Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Dodger first baseman James Loney is trying to follow Angels infielder Howie Kendrick's example in taking advantage of his second shot at the big leagues.
Despite going 5 for 22 in his past five games, the 23-year-old Kendrick has a 1.035 OPS since his return to the Angels lineup June 26. Kendrick is batting .403 in that stretch, though he has only two walks in 64 plate appearances.
More recently, since his late-July callup, Loney is 7 for 19 with five extra-base hits, three walks, one strikeout, a .455 on-base percentage and a .737 slugging percentage (1.182 OPS). A diving catch robbed Loney of another extra-base hit in his final at-bat Saturday.
It's just a small stretch of games, and Loney could still find himself back in Las Vegas for few weeks with Jeff Kent and Nomar Garciaparra scheduled to return from the disabled list this week, but he's making it a tough decision.
* * *
I was just looking at the Gameday drawing of Dolphin stadium. It confirms what I thought I saw yesterday. It's a big park. You really have to lay into one to hit it out in left center.
Raffy Furcal's 12-gamer is tied for third-longest with Mark Kotsay and Craig Monroe.
Radar currently shows v. scattered showers, with the barest hint of some heavier stuff. But this is Florida, so wait a couple of hours.
http://tinyurl.com/e6kj2
Just noting that Ethier hit 2 balls on Friday night that would have been homers had they been hit the previous night.
Jogging George!
(Yes, I'm still bitter. I've never seen a no-hitter in person.)
This year, at least.
Remember Billingsley's quotes about feeling comfortable in his debut because he was caught by Martin, who's been his catcher for 3 years? I don't see why the same wouldn't apply to Hall and Hendrickson.
faith runs rampid in my brain.
some dude that came from the D-Rays/our sunday catcher.
some dude that came from the D-Rays/our sunday catcher.
Let Steve do it. He and Charlie are good buddies.
If that had happened, I would have started camping out for playoff tickets.
As it is, I won't.
I think he struck out the side no?
George Burns, Giants, 1914
Shano Collins, White Sox, 1918
Elmer Valo, A's, 1949
Jackie Jensen, Red Sox, 1958
Ted Sizemore, Dodgers, 1969
Manny Sanguillen, Pirates, 1971
Alfredo Griffin, Dodgers, 1988
The last player to hit two bases loaded triples in the same game was, of course, Duane Kuiper.
Always.
Double you're thought
Repko- 3-20 since coming off the DL.
I think this is why Ned let Choi walk. 1) He knew Choi wasn't that good and 2) there was no reason to put him in AAA because Choi would have only impeeded the progress of Loney.
I think some have been critical for letting Choi go for nothing and I think those criticisms are unfounded.
Problem is he's only gotten 44ABs against them this year.
Cody Ross hit it 430 feet for an out.
The Dodgers went 65-88 that season.
The L.A. record for losses in a season is 18 by Claude Osteen in 1968 and Bill Singer in 1969.
In 1910, George Bell set the modern era (60'6" distance) record for losses in a season by a Dodger when he went 10-27 with a 2.64 ERA.
Didnt Alan Trammell do that with Maroth or Bonderman a couple seasons ago?
This doesn't seem to unusual because as I looked back, I saw quite a few players who lost 19 games.
Maroth lost 21 games in 2003.
the suicide squeeze is a great play when you're at the stadium.(pumps me up)
So, then it's still not "perfectly" executed.
It's just one of those lazy cliches that announcers use. Sort of like wild pitches being "uncorked."
Doesn't anyone ever just "throw" a wild pitch?
His career record is 37-44
Olsteen in 68 and Singer in 69 were far better pitchers they were just on really bad teams especially 68 for Olsteen. I believe Steve Carlton lost 19 and when Bonderman lost 19, everyone knew he had great stuff and his loses were due to his youth and and lack of control and a bad Tiger team.
Singer made up for it by having several losing seasons.
With different teams to boot.
It's Mark Eaton.
It's even stranger when I encounter a woman who is taller than me. I have to try very hard not to stare.
Who do you want for him?
Should've known better with this crowd...
Since he's getting OJT, I don't fault him.
Since he's getting OJT, I don't fault him.
My dad was classmates with Angels scouting director Eddie Bane.
I think.
