Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Well that was a good start.
Good-bye. Ok.
http://tinyurl.com/kj7bz
But there is plenty of hope for tonight. Go D's.
And how did the big league team do against him? bleh.
That mark is 23!
Willie Mays would have caught it in 1951.
Actually I meant 1954.
based on what numbers?
it didnt count in the first inning?
Of course, their enigmatic superstar is a lot better than our enigmatic superstar. But he's more enigmatic.
If JD gets hot and his power returns to his career norm, we could actually be in pretty good shape.
WWSH
even with his base stealing abilities, I dont see how he is our second best offensive player. I mean, the average is nice but its as empty of an average as you are going to get.
That is correct. At my local burger stand, that's called "the Special Burger."
I've tried it twice to make sure that the severe instestinal distress was not happening by chance.
I've not had one since.
Got no Carl's back here but that pastrami burger looks intiguing.
Do you have a Hardee's?
Not really. Its rookie ball. Some take more time to adjust then others but the strikeouts do show that he has excellent stuff.
Like you said, he is old for the GCL which automatically makes me hesitant about him. He's going to have to prove it next year in Columbus before I get too excited.
how about Bridger Hunt? Right out of college and hitting over .300 in Columbus is impressive IMO.
With fried chicken instead of Carls' best burger IMO--the western bacon cheeseburger.
Around here, instead of the weird pastrami thing, they instead have a philly cheesesteak burger. Basically the same idea. I've had it, and it really wasn't all the great, although it didn't cause any "intestinal distress." The fried chicken can be a pretty good value, though. And Hardee's also has pretty good biscuits.
I do miss the western bacon, though. I certainly don't value it as much as the In-N-Out double-double, but I usually try to get one when I'm back in LA.
WWSH
Don't they have QuesTec at Dodger Stadium?
Thank you for running your way out of this inning.
Your buddy,
Greg Maddux
It's a matchup between baseball's savviest pitcher and baseball's savviest hitter!
Or at least that's the way Counsell is portrayed.
Or at least that's the way Maddux is portrayed.
But it doesn't do any good. Does anyone know what Nomar's average is when he puts the first pitch of an AB into play?
Well, who would you rather face, the Angels or the Mariners? The Twins (who the Dodgers faced) or the Rangers (who the Pads got) in interleague?
Thanks. Once again, numbers trump impressions; it has seemed awfully frustrating to see how "often" Nomar has messed up a good scoring chance by making an out on the first pitch.
How/where did you get that answer so quickly?
Click on players.
It was pretty blatant.
Cool; thanks.
Tomko has to get Drew out for Maddux to still have a chance for the win.
Mission accomplished. That was the first strikeout of the game by a Dodger pitcher.
I hope Tomko's willing to stay in the pen next season. He seems to be thriving there. I think the following rotation could work for 2007:
Lowe
Penny
Bills
Kuo (?)
Maddux (?)
Hopefully Maddux could be signed to a reasonable one year deal. And Kuo's arm will hopefully hold up.
WWSH
Chris Young is up, but he isnt in the lineup tonight. Then they have two outfielders, carlos gonzales and justin upton then a catcher Miguel Montero.
The guy leaned out over the railing and almost stuck his hand in Morneau's glove. If the umpire hadn't called it, I think that Ron Gardenhire would have had the umpire killed.
Seeing as how he didn't strike anyone out in 5 innings, I wouldn't have predicted him striking out "the side" in the 6th
I think he will, mostly because he's been thriving out of the pen, whereas he kinda sucked as a starter.
Which, I don't understand. From what I've seen of Tomko (although that is little, as I mostly just listen to the games on radio), his stuff seems to be excellent, and he seems to know what he's doing out there on the mound. Of course, the results have never had him as anything better than a mediocre #5. I wonder why?
I would say Rick has a case.
of the Mondays...?
Thanks again. Yeah, that's pretty good. Steiner was talking (in general terms) about how well Monday had done against Carlton, and Monday was not only doing the "aw shucks" routine, but talking about how he hated every minute of it.
