Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
The Royals scored 10 in the 1st and lead Cleveland now by by just 10-7.
The Mets lead St. Louis 10-2 in the 4th and it's now 10-7 in the 8th.
Overall, batters hit .257 against Williams.
Very odd.
And we are going to have to go through all these high counts for five ao six innings!
Oh well, I must be able to take the ups and downs.
if he get's Adrian Gonzalez right at this moment i'll like our chances even more.
I don't know how an ump could miss that call on Roberts unless he went with the assumption that a high throw shouldn't have gotten the runner in time.
maybe it's his way of getting pumped up! i don't blame him one bit
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/chronicle/archive/2005/07/15/SPGN5DOH7M1.DTL
Based on what they anticipate, they make the call. Obviously, you aren't supposed to make a call based on this type of information, but it happens.
I imagine that it is even harder to avoid making these types of calls in the big leagues.
I think Cora plays that way against Williams because he killed someone in William's family and that was his way of atoning.
Garciaparra and Kent have also hit home runs against him.
He was way safe.
What is so bad about these loosing streaks is how predictable the D's get. In the first few innings, Penny rarely can throw strikes, sometimes he does OK, sometimes we start behind. Then we don't seem to have many leaders. When we feel we are whipped, most of the guys have terrible at bats.
Betemit, Garciaparra, and Kent are the only current members of the Dodgers with a home run against anybody
the umps should realise/thank there lucky stars that they have the job that they do (just !@#$%^ call a good game is all i ask!!)
Mike is Mr. Relief Pitching.
The Phillies and Padres have the same record right now. They are both 1 1/2 games out of te wild card.
As usual, when we start collapsing so does my internet connection, because they have continued to hook too many people to it. Time-Warner has bought Adelphia and promises to correct these problems, but I am far from optimistic.
We should stop playing utility players and bring up the prospects. If we miss the playoffs this year, so be it. This team would not show well in the post-season.
It persists to this day and it drives me nuts. Give me a quick, demonstrative call, please. Let the folks in the cheap seats know whats going on.
i see & respect you're point, but i really wish there was sometipe of psycho/test on umps, i swear they sometimes miss the clearst calls! (i'm probaly biased if you're watching from affar)
nah, it will just get us more upset, there's still plenty of baseball to play.
I'm really worried about that pendulum swinging back against the Dodgers.
Then it wouldn't be a pendulum. It would just be a big weight with a lot of potential energy then.
Furcal and Garc seem to have run into a wrecking ball these last few games. Maybe one of them will kick back at this assault.
Shin Soo-Choo triples in the tying run!
13-13 Cleveland vs. KC
One of the older guys hit a ball into the gap and tried to stretch it into a triple. He got thrown out at third. Upon being called out, he pops up and says "aww, shoot" (expletive modified).
Umpire tosses him because he thought he was cussing at him. With only having 9 players, the kid getting thrown out of the game would have caused us to forfeit.
I approached blue and asked him very nicely if he would reconsider because the player wasn't cussing at him and that it would suck for us to forfeit the game because of something so silly. He decided not to toss the kid and gave him a talking to instead.
7 IP, 2 H, 1 ER, 0 BB, 8 K, 1 HR, 88 pitches
Did they say anything about the game being protested?
But do we have a player or two who can rise to this occasion and make a statement? I have my doubts.
Rest easy, boys -- you tried. On to better things.
vr, Xei
Rule 8.06
A professional league shall adopt the following rule pertaining to the visit of the manager or coach to the pitcher:
(a) This rule limits the number of trips a manager or coach may make to any one pitcher in any one inning;
(b) A second trip to the same pitcher in the same inning will cause this pitcher's automatic removal;
(c) The manager or coach is prohibited from making a second visit to the mound while the same batter is at bat, but
(d) if a pinch-hitter is substituted for this batter, the manager or coach may make a second visit to the mound, but must remove the pitcher.
A manager or coach is considered to have concluded his visit to the mound when he leaves the 18-foot circle surrounding the pitcher's rubber.
Rule 8.06 Comment: If the manager or coach goes to the catcher or infielder and that player then goes to the mound or the pitcher comes to him at his position before there is an intervening play (a pitch or other play) that will be the same as the manager or coach going to the mound.
Any attempt to evade or circumvent this rule by the manager or coach going to the catcher or an infielder and then that player going to the mound to confer with the pitcher shall constitute a trip to the mound.
If the coach goes to the mound and removes a pitcher and then the manager goes to the mound to talk with the new pitcher, that will constitute one trip to that new pitcher that inning.
In a case where a manager has made his first trip to the mound and then returns the second time to the mound in the same inning with the same pitcher in the game and the same batter at bat, after being warned by the umpire that he cannot return to the mound, the manager shall be removed from the game and the pitcher required to pitch to the batter until he is retired or gets on base. After the batter is retired, or becomes a base runner, then this pitcher must be removed from the game. The manager should be notified that his pitcher will be removed from the game after he pitches to one hitter, so he can have a substitute pitcher warmed up.
The substitute pitcher will be allowed eight preparatory pitches or more if in the umpire's judgment circumstances justify.
