Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
Originally published August 31, 2004.
Leading is easy, clinching is hard.
Even with a healthy lead in your pennant race, a relative eternity awaits before you get to raise the flag. This invites a tension that more often than not will be more than is necessary.
Most of the time you win with a September 1 lead - but you lose just enough to make it interesting.
Since moving to Los Angeles for the 1958 season, the Dodgers have been in first place, or tied for first, 13 times on September 1. Nine of those times, the Dodgers have made it to the next round (Update: after 2004, it became 10 out of 14) - but the earliest they have clinched was three weeks into the month, with 11 games to spare. The finish line is almost always a little farther away than you'd like.
However, the Los Angeles Dodgers have never blown a September 1 lead like the one they've earned in 2004.
With a lead of two games or fewer on September 1, the Dodgers have lost as many titles as they've won - three good, three bad. Out of seven September 1 leads of more than two games, the Dodgers have successfully closed out six. The biggest September 1 lead they have blown was 3 1/2 games, in 1962. (It was even worse than that, as you'll recall or see below. And 1973 was nothing to smile about, either...)
Dodger Teams in First Place on September 1
Team: 9/1 ... Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 78-60 ... 10-14 ... 88-74
Giants: 76-62 ... 14-10 ... 90-72
Key moments: The Giants tied the Dodgers on September 11 and moved a game up on September 12. The Dodgers rallied to catch the Giants two days later and then went two games up on September 16. Infamously, the Giants swept a two-game series September 17-18, with one-run victories in both games, sending the Dodgers into a five-game losing streak that knocked them into second place for the remainder of the season.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 61-57 ... 17-9 ... 78-66
Rockies: 60-57 ... 17-10 ... 77-67
Key moments: The Dodgers fell out of first place on September 2, regained the lead September 4, were tied for the better part of a week (September 6-10), then fell into second place for two weeks. A 4-3 victory over the Rockies gave Los Angeles the lead September 25, but the Dodgers lost the next day. They took the lead for good with a 7-4 victory September 27 and held on for the final three days of the season.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Braves: 72-58 ... 22-10 ... 94-68
Dodgers: 72-58 ... 21-11 ... 93-69
Key moments: In the first of several topsy-turvy Septembers for Los Angeles in the 1990s, the Dodgers trailed the Braves when September 1 began, but tied them at the end of the day, then went up on September 4. No more than two games separated the teams for the remainder of the season. The lead changed hands seven times, with the Dodgers holding the lead from September 21 (thanks to a 2-1 victory over Atlanta) until the Braves tied it October 2. Atlanta went up for good on October 4, and clinched the division with one day to spare October 5.
Team: 9/1 ... Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 77-55 ... 17-12 ... 94-67
Astros: 71-62 ... 11-18 ... 82-80
Giants: 70-63 ... 13-16 ... 83-79
Reds: 68-64 ... 19-10 ... 87-74
Key moments: The Astros cut the Dodger lead to four games on September 9, then faded. The Reds made something of a late run but had too much ground to make up, with the Dodgers clinching the division on September 26 with six games to spare.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 74-53 ... 21-14 ... 95-67
Padres: 69-60 ... 14-19 ... 83-79
Reds: 68-60 ... 21-12 ... 89-72
Key moments: A breeze, mostly. Leading by as many as 9 1/2 games, the Dodgers lost five out of six, allowing the Reds to slice the lead to 4 1/2. That was the worst of it, though, and the Dodgers clinched on October 2.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 77-56 ... 14-15 ... 91-71
Braves: 76-58 ... 12-16 ... 88-74
Key moments: Tension but no drama - the Dodgers never relinquished their lead, but did not clinch until their 160th game, September 30.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 80-54 ... 15-13 ... 95-67
Giants: 78-57 ... 11-16 ... 89-73
Reds: 73-61 ... 19-8 ... 92-69
Key moments: The Dodgers were never threatened, leading by as many as 9 1/2 games, a cushion plenty large enough to withstand the Reds winning nine of their final 10. Clinch day was September 24 - game 156.