Makes you wonder which Tim Stauffer-like pitcher owned Monday...
Monday was 4 for 30 against Gene Garber.
Beat me both to the stat, and to the inevitable political allusion arising therefrom.
At least we ar5e trying here with Tomato.
tonight, I don't get the feeling one run is going to be enough. I hope I'm wrong.
Micah Owings was giving me a scare when he was mowing down AA batters in the southern league. then he went to AAA tucson in the PCL and he has fallen apart.
Repko is full of double-switching goodness.
It must not have been an emergency since it happened yesterday.
Wow. Looks like Monday pounded Seaver harder than any pitcher not named Dick Ruthven (20 for 49, 7 HR); I'm not counting Garry Roggenburk, against whom Monday went 4 for 5.
We'll never know
But so did a lot of guys.
Darn, that looked like a Kenny play.
But the Angels-Yankees game will likely take four hours at its pace.
What are the odds?
Not that long actually as UCLA has boatloads of history majors.
It's 4-2 Angels.
It's going to be a long night out in Anaheim.
25 for 95, 7 doubles, 1 triple, 4 HR, 23 BB, 20 K, 263/407/484.
I think this is history in the making. I don't know when anyone has fouled so many off Bull.
And then got a hit.
1 Undeclared 3,306
2 Economics (incl related majors) 2,032
3 Psychology (incl pre-Psychology)2,002
4 Political Science (incl pre-Political Science) 1,804
5 Biology (incl pre-Biology) 1,391
6 History (incl pre-History) 1,212
7 English 1,188
8 Sociology 992
9 Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 798
10 Psychobiology (incl pre-Psychobiology) 710
Don't you remember from History 1A? I was the guy in the shirt.
Both of my undergrad majors are on that list
I wish I was. This is painful.
I'm glad I'm not.
And now would even be better...
Stop laughing.
Is it JD Drew's turn to clinch his player of the game?
I'm sorry what did you say? I was laughing.
The Giants have now won 1 straight!
Out loud, no less
Game would have been ours.
" Opportunities
Leading to a Bachelor of Arts degree, it is excellent preparation for a wide variety of careers -- law, teaching, business, the communications media, public services, and medicine."
I guess I fall under "public services", but wouldn't that include anyone who works for the government?
I can think of plenty of people who "work" for the government that aren't really "serving" the "public"
Bob Dylan said, "You've got to serve somebody."
But that was in his temporary insanity phase.
We're doomed!
Scrapperiffic.
Not a sock puppet.
Other players of note:
Kemp 0-4
Loney 1-3, BB, 2B, R, RBI
Young 1-4, 2B, K, GIDP
In the sense that he's a better pick than Hall? Not much left on the bench just now.
I was expecting a 1200 word treatise on why Lugo shouldn't have swung.
Yes, I left out that it would be from someone else.
The Toby Hall treatise checked in at 1,233 words.
nice
Looking over box score... Drew's having a nice game, Nomar is not (6 LOB??), Maddux was in midseason form (not a good thing), it's nice to have Saito in now, but maybe he should've come in in the 8th inning.
Good night.
His first error of the season was a ball that practically took the mitt off his hand.
For now.
The Arizona announcers are terrible, btw.
Meetcha over there.
Lord knows I'm ready when it is.
I thought it started on August 31.
You'll be swell! You'll be great!
Gonna have the whole world on the plate!
Starting here, starting now,
honey, everything's coming up roses!
Clear the decks! Clear the tracks!
You've got nothing to do but relax.
Blow a kiss. Take a bow.
Honey, everything's coming up roses!
Now's your inning. Stand the world on it's ear!
Set it spinning! That'll be just the beginning!
Curtain up! Light the lights!
You got nothing to hit but the heights!
You'll be swell. You'll be great.
I can tell. Just you wait.
That lucky star I talk about is due!
Honey, everything's coming up roses for me and for you!
I think it's time for bed.
Interpretively, of course. Um, go Dodgers.
Division I-A football starts on August 31 when Boston College plays at Central Michigan at 3 pm PT.
