So I'll be the first to ask it (and will keep asking until we are hopefully back in first)... is the season still over and are we still "out of it". Or does three games out of the 60 that are left change anything?
But, the Dodgers are NOT close enough, nowhere near, to where trading the farm for big-ticket help would make a significant difference.
So, any trades made should be small, unless you are ab-so-lute-ly hosing the other GM. In the meantime, hope the vets get healthy and the kids stay hot.
I wouldn't mind JtD going out.
he's still an injury risk.IMP.
The longer JtD puts up indifferent numbers in Las Vegas, his stock has nowhere to go but down.
has he ever played a full season?
Well then, that would make his current stock high then, wouldn't it? Relatively speaking, of course
He needs to come to the plate with "Gold Digger" blasting over the house speakers.
dose he have a good aditude? dose he explode when things don't go right for him?
What are you getting at?
Miltie and reg mentioned that Bradley is hitting well recently. I looked up the numbers and posted them. That's all.
I'm sorry I just don't like "#'s" only there's a human alament to everything.JMO. I didn't mean anything by it.
I'd rather wait on JtD than trade him for Soriano, but Guzman needs to show me something - and soon. For such a hyped prospect, I've seen nothing to make me say, "Wow." And we're running out of time to keep leaning on the "He's young for his league" argument.
I could see a dynasty coming that would give time to scrounge up a pair like Koufax and Drysdale. But I know I'm dreaming as Jimi would say!
like I said I don't mean anything by it (oberservation that's all)
22.8% in AAA, 28.9% in AA, although his patience is down as well: .55 ISO patience in AAA, 64% in AA. I think he needs more time, and we don't need Soriano.
564 Just so. Broxton either lucks out and becomes an instant closer, or is a middle reliever. Watching his mistakes, he could benefit so much from a bit of experience. I think he might have wonderful stuff.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.