Team: 9/1 ... Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 80-53 ... 18-11 ... 98-64
Reds: 72-62 ... 16-12 ... 88-74
Key moments: The Dodgers, who started the season 22-4, played strong to the finish. They accelerated to a 13 1/2-game lead early in September and posted their earliest clinch in Los Angeles: September 20, game 151.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 84-49 ... 18-11 ... 102-60
Reds: 81-53 ... 17-11 ... 98-64
Key moments: The Reds beat the Dodgers in Los Angeles on September 13 and 14 to cut the Cincinnati deficit to 1 1/2 games. The next day, behind a Jimmy Wynn seventh-inning grand slam and a Don Sutton complete game, the Dodgers defeated the Reds, 7-1, to stem the tide. The Reds lost five of seven games, and not even a six-game winning streak near season's end could rescue them. Still, the Dodgers didn't wrap up the division until the season's second-to-last day, October 1.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 83-53 ... 12-13 ... 95-66
Reds: 81-55 ... 18-8 ... 99-63
Key moments: No one ever talks about 1973, but this was one of the most miserable collapses in Dodger history. From August 31 through September 12, the Dodgers dropped nine consecutive games and 11 of 12 - needing only two weeks to turn a four-game lead into a five-game deficit. On September 16, the Reds' lead grew to 6 1/2 games. The Dodgers trimmed the margin back to 4 1/2 games in time for a three-game series with the Reds beginning September 21, but lost the first two, including an 11-9 defeat in which Sutton was KOed in a seven-run first inning. Cincinnati clinched September 24 - game 157.
Team: 9/1 ...Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 75-59 ... 22-6 ... 97-65
Reds: 74-58 ... 15-15 ... 89-73
Giants: 72-57 ... 23-10 ... 95-67
Braves: 72-60 ... 14-16 ... 86-76
Pirates: 73-62 ... 17-10 ... 90-72
Phillies: 68-63 ... 17-13 ... 85-76
Key moments: Three teams began the month within half a game of the lead, with three others within 5 1/2 games. San Francisco made the strongest move, tying the Dodgers with a 3-1 victory over Los Angeles on September 7 (the teams' last head-to-head meeting) and taking over the league lead a day later. On September 16, both the Dodgers and Reds trailed the Giants by 4 1/2 games. So what did the Dodgers do? They finished the season on a 15-1 run, tying the Giants on the 26th, passing them on the 28th and clinching the league title October 2 (game 161).
Team: 9/1 ... Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 81-54 ... 18-9 ... 99-63
Cardinals: 75-60 ... 18-9 ... 93-69
Giants: 74-62 ... 14-12 ... 88-74
Key moments: By September 15, the Cardinals had reduced the Dodgers' six-game lead to one, just in time for a three-game series between the two teams in St. Louis. Los Angeles swept the series and never looked back, clinching the division September 24 (game 157).
Team: 9/1 ... Rest of Year ... Final
Dodgers: 89-47 ... 13-16 ... 102-63
Giants: 85-50 ... 18-12 ... 103-62
Key moments: This one, people talk about. On September 22, the Dodgers recorded their 100th victory. They led the National League by four games with seven to play in the regular season. But they lost six of their final seven, including a 1-0 defeat at home against St. Louis on the season's final day, and fell into a tie with San Francisco. A three-game playoff followed, with the Giants routing Sandy Koufax, 8-0, in the opener, losing 8-7 in the middle game, then winning, 6-4, in the finale - with a four-run ninth inning in Los Angeles.
Thanks, Baseball-Reference.com and Retrosheet.
--they really are guidelines, not rules. The fact is, I don't jump on every single so-called violation.
--When comments became a part of this site, most of these guidelines didn't exist, even in my head. (Probably, only 1, 5 and 9 did.) They evolved because over time, I could see what caused the commenting to turn sour. If they seem overrestrictive, I don't disagree - but experience has taught me that things go bad in here without them.
--I never planned to post a list, but people kept asking for one, and I didn't think it was fair to ignore that.
--It gives me no pleasure at all to play the schoolmarm. But I think the many good times that people seem to have on the site are worth it.
Thanks for understanding (as much as you can).
Come for the baseball discussion, stay for the historical allusions!
He must have had to remove Casey from the keyboard.
for me it was new & fresh, 1973 was a really bad year for us wow.
You do the math.
In the meantime, just picture a sharp stabbing pain with every letter I type.
sant feeling of community. Nobody sane would relish this role, but Jon does a good job and regulars seem to pitch in and help guide newer people. I hope this support keeps it from being a killer job.
On another tack, I just read a disturbing bit at LAdugout.com about dropping compensation for free agents loss.
I'm not sure if this is even going to happen and I've seen differing opinions here. But this piece makes it sound like a done deal, and I can't help getting a tone from it that almost says "Well we can get back to the way it be should be with several rich franchises getting most of the marbles and having strong farms too". Maybe the thrust isn't this actively evil, but there seems to be no concern, at the least.
But is it Milton's pain or Hendrickson's...?
Orange
Horses
Beheading
Catholic
Cannons
Hangings
Battles
King
Queen
Parliament
Civil war
Treason
Trial
Guilty
Religion
My first thought was actually incorrect - that this continue the trend of trying to pick off one of the Dodgers many fine prospects before settling for some other teams' mediocrity - then I realized Kottaras is actually one of the Padres top prospects (at least he was #2 entering the year) so instead I'm just feeling warm and tingly with the idea that the Padres will give him up for a rental player.
