Baseball Toaster was unplugged on February 4, 2009.
Jon's other site:
Screen Jam
TV and more ...
1) using profanity or any euphemisms for profanity
2) personally attacking other commenters
3) baiting other commenters
4) arguing for the sake of arguing
5) discussing politics
6) using hyperbole when something less will suffice
7) using sarcasm in a way that can be misinterpreted negatively
8) making the same point over and over again
9) typing "no-hitter" or "perfect game" to describe either in progress
10) being annoyed by the existence of this list
11) commenting under the obvious influence
12) claiming your opinion isn't allowed when it's just being disagreed with
I really don't like making predictions about who will play in October. I think they're pretty useless the moment they're published, and their sole value seems to be to allow readers to point out how wrong you were. Which I usually am.
So I was glad that when Baseball Analysts invited me to chit-chat about the National League West, I was mostly allowed to just think out loud in a way that doesn't force me to, you know, be right.
Even at the end, when asked to predict the final NL West standings, I had free reign to undermine my own picks. Anyway, hope you enjoy the chat, which can be found here - Rich Lederer, Patrick Sullivan and Geoff Young have a whole lot of insights to share.
The format where you just have to name the teams you picked, without being to explain your reservations about your pick, just doesn't work for me.
3 - Actually, you're the first!
I hate to be a party-pooper, so when people ask me to make predictions, I usually get on board. But I really like to be able to convey my intense sense of doubt.
http://tinyurl.com/2oxk33
Four letter words are strong enough so you are OK there. Predicting without hedge comments would seem like what a witness has to endure when an attorney shuts them up by saying yes or no, or a weatherman saying it is not going to rain, unless it does.
No.
"has anybody really ever seriously taken you to task for a prediction that you've gotten wrong?"
Yes.
I really don't like the Padres.
Anytime I think I know anything before the start of the year, I think back to 2004. Pre-season the Cubs were picked to run away with their division on the strenght of their amazing pitching, but instead the Cards won by 13 games, and the Cubbies were in third, a distant 16 games back. I had to eat a lot of crow from my STL friends and I vowed never to make predictions again. Of course I bragged to the same people again before the playoffs last year and we all know how that turned out.
I really don't mean to single you out Eric. It's just that I stopped visiting BTF for a while because every thread had that guy posting that comment in it.
Even if it had nothing to do with the Dodgers or DBacks.
Yeah, me too -- him and others like him are why I don't go there anymore. The wolves have long since taken over that place anyway.
You could compare dozens of players if that was the only criteria.
I don't even read a large segment of the Dodger blogs online because there is just too much content. I wonder about other people's daily blog reading, because mine is reaching the point of interfering with my normal lifestyle. There is just so many good things out there.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=pearlman/070406&sportCat=mlb
And Jon, what did you think of the Andre Either-as-Garret Anderson comparison from this chat?
"Hey Hendrickson, slump down! You're blockin' my view of Will Ferrell's double axle!"
And here I was waiting to see that one on DVD, silly me.
Do people really do this? I wouldn't think they'd care enough to remember. You shouldn't care either. The self isn't important. Go on and make predictions. They're fun. Nothing more.
How do you keep bumping into Dodgers?
Last April, I got called all sorts of names on all sorts of web sites for having the audacity to pick the Tigers to win the AL Central. They didn't win it, but I wasn't quite so stupid as people said I was. The year before, I said the Mariners would have a lousy OBP and finish last, and I got called an idiot on some Mariners web sites, and then the Mariners went on to have a lousy OBP and finished last.
So if you're an idiot when you're right, imagine what people think of you when you're wrong.
Why is Brady Clark on the roster? Why trade for this guy if you are going to keep Kemp on the roster?
If James Loney never had a chance to make the team, then why set him up for failure and heartbreak?
Was the Nomar signing a result of Colletti's lack of anger management after the Drew departure? Did he simply have a panic attack before thinking his decisions through?
Why is Marlon Anderson on this team anyway? What value does a backup lefthanded outfielder on a team that starts three lefthanders?
Can the Dodger outfield defense really be as bad as I have been reading about?
Just some thoughts and questions.
I saw Dan Haren near Westfield Mall. That is about it for my athlete interaction.
Huh? What happened? Just a general statement or did he feed you cat bad catfood?
-Clark was acquired because he can play good defense at all three outfield positions, take a walk, and can be stashed on the bench. Hopefully the Dodgers plan isn't to have Kemp on the bench all season. Even if it was thoughtless, we didn't lose anything worthwhile to begin with.
-No clue.
-You'd have to ask Colletti. At the very least it was a good P.R. move since Nomar is beloved down here.
-Anderson added a left handed bat off the bench when the Dodgers needed one last season, and he was under contract for this season. The .800 slug he had for the Dodgers means you can't just cut him.
-In terms of catching the ball, they're probably below average, but it is very terrible collection of arms they have out there.
Most of my knowledge of Tommy's influence on the moves that were made at the end of 2005 is based on just intuition since DePodesta was not a favorite of Tommy but I do think that the hiring of Ned was based more on Ned's interaction with Frank than any influence by Tommy.
