Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Didn't the Dodgers have good chemistry when the season began? I thought that's what we were told, but apparently not.
From Tony Jackson of the Daily News:
The Dodgers brought a six-game winning streak into their series with Florida, during which the bullpen had combined to allow just two runs over 19 innings.
The surge coincides with a series of roster moves in which the club acquired (Elmer) Dessens, activated Brett Tomko from the disabled list and traded (Odalis) Perez and Danys Baez.
"I think it's the result of the personnel changes as much as anything," Dodgers bullpen coach Dan Warthen said. "The guys are getting more comfortable with each other. Early in the year, nobody spoke. There were just a lot of very quiet individuals."
There was that big long winning streak in May, but that's ancient history.
I'm sure Warthen meant well. People can't resist trying explain winning with chemistry, even though it's so much more likely that winning results from more individuals having decent-to-productive days at once.
If chemistry explains the success of the Dodgers, who are trying today to achieve the perversely impressive feat of following an eight-game losing streak with an eight-game winning streak, then they are probably way too combustible.
First he hits a homer, now he's making sense. If only he could catch.
No, I know what you mean; the guy can't catch deep fly balls.
Baez (2005 club Devil Rays)
Carter (2005 club Devil Rays)
Hamulack (2005 club Mets)
Kuo (2005 club Farm system, Dodgers)
Osoria (2005 club Farm system, Dodgers)
Brazoban (2005 club Dodgers
Gagne (2005 club Dodgers, injured)
You had a group of pitchers who had just come together at the beginning of the year and then two days into the season, Gagne goes out and they bring another free agent in Saito.
So you either had young guys who aren't going to talk too much anyways and then a couple of guys from different teams.
I think now with vets like Dessens, Carrera and Tomko, plus now Broxton, Beimel and Saito have been up for a while now so they should be more at ease now.
I think Tony Jackson may be trying to read too much into that statement, I would think after 3 months or so, things would be more lively plus a 7 game winning streak is always going to help.
I even saw Jeff Kent crack a smile a couple of days ago!
Oh, and thank you, Florida Marlins, for scheduling today's game at 6 p.m. so nobody can watch it.
The three shortstops all speak to each other in Spanish. Martin and Gagne can converse in French. Penny and Maddux can speak to each other in the other kind of French (profanity). And Ethier and Saito were having a clubhouse conversation in Japanese the other day.
AP Wire: Dodger second baseman Jeff Kent placed on 15-day DL with strained jaw muscle.
The game is slated to be on KCAL, so I guess that isn't affected.
I also believe that there are six people who understand the MLB blackout rules completely as they pertain to EI, MLB.tv, and local broadcasts.
Each person lives in a separate part of the country, so none of them can be taken out simultaneously with a terrorist attack.
Also, each of these six people are trying to find people who are pure of mind and heart and are willing subjects to learn the rules.
Some people feel they must be stopped. A self-flagellating albino monk is going around trying to kill these people one by one.
1. Gagne
2. Brazoban
3. Kuo
4. Osoria
5. Baez
6. Carter
7. Hammy/Wunsch
.....and possibly Saito, who we all know has turned to gold.
I'm sure Neddie felt there were cheaper alternatives than Elmer at the time.
Neddie has an uncanny abilty to adjust. He's not a GM that says, "OK I brought this guy in I'm sticking with him, do or die."
Neddie looks out for the best interests of the team. He didn't hesitate to DFA Carter and Hammy, or trade Seo and Baez. He adjusted. When a sucker fell upon Odalis he was able to bring back Elmer who has contributed tenfold early for the blue.
Lowe and his buddies converse in American.
As far as Baez goes, like I've said before, if he pitches exactly as he did in '03, '04, '05, the trade works out exceptionally. For whatever reason, he pitched much worse than the previous 3 seasons. Of course I'm kind of curious to how the Baez bashers would have felt if we signed Todd Jones to be our potential closer with Gagne's health issues. I suspect the Jones hate would have equalled the Baez hate.
Most of you have worked with other people at some point in your lives. The personalities of the people you work with affect how well you do your job. Maybe that factor shouldn't be a factor. We're all programmed to do our best, so we do our best and nothing will interfere with the pure signal of our talent.
But my life experience tells me otherwise.
When "Vic the Brick" and his ilk talk about chemistry, they're obviously full of crap. But when a player himself mentions it, I don't automatically discount it. Human motivation is subtle and tricky to measure, but happiness in the workplace does have some impact.
So while it's true that happiness in the work place unmistakably affects job performance, I think for baseball players, winning or losing has a much greater effect on happiness in the workplace than does the personality of their teammates.
Yahoo had the game being televised on Prime, but I'm happy to see that its on KCAL. I can pick up KCAL with my antenna from north San Diego, so I will be able to watch some of the game (my son's 6th b-day party - a bowling party - will probably keep me from seeing Billz, but maybe I can catch Broxton-Saito).