Then it escalated from there, with the home plate ump's very questionable strike zone, the aforementioned Grady Little double visit to the mound, and then the ump who followed Penny around when Penny was finally ejected and was being pushed off the field by his 'mates. Basically umps being a little fascist and quick-triggered, and erratic, and the Dodgers being frustrated at this series in general.
After seeing some the difference of in and out of the zone last night, and then of course today, it's obvious this crew hates Blue.
vr, Xei
Reed then totally kicks the decision and when Grittle and Penny get (justifiably) p.o.'ed, Reed ejects both and then decides to follow Penny off the field. Purely unprofessional.
These calls have a direct effect on the integrity of the game. Fans need to know severe screw ups like these are not tolerated and what they are watching is kosher. Nothing will happen to any of the above mentioned umpires, though, and Selig will wonder why baseball has credibility issues.
Suicide by umpire?
Maybe the crew chief was thinking of this rule:
"In a case where a manager has made his first trip to the mound and then returns the second time to the mound in the same inning with the same pitcher in the game and the same batter at bat, after being warned by the umpire that he cannot return to the mound, the manager shall be removed from the game and the pitcher required to pitch to the batter until he is retired or gets on base. "
I hope Roberts doesn't bat, because I feel that would be the end.
I remember a game years ago where a team played under protest...but I don't know if these sort of circumstances call for it.
Quite a possibility, but only if it was Nuke LaLoche on the mound with Kevin Costner catching...
Just joking.
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate.
The umpire getting in between Lugo and the first base umpire wasn't a bad move.
A few others have succeeded also.
If the Dodgers protested, for the protest to have a chance of being upheld they would have to:
1) lose
2) prove that Penny's removal from the game was an incorrect interpretation of the rules
3) prove that the incorrect interpretation of the rules materially affected the outcome of the game.
Good luck with that.
I actually thought Little was pretty reserved and calm considering 1)they seemed to clearly give him an injury trip for his first visit and 2)the decision only seemed to be made after Bochy protested.
Interestingly, the Dodgers played in three of them in 1947, two of them eight days apart.
1. Well on their way to this outcome.
2. Did the ump tell Grittle that the first visit wasn't really a visit? If he did, and there's tape, they might have something.
3. They'll need to score for this to happen, but if they score two or three runs it becomes, at the very least, a case of who's-to-sayism?
July 20, 1947, St. Louis at Brooklyn: In the top of the ninth with the Cards ahead 2-0, Ron Northey hits a high fly deep to the wall in right center. The Dodgers CF Pete Reiser leaps but can't catch it, and after a couple of seconds the ball drops back on the field where RF Dixie Walker fields it, relays it to 2B Eddie Stanky, whose throw nails Northey at home. The first base umpire (there was a three man crew in those days) immediately ruled the ball in play, but the other base umpire signaled to Northey that it was a homer, so Northey slowed up. He was ruled out at the plate, and the Cards protested the game saying Northey had been deceived by the umpire and would have scored if he had not slowed down.
In the bottom of the ninth, the Dodgers scored three runs to win the game before the protest by a 3-2 score. NL President Ford Frick, who later became Commissioner, upheld the protest and awarded Northey a home run. However, he did not order the game resumed in the top of the ninth with the Cards ahead 3-0, which would have been the normal procedure called for by the rules. He allowed the Dodgers' runs to stand and ruled the game a 3-3 tie. (We can only speculate on what he would have decided if the Dodgers had hit a homer in the bottom of the ninth and scored four runs.) All the records counted except for the pitchers' win and loss. The game was replayed in its entirety as part of a doubleheader on August 18 that the Dodgers won.
8/17/1947
We are not sure if the Dodgers actually protested the game, but the game ended up being treated as if it were a resumed protested game. We are continuing to research it.
The game was the second game of a Dodgers at Phillies doubleheader. At the time Pennsylvania had a curfew on Sunday games saying they had to end no later than 6:59 PM. The Phillies had won the opener 4-0, and the second game was tied 4-4 after six innings as the curfew neared. The Dodgers scored a run in the top of the seventh, which caused the Phillies to adopt delaying tactics hoping the inning would not be completed and the game would revert back to a six inning tie. At that point, the game turned into a travesty.
The Phillies changed pitchers to eat up some time. The Dodgers then countered by having the runners on first and second trot toward the next bases hoping the Phillies would put them out, but the Phils permitted a double steal. Dodger batters swung at pitches well out of the strike zone. One of them was during an intentional walk issued after the double steal, but the home plate umpire did not allow that Dodger tactic. Finally the inning ended when the Dodger on third tried to "steal" home by trotting towards the plate and the Phillies decided they could not allow the run to score.
In the bottom of the seventh, the Phil's first hitter, Harry Walker, could not find his bat! That delayed things enough so that the count on him was 2-1 when the curfew went into effect at 6:59. At that point, the game was considered to be a six inning 4-4 tie.
The next day Ford Frick, National League President and later Commissioner, ruled that the game must be resumed (on September 25 when the Dodgers were next in Philadelphia) with Walker at bat with a 2-1 count and none out in the bottom of the seventh. He based his ruling on the umpire's report and possibly on the Dodgers protest if they made one. His official statement said "it was a farcical exhibition which was a disgrace to baseball and a complete travesty of all the rules of sportsmanship."