What'd I miss?
with any success Nomar should see plate appearance #7 of the night here
The line was good, but what I really can't shake is the mental image of the official Greg Brock performing it.
That's Mr. Green now.
Fan law?
Fan law.
235 No need for another treatise, Bob, since now we can simply mimeograph the one posted and hand it to Julio for further review. He even gets to smell it, hot off the press.
Wrong.
In the long 1989 game in Montreal, the Dodgers set a record by playing 22 innings and never once drawing a walk.
I'm guessing that Beimel is OK, and Grady is just going with the "this may go on a while, so I'm going with a starter who can give me a bunch of innings" theory.
That's 27 by the Braves in a 20-inning game in 1973.
Vin wasn't at the 22-inning game. Ross Porter did all 22 innings on the radio by himself as Don Drysdale was sick. I listened to the whole game with my grandmother.
The Dodgers didn't draw a walk that night because they had a really bad lineup.
Here is the boxscore from the 27 LOB game:
http://www.retrosheet.org/boxesetc/B05040PHI1973.htm
I just looked up the game (I'm getting better at using Retrosheet). Alfredo Griffin led off for the Dodgers and went 0 for 9. That's a good start on not drawing any walks.
They then deserve to lose like their next 5 games at least.
I never thought I'd see another Jim Tracy.
But I have.
Long live Bob Melvin!
Hence, 3.5 was coined by some genius. His name escapes me.
Nice. The Braves managed to turn 17 hits (including 3 doubles and a homer), 10 walks and 3 HBP into four runs. They deserved to lose. Just like the D'Backs tonight.
Don't forget the four errors the Phillies made as well.
That's what I was guessing. Thanks!
Arggh. I forgot that. Thanks! Dick Ruthven started that game for the Phillies, so I've now mentioned him twice tonight!
Five future managers played in that 1973 game: Johnny Oates, Davey Johnson, Dusty Baker, Bob Boone, and Larry Bowa.
http://tinyurl.com/rja7c
It mentions Shamsky and Blomberg from the Mets/Yankees of the 1970s; I'd pretty much forgotten them. Koufax and Greenberg are covered.
"he walked in his first career at bat he walks. what a ballgame. Wouldn't you know it!" -- Vin
I love it!
Too late!
;-)
Why are you apologizing to me?
SB - K Matsui (3, 2nd base off M Thompson/M Piazza), R Spilborghs (3, 2nd base off D Brocail/M Piazza), M Holliday 2 (9, 2nd base off S Williamson/M Piazza, 3rd base off S Williamson/M Piazza), B Hawpe (4, 2nd base off S Williamson/M Piazza), C Freeman (3, 2nd base off S Williamson/M Piazza)
Yeah, it's soccer. So what? Wanna fight about it?
"Hey, Orlando Hudson is up. He might hit a home run. But he probably won't."
It was also a long night for Steve Henson, who in addition to one of the lamer ledes in recent memory on his game story, screwed up the following passage in his notes column:
"Should the Dodgers make the playoffs, they would have 29 players to choose from in building a 25-man roster the active players as of Sept. 1 and minor league replacements for Eric Gagne, Jayson Werth, Yhency Brazoban and Bill Mueller, who are on the disabled list. Mueller has all but given up his attempt to rejoin the team as a pinch-hitter because his right knee simply won't cooperate.
The additional four openings would mean that players who contributed earlier in the year but were sent to triple A for seasoning could be eligible for the playoffs despite not being on the roster Sept. 1. Strong candidates include outfielder Matt Kemp, first baseman James Loney and left-handed pitcher Hong-Chih Kuo."
The Dodgers would have about 150 players to choose from, not 29, and as we know, they need not have been up earlier in the season as Henson claims. Tight deadline or no tight deadline, there's not much of an excuse for messing that up.
That said, I think Steve has clearly done a better job covering the Dodgers this year than he did last.
Posting a news item without first checking to see whether it has already been posted on The Griddle
Thanks, but I've decided to just let things like that pass.