Also: Why was Hamulack sent down to Vero Beach? So he can pitch a little bit before coming back on Monday?
Keeping with the theme set today, I assume the movie is "Cromwell" with Richard Harris as Cromwell and Alec Guinness as Charles I.
in all honesty i don't even think he left the Dodgers, I know for sure Kuo is here.
That was Thomas Cromwell however, not Oliver.
The Oliver Cromwell film with Richard Harris is not particularly good. Richard Harris really hams it up.
Football
Orange paint
Rockets
Green smoke
Rain
Moron
Eaten back
Out of shape
Get in shape
Bakersfield
Oil rigs
Babe Ruth
Safest place to live in case of a nuclear war
Acid rain
Great hands
Reunion
White shoes
Mud
Boxing
Flood
Small town
Prank
Hail mary pass
(This happens frequently, as I run in very hip circles)
http://www.theonion.com/content/node/52274
Jez 1
Grave
Civil war
Prison
Train
Hangings
Horses
Gun fight
Buried gold
Shorty
Wanted
Beatings
Cross
Blow up bridge
Harmonica
Price on head
The jist of it is that Teahen absolutely refused to take any advice that was given to him, from both the A's and from George Brett, until he got sent back to Omaha this year. He's since incorporated what Brett taught him, and here we are.
Come on capdodger it's obviously The Good The Bad and The Ugly. Can we please end this game now?
Penarol1916: 2
Bob: 2
Jez: 1
Today, there is a beauty from Lowe via the LA Daily News:
"The thumb remains enough of an issue, though, that Lowe was resigned to not swinging in a 14th inning at-bat against Bill Bray. Lowe walked on five pitches.
'I kept telling (catcher Jason) LaRue that I wasn't going to swing, but I guess I looked hitterish' Lowe said, 'I had no intention of swinging but when you're hitting (.093) you put the fear of God in people. ... He could have thrown three down the middle and I would have gotten booed and walked away.'"
I think he is right, he does look hitterish.
Vacant house
Gas pump
Truck
Basement
Hammer & Nails
Radio
TV
Child
Grave yard
Johnnie
Fire
Board up
Torch
Bonfire
Clean-up
Satellite
Venus
Giving up Kottaras is fine with me. He isnt much of a prospect in my opinion especially considering the depth they have at catcher.
If the Dodgers are stupid enough to trade a real prospect for him like Kemp or Laroche, they deserve to implode.
The Dodgers will be in the playoffs and their pitching is too strong to make them even need Wells in the playoffs. Theo must be dreaming if he thinks he can score a legit prospect for Wells at this point. His is just desperate to salvage something from a lost season.
"Night of the Living Dead"
Penarol1916: 2
Bob: 2
Jez: 1
Skybluestoday: 1
In 59 the Dodgers were 1 game behind the Giants, with Milwaukee in third, 2.5 games out. The Braves and Dodgers ended the season tied, and the Dodgers won a best of 3 playoff to win the NL pennant.
In 66 the Pirates and Giants were tied for first on 9/1, with the Dodgers 3 games back. The Dodgers clinched the pennant in the last game of the year, when Sandy Koufax pitched a complete game against the Phillies at Connie Mack Stadium in his last National League appearance.
Stan from Tacoma
So is Kuo/Guo starting on Monday? I wonder why the rush to call him up yesterday if he's not pitching 'til Monday...
He said Lofton, which I expect will happen, but my opinion is that Kemp should get moe time in CF.
Scott Long doesn't seem to like it.
http://firstinning.com/players/Andy-LaRoche-687/
vr, Xei
Giant
Warren Buffet
Seltaeb steem Sivle
J.R.
Bat
J.G.
Riots
J.L.
"Cisum fo Dnuos"
L.J
Blood
H. Betsy
This past July we ended up with a day to kill in Cleveland and spent the afternoon in the Rock and Roll museum/hall of fame which I thought was a bit steep at $20. But the special exhibit was about Dylan, and there was quite a bit of cool stuff from his early life -- yearbooks, letters from Joan Baez, etc. We then got to see an Indians-Twins game at Jacobs Field, which was a complete treat. Cleveland --more than just the mistake on the lake!
If he's a butcher, however, another outfield spot might make more sense.
From what I've noticed, Kemp takes better paths to the ball than Lofton and looks more fluid in CF.
I'm just thinking we should swap Kemp and Drew, if Kemp has the arm for right.