There's a female librarian who fills in at work who insists she is just 6'2" and I think she is my height (6'5"). I suppose she thinks 6'5" just sounds too strange for a woman.
Does anyone like preseason NFL games? Do people go on summer vacations to visit NFL training camps like they do with baseball spring training?
Thanks for giving me a weird image to have in my mind every time I meet this woman from now on.
Hendy's not particulary fun to watch. He seems like a 4.50 ERA kind of guy who would consistently go 12-12 with average run support.
Yet, weren't you saying this trade was "gold" at the time?
Watching Hendrickson is just depressing. DFA him or trade him or do whatever...addition by subtraction.
You know what they say about librarians. Female ones, anyway.
You mean that they're pretty much just like everybody else?
Last year he went 11-8 and his ERA was 5.90.
Probably, but the rumors are fun. I'm dating one, so I get the inside story.
Yet, despite run support, he still hasn't pitched well enough to win regardless.
He's simply not a good pitcher.
Hey, it's your funeral, pal!
Be careful because librarians will take their birth control pills and put them in alphabetical order instead of numerical order.
Girardi let him bat, in order to pitch him 1 more inning. We'll see if it works.
Or Dewey Decimal, which is worse.
2. When Kent is activated, I'd DFA Ledee.
3. When Nomar is activated, I'd demote Beimel or Cararra (I would say Martinez, but he's been great for us all year and deserves to stay).
4. Loney should stay.
5. What to do with Nomar next year? He has to give us a huge hometown discount or there is no way, and I believe there IS NO WAY he'll sign for a deep discount!
Judging from Olsen's pitch count, I think it probably is.
I remember a character from the movie "Talent for the Game" throwing out Eddie Bane's name in a list of can't-miss-pitching-prospects-who-didn't-pan-out.
I'm more surprised you were able to stay awake through that movie.
Its Jim Tracy 101.
And now it's Saenz against a LHP.
Thats just asking for trouble.
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B10170NYA1998.htm
Mark Langston may disagree with you.
the ump must be from SoCal, woo!! Betemit!
Seriously. If the situation were reversed my TV would be in pieces right now. I'm not joking.
TOBESTER
It's funny too. Hendy's 'decent' start all of a sudden looks 'very good'.
The ball hit the target, but the target looked up and in to me.
I guarantee you've never seen that pitch called a strike on Barry Bonds.
You dont bat a guy in one inning, just so he can pitch at the most 1 additional innning when he's got a high pitch counts. Thats just bad baseball, and he rightfully got burned. Bringing in a lefty with Saenz on deck and the bases full?
This game is on Girardi's head.
Cool. I like the way we match up against the Redbirds...
A cartoon Jim Mora? Why?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwq7BYOnDrM
Classic
it does?
Its possible the Dodgers could win 19 games in a row. The upcoming homestand is 10 games vs the Rockies, Giants, and Marlins.
you kind of can't blame them, but in my case I'm very happy with the call.
Like I said, I don't think it was the worst call ever.
Like I said yesterday. Brett's our good luck charm. All we do is WIN with him on the 25 man roster.
Better to be lucky than good
If he was going to get an off day, dont put him in the field after the team is up by 4 runs.
If this wasnt an off day, then they should have played him from the start.
yeah, no thanks to Hendrickson.
9-0 since removing Baez.
It's absolutely true. He didn't pitch well today and still has not pitched well for us since he came over.
He lucked out that we scored 7 runs.
Sort of like Casual Fridays?
Without Bretty on the roster we are team about 12-15 below .500.
Oh my. Tomko time. You better be up JBrox.
OR
237. bluetahoe
Bretty likey the bullpen.
Like I said yesterday. Brett's our good luck charm. All we do is WIN with him on the 25 man roster.
So which is it Tahoe? Does Tomko suck or not? Talking out of both sides. No?
http://tinyurl.com/eknzz
DFA'ing Cruz instead of Ledee just seems too strange. Is Ledee's value as a pinch hitter that important?
Seriously though, what else are we supposed to expect from our 5th starter?
Hmmm...guess winning changes things?
But if you only follow a team when they are winning, what kind of fan does that make you?
"strange" is kind
What else do we expect?
how about a guy where his BEST start isn't giving up three runs in six innings?