So 11 would be posting incoherently.
No. 12 is okay, although I think that could fall under 11 or 3.
Diamondbacks Snake-bit with RISP.
It's groan out loud horrible.
I have listened to the last four games online as I live on East Coast. Fell asleep in rocking chair with the baby all four games. Woke up to check the score to find out they lost. ALL four games
Needless to say fellas, I will not listen tonight. We can't have another loss due to me.
Gotta change the mojo somehow.
I say this to you as a concerned Dodgers fan.
You should give up your child.
You have to think about the team.
Sheesh, priorities today.
Next thing you know, the baby is going to be fed and clothed too! Where does it all end?
Why when I was a youngster, I was allowed to crawl around the house naked while my parents listened to the radio during the 1966 pennant race.
Of course, I was the youngest of four children so that could have been my folks parenting technique by then.
That's kind of a big deal.
Always rooting for the teams in pale blue over the teams in red, eh?
Wigan vs. Reading?
Can you take penumbrage?
You were merely the straw that broke the camel's back
I've commented under various forms of impairment.
That particular person is gone and not coming back.
At least, not under the same guise
I saw that part, and the part before it.
Apparently I missed the part before those two parts.
Which volcanic rock do you live on?
Fascinating. Over a period of days, you could chart the slow buildup.
I'm gonna go ahead and guess you know him very well...
He didn't see Rule #14, no auto de fe!
Regarding the D's recent losing streak, I'm gonna take some blame here. My wife and I have been moving out of our apartment, and I think that the boxes were messing up the ch'i. We promise to unpack our house (now with windows!!) as fast as possible to right the ship.
Nobody expects it.
Andrew gets all the "edge" credit around here, but I like to mix it up a bit as well...
I feel a disturbance in the force.
I think Jon had a really hard time making that decision. He was in a tough spot. He doesn't want to ban anyone. He doesn't want to be a "fascist," as you put it. But he did what he thought was best for this blog, and he did it in a considered manner, without a knee-jerk reaction. He tried many other ways of remedying the situation before banning him. And, I might add, he did it with the support of a lot of people here.
480 Bob, re my treatise, yes, as noted, the walk at the worst possible time, the failure of some to play defense, and not keeping one's mistake in the park, and there goes 1 of the 40 that separates first from last. And if you think I can't be hard on Lugo, well, in line with what I wrote, one is indeed always hardest on those one loves the most, so I'm hardest on me, but in Toby Hall's defense at least he was being asked to take a strike while that pitch to Lugo, and that swing, well, pathetic. He's lucky I'm not his manager, since his return to the dugout is met with my eyes like daggers. Plus the appropriate off color query asking just what was that...
And to now add to the treatise and otherwise more fully answer Jon's initial query, yes, I expect them both, and as to why, well, if need be, everybody we expect to steal on a regular basis gets out there and runs under simulated game conditions. Everybody expected to be at the plate when that running occurs stands in there, but doesn't swing, and he gets to see, after that throw to second or third, just where runner x need be in relation to pitcher y's release so that it might fairly be said that runner x has stolen the base. We do that often enough and we don't even have a concious choice any more, I mean, I don't need to evaluate the probabilities when it comes to my breathing and blood circulation, as the autonomic and subsconcious me do just fine in that regard and never mind any conscious thought on my part. So he won't make the conscious decision to not swing, since the lesson will be so ingrained that he just won't swing. That's what we're aiming for [you can call me their drill sargeant if you like, since the purpose is entirely the same]. And back to '78, well, the one stat I left out, that I wish so much that we'd repeat, and with more than the one soul, as in, with Furcal, Lofton and Lugo it could three of them, but with their own lesson ingrained, as did Lopes in '78, one could reasonably expect to see 45 SBs with 4x caught stealing for each of them.
I'll otherwise let those who believe the stolen base overrated to explain why we don't want to trade 12 outs for 135 additional bases, and never mind any associated effect that might attend that running riot on the basepaths such as those fastballs that those following might all the more expect to see, and I'll otherwise be so generous as to grant the proposition that for all 12x caught stealing, the runner would have otherwise scored...