The Dodgers ended up winning the game 7-5 when it was completed on September 25 before the regularly scheduled game.
This is from UPI:
Charles Feeney, the National League president, today upheld the Pittsburgh Pirates' protest that the rain-abbreviated game they lost, 4-1, to the St. Louis Cardinals Monday night was improperly called by the umpires.
Feeney ordered that the game be resumed Wednedsay night, before the clubs' regularly scheduled game, from the point it was called - with one out in the top of the sixth inning.
The umpire in chief, John Kibler, called the game after rain delays of 17 and 22 minutes. Between the delays, play resumed long enough for two pitches to be thrown.
Feeney said he agreed with the Pirates' contention that Kibler called the game prematurely. National League regulations require that umpires wait at least 75 minutes during an initial weather interruption and 45 minutes during a second one before calling a game.
Feeney said Kibler had concurred with the facts as presented by the Pirates.
(The Cardinals ended up winning 4-2)
At least we don't have to go to Montreal anymore. Another black hole for Dodgerdom.
Have you ever wondered if the protest of a game has ever been allowed? Ron Fisher found one for the 1921 Pirates. On May 28, CIN at PIT in the bottom of the 8th Ron notes: "On the play at the plate, Luque made the tag, but got so mad at the safe call he threw the ball into the Reds dugout! Someone threw it out to Wingo and the rundown on Barnhart started! The Pirates complained, but the umps ruled in favor of the Reds!" The game was replayed from this point after the league President ruled that the assistance from the dugout was a little too much. The New York Times story on the game played the next day by the same two teams notes another interesting fate of a ball: "The ninth inning was featured by a freak home run when Barnhart's hit into right field went under a roll of canvass. The ball was recovered by a small boy, who fled with it, and the hit went for a homer". Apparently there was no protest about this!
I'm working on having 143 and 117 deleted.
The rule refers to the mound being 18 feet in diameter.
Re: 117 --i used professionally accepted bleeping out letters. Not enough?
:-)
Okay, I'm officially going to cease watching this game now. Before I get insomnia from the memories of it.
Oh well, if you want cursing you can go to the Bronx Banter comments I guess. Or an open miked Dodger-Padres game.
I'm going to watch some cartoons now or something.
They're not commandments. They're just suggestions. Kind of like what the Unitarians follow.
http://tinyurl.com/fq9hg
Similar thing, just in reverse
In the eighth inning, the game got contentious. Cubs manager Leo Durocher brought in Pete Mikkelsen to relieve. Mikkelsen hit Lou Johnson with a pitch and then made an error on a sacrifice attempt by Jim Lefebvre to put runners on first and second with no outs and Roseboro due up.
Cubs pitching coach Joe Becker (who had been fired as a coach by the Dodgers along with Durocher after the 1964 season) came out to talk to Mikkelsen and give rookie lefthander Jim Ellis time to warm up. Becker left the mound and headed back to the bench. But Durocher told Becker that Ellis was warmed up and sent Becker back to pull Mikkelsen and Ellis came in.
Dodgers manager Walter Alston then came out of the dugout to tell home plate umpire Tony Venzon that Mikkelsen couldn't come out of the game because Becker had already made a trip to the mound and left and he had to stay in. (The rule was new in 1967.) The umpires realized their error and ordered Mikkelsen back into the game. And Mikkelsen was able to get Roseboro to hit a grounder to second that Glenn Beckert ran to first base on his own as Johnson and Lefebvre moved up.
Now Durocher decided that he wanted Chuck Hartenstein to relieve. But Venzon declared that Ellis had to come in to pitch since he was already brought in. Becker and Durocher argued with Venzon about this and Becker got ejected. And Ellis had to pitch to Ron Fairly, whom he walked. Finally, Hartenstein was allowed to come in. Third baseman Bob Bailey lifted a fly ball to Cubs right fielder to Bob Raudman who threw out Johnson at the plate to end the inning.
Except of course, he hadn't been. That's an odd interpretation of being "in the game".
But the Padres treat the Dodgers like beating the better, more successful big brother. It's almost like the Padres play better against the Dodgers. What do I mean almost. They totally do.
Venzon later left the game when he started feeling ill.
They do now
ps- No Lube for you!!
The Dodgers, Padres, and Reds are all off Thursday.
vr, Xei
Maybe the 85-year old Ethier scout has another "hidden gem" we can steal from another team in exchange for this year's Bradley
No Gnomes. No hyperbole. No Knockers bigger than 3 inches. No Swearing. No walking off of the most direct path on the wet sand at night. No talking about the li
NOCARRIER *
Ah... I guess I need to take the ol' Sarcasm Detector in for a tuneup then, eh?
4 innings. LOL..... Nice job, ace. Way to be that stopper we need.
Maybe Trevor Hoffman, Dave Roberts, and Mike Piazza could all clears waivers and Kevin Towers could trade them for fodder before 8/31.
a) looking again
b) one hand pose
c) 2 handed pose
As you like to say so often, the stats don't tell you everything...
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.