That's actually about as good as Hendrickson is ever going to do...it's really depressing seeing him penciled in and knowing we've gotta score about 7 or 8 runs to win the game when he pitches.
The problem is the team has 4 #5 starters (Maddux, Hendrickson, Sele, Billingsley).
he toped out at 96 MPH.
5(1)
6(5)
6 2/3(1)
5 1/3(5)
6(4)
6(3)
6(3)
Looks like a pretty good 5th starter to me. Not spectacular, but definitely keeping his team in the game every time he's out there and doesn't tax the bullpen too much with short outings.
That does not justify pitching him during the ENTIRE regular season.
Probably about middle-of-the-pack for a fifth starter.
The Marlins have almost always been the Expos.
And during that time period it wouldn't surprise me if Hendy's ERA and total IP's is better than both Lowe and Penny's.
I agree. Just change "most times" to "twice".
re: Eaton getting tossed today in the first v angels?
I can't see the prehensile tail anymore.
I don't know
Throwing behind a batter is considered throwing AT him, since most batters back up. Throwing behind his head is particuarly bad form. Did Eaton do that?
This team is just too streaky to really feel confident. Its difficult to just enjoy, bc you just know the team is capable of losing a bunch in a row also.
Its hard to suspend rational thought and just enjoy a streak, given the Dodgers' last 18 seasons. I think its really jaded some.
Maybe if the team recaptures 1st place, then the confidence will return.
Unfortunately, his pitching is the epitome of replacement level
Why do I set myself up for a 5 run comeback win? Why do I do it? I'll never learn.
294 The ball was at lower back level, perhaps a bit above the belt. Seemed totally harmless.
He's definately been the shiniest golden nugget Ned found on his archaeological excavations.
Should not the goal be to have #3 and above guys filling out each spot?
And that was one tough lefty for a while.
Top 1ST B:1 S:2 O:0
Alfonso Soriano homers (35) on a fly ball to left field.
Another thought: This offense is good enough to win games when the pitching gives up 4 or less runs, maybe even 5 or less, its all about pitching, pitching, pitching, pitching, pitching.
When we were losing games left and right, we not only didn't have good pitching going on but we also had several slappy hitters in the lineup at the same time, including lofton, izturis, martinez, and at the time furcal was being a slappy.
Right, and i'm glad he didn't.
But i was talking about landing top tier starting pitching from free agency, something the dodgers haven't done in a long time.
Talent in baseball is exponential in my opinion, meaning that #2/#3 are way way way way better than #5/#6. But that the further you go down the talent chain, the less meaningful drop off you have.
There's a much more meaningful difference between a pitcher with a 2.00ERA and a 4.00 ERA, than say the difference between a pitcher with a 5.00ERA and a 7.00ERA.
In a year or two, though, the Dodgers may be closer to that when they have more of the kids come up to pitch (Elbert, later Kershaw, maybe Kuo, etc), but even then, we should probably enjoy it while it lasts because affording five of them for a long time is going to be hard. I'm just saying I think you need to look at it a little differently.
Meanwhile, 9 in a row! (6 on the road!) I'll take that, thankyouverymuch.
However, he's taken to the role well. I can't really think of any starter in Japan who has come over as a reliever and done well.
Sasaki was already a reliever when he came over.
Shigetoshi Hasegawa was an adequate reliever.
Better him than Lofton, Mueller, Tomko.
The sudden deployment of Martinez in the outfield Sunday fueled speculation that the Dodgers might deal him to a club interested in seeing how he handles the outfield.
That is why looking back on who we should or should not sign is difficult.
So you must be mad at Papelbon for giving up a game-tying homer to Navarro.
I like that name
I still think Sele will make spot starts, he seemed to burn out last year after starting all season long, so I'm thinking this demotion is agood thing for his stamina.
Actually, my real dream is for a subway series in LA. Public transportation uber alles.
can you imagine that mess.wow!.
http://tinyurl.com/kav8o
In fairness, the Dodgers have kids run out with the players every game and I have to think that gets old.
Unless of course, you're the kid, then it's a lot of fun.
Teams need to make the kids feel like they are part of the game with events like the PA announcing and the running out on the field. It's better than having to do things like building a Ferris wheel like they did in Detroit.