KCAL has today, Sunday, Tuesday
Big Fox next Saturday
ESPN next Sunday
Yeah, that guy.
Ultimately, I think in November, only Kuo and Brazoban will be left on the 40 man roster from this season's original bullpen.
Maybe, but from now on, lets not trade good players/ good prospects for relievers. I'm sorry, I don't wanna be run like the Reds, and see Ethier and Martin for the National's bullpen.
Let me throw some numbers out for you in regards to Mr. Baez.
Batting average against.
'03 - .229
'04 - .237
'05 - .244
'06 - .283 (as a Dodger)
OPS against
'03 - .673
'04 - .685
'05 - .674
'06 - .735 (as a Dodger)
not only that, Baez has a career .243 BAA. And I refuse to believe over the course of his career he has been LUCKY to post that .243 BAA against.
These are facts I believe many posters turn their backs on and ignore.
Steve Schmoll, Edwin Jackson, and Chuck Tiffany. LOL...
& throw
that's a known fact can't argue there.
It's been an ongoing process...
I don't think I'm ready for competition.
G. Maddux, after coming to the Dodgers and losing his shot at the no-no due to weather, talks about doing what gives the team its best chance to win, is quoted in part saying "it's not about me."
O. Perez, after being traded by the Dodgers, says KC is a bad team, but there he can be "the ace, or at least one of the good guys." Makes it clear he thinks it IS all about him, as if there had been any lingering doubt.
One is going to the Hall of Fame. The other has gone to the Kansas City Royals.
Can you imagine what O. Perez would have said or done in G. Maddux's situation--however unlikely that might be? I cringe at the thought...
Your team chemistry will be much better, more conducive to winning when it's made up more of folks who see things like Maddux, than of those who see things like he-who-should-not-be-named-here-again-by-me.
Unfortunately, Maddux's outlook isn't shared by enough people in all walks of life, not just in sports.
Edwin Jackson 22 years old in AAA, 2-7 record, 64 IP, 78 hits, 55K/32BB ratio, 2006 MLB stats 24.2 IP, 31 hits, 18K/17BB ratio.
Chuck Tiffany, injured since April, while in AA, 21 years old, 15.2 IP, 20 hits, 12K/14BB ratio.
Now, could one of these guys turn it around, sure but not this year, maybe not next year either.
Now, I think this argument is more about philosophy than results but at some point in a player's development you have to decide if you think he has some future in your organization and if he doesn't, what can of value does he have, Edwin Jackson's value was higher in 2003-2004 than it was in 2005, today, I am not sure what value he has languishing in bullpen for the Devil Rays (aside from the question of he can't start for the Rays, what does that say.)
37 I think you also have to look at the player's experience, the league is playing in and the depth of the system. While numbers are important, you have to look at the league and see is it a hitter's league or a pitcher's league.
But you can't have it both ways. Either he is a genius with the Midas touch, or he makes mistakes that need correcting. You can't cite the ones that worked out (Saito, Ethier) and also cite the cancelled failures that didn't work out (Baez, Seo, Hamulack, Carter, Tomko) at the same time.
Methinks the wisest path is just to eschew superlatives. He's been lucky (Saito), unlucky (Baez), smart (Ethier), dumb (Carter) and we-don't-know yet (Betemit for Aybar, Guzman for Lugo, Perez for Dessens, Furcal, Lofton, Maddux for Izturis, etc.).
One thing we can certainly agree on is that he's active. Not sure if that's a good thing or a bad thing (except that he keeps throwing in more and more money), but there it is.
As for the question of prospects, as far as we can tell right now (which ain't real far) the only top prospect he's used has been Guzman. But instead of thinking of prospects as either future All-stars or future busts, just think of them as assets. They're like money, only with feelings. Just as it's worthwhile to ask if he's spending money wisely (e.g., Furcal's contract) it's fair to ask if he's spending prospects wisely (e.g., only Lugo for Guzman and Pedroza)?
The answers aren't obvious, but the questions are absolutely fair.
I like how you fail to mention his other stats.
ERA's over that time:
2003: 3.81
2004: 3.57
2005: 2.86
Whip
2003: 1.16
2004: 1.31
2005: 1.33
Let's not forget that his K/BB ratio isn't all that great and he doesn't strike a ton of guys out.
Bluetahoe, face it, the Baez trade was an awful, AWFUL trade. Just admit it already.
48. My view of the Baez thing moves in the direction of Steve's: even if Baez had been every bit as "good" in 2006 as in the past few years, it still would have constituted a bad trade (money wasted, minor league assets wasted). Didn't like it then, still don't like it.
And, apropos of nothing, I don't like the practice of updating trades in the "it was essentially Tiffany, Jackson, and Aybar for Betemit and Carter" way. Because we can't erase the production of Aybar, Baez, and Carter while they were all here. We don't get back all those bad innings or JAWFAs or, to be fair, Aybar errors. It's only meaningful to assess one trade at a time for its marginal impact on the present and future of the organization.