Re: Kemp, I recall scouting reports saying that he doesn't have great range but it's improved and he's got a good arm. Lofton has good range, but he doesn't seem to see the ball as well as he used to and his reaction time isn't great. In short, Kemp (and Repko) will still spell Lofton, and Lofton will get more chances to rest so he's fresh for the post-season (assuming they make it!) but Lofton's still the starter. And Kemp may project better as a corner outfielder.
Now, if he could burnish the cat, I'd be impressed.
Also, why is a Fleetwood Mac fan site called burnish.net? How does burnishing apply to Fleetwood Mac?
That said, she'd immediately be the best columnist in the LA Times Sports section if she were so hired.
88 Hmm... sounds like defensive projections are unreliable or at least, unrefined:) This is what I've heard before.
I wish I'd have watched Kemp's games more closely.
1992 the other year of the riots due to Rodney King, et al was the first year of two the WS champion was not in the US, Remeber Toronto's run in 92-93. Warren Buffet was also making news around this time.
Too bad Berkeley lowered their academic eligibility standards for athletes; they are able to admit players that UCLA can't.
Warren Buffet = Has run Berkshire Hathaway Inc. starting in 1965
Giant = Juan Maricial incident. Fined $1,750 and suspended 9 games for hitting Roseboro. Ah, the good old days. Gee, can you imagine what the penalty would be if someone pulled that stunt today?
Bat = Juan M.
Blood = Juan M.
Riots = Watts
Seltaeb steem Sivle = Elvis meets Beatles
H. Betsy = Hurricane Betsy
"Cisum fo dnuos" = "Sound of Music"
L.J. = Lou Johnson
J.L. = Jim LeFebvre
J.G. = Junior Gilliam
J.R. = John Roseboro
Drew accounted for 299 yards 162 on three punt returns, 65 on 15 carries, 52 on a pair of receptions, and 20 on a kickoff return. The five touchdowns tied the UCLA record he set in 2004 against Washington.
Hopefully the Bruins will be a lot better on defense but I will miss Mo Drew.
'Course, if Hawai'i should happen to win, ESPN might pick it up for one of their mid-week late-night replays. And we do get a full replay the following day.
I suspect that Markey can be close to as good as Drew. I remember that he faded in the second half of the season. I predict that the Bruins will miss Marcedes Lewis the most.
Foot in mouth.
Make that 63 and 74
See Adam Eaton this year - no suspension for starting the Angel-Ranger hostilities
but Lackey gets suspended 4 games for the same offense one or two years prior.
1988 Dwight Gooden Alfredo Griffin-no fines or suspensions for admitting throwing at Alfredo.
1988 David Cone to Pedro Guerrero same thing on same weekend!
Dodgers forfeit a game at home on "Ball night" for having balls thrown on field.
Giants never had to forfeit for their fans throwing any hard object at Dodger players over the years at the "Stick" including the 1988 doubleheader when Lasorda had to pull his team off the field with all the garbage thrown being directed at Gibson.
http://vivalosdodgers.com/wallpaper.jpg
Koufax was hurt down the stretch in 1962 (circulatory problem). He was given credit for just showing up, but he admitted later that he shouldn't have pitched that game.
There's a lot of blame passed around for 1962. Nearly all of it given to Alston. With today's media, Alston would have been fired. There would have been too much criticism. Alston of 1962 was probably worse than Grady Little of 2003 in terms of criticism.
On the other hand, I will take my son to see his first game in October to see Alabama@UT! That's something to look forward to.
http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/article.jsp?id=11968
Ironically he's now on the same team as former Pac-10 golden boy QB Kyle Boller, from Cal.
I've never understood the Kyle Boller phenomenon.
My big game this year, aside from the UCLA home games, will be going to South Bend to most likely watch UCLA get rolled by Notre Dame. I will get watch UCLA setting slaughtered in person twice this year. I think the USC game will be another wipeout.
58 Cops never would have recovered it had the robbers not painted themselves into a corner.
If you have not heard it, Rob McMillin at 6-4-2 has the audio of Vin's call of the 9th inning of Sandy's perfect game. I am sure you can find it quickly with a google search.
Stan from Tacoma
Before new UCLA defensive coach DeWayne Walker was hired, he asked Pete Carroll for advice if the Bruins defense, which last year had one of the worst, could be turned around. Apparently, Pete gave him an earful, held nothing back and advised Walker to walk or run away from the job. Walker accepted the challenge of the job, regardless of what Pete had to say.
The funny thing is, thanks to Pete, Walker has plenty of bulletin ammo for years to come against SUC.
I look forward to seeing the Bruins defense go head on with SUC this year and give it their all.