Seems like he was discussed around here some time ago, I'd at least consider it. If he is good enough for Sadaharu Oh, he's good enough for me.
There's a very simple reason for this, top tier pitchers don't become free agents. Let's look at the top 20 pitchers in VORP this season:
13 of those 20 pitchers were drafted/signed by their current team, or traded for as a prospect. None of them have become eligible for free agency.
2 more were acquired through trade after they were somewhat establisehed, neither have been free agents (Schilling and Penny).
1 was signed as a "established" free agent out of Cuba. He has never been a free agent since establishing himself in the MLB (Contreras).
1 was an injury risk that was signed to a low risk deal ($500K + incentives), but was not expected to be an ace (Carpenter).
That leaves 3 guys who signed big deals with their current teams through free agency: Mussina, Schmidt, and Smoltz. They were signed in 2000, 2001, and 2001 respectively. That means no top tier pitcher has signed as a free agent in the last 4 years (unless you want to include Carpenter, and Pedro, who missed out on the top 20 VORP thing).
Of the 21-30 in VORP, none have reached free agency. 31-40 has several free agents, but most of them are relievers (Pedro and Glavine are in this group).
Matsuzaka would be only be available if Seibu decides to post him I believe. Teams would have to submit sealed bids just to get the right to negotiate with him.
I somehow doubt the Dodgers will get involved in the bidding. I think it will be a duel between the Mariners and Yankees.
The Twins drew 14 walks yesterday, but only 2 today.
Great post KOTH, some posters seem to think these great pitchers just fall off of trees.
Whenever Bowden gets to big a head he should be forced to watch the Angels and Juan Rivera. Whenever Stoneman gets dissed for not making the big trade the detractors should be forced to watch Juan Rivera and all the kids he has kept in the stable.
Love the Angel move of Kendrick to 1st base like the Brooklyn Dodgers did with Jackie Robinson in his 1st year when 2nd base was blocked in his inaugural year. How bizarre to be married to a 1st baseman who was all defense and no hit and then do a 180 and put someone at 1st who is all hit and no defense. Scoscia continues to confound me as you just can't pigeonhole him.
Elbert continues to strike out batters, and his control is improving, but he's starting to give up a lot of homers. He gave up 4 in 78 IP at Vero, and 7 in only 35 IP at Jacksonville. Hopefully he can improve upon that. Also, Dewitt had a rough Jacksonville debut, striking out twice and failing to get the ball out of the infield the other 3 tries.
5.0IP 9hits 5ER 2BB 1K 1HR
He currently has 284, so he would need 219 plate appearances over the next 51 games to qualify. That's an average of 4.3 per game.
Not impossible, but not easy either.
Nah, never mind.
You are correct. Tony Gwynn qualified for a batting title in this fashion toward the end of his career.
In 1996, Gwynn batted .353. He had only 498 PAs, 4 short of what was necessary. But the next closest person to him in batting average was Ellis Burks at .344, so he had a lot of space.
Lofton has hit just 8 doubles.
Or maybe Ralph Garr in 1974.
Or maybe Debs Garms in 1940.
I didn't remember any of those NL batting champs! (Well, I remember Terry, but not his batting title)
That gave the dubious distinction of being the least remembered batting champ AND the least remembered MVP in the same year.
Pendleton barely beat out Barry Bonds for the MVP.
I believe, as the poet once said, Bonds had the last laugh.
Then again, Gibby's MVP season wasn't all that impressive statistically either.
I think it pretty much is impossible. Even playing full time, he would still come up some 25 plate appearances short. I posted about it last night:
https://dodgerthoughts.baseballtoaster.com/comments/post.html#270
"Ethier needs to average 4.29 plate appearaces per Dodger game from now through the end of the season to qualify for the NL batting title.
Since his callup he has averaged 3.36 PAs per team game. Since becoming a regular on June 30, it's 3.81.
Sorry, Andre, looks like no soup for you."
And is usually a school not good in any sport.
Interesting that Two of the least memorable batting champs were on the Braves.
& of course everybody knows he was with the Braves that year.
374 - Oh but Bob, the sportswriters that vote on the HOF class of 2014 will have the last last laugh, voting McGwire in but not Bonds!
Sen. Mitchell might argue that the laugh cycle is not yet over.