(455) agree, cause in a relative sense, who cares if someone uses the 'word' teh, rather than trying to drive down the 101?
Jon has said it himself on numerous occasions. DodgerThoughts is not a democracy; it is a benevolent dictatorship.
(Oh yeah! I just used a ";". You gonna ban me Bob?)
I prefer "ruthful" over "benevolent"
I suppose since he didn't bother you, he was harmless. Never mind who else he bothered. Never mind I spent more time making peace after the damage he caused than for all other commenters combined.
I went out of my way, more than I have for just about any other commenter here, to try to keep the peace with him, to try to help him be a welcome commenter here, long after many people wondered why. Since the beginning of the season, I've tolerated the guy despite comments that were in clear violation of the guidelines that everyone else here seems to be able to follow. He clearly didn't want the help. I tried to be nice - it didn't work. I got tough - it didn't work. Nothing worked.
So please, spare me your admonitions and your casual talk about facism. If you don't like the way things are done here, there are plenty of other message boards where the kind of freedom you want can be found.
Indeed.
And, yes, you and Mr. Brock are correct, since the course of events, well, based on my experience of prior human history, given certain initiating events, the subsequent course of history was most certainly probable. But for the irony that I noted prior without calling it such, that circumstance is precisely why he stays. I suppose that the broader issue could otherwise be phrased in terms of, what do the third persons do when some other is bent on self-destruction? If it helps, call it suicide by cop [since that's precisely what it was].
486 Linkmeister:
I know where Kilauea is. I live on Isenberg St. in Moilili [rather near the park that once housed the old Honolulu Stadium]. And we live on a volcanic rock, which is kind of what makes this place unique, I mean, nearly all the rest here live on some bland continent that starts and stretches from nowhere to forever, but you and I live on that part of the volcano that breached the ocean and lived to tell the tale. And you and I don't need climb Mt. Everest, as we live on top of our very own Mt. Everest. As you can see, I revel in it...
Yawn.... My parents live in a volcano, at least half of the year.
And we're not talking the lucrative, interpretive kind...
It is not. He only made a fascist analogy. Godwin's law is more specific.
But then you'd be a semantics Nazi...
>>ducks<<
I think your math or judgement of the players is off.
It would be better to trade 12 outs for 135 additional bases. That means stealing at a better than 90% success rate.
one could reasonably expect to see 45 SBs with 4x caught stealing for each of them.
What is reasonable about implying that Furcal, Lugo, and Lofton can each steal bases at a 45/49 clip?
Since when could those three ever do that?
It's easier to resist when you keep in mind that they want you to respond, and that you're playing into their hands by doing so
I know you can't respond right now. He's probably listening. Just tap your feet three times.
Wait, am I in Kansas...?
"Where is that Joe Buck?"
Good times.
Mark Teahen for Octavio Dotel will go down as Billy Beane's worst trade of his career.
While Teahen wasnt playing that great in the minor leagues at the time, certainly trading a prospect for a reliever goes against most sabermetric thought. Its strange how the one trade that is an outlier to the way the A's usually do business, might be their worst trade of the 2000's.
Tim Hudson for Charles Thomas, Dan Johnson, and Juan Cruz is far worse. Hudson may not be Tim Hudson anymore, but for what he was worth, that is the real stinker.
That trade is now effectively Tim Hudson for Brad Halsey.
Which I still don't think is as bad as trading away Steve Karsay for Mike Fetters.
Keep in mind Teahen has put together only 200 really good at bats. He was terrible in April, demoted in May, had a solid June and has been godly since. Given the information avialable at the time, it was a solid trade, and if Teahen cools off, you can't really call it a mistake.
RF, LF, trade Chavez's contract and put him at 3b.
There's plenty that could have been done with Teahen.