Speaking as a UCLA fan, the Bruins could have enough bulletin board material to jam every paper shredder at the CIA, but unless they narrow the talent gap with USC, it's likely to be another 45-10 style hammering this year.
Everybody throws out Scott Podsednik! I'm thinking of putting Podsednik on one of my lists.
But it's just in the exploratory stages. He's one of those "Why don't people realize that he stinks?" players.
Please continue.
Boller was never actually all that good. In fact, in his first three years, he was downright bad. Jeff Tedford came in, rebuilt his mechanics, and turned him into an above average Pac-10 QB (which, for a senior, doesn't say much), and he does have a huge arm. I can't say I'm surprised he's flamed out in the NFL. To be fair, however, his receiving corps and O-line have been awful. The Ravens O-line is remarkable for its ability to run-block and complete inability to pass-block.
Look what moving from Arizona to Denver did for a very mediocre Jake Plummer.
Aaron Rodgers - he's the real deal. Better than Leinart, I know that. The questions are whether (1) Brett Favre will ever retire, and (2) whether the Packers will ever have another decent O-line themselves.
As a Packer fan since the early 70s, and a Cal fan since the mid 80s, the upside/downside potential of Rodgers starting for the Packers might just kill me.
That approach will likely work better.
Meanwhile, I don't think Plummer himself was as mediocre as he was just trying to do everything himself in Arizona, given they had a horrible offensive line, and no running game. But definitely, going to a place with a superior line (and coaching staff) helped Plummer immeasurably, no doubt.
Btw, speaking of "short bus" - has anyone seen previews or read about that film? Heard it was great, looks really good - and also like something that will give the MPAA (and the easily squeamish) some difficulties...
221 consecutive NFL starts at QB (the guy hasnt missed a game since 1992).
I think thats a greater accomplishment than Cal Ripken's streak.
I like Favre - and expect they will play him into the ground, as you guys say, but I just have a hunch we'll see Rodgers play some this year. Favre really needs to show he's not "done" for me to at least change that hunch.
How do you know this? (I'm not being snarky, just genuinely curious.) Are his college numbers that much more impressive? What other intangibles would you say make him better?
138 I'm no expert, and I'm a Cal homer by plenty, but FWIW, what distinguishes Aaron Rodgers is a crisp and very accurate short to mid range ball.
Teams (played on 5)
MVP (2)
Rookie of the Year
World Series (played in 5)
Manager (5 teams)
Hall-of-Famer
All-Star (13 times)
Hits 2,943
RBI 1,812
SB 204
AVG .294
SLG .537
Virgo
Bats R
Throws R
Fun fact: Played basketball and baseball with two other Hall-of-Famers both with the initials B.R.
Quote:
"He solidified the club. We became a great team when he came to know us and how much he could do for all of us."
B.R.
It was the fad earlier in the decade where a lot of QB's came from nowhere to lead their teams to success (Kurt Warner, Tom Brady), but pretty much every successful team now has a former first rounder at QB.
Happy birthday, Frank.
Maybe one was the basketball playing legend, the other was his pale, shortstop playing cousin.
How many teams that both have a former top five quarterback and have been near the top of the league when that quarterback has started would not have been as good but for their quarterback?
I submit that only the Colts would not be as good if not for Manning. That includes, off the top of my head, the Steelers and Roethlisberger, Seahawks and Hasselbeck, Falcons and Vick, Jaguars and Leftwich. We'll see about E. Manning and Phillip Rivers.
I agree with you about the other guys. Vick brings as many problems as he solves. Leftwich is limited, but so is the Jags run-heavy offense. EManning and Rivers - who knows?
Stan from Tacoma
But I would say that he is a sandwich pick between the elite, top 5 or 6, talent and the rest of the first round.
It also is one of the few books that covers the L.A. era.
Most books on Dodgers history stop in 1957.
(For the record, I used to root for Cal and still pull for them to some extent, but admittedly am now a USC guy).
I see what you're saying though, with the top-5 draft selection. QB's are usually over-valued there, and you're much better off drafting a stud RB or OL at that spot.
But a few years back, with the successes of Brady and Warner, and the QB busts of Leaf, Akili Smith, etc. it was darn close to conventional wisdom that you don't need a "1st-round quality" QB to succeed in teh NFL.
That is clearly untrue now. Only Jake Delhomme and Tom Brady qualify as draft-day sleepers who head up high-quality teams these day.
Stan from Tacoma
Stan from Tacoma
He also never dated Paris Hilton, so that alone makes him smarter!
But I regress, er, digress...
Think USC has already offered the fetus an athletic scholarship?