I think you have to have written about sports professionally, or at least publicly, to know how this can be.
Some people think that if you write sports and make predictions and those predictions turn out wrong, then you don't know what you're doing. "He--, I could do as well as he does. He doesn't know any more about this than I do, maybe less. Why did they hire him? How does he keep his job?"
Knowledge of sports and a job writing about them don't mean your predictions will be dead on. Too many variables. You may know more than most people, but your predictions won't be infallible. But too many people will expect them to be and won't be exactly forgiving when they're not. Some will seek you out and try to give you grief about it.
Not enough people read predictions for fun, muse over whether they agree and why, then move on, probably not even remember what was predicted after a few days. Or, if they do remember, realize that this isn't exactly life or death, and that predicting sports is just going to be inexact. That's probably about the process most DT readers would follow.
But not enough folks are like DT readers/commenters, most of whom are several cuts above the average sports fan.
{hops off soapbox, takes chill pill}
Station On Dial City
KFWB 980 Los Angeles
KNZR 1560 Bakersfield
KMET 1490 Banning
KBOV 1230 Bishop
KROP 1300 Brawley/El Centro
KCBL 1340 Fresno
KAVL 610 Lancaster/Palmdale
KSFN 1140 Las Vegas
KPSI 920 Palm Springs
KXTY 99.7 San Luis Obispo
KHTS 1230 Santa Clarita
KVEN 1450 Ventura/Oxnard
KEZL 1400 Visalia
A good friend went to Dodger Fantasy Camp regularly in the early '90s. He reported that the campers tolerated Lasorda, but loved Perranoski.
Same here. That's why I said that Tracy's firing was the peak of hope. I was very disappointed when DePodesta was fired (well, furious at the time, disappointed in retrospect), but hope didn't die immediately. It remained to be seen who his successor would be, and what he would do. That was even in enough doubt after a few months (several months?) that Jon could write that piece arguing (quite reasonably) that, to that point, the differences between DePodesta and Colletti had been overblown.
But the more we learn, the less I like, and the less hope I retain.
Wow! talk about your thorough answers. Very nice.
Lasorda, to say the least, is a complicated guy. He is responsible for a great many good things, but to say his public side isn't a full capture of the man is an understatement. I find it quite easy to be a Dodger fan and at best ambivalent about him.
http://dodgers.scout.com/2/633351.html
http://tinyurl.com/238ddd
61 - I took almost all my cues on Lasorda-McCourt from the anti-Depo media.
I definitely have my blind-spots when it comes to Depodesta, because I have quaffed long and hard from the stathead Koolaid, but in truth he obviously wasn't perfect. He made some mistakes and obviously wasn't great at selling his vision. However, he got fired before we had a chance to even figure out his plan. What's the sense of changing horses in midstream? Then I guess I wouldn't be terribly upset if Ned got fired this winter, so I guess I am a hypocrite on top of everything else.
He's a teammate of my future brother-in-law.
That Nebraska game incident that they mention in the article was quite the circus.
---
Sigh, speaking of which, I wish we had Nick Markakis. Give us one Markakis and we win a pennant. Imagine an OF of Markakis, Kemp and Ethier? Sigh.
---
Oh man, is anyone watching the game in Cleveland? It's snowing like mad, they've had several delays and are just trying to make it an official game. You can barely see anything right now so they're delaying it again. Indians are up on the Mariners, in fact they have a (very empty) no hitter going. Mariners have 3 errors. Crazy.
"Hate" is a strong word (the title of this post not withstanding), but I bleed Dodger blue as much as Lasorda does and still have a rather strong dislike for the man. It has not always been this way, but the more I've found out about him over the years, the less easy he is to like. Interacting with him personally has not changed my negative opinion.
He's really a snake -- more than any other person I know of, he acts one way when there's a camera on him and diametrically opposite when there isn't one. He can be a condescending, two-faced, out of touch, backstabbing, arrogant jerk when not in the public eye. The way he treated his son is shameful, unforgivable even. All the rah-rah stuff becomes a joke after a while. And it didn't help that he was a master of running talented young pitchers into the ground, slogging Fernando and Orel and Ramon until their arms fell off -- not to mention running Pedro Martinez out of town. The hooker thing didn't change my opinion of him at all; I'd written him off long before that.
Hey, I don't agree with it either, but a rule's a rule.
Apparently Oguchi is going to transfer.
I would have missed the violation in 70 if Eric hadn't pointed it out.
Basically, we get Legion if AA leaves. So either way, we win.
That is if the Dodgers game doesn't get too much in the way tonight.
Interesting. Willing to divulge any information about it?
Maybe I'll edit with the sound down on the game, so I can a) concentrate better and b) not have to listen to the Giants announcers for too long.
Alligators and war...
You have my attention.
--
In minor league news, Philip Hughes first game was snowed out, and whoever's pitching for Durham today is struggling. Oh, I see that Peguero's line score is
0.2 6 8 8 2 0 1 108.00
in that one.
Comment status: comments have been closed. Baseball Toaster is now out of business.