Man, he was a hacker.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/h/hackeri01.shtml
Depends upon which nickname you want to use.
To put things in perspective, Garr likely never made as much as $100,000 per year. My, how things have changed.
I would assume that the only teammate of Garr's who made over $100,000 was Henry Aaron.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=lukas/060803
Just because we can.
Finally we figured out a way for Cesar Izturis to win a batting title!
http://www.athleticsnation.com/story/2005/12/4/34515/9698
Everybody gets a gold watch as a prize for being named "Biggest Winner at Trading Deadline" by Buster Olney.
I, too, have fallen prey to the "failed attempt to emboldenate part of a word."
I am afraid top level free agent pitching is a fools game. The money and time given the best hitters I find preposterous, but this is partly old fashioned thrift. A golden arm is even more ephemeral. A pitcher is more than likely to ruin his arm in a period like 5 or six years.
Although you can argue that the D's have evaluated poorly on contracts like Kevin Brown, Darren Driefort, and Perez, I would say that even the best research and thinking can't justify 10mil for six years for a pitcher. Only the very lucky will survive. As much as a hate it, offense is probably a better investment. On the other hand, if you are blessed with young pitching, defense may be a good investment, as it is currently probably under-rated.
"The individual batting champion or slugging champion shall be the player with the highest batting average or slugging percentage, provided he is credited with as many or more total appearances at the plate in League Championship games as the number of games scheduled for each club in his league that season, multiplied by 3.1 in the case of a major league player."
The only time this came into play though was in 1981 when Bill Madlock qualified with 320 PAs during the strike interrupted season. Pittsburgh played 102 games, although some played more. (The Giants played 111). So if you went by the highest number of games played (111), Madlock would not have made it. However, since the Pirates had just 102 opportunities to play, Madlock made it with four PAs to spare.
The problem with the acquisitions of Dave Goltz and Don Stanhouse is that they weren't very good pitchers to begin with.
I believe you are looking for Don Stanhouse. Please don't blame me if this causes nightmares.
And at MotherBoy.
According to the rule as written, there were no eligible players for the batting title in either 1981 or 1994.
The games that were wiped out were no longer considered "scheduled", it's like they never existed.
But a rainout that isn't made up is a different animal.
Don't you read all those incredibly arcane articles on this topic that appear in SABR publications?
And wasn't that a great recruiting message!
Another great recruiting message.
Bolding is a right!
You're missing some groundbreaking stuff.
At least you could have read "Underestimating the Fog".
That's like waiting for a Terence Malick film to come out!
http://tinyurl.com/mh7rk
Loney could be hitting .600 with 3 HR and he'd still lose his job to an expensive proven veteran. Why is the old man so anxious to be activated? This seems way too soon to activate him. Can't he just pack his bags and heal up for next season (with the Red Sox or Mets)?
D-Backs 13-10
Padres 10-13
Dodgers 10-13
Rockies 10-13
Giants 8-14
No comment, just the facts.
And maybe there will be an index too?
Yes, there will be an index.
Eric's Rule of Baseball Publishing #1: If you're going to publish the book without an index, you might as well not publish the book at all.
Needless to say, I lost this argument the first time around. Not this time.
Shall we start calling him "Clark"...?
Saito otherwise sat out all of '97 with injury, but was comeback player of the year in '98, when the Baystars won the Japan Series. Saito was 13-5 with a 2.94 ERA that year. In '99, he went 14-3. Then in '01 and '02, Saito was a full-time closer. Saito was 7-1 with a 1.67 ERA and 60 K's in 64 innings in '01. 47 of his 48 saves came in '01 and '02.
In the meantime, someone please tell Mr. Little for me that we have a saying 'round here, to wit, if it ain't broke, don't fix it [big contracts and/or big egos be darned].
Now to continue with Japanese baseball, the fight song for my favorite Central League team, the Yakult Swallows:
"Man blossoms as a flower of the earth
Baseball is a drama, it is life
Take the Tigers alive, catch the Whales
Swallow the Dragon, pull in the Carp
Knock down the Giant star
Fly away Swallows!"