Also, I was traumatized last night by my wife's observation that Vin was wearing a rug. I know, I know, it seems obvious he does (doesn't he?) but I'm in deep, deep denial Vin's not going to be with us forever.
I'm ashamed to even mention it. It feels like a rule violation.
http://tinyurl.com/f7neg
Vin in 1965:
http://tinyurl.com/k3695
Vin in 1962
http://tinyurl.com/gb6y9
Vin in 1955:
http://tinyurl.com/fxdno
Vin in 1998:
http://tinyurl.com/zjgca
http://tinyurl.com/jmvw3
http://tinyurl.com/f5e72
http://tinyurl.com/kmq7x
Anyone know of a sports bar that would be nice to meet at, and safe enough for her to leave her car there?
Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks!
http://tinyurl.com/zmzuj
Yes, Al Davis among others.
1. El Compadre on Sunset - Mexican restaurant and bar, with good margaritas and sports on tv, which is right next to . . .
2. The Shortstop. Hipster former cop bar with only streep parking and no food. Pretty fun place, though, with cheap drinks.
3. The Red Lion on Glendale. Not as close to the ball park. German food and beer (plus full bar). Sports on tv both on the lower bar level and upstairs on the patio (great if the weather's nice, which of course it will be on a Sept. evening.
I suppose the California Club on North Broadway that forever has had a sign that says "Nigth Club" on it wouldn't qualify?
I also think that place falls down on his "safe enough to leave the car" criteria.
You have to use an accent when you use streep parking.
One day, when accompanied by a sufficiently armed phalanx of guards, I will venture inside that bar.
You can use my TV and I'll buy an extra 12 pack of Diet Coke! But one of you would have to clean out the cat box.
There are a lot of reasons why Leinart might be a bust. However, I've never been convinced that arm strength is a severe negative -- depending on what style of offense is being run and how intelligent the quarterback is.
"The Boston Red Sox traded pitcher David Wells to San Diego on Thursday, ESPN The Magazine's Buster Olney reported.
A source told ESPN.com's Jerry Crasnick that the Padres would get minor-league catcher George Kottaras for Wells."
Emphasis mine.
Seriously though - is Kotteras (or however it's spelled) any good? Being the #2 guy in the Padre organization isn't indicative of anything necessarily.
So, you're not going to meet at my place?
I wish you the best. From my vast experience about blind dates (all 3 of them), 1/3 lead to a second date, 1/3 lead to many more dates, and 1/3 are total and utter disasters.
Maybe I should create a chart.
My Joke!
I used this line on a peer (person of same age and general interests, not British aristocry) today, and he had no clue at all what I was talking about. Wondering now if I'm just the only one who found this memorable.
So, I say, in kind of a scratchy, but firm, voice: "I want you to play [pause] my song."
DT favorite Pedro Astacio just left with 4 runs in and 2 on in the 5th, FYI.
He's a bit thin for a catcher (6', 180 lbs), so I guess there are questions about how long he can stay behind the plate. Some Padre fans seem to think he's nothing special, but the minor league publications have given him some good marks.
Guess Hamulack will be hamu-back on Monday. And Kuo is in LA already. No word about LaRoche and others so far.
So far in this series versus the Nationals, Ryan Howard is 5 for 9, 4BB, 6 RBIs.
i'm pretty sure he'll hit 50 HR's this year.
Hey Sam, where did the Jose Vidro go?
http://www.progressiveboink.com/dugout/archive/jon64.html
Although having released Damian Jackson makes it a lot harder to field the all-second-baseman outfield that was the team's lifeblood early on.
I guess awe of Ryan Howard is my topic.
Another note, LaRoche is back in the lineup but he is still nursing the labrum.
i was hoping they bring up Mark Alexander, am i wrong for thinking he'd help out alot more than Hamulak?
bobby-coxer: Danys? Are there two of you?
BaezBelongs2Danys: no but i have the ERA of two men*
LOL that's brilliant.
i'll be there in person for that match up.
Old friend Alex Cora up to the plate, hits one fairly deep to right. Rios has an easy beat on it, it bounces off his glove, he tries to snag it with his hand, AND IT GOES OVER THE FENCE. How is that not an error?
Most managers disagree of course.
Time for the Z-man to work his walk off magic?
I know he's Swedish and all, but are all his movies subtitled? I'd like to watch all of his famed works, but I'm not a big fan of having to read while watching a movie. I'm thinking of The Seventh Seal in particular.
Nationals have two players left on their bench (not counting pitchers -- losing Livan hurts here).
Phillies have three.
You want to watch a dubbed version of a Bergman film?
Why don't you watch "Interiors", a Woody Allen movie? It's an homage to Bergman and in English.