Given the information avialable at the time, it was a solid trade,
When is trading prospects for a middle reliever ever a solid trade? Especially one that everyone in the A's organization was very high on. I was reading about how most felt Teahen could develop into a Jason Giambi-esque talent. There's nothing wrong with trading Teahen, its always what you get back. But Octavio Dotel?
Teahen for Dotel is about as bad as Konerko for Jeff Shaw.
Dotel may be good, but how many innings was he really going to pitch? What impact, even if he's perfect, would he have made?
60 innings or 600 ABs? Whats more important?
A healthy Chavez is one of the top 15 players in baseball, and at least at the time, people were waiting for him to drop a 45 jack season. You don't trade a guy like that.
The A's were trying to win a World Series. Their bullpen was an utter disaster. Octavio Dotel was one of the two or three most dominating relievers in baseball over the prior few years. (Not to mention a former starter who could be converted back to that if, say, you have a quirky personal abhorrence toward trading for relievers.) Mark Tehean was a prospect on the wane at the time, who precious few thought could turn into anything remotely resembling Jason Giambi. (Although now, after the fact, they will gladly tell you that they thought that.)
I just don't see how it was a terrible trade. A calculated risk, yes. A bad deal given the information available at the time, no.
"Results 1 - 1 of about 2 for 'Baseball America' Dotel Tehean
...
Did you mean to search for: 'Baseball America' Hotel Tehran?"
Should I count the records of the Boston and Chicago entries in the NA along with records for the Braves and Cubs?
If a pitcher is only used in a save situation, then I think that pitcher is replaceable no matter how great they are. You'd have a point if Dotel was used as a fireman, but he just another closer that throws 70 innings. 70 innings, great or not, is still only 70 innings.
"The Royals' return on Beltran, a 27-year-old impending free agent and five-tool center fielder, seems reasonable considering the circumstances. Because the Royals fell out of contention in the American League Central quickly, and because Baird felt he had to get something for Beltran in a trade, the Royals were going to have a hard time getting fair value for their best player.
...
Teahen, a supplemental first-round pick in 2002 out of Saint Mary's, began the year as the No. 15 prospect in the A's system, but he has had a breakout 2004 season, earning a promotion to Triple-A Sacramento after hitting .335-6-36 at Double-A Midland.
Since his promotion, Teahen has batted .275-0-10 in 69 at-bats, with eight doubles. Power is the biggest question mark with Teahen. He had a .543 slugging percentage at Midland, but his .391 mark at Sacramento is closer to the .366 career slugging mark he had entering the 2004 season. Teahen, 22, also has a 40-66 walk-strikeout ratio in 266 at-bats this season. He has a plus arm and average range, and had made just six errors in 73 games this season."
You would be the only yahoo who would matter in this case.
So Mrs. O'Leary's cow is a defining factor?
"Team" being defined loosely for the benefit of the Philadelphia A's.
That's pretty lucky.
You really only need 3 for the playoffs.
Why not make the 4th guy the closer?
I'd still do that trade again. It's a win-win-win trade for all three teams involved. I don't even think it qualifies as a bad trade; as a "worst trade ever", it's not even on the map.
BTW, for a fun exercise, check out Dotel's career stats against Ichiro. Total ownage.
The second hit was a grand slam by Ryan Howard.
Except the obvious 4th guy would have been Harden, a 22-year old career starter and premium prospect. It would be something akin to making Billingsley the Dodger closer for this year's stretch drive and playoffs. Would have been a pretty ballsy move, but it might have worked.
Still, though, the point remains that nobody knew Teahen would be this good. (And, for that matter, we still don't.) He wasn't going to displace Chavez, and your suggestion of moving an iffy prospect who appears to have little power to a corner outfield slot just doesn't cut it as a realistic possibility.
Seemed to work for them.
Generally, I'd agree.
But I think if the A's still had Teahen it would be a Ryan Howard/Jim Thome situation but with more flexibility since Teahen can play other positions. If the A's were committed to only playing Teahen at 3rd, Beane could definitely sell Chavez off for something good, and at the very least create some more payroll flexibility.
Rodriguez had been used in relief exclusively in 2002 in the minors.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.