On some other rather recent thread, someone wrote something about Mr. Baseball and about how the shuto might have been made-for-television baseball. Not only "no" to that, but the scenario re most homeruns in a season echoes the race of Randy Bass. Going into the last two games of that 1985 season, Bass, playing for the Hanshin Tigers, had 54 homers, one short of Oh's 55 homer single-season record. Bass got nothing to hit in those last two games. Bass was so disgusted with the unintentional but intentional walks that for one pitch, he held his bat upside down. According to reports, the pitch was about two feet outside for a ball. And not coincidentally, Mr. Oh just happened to be managing the opposition at the time.
And so too in 2001, when Osaka Kintetsu Buffaloes' star Tuffy Rhodes was tied with Oh at 55 homers, with three games left. The Buffaloes traveled to Fukuoka to play the Hawks for one game, and sure enough, Rhodes didn't see a pitch to hit. Rhodes did not manage to hit a homer in his last two games against the Oryx Blue Wave, but at least they pitched to him. In both instances, i.e., Bass and Rhodes, Oh's team[s] had already clinched, so a homer or two and a loss would have meant little to nothing for his team. And so the moral of the story is that Mr. Oh, Mr. Homerun in Japan, is a classless loser who deserves nothing but our contempt and scorn.
Lastly, the Yakult Swallows are, were, the Chicago Cubs of Japanese baseball. They hadn't won a thing until '78. And then came the 90's with 3 Japan Series championships, and they added another in '01. But still, over the life of the franchise, the Yakult Swallows rank 11th in record, with only, you guessed it, Takashi Saito's Yokohama Baystars having a worst lifetime franchise record.
You're not capable of making that statment. In fact, though you're welcome to dislike Kent as much as you want, your bias completely undermines any conversation about Kent that you're in. I'm not trying to attack you, but I don't know how you get around that.
Lugo's offensive stats are barely better than Kent's this season, despite this being a career (fluke?) year for Lugo and an injury-plagued one for Kent. Now that Kent is coming back after a long rest, I don't think it's crazy for the Dodgers to think he's better.
I don't rely on Rate 2, but you might note that Kent's Rate 2 at second base for the past three seasons is 106/96/120.
Meanwhile, Loney's had one good week. I love him, but again, we need a little perspective.
Loney and Kent are much closer. Loney right now is performing fairly well since his recall, but it's an extremely small sample size. That said, his approach at the plate has been much better and he's driving the ball into the gaps. He probably would not be able to match Kent's offensive output. Defensively, there is no comparison (again). Kent has historically been an awful 1B. His unwillingness to play the position may have a lot to do with it. He's a better defender at 2B than 1B, but he hurts you in the field at either position.
Then there is the prospect of Nomar coming back. Which Nomar is it going to be when he returns from the DL? The one who was contending for a batting title or the one who was one of the worst hitters on the Dodgers after the all star break and was a major reason for their big losing streak. I'm guessing that Nomar, if completely healthy should be very productive. His defense is a bit overrated, but he's at least average defensively. Nomar will have 1B job back and deservedly so.
Nothing like "farting on each other" in the locker room to turn things around...
Maddux is the consummate professional...
Time to go watch "Deadwood."
http://www.numenware.com/article/345/
http://www.yakult.co.jp/english/htm/index03.html
http://www.yakult-swallows.co.jp/
So remember to swallow your Yakult [and so, Yakult Swallow[s]]. And that's my Shirotaism of the day.
Oh, and Dan, the PDH are my initials and the 5204 is a certain number that some use to identify just who I am. My password? Gentlemen don't talk about such things in mixed company.
Oh, and I'm still holding out for, should someone decide to fix something that isn't broken:
1B - Kent
2B - Lugo
SS - Furcal
3B - Garciaparra
Send Loney down 'till roster expansion, with Betemit playing super-sub, and if need be, Lugo occasionally playing CF. One other option is to keep Loney up and say goodbye to Ledee. And, yes, though some think it insane, the Furcal, Lofton, Lugo trifecta is preferred. Nothing like speed on the bases to put pressure on the defense and the pitcher and otherwise guarantee some more fastballs for those following to hit. Or should I simply report that a divided concentration on their part works to our advantage?
Option Repko?
You can't have two sets of Cubs!
I see Yakult as more like the White Sox.
When forced to choose between a player who can hit and a player who cannot, choose the player who can hit.
And defensive replacement in the outfield is what Lugo and Repko are for.