As for Interiors, eh, I don't usually like Woody when he gets all serious, except for Match Point.
A Nats chatter just stated that HBP set the franchise single season record.
Which franchise?
Did Nunez just score a game-winning run? After a clutch intangible from Conine?
Looks like they were including Montreal.
That was HBP 79 by the Nats. The Expos plunked 79 batters in their last year in Canada.
In 1939, the Phillies were hit by pitches just 9 times.
The Sporting News record book seems suspect in this category.
Mr. Brock, if the Romans lived in 400 B.C., how did they know it was 400 years before Jesus was going to be born? Did God tell them?
I count 79 HBPs for Nats pitchers tying the Montreal high.
I don't trust the Phillies record I have for incurring HBPs. 58 seems awfully low for a team that's been around as long as the Phillies.
Can you please make 275 a running feature?
he does that all the time i remember a game i attended about 1 1/2 month ago (Lowe starting pitcher) annoyed the heck out of everybody in the stadium.
Can I call you at the reference desk (from your apartment, of course) for traffic reports and restaurant recommendations?
And I gather from 286 that good news for the Nats will show up soon.
But wait until tomorrow!
It's tough enough working with freshman. Special ed freshman are, well, even more special.
It makes me wonder. Yeah, and it makes me wonder.
By the way, I hear a lot about how the Diamondbacks will be a real challenge in the future with all their youngsters. But, look out for the Rockies, too.
A long time ago, I subbed for special ed kids. My experience was that they were exceptionally nice, but it certainly must be a challenge every day.
Has anyone ever walked into that bar to tell them that their sign is misspelled?
And lived?
am i less of a man now? i mean those girls are on the UofA womens basketball team, but still...they are girls.
If anyone has tried this before, you would know that cats don't particularly enjoy this task.
Some days are great and some days you want to pull your hair out. My girlfriend reports that it is the same in regular ed classes as well.
I wonder what his first name is?
I wish I could have seen Buffalo's 9-3 win over Temple in overtime.
http://www.draysbay.com/story/2006/8/30/172410/702
315 - Are we trying to break all of Jon's rules again tonight? ;)
In July .215/.319/.354
In August .261/.329/.362
Oh no, we just got Marlon Anderson! Goodbye Dewitt (I'm joking about the last part). Ned loves to make moves just for the sake of making moves.
This year (overall) .267/.325/.419
As a PH .240/.350/.300 (50 AB)
As a 2B .283/.336/.505 (99 AB)
Quick story. I met Marlon Anderson when he played for the Phillies. I talked to him for 5-10 during batting practice. He's a nice guy and a decent bench player. Unfortunately, Ned probably gave up a B prospect for him. He's also not a power hitter.
That other guy just cussed and they didn't bleep it out. Pretty exciting.
Marlon Anderson? Why? Really, what slot is he gonna fill? I'd rather have David Wells. Then again, I wouldn't give up the equivalent of Kottaras for him.
The roster count holds at 5.
I don't like Andre Agassi for the same reason I don't like Derek Jeter. The preening, the affectation, the carefully choreographed "emotional" stuff. I didn't like that he thought he was important enough to challenge the etiquette of the greatest tennis tournament in the world. I hated his "Image is everything" persona early in his career. Crying after every Grand Slam win. I didn't buy into his "Now I'm a mature statesman" transformation. I didn't like being told that I'm supposed to like him because he's all grown up now.
I was always a Sampras guy. Never complain, never make excuses, just be a great player. It's the same reason I count Rod Laver as my favorite tennis player ever, even though I never saw him play a match.
And, as I write this, Agassi says "This crowd renewed my joy in the human spirit." Puh-lease.
I can accept that. I didn't like Agassi at all during his early days, and rooted for Pete in their rivalry. But I'm more positively disposed toward him now.
My all-time fave is Stefan Edberg.
the Dodgers are also taking him on for 2007, when he'll make another $925,000.
Then again, with rosters expanding, we'd have had Loney on the pine by tomorrow anyway.
I'm impressed with how Steffi has aged. I think she's much more attractive now than back when she played.
358
I loved the Edberg-Becker rivalry, though Boris came out on top more than I would have liked. And I'll never forget the Wimbledon Stefan lost to Stich in 3 straight tie-breakers, without a single break of serve in the entire match.
The only downside was losing Arthur Ashe, a man I put in the very, very small category of athletes who meant a tremendous amount to me off the field of play.
If Marlon means we lose Megrew or a similar player in the Rule 5 draft, then this is a horrible deal. Otherwise, it's just Ned making a move because he thinks he needs to.
why are you so angry?
I don't even watch the French Open. It's like watching the 100 meter dash being run on the beach. Baseline tennis is beyond boring. Another reason I didn't like Agassi.