My wife and I are now officially telling folks that we will have an addition to our family (our third such expansion project) in March.
Also... I just ran into a former student while picking up the dry cleaning. This was cool for me because I've only been teaching one year. Anywho, she's majoring in Chemistry so I think I'll have her send a resume to the Dodgers. (bada bing!)
Thanks, I'm here all week.
53 Has a chemistry teacher ever said, "We've got good baseball"?
Sure. Ray Milland in "It Happens Every Spring."
"Is it true that they traded away Little Cesar?"
"Yup."
"Who'd they get for him?"
"Greg Maddux."
"Oh, wow."
"Yeah, it would be 'oh wow," if he weren't 40 yrs old and not so great any more."
"Oh. Well, did the Dodgers need an old pitcher?"
[laughing]
"You're going to share that with your blog buddies, aren't you?!"
"Um...er...no. I wouldn't do that..."
Bill Bray in to close it out.
But 57 said it best. I laughed so loud I looked ridiculous. And a man in my position can't afford to be made to look ridiculous.
2. Congrats Terry! My group of parent/friends views those who go for three as hearty pioneers who could cross the prarie in a covered wagon.
3. GoBears, please don't take this the wrong way, but I'm surprised you used the phrase "apropros of nothing." That phrase has always struck me as (i) wasteful filler and (ii) generally not accurate, since something tends to have prompted the comment, both qualities I view you as strongly disliking.
Oh, and Tim Salmon just hit HR #297 -- he may get to 300 yet!
The announcer said they must be "underachievers that have had a lot of liquor."
Really , that's what he said.
We also tend to use "chemistry" in its metaphorical sense to describe relationships between people, as in "our lab has good chemistry" etc. with some degree of irony. As I am getting married in two weeks to another chemist, I anticipate hearing this next line quite a bit at the reception.
The one significant difference is that chemists tend to use baseball metaphors less in a sexual context (e.g. "I got to second base last night") than most people. I don't think I need to elaborate here, as you can probably imagine why this might be true.
Thanks for asking.
And on September 1, he will say, "We were waiting for this?"
even when I'm liquired up I don't do the wave.(wow he said that)
This now brings the total of people I've interacted with who are synthetic organic chemists to two.
My sister-in-law is one.
And it's also just not a nice thing to say about people you don't know.
But just for that, Sam, I'm gonna have another Marty burger for lunch today. I'll see if I can get a double patty this time!
And I won't get into the whole chili-cheese-fry issue.
it also has alot to do how everything unfoiled.... I don't know Golf but I'm willing to give him the benefit out the doubt.
If you want a chemist's perspective, I think Derek Lowe would be a better person to ask:
http://pipeline.corante.com/archives/2006/08/01/testosterone_carbon_isotopes_and_floyd_landis.php
PS Couldn't resist the irony.
22 - The personalities I work with definitely affect how I do my job. However, as far as the success or failure of my team or department or staff goes, that predominantly depends on talent. Personality is just a small factor, and it partly can be measured through performance, anyway.
3- Bluetahoe, I'm still worried that you're deliberately trying to bait people - for example with today's use of the word genius - in bold - to describe Colletti. It's one thing to like him, but you seem almost determined to provoke extreme reactions. Am I wrong?
For thoes who didn't click though, an excerpt:
you can also get C-11 if you have access to a particle accelerator
Chemistry geek humor.
it's all in the eyes of the beholder (but I see you're point) I like Rex he's my kind of guy.
Funny I hadn't made the connection to the Dodgers' pitcher by the same name.
sorry, my brian likes how he does his commenting.
Just got back. Now THIS is quality. Dee-lish.
In addition to my disbelief that people will keep paying to see rehashed "superhero" movies, I also can't believe that people keep paying to see old TV shows rehashed into movies.
Rex is second only to McCarver as the worst commentator I've ever heard.
Who was the pitcher when a batter said a pitch sounded fast? I think this was years back.
Thanks
As a film nut, I can't believe that people pay to see 99% of the stuff that comes out.
That's been attributed to a lot of hitters and several pitchers, including Walter Johnson, Bob Feller, and Nolan Ryan.
The film's very brooding, rather dark, rather minimalist, with not a lot of exposition or character development -- you're left to figure things out. It's actually a very languid movie, with jolts of sporatic (and fairly graphic) violence, but it's light on the overall action. Really, it's closer to a mood piece than anything else.
If you've liked Mann's other movies (HEAT, COLLATERAL, etc) I suspect you'll like VICE, or at least find parts of it interesting and/or worthwhile. It didn't really work for me -- but it's worth checking out if you're a fan of the director or the genre.
After the game on DT there was talk about a "shuto" (best be careful spelling that). Was it the pitch Saito ended the game with?
And it's a blend of a sinker and screwball? Or?
Actually, I'm a synthetic organic chemist, too, and I did use baseball metaphors when I taught organic (mostly when discussing mnemonics for R and S stereochemistry).
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.