478- that doesn't make sense either. What's the point of taking Betemit's superior bat and glove out of the lineup in favor of Kent? You are moving Nomar to a position that he doesn't want to play.
By what standard can Ledee "hit" but Cruz cannot?
It is true that Ledee also sucks this year, but (a) it's a small enough sample that he hasn't proven beyond all doubt that he sucks, as Cruz has, and (b) almost all of Ledee's playing time has come as a pinch hitter, which reduces offense by 20-25%.
Ledee (50 AB) - .250/.278/.404
As you say, small sample size for Ledee, but I'd still rather have kept Cruz.
Since Ledee stayed, if we need a left-handed bat off the bench when Kent and Nomar come back, I'd rather keep Loney with the team at this point.
Neither should be used to give Drew a day off, since Repko fills that role better. So both are bench/defensive replacements. At the time of the choice, Saenz was our first righty off the bench and Ledee our top lefty off the bench. That role is probably more significant than being the 5th OF, so choosing to keep Ledee made sense (until today, of course).
Caution: unless you read fairly quickly, bring something for intermission..
http://www.topix.net/content/kri/3195956469364581173032429204124197322070
I really enjoyed watching and following the team during this road trip.
Saenz 1B
Kent 2B
Furcal SS
Betemit 3B
Lugo OF
Repko OF
Ethier OF
Sure it did.
"He needs to reacquaint himself with that desperation, that motivation that made him pitch well his first years in Los Angeles,' says Jim Colborn, Perez's pitching coach for four years with the Dodgers. 'If he finds that, he'll be that killer pitcher they're looking for."
This could bring a whole new meaning to killer pitcher ..
"He once asked to skip a start because of a broken fingernail on his pitching hand."
Fingernails are important things for pitchers; pitching well with a broken one is darn near impossible. If it had been any pitcher other than Odalis, it wouldn't have been an issue at all.
It's called "securing a big contract."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGDBR2L5kzI
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/recap?gameId=250807123
But he is not throwing 93. The number of lefthanders in baseball who throw 93 can be counted on five broken fingernails, and FTOGS is not one of them.
My main fear is what managment will do w/ Betemit and Lugo to justify these irrelevant trades, and what prospects will suffer. It is obvious to Baseball people that the D's could field a good team (without pitching) for 10 million $. Politics won't allow this, so it will be fun watching, but for a true D's fan, the fun will probably be muted.
You do, and he has been.
The K-Rod loophole made me very very happy, since I grew up going to Angel stadium and watching Bobby Grich et al. I will look the other way on that one.
What the K-Rod loophole does is allow even guys who haven't been up before roster expansion to be used in the postseason. So if, say, we wanted to use Scott Elbert in the Division Series, all we'd have to do is point to Yhency Brazoban and say Elbert is his replacement.
Time for a Loophole Marching and Chowder Society?
Stan from Tacoma
Oh: and Derek Lowe
(Mom and Derek Lowe -- talk about an image nobody needs.)
We must all otherwise make sacrifices, and I would hope that our pitchers would feel confident that the middle infield could rightly be called the Vacuum Co., and the corners, well, they purportedly have the bats to make up for any shortcoming on the field. As I remarked above, I would like the Dodgers to keep Lugo for a while and I would simply submit that the balance of bat over fielding will more than compensate for any deficiency that might come with Nomar over Betemit and Kent over Nomar/Loney. Oh, let me add re the future. Do we not have a 3rd baseman in the works? So where does Betemit play if LaRoche works out? Betemit too is a free agent at years end, and I would prefer the Dodgers keep Lugo over Betemit, should it come to that. Please see this piece for the report re Royster reporting that the Dodgers need soon make a spot for LaRoche:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Jul-31-Mon-2006/sports/8794261.html
I still don't know if Kent's weaker defense is worth exchanging a historically better hitter for. I get that Kent is 38, but again, Kent at his worst is just about as good as Lugo at his best. I think the odds are very much in Kent's favor if he's healed. And as for Loney, I still think you may be making too much out of one week.
Bottom line, I don't think you risk cutting someone now, for what would at best me a marginal improvement over Kent, when it's under four weeks until the rosters expand. I think you've got to either put someone else on the DL or accept that a guy like Loney or Repko goes back to the minors.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.