Anderson- 146 ABs, .282/.350/.454
Saenz- 117 ABs, .248/.305/.487
Repko- 74 ABs, .270/.325/.324
Martinez- 130 ABs, .285/.340/.377
Hall- 194 ABs, .237/.260/.366
Loney- 62 ABs, .274/.357/.484
Ledee- 63 ABs, .206/.242/.333
Cruz- 156 ABs, .199/.324/.321
Loney could probably do exactly what Anderson would do, but he's pretty clearly an upgrade to our bench otherwise.
I generally don't watch the French anymore either. It might be interesting if someone other than a "clay court specialist" won for a change, but it rarely happens.
The serve and volley seems to be dying a slow death, with the new racket technology and all. It's too bad. The game used to be more interesting in the pre 120+ MPH serve era.
Oh great...
Sir, at the risk of talking politics, I would like to hand you a pamphlet about the best political party in the world, the Whigs.
We Whigs believe in banning the alternate uniform, eliminating the aluminum bat industry, limiting technological advances in golf and tennis, and mandating all weekend baseball be played during the day. We're also anti-DH.
Yes, we're a small party, and sure, we've been out of the loop for a while, but with your support and "contributions," I believe we can make positive change in America.
D4P, the Whig party can use a man like you. Would that be something you might be interested in?
I understand your rules, Jon, but is there a time when sarcasm is not misinterpreted negatively?
Can I still be a fascist...?
Let me talk to my people. I'll see what I can do.
If it doesn't work out, I also have a doomsday cult you may be interested in.
The Nats are paying $400,000 of next year's salary.
Be warned. It looks interesting, but very, very sad. It's about the Golden Gate Bridge.
http://tinyurl.com/j2blm
While its not unusual to have a few rookies play key roles in playoff contention teams, a lot of times, the guys who win those games are the journeymen infielder, the back up catcher, the 4th outfielder, why is that, those guys have made a career of focusing on that one at bat, those few innings in the field.
Sure, your everyday lineup and regular pitchers are what takes to the playoffs, but it is those guys whose names are not on that lineup card that gets handed to umpire prior to the first pitch who often win a game or two.
I think I have a new friend at Dodger Thoughts.
This weekend, Lowe, Penny and Bills
Milwaukee, Maddux, 5th, and Lowe
New York, Penny, Bills, Maddux, 5th guy
Chicago, Lowe, Penny, and Bills
San Diego, Maddux, 5th guy, Lowe, and Penny
Pittsburgh, Bills, Maddux, 5th guy
Arizona, Lowe, Penny, and Bills
Colorado Maddux, Lowe(skip 5th), Penny
San Francisco, Billingsley, Open, Maddux
I can see them starting Sele against Milwaukee, he had success with them in his first start, even though it could be very intimidating, having Kuo against the Mets could work out, back at home, Sele or Kuo against the Pads and then Sele could probably deal with the Pirates.
The last week hopefully won't be nervous time but really with the off day before that trip, the only game where you may have to scramble is the second to last day, and actually Maddux maybe could go the day before and Lowe could go on shorts day rest on the last game.
Since nobody under the age of 120 knows what a Spy print is, it's pretty irrelevant. But Mill is my guy.
finally did. apparently there is a whole internet forum decidated to trying to fix the "blue screen" problem.
Sorry, D4P.
Matt Kemp and James Loney will change into familiar uniforms today and Ned Colletti can extract his heels from the place he dug in and refused to budge.
Thanks to Colletti's resolve, the coveted prospects will travel from triple-A Las Vegas and join the Dodgers when rosters expand instead of joining the Boston Red Sox in exchange for pitcher David Wells.
Honestly, its not that hard to say no. Its like Henson is trying to give Colletti the purple heart or something.
thats about kershaw.
I cant wait for him. Dear Baseball Gods, please look after his health.
Stan from Tacoma
Five months into his first season here, Grady Little has no clue how to act like a first-place Dodgers manager.
Which is one of the biggest reasons they are in first place
It is this quiet acceptance that shines through his dad-gums and his drawl. He never embarrasses his players. He is rarely impatient with the media.
The anti-Jimbo.
Grits is a good manager because he gives players a chance to play. Sometimes, he will screw up and play mediocre veterans for too long, but eventually he realizes his mistake and isn't afraid to make a change. Grits does not play favorites. Grits is a manager I can root for because he doesn't have a gigantic ego. He gives the players credit for winning.
Anderson has been OK this year (OK in a "good enough to play for the Nationals" sense) but why in Choi's name do the Dodgers need another such player?
Now I have to run around and will read the above